[CTRL] The truth about dimples, finally!

2001-02-06 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

{{I always wondered how a sharp stylus could only make a
round dimple.  The paper was not too thick, so how did this
happen?  Below makes perfect sense to me. AKE}}

 1.  Dimples.  Walter Williams filled in for Limbaugh last
Thursday.  He related a story from a friend of his from
Florida about dimpled ballots.  It seems that the dimpled
ballots were a product of another democrat voter fraud
effort.  Voters were given several ballots at once.  They
inserted them into the machines and tried - unsuccessfully -
to punch them simultaneously.  This sort of explains why
democrat recount experts were so intent on counting dimpled
ballots.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Utilities fought attempts to boost power supply, monitoring in '90s

2001-02-06 Thread Steve Wingate

-Caveat Lector-

Utilities fought attempts to boost power supply, monitoring in '90s

BY CHRIS O'BRIEN Mercury News

The state's three largest utilities blocked attempts to build more power
plants six years ago despite a key state commission's prediction that they
were needed because California's demand for electricity would begin to
soar.

At the time, the utilities called those forecasts of increased demand -- since
proven frighteningly accurate -- outrageous. They appealed to the federal
government, which overruled the state's efforts to increase the supply of
electricity. To settle their dispute with the state, the utilities then chose to
pay energy companies more than $100 million not to build new plants.

That battle was fought primarily by Southern California Edison and San
Diego Gas  Electric Co., which insist those plants would make little
difference in the present energy crisis. But critics -- and even one PGE
Corp. executive -- say that, if those 1,400 megawatts had come online in
1998 as planned, they would have eased the current energy crunch.

But the impact of the utilities' actions also goes well beyond the loss of that
electricity. The battle over those plants derailed the state's process for
monitoring energy needs and for ensuring that enough power plants are
built. When demand did surge, it was no one's job to pay attention. And by
the time the state's process for approving new power plants got back on
track after deregulation in 1996, the state had already fallen too far behind
when shortages began forcing rolling blackouts last month.

``San Diego Gas and Electric and Edison went out of their way to make
sure these plants didn't get built,'' said Jan Smutny-Jones, executive
director of the Independent Energy Producers. ``If those plants had gotten
built, they would be making a significant contribution to keeping the lights
on in California.''

President Bush and energy companies are fond of saying that California
failed to build any power plants for more than a decade because of red
tape and out-of-control environmentalists.

Closer to home, the three big utilities try to deflect blame by claiming there
was a surge in demand for electricity that nobody could have predicted.

Neither claim is true.

California stopped approving major power plants projects in 1986 after a
flood of them were built in the early 1980s. In addition, during peak
demand, the state could buy as much as one-third of the power it needed
from its more sparsely populated neighbors such as Arizona.

But by 1992, the California Energy Commission, the agency that licenses
and approves new power plants, saw those conditions changing.
Population in neighboring states was rising fast, leaving less electricity to
sell to California. And, with projections that the state's recession would end
in the mid-1990s, California's population and economy were expected to
boom in the latter half of the decade.

Energy forecast

The agency's 1992 biennial forecast of the state's energy needs projected
that peak demand for electricity would grow from 47,813 megawatts in
1995 to 58,864 megawatts in 2000. Two years later, the commission
revised its 2000 forecast downward to 55,819 megawatts.

The state's actual peak demand for 2000 turned out to be 54,110
megawatts.

``We felt those were conservative estimates at the time,'' said Claudia
Chandler, an assistant executive director at the energy commission. ``In the
five-year time period, we expected to see an average growth of 2 percent
each year. That was taking into account energy efficiency and population
growth.''

The commission passed its forecast to the California Public Utilities
Commission, which regulates the state's utilities. The PUC's analysts
crunched some numbers and determined that the three utilities would need
an additional 1,400 megawatts by 1998.

Law aimed for competition

Under a 1978 federal law intended to spark competition, the PUC decided
to require the utilities to contract with independent companies to generate
the power. Those companies then would build enough plants throughout the
state to supply the projected shortfall.

The utilities vigorously objected.

``Edison does not need any additional power until at least 2005,'' John
Bryson, chairman and CEO of Southern California Edison Co., wrote in a
1994 letter.

Besides believing extra power wasn't needed, the utilities didn't want to
sign long-term contracts because deregulation was around the corner. And
they opposed the auctions the PUC set up to award contracts. Under the
rules, some of the contracts would be awarded to generators who would
sell environmentally friendly power, which would cost the utilities much
more.

In 1995, San Diego and Edison appealed the PUC's auctions to the
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission. Pacific Gas  Electric Co. did
not join in because it was in an awkward position. A PGE joint venture
had won several contracts to build power plants in San Diego and Edison
territory.

A 

Re: [CTRL] The truth about dimples, finally!

2001-02-06 Thread Steve Wingate

-Caveat Lector-

And if you believe that, I have some 'lakeside property' in West Texas I'd
like to sell you. Construction on the dam is said to begin soon...

Steve

On 6 Feb 01, at 2:26, Amelia wrote:


 {{I always wondered how a sharp stylus could only make a
 round dimple.  The paper was not too thick, so how did this
 happen?  Below makes perfect sense to me. AKE}}

  1.  Dimples.  Walter Williams filled in for Limbaugh last
 Thursday.  He related a story from a friend of his from
 Florida about dimpled ballots.  It seems that the dimpled
 ballots were a product of another democrat voter fraud
 effort.  Voters were given several ballots at once.  They
 inserted them into the machines and tried - unsuccessfully -
 to punch them simultaneously.  This sort of explains why
 democrat recount experts were so intent on counting dimpled
 ballots.



ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Patriarchy and the Drug War

2001-02-06 Thread pmeares

-Caveat Lector-

--
excerpt from:
http://egodeath.com/new.htm
--

The WOD is not "like" the old Inquisition, it *is* the old
Inquisition.  The best book explaining this is Shamanism and
the Drug Propaganda: Patriarchy and the Drug War. Dan
Russell. 11/98.

The Catholic Church formula was to take all the money and
possessions of anyone who used plants to have independent
religious experiencing.  The authorities forcefully insisted
that life must be lived within the total framework they
provided, mentally, experientially, and economically.  To
live outside that framework and to have religious or
philosophical experiencing outside that framework was to
break the law, which the church liked because then they
could gain all your possessions and money.  Science,
democracy, and the renaissance were largely rejections of
that sort of authoritarianism and forced hierarchical
government which could treat people as having no rights and
no property rights.  America was founded on the principle of
no martyrs, no victims of government campaigns, of inverting
the power relation and rights-relations of citizen and
government.  The government exists to serve the people; the
people do not exist to sustain the government.  Property
belongs to citizens, not to the king, pope, or governmental
hierarchy, nor to the police/guard/soldiers.

We need a better understanding of persecution by the
church.  People think it is about belief and doctrines at
bottom, but as far as the power brokers in the top of the
Church hierarchy is concerned, it is purely about worldly
money and the power of money and the power to accumulate
more money.  Ultimately, the Church didn't directly care
what people *believed*, but rather, what happened to the
people's *money*, which was directly affected by people's
beliefs.

The police love druggies and hope for lots of them, because
every identified or accused druggie means another property
and batch of money to seize.  The police-authoritarians love
accused druggies for the same reason the
Church-authoritarians loved accused witches -- these
demarcated "devils" or boogiemen give the authoritarians the
green light to take all the wealth which the person has
accumulated, without the person having any recourse.  The
person is sent to hell either way, or some other realm, from
which the person has no power to stop the authorities.
Whether the person marked as a damned one is sent to jail
for a long, long time, or killed and sent to hell or heaven
or purgatory, it's all the same to the authorities' bank
account: the person is removed, and their wealth is freed up
to be confiscated by the authorities.

It is crucial that we study the similarities between
confiscation of the property of plant-using people (branded
as "witches"), the Boston Tea Party, and forfeiture in the
War On Drugs.  These are all about the exact same thing at
the core.  I want to emphasize this above all: it is not an
accident that the WOD is covered by the Boston Tea Party; or
that drug use is covered by religious freedom.  America was
not started to prevent things *like* the war on drugs, it
was started and the constitution and bill of rights were
created to prevent specifically the war on drugs, not to
stop things *like* the war on drugs.  The Bill of Rights was
not created to prevent this *sort* of thing; it was simply
and frankly designed to stop this *very* thing.  The WOD is
not accidently covered by the Bill of Rights; the Bill of
Rights was meant to stop the WOD and also other things like
it.   The Bill of Rights was crafted and designed expressly
to block exactly what is really going on at the heart of the
WOD, this dynamic of people being victims of arbitrary
searches and seizures of contraband, money, property,
wealth.

Problem: authorities wield power to pillage and confiscate
anything they feel like; all possessions potentially are the
property of the State, on excuses so flimsy and accusations
so vague, in the final analysis, no excuse or accusation is
needed at all.  Authorities see something they want, and
they take it; this is complete and blatant government
anarchy.

Solution: restraints on government.  The foundation of
America is the idea of restraint on government to prevent
arbitrary persecution, persecution which is most perfectly
represented by the war on drugs, the war on contrabands, the
war on alternatives to the governmentally enforced lifestyle
and worldview.  Such governments only permit one worldview,
the one which causes all wealth to flow their way.  If you
adopt a worldview which doesn't willingly send your flow of
wealth in the direction of the authorities, then they take
your wealth against your will, by force and by fiat.

Part of the strategy the authorties must use is propaganda
designed to coerce the will of the citizens, the will of
"the governed".  So we see manipulation of beliefs and
encouraging a sense of respect: respect for the King, for
the Pope, for the police, for the media.  Sure, many

Re: [CTRL] UPI: Gephardt asks Bush to re-nominate White

2001-02-06 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/04/2001 9:15:15 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  WASHINGTON, Feb. 2 (UPI) -- A top Democrat asked President
 George W. Bush Friday to re-nominate Judge Ronnie White to the
 federal bench following questions about his 1999 Senate
 rejection, raised during recent confirmation hearings for
 Attorney General John Ashcroft.

  Missouri Rep. Richard Gephardt, the ranking Democrat in the
 House, sent a letter to Bush that said the re-nomination of White
 would "heal the wounds" opened during Ashcroft's bruising
 confirmation battle. 

And this has about as much as of a chance of happening as that proverbial
snowball in hell.  Gephardt is a real commedian, but I'm afraid Dubya is not
really into all that reaching out he talked about before he was selected.
Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Clintons To Pay for Gifts Received

2001-02-06 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/04/2001 11:24:24 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 These Klinton defendersare they part of some secret cult??? 

It's not that we're so secretive.  It's that we're mature enough to remember
past administrations.   I've wondered myself about those of you who are
constantly in a flutter about Clinton actions.  I never thought of you as
part of a secret cult; I considered that you were probably on the
Conservative payroll.  Those guys who hate the thought of paying taxes are
extremely generous with their money when it comes to supporting Conservative
causes.  Jumping the Clinton's has been an excellent career move for many
people, especially those in the media, and I guess these little e-mails could
be considered a minor form of media.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida

2001-02-06 Thread Steve Wingate

-Caveat Lector-

--- Forwarded message follows ---
Date sent:  Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:27:35 -0800
From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:SNET: Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida vote
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Copies to:  Cosmic Comentary [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org
WSWS : News  Analysis : North America : US Politics

Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida vote

By Patrick Martin
5 February 2001

Two newly published studies of the ballots cast in the US presidential
election confirm that Democrat Al Gore was the choice of more Florida
voters than Republican George W. Bush, who was installed as president
after an unprecedented and anti-democratic intervention by the US
Supreme Court.

One study was conducted by the Washington Post, the other by Tribune
Co., which owns the Chicago Tribune, the Orlando Sentinel, and the Fort
Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel. The Post endorsed Gore editorially in the
November election, while the Tribune endorsed Bush.

The Post reviewed computerized records of 2.7 million votes in eight of
Florida's largest counties to examine the pattern of the so-called overvotes,
those ballots on which computer scanners or other vote-counting machines
detected votes for more than one presidential candidate and discarded the
ballots as invalid. The newspaper did not recount individual ballots, but
relied on reports from county officials based on machine tabulation of the
invalid ballots.

The analysis found that of the more than 60,000 ballots in the eight counties
showing overvotes—the bulk of the statewide total—Gore's name was
marked on 46,000, while Bush was marked on only 17,000. This includes
several thousand ballots in which both Gore and Bush were marked.

The 3-1 Democratic to Republican ratio among the overvotes was
confirmed in the analysis of other votes cast by those voters further down
the ballot. Three quarters of those who improperly cast a presidential
overvote marked their ballots correctly for US senator. Of these, 70 percent
voted for Democrat Bill Nelson, only 24 percent for Republican Bill
McCollum, while 6 percent voted for third-party candidates.

The nearly 30,000-vote margin for Gore among the overvotes dwarfs the
537 votes which was Bush's official margin of victory in Florida. On the
basis of that minuscule and highly dubious number, the Republican-
controlled state government, headed by his brother, Governor Jeb Bush,
awarded him the state's 25 electoral votes and a four-vote margin in the
Electoral College nationally.

The eight counties examined by the Post included Miami-Dade, Palm
Beach, Broward (Fort Lauderdale), Pinellas (St. Petersburg), Hillsborough
(Tampa), Marion (Ocala), Highlands and Pasco. Four of these counties
went for Gore and four for Bush. The pattern of more overvotes for Gore
prevailed in all the counties, however, regardless of who won the county
overall.

The notorious “butterfly ballot” in Palm Beach County accounted for 8,000
of the Gore overvotes, most of them double votes for Gore and far-right
Reform Party candidate Patrick Buchanan, who was listed across from
Gore on the ballot, with his punch-hole close to the names of Gore and
Lieberman. Gore-Buchanan voters in Palm Beach County voted 10-1
Democratic in the US Senate race.

In the other seven counties, the largest group of overvotes were for Gore
and the candidate who followed immediately after him on the ballot,
Libertarian Harry Browne. Such a combination is incomprehensible as a
protest vote, especially one supposedly chosen by 6,800 voters. It more
likely reflects confusion among voters who thought they had to cast votes
for president and vice-president.

Confirming the notion that the overvotes were largely intended for Gore is
the fact that most of the third-party candidates on the ballot for president
received more votes paired with Gore as overvotes than they did in their
own right. In the eight counties, Socialist Workers Party candidate James
Harris received a total of 300 votes, but his name was punched 12,600
times on ballots with Gore, Bush or another presidential candidate—42
inadvertent votes for each intentional vote.

The Republican head of the Florida Division of Elections, Clay Roberts,
dismissed the Post analysis with an argument of stupefying cynicism,
claiming that overvotes were intentional political choices. “People who are
engaged in politics can't understand why people would overvote,” he said.
“But there are valid reasons for undervotes and overvotes. For some
voters, that undervote or overvote is their decision.”

The Post also found more than 15,000 voters in the eight counties who cast
no recorded votes for any office or referendum. This suggests widespread
difficulty with voting equipment, or major errors in the computerized count,
or both, since it is impossible to 

Re: [CTRL] NM: Clinton Wanted to Pardon FBI Killer Peltier, says Governor

2001-02-06 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/04/2001 12:09:30 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:


 Ex-President Clinton wanted to pardon convicted double murderer
 Leonard Peltier, says South Dakota Gov. Bill Janklow, who
 traveled to the White House in December to argue against the
 move.

  "I'm probably the one responsible for Leonard Peltier not
 getting out," the Republican governor told local reporters Friday
 morning, adding that Clinton probably would have turned the
 killer loose without his intervention.

  A spokesman with Janklow's office confirmed his remarks to
 NewsMax.com on Saturday. 

Yeah, the one guy he should have pardoned.  Janklow had better hope he was
right.  Maybe there is no such thing as karma, but then maybe there is.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Gifts Were Not Meant for Clintons

2001-02-06 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/05/2001 10:05:17 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   one for which the Clintons should be faulted.

   This is an important point.  So far, the Clinton's have been responsive to
 recent criticism:  they are going to pay half for the gifts taken, and half
 for the rent of Bill's office.  If they took gifts intended for the WH but
 which were wrongly added to the White House gifts office list, then they will
 likely correct the error once it is sorted out.  But the damage has already
 been done - they are made to appear as greedy grasping trailer trash.  I am
 almost forced to like and admire them in spite of the faults of the
 administration simply because they are so relentlessly harangued.

 Samantha 

Let's face it, endless haranging is the Clinton's lot.  It keeps people from
watching what the Republicans are getting away with.  Now we come to a new
idea.  Can anyone give anything they want to give to the White House?  If you
designate that gift as to the White House, are they forced to keep it in
there forever?  I have a couple of items I'd like to donate.  What happens if
the new first lady can't stand an item?  Does she have to use it anyway?
This could be wonderful.  Does anyone out there know the answers or the
how-to of White House gift giving?  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Gifts Were Not Meant for Clintons

2001-02-06 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/05/2001 10:48:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 I think it's considered an honor to have an item accepted to be part of
the White House collection...it's
 considered a gift to the country as a whole, not to any one person who
happens to be president at the time.. 

That's really interesting.  Who decides if the item is acceptable?  Wouldn't
it be fun to have an item permanently in the White House?  I hope they have a
better system of getting rid of items than they have for old aircraft parts.
I know that Jackie got new china.  What happened to the old china?  I think
Nancy replaced Jackie's.  What happened to that?  I don't believe the dresses
were the things that Nancy took with her.  The scandal about the designer
dresses happened fairly early in Reagan's first term.  They would have been
fairly old hat by the time the Reagans left to go to the ranch (presented to
them by an admirer).  Thank God no one gave Clinton a ranch.  It would be the
sole subject of the news for the next ten years.  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] As the president eats, so eats Washington

2001-02-06 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/06/2001 2:11:13 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 "Republicans tend to eat more beef, and Democrats tend to eat more
free-range chicken," says Sally Quinn, doyenne of the Washington party scene.
Now that the GOP controls all three branches of government, the implications
for all those cattle are, well, you know.  

Sounds good to me.  What's the latest scoop on the mad cow threat?  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] White House laments DNC chief's remarks

2001-02-06 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 02/06/2001 12:33:23 AM Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

 WASHINGTON (AP) _ A White House spokesman fired back at the new
 head of the Democratic Party for questioning the legitimacy of
 President Bush's election, saying such remarks hurt efforts to build
 unity in Washington 

What is he saying?  We have unity in Washington.  We have a Republican in the
White House (by hook or by crook as they say), Republicans controlling both
the House and the Senate (Mr. Cheney is the tie breaker), and the Republican
controlled Supreme Court is in Bush's pocket.  How much unity can this
country stand?  Prudy

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] NYTimes.com Article: Beatings and Other Abuses Cited at Samoan Apparel Plant That Supplied U.S. Retailers

2001-02-06 Thread Prudence L. Kuhn

-Caveat Lector-

This article from NYTimes.com
has been sent to you by [EMAIL PROTECTED]

I can't believe this kind of thing is being allowed to happen.  Don't American buyers 
ever inspect the plants they buy from?  Prudy

/ advertisement ---\


Nortel Networks building the new, high-performance Internet

Nortel Networks is building the new, high-performance
Wireless Internet. It combines the speed, capacity and
reliability of their Optical Internet solutions, with
the anytime, anywhere mobility of wireless.
Read more about this new technology.

http://www.nytimes.com/ads/email/nortel/index1.html


\--/

Beatings and Other Abuses Cited at Samoan Apparel Plant That Supplied U.S. Retailers

February 6, 2001

By STEVEN GREENHOUSE

Workers at a Korean-owned factory in American Samoa that made
apparel for the J. C. Penney Company and other retailers were often
beaten and were provided food so inadequate that some were
quot;walking skeletons,quot;  a Labor Department investigation
found.

http://www.nytimes.com/2001/02/06/national/06SAMO.html?pagewanted=2?ex=982457072ei=1en=a25682c9d94d7f08

/-\


Visit NYTimes.com for complete access to the
most authoritative news coverage on the Web,
updated throughout the day.

Become a member today! It's free!

http://www.nytimes.com?eta


\-/

HOW TO ADVERTISE
-
For information on advertising in e-mail newsletters
or other creative advertising opportunities with The
New York Times on the Web, please contact Alyson
Racer at [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit our online media
kit at http://www.nytimes.com/adinfo

For general information about NYTimes.com, write to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Copyright 2001 The New York Times Company

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] NYP: RICH WAS SPY FOR ISRAEL

2001-02-06 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/23124.htm

RICH WAS SPY FOR ISRAEL

Monday,February 5,2001
By NILES LATHEM


Billionaire Marc Rich lived a double life during his 20 years as
a fugitive, funneling secret data to Israeli and other
intelligence services about some unsavory governments.

Sensational details about Rich's ultimate high-wire act as a spy
for Israel and other countries were provided to The Post as
congressional committees prepare to hold hearings into former
President Bill Clinton's controversial decision to pardon the
fugitive commodities trader.

Among the issues that will be explored by the House Oversight
Committee in its probe of the hotly disputed Rich pardon,
according to congressional sources, are:

* Rich's lengthy relationship with the Israeli Mossad.

* His numerous contacts with federal prosecutors in New York,
during which his lawyers offered to provide intelligence to the
CIA in return for leniency.

A CIA spokesman denied any relationship with Rich and said no one
from the agency participated in behind-the-scenes White House
discussions about his pardon.

But Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Barak repeatedly cited Rich's
contributions to Israel's "national security" in phone calls to
President Clinton last month in which he lobbied for Rich's
pardon, according to Barak spokesman Gadi Baltiansky.

And a letter from former Mossad chief Shabtai Shavit to Clinton
confirming that Rich provided "assistance" to the Israeli spy
agency that produced results "beyond the expected" was among the
documents released last week by Rich's lawyer Jack Quinn to
support the Rich pardon.

"The government of Israel considered Rich a critical ally, and
the president took that seriously when he considered the pardon
request," former White House spokesman Jake Siewert told The
Post.

Rich and partner Pincus Green fled the country in 1983 ahead of
federal charges that they ripped off taxpayers for $48 million.
Both were among the 140 people pardoned or given clemency on
Clinton's last day in office.

A storm of controversy has erupted over the unusual way the Rich
pardon was handled, as well as over the involvement of Rich's
ex-wife, Denise Rich, who raised $1 million for the Democratic
party and gave the Clintons $7,000 in furniture for their new
homes.

Accounts of Rich's life on the lam - provided by former
prosecutors, Rich's lawyers and the Israeli government - sound
like a plot from a James Bond movie as the ruthless and nimble
Rich extended his empire on five continents and built up a
business worth almost $30 billion.

He sold Iranian oil to Israel and Nigerian oil to South Africa.

He brokered the sale of North Korean arms to Iran and did several
deals involving gold, grain, nickel and tin with the Russian
Mafia and henchmen of the former Soviet Union.

And it's now clear that Rich also dealt in the most valuable
commodity of all - information. He used what one of his former
lawyers called a "mammoth information-gathering operation" to
gain entree to governments and to support his businesses.

"He was one of the biggest commodities traders in the world and
had offices and active operations in all sorts of countries. He
had friends in all sorts of places - high and low - and he
certainly was in a position to provide sensitive information from
a number of places," said Martin Auerbach, one of two former
assistant U.S. attorneys who prosecuted Rich and tracked him
throughout the years.

Lawyers close to the case say there is no doubt that Rich had
contacts with spies and security services throughout Europe and
the Middle East. Those contacts not only helped him make money
but may have also helped him stay one step ahead of U.S. lawmen
trying to capture him, lawyers say.

Former New York Police Commissioner Howard Safir said he tried
several times to trap Rich and bring him back to the United
States, when he headed the U.S. Marshals Service, but Rich
constantly eluded the federal dragnet.

Shavit, who headed the Mossad from 1989 to 1996, provided a
fascinating glimpse of Rich's role in the murky netherworld of
spies. In his letter to Clinton released by Quinn's office,
Shavit said that he had a long relationship with Rich.

"We requested his assistance in looking for MIAs and his help in
the rescue and evacuation of Jews from enemy countries," Shavit
wrote.

"Mr. Rich always agreed and used his extensive network of
contacts in these countries to produce results that sometimes
were beyond the expected."

Murkier still were Rich's efforts to become a superspy for the
CIA.

During his intrigue-filled exile, Rich's lawyers made numerous
approaches to government prosecutors, offering intelligence to
the CIA about the terrorists and rogue governments he dealt with
in return for being allowed to return to the United States
without being subjected to a jail sentence, Auerbach said.

"Whether or not he provided the information, it never rose to a
level where it justified any sort of 

[CTRL] WSJ: Invitation to Russian Wanted by Swiss Was a Mistake, U.S. Businessman Says

2001-02-06 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

" The Bush inaugural committee said Mr.  Zenga's $100,000 contribution
was returned after the committee learned that Mr.  Borodin was planning
to attend inaugural events with Mr.  Zenga's invitation.  Mr.  Zenga was
also "asked not to attend" the inauguration or any related events."

February 5, 2001
Business and Finance - Europe


Invitation to Russian Wanted by Swiss Was a Mistake, U.S.  Businessman
Says

By JEANNE WHALEN
Staff Reporter
THE WALL STREET JOURNAL


MOSCOW -- An American businessman who caused a diplomatic flap by
inviting to the U.S.  a Russian official wanted by Swiss
authorities in connection with a money-laundering investigation
said he wanted to discuss business opportunities with the
Russian.

Pavel Borodin, a close ally of Russian President Vladimir Putin,
was arrested at John F.  Kennedy airport in New York on Jan.  17
on a Swiss warrant.  He was traveling to the U.S.  to attend a
George W.  Bush presidential inauguration dinner at the
invitation of V.  James Zenga, an American fund-raiser for the
Bush campaign whose telecommunications company has business in
Russia.

Immediately after the arrest, Mr.  Zenga said Mr.  Borodin had
received the dinner invitation "inadvertently," and denied
knowing Mr.  Borodin or having any business dealings with the
Russian government.

Clarifying the matter in a written statement to The Wall Street
Journal, Mr. Zenga said he had invited Mr.  Borodin and two other
Russian officials "to come to the United States for exploratory
business meetings concerning government projects." But he
repeated that he had never met Mr.  Borodin and that his company,
StarCapital, hadn't intended to invite Mr.  Borodin to the
inauguration dinner.

Mr.  Zenga did meet with Mr.  Borodin's associates after the
arrest to discuss "various telecommunications and infrastructure
projects" in Russia.  One topic of discussion, Mr.  Zenga said,
was a road that Mr. Borodin wants to build from Berlin to Moscow
that would be lined by fiber-optic cables.  Days before flying to
New York, Mr.  Borodin told a news conference in Moscow that the
road project would create "the most pleasant opportunities for
[foreign] investment."

A spokesman for Mr.  Borodin said two Russian officials who
accompanied Mr. Borodin to the U.S.  met with Mr.  Zenga in
Washington to discuss the road project on Jan.  21.

Swiss prosecutors are seeking to question Mr.  Borodin about
allegations that offshore bank accounts he or his family control
received kickbacks totaling more than $25 million (26.7 million
euros) from Swiss-based companies that renovated the Kremlin.
The Swiss issued the arrest warrant in January 2000.  Russian
prosecutors closed their probe into the case in December, saying
there was no evidence of a crime.

Mr.  Borodin, who was property manager for Boris Yeltsin's
Kremlin and now heads an effort to reunite Belarus and Russia,
has in the past denied any wrongdoing and said he has no bank
accounts abroad.  He is currently in a New York jail waiting for
a federal court to decide whether to extradite him to
Switzerland.

Confusion over the source of the dinner invitation had led some
Russian officials and media to speculate that the U.S.  had
purposely lured Mr. Borodin to the U.S. with a fake invitation in
order to arrest him.  Mr.  Zenga said he had "no reason to
believe that the security services of any country used
StarCapital to lure Mr. Borodin to the United States." An
employee in StarCapital's Moscow office had "electronically
manipulated" a dinner invitation meant for another Russian
official and sent it to Mr.  Borodin, Mr.  Zenga said.

Mr.  Zenga contributed $100,000 to the fund-raising committee for
the Bush inaugural.  He and his wife, Robin, contributed $40,000
to the Republican National Committee last year, and $4,000 to the
Bush presidential campaign.

The Bush inaugural committee said Mr.  Zenga's $100,000
contribution was returned after the committee learned that Mr.
Borodin was planning to attend inaugural events with Mr.
Zenga's invitation.  Mr.  Zenga was also "asked not to attend"
the inauguration or any related events.

=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no 

[CTRL] CST: Jackson's protests benefit his family, friends

2001-02-06 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/jess04.html

Jackson's protests benefit his family, friends

February 4, 2001
BY CHUCK NEUBAUER AND ABDON M. PALLASCH
STAFF REPORTERS


The Rev. Jesse L. Jackson Sr. knows when corporations are at
their most generous: when they are seeking federal approval for a
merger.

Faced with objections and protest threats from Jackson, American
multinationals have pledged millions of dollars to Jackson's
charities and multimillion-dollar deals for his designated
minority businesses.

... BEGIN SIDEBAR .

MERGERS AND CONTRIBUTIONS

As telecommunications giants prepared to go before the Federal
Communications Commission in 1998 to seek approval for their
megamergers, Jackson threatened to protest and speak out against
the mergers unless those companies promised that minority
customers and minority business owners shared in the profits from
the mergers. Jackson negotiated with the companies and extracted
donations to his charities and multimillion dollar contracts for
minority-owned businesses, including contracts with companies
that have ties to Jackson family members. Then Jackson endorsed
the mergers and they were approved.

SBC/AMERITECH

1998

* May 14: Jackson urges Pres. Clinton to block the merger.

* Dec. 7: "We are at the table with the merger giants," Jackson
says, warning that he will oppose mergers if the companies do not
pledge diversify.

* Dec. 14: Jackson tells the FCC, "Initially, their proposed
merger plan red lines residential customers" in favor of business
customers. 1999: SBC and Ameritech give $500,000 to Jackson's
CEF.

* Jan. 15: SBC pledges to hire a minority firm to manage its
pension fund.

* March 29: "The merger is in the public interest," Jackson says
in an Ameritech news release touting his endorsement of the
merger.

* April 5: Ameritech announces it will sell its cellular business
to a new partnership of GTE and Jackson colleague Chester
Davenport.

* Oct. 6: The FCC approves the merger.


2000/2001

* Feb 5-16, 2000: Jackson's son Jonathan, representing
Davenport's company, accompanies Jackson on a trip to Africa,
PUSH documents show. GTE/BELL ATLANTIC


1998

* Dec. 7: Jackson says he wants guarantees from GTE and Bell that
minority customers and businesses will profit from the merger.

* Dec. 14: "The Bell Atlantic/GTE plan must include a stronger
commitment to to internet and technology training targeted to the
minority community," Jackson tells the FCC. 1999: Bell Atlantic
and GTE give $1 million to Jackson's CEF.

* Jan. 15: Bell Atlantic pledges to hire a minority firm to
manage its pension fund.

* April 5: GTE agrees to pay vast majority of the $3.3 billion
purchase price for Ameritech's cellular business, but to give
Jackson colleage Chester Davenport a 7 percent stake in the new
venture for $60 million. The new venture will be chaired by
Davenport, but Davenport will have "No operational
responsibility. none."

* May 17: Jackson endorses the Bell Atlantic/GTE merger.

* July 17: The FCC endorses the merger. The new company is called
Verizon.  ATT/TCI


1998

* Dec. 7: Jackson says ATTT and TCI must include minority
business in their merger deal for his support.

* Dec. 14: TCI has a "questionable employment record and a poor
level of public service," Jackson tells the FCC.

* 1999: ATT pledges $425,000 to Jackson's CEF.

* Jan. 15: ATT Chairman Michael Armstrong tells Jackson's Wall
Street conference that his company will hire a minority business
to handle a major bond offering.

* Feb 25: FCC approves merger.

* March 22: ATT chooses Blaylock  Partners, L.P., a minority
firm with close ties to Jackson, to co-manage an $8 billion bond
offering. The deal is worth an estimated $750,000 to the firm.
Jan. 2001: ATT executives address Jackson's Wall Street
conference. CBS/VIACOM


1999: Viacom pledges $680,000 to Jackson's CEF. Viacom's UPN
donates $50,000.

* Sept. 20: Jackson blasts CBS's proposed purchase of Viacom,
saying it would concentrate ownership in too few hands. It would
also violate the federal rule against one company owning two
networks -- CBS and the African-American-oriented UPN.

* Sept. 22: Jackson brings friends Chester Davenport and Percy
Sutton to a meeting with CBS Chairman Mel Karmazin urging him to
sell UPN to a minority owner such as Davenport or Sutton. Jackson
was a founding shareholder in Sutton's Inner City Broadcasting
and his wife still may be a shareholder.

* Sept. 30: Jackson brings Davenport and Sutton to a meeting with
FCC Chairman William Kennard to lobby him not to approve the
merger unless Viacom sells UPN to a minoity owner such as
Davenport or Sutton. Kennard has championed Jackson's arguments
about demanding steps toward diversity by companies trying to
merge. 2000

* Feb. 5-16: Jackson visits Africa on a telecommunications trade
mission. He brings Sutton and his son Jonathan Jackson, who is
representing Davenport.

* May 3: The FCC approves CBS' purchase of Viacom, contingent 

[CTRL] WT: Bush delays new forest regulations

2001-02-06 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.washtimes.com/national/default-200126224026.htm

The Washington Times
www.washtimes.com

Bush delays new forest regulations

by Audrey Hudson
Published 2/6/01


The Bush administration yesterday delayed a rule banning
road-building and most logging in the nation's forests, following
through on its promise to re-examine a slew of regulations issued
by President Clinton during his final days in office.

Mr. Clinton hoped to secure his environmental legacy by
effectively prohibiting natural resources development on 58
million acres of public land.

However, White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card issued a Jan. 20
memo to all agencies requesting that new rules and regulations be
blocked to "ensure that the president's appointees have the
opportunity to review any new or pending regulations."

The action was published yesterday in the Federal Register ,
making it official and delaying implementation of the contentious
rule from March 13 to May 12.

The delay is "necessary to give department officials the
opportunity for further review and consideration of new
regulations consistent with the . . . memo," said Kevin Herglotz,
spokesman for the Agriculture Department.

Mr. Herglotz would not speculate on what, if any, changes would
be made to alter the regulations, which he described as hundreds
of pages of complex technical documents.

"This regulation is in the review process; no decision has been
made at this time," Mr. Herglotz said.

House and Senate Republicans were critical of the Clinton
administration for bypassing Congress and restricting land use
through the federal regulatory process. Republican leaders had
urged Mr. Bush to overturn or delay the rule.

Hundreds of public meetings were held throughout the country on
Mr. Clinton's forest plan, and the U.S. Forest Service received
130,000 public comments on the issue.

Environmentalists supported the ban, but opponents, mostly
Westerners, said it would endanger forest health through
uncontrolled insect infestation.

Lawmakers said new roads are needed to gain access to the woods
to fight forest fires. Last year, 92,000 wildfires swept across
7.3 million acres.

Republicans also said public input was ignored.

They said the outcome of studies by the U.S. Forest Service was
prejudiced from inception to reflect Mr. Clinton's wishes to
limit development and public access to nearly one-third of the
nation's forests.

Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman, Connecticut Democrat, and Rep. Henry A.
Waxman, California Democrat, yesterday sent a letter to the
Office of Management and Budget expressing their concerns over
Mr. Card's memo, which they said could reverse decisions that
protect public land and the environment.

"In our capacity as ranking members on the Senate Governmental
Affairs and House Government Reform Committees, we intend to
closely monitor the implementation of the Card memorandum,
particularly where it applies to measures to protect health and
safety, consumers, and the environment," they said in the letter
to Mitchell E. Daniels, OMB director.

"Although we understand the desire of the incoming administration
to review new and pending regulations, we are concerned that the
Card memorandum could be used to undermine long-needed
safeguards," the letter said.

Meanwhile, the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee
plans to hold hearings to review the process and determine
whether the regulations can be overturned by Congress, said a
committee spokesman.

House Resources Committee Chairman James V. Hansen said his
committee also will "vigorously" review the regulations.

"I will make it a priority to undo this kind of reckless,
last-minute maneuvering," the Utah Republican said after the
final regulation was announced Jan. 4.

"The American people deserve thoughtful, rational policies that
allow local management and public enjoyment of their own lands,"
Mr. Hansen said. "They don't deserve this last-minute
manipulation and grandstanding by a man desperate for a legacy."

Copyright © 2001 News World Communications, Inc. All rights
reserved.

=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests 

[CTRL] Juno

2001-02-06 Thread kl

-Caveat Lector-


 We Know What Juno

 Juno, one of three remaining free Internet service
 providers, already requires subscribers to view ads and
 share market data, but they've come up with a scheme to
 raise more revenue by selling your untapped computing power
 to researchers and corporations. The idea is controversial
 for a lot of reasons, not the least of which is requiring
 subscribers to leave their computers turned on and logged
 in at all times. The software would work much like the
 SETI@home screen saver, which millions of users have
 installed and which crunches SETI numbers when your PC is
 idle. Juno's "agreement" goes much further, though, and it
 involves a measure of control of your computer. Privacy
 advocates are concerned, to say the least.

 Click here to read about Juno's new plans.
 http://abcnews.go.com/sections/scitech/DailyNews/juno_010202.html

 Click here to visit Juno's site.
 http://www.juno.com/index.shtml


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] WP: Another Pardon Stirs Controversy. Herbal Marketer Faces U.S. Tax Evasion Probe

2001-02-06 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

'Braswell "has probably managed to sell more health-related products with
misleading claims than anyone else in the history of the world. His gross
intake has very likely been over a billion dollars"'


Another Pardon Stirs Controversy

Herbal Marketer Faces U.S. Tax Evasion Probe

By Peter Slevin
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, February 6, 2001; Page A03


When President Bill Clinton pardoned 140 people on his final day
in the White House, wealthy herbal remedy marketer A. Glenn
Braswell made the list. Presidential forgiveness covered
Braswell's 1983 convictions for fraud, perjury and tax evasion,
restoring his civil rights.

Yet, even as Clinton was granting Braswell a pardon, federal
investigators were examining what they called "a massive tax
evasion and money-laundering scheme" allegedly conducted by
Braswell and his California dietary supplement empire.

No charges have been filed in the investigation of what a
prosecutor in California court documents describes as an effort
by Braswell to move millions of dollars offshore through a shell
company.

It is not clear whether Clinton was aware of the current criminal
investigation. The former president has not discussed the case,
and efforts to reach him for comment through spokesman Jake
Siewert were unsuccessful.

Justice Department officials would not discuss Braswell's pardon.
Amid the flurry of last-minute pardons and commutations,
Braswell's name was one of about two dozen announced without
details, suggesting that Clinton had left little time for federal
law officers to evaluate Braswell.

Yet, less than four months before his pardon, Braswell invoked
the Fifth Amendment against self-incrimination more than 100
times in a two-hour deposition in a South Carolina civil case,
opposing lawyer Vernon Glenn said yesterday.

After the pardon was announced Jan. 20, federal investigators
worried that Clinton had pardoned Braswell for any criminal
charges that could arise from the current investigation. Assured
yesterday by the Justice Department that the pardon covered only
the 1983 case, Los Angeles prosecutors said they will continue to
pursue the money-laundering and tax matters.

Former Miami U.S. attorney Kendall Coffey, one of former vice
president Al Gore's attorneys in the Florida recount case,
represented Braswell in his effort to obtain a pardon. Coffey did
not return several telephone calls seeking comment. Washington
attorney Gerald Feffer, who represents Braswell in the tax and
money-laundering probe, declined to discuss his client.

Braswell "has probably managed to sell more health-related
products with misleading claims than anyone else in the history
of the world. His gross intake has very likely been over a
billion dollars," said Stephen Barrett, who runs an independent
watchdog organization, Quackwatch.com. "I can't imagine that
anyone who was involved knew what Braswell was all about. If they
did, this is even worse."

In the 16 days since the pardons were announced, Clinton has been
excoriated for his decisions and the last-minute confusion of the
process. In a number of cases, he issued pardons or commutations
without conducting traditional consultations with the Justice
Department.

The pardon of fugitive commodities trader Marc Rich, who
renounced his U.S. citizenship to avoid extradition and trial,
has triggered two Capitol Hill inquiries.

Braswell's companies, including Gero Vita International, sell
herbs and vitamins, and market them through mass mailings and a
company magazine, the Journal of Longevity. Advertisements
proclaim the ability to slow the aging process, cure hereditary
baldness, shrink prostate glands and enlarge breasts, among other
achievements.

Among the doubters are the Food and Drug Administration and the
Federal Trade Commission, which have issued notices critical of
the companies. In 1995, the FDA banned the importation of Gero
Vita products sold on the basis of claims that they can prevent
or treat disease.

The editors of Consumer Reports wrote in 1998: "We see a lot of
misleading marketing, but what spews out of Gero Vita Industries
rivals the worst." They said the company sent glossy booklets
"masquerading as science. The booklets cite actual studies, but
twist the findings to support the company's own unsubstantiated
claims."

"One of the company's most highly hyped products is GH3, a
vitamin and herb medley that costs $29.95 a month," the magazine
continued. "The promotional material calls it an anti-aging
formula. The FDA calls it 'an old health-fraud product.' "

IRS agents raided Braswell's business in Marina Del Rey, Calif.,
in 1999. In a document filed six months later in an unrelated
Santa Monica civil suit, Assistant U.S. Attorney Paul H. Rochmes
accused Braswell of conducting a "massive" scheme to ship money
beyond the reach of U.S. tax authorities.

Rochmes alleged that Braswell, "for his own benefit," created a
shell company and directed payments to the firm for no 

Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-06 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Amelia" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 What a lovely fairy tale you have concocted concerning
 slavery in the northern states!

Dem's da facts, ma'am...I suggest you get yourself a few good books on American 
History...


 Reread my sentence, too. I
 said they EITHER gave them letters of freedom OR just dumped
 them. meaning sold them in the South in an especially timely
 manner, only when it was evident they were going to be freed
 anyway.  Ditto those letters of freedom--only after it was
 imminent anyway.  Hardly the magnanimous gesture you attempt
 to fabricate.

Excuse me, but _I_ am not the one who fabricated the claim in the first place...if YOU 
reread MY sentences,
you will see that I refer to the people involved as 'imaginary'...


 If my sentence makes no sense to you, it is
 your reading deficiency as it is perfectly clear what I have
 stated.

Only in your own 'sleep depraved' [sic] mind...


 There were not that many states admitted in the Missouri
 Compromise and they were Midwestern
 with low populations at the time.

Just ONE free state admitted under the Missouri Compromise negates your claim that 
each and every state of the
union was a slave-holding state at one time...


 New England where you live is where the most slaves were.

And you can back up this claimhow?


 Talk about your revisionist
 history!  Southern slaves were often given letters of
 freedom also and many did not leave their original homes
 even after receiving their letters.

Yes, that claim DOES sound extremely revisionist...


 It had become
 economically unfeasible in the South to maintain large slave
 populations on individual farms and would have been
 eliminated anyway but Lincoln wanted the credit,

If this was true, then why were all those supposedly starving whites still holding 
onto slaves at the time of
the Emancipation Proclamation?  Seems to me that if it was 'economically unfeasible' 
to own slaves even before
the war, all those supposedly starving white slaveowners wouldn't have needed to be 
forced to free them by
Lincoln, they would have just opened the door and told their slaves to get the hell 
out of there...


 The factories of New England wanted the adult
 slaves to replace the children they were using as slaves in
 their factories without the expense of having the cradle to
 grave responsibility of slaves.

Bull.  By the time the Industrial Revolution took hold in the northeast -- and this 
was in the century BEFORE
the Civil War -- slavery was already being legislated out of existence in those states.

The industrialized north had no need of slaves, or even ex-slaves, as there were more 
than enough bodies
immigrating from overseas to work cheaply in the mills and factories...

You spend the time researching the ethnic makeup of those who worked in the northern 
mills and factories at
the time, and you will find that almost none of them employed blacks...first it was 
Irish and German, later it
was Italian, Portuguese, and Russian and eastern European...

That situation lasted until well into the 20th century...blacks didn't start getting 
employed in any numbers
in factories until the early 20th century, and then for the most part only in Detroit 
and Chicago...


 And yes, that is exactly what I am saying,
 that whites shared what food they had with blacks for whom
 they were responsible.

Gee, if big bwanna white massa was so good, it's amazing that any black slave accepted 
being freed...seems to
me those ex-slaves would have immediately voted to reinstitute slavery, since 
according to you they had it so
good...


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida vote

2001-02-06 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

Now if the World Socialist website says Gore won, we have a deposed King
sitting on the sidelines that nobody wants and the more they see this
stuffed turkey the more they wish he would go home to Russia to roost
with David Duke.

I put Duke, Clinton, Gore, Putin all in the same camp.David Duke was
no Klansman - and now he is in Russia taking on Russian Jews?

Keep remembering this Jewish Mafia bunch in Columbus with all that neo
nazi literatuare in their basements..imposters - but it does look
like turkies do go home to roost.so look at Gores friends -

World Socialists?   More like World Losers?

Bye Bye Blackbirds..there they go.

Take Jesse too

Saba

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-06 Thread Aleisha Saba

-Caveat Lector-

I had a great great etc grandfather who had 100 some slaves and in his
will he gave them their freedom but one old man was allowed to live on
the farm until he died, by name of Sam who was a personal butler type of
man.

So goodbye and good riddance..has Lincoln not been shot he was going
to return most to Africa and in fact did..

Think what America would be like today without these racial problems?
Like Joe Lieberman said, quoting Jesus Christ in the New Testament maybe
God in the old - the poor you have with you always.

So class tells - you have the race horse and you have the mule..you
have the thorough breds and you have Al Sharpton and Jesse
Jacksonyou have the Queen Bees and you have the drones.

So what the cotton gin did to free the slaves and blacks from mundane
task of picking cotton the computer will not do to those who think they
are computer genius - many who cannot even type - and when compters are
all talk operated that just leaves the brain to call the shots.

Ah but the computer does know know the difference between loose and lose
and council and counsel and read and red and bred as in well bred and
bread.

So we will still need a few honkies like June with her dictionary and
word of the day club to be sure, the computer and robot operators do not
look too stupid.

So no use for slaves anymore.not much use for a lot of
peoplegoing out of style.

Bet you wish they had lots of clones of Henry Kissinger, even though
they would eat us out of house and home?

Now then I have a pedigree cat and a pit bull who get along fine.a
junk yard dog with a black nose and a siamese with beautiful blue
eyes..and all my children have blonde hair and blue eyes and there
will always be a demand for blonde haired blue eyed kids

Not much demand for mules.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: ALL SIDES NOW COMMITTED TO ESCALATION

2001-02-06 Thread Aleisha Saba

So be sure not to hurt the corn, the oil, and the wineand above all
the oil.

And if they dare attack arab nations in attempt to take oil would do
well to consider all those oil fields are wired nd ready to blow.So
how would they like them apples

God gave that oil to Ishmael...and made him a great nation - and
where there is oil, you find water which is more precious, than the oil.




   ___      __
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\ Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\http://www.MiddleEast.Org

  News, Information,  Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
 and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
  IF YOU DON'T GET MER, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!
 To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




 ALL SIDES NOW COMMITTED TO ESCALATION

MID-EAST REALITIES  - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 2/06:
Now the real craziness begins.  The Palestinians are committed to heating things
up to demonstrate their resolve and their capabilities.  The Israelis are committed
to "stopping the violence" which means clamping the boot down on the Palestinians
even more harshly -- and even Shimon Peres has already announced he is eager
to join a Sharon "national unity" government.  The Americans are tied to the
Israelis for good or bad; their military forces are on alert and military supplies,
including Patriot missiles, are already flowing into Israel under various covers.
 And the Arabs remain too weak, divided, and co-opted to do anything serious;
fearing more than loathing Israel.  It's all a powderkeg waiting for ignition;
and the two articles that follow help set the stage for whatever is now to
come:


 FEAR SPURS VOTERS INTO ARMS OF SHARON

Palestinian threats help to seal
 the prime minister's expected
   political doom

[The Guardian - Suzanne Goldberg in Jerusalem, Tuesday February 6]:
Palestinian militants said last night that they were poised to attack
targets in Israel on the eve of today's election, which is expected to make
Ariel Sharon the country's next prime minister.

The warning came as Israeli soldiers tried to tighten their grip on the
West Bank and Gaza Strip before the "day of rage" which leaders of Yasser
Arafat's Fatah movement say marks the start of an intensification of the
four-month uprising.

The army fired rocket-propelled grenades into the Palestinian refugee camp
of Rafah, on the border between Gaza and Egypt, after an Israeli soldier on
his way to vote in the early ballot staged for the army was killed by a
bullet fired from the camp.

Israel also shut down the Palestinian airport in Gaza and the Rafah
crossing to Egypt.

Police reinforcements were moved to the northern towns in Galilee, where a
call for Israeli Arabs to boycott the election could lead to clashes.

With yesterday's opinion polls showing him leading the incumbent prime
minister, Ehud Barak, by as much as 22 points, Mr Sharon could be stepping
into a ready-made confrontation.

Yesterday he was challenged not only by the Fatah militias, which have led
the protests in the West Bank and Gaza, but also by the militant group
Islamic Jihad, which has claimed responsibility for at least two car
bombings in Israel in the past four months.

"Our operations will continue and increase. We will carry out powerful
blows against the criminal entity within the coming few days," Islamic
Jihad said in a statement delivered before yesterday's funeral of a bomber
who was shot dead trying to scale the fence sealing off Gaza.

"No barriers, wire fences, or security measures will prevent us from
carrying out painful strikes against the enemy."

In the West Bank city of Ramallah, meanwhile, an important Fatah leader
declared that the Palestinians would give no quarter to Mr Sharon.

Hussein Sheikh, who commands Fatah's militiamen in the West Bank, said:
"The next days and weeks are going to be hard, and the area will witness an
escalation in the field.

"We have declared a general state of emergency and we have orders to
escalate the intifada."

Mr Barak spent the final moments of his campaign yesterday warning Israelis
that the former general Sharon could lead them into a war.

"The Middle East is a powder keg," he wrote in the Yediot Ahronoth,
Israel's best-selling paper.

"We are being called to decide whether to give the match to extremists,
people who are too extreme for Israel. We are being called to decide
whether between us and peace lies another bloody war."

But Israelis seemed to be in no mood to listen. After four months of
bloodshed in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, people have lost faith not only
in Mr Barak but in the entire seven years of negotiations started by the
assassinated prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, according to research published
yesterday by the 

[CTRL] Hold on to your right to speak freely

2001-02-06 Thread kl

-Caveat Lector-

http://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/opinion/columnists/orl-oped-
reese06020601.column

Charley Reese
Hold on to your right to speak freely

If you criticize affirmative action or attempt to defend the South's
history against slanders, you will be called a racist.

If you criticize Israel's brutal treatment of the Palestinians, you will be
called an anti-Semite.

If you defend the Boy Scouts' right to exclude homosexuals, you will
be called a homophobe.

If you defend the right of unborn children to live, you will be called a
sexist.

If you are a Christian with firm convictions about your faith, you will be
called an extremist.

All of these are examples of what logicians call argumentum ad
hominem. Instead of dealing with the issue that was raised, you simply
attack the person who raised it. It has become common in this age of
special-interest groups and bitter partisanship.

You should be concerned. I say you because I am a genetic contrarian
and will continue to say what I think without regard for who purports to
be offended by it. I am contemptuous of name-callers but otherwise
pay them no attention. I am also contemptuous of people easily
intimidated by special-interest groups.

Every American should pause and think of the brave people in other
countries unafraid to speak the truth not just to power but to cruelty,
murder and torture. How can any American shrink from a mere verbal
confrontation?

The American model of self-government devised by the Founding
Fathers is a whole concept. If parts of it are destroyed, the whole of it
is destroyed.

Freedom of speech and assembly are guaranteed because they are
absolutely necessary for self-government. If you are denied information
or if certain subjects are declared to be off-limits for debate, then you
will no longer be able to participate in self-government. Your freedom
will have been stolen. You will be governed all right, but not by yourself
and a majority of your fellow citizens.

There should be no topic -- and I mean no topic -- that Americans
cannot discuss and debate publicly and in full without being subjected
to attempted intimidation by character assassination.

If there is one thing that should be totally absent from American life, it
is fear on the part of an honest citizen to exercise his rights.

The only way to achieve that is for all citizens to make a firm
commitment to defend freedom of speech. Freedom of speech, by the
way, is really freedom of thought. There is no right of any government
or group to dictate what a person thinks.

In truth there is no reason why any topic, however contentious, cannot
be discussed in a civil manner, except for the malice of certain groups.
Whenever people reveal themselves to be uninterested in discussion,
they should be shunned by civilized people. They are following the
totalitarian model in which one's opponents are not bested in
arguments but shouted down, intimidated and, in the end, coerced into
silence.

Unfortunately, television is the demagogue's medium. Television hosts
like the drama of insults and loud voices. Here again, Americans
should shun such shows and complain to the employers and
advertisers.

Americans frankly have not been that good at defending their basic
rights, simply because they have been unwilling to defend those rights
when they are being exercised by someone with whom they disagree.
That is a fatal attitude.

Unless everyone is free to speak, everyone else's freedom is in
jeopardy. We don't have to agree, but we do have to learn to disagree
without going to war.

Copyright  2001, Orlando Sentinel











--

CONGRESS.SYS Corrupted:  Re-boot Washington D.C (Y/n)?

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fw: Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-06 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

June,
I suggest you read the following historical document taken
from the archives of your own state.  Note none of the 7-12
years as you stated and and the slaves were "without wage."
This is the exact opposite of your claim.  Of course I am
not talking about the legislation leading to the actual
outbreak of war but going back a bit to the way things were
in northern states from the last of the 1600 until around
1800.  Your description bears no resemblance to the truth of
the matter.  This petition, which the governor did not even
bother to present to the legislature states that the slaves
in Connecticut were born in this country in slavery and died
in slavery without wages.  This is the guilt which you
attempt to project onto the south alone as though these
things did not happen in the north but they most certainly
did.  I suggest you get yourself a history book as you are
full of false information and revisionist claims.  You often
stat the you are all for truth but you post fabrications.
Of course later situations changed because otherwise the
north would have been fighting itself.  And counting
conditions in territories at the outbreak of war has nothing
to do with the fact that slavery existed in the states that
were states prior to al the legislation and conflicts
beginning.  The document is posted below which tells the
truth of this "benevolent" northern slavery which you
fabricate.
Amelia

 Documents menu



Petition of 1780 by slaves
for the abolition of slavery in Connecticut

Unto your Honner the govener and all the wise men of the
State of Connecticut which it hath Plesed god to Permit to
gather at Hartford unto you we the the Poor and opresed
Negro Sarvents of this Town By and with the advice of Each
other and By the Desier of all the Negro Sarvents in this
State Do in a most humble maner Criy unto you for Liberty
alltho we have Desiered this faver from your honners Time
after Time yet we are Not Discuriged But Do Still intend to
Beag this faver from Time to Time tho you Should not grant
us our Desiers this Time -

We are all of us the Same mind as we was when we asked this
advantige of your honners Last may that our marsters have no
more Rite to make us Searve them then we have to make our
Marsters Searve us and we have Resen to wonder that our Case
has not Ben taken into Consideration So fare as to Grant us
our Libertys But we must consider what the Book of
Eceleisastes says at 8 Chapter  at the 11 varce Because
Sentence aganst an Evel work is not Executed Speedily
theirfore the hart of the Sons of men is fully Set in them
to do Evel - and for this Reson we Think our Cause is Not
Regarded and we Still must Say as Jeremiah Says in his
Lamentations at the 5 Chapter  at the 5 varce Our necks are
under Persecution we Labour and have no rest - But we are in
good hopes that your honners will Take Notis of our Case and
Do unto us as you would be Glad that we Should Do unto you
if we was in your Condishon and you in ours But it hath
Plesed god to Place us in the Sitawaytion we are now in But
we Pray to god that he would Send forth his Good Spirit into
your harts and Remind you of your Duty and make you the
Instermints of Binding up the Brokenharted and of
Proclaiming Liberty to the Captives and the opening of the
Prison to them that are Bound We ask your good Will to Look
upon us and we Criy unto you in the words of Job at the 19
Chapter  at the 21 varce Have Pity upon me have Pity upon
me o ye my frindes - But we Still Look unto god Who
Pursarves Both the Servent and the marster for we Know that
in the 140 Psalm at the 12 varces That we have a Sartin
Promos viz. I Know that the Lord will maintain the Cause of
the afflicted and the Right of the Poor and we think that it
is time for us to Criy aloud for our Liberty for No Son of
man will give his Sarvent his Time unless he Thinks that he
Dos Roung in Keeping off him and So Considers that their is
a wa Ppurnounced aganst those that Take a way their
Neighbours Servise with wages and giveth him Not for his
work Jeremiah at the 22 Chapter  at the 13 varce wo unto
him that Buildeth his house By Unriteousness and without
wages and giveth him Not for his work and when their is a
man that will give his Searvent his Liberty we must think
that he Considers what the word of God Says in the 34
Chapter and the 10 varces of the Book of Jeremiah viz. Now
when all the Princes and all the people which had Entered
into the Covenent heard that Every one Should Let his maid
Searvent and Every one his man Servent go free that None
Should Serve themselves of them any more then they obeyed
and Let them go and We wish that all our marsters would
consider the word of God as Job Did and Consider the Cause
of his man Servent and of his maid Servent when we Contend
with our marsters But we Cant find Such men as will other
give or Sell ous Liberty  we all Both young and old Do ask

[CTRL] Fw: [CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida

2001-02-06 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

Yes, Steve, Gore will always be a winner with the communists
and socialists as they march us right along to the gulag.
It seems to all be a matter of perception and very
subjective.  That is why no accurate count can be made of
ballots long after the fact of the election.
Amelia

- Original Message -
From: "Steve Wingate" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 3:57 AM
Subject: [CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won
Florida


 -Caveat Lector-

 --- Forwarded message follows ---
 Date sent:  Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:27:35 -0800
 From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Subject:SNET: Newspaper studies confirm
Democrat Gore won Florida vote
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Copies to:  Cosmic Comentary
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]


 World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org
 WSWS : News  Analysis : North America : US Politics

 Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida vote

 By Patrick Martin
 5 February 2001

 Two newly published studies of the ballots cast in the US
presidential
 election confirm that Democrat Al Gore was the choice of
more Florida
 voters than Republican George W. Bush, who was installed
as president
 after an unprecedented and anti-democratic intervention by
the US
 Supreme Court.

 One study was conducted by the Washington Post, the other
by Tribune
 Co., which owns the Chicago Tribune, the Orlando Sentinel,
and the Fort
 Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel. The Post endorsed Gore
editorially in the
 November election, while the Tribune endorsed Bush.


A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Slaves in New Hampshire

2001-02-06 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

It appears these articles were written even later, well into
the 1800's.  Note the racist refeences to lack of intellect.
Also note that no Declaration of Emancipati9on was EVER made
in New Hampshire and they were only freed exactly when those
in the South were freed,  despite the fabrications of some
people to the contrary and that the states on the North were
all kindness and light to slaves.  Thank goodness for the
internet!
Amelia

"In the days when slavery was common in New England,
Portsmouth had a large proportion of the slaves held in the
State"
Slaves in New Hampshire

By Charles W. Brewster

Editors Note: C.W. Brewster was a Portsmouth columnist in
the mid-1800's. This article includes his opinions and may
not reflect current research or current values. Click here
to go to the Black History theme site.
JDR

In the days when slavery was common in New England,
Portsmouth had a large proportion of the slaves held in the
State. There were in this town, in 1767, one hundred and
twenty-four male and sixty-three female slaves. Their
masters were generally kind to them, and they were permitted
not only to enjoy their own social meetings, but were aided
in sustaining a mock government among themselves.

There were Negroes of distinction then, and there was nearly
as much ebony as topaz gloss on the face of society. Among
the top of the Negro quality in former times, was Cyrus
Bruce, for many years the waiter on Gov. Langdon. There
could scarcely be found in Portsmouth, not excepting the
Governor himself, one who dressed more elegantly or
exhibited a more gentlemanly appearance. His heavy gold
chain and seals, his fine black or blue broadcloth coat and
small clothes, his silk stockings and silver-buckled shoes,
his ruffles and carefully plaited linen, are well remembered
by many of the present generation.

Some of the blacks were good mechanics. The parlor of the
house of the late Richard Hart, on Russell street, was
handsomely finished by Caesar, a house slave. Prime Fowle
was the pressman of the first paper printed in New
Hampshire. Through long service in bending over the press,
he was bent to an angle of about forty-five degrees. He
mourned the loss of his mistress and called her an old fool
for dying. At funerals, it was the custom for the Negroes of
the family to walk at the left hand of each white survivor,
among the chief mourners. At the funeral of Mrs. Fowle,
Prime should have gone on the left of his master, but he
went on the right. His master whispered, "Go the other
side." Prime did not move. His master touched him and
whispered again, "Go the other side." This was too much. The
old peppery Negro sputtered out, as loud as he could, "Go
tudder side ye sef, y e mean jade."

Cuffee Chase, brother of Dinah Whipple, was of a resentful
spirit, and could not easily forgive an injury. His master's
horse bit him one day, and Cuffee in return deprived him for
several days of his food, and had almost starved the animal
before the family discovered the cause of his failure. The
slave of Rev. Joseph Stevens, of Kittery, had a better
apology for a similar act. His master, as he saw him picking
some bones for dinner which had been already well trimmed,
said to him, "Nearer the bone the sweeter the meat, Sambo."
Not long after, he was sent to the pasture with the horse of
a visiting clergyman, which he tied to a pile of rocks. To a
reproof for the act, Sambo replied, " Nearer the bone, the
sweeter the meat - nearer the rock, the sweeter the grass,
massa."

Jonathan Warner had several slaves, among them Peter. One
day Peter's hat being the worse for wear, he asked his
master for a better covering for his head. "If you will make
a rhyme, Peter, you shall have a new hat," said his master.
This was discouraging to Peter, for he was never guilty of
such a thing in his life. He left in a very thoughtful mood,
and at length resolved to get assistance in his difficulty.
He goes to the office of Wyseman Claggett, and states his
case, "What is your name? " asked the counselor. "Peter
Warner, massa."

"Peter Warner - threw his hat in the chimney corner," said
Mr. C. playfully. "There is your rhyme, now go and get your
new hat." Peter went home, repeating the rhyme all the way,
and hastened to the parlor. "Massa, I've got the rhyme."
said he, much elated. "Well, say it."

"Peter Warner - took off his hat and threw it - in the
fireplace."

Peter received his hat, his master remarking that it was
nearer to a rhyme than he expected of him.

Some slaves had intellect somewhat inferior to Peter's.
Dinah, a slave in the family of Samuel Ham, on Freeman's
point, could not count five. In planting corn, she would put
in the hole three kernels, and then two. she could count no
higher.

The slaves were permitted to hold their social meetings, and
had a mock government of their own, as above stated. For
many years they held their annual elections in June, usually
on Portsmouth Plains. They elected a King, (who was 

Re: [CTRL] Fw: [CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida

2001-02-06 Thread Samantha L.

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 2/6/01 11:44:55 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  That is why no accurate count can be made of
  ballots long after the fact of the election.

HAHAHA!!!  Too bad GW, his lawyers, and his slaves (the US SC) prevented a
count SHORTLY after the election.

Samantha

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] FW:An astonishing letter of support for WBAI

2001-02-06 Thread Nessie

-Caveat Lector-

From:Eileen Sutton
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Fwd: {FP} An astonishing letter of support for WBAI
Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

From: "Lyn Gerry" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2001 01:37:59 -0500
Subject: {FP} An astonishing letter of support for WBAI

Dear All,

A very astonishing letter which I received. If this writer is who he
says he is, that Pacifica should need a lesson in free speech from a guy
who wrote speeches for Guiliani, and who understands what Pacifica's
mission is about a whole lot more thanPacifica's so- called "leadership"
is truly tragic.

Lyn

--- Forwarded message follows ---

From:   Alex Steinberg
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:   distribute freely
To the Pacifica Foundation board of directors:

I am a pro-life, pro-free enterprise, pro-Bush conservative, writing to
ask why you have decided to betray the Pacifica mission.

What honest conservatives, honest liberals and honest radicals all
understand -- but you sadly fail to -- is that a threat to free speech
anywhere is a threat to free speech everywhere.

I have listened to WBAI-FM in New York for the past 19 years. And though
I share its editorial viewpoint next to never, it is an invaluable
source of news, commentary and culture that cannot be found anywhere
else in the media.

Yet some would water that down.

Your firings, bans, and indeed arrests of personnel at WBAI -- besides
flying in the face of anybody's notion of freedom -- run counter to the
wishes of the vast majority of listeners who support the station. As a
result, it seems inescapably obvious that Pacifica's tendentious,
unstated goal is for listeners to withhold their financial
contributions, thus leading to the station's demise, so that you can
then sell the transmitter and claim the station was unsupported by its
audience.

If what you have done to silence voices at WBAI offends a former
Giuliani speechwriter like me, then I can only imagine how deeply and
personally it must offend the other 99.9 percent of the audience whose
politics lean far to the left. That a listener-supported radio station
offers exclusively leftist points of view -- without any commercial
interruption or interference -- accrues not only to the intellectual
benefit of leftists, but to the intellectual benefit of *everybody.*

As for journalist Amy Goodman, whom your Web site takes fatuous pains to
disparage, she possesses in her pinky finger more credibility, integrity
and courage than any of you ever will. Until recently, she also had
colleagues boasting the very same characteristics -- but you
unceremoniously fired them. And you're clearly trying to make conditions
unbearable for Ms. Goodman presently, so that she'll leave too.

I ask respectfully: What kind of radio network that fancies itself
dedicated to free speech imposes gag orders on its own on-air staff?

The question at hand is not whether you have the right to do what you've
done to WBAI. The station, after all -- at present -- belongs to
Pacifica. Rather, the question is whether it was the *right thing to do*
(and whether you'll have the wisdom and decency to undo it).

In the event these questions strike you as exceedingly weighty or
complex, then perhaps you ought consider resigning, en masse,
immediately. You clearly misapprehend what it means to appreciate
community radio.

I eagerly await your thoughtful reply.

Sincerely,
Alexander Steinberg
White Plains, New York

--- End of forwarded message ---


http://www.radio4all.org
http://www.radio4all.org/freepacifica
Public PGP Block: http://www.radio4all.org/pgp/
-
/*This message comes via the freepac list. */
http://savewbai.tao.ca
To unsubscribe from this
list
email [EMAIL PROTECTED] with:
unsubscribe savewbai   or visit http://lists.tao.ca

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

[CTRL] Fw: [CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida

2001-02-06 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

Wrong.  Two recounts took place.  End of story.  Get over
it.
Ake
- Original Message -
From: "Samantha L." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 11:54 AM
Subject: Re: [CTRL] Fw: [CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm
Democrat Gore won Florida


 -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 2/6/01 11:44:55 AM Central Standard
Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

   That is why no accurate count can be made of
   ballots long after the fact of the election.

 HAHAHA!!!  Too bad GW, his lawyers, and his slaves (the US
SC) prevented a
 count SHORTLY after the election.

 Samantha



A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Jehovah's Witnesses' policy on child molesters attacked

2001-02-06 Thread Smart News

-Caveat Lector-

Dear List,

Below please find information on this article.

Sincerely,  Neil Brick



from http://www.courier-journal.com/localnews/2001/02/04/ky_jeh.html

Jehovah's Witnesses' policy on child molesters attacked - Church says it
follows laws on reporting suspected abuse By Peter Smith, the Courier-journal
- Louisville, Ky (2/4/01) by Peter Ackerman, Asbury Park Press  "The
Jehovah's Witnesses church is under growing attack by some of its members for
policies they say can allow child molesters to go unreported, putting church
members and the public at increased risk. Church officials say elders alert
authorities to suspected abuse in states that require reporting. But in other
states they prefer to take steps to protect children that don't breach what
they see as confidential communication between elders and members. Church
policy also allows some confessed molesters -- whose offenses are usually
kept secret -- to stay in the church community, sometimes with tragic
results."

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] article related to secret weapons book

2001-02-06 Thread Smart News

-Caveat Lector-

Dear List,

An article written in smart newsletter was written by one of the sister's
that helped write the book below.

Sincerely,  Neil Brick

This may be heavy for survivors of abuse to read.


the article is at : http://members.aol.com/SMARTNEWS/Sample-Issue-13.htm

"Dear S.M.A.R.T. 1/97 - I am an alleged survivor of
Masonic/Rosicrucian/German-Aryan/Satanic ritual abuse; quite possibly, they
may have even been the Illuminati. My father was allegedly a secret member of
the Masonic Temple and Rosicrucians. Most members were allegedly of German
heritage, using German language/terms during the rituals, and espousing Aryan
looks and supremacy. Leaders had to be referred to as "Master", "Kaiser",
Kaiserin", the "Koa" and "templar Kadosh". As of yet, I cannot remember what
they called themselves; I refer to them as "die Familie" ("the family" in
German)."



This may be heavy for survivors to read.
"Secret Weapons - Two Sisters' Terrifying True Story of Sex, Spies and
Sabotage" Cheryl and Lynn Hersha with Dale Griffis, Ph D. and Ted Schwartz.
New Horison Press, P O Box 669 Far Hills, NJ 07931 - ISBN 0-88282-196-2

"By the time Cheryl Hersha came to the facility, knowledge of multiple
personality was so complete that doctors understood how the mind separated
into distinct ego states, each unaware of the other. First, the person
traumatized had to be both extremely intelligent and under the age of seven,
two conditions not yet understood though remaining consistent as factors. The
trauma was almost always of a sexual nature..." p. 52

"The government researchers, aware of the information in the professional
journals, decided to reverse the process (of healing from hysteric
dissociation). They decided to use selective trauma on healthy children to
create personalities capable of committing acts desired for national security
and defense." p. 53 - 54

The book also contains a variety of documents on mk-ultra and different
projects as well as reports to the Presidential Committee on Radiation and
Mind Control, including information on the Canadian lawsuit against the U.S.
Government.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Fwd: Canada testing woman feared to have Ebola

2001-02-06 Thread Carl Amedio
In a message dated 2/6/01 2:05:26 PM Central Standard Time, AOL News writes:


Subj:Canada testing woman feared to have Ebola
Date:2/6/01 2:05:26 PM Central Standard Time
From:AOL News
BCC:Ahab42



Canada testing woman feared to have Ebola

TORONTO, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Canadian health officials fear that a sick woman
who landed in Toronto on Saturday from a central African country, and is
now isolated in a Hamilton hospital, could be the first person in North
America to be infected with the deadly Ebola virus

For the full text of this story, click here.

To edit your profile, go to keyword NewsProfiles.
For all of today's news, go to keyword News.




Canada testing woman feared to have Ebola

TORONTO, Feb 6 (Reuters) - Canadian health officials fear that a sick woman who landed 
in Toronto on Saturday from a central African country, and is now isolated in a 
Hamilton hospital, could be the first person in North America to be infected with the 
deadly Ebola virus

For the full text of this story, A 
HREF="aol://4344:30.L100VfbU.7223600.665939526"click here/A.

To edit your profile, go to keyword A HREF="aol://1722:NewsProfiles"NewsProfiles/A.
For all of today's news, go to keyword A HREF="aol://1722:News"News/A.




[CTRL] Cancer: De(p)leted case [STOPNATO.ORG.UK]

2001-02-06 Thread Mrs. Jela Jovanovic



STOP NATO: ¡NO PASARAN! - 
HTTP://WWW.STOPNATO.ORG.UK--- ListBot Sponsor 
-- Start Your Own FREE Email List at 
http://www.listbot.com/links/joinlb 
--{PRIVATE}6th 
February 2001  {HYPERLINK 
"../index.htm"}Depleted Uranium 
Watch  
Cancer: De(p)leted casePiotr Bein, {HYPERLINK 
"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"}[EMAIL PROTECTED], 
Vancouver, Canada Media coverage of the depleted uranium (DU) 
scandal raises more questions and suspicions than it provides answers and 
comfort. Why leukemia and not other diseases, and why afflicted peacekeepers and 
not civilians? Why Western European and not Yugoslav soldiers? Yugoslav troops 
were on the ground, breathing air spiked with DU particles, while NATO personnel 
played joystick war from bombers flying safely above the clouds. Leukemia is 
a disease of the blood-forming organs. "Its cause is unknown but it is 
considered to be of the same nature as that of various other forms of cancer 
[...] Probably many factors lead to its development. One that is clearly 
established is exposure to irradiation," states a 1960 encyclopedia, while one 
from 1996 added half a dozen causes. There is no doubt that the disease is a 
form of cancer: "An almost uniformly fatal cancerous disease characterized by 
excessive production of white blood cells," according to the Random House 
dictionary. NATO and the media first emphasized "leukemia" cases from the 
Balkans. This was as significant as invoking miscellaneous chemical and social 
factors as possible causes of soldiers' deaths and illnesses from DU. The 
military did not examine all cases and also hid evidence, so it's likely 
leukemia was not the main cause of death. Most probably, the mounting evidence 
of non-leukemic cases made NATO switch abruptly on January 24th, 2001, from the 
broken record of "no link between DU and leukemia" to "no link between DU and 
any forms of cancer." This was the first indirect indication by NATO that 
not just "leukemia" cases may be involved and that NATO was preparing a 
disinformation campaign against that incriminating fact. "{HYPERLINK 
"../petrovich/dangerous.htm"}Dangerous at any 
speed" fittingly catches the dominant 
characteristics of DU, but not any that are listed by standard NATO sources. The 
analogy with car risks does not arouse comparable concern from medical 
scientists, doctors and health policy bureaucrats on NATO's payroll. When it 
comes to cars and traffic accidents, everyone is an expert. On DU, it seems, 
mainly an army of NATO propagandists and a handful of true scientists have 
spoken out in an information war between government lies and the medical and 
scientific truth. German nuclear physicist Hans-Peter {HYPERLINK 
"http://groups.yahoo.com/group/du-watch/message/55"}Schnelb 
õgl considers depleted uranium (DU) to be 
"highly dangerous both because of its radiological and chemical toxicity. [...] 
DU is millions of times more dangerous than it was in the original uranium ore 
because of its modified consistency [in form of, among others] dispersible fine 
powder. All these forms have the ability to enter the human body via inhalation 
or the food chain, which is a precondition for [...] alpha radiation to become 
effective, as well as chemical toxicity. In contrast, the uranium in the uranium 
ore has very little chance to get inside the human body." If Not Benzene, 
Why Not Lead? Leukemia was initially highlighted because it would be a 
convenient {HYPERLINK "http://www.stopnato.org.uk/du-watch/bein/psyops.htm"}PsyOp 
tool for diverting public attention from 
other DU illnesses. Since many factors besides DU could cause leukemia, it 
became an opportune "theme" to fool the public with. NATO will not admit that 
they spread most of the other "factors" in the course of recent wars. 
Whether from DU or from other pollution, veterans from NATO's toxic- nuclear 
wars, and civilians living downwind from affected battlefields, are getting sick 
and dying. Which of the 'leukemia' cases come from Kosovo, and which ones date 
to the 1994-95 Bosnia war? Also foggy are figures on total military casualties 
attributable to the Balkan Syndrome. NATO should not and can not be trusted to 
provide reliable figures. Would anyone sane entrust, for example, the tobacco 
industry to conduct investigations of lung cancer causation? Lack of 
published data on the Balkan Syndrome among Bosnia- Herzegovina and Kosovo 
civilians is an outright scandal, for which the UN and NATO administrations are 
as responsible as their local counterparts. The Balkan Syndrome, investigated 
under such auspices, would be managed like the Gulf War Syndrome was earlier: 
denial, blaming "other factors", manipulation of reports, criminal neglect of 
sick veterans, wrong medical examination procedures, hiding medical records, and 
indifference to the fate of local populations. The cause of 

[CTRL] Cicero's Six Human Mistakes

2001-02-06 Thread Mark McHugh

-Caveat Lector-

via Classic Quotes, a Yahoo group
~


Marcus Tullius Cicero, the great Roman orator who died in 43 B.C.,
recorded what he considered to be the six most drastic mistakes made
by us humans.  Some things never change:

1.  The delusion that individual advancement is made by crushing
others.

2.  The tendency to worry about things that cannot be changed.

3.  Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot do it
ourselves.

4.  Refusing to set aside trivial preferences.

5.  Neglecting development and refinement of the mind, and not
acquiring the habits of reading and study.

6.  Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Securing the National Homeland

2001-02-06 Thread radman

-Caveat Lector-

Road Map for National Security: Imperative for Change
SECURING THE NATIONAL HOMELAND
__

http://cryptome.org/nssg3-01.htm
1 February 2001
Source: http://www.nssg.gov/phaseIII.pdf (1.5MB, 149 pages)

The Phase III Report of the U.S. Commission on National Security/21st
Century [excerpt]

January 31, 2001

U.S. Commission on National Security/21st Century
Gary Hart; Co-Chair; Warren B. Rudman, Co-Chair

Commissioners

Anne Armstrong; Norman R. Augustine; John Dancy; John R. Galvin; Leslie H.
Gelb; Newt Gingrich; Lee H. Hamilton; Lionel H. Olmer; Donald B. Rice;
James Schlesinger; Harry D. Train; Andrew Young

Securing the National Homeland

The combination of unconventional weapons proliferation with the
persistence of international terrorism will end the relative
invulnerability of the U.S. homeland to catastrophic attack. A direct
attack against American citizens on American soil is likely over the next
quarter century. The risk is not only death and destruction but also a
demoralization that could undermine U.S. global leadership. In the face of
this threat, our nation has no coherent or integrated governmental
structures.

We therefore recommend the creation of a new independent National Homeland
Security Agency (NHSA) with responsibility, for planning, coordinating, and
integrating various U.S. government activities involved in homeland
security. NHSA would be built upon the Federal Emergency Management Agency,
with the three organizations currently on the front line of border security
-- the Coast Guard, the Customs Service, and the Border Patrol --
transferred to it. NHSA would not only protect American lives, but also
assume responsibility for overseeing the protection of the nation's
critical infrastructure, including information technology.

The NHSA Director would have Cabinet status and would be a statutory
advisor to the National Security Council. The legal foundation for the
National Homeland Security Agency would rest firmly within the array of
Constitutional guarantees for civil liberties. The observance of these
guarantees in the event of a national security emergency would be
safeguarded by NHSA's interagency coordinating activities-which would
include the Department of Justice-as we] I as by its conduct of advance
exercises.

The potentially catastrophic nature of homeland attacks necessitates our
being prepared to use the tremendous resources of the Department of Defense
(DoD). Therefore, the department needs to pay far more attention to this
mission in the future. We recommend that a new office of Assistant
Secretary, for Homeland Security be created to oversee the various DoD
activities and ensure that the necessary resources are made available.

New priorities also need to be set for the U.S. armed forces in light of
the threat to the homeland. We urge, in particular, that the National Guard
be given homeland security as a primary mission, as the U.S. Constitution
itself ordains. The National Guard should be reorganized, trained, and
equipped to undertake that mission.

Finally, we recommend that Congress reorganize itself to accommodate this
Executive Branch realignment, and that it also, form a special select
committee, for homeland security to provide Congressional support and
oversight in this critical area.

CRYPTOME
Administrator: John Young
251 West 89th Street
New York, NY 10024
Tel: (US) 011-212-873-8700
Fax: (US) 011-212-787-6102
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web: http://www.cryptome.org
- Thursday, 1 February 2001 -

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] HOW RICH! BUSH, RICH AND SOROS JOINED AT THE HIPS.

2001-02-06 Thread William Shannon
http://www.newsmakingnews.com/



HOW RICH! BUSH, RICH AND SOROS JOINED AT THE HIPS. 
The Republicans want Congress to investigate Clinton's pardon of Marc Rich -- 
are they suicidal?

Republicans are pushing for a Congressional investigation of Clinton's pardon 
of Marc Rich.  An investigation will lead directly to George Herbert Walker 
Bush and BCCI.  Why are certain Republicans trying to hurt Dubya in the name 
of taming the Big Dog?  

An Investigation of the Marc Rich Pardon Is Imminent. Click. FREE FORUM 
Subject: The Secret Financial Network Behind "Wizard" George Soros - Part 2 
of 2 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (stefan lemieszewski) © 2001 Date of posting: 12 
Nov 1996 09:36:05 GMT * 
The following text has been sent to the following newsgroups on the Internet: 
soc.culture.ukrainian,soc.culture.russian,soc.culture.polish, 
soc.culture.magyar,soc.culture.croatia, soc.culture.slovenia, 
soc.culture.yugoslavia, soc.culture.swiss,alt.conspiracy,soc.culture.usa
Source URL: http://csf.colorado.edu/pen-l/mar99/0128.html

But, what has never been identified in a single major Western press 
investigation, was that the Rothschild-group was at the heart of the vast 
illegal web of BCCI. The key figure was Dr. Alfred Hartmann, the managing 
director of the BCCI Swiss subsidiary, Banque de Commerce et de Placement SA; 
at the same time, he ran the Zurich Rothschild Bank AG, and sat in London as 
a member of the board of N.M. Rothschild and Sons, Hartmann was also a 
business partner of Helmut Raiser, friend of de Picciotto, and linked to 
Nordex.

Hartmann was also chairman of the Swiss affiliate of the Italian BNL bank, 
which was implicated in the Bush administration illegal transfers to Iraq 
prior to the 1990 Iraqi invasion of Kuwait. The Atlanta branch of BNL, with 
the knowledge of George Bush when he was vice-president, conduited funds to 
Helmut Raiser's Zug, Switzerland company, Consen, for development of the 
CondorII missile program by Iraq, Egypt, and Argentina, during the Iran-Iraq 
War. Hartmann was vice-chairman of another secretive private Geneva bank, the 
Bank of NY-Inter-Maritime Bank, a bank whose chairman, Bruce Rappaport, was 
one of the illegal financial conduits for Col. Oliver North's Contra 
drugs-for-weapons network during the late 1980. North also used the BCCI as 
one of his preferred banks to hide his illegal funds.

Rich's, Reichmann's, and Soros's Israeli links

According to reports of former U.S. State Department intelligence officers 
familiar with the Soros-case, Soros's Quantum Fund amassed a war chest of 
well over $10 billion, with the help of a powerful group of "silent" 
investors who let Soros deploy the capital to demolish European monetary 
stability in September 1992.

Among Soros's silent investors, these sources say, are the fugitive metals 
and oil trader Marc Rich, based in Zug, Switzerland; and Shaul Eisenberg, a 
decades-long member of Israeli Mossad intelligence, who functions as a major 
arms merchant throughout Asia and the Near East. Eisenberg was recently 
banned from doing business in Uzbekistan, where he had been accused by the 
government of massive fraud and corruption. A third Soros partner is Israel's 
"Dirty Rafi" Eytan, who served in London previously as Mossad liaison to 
British intelligence.

Rich was one of the most active western traders in oil, aluminum, and other 
commodities in the Soviet Union and Russia between 1989 and 1993. This, not 
coincidentally, is just the period when Grigori Luchansky's Nordex Group 
became a multibillion-dollar company selling Russian oil, aluminum, and other 
commodities. 
Canadian real estate entrepreneur Paul Reichmann, formerly of Olympia and 
York notoriety, born in Hungary, Jew like Soros, is a business partner in 
Soros's Quantum Realty, a $525-million real estate investment fund.

The Reichmann tie links Soros as well with Henry Kissinger and former Tory 
Foreign Minister Lord Carrington (who is also a member of Kissinger 
Associates, Inc. of New York). Reichmann sits with both Kissinger and 
Carrington on the board of the influential British-Canadian publishing group, 
Hollinger, Inc. Hollinger owns a large number of newspapers in Canada and the 
United States, the London Daily Telegraph, and the largest English-language 
daily in Israel, the Jerusalem Post. Hollinger has been attacking President 
Clinton and the Middle East peace process ever since Clinton's election in 
November 1992.

Soros and geopolitics

Soros is little more than one of several significant vehicles for economic 
and financial warfare by the Club of the Isles faction. Because his 
affiliations to these interests have not previously been spotlighted, he 
serves extremely useful functions for the oligarchy, as in 1992 and 1993, 
when he launched his attack on the European Rate Mechanism.

Although Soros's speculation played a role in finally taking the British 
pound out of the ERM currency group entirely, it would be a mistake to view 

[CTRL] Skolnick-AMERICAN TROIKA Part One

2001-02-06 Thread William Shannon

AMERICAN TROIKA Part One
1/05/01 by Sherman H. Skolnick

WILLIAM ROCKEFELLER CLINTON===GEORGE W. BUSH===ALBERT GORE, Jr.

Who dares mention? Who cares to remember? Russian-style, America has
proceeded as a three-horse wagon. BUT, has the United States IN AMERICA [not
OF AMERICA] become stagnant because each horse has sought to pull in a
different direction?

Groomed as a handsome, glib stooge since a teenager, WILLIAM ROCKEFELLER
CLINTON or whatever his true name is or was, has been handled and promoted by
the Rockefeller interests that have for decades owned and operated Arkansas.
[Several terms before Governor alleged "Clinton", Winthrop Rockefeller was
Arkansas Governor. Alleged Clinton is an illegitimate great grandson of old
John D. Rockefeller, founder of the infamous Standard Oil Trust. Our
interviews with mid-level members of the Rockefeller family convinces us of
"Clinton's" lineage. Yet, all birth records and related early papers of him
have apparently been destroyed if they ever existed.] In Arkansas, you cannot
even be a dog-catcher, without the blessings of the world's oil-soaked
bankers, swindlers, and assassins.

Early in his career, through the London station chief of the American CIA,
alleged Clinton became an agent provocateur for Western interests, to
continue the control and image of the Soviets as "enemies" of the U.S., to
enrich U.S. war contractors endlessly. With covert American espionage
funding, jointly with the aid of a clever so-called "Marxist", Strobe
Talbott, alleged Clinton took up expensive residency in Moscow. Pretending to
be young peaceniks, and alleged Clinton pretendedly a "draft dodger" (while
serving actually the American CIA), whose fudged chronology fooled many,
together they somehow extracted the secret transcript showing Krushchev
lambasting the Stalinists. So doing, Talbott and the alleged Clinton passed
the CIA test.


Through London, the alleged Clinton from an early age, was, in simplest
terms, a British agent. [Who remembers that the British set up the American
CIA? See the book "Intrepid" by Stephens.] As a purported Cecil Rhodes
scholar, alleged Clinton was sent to Oxford. [According to published British
accounts, he could not finish his British education, having been charged with
raping a British woman. He was allowed to escape criminal prosecution on
agreeing to leave the United Kingdom.] Based on a 19th Century South African
gold/diamond fortune, the Rhodes Trust is pledged to overthrow the American
central government and restore the inhabitants of this continent as subjects
of the British monarchy with America resuming as British puppet colonies.
Chosen by the world government elite in 1991, the Bilderberg Society Group,
and sworn to support the Rhodes Trust, the alleged Clinton ran against his
little-known mentor, George Herbert Walker Bush. And Bush's role as oil
billionaire was arranged by the British Royal family. [See "Unauthorized
Biography of George Bush" by Webster Tarpley and Anton Chaikin.] Bush and his
worldwide espionage vehicle, Zapata Offshore, since at least 1959, was part
of a CIA front operation.

By studying the alleged Clinton and his purported "wife", herself, separately
a CIA darling from a young age, it becomes obvious their role, on behalf of
the Brits, was with impunity, to shamefully discredit the American central
government, and the U.S. Constitution on which it is built and dependent.
Scandal upon scandal was used by the liars and whores of the Press to
entertain a dumbed down America. This culminated in a sex scandal that
younger Americans in particular, and old lechers in general, found highly
amusing.

Little known or understood, GEORGE W. BUSH, called by some Bush the Younger,
over the years had the alleged Clinton as a trusted confidant. The Arkansas
traveler, from time to time, came to the Bush Family mansion at
Kennebunkport, Maine. There purports to be an undercover Drug Enforcement
Administration, DEA, photo, showing the alleged Clinton in recent years
snorting cocaine jointly with Bush the Younger. That photo, apparently
available to, or purchased by, the Gore year 2000 Presidential Election
Campaign, if used, might have severely detracted from the younger Bush's
candidacy.

During the Florida election debacle, British broadcasters and print
correspondents, on-site in Tallahassee, delighted in lampooning the American
government in general and Bush/Gore in specific. The Brits had an interest,
like the alleged Clintons, to completely discredit the American government
the Florida state judicary, and ultimately, the U.S. Supreme Court dominated
by a fascist-like "Gang of Five". [Visit our website for earlier stories on
the year 2000 election trauma.] Chief Justice William Rehnquist easily could
play the role of a bygone day of a Nazi-era judge, with imperial gold stripes
on his black dress. In perjured testimony before the U.S. Senate, as a Chief
Justice appointee, Rehnquist denied that some years previous in his 

[CTRL] PanAm 103 Verdict: Justice or Politics?

2001-02-06 Thread William Shannon

http://www.consortiumnews.com/020601b.html

February 5,  2001   
PanAm 103 Verdict: Justice or Politics? 

By William Blum

The newspapers were filled with pictures of happy relatives of the victims of 
the 1988 bombing of PanAm 103.
A Libyan, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al Megrahi, was found guilty of the bombing 
by a Scottish court in the Hague, his co-defendant, Al Amin Khalifa Fhimah, 
being acquitted. At long last there was going to be some kind of closure for 
the families.
So what's wrong with this picture?
What's wrong is that the evidence against Megrahi was stretched thin to the 
point of transparency. Indeed, the court verdict might be dubbed Supreme 
Court II, another instance of non-judicial factors clouding judicial 
reasoning.
The three Scottish judges cannot have relished returning to the United 
Kingdom after finding both defendants innocent of the murder of 270 people, 
largely from the U.K. and the United States. Not to mention having to face 
dozens of hysterical victims' family members in the courtroom.
As with any horrendous crime, there's a desire for someone to be punished. 
That's an especially strong sentiment when a defendant is from an unpopular 
racial or ethnic group, in this case, a Libyan. The three judges also knew 
the desires of the White House and Downing Street as to the outcome.
One has to read the entire 26,000-word Opinion of the Court which accompanied 
the verdict, as well as being very familiar with the history of the case 
going back to 1988, to appreciate what the judges did.
The Case
The key charge against Megrahi -- the sine qua non -- is that he caused a 
suitcase with explosives to be loaded at Malta airport and tagged it so it 
would pass through Malta, Frankfurt and London airports without an 
accompanying passenger and without being detected.
That by itself would have been a major feat and so unlikely to happen that 
any terrorist with any common sense would have found a better way. But aside 
from anything else, we have this -- as to the first step, loading the 
suitcase at Malta: there is no witness, no video, no document, no 
fingerprints, no forensic evidence of any kind linking Megrahi -- or anyone 
else -- to such an act.
And the court admits it: "The absence of any explanation of the method by 
which the primary suitcase might have been placed on board KM180 [Air Malta] 
is a major difficulty for the Crown case."
The case for the suitcase's hypothetical travels must also deal with the fact 
that, according to Air Malta, all the documented luggage on KM180 was 
collected by passengers in Frankfurt and did not continue in transit to 
London, and that two PanAm on-duty officials in Frankfurt testified that no 
unaccompanied luggage was introduced onto PanAm 103A, the feeder flight to 
London.
Moreover, under security requirements in 1988, unaccompanied baggage was 
subjected to special x-ray examinations, plus -- because of a recent event -- 
the security personnel were on the lookout specifically for a bomb secreted 
in a radio, as was the case with the PanAm 103 bomb.
To counter this evidence, the judges cite some sketchy and confusing 
notations about the movement of luggage wagons within the Frankfurt airport. 
The prosecution introduced these records to suggest that some unidentified 
luggage still might have gone from KM180 to a baggage clearinghouse at the 
airport and theoretically could have gone from there to PanAm 103A.
But the prosecution never called the official who made the key notations and 
was responsible for processing the baggage to explain what the sketchy 
records might mean. Nevertheless, the judges seized on these notations to 
conclude that "the documentary evidence as a whole therefore clearly gives 
rise to the inference that an item which came in on KM180 was transferred to 
and left on PA103A."
Heathrow Security
The prosecution's case encountered more complexities at Heathrow Airport 
outside London. Again there was no evidence that luggage originating from 
Malta was loaded onto PanAm 103.
The trial evidence also revealed that Heathrow had lax security around the 
"baggage build-up area" where luggage for PanAm 103 was stored prior to the 
flight.
"The build-up area was adjacent to a roadway extensively used by persons 
within the airport," the judges said. "In December 1988, it was busier than 
usual because construction work was in progress at the airport."
The bin for the luggage was marked PanAm 103, according to testimony, so it 
was not a mystery where suitcases in the bin were headed. "There was no 
security guard outside the shed, so that the placing of items on the conveyor 
belt was unsupervised," stated the court opinion.
After loading suitcases into the bin, one of the baggage handlers testified 
that he left the area to have a cup of tea. "On his return, he saw that two 
cases had been added to the container," including one "brown or maroony-brown 
hardshell Samsonite-type case," which matched the description of 

[CTRL] Mad Cow Disease: The Chemical Industry Plays Dirty

2001-02-06 Thread William Shannon
http://www.freezerbox.com/archive/2001/01/bse/

Mad Cow Disease: The Chemical Industry Plays Dirty
BY DR. PAUL KAIL
ACTIVISM | 01.17.01


BSE (Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy), or Mad Cow Disease, and its human
form, nvCJD (New Variant Creutzfeldt-Jacob Disease), are incurable brain
disorders. Holes appear in victims' brains, then they become demented and
die. The diseases are not caused by a virus or a bacterium, but by a
mysterious type of twisted protein, known as a "prion". The prion can
propagate itself by causing other proteins to twist into the same shape.
Prions can be passed on by eating the flesh of another animal, and are
resistant to cooking and digestion. A theory about how prions are formed
suggests that organophosphate pesticides could be partly to blame. Two people
have already died defending this theory, apparently at the hands of
professional assassins working either for the British government or the
chemical industry. So the theory needs to be taken seriously. BSE first
appeared in the UK in 1985. Since then, the disease has affected half of the
cow herds in the country. New Variant CJD also first appeared in the UK, ten
years later: to date, around 90 people have died from it. Both BSE and CDJ
are beginning to spread throughout the rest of Europe; today, 30 European
countries have had exports of their cattle banned. The diseases have the
potential to destroy the entire European cattle industry, and kill thousands
of people. The death toll from nvCJD is increasing by 35% per year, and the
disease has a gestation period of twenty years. Some projections suggest that
hundreds of thousands of people could eventually die from it. Given the huge
amount at stake, one might expect that any credible theory would be welcomed.
Yet Mark Purdey, a British farmer from Somerset, has suffered constant
harassment and has had to support his research from his own pocket. Purdey
has a theory which might explain the mystery of why BSE and new variant nvCJD
started in the UK, and why they are so much more serious there. However,
since he went public with his ideas, some rather unfortunate things have
happened:
Both his vet and the lawyer defending his case died in suspicious road
accidents. His second lawyer also had a car crash, but survived.

When an article about his work appeared in the "Independent", a national
British newspaper, his telephone lines were cut. He was therefore unable to
take follow up calls from other papers and television stations.

His farm house was burnt down just before he was about to move in.

His science library was destroyed by a collapsing barn.

When he travels around the country to talk about his theory, he is constantly
trailed. Purdey believes that the root cause of BSE is an imbalance of
magnesium and copper, exacerbated, in the case of the UK, by the use of a
highly toxic pesticide known as phosmet. Phosphet is an organophosphate nerve
toxin, originally developed by the Nazis. It is also related to the drug
Thalidamide, which causes birth defects. Phosmet is made by Zeneca, a
subdivision of the British chemical giant ICI. A week after the British
government first announced the link between BSE and nvCJD, Zeneca sold the
patent for phosmet to a PO Box company in Arizona, apparently to avoid
potential legal action. The theory started when Purdey noticed that his cows,
unlike those of his neighbours, were not getting BSE. Cows often suffer from
a parasitic infection known as warble fly. Since Purdey is an organic farmer,
he treated his herd with derris root powder, a natural remedy. Other farmers
were using phosmet, which was later made compulsory throughout the UK. When
Purdey bought an infected cow from another herd, he was able to reduce the
symptoms of BSE by injecting oxime, which is an antidote to pesticide
poisoning. However, officials from MAFF (the Ministry for Agriculture,
Fisheries and Food) turned up to kill the cow before the experiment could be
completed. As well as the link to phosmet use, Purdey discovered that brain
diseases such as BSE and nvCJD appear in clusters in many places around the
world. The link seems to be a lack of copper and an excess of manganese. For
example, in some areas of Colorado and Wyoming, 4-6% of deer and elk suffer
from CWD (Chronic Wasting Disease), which is related to nvCJD. These animals
live in areas where the soils are very high in manganese. In Slovakia, where
the incidence of nvCJD is a thousand times higher than normal, most of the
victims live near a glass making plant (where manganese is used) or else
down-wind of one of two large ferro-manganese factories. In the UK, two
factors have increased the amount of manganese which cows consume. Until
1988, cows were fed chicken manure. The chicken had been fed manganese to
strengthen their eggs, but 98% of it ended up in the manure. In addition, a
fungicide rich in manganese was used on crops at that time. According to
Purdey, a lack of copper and an excess of manganese causes 

[CTRL] Ted Olson? You've got to be kidding

2001-02-06 Thread William Shannon
http://www.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/02/06/olson


Ted Olson? You've got to be kidding
How does President Bush expect to "raise the tone" in Washington by
nominating a right-wing celebrity and Kenneth Starr pal as solicitor general?
- - - - - - - - - - - -
By Joe Conason
Feb. 6, 2001 | Controversy rarely accompanies the appointment of a new
solicitor general, the powerful Justice Department official who represents
the United States government before the Supreme Court. But an angry
confirmation debate could ensue this month if President Bush names the man
whose name was leaked by the White House last week: Theodore B. Olson.
On paper, Olson's qualifications to serve as solicitor general are beyond
reproach. He is widely acknowledged to be one of the nation's most
experienced and capable appellate litigators, and he possesses more than a
dozen of the white quill pens that are given to lawyers when they argue
before the high court.
His most recent appearance there occurred in December, when he represented
the Bush-Cheney campaign in the Florida election case that divided the court
and the nation so bitterly. Aside from the five Supreme Court justices who
voted in his favor, there may be no one to whom Bush owes his victory more
than Olson.
There is another, darker side to the 59-year-old Republican attorney,
however, which may trouble the Democratic senators who would have to decide
whether Olson should be confirmed. Over the past several years, this partisan
legal warrior has sought the ruin of the Clinton administration and the
personal destruction of the former first family by any means necessary.
He was a central figure in the shadowy "Arkansas Project," which funneled
more than $2 million through the tax-exempt American Spectator magazine to
private investigators digging up anti-Clinton dirt. He wrote anonymous
articles for the Spectator that suggested that various Clinton administration
officials were guilty of felonies, and compared the White House to a Mafia
crime family. And he secretly coached the lawyers for Paula Jones before
their own appearance at the Supreme Court.
Indeed, considering Olson's furious obsession with the Clintons and his
dubious conduct in pursuing them, his appointment would cast grave doubt on
the new president's vow to "raise the tone" of public life in the capital.
Olson's career as a conservative lawyer is full of ironies. His long
association with the Republican right dates back to the 1970s, when he worked
in the Los Angeles offices of Gibson, Dunn  Crutcher with William French
Smith, later the first attorney general in the Reagan administration, and 
Kenneth Starr, who joined the Reagan Justice Department along with Olson and
Smith.
Among Olson's clients then was Ronald Reagan, whom he continued to represent
as a private attorney during the Iran-Contra investigation. Through the Bush
and Clinton years, when Starr served as solicitor general himself and then as
the Whitewater Independent Counsel, Olson has remained one of Starr's closest
personal friends and political associates.
Before he returned to private practice in 1985, Olson had an ill-fated
sojourn as assistant attorney general. His actions and testimony during a
congressional investigation of corruption at the Environmental Protection
Agency led to the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate him.
No criminal charges were brought against him, but the independent counsel's
report strongly suggested that Olson had intentionally misled Congress even
though his testimony had been "literally true."
That four-year probe was financially and emotionally torturous for Olson, who
fought all the way to the Supreme Court in an attempt to overturn the
independent counsel statute on constitutional grounds. The court's historic
decision against him in Morrison vs. Olson set the stage for his friend
Starr's meandering six-year investigation of the Clintons and their
associates a few years later.
The acidulous partisanship that characterizes both Olson and his wife
Barbara, an attorney who expresses their viewpoint in frequent appearances as
a conservative television commentator, may derive from his ordeal in the EPA
case, which he blamed on congressional Democrats who demanded an
investigation of him.
Since returning to private practice at the Washington offices of Gibson,
Dunn, he has become not only a prominent appellate attorney but an eminence
grise in the capital's conservative circles.
Like his wife, he has served on the boards of various conservative
foundations and think tanks, including the Washington Legal Foundation and
the Independent Women's Forum, many of which are financed by Pittsburgh
billionaire Richard Mellon Scaife. The Olsons' home in McLean, Va., is
virtually a cocktail lounge for the likes of Starr, defeated Supreme Court
nominee Robert Bork and other right-wing celebrities.
But it is Olson's role in the anti-Clinton activities of the American
Spectator that could become a severe 

[CTRL] Scientology: ties to Bush team?

2001-02-06 Thread William Shannon
http://www.msnbc.com/news/525674.asp

Scientology: ties to Bush team?     
    
Feb. 5 —  Will the Bush administration be a friend to Scientology? Officials 
at the controversial religion — which many critics have called a cult — have 
been boasting about its ties to the current administration, and are saying 
that the president’s support of faith-based social programs could mean that 
the government will funnel tax money its way.   

ONE SUCH PROGRAM is Applied Scholastics, a Los Angeles-based operation that 
promotes the teaching methods of Scientology founder L. Ron Hubbard. Applied 
Scholastics has been successful with church and community tutoring programs, 
especially in some inner cities in California — but Scientology foes have 
charged that it’s a front for the church and a recruiting tool.
       A recent issue of Freedom, the official Scientology magazine, features 
a picture, taken back at the President’s Summit for America’s Future, with 
Barbara and George H. Bush embracing both a high-ranking executive of the 
Church of Scientology and John Travolta, the actor who is a member and vocal 
advocate of Scientology. Colin and Alma Powell are also in the photo, which 
was taken when the church officials went to the summit in Philadelphia, 
during the Clinton years, to promote Applied Scholastics.
        “The [Bush administration] initiative may break down the academic 
church/state formula and instead look at who can provide the help that’s 
really needed,” says a church spokesman. “I’m optimistic about the whole 
thing.” 
        “The Bushes have long been associated with faith-based programs that 
address the needs of our society,” says cult and alternative religion expert 
Rick Ross, whose Web site, www.rickross.com, outlines the Bushes’ connections 
to the Rev. Moon and his various programs. “Some of these groups are very 
controversial and may have alternative agendas. So when we talk about funding 
faith-based programs, we should proceed very cautiously.”
        A Bush spokesman had no comment by press time.  



[CTRL] Hitchens On Elie Wiesel

2001-02-06 Thread William Shannon
http://www.thenation.com/docPrint.mhtml?i=20010219s=hitchens



CHRISTOPHER HITCHENS


Wiesel Words:

Minority Report


Is there a more contemptible poseur and windbag than Elie Wiesel? I suppose
there may be. But not, surely, a poseur and windbag who receives (and takes
as his due) such grotesque deference on moral questions. Look, if you will,
at his essay on Jerusalem in the New York Times of January 24.

As a Jew living in the United States, I have long denied myself the right to
intervene in Israel's internal debates My critics have their conception
of social and individual ethics; I have mine. But while I grant them their
right to criticize, they sometimes deny mine to abstain.



Such magnificent condescension, to grant his critics the right. And it is not
certain from when Wiesel dates his high-minded abstention from Israel's
internal affairs; he was a member of Menachem Begin's Irgun in the 1940s,
when that force employed extreme violence against Arab civilians and was more
than ready to use it against Jews. At all events, his dubious claim above is
only a pompous preface to discarding nonintervention in the present because
Jerusalem is at stake, and "the fact that I do not live in Jerusalem is
secondary; Jerusalem lives within me." (Again the modesty.) There are, sad to
say, serpents in Wiesel's internal Eden, and they too must be patronized:

That Muslims might wish to maintain close ties with this city unlike any
other is understandable. Although its name does not appear in the Koran,
Jerusalem is the third holiest city in Islam. But for Jews, it remains the
first. Not just the first; the only.



"Might wish." "Ties." "Understandable." "Third holiest." Even these lordly
and dismissive gestures clearly cost Wiesel something. After all, he
announces that the city is "mentioned more than 600 times in the Bible,"
which (assuming for a moment that one ought to think like a religious
fundamentalist in the first place) would give a Christian Arab--these being
at least 15 percent of the Palestinian population--quite a strong claim on
the old place. (Incidentally, let me ask any reader how often the city is
mentioned in the Torah.) But for Wiesel all Arabs are Muslims, and even if
they happen to live in Jerusalem, this is nothing to the way that Jerusalem
dwells within Wiesel. Indeed, it would evidently dwell more comfortably
within him if they did not live in it at all. Do I exaggerate? I don't think
so. In a propaganda tour of recent history, he asserts that in 1948, "incited
by their leaders, 600,000 Palestinians left the country convinced that, once
Israel was vanquished, they would be able to return home."
This claim is a cheap lie and is known by Wiesel to be a lie. It is
furthermore an utterly discredited lie, and one that Israeli officialdom no
longer cares to repeat. Israeli and Jewish historians have exposed it time
and again: Every Arab broadcasting station in the region, in 1947 as well as
1948, was monitored and recorded and transcribed by the BBC, and every Arab
newspaper has been scoured, and not one instance of such "incitement," in
direct speech or reported speech, has ever come to light. The late historian
and diplomat Erskine Childers issued an open challenge on the point as far
back as the 1950s that was never taken up and never will be. And of course
the lie is a Big Lie, because Expulsion-Denial lies at the root of the entire
problem and helps poison the situation to this day. (When Israel's
negotiators gingerly discuss the right of return, at least they don't claim
to be arguing about ghosts, or Dead Souls.)
In a brilliant reply to Wiesel published in Vesti, Israel's largest
Russian-language paper, Israel Shamir compares him rather leniently not to
Jabotinsky but to the Knight of the Doleful Countenance and his mad quest for
purity:

Be reasonable, old man. Stay within the frame of the story and within the
bounds of common decency. Don Quixote did not drive his jeep into Toboso to
rape his old flame. OK, you loved her, and thought about her, but it does
not give you the right to kill her children, bulldoze her rose garden and
put your boots on her dining-room table.



Shamir speaks of the beautiful city that Palestinians centuries ago "adorned
with a magnificent piece of jewelry, the Golden Dome of Haram al-Sharif,
built their houses with pointed arches and wide porches, and planted
cypresses and palm trees." He's wasting his time on Wiesel, who says that
Palestine was a desert before he arrived there as one of Begin's thugs, and
who slanders the people he helped dispossess, first by falsely saying that
they ran away from their beloved ancestral hometown and second by disputing
their right even to feel nostalgia for it.
In 1982, after Gen. Ariel Sharon had treated the inhabitants of the Sabra and
Shatila camps as target practice for his paid proxies, Wiesel favored us with
another of his exercises in neutrality. Asked by the New York Times to
comment on the pogrom, he was 

[CTRL] OS: Too Many Facts Get Florida Judge In Trouble

2001-02-06 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

The Orlando Sentinel



ORLANDO, Fla. - An Orlando judge who to likes to educate himself
about the issues he rules on is in trouble for asking too many
questions outside his courtroom.

A Florida state panel that monitors the conduct of judges says
Circuit Judge Joe Baker of Orange County has committed ethi­cal
violations. The rules are clear: Judges are supposed to make
decisions based solely information that lawyers provide during
the case

Baker calls that nonsense. He says lawyers working for clients
are the last peo­ple to give him objective information. So when
technical or scientific issues confuse him, he reads books and
questions knowl­edgeable friends and relatives or experts around
the country.

 Now he faces punishment ranging from a reprimand to removal from
office if the panel - and eventually the Florida Supreme Court
finds him guilty.

 "The lawyers are not interested in the judge having a full and
complete and accu­rate understanding of the subject," Baker said.
"They're interested in the judge seeing it their way."

He said the court system should be interested in having judges
make the most appropriate decision in a case. "Do you say a judge
is bound and limited to what he or she sees in the courtroom?"
"That's nonsense because it means the dumbest judge is the best.
It exalts ignorance. It exalts subordination. It's saying judges
should act dumb and stay dumb.

 But the Judicial Qualifications Commission maintains that Baker
isn't giving lawyers a fair shake in his courtroom. It contends
that lawyers trying a case have no idea what the judge learns
from his outside conversations and should have an opportunity to
rebut it.

Not only that, Baker could receive inaccurate information and the
lawyers won't know it, the commission says. At least if a judge
reads a book and tells the lawyers about it, the attorneys have a
chance to see what the judge has learned.

 JQC lawyer Charles Pillans, who is prosecuting Baker, would not
comment on the case. But in legal papers, he says that contrary
to Baker's arguments, rules of judicial conduct and legal
precedent prohibit a judge from consulting with others. If judges
are confused, they are supposed to ask lawyers to clear things
up. To do that, lawyers can bring in expert witnesses on any
subject.

"His consultation with (outside) experts in this case clearly
gives the appearance of impropriety, which, in light of Judge
Baker's inability to appreciate the import of his conduct, must
be addressed, " Pillans wrote.

JQC officials maintain that the rules aren't meant to keep judges
stupid. They can read what they want, draw on personal knowledge
of a lifetime or even pursue degrees in such areas as medicine or
engineering. According to the commission, general education is
different from researching a specific issue in a case.

 Baker says he thinks the intent of the rules is to stop judges
from discussing cases only with people involved in the case or
with people who want to influence the judge's decision.

Baker, 64, is one of Orlando's longest serving judges. Appointed
to the bench in 1977, he has never faced opposition in an
election. He is generally regarded as an intellect, an
independent thinker and a bit eccentric. He is prone to quoting
Socrates and other philosophers.

A voracious reader and writer, Baker often questions some of the
basic tenets of the court system. And his written rulings
sometimes incorporate his thoughts about issues rather than
sticking to the basic legal foundations.

"I know how diligent he is and how hard he tries to do a good
job," said Orlando lawyer Mayanne Downs, who is representing
Baker. "Is the state of our judiciary such that this is what the
JQC is pursuing? Is this a matter to sanction a public servant?"

Downs said she thinks Baker could become the first judge in
American history to be punished for educating himself.

The case that got Baker in trouble involved computers. Universal
Business Systems Inc. sued Disney Vacation Club Management Corp.,
over computer software it sold Disney for it's time-share
business. Disney was supposed to return the software plus all the
modifications made to it. That didn't happen.

After a trial in 1999, a jury decided Disney should pay $2
million dollars in damages. But Baker later overturned its
decision. He disagreed about how damages had been calculated.
Instead he reduced the judgment to just $1000.

An appeals court overturned Baker for several reasons, including
that he talked about the case outside of the courtroom. In a
memorandum, Baker wrote that he had spoken to several people
about technical computer issues.

He told the Orlando Sentinel that he talked to a friend who is a
computer consultant and Baker's son-in-law. An engineer who is an
expert on the computer systems of the U.S. Navy labs worldwide.

Sometime in the next few months, Baker will face a trial before
the JQC, a panel of judges, lawyers and laymen who will decide
whether he is 

[CTRL] UPI: Ex-Klan leader Duke may settle in Russia

2001-02-06 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

[An interesting question for the many American blacks and Jews
who voted against Bush would be why they think David Duke decided
to leave town right after the Republicans arrived.]


Ex-Klan leader Duke may settle in Russia

Tuesday, 6 February 2001 12:37 (ET)


 MOSCOW, Feb. 6 (UPI) -- David Duke, a former leader of the Ku
Klux Klan hopes to settle in Russia, the Interfax news agency
reports.

 Duke, who has made friends in Moscow among the extreme
nationalists led by Albert Makashov, has caused outrage among
Russia's human rights activists by openly marketing his book
"Ultimate Supremacism: An Examination of the Jewish Question."

 Interfax said Duke wants to continue the "struggle against
people of other colors and Jews" from a base in Russia, but he
may have trouble receiving a residency permit from the Russian
authorities.

 Duke was a Republican Louisiana state representative in the
1980s. He also ran for governor, but lost.


=
 Kadosh, Kadosh, Kadosh, YHVH, TZEVAOT

  FROM THE DESK OF:
 *Michael Spitzer*  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  ~~~
  The Best Way To Destroy Enemies Is To Change Them To Friends
=

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Media Begin Review of Fla. Ballots

2001-02-06 Thread DIG alfred webre

-Caveat Lector-

Query: Is this the basic USA political story of the next 4 years?
Alfred Webre, Vancouver, BC
=
 Monday February 5 5:57 PM ET
   Media Begin Review of Fla. Ballots

   By RACHEL LA CORTE, Associated Press Writer

   MIAMI (AP) - A research firm hired by several of the nation's
 largest news organizations began
   surveying thousands of presidential ballots Monday in an effort to
 create an independent record of
   the disputed Florida election.

   The National Opinion Research Center, a nonprofit firm affiliated
 with the University of Chicago,
   plans to build a database that will describe in detail the
 estimated 180,000 ballots that did not
   register a vote for president during machine counts.

   News organizations overseeing the review include The Associated
 Press, CNN, The New York
   Times, The Palm Beach Post, St. Petersburg Times, Tribune
 Publishing, The Wall Street Journal
   and The Washington Post.

   The project begins almost two months after the U.S. Supreme Court
 (news - web sites) stopped
   the ongoing recounts in Florida.

   George W. Bush (news - web sites) captured a razor-thin victory
 over Vice President Al Gore
   (news - web sites), carrying Florida by 537 votes out of 6 million
 cast, giving him the state's 25
   electoral votes and thus the national election.

   ``This project was undertaken to provide an independent record of
 rejected ballots in the race that
   ultimately determined the 2000 presidential election,'' said Kevin
 Walsh, AP's chief of bureau for
   Florida. ``Our goal is to inspect and classify these ballots, and
 certainly not to challenge the
   certification of results.''

   The review started Monday in five of Florida's 67 counties -
 Miami-Dade, Hillsborough, Pinellas,
   Polk and Pasco. The statewide review is expected to take at least
 eight weeks to complete.

   The research firm trained teams of workers to use the same
 standard in reviewing rejected
   ballots, including overvotes where voters indicated a preference
 for more than one candidate and
   undervotes where machines recorded no vote.

   For instance, in the 24 counties that use punchcard ballots,
 workers will simply describe
   distinguishing marks. That includes whether chads - the tiny
 perforated squares that voters punch
   out with a stylus to record their vote - are missing, hanging by
 one or more corners, or ``dimpled.''

   Each worker is to make a determination and is not supposed to
 discuss the evaluation with other
   team members.

   The news organizations plan to use the database to produce their
 own stories. The data also will
   be released to the general public for additional research.

   Other Florida newspapers represented through their parent
 companies are The Orlando Sentinel,
   South Florida Sun-Sentinel based in Fort Lauderdale, Sarasota
 Herald-Tribune, Ocala
   Star-Banner, The (Lakeland) Ledger and The Gainesville Sun.

   Other news organizations have been invited to join the effort and
 share the costs, which are
   expected to exceed $500,000.

   In an unrelated ballot review, The Miami Herald is working with an
 accounting firm to review the
   estimated 60,000 undervote ballots that were rejected in the
 presidential race statewide. The
   Herald hopes to be completed by mid-March, said Mark Seibel, the
 Herald's assistant managing
   editor.

   The conservative legal group Judicial Watch is also conducting its
 own statewide review, which is
   expected to take months.

_
EcoNews Service - Always online for Ecology, Consciousness  Universe
Exopolitics.
EcoNews http://www.ecologynews.com/
Prague  http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Vancouver, BC V6M 1V8

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to 

[CTRL] Bush Statement on Groom Lake

2001-02-06 Thread DIG alfred webre

-Caveat Lector-

  SECRECY NEWS
 from the FAS Project on Government Secrecy
 February 6, 2001

 BUSH STATEMENT ON GROOM LAKE

 President George W. Bush's first published comment on national security
 classification policy comes in a January 31 letter to Congress that
 restates the exemption of the classified facility at Groom Lake, Nevada
 from certain environmental disclosure requirements:

 "Information concerning activities at the operating location near Groom
 Lake has been properly determined to be classified and its disclosure would
 be harmful to national security. Continued protection of this information
 is, therefore, in the paramount interest of the United States," President
 Bush wrote.  See:

http://www.fas.org/sgp/news/2001/02/wh020101.html

 ___
 Steven Aftergood
 Project on Government Secrecy
 Federation of American Scientists
 http://www.fas.org/sgp/index.html
 Email:  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 _
EcoNews Service - Always online for Ecology, Consciousness  Universe
Exopolitics.
EcoNews http://www.ecologynews.com/
Prague  http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Vancouver, BC V6M 1V8

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Internet: disinformation stories (Web Sites Act As Host for Extremist)

2001-02-06 Thread DIG alfred webre

-Caveat Lector-

Hi All - A new wave of "ani-Internet" disinformation stories are starting to
appear in the "news".  The version below is put out by NATO/USA intelligence
agencies.  Query: Is their function to set up a "terrorist" crackdown on
Internet freedome of expression/information?

Alfred Webre
EcoNews Service, Vancouver, BC
http://www.ecologynews.com
=
 Tuesday February 6 3:09 PM ET
   Web Sites Act As Host for Extremist
   Plots

 By Sue Pleming

 WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Extremist
 groups, including Saudi dissident Osama
 bin Laden (news - web sites)'s network,
 are using popular web sites to post
 encrypted messages to their agents
 plotting guerrilla activities, security
 sources
 said on Tuesday.

   The Internet has become the medium of choice among many
   guerrilla groups to pass on hidden messages, replacing the
   classified columns in newspapers that Cold War-era spies used to
   deliver their secrets.

   ``This is warfare on the cheap and very easy to activate,'' said
   Yonah Alexander, head of the International Center for Terrorism
   Studies at the Potomac Institute for Policy Studies.

   Internet bulletin boards carrying pornographic and sports
   information -- which get huge numbers of ``hits'' -- are among the

   most popular hosts for extremist groups such as bin Laden's, said
   cyber-intelligence expert Ben Venzke.

   Bin Laden, a dissident Saudi businessman, has been indicted for
   the 1998 bombing of two U.S. embassies in East Africa and has
   been named as a possible suspect behind last fall's bombing of the

   USS Cole destroyer in Yemen. Four alleged bin Laden associates
   went on trial Monday in federal court in New York for the embassy
   bombings.

   USA Today newspaper reported on Tuesday that bin Laden began
   using encryption five years ago, but recently increased its use
 after
   U.S. officials revealed they were tapping his satellite telephone
 calls
   from Afghanistan, where he lives.

   Busy Bulletin Boards Are Popular Target

   Venzke said just as the recipient reading a coded classified ad
   would know what to look for, a secret message could be
   embedded, or encrypted, in an image seen by millions on an
   Internet bulletin board.

   He cited the example of a pornographic picture labeled 'blond
   bombshell' posted on an Internet bulletin board which would
   probably be downloaded by thousands of users who were unaware
   of a coded message ``hidden'' in the existing image.

   ``The cell (guerrilla), though, will download that image, know
 what
   program to run to extract it, what encryption software to use to
   decrypt it and then will have that information,'' said Venzke,
 director
   of intelligence, special projects, at iDefense cyber-intelligence
   company in Virginia.

   Venzke declined to name sites where material is being hidden but
   said any bulletin board or public forum that generated lots of
 traffic
   was a target.

   ``Because it's done on a heavily-used public bulletin board, it's
   extremely challenging and difficult to track,'' he added.

   Security experts said some messages are scrambled using free
   encryption programs set up by groups that advocate privacy on the
   Internet, which are then decrypted using a code known only by the
   recipient and sender.

   Cia Worried About Use Of Internet

   One U.S. security official said the authorities were extremely
   worried about the use of the Internet by extremist groups and that

   this was an area being watched very closely.

   In testimony to Congress last year, the CIA (news - web sites)'s
   information operations issue manager, John Serabian, said Middle
   East groups such as Hizbollah, Hamas and bin Laden's, were using
   computerized files, email, and encryption to support their
   organizations.

   ``We also recognize that cyber tools offer them new, low-cost,
 easily
   hidden means to inflict damage. Terrorists and extremists already
   use the Internet to communicate, to raise funds, recruit, and
 gather
   intelligence,'' he said.

   CIA director George Tenet also addressed the issue in a closed
   hearing last year when he referred to millions of potential
   ``information warriors.''

   Extremist groups now routinely send their operatives for training
 on
   how to manipulate the Internet for plotting attacks, security
 sources
   said.

   ``Some groups are sending their people to study computer
   engineering. What is of grave concern here is the 

Re: [CTRL] Gifts Were Not Meant for Clintons

2001-02-06 Thread Marilyn Wright

-Caveat Lector-

On 6 Feb 01, at 5:38, Prudence L. Kuhn wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 In a message dated 02/05/2001 10:48:15 PM Eastern Standard Time,
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  I think it's considered an honor to have an item accepted to be
 part of the White House collection...it's
  considered a gift to the country as a whole, not to any one person
  who
 happens to be president at the time.. 

 That's really interesting.  Who decides if the item is acceptable?
 Wouldn't it be fun to have an item permanently in the White House?  I
 hope they have a better system of getting rid of items than they have
 for old aircraft parts. I know that Jackie got new china.  What
 happened to the old china?  I think Nancy replaced Jackie's.  What
 happened to that?  I don't believe the dresses were the things that
 Nancy took with her.  The scandal about the designer dresses happened
 fairly early in Reagan's first term.  They would have been fairly old
 hat by the time the Reagans left to go to the ranch (presented to them
 by an admirer).  Thank God no one gave Clinton a ranch.  It would be
 the sole subject of the news for the next ten years.  Prudy

Then there's always the possibility someone gave him Alzheimer's
as  a parting giftso convenient--and now poignant-- that he can't
remember.

I'm intrigued by all this touting of Reagan as such an important
president, poised in contrast to the departing  "white trash" Clinton.
The effort is to compare Reagan favorably to Bush, Jr. when the
one thing Reagan and Bush Jr. have in common is that they
were/are  both probably puppets of Bush, Sr.
sno0wl

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Teen jailed for threatening Bush

2001-02-06 Thread DIG alfred webre

-Caveat Lector-

Teen jailed for threatening Bush

- - - - - - - - - - - -

Feb. 6, 2001 | WISCONSIN RAPIDS, Wis. (AP) -- An 18-year-old who violated his
probation by threatening to kill President
Bush has been sentenced to what amounts to an additional month in jail.

Andrew N. Niese, who had been on probation for a fake school bomb threat,
told teachers at his Wisconsin Rapids charter
school several times in December that if George W. Bush became president he
would be assassinated, a police report said.

Niese, of Port Edwards, told a teacher later that month that he would buy a
rifle and shoot Bush, the report said.

Niese had previously been convicted of possession of a dangerous weapon other
than a firearm on school grounds and
obstructing an officer, both misdemeanors, for placing a fake bomb at his
high school in Port Edwards last April 20.

"Twice you've been involved with something drawing attention nationally. I
don't want to be the judge who lets you out of jail
when something like this escalates," Wood County Circuit Court Judge Edward
Zappen Jr. told Niese at Monday's sentencing.

Zappen sentenced Niese to seven months in jail. With time already served and
"good time" he had earned, that means will have
to spend about a month in jail, defense lawyers said.

- - - - - - - - - - - -
__
EcoNews Service - Always online for Ecology, Consciousness  Universe
Exopolitics.
EcoNews http://www.ecologynews.com/
Prague  http://mujweb.cz/www/ecologynews/
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/Vancouver, BC V6M 1V8

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Bush's Compassionate Fascism

2001-02-06 Thread radman

-Caveat Lector-

ARMIES OF COMPASSION: G. W. BUSH'S COMPASSIONATE FASCISM

by Robert Lederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]

"As President, I will lead the federal government to take bold
steps to rally America's armies of compassion." GW Bush
January 30, 2001 from his introduction to the agenda for his
faith-based initiative, "Rally the Armies of Compassion."

On the surface it sounds like a good idea. Let faith-based
religious organizations compete with government programs for
funds to service the homeless, the hungry, drug addicts,
welfare recipients, children and prisoners.

The notion of a Federally-funded "army" making war on social
evils is not new. We've had the war against drugs and the war
against poverty, programs which have consumed trillions of
dollars in a failed attempt to eradicate poverty and drug use.
Their main success? The creation of a huge Federal
beauracracy.

Making religious groups compete with government agencies
for Federal funds also sounds good - until you really think
about it. Since many of these groups use non-salaried
volunteers or psychologically-coerced recruits as employees,
they will have no trouble delivering services less expensively
than a government program which provides relatively qualified
employees with a salary and health benefits.

As President of an artists' rights group which rejects funding
and government interference of any kind I've observed the
creativity and freedom of millions of American artists
compromised through a similar system of competition for
government money.

Art and religion have much in common. You can make art
without First Amendment freedom - Nazi Germany, the USSR
and Communist China had vast art programs involving millions
of exceptional artists. You can also have religion without
religious freedom. All history will remember about such
religious or artistic efforts is how spiritually dead they were.

Millions of contemporary American artists now divide their
time between applying for government grants and making art.
Their ideas are conditioned by the grant requirements.

Rather than helping America's artists, the NEA created a vast
beauracracy of art lawyers, program administrators, curators
and museum directors who serve as the gateway to government
money. These administrators are the high priests of the art
world. American museums, art galleries, television stations and
theatrical companies must modify and self-censor their works
every day thanks to this dependency on Federal funds.

It's ironic to see the conservatives who led the fight against the
NEA leading the fight to enslave religious institutions in this
same money trap. Art and religion are the conscience of
humankind, the voice which stands up to tyranny at great risk
when all others have been silenced and compromised.

America is a religious nation with thousands of sects and
denominations that are substantially free of government control
or regulation. Do we want our religious institutions to modify
their messages as American artists have been forced to do? Do
we want official religion the way we now have official art?

It's worth noting how official art came about in the US. Most
Americans have a dismissive attitude towards so-called modern
art imagining that its abstract imagery is due to artistic
preferences. In fact, it has far more to do with the CIA and
America's ruling elite - in particular the Rockefeller family. [1]

In the nineteen thirties and forties American artists were
heavily involved in protests against poverty, racism and
corporate control. They used figurative art, murals and realism
not only to express their feeling about these social problems
but to rally the public to do something about them.

Then the State Department, the CIA and the Rockefellers
stepped in and began promoting abstract art, beginning with
the Rockefellers' Museum of Modern Art in NYC. Ever
wonder why America's wealthiest families spend billions on
giant paintings and sculptures that represent nothing and why
the government erects huge museums to display these
non-wonders? In the fifties and sixties the government created
public school programs to brainwash American children about
art. Millions of these children then grew up to become artists
specializing in abstraction and non-figurative art.

The CIA and these same ruling families are also behind
President Bush's Army of Compassion which hopes to make
religious organizations as dependent on government funding as
arts institutions now are. Announced as a compassionate effort
to promote charitable activity, the real intent is exactly the
opposite - to control, compromise and co-opt it.

The men Bush has put in charge of his faith-based initiative,
John J. Dilulio Jr. and Stephen Goldsmith, are senior fellows of
the CIA's Manhattan Institute, a right wing think tank
co-funded by the Rockefellers' Chase Manhattan Bank,
pharmaceutical companies and right wing foundations with ties
to the military-industrial complex. Goldsmith is President

[CTRL] [radtimes] # 148

2001-02-06 Thread radman

-Caveat Lector-

[radtimes] # 148

An informally produced compendium of vital irregularities.

"We're living in rad times!"
---
How to assist RadTimes-- (See ** at end.)
---
Contents:

--Corporate Media Try to Bleep Out J20 Protests
--Davos, Switzerland: Angry Protests at Summit
--Cameras at Super Bowl scanned faces looking for criminals
--Secret Cameras Scanned Crowd at Super Bowl for Criminals
--What I Learned from the World Social Forum
--DOJ Offers Guidance on Electronic Evidence
--President Jackass: Stupid George loses more votes
--The Human Part of the Brain

===

Corporate Media Try to Bleep Out J20 Protests

Feb. 8, 2001
Workers World newspaper

BEFORE, DURING  AFTER J20: CORPORATE MEDIA TRY TO
BLEEP OUT PROTESTS

By Gery Armsby

Thousands of print, TV, radio and Internet media personnel
were on hand for the inauguration of President George W.
Bush on Jan. 20. How could this massive media presence have
failed to cover the huge anti-Bush protests all over
Washington and in many other U.S. cities?

Didn't they see the demonstrations? Was there confusion over
what the protests were about? Was it a collective but benign
error of omission?

Or was it a highly coordinated effort between the corporate-
dominated media and the government, including multiple
police agencies, to spare the new administration the
embarrassment of reporting the presence of tens of thousands
of angry, often militant protesters who far outnumbered
Bush's supporters along the parade route?

On Jan. 21, the front pages of every major newspaper
published in North America were filled with pictures and
words glorifying and legitimizing Bush's foul ascendancy to
the White House. Yet news of the mass protests was relegated
to the back pages or, presumably, the editors' wastebaskets.

Cable and broadcast TV networks like CNN, MSNBC, Fox and
ABC
carried live coverage of the inauguration. Each repeated the
same bare minimum of information about protests, dismissing
them as "not causing the security problems that were
expected" or "loud but well contained."

This type of reporting along the parade route was a pitiful
substitute for any substantive commentary about the
predominance of anti-Bush protesters clearly visible on
camera and audible on tape.

FLURRY OF MEDIA INTEREST BEFORE PROTESTS

In the days and weeks before the inauguration, reporters
constantly pursued protest organizers for information about
demonstration plans. Many attended pre-inaugural news
conferences held by organizers from the International Action
Center and other groups and lawyers from the Partnership for
Civil Justice. At these well-attended news conferences,
organizers explained protest plans and disseminated
information about the status of protest permits and the
legality of security checkpoints.

Some reporters asked permission to follow organizers around
for periods of time to observe them in action in the days
before Jan. 20.

C-SPAN aired two of the news conferences in their entirety,
and then repeated them.

One result of the exposure was that organizers received an
enormous response from the public.

Another development that may have resulted from the exposure
was a media pullback several days before the protests.

Stories filed for the Washington Post and ABC World News
Tonight, based on reporters' extensive interviews with IAC
leaders, were mysteriously put on hold. This was done at the
very time that a groundswell of organizing activity was
building the protests.

Rather than carrying the stories that more or less presented
the protesters' point of view of the Post and ABC instead
presented stories that hyped up the Secret Service's
ostensible notions about the inauguration coming under
missile attack, the need for unprecedented high-security
measures, description of security checkpoints and so on.

Imani Henry, an IAC organizer who staffed the mobilzation's
offices in Washington, said he thought that "this was a
relentless, targeted attempt to frighten Washington's large
Black and Latina/o population away from the Saturday
demonstrations, much as Bush forces tried to harass Black
voters away from the polls in Florida.

"The story about our protest was finally aired on World News
Tonight the next evening, but the scare tactic was already
out there in the community from the newspapers and TV the
day before."

'WE'RE NOT COVERING THE PROTESTS'

On Jan. 20, C-SPAN covered one-and-a-half hours of the
inaugural parade without commentary. This allowed viewers to
clearly hear the thunderous cacophony of the dissenting
protesters on TV and on C-SPAN's Web site.

However, C-SPAN was the exception rather than the rule.

During MSNBC's inaugural coverage, one commentator could be
heard saying, 

Re: [CTRL] Hitchens On Elie Wiesel

2001-02-06 Thread Samantha L.

-Caveat Lector-

In a message dated 2/6/01 6:12:25 PM Central Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:

 In a propaganda tour of recent history, he asserts that in 1948, "incited
  by their leaders, 600,000 Palestinians left the country convinced that,
once
  Israel was vanquished, they would be able to return home."
  This claim is a cheap lie and is known by Wiesel to be a lie.

  Is this indeed a lie?  I ask because 1) I obviously don't know  and 2) an
acquaintance passionate about Israeli politics recently claimed the very same
thing.  I  _thought_  the war caused them to be booted out, but I wasn't
positive so I couldn't respond.

Samantha

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Here's the new boss. Same as the old boss.

2001-02-06 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

   Bush appoints Mideast advisers
   By Janine Zacharia

   WASHINGTON (February 7) - The White House
   has announced two key State Department
   appointments that deal with Middle East affairs.

   White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said
   yesterday that President George W. Bush would
   appoint Marc Grossman, a former ambassador
   to Turkey and career diplomat as
   undersecretary of state for political affairs, to
   the No. 3 position at the State Department, and
   Richard Haass as director of policy planning with
   the rank of ambassador.

   Grossman has been a long-time proponent of a
   strong Israeli-Turkish alliance and has held
   various positions in the State Department,
   including several in the Bureau for Near East
   and South Asian Affairs. He is admired in the
   pro-Israel community.

   Haas, a former special assistant to president
   George Bush and senior director for Near East
   affairs on the National Security Council, has
   advocated a gradual, step-by-step approach in
   Israeli-Palestinian peace negotiations.

   He has been critical of US sanctions against Iran
   and was a formulator of US policy toward Israel
   when Likud prime minister Yitzhak Shamir tried
   to make his participation in the Madrid peace
   conference conditional on $10 billion in loan
   guarantees to help cover the cost of absorbing
   Soviet Jewish immigrants.

   Haas, who is currently vice president and
   director of foreign-policy studies at the
   Brookings Institution, is remembered for
   advocating a tough stance toward Israeli
   settlement construction while an adviser to
   Bush.

   With the closure of the office of special Middle
   East coordinator, Haas is expected to assume a
   beefed-up role in fashioning Middle East policy
   for the new administration. He will work with
   William Burns, currently ambassador to Jordan,
   who is expected to replace Ned Walker as
   assistant secretary of state for Near East affairs
   but has not been officially named to the post.

   Even more crucial than Haas or Grossman in
   developing Middle East policy, however, is likely
   to be John Hannah, who recently was selected
   by Vice President Dick Cheney to be his Middle
   East adviser.

   Cheney is expected to wield enormous influence
   on both foreign and domestic policy, and has
   assembled a wide advisory staff that includes
   numerous regional experts.

   Hannah, who has been described as a discreet
   but formidable analyst, has worked twice at the
   Washington Institute for Near East Policy, a
   leading Middle East think tank.

   Still conspicuously vacant among Bush
   foreign-policy appointments is the important
   No. 2 slot at the State Department, deputy
   secretary of state.

   Richard Armitage, a former assistant secretary
   of defense under president Ronald Reagan is
   expected to be named to the post.

   Search The Jerusalem Post:

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL 

Re: [CTRL] Flags (was: Ashcroft-The Artful Dodger)

2001-02-06 Thread Ynr Chyldz Wyld

-Caveat Lector-

From: "Aleisha Saba" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 So what the cotton gin did to free the slaves and blacks from mundane
 task of picking cotton

The cotton gin did no such thing.  In fact, it led to the GROWTH of slavery in the 
south.

The cotton gin has absolutely NOTHING to do with picking cotton; and the fact that you 
display such ignorance
as to what the cotton gin actually DID, suggests that your claims of southern heritage 
leave a lot to be
doubted...


 the computer will not do to those who think they
 are computer genius - many who cannot even type - and when compters are
 all talk operated that just leaves the brain to call the shots.

 Ah but the computer does know know the difference between loose and lose
 and council and counsel and read and red and bred as in well bred and
 bread.

Don't know what any of this has to do with the topic of slavery...but DAMN, Aleisha!  
What ARE those drugs you
are on?


 So we will still need a few honkies like June

No honkie...one-quarter Hunkie, tho...   ;-)



 ...and all my children have blonde hair and blue eyes and there
 will always be a demand for blonde haired blue eyed kids

By whom, exactly?


June

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Important: The CFR spin on the election of Sharon.

2001-02-06 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Sharon wins landslide victory in Israeli
  election

  Barak to leave politics

  February 6, 2001
  Web posted at: 10:14 p.m. EST
  (0314 GMT)


  In this story:

  Barak resigns as Labor leader

  'God help the Palestinians and
  Israelis'

  Winner must balance Knesset factions

  Bush calls Sharon with congratulations


  From staff and wire reports

  TEL AVIV, Israel -- Ariel Sharon now must assemble a new
  government after his overwhelming victory over incumbent Ehud
  Barak in Tuesday's special election for prime minister.

  In his victory speech, Sharon said Israel
  was embarking on a new path of
  "security and true peace," reinforcing
  his campaign message that he will
  provide security for Israel while
  continuing to negotiate peace with the
  Palestinians.

  The ex-general, nicknamed "The
  Bulldozer," gave his victory speech
  three hours after Israeli TV exit polls
  projected his landslide victory. It was a
  stunning comeback for the 72-year-old
  Likud party leader, whose election was
  once thought nearly impossible. His
  supporters danced with joy while
  shouts of "The end of Oslo!" were
  heard, referring to the interim peace
  accord that Sharon opposed. (More on
  Sharon's victory speech)

  Barak resigns as Labor leader

  With 90.6 percent of the vote counted,
  Sharon led Barak, 62.1 percent to 37.8
  percent, which outstripped even the
  initial exit poll projections by Israeli
  television.

  The vote was a stinging rebuke of
  Barak, who conceded defeat an hour
  after the exit polls were released. He
  also surprised his supporters by saying
  he would resign his seat in the Knesset,
  Israel's parliament, step down as head
  of the Labor Party as soon as a new
  government was formed and retire from
  politics for now.

  But Barak said his pursuit of peace with
  the Palestinians was the "one and only
  true path" and that his government was
  ahead of its time.

  "Friends, we have lost a battle but we
  will win the war," the 58-year-old Barak
  said. (More on Barak's concession
  speech)

  Many Israelis were turned off by both
  candidates and their disgust was
  reflected in the turnout, estimated by
  Israeli election officials to be around 62
  percent of the 4.5 million eligible voters.
  That is a sharp drop from the 1999
  election turnout of 78.7 percent.
  Israel's voting average of close to 80
  percent is among the democratic
  world's highest.

  Arab Israelis, traditionally supporters of
  Barak's Labor Party, apparently
  boycotted the election as voter turnout
  was low throughout all Israeli Arab
  villages, according to the Israeli-Arab
  Center for Equality. Arab Israelis were
  angered by the fatal shooting of 13
  Israeli Arabs by police during riots in
  October.

  Winner must balance Knesset
  factions

  Once official results are announced on
  February 13, Sharon will have 45 days
  to form a new government. Barak
  remains prime minister in a caretaker
  role until Sharon assumes office.

  Sharon also must work with a deeply
  divided Knesset whose members did
  not face Tuesday's election, which was
  the first in which Israeli voters elected
  only the prime minister.

  His first big hurdle will be passing the
  2001 budget, which must be approved
  by the Knesset by March 31. If that
  deadline passes without a budget, new
  elections would be called for both the
  parliament and the prime minister.

  After he won, Sharon 

[CTRL] Bush picks Wolfowitz for No. 2 Pentagon job [ Yet another CFR retread.]

2001-02-06 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Bush picks Wolfowitz for No. 2 Pentagon job
http://www.baltimoresun.com/content/news/story?section=newspagename=storys
toryid=1150540217646

Hopkins dean opposed limited strikes on Iraq in Desert Fox campaign

By Tom Bowman
Sun National Staff
Originally published Feb 6 2001

WASHINGTON - Three years ago, as President Clinton prepared to dispatch U.S.
aircraft against Iraq in what became the "Desert Fox" bombing campaign, Paul
Wolfowitz thought such a limited strike was unwise.

"Absent a strategy, absent any follow-up, [airstrikes] strengthen Saddam
Hussein in the region and his own country," said Wolfowitz, who served as a
top Pentagon official during the Persian Gulf war before becoming dean of
the Johns Hopkins Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies in
Washington.

Wolfowitz was among those who favored creating a haven in southern Iraq
where opposition groups and renegade Iraqi soldiers could regroup, possibly
under the protection of the U.S. military.

Now he will have a chance to mold such policies from the Pentagon. President
Bush said yesterday that he would nominate the quiet and cerebral Wolfowitz
to the No. 2 post at the Pentagon, where he would serve as deputy to new
Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld. The position requires Senate
confirmation.

Wolfowitz, 57, of Chevy Chase, was one of candidate Bush's top foreign
policy and defense advisers and was a frontrunner for the top Defense job.
But some Bush advisers said Wolfowitz lacked the managerial skills to run
the sprawling Pentagon, which has overwhelmed many seasoned bureaucrats with
its battling fiefdoms and complex weapons programs.

A New York native who studied mathematics and chemistry at Cornell
University before earning a master's degree and doctorate in political
science at the University of Chicago, Wolfowitz worked for President Reagan
as head of policy planning at the State Department before becoming assistant
secretary of state for East Asian and Pacific Affairs.

In 1986, Reagan appointed Wolfowitz as U.S. ambassador to Indonesia, a post
he held until 1989. In the previous Bush administration, Wolfowitz served as
undersecretary of defense for policy planning.

Wolfowitz played an important role when the U.S.-led coalition went to war
in the Persian Gulf region in 1991 to drive Iraqi forces out of Kuwait. As
Iraqi Scud missiles struck Israel, Bush sent him to help persuade Israel not
to retaliate, which could have upset the coalition's Arab partners. It was a
delicate mission, but ultimately proved successful.

Since becoming dean at SAIS in 1994, Wolfowitz has weighed in frequently on
national security issues. He urged greater support for Iraqi opposition
groups in their quest to oust Hussein. And he echoed the concerns of others
that North Korea, Iran and other so-called rogue states were building
missiles that could strike the United States.

Three years ago, when Rumsfeld headed a commission that spotlighted such
dangers, he found an ally in Wolfowitz. The CIA was "wrong" in minimizing
the threat, Wolfowitz told The Sun.

The spy agency, he argued, underestimated the role played by foreign trade
and technology transfers in helping potential aggressors develop ballistic
missiles capable of reaching American soil. "People who want these things
can get these things," he said.

"He's definitely a policy guy. He's able to see the big picture," said a
former U.S. official who has worked with Wolfowitz on Iraqi opposition
matters.

But in Baltimore there are mixed feelings. Hopkins President William R.
Brody said: "The bad news is that Johns Hopkins is losing a great dean. The
good news is that the country is getting a very smart, very focused,
clear-thinking leader as deputy secretary of defense."

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research 

Re: [CTRL] Fw: [CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore wonFlorida

2001-02-06 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

Amelia wrote:

 -Caveat Lector-

 Yes, Steve, Gore will always be a winner with the communists
 and socialists as they march us right along to the gulag.

This is ridiculous crap.

J2


 It seems to all be a matter of perception and very
 subjective.  That is why no accurate count can be made of
 ballots long after the fact of the election.
 Amelia

 - Original Message -
 From: "Steve Wingate" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Tuesday, February 06, 2001 3:57 AM
 Subject: [CTRL] Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won
 Florida

  -Caveat Lector-
 
  --- Forwarded message follows ---
  Date sent:  Mon, 05 Feb 2001 12:27:35 -0800
  From:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject:SNET: Newspaper studies confirm
 Democrat Gore won Florida vote
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Copies to:  Cosmic Comentary
 [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
  [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 
  World Socialist Web Site www.wsws.org
  WSWS : News  Analysis : North America : US Politics
 
  Newspaper studies confirm Democrat Gore won Florida vote
 
  By Patrick Martin
  5 February 2001
 
  Two newly published studies of the ballots cast in the US
 presidential
  election confirm that Democrat Al Gore was the choice of
 more Florida
  voters than Republican George W. Bush, who was installed
 as president
  after an unprecedented and anti-democratic intervention by
 the US
  Supreme Court.
 
  One study was conducted by the Washington Post, the other
 by Tribune
  Co., which owns the Chicago Tribune, the Orlando Sentinel,
 and the Fort
  Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel. The Post endorsed Gore
 editorially in the
  November election, while the Tribune endorsed Bush.
 

 A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
 DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
 ==
 CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
 screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
 sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
 directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
 major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
 That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
 always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
 credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

 Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.
 
 Archives Available at:
 http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
  A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

 http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
  A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A
 
 To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
 SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 Om

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] [Fwd: ALL SIDES NOW COMMITTED TO ESCALATION]

2001-02-06 Thread Nurev Ind Research

-Caveat Lector-

 Original Message 
Subject: ALL SIDES NOW COMMITTED TO ESCALATION
Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2001 09:29:24 -0600 (CST)
From: MER [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Organization: MiD-EasT RealitieS
To: undisclosed-recipients:;

   ___      __
  /  |/  /  /___/  / /_ //M I D - E A S T   R E A L I T I E S
 / /|_/ /  /_/_   / /\\ Making Sense of the Middle East
/_/  /_/  /___/  /_/  \\http://www.MiddleEast.Org

  News, Information,  Analysis That Governments, Interest Groups,
 and the Corporate Media Don't Want You To Know!
  *  *  *  *  *  *  *
  IF YOU DON'T GET MER, YOU JUST DON'T GET IT!
 To receive MER regularly email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

 ALL SIDES NOW COMMITTED TO ESCALATION

MID-EAST REALITIES  - www.MiddleEast.Org - Washington - 2/06:
Now the real craziness begins.  The Palestinians are committed to heating things
up to demonstrate their resolve and their capabilities.  The Israelis are
committed
to "stopping the violence" which means clamping the boot down on the Palestinians
even more harshly -- and even Shimon Peres has already announced he is eager
to join a Sharon "national unity" government.  The Americans are tied to the
Israelis for good or bad; their military forces are on alert and military
supplies,
including Patriot missiles, are already flowing into Israel under various covers.
 And the Arabs remain too weak, divided, and co-opted to do anything serious;
fearing more than loathing Israel.  It's all a powderkeg waiting for ignition;
and the two articles that follow help set the stage for whatever is now to
come:

 FEAR SPURS VOTERS INTO ARMS OF SHARON

Palestinian threats help to seal
 the prime minister's expected
   political doom

[The Guardian - Suzanne Goldberg in Jerusalem, Tuesday February 6]:
Palestinian militants said last night that they were poised to attack
targets in Israel on the eve of today's election, which is expected to make
Ariel Sharon the country's next prime minister.

The warning came as Israeli soldiers tried to tighten their grip on the
West Bank and Gaza Strip before the "day of rage" which leaders of Yasser
Arafat's Fatah movement say marks the start of an intensification of the
four-month uprising.

The army fired rocket-propelled grenades into the Palestinian refugee camp
of Rafah, on the border between Gaza and Egypt, after an Israeli soldier on
his way to vote in the early ballot staged for the army was killed by a
bullet fired from the camp.

Israel also shut down the Palestinian airport in Gaza and the Rafah
crossing to Egypt.

Police reinforcements were moved to the northern towns in Galilee, where a
call for Israeli Arabs to boycott the election could lead to clashes.

With yesterday's opinion polls showing him leading the incumbent prime
minister, Ehud Barak, by as much as 22 points, Mr Sharon could be stepping
into a ready-made confrontation.

Yesterday he was challenged not only by the Fatah militias, which have led
the protests in the West Bank and Gaza, but also by the militant group
Islamic Jihad, which has claimed responsibility for at least two car
bombings in Israel in the past four months.

"Our operations will continue and increase. We will carry out powerful
blows against the criminal entity within the coming few days," Islamic
Jihad said in a statement delivered before yesterday's funeral of a bomber
who was shot dead trying to scale the fence sealing off Gaza.

"No barriers, wire fences, or security measures will prevent us from
carrying out painful strikes against the enemy."

In the West Bank city of Ramallah, meanwhile, an important Fatah leader
declared that the Palestinians would give no quarter to Mr Sharon.

Hussein Sheikh, who commands Fatah's militiamen in the West Bank, said:
"The next days and weeks are going to be hard, and the area will witness an
escalation in the field.

"We have declared a general state of emergency and we have orders to
escalate the intifada."

Mr Barak spent the final moments of his campaign yesterday warning Israelis
that the former general Sharon could lead them into a war.

"The Middle East is a powder keg," he wrote in the Yediot Ahronoth,
Israel's best-selling paper.

"We are being called to decide whether to give the match to extremists,
people who are too extreme for Israel. We are being called to decide
whether between us and peace lies another bloody war."

But Israelis seemed to be in no mood to listen. After four months of
bloodshed in the West Bank and Gaza Strip, people have lost faith not only
in Mr Barak but in the entire seven years of negotiations started by the
assassinated prime minister Yitzhak Rabin, according to research published
yesterday by the Israel Democracy Institute.

An opinion survey carried out last month found that only 22% of Israelis
believed that a peace deal with the Palestinians would end nearly 53 years
of 

[CTRL] Tensions high as U.S. Patriot missiles arrive in Israel

2001-02-06 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Tensions high as U.S. Patriot missiles arrive in Israel

By Steve Rodan, Middle East Newsline
SPECIAL TO WORLD TRIBUNE.COM
Tuesday, February 6, 2001
TEL AVIV — A U.S. Army brigade carrying Patriot anti-aircraft missiles has
arrived in Israel as both Israeli and Arab military sources reported
heightened regional tensions.

The U.S. brigade from the 69th Air Defense Artillery arrived in Haifa and is
preparing for an exercise, called Juniper Cobra. The exercise — beginning
Thursday and lasting 14 days — is one component of plans to increase
U.S.-Israeli defense coordination amid threats of regional war that could
involve Iraq and Syria.


--

--

January 26, 2001 - Patriot anti-missile battery deployed to Israel

--

--
The sources described Israeli, Iraqi and Lebanese military movements over the
weekend. In Lebanon, the Hizbullah movement deployed short-range rockets near
the Israeli border.
Arab military sources said Israel and Hizbullah have beefed up their forces
near the border with Lebanon. On late Sunday, the sources reported
intensified Israeli patrols, deployment of additional tanks as well as
fortified military and civilian outposts.

For its part, Hizbullah was reported to have brought in new batteries of
Katyusha rockets. These include rockets with a range of 70 kilometers,
capable of striking the northern city of Haifa.

In Beirut, Hizbullah deputy chief Naim Kassem said Hizbullah was ready to
confront Israel. Kassem said Israel was confused and the leadership was under
immense strain.

Israeli sources said Iraq continues to bolster its forces near the Syrian and
Jordanian borders. They said nearly two Iraqi divisions are near the Syrian
border in what appears to be a move coordinated with the regime in Damascus.

The London-based Sunday Times reported that both the Syrian and Israeli
militaries are on full alert.

The United States has relayed messages to Damascus not to cooperate with
Baghdad's plans to escalate tension. On Sunday, U.S. officials called for
restraint, particularly in the Israeli-Palestinian mini-war in the West Bank
and Gaza Strip.

Israeli military source said the arrival of the Patriot battery does not
effectively strengthen defense capabilities. The Patriot was developed as an
anti-aircraft missile. But since the Gulf war, Raytheon has improved the
missile so that it can intercept enemy projectiles.

But defense sources said the Patriot is simply too slow to intercept the more
advanced missiles being developed by Egypt, Syria and Iran.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Israels Sharon triumphs: now what?

2001-02-06 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Israel’s Sharon triumphs: now what?



Ariel Sharon, leader of the Likud party, waves to his supporters as Likud
Parliament members applaud him early Wednesday morning after polls pointed to
his strong victory over Ehud Barak.




  JERUSALEM, Feb. 7 —   Right-wing hawk Ariel Sharon proclaimed “a new
path” for Israel on Wednesday after crushing the liberal Prime Minister Ehud
Barak in Tuesday’s election. Sharon, a former general noted for his hard-line
stance on Palestinians, won a staggering 62 percent of the vote in an Israel
grown weary after five months of Israeli-Palestinian clashes. In Sharon’s
promise to the Israeli public of “a different kind of peace process,” some
saw hope for unity, while others saw only the potential for even greater
conflict.



“THE STATE OF ISRAEL has entered a new path ... the path of security
and true peace,” the 72-year-old Sharon told cheering, chanting supporters at
his campaign headquarters early Wednesday. He called on Palestinians to
abandon “the way of violence” and urged his vanquished opponent, Barak, to
join forces with him in a broad-based national government.
   Sharon, 72, also said U.S. President George W. Bush had called to
congratulate him and to urge close cooperation. Later he said that he’d also
received a call from Secretary of State Colin Powell and that Powell and the
U.S. president had said they would help continue peace process.
   With 99 percent of the vote counted, Sharon had 62.5 percent of the
vote to Barak’s 37.4 percent, an even wider margin than predicted by exit
polls that had given Sharon 59.5 percent. After Israeli television released
the results of the exit polls, Sharon’s supporters in Tel Aviv whistled,
clapped and blew horns, waving blue-and-white banners. “The end of Oslo!”
some shouted, referring to the interim peace accord that Sharon has always
opposed.



Sharon’s victory speech was characteristically tough and
uncompromising, NBC’s Martin Fletcher reported, but the Likud Party leader
did leave the door open to resume peace talks. Sharon said a peace agreement
“requires difficult compromises from both sides,” but did not say what
concessions he was willing to make.
   Turning to the Palestinians, Sharon urged them to “to abandon the path
of violence and return to the path of dialogue and solving the problems
between us by peaceful means.”
   However, he suggested that Jerusalem would be off-limits in future
negotiations. “The government I shall form will work to strengthen and build
the united Jerusalem, Israel’s capital and the capital of the Jewish people
for all eternity,” Sharon said.
   Speaking of Jerusalem in his speech Wednesday, Sharon quoted a
biblical verse often cited to express Jewish ties to the city: “If I forget
thee, O Jerusalem, may my right hand wither.”
   The Palestinians want the traditionally Arab East Jerusalem as a
capital for a future Palestinian state. Barak had agreed to hand at least
some of the Arab neighborhoods over to Palestinian control, but the deal was
rejected by Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat and Barak’s government fell
apart over his even making the offer. Several weeks later, a visit by Sharon
to a Jerusalem site holy to both Muslims and Jews sparked Palestinian riots,
the beginning of months of violence that became known as the “Al-Aqsa
intifada.”
   The prospects for talks that exclude compromise on Jerusalem appeared
dim. After Sharon’s victory speech Palestinians’ chief negotiator Saeb
Erekat countered that any talks would have to resume where they broke off
under the Barak — meaning Sharon would have to adopt positions he has
bitterly opposed.
   “We cannot go back to point zero,” Erekat said. That would be “a
recipe for war,” he added.
   This first blush of rhetoric sketched out the gap — if not impasse —
that would have to be resolved before any progress can be made.

 Opinion: A landslide of woe


POLITICAL UNCERTAINTY
   Once complete election results are announced, within eight days,
Sharon will have 45 days to form a coalition government and get it approved
by Israel’s parliament, or Knesset. Because no lawmakers’ seats were at
stake, Sharon inherits the same sharply divided Knesset that Barak faced.
Barak will remain a caretaker prime
   minister while Sharon works to form a government.

   Many analysts say it could be just as difficult for Sharon to form a
stable government as it was for Barak — and that his term in office could be
even shorter than that of Barak, who governed less than two years.
   Immediately after the first exit polls were announced, Sharon made an
offer to Barak to join in a national unity government. The right-wing and
religious parties do not form a solid majority in Israel’s fractured

[CTRL] Rule to Ban Road Development in Forests Hits Snag

2001-02-06 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Monday February 5 4:52 PM ET
Rule to Ban Road Development in Forests Hits Snag

By Christopher Doering

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The Bush administration has delayed until May 12 a
plan by former President Clinton (news - web sites) to ban road construction
and timber harvesting on nearly 60 million acres of forest land, the
government said on Monday.

The new regulations are among several that were put on hold by President
George W. Bush (news - web sites) immediately after he was inaugurated on
January 20. The announcement of the decision appeared in Monday's Federal
Register, the government's official log.

The roadless rule along with other delayed regulations is undergoing a 60-day
review by Bush administration officials.

The ban, approved by Clinton two weeks before he left office, would restrict
road construction and the removal of oil and lumber in 58.5 million acres
(23.67 million hectares) of forest land, unless it was necessary for
environmental reasons or to reduce the risk of wildfires.

``Currently, the department is reviewing a number of regulations in
accordance of the guidelines set forth on January 20 with the temporary
60-day delay,'' said Kevin Herglotz, a spokesman for the U.S. Agriculture
Department.

``No decisions have been made yet on'' the roadless rules plan, he said.

The final roadless plan was issued by the Forest Service, which is part of
the USDA, in January.

The former Texas governor and other Republicans have lobbied to open land
such as the Alaska's Tongass National Forest, which would be protected as
part of the roadless rule.

Still, it is unlikely Bush will have much success in overturning the roadless
ban because it is already a rule of law. Regulations become law once they are
printed in the Federal Register.

Environmental groups say the road ban is needed to protect unspoiled forest
and animal habitat from ``irreversible damage.''

Some groups are worried that Republican lawmakers such as Sen. Larry Craig
(news - bio - voting record) of Ohio or Sen. Frank Murkowski (news - bio -
voting record) of Alaska could find alternate ways to derail the roadless
rule.

Murkowski, who heads the Senate Energy Committee, predicted in January the
roadless ban would be challenged in court or reviewed by Congress because of
alleged violations committed during the rulemaking process, such as improper
notice of public sessions.

One option is through the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act
of 1996. The act, which has never been used, allows for a regulation to be
voted on by Congress if its impact on the economy exceeds $100 million per
year. If both the House and Senate were to vote against the roadless act, the
president could then kill the regulation, according to environmental groups.

This is a move by ``the Bush administration and the timber industry's allies
in Congress to give themselves time to develop a strategy on how they are
going to stop wild forest protection,'' said Sean Cosgrove, a forest policy
specialist with the Sierra Club (news - web sites).

``It would be foolish to attack (the plan) and take it apart. I don't think
they want the fight,'' he said.

The plan, first orchestrated by Forest Service in February 1999, received
some 1.7 million letters and faxes from the public, the largest outpouring of
comments on a federal environmental measure.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory 

[CTRL] Clinton-Gore Rift Fueled Blunt Exchange of Views (washingtonpost.com)

2001-02-06 Thread tnohava



 http://washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A35807-2001Feb6.html
Clinton-Gore Rift Fueled Blunt Exchange of Views
 _Video_

 • The Post's Harris on the Clinton-Gore Rift




_Past Coverage_

• Post Series: Deadlock: The Inside Story of America's Closest Election
• Complete Coverage: The Florida Recount




_OnPolitics_

• Latest Political News
• E-mail Updates





  E-Mail This Article

  Printer-Friendly Version

  Subscribe to The Post





By John F. Harris
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, February 7, 2001; Page A1



They were two political partners who had barely spoken for a year, but a few
days after Al Gore conceded the 2000 presidential election, he and Bill
Clinton were finally talking face to face.


For more than an hour, in what sources close to both men described as
uncommonly blunt language, Gore forcefully told Clinton that his sex scandal
and low personal approval ratings were a major impediment to his
presidential campaign. Clinton, according to people close to him, was
initially taken aback but responded with equal force that it was Gore's
failure to run on the administration's record that hobbled his ambitions.


The White House meeting, which Gore sought, was a doleful postscript to a
relationship that once was exceptionally close but had deteriorated badly
over the course of Gore's 2000 race. Its significance, however, was more
than personal. The question the two men were debating – why did Gore not
capture the White House? – is the same one confronting Democrats broadly as
they assess the lessons of 2000.


If Gore hopes to seek the presidency again, moreover, several Democratic
strategists say he will almost certainly need to establish a better footing
for his relationship with Clinton – who remains a powerful figure within the
party despite the blunders that marked his exit from the White House.


Only Clinton and Gore were present for the showdown session, which never
appeared even on internal schedules distributed to White House staff. But
people close to both have described its tone in similar language. "Tense"
was the description of one adviser to Clinton, while a Gore aide called it
"cathartic." One Democrat who has worked closely with both men called the
session "very, very blunt."


Where descriptions differ is on the conclusion of the meeting. Some
Democrats who heard descriptions from one or the other of the two
participants said the meeting essentially ratified what for many months had
been an unspoken truth between the two men: Their relationship suffered
irreparable harm in the wake of the Monica S. Lewinsky scandal and Clinton's
lies to Gore and the nation about it. Gore, said one Democrat, "seemed eager
to get things off his chest."


Others put a more upbeat cast on the session, calling it a useful
air-clearing that should allow the two men to move forward. "They had to
cover a lot of territory," said one Democrat close to Clinton and Gore. "My
impression was it was a very constructive meeting."


"He felt it was a very good conversation," said one adviser to the former
vice president.


Jake Siewert, a spokesman for Clinton, and Kiki McLean, a spokeswoman for
Gore, said their bosses would not comment on a private conversation.


Gore and Clinton saw each other several times after the talk but before the
end of the administration and also spoke by phone; aides said these
conversations were polite, but not consequential.


And they have not come close to finding common ground on why Gore is not
president today. In fact, on this large issue and several minor ones, there
are open wounds between the camps of Democratic aides allied with one man or
the other – resentments that have been rubbed anew since Jan. 20.


Many Clinton advisers were infuriated by a post-election analysis Gore
consultant Carter Eskew published Jan. 30 in The Washington Post in which he
said the "deep dissatisfaction and anger" felt by swing voters over
Clinton's scandals was "the elephant in the living room" preventing Gore
from making his case.


A senior White House official close to Clinton scoffed: "I don't think the
fact that they lost four out of four debates had anything to do with Bill
Clinton." By this reckoning, neither Gore nor his running mate, Sen. Joseph
I. Lieberman (D-Conn.), made a compelling case in showdowns against
President Bush and Vice President Cheney.


As a general rule, aides close to Clinton say, he was less upset than often
reported by Gore's efforts to distance himself publicly from the president.
And, with the exception of the last 10 days or so of the general election –
when he desperately wanted to hit the road in key states but was told no by
the Gore campaign – he did not expect a significant role as a Gore proxy.
But he was mystified, and at times angered, by Gore's refusal to run on the
strong economy and other issues in which Clinton felt both he and his vice
president deserved credit. Just as voters made a distinction 

[CTRL] New, Deadly HIV Strain May Already Be Spreading Worldwide

2001-02-06 Thread Steve Wingate

-Caveat Lector-

February 6 , 2001

New, Deadly HIV Strain May Already Be Spreading Worldwide

BBC News

A newly discovered form of HIV may already have been transmitted world-
wide, experts have warned. They fear that current treatments and
experimental vaccines will prove ineffective against this new form of the
deadly virus.

It was first detected in blood samples taken from an Aids patient in Cyprus
who died in 1998.

However, a medical team in Seoul, South Korea, has announced that they
have detected the same form of the deadly virus in a 33-year-old
female with Aids who died in 1997.

Professors Choi Kang-won and Oh Myong-don, of Seoul National
University (SNU), said the HIV collected from the blood of the woman had a
totally different gene structure than the usual form of HIV. However, it was
the same as the samples taken from the patient in Cyprus.

New vaccines needed

Professor Choi said: "The outcome of our research shows that a new
variety of HIV exists in the nation.

"We, therefore, need to develop Aids vaccines to cope with new types of
HIV."

Professor Choi said the Korean woman had worked as a prostitute in the
southern port city of Pusan.

This could mean that other people had already been infected with the new
form of the disease.

The US and South Korean teams are expected to give more details of their
discovery at the 8th Conference on Retroviruses and Opportunistic
Infections being held this week in Chicago.

Professor Choi stressed that new virus was not a mutation of other HIV
strains.

He suspects that the new form of the virus may have originated in Africa.

According to the United Nations, 36.1 million people either had the HIV
virus or had developed Aids by the end of 2000.

Several experimental vaccines for HIV are currently undergoing tests world-
wide. However, there are not effective for all forms of the disease.

There are two recognised forms of HIV, known as HIV-1 and HIV-2.

It is thought that the newly discovered form is a sub-type of HIV-1.

Mutate rapidly

Mark Graver, of the UK HIV charity Terrence Higgins Trust Lighthouse,
said: "Because of the class of viruses to which it belongs and its rate of
reproduction, HIV-1 can mutate particularly rapidly.

"This is one of the reasons why anti-HIV combination therapy can fail if a
person is not able to take their medication correctly.

"HIV reproduces in the presence of the drugs and can mutate to become
insensitive to them.

"Apart from drug-resistant mutations of HIV-1, there are a number of
different variants or strains of HIV-1 known around the world.

"Some of these strains are more common in one country than in another.

"Any vaccine which is developed to give immunity to infection will, of
necessity, have to be active against all these possible variations and
mutations of HIV-1."


ANOMALOUS IMAGES AND UFO FILES
http://www.anomalous-images.com

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] AP: Ex-president's office says he was unaware of pending criminal probe

2001-02-06 Thread MICHAEL SPITZER

-Caveat Lector-

"Braswell's pardon application was made at the last minute and was among
about two dozen that bypassed the traditional route through the Justice
Department and the FBI and went straight to the White House."


Ex-president's office says he was unaware of pending criminal probe
4.56 p.m. ET (2212 GMT) February 6, 2001

By Pete Yost
Associated Press


WASHINGTON (AP) - Former President Clinton's office says he was
unaware of a criminal investigation of a wealthy businessman
pardoned on Clinton's last day in office.

Federal prosecutors are investigating herbal remedy marketer
Almon Glenn Braswell for possible tax evasion and money
laundering, a federal law enforcement source in Los Angeles said
Tuesday.

Braswell, 57, was among 140 people Clinton pardoned on
Inauguration Day. The pardon, which covered Braswell's 1983
conviction for fraud and other crimes, restored his civil rights.

"No one knew of any ongoing criminal investigation'' at the time
of the pardon, Clinton's office said in a statement.

The former president's office also said, "No one at the White
House who reviewed this matter had any intention of the pardon
covering anything other than the infraction from 1983.''

U.S. News  World Report first reported on the pending criminal
investigation during the weekend.

After the pardon was announced, some federal officials worried
that Clinton might have pardoned Braswell for any criminal
charges that could arise from the current investigation.

However, Clinton's one-page pardon states that Braswell is
receiving an executive grant of clemency for "his convictions ...
on three indictments for which he was sentenced on Dec. 5,
1983.''

Braswell's conviction stems from false claims about the
effectiveness of a treatment for baldness. He was sentenced to
three years in federal prison followed by five years' probation.

Braswell's pardon application was made at the last minute and was
among about two dozen that bypassed the traditional route through
the Justice Department and the FBI and went straight to the White
House.

The Florida Republican Party and the George W. Bush campaign last
fall returned $175,000 in contributions from Braswell after
learning he was a convicted felon.

http://www.cyberspaceorbit.com/angels/seraphim.html

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Ecuador's Indians win face time with president after day of bloody clashes

2001-02-06 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

Tuesday, February 6 8:12 PM SGT

Ecuador's Indians win face time with president after day of
bloody clashes
QUITO, Feb 6 (AFP) -
President Gustavo Noboa was to meet with Indian protesters
for negotiations Tuesday, four days after he had ruled out
such a meeting and declared a state of emergency to rein in
massive protests.

The meeting was announced late Monday after a one hour
meeting between the two sides at the presidential palace
here, and following a day in which three Indians were killed
and 29 others wounded in clashes between protesters and
security forces.

The breakthrough was announced by Nina Pacari, a political
spokeswoman for the Confederation of Indigenous
Nationalities of Ecuador (CONAIE). There was no immediate
confirmation from the government.

"Under a compromise worked out at the meeting, police have
already begun to withdraw from the Salesian Polytechnic
University," she said.

The local university was the site of a clash earlier Monday
between security forces and Indians who have occupied the
campus since January 29.

Moving in on foot and horseback, about 80 police used tear
gas to try to remove some 6,000 protesters, but were
repelled by Indians brandishing wooden spears posted at
entrances to the campus.

That confrontation followed the deaths of three Indians
during an operation by security forces to forcibly remove
about 700 protesters blocking a bridge at Puerto Napo, 120
kilometers (75 miles) southeast of Quito, according to Red
Cross officials.

The Indians are protesting scarcity measures imposed at the
start of the year, including a 100 percent hike in the cost
of fuel and 75 percent rise in public transportation costs.

They are also protesting the replacement last year of the
local currency, the sucre, with the US dollar. The
dollarization process was accompanied by 91 percent
inflation.

Noboa had declared a state of emergency Friday following the
collapse of negotiations, after Indians demanded to meet
with him and he refused.

Representing the Indians in talks with Noboa Tuesday will be
Antonio Vargas, the 40-year-old president of CONAIE, who was
a key player in a coup d'etat on January 21, 2000 which
toppled then-president Jamil Mahuad.

Backed by 10,000 Indians who flooded downtown Quito, Vargas
was part of a three-member civilian-military government that
lasted only four hours before handing power over to Noboa,
Mahuad's vice president.

Though Noboa, by all accounts, has the support of the
military in defending against the indigenous uprising, his
popularity among Ecuador's civilians is declining rapidly.

Noboa began his mandate in January, 2000, with 51 percent of
the country backing him.

In a poll released Monday, however, his numbers had
plummeted to just 28 percent, with 54 percent of Ecuadorans
registering support for the indigenous protests.



Questions or Comments
Copyright © 2000 AFP. All rights reserved. All information
displayed in this section (dispatches, photographs, logos)
are protected by intellectual property rights owned by
Agence France-Presse. As a consequence you may not copy,
reproduce, modify, transmit, publish, display or in any way
commercially exploit any of the contents of this section
without the prior written consent of Agence France-Presses.

Copyright © 1994-2001 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



Re: [CTRL] Important: The CFR spin on the election of Sharon.

2001-02-06 Thread John Cone

-Caveat Lector-

--- Nurev Ind Research [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 -Caveat Lector-

 Sharon wins landslide victory in Israeli election.
Ariel Sharon now must assemble a new government
his overwhelming victory over incumbent Ehud Barak
in Tuesday's special election for prime minister.
__

Nakano comments:

Does anyone think Ehud Barak will now trash the
Prime Minister's Home and steal everything that
isn't nailed down as he departs?
Will all the silverware, china, and fine furniture
be missing when Barak leaves?
Will the Israeli "Air Force One" be stripped bare?
Did Barak rush through more than 200 pardons last
night just before the election?
Will the people of Israel now have to pay $750,000
per year for an office for the former Prime Minister?

Of course the answer is "No" to all of the above,
just as the answer is "Yes" in the case of Bill
Clinton
leaving the White House.
It was an appropriate exit for a president who
set new standards for low-class sleaze and
corruption while in office.
Bush may, or may not, be a good President.
But at least they won't have to count the
silverware when he leaves the White House.

 Regards to All
   Nakano







__
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Auctions - Buy the things you want at great prices.
http://auctions.yahoo.com/

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Scientists Revisit Cannibal Massacre

2001-02-06 Thread Agent Starling



Scientists Revisit Cannibal MassacreTeam to 
Use X-Ray Analysis to Seek Proofof Infamous Coloradoan's 
Innocence

By Amanda Onion

Feb. 7  There is no question Alferd Packer ate the 
flesh of his five companions while trekking through the barren, snowy San Juan 
Mountains. The beady-eyed prospector admitted to as much during his trial more 
than 100 years ago. But what remains in question  at least in 
some researchers' minds  is whether Colorado's most famous man-eater was also a 
murderer, or merely a man acting in self-defense who then helped himself to the 
flesh of his already-slain friends. 

http://www.abcnews.go.com/sections/us/DailyNews/Packer010207.html
 Need a Daily Pep Talk? Subscribe 
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dpt 
 Get Current 
Events, Politics, News, Issues, Views  Opinion... A 
Wholelottaotherlinx in your inbox daily subscribe at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
~My Chat Addresses: 
ICQ: 103814927 Y! Messenger: Kazzmir MS Messenger: Kazzmir AOL 
Messenger: xmulvax


[CTRL] Cleanliness is ...

2001-02-06 Thread Euphorix

-Caveat Lector-

Go to this site and get some perspective on the American paradigm for solving
internal strife:

http://www.fff.org/freedom/1099d.htm

Ethnic Cleansing, American-Style
by James Bovard, October 1999
AER
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust

The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational
tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the
State among its hapless subjects.  His task is to demonstrate
repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the
"democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist
by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse
of objective necessity.  He strives to show that the existence of
taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between
the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled.  He seeks to show that
the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State
has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to
accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a
share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded
subjects.
[[For a New Liberty:  The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard,
Fox  Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]]

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] Lurker prowls Web to clarify issues, answer questions

2001-02-06 Thread Agent Starling



Lurker prowls Web to clarify issues, answer 
questions By Chris WoodyardUSA TODAY

His name evokes a menacing image.

The Lurker. The Starwood Lurker.

Every workday, the Lurker trolls the Internet. He dips into 
frequent-traveler electronic bulletin boards to check the postings about his 
employer, Starwood Hotels  Resorts. He ferrets out comments on any of the 
big hotel chains that operate under Starwood's corporate umbrella -- Westin, 
Sheraton, St. Regis or W. 

http://www.usatoday.com/usatonline/20010206/3045048s.htm
 Need a Daily Pep Talk? Subscribe 
at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dpt 
 Get Current 
Events, Politics, News, Issues, Views  Opinion... A 
Wholelottaotherlinx in your inbox daily subscribe at [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
~My Chat Addresses: 
ICQ: 103814927 Y! Messenger: Kazzmir MS Messenger: Kazzmir AOL 
Messenger: xmulvax


[CTRL] 'Million Mom' activist convicted in shooting

2001-02-06 Thread Amelia

-Caveat Lector-

Subject: 'Million Mom' activist convicted in shooting

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=216
17


'Million Mom' activist convicted in shooting
Bereaved mother shot wrong man after son killed

By Jon Dougherty
© 2001 WorldNetDaily.com


A bereaved mother whose son was shot and killed nearly two
years ago -- and
who spoke out against gun violence and memorialized shooting
victims at the
"Million Mom March" rally in Washington, D.C., last Mother's
Day -- was
herself convicted of shooting a man she wrongly believed was
her son's
killer.

Barbara Graham, the Washington Post reported Thursday, "was
found guilty in
D.C. Superior Court S of trying to avenge her son's death by
shooting a
young man" last year that "she blamed for the killing."

Graham, who lost her own son in 1999 in a shooting death at
a Martin Luther
King, Jr. rally, became active in a Washington-area group,
"Mothers on the
Move Spiritually," in the months following her son's death.
The group
helped sponsor the MMM event, where Graham "spoke out S and
helped
memorialize the dead," the paper said.

The Million Moms March, which becomes nine months old as an
organization
Feb. 14, has become one of the nation's leading advocates of
stringent gun
control. The group, which promotes gun-control activism
among the nation's
mothers, says it is "dedicated to preventing gun death and
injury and
supporting victims and survivors of gun trauma."

Specifically, the organization promotes nationwide gun
registration and
wants to "close gun show loopholes." Also, it supports a
"one gun purchase
a month" program, and "strict oversight of the gun
industry," among other
measures.

Officials with the group, which has its main office in San
Francisco
General Hospital, did not return phone calls on Friday
seeking comments
about Graham's involvement with the Mother's Day speech or
her conviction.

According to the Post, jurors last week returned guilty
verdicts on nine
counts against Graham, 49, for her Jan. 26, 2000, shooting
of Kikko Smith,
age 23. The shooting has left Smith paralyzed and confined
to a wheelchair
for life.

Smith has spent most of the past year in a hospital, said
the Post account.

Witnesses said Graham, who has three living children and who
was distraught
over the loss of her son and frustrated with police efforts
to catch her
son's killer, went to Smith's house with her son's .45-cal.
handgun and
30-year-old Erskine Moorer, the boyfriend of one of Graham's
daughters.

When they arrived at about 6 p.m., Graham twice asked
Smith -- who had been
called outside by friends and was talking to them as they
sat in their car
-- his name.

Prosecutors said Graham and Moorer then pulled out guns and
began shooting
at Smith as he ran from them. However, the Post said,
Moorer's attorney,
Douglas Wood, told the jury that his client had left the
neighborhood
before the shooting.

"Asked who confronted him with a gun, Smith pointed
emphatically to Graham,
who sat still and somber. At another point, he pointed
firmly at Moorer,
saying Moorer joined the ambush as he ran from Graham," the
paper said.

Prosecutors said during the trial that Graham likely
confused Smith with
another young man with a similar-sounding name, and that
Smith was not the
one who shot her son in 1999.

"Prosecutors suggested that the grieving mother probably
misunderstood
Smith, thinking he said the name 'Teacco,' a young man she
blamed -- also
mistakenly, prosecutors say -- for her son's slaying," said
the Post.

One bullet fired by Graham is still lodged in Smith's spine.
He told jurors
during testimony that doctors say he will likely never walk
again.

"From a mother to a mother, she knew better," said Smith's
mother, Mary Ann
Smith, after jurors reached their decision. "You can't tell
the kids to
stop the violence with the mothers running around like
this."

Graham faces 15 years to life in prison for three of the
most serious
charges against her. She will be sentenced March 29, the
paper said.

According to information published by MMM, in 1998 a total
of 30,708 people
were killed by guns in the U.S. Of those, 17,424 were gun
suicides, 12,102
were gun homicides, 886 were unintentional or accidental
shootings, and 316
were shooting deaths of undetermined intent, the group said.

Meanwhile, the Second Amendment Sisters, a pro-gun rights
organization that
also caters to women, says more gun laws and restrictions
are "anti-self
defense" and actually serve to put more women at risk of
violence and
injury.

Also, the SAS said federal crime statistics show that twice
as many
children die each year from non-gun homicide, and that eight
times as many
children die from non-gun violence, indicating that "the
problem is
violence, not guns."

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These 

[CTRL] Democrats Expose Themselves

2001-02-06 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Democrats Expose Themselves
Linda Bowles
Feb. 6, 2001

The horrendous fight over the nomination of John Ashcroft to become attorney
general of the United States was a good thing. It was an important victory
over the forces of radical liberalism. It exposed ruptures and fault lines in
the ranks of the Democrat Party. And it demonstrated that Senate Minority
Leader Tom Daschle no longer has the iron-fisted control that he exercised
time and again during the last eight years. The vote was 58 for Ashcroft and
42 against.
As is their wont, the Democrat leaders declared victory after losing. They
claimed they had achieved everything they wanted in the nomination fight.
They said their opposition was a "shot across the bow" to keep Ashcroft
"honest" and to warn President Bush what would happen if he dared to nominate
a conservative judge to the Supreme Court.

These assertions are rationalizations. In the first place, Ashcroft is
already "honest." That is one of the problems they have with him. And
President Bush already has the 51 votes he needs to confirm his choices for
the Supreme Court. Democrat threats of a filibuster are hollow. They will not
want to run the risk of being seen as partisan obstructionists.

The Democrats did not fire shots to deliver a warning; they fired shots to
sink the ship. They wanted to destroy Ashcroft just as they destroyed Judge
Robert Bork.

The inflammatory lies and innuendoes Ted Kennedy used against Ashcroft are
echoes of his infamous accusations against Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork.
His words against Bork ushered in a new era of McCarthyism. They are worth
repeating for their historic value and to provide insight into how liberals
execute the politics of personal destruction.

On the Senate floor in 1987, Edward Kennedy said, "Robert Bork's America is a
land in which women would be forced into back-alley abortions, blacks would
sit at segregated lunch counters, rogue police could break down citizen's
doors in midnight raids, schoolchildren could not be taught about evolution,
writers and artists would be censored at the whim of government, and the
doors of the Federal courts would be shut on the fingers of millions of
citizens for whom the judiciary is often the only protector of the individual
rights that are the heart of our democracy."

But this time, the scurrilous demagoguery of guilt by association, the mass
protests, the lies and the manipulation did not carry the day. The best
efforts of the paid character assassins and the Democrat nightriders did not
prevail. This time it didn't work.

Perhaps the greatest value of the confirmation brawl was that it brought into
clear view that a majority of Democrat senators are, when the chips are down,
little more than puppets of special interest groups organized around
left-wing zealotry.

Who are the puppeteers pulling the strings? We now have a list. On Jan. 30,
2001, Mark Levin, president of the Landmark Legal Foundation, sent a letter
to Sen. Patrick Leahy with questions about the closed meeting between
Democrat Senate staffers and a group of "over 200 national organizations
opposed to the nomination of former Senator John Ashcroft for attorney
general of the United States."

Levin noted, "Among other things, the group established a lobbying
committee." According to Federal law, organizations that receive federal
funds are prohibited from lobbying activity. Nevertheless, at least 18 of the
organizations present at this anti-Ashcroft meeting received more than $150
million in federal funds over a four year period from 1996 through 1999.

Among these 18 organizations are some familiar ones, including the American
Bar Association, American Federation of State, County, and Municipal
Employees, National Association for the Advancement of Colored People,
National Council of Jewish Women, National Education Association, NOW Legal
Defense and Education Fund, Planned Parenthood and the Sierra Club. Levin
asked Sen. Leahy "whether these non-profit organizations, with your
encouragement, are using tax-exempt funds or federal funds to lobby
senators." Levin sent copies of his letter, with exhibits, to the Internal
Revenue Service, the Tax Division of the United States Justice Department and
the Senate Select Committee on Ethics.

It has now been made perfectly and irrefutably clear that what these
organizations have against Ashcroft is not that he is a religious man, but
that he takes his religion seriously. They do not fear him because he will
not defend the Constitution, but because he will; they do not fear him
because he will not scrupulously enforce the law, but because he will; and
they do not fear him because he has flexible and accommodating moral values,
but because he does not.






*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use

[CTRL] The Rich pardon

2001-02-06 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!


--

--

--

--
The Rich pardon

--

--


 2001 WorldNetDaily.com


Some people in Congress are shocked -- shocked, I tell you -- to find out
that money may have been buying personal favors in the Clinton White House.

Therefore, Congress is set to hold investigative hearings this week into the
possibility of Clinton administration corruption.

I know what you are thinking. Where were these guys when we needed them?
Well, it gets worse.

The hearings to be held in the House and Senate are to focus on Clinton's
11th-hour pardon of fugitive commodities trader Marc Rich.

There's no doubt Rich is a scoundrel. He fled the country and renounced his
citizenship when faced with a 65-count indictment for conspiracy, tax evasion
and trading with the enemy. He was convicted in absentia on 51 counts.

It also appears obvious that Clinton pardoned Rich as a quid pro quo for
hundreds of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions funneled to
Hillary Clinton, Al Gore and other Democratic Party candidates.

I suppose I should be thankful that some members of Congress have awakened
finally to the depths of blatant Clinton administration corruption. But I
can't help feeling that these inquiries are way too little, way too late.

Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., is leading one of the probes. Think about that
irony. Specter bent over backwards, citing Scottish law, in his intellectual
and legal gymnastics attempting to explain why he was voting against
convicting Clinton during the impeachment trial.

His vote came after his wife got an appointment to the Clinton
administration. And he's going to judge whether Clinton took a bribe to
pardon Rich?

Many of us out here in America -- outside of Washington, D.C. -- couldn't
understand why the Congress failed to investigate Clinton administration
corruption adequately during the last eight years. It was as if Congress had
abdicated its oversight role and forgotten that it represented, at least, a
co-equal branch of government with the executive -- and, more importantly,
the people's voice in the federal system.

It seems like odd timing to begin worrying about Clinton now that he's gone.

And bribery will be a tough case to make -- no matter how obvious it appears
to any of us. If Congress couldn't convict Clinton on perjury during
impeachment, does anyone really expect anything but some hot air from these
hearings?

Furthermore, as much as I hate to say it, the Constitution does give the
president wide berth on the issue of pardons. There's no need for approval by
Congress or anyone else.

You see, Congress had its chance. Most members -- even in the Senate -- knew
what Clinton was when they voted on impeachment. They knew he was corrupt.
They knew he was a criminal. They knew he had repeatedly broken the public
trust. They knew he had no respect for the law. They knew he believed only in
himself and what was good for Bill Clinton. They knew he had no scruples, no
conscience, no ethics, no morality. They knew if he got away with perjury and
much more serious crimes for which he wasn't impeached, that he would
continue his criminal escapades.

Well, guess what? Clinton did just that. And the Rich pardon was only the
latest insult added to many injuries Bill Clinton inflicted on America's body
politic.

I wish Congress well in investigating the Rich affair. The American public
does deserve to know the truth. The problem is that Congress has been
woefully ineffective in such half-hearted investigations during the Clinton
years. So, my hopes that justice will be served and that the public will be
informed are somewhat dim, to say the least.

I'm just trying to figure out where all this outrage is coming from at this
late date. Where was the outrage when Clinton was selling national security
down the drain for Chinese political campaign contributions? Don't they get
it? After eight years, don't these people understand Clinton would sell
anything that wasn't nailed down to anyone with money in his hand?

Like any other red-blooded American, I'd like to see Marc Rich pay for his
crimes. But that's not going to happen. More importantly, I'd like to see
Bill Clinton -- and all those around him who were complicit in their guilt --
pay for the pattern of official criminal activity of the last eight years.

Too bad, but I just don't think Congress has the stomach for it.





*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes 

[CTRL] Schwarzenegger Pondering Bid for Calif. Governor

2001-02-06 Thread Bill Richer

-Caveat Lector-

WJPBR Email News List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peace at any cost is a Prelude to War!

Schwarzenegger Pondering Bid for Calif. Governor


LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - If Calif. Gov. Gray Davis (news - web sites) can't
solve the state's electricity crisis, actor Arnold Schwarzenegger may want to
step in and terminate his political career.

The action hero didn't quite use the ``T'' word in a phone conversation with
Los Angeles Times political columnist George Skelton, published on Monday,
but his intent seemed clear.

Skelton said that a recent column he wrote about Davis' reelection prospects
following criticism of his leadership in the state's energy crisis got
Schwarzenegger so excited that he called last week from the set of his latest
movie.

Schwarzenegger, a Republican, told Skelton that more decisive leadership was
needed in California. ``It comes down to leadership. You have to take risks
and be able to just say, 'I've taken my best shot.' And that is what is
lacking,'' Schwarzenegger said.

``It's upsetting to everyone right now ... People are taking their companies
out of state because they're worried (about electricity) ... And then someone
cannot make up their mind what they really want to do ... You cannot make
great decisions if you're just worried about your reelection.''

Schwarzenegger added that if Davis couldn't turn things around he could see
himself following in the footsteps of former President Ronald Reagan (news -
web sites) who left a film acting career for politics when he was elected
Governor of California in 1966. Unlike Reagan, who went on to become U.S.
president in 1980, Austrian-born Schwarzenegger could never become president
because the post is open only to American born citizens.

``I saw in the last 10 years that I'm getting much more pleasure out of
(helping people) than making money and making movies. And it's increasing my
desire to do that. It can lead -- and will lead, probably -- to some
political office. I haven't really said this is the time. But, you know, the
bottom line is if Davis goes on the way he is -- then eventually there will
be a vacuum in a year and I could ...,'' Schwarzenegger told Skelton.

Davis last Thursday signed a bill allowing the state to buy electricity on
long-term contracts at prices far lower than what the state's investor-owned
utilities have been paying on the spot market and more measures to deal with
the crisis are expected this week.

Schwarzenegger said that he had thought many times about running for office.
``I've thought about it many times because I love politics,'' Schwarzenegger
said. ``I get such great satisfaction out of helping people.''

``I just leave it open,'' Schwarzenegger added. ``If he (Davis) doesn't keep
his promises on all those issues -- energy, environment, schools, health care
-- then you've got to say, OK, there's room for someone else.''

Schwarzenegger said he had movie obligations through 2004, ''But I would
sacrifice my, you know, $20 million a picture and all those things and forget
about that to step in.''

Schwarzenegger said he would not take campaign money from special interests.
He's wealthy enough to finance his own campaign.




*COPYRIGHT NOTICE** In accordance with Title 17 U. S. C. Section 107,
any copyrighted work in this message is distributed under fair use
without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest
in receiving the included information for nonprofit research and educational
purposes only.[Ref. http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml ]

Want to be on our lists?  Write at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a menu of our lists!

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om



[CTRL] End of the Beginning

2001-02-06 Thread Euphorix

-Caveat Lector-

From
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/World/Middle_East/2001-02/fisk060201.shtml

}}Beginning of the end of the article
With power, of course, comes respect. CNN now calls Sharon "a barrel-framed veteran
general who has built a reputation for flattening obstacles  and reshaping Israel's
landscape", while the BBC World Service on Sunday managed to avoid the fateful words
Sabra and Chatila by referring only to his "chequered military career". As for Nadia
Salameh, "Sharon's role here shows what he is capable of. If Sharon is elected, the
whole peace process falls by the wayside because he doesn't want peace." It's a
relief to recall that up to a million Israelis demonstrated their moral integrity in
1982 by protesting in Tel Aviv against the massacre. And equally chilling to reflect
that some of those one million – if the polls are accurate – may well be voting for
Mr Sharon today.

End of the ending{{
AER
Forwarded as information only; no endorsement to be presumed
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material
is distributed without charge or profit to those who have
expressed a prior interest in receiving this type of information
for non-profit research and educational purposes only.
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
Integrity has no need of rules. -Albert Camus (1913-1960)
+ + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + +
The only real voyage of discovery consists not in seeking
new landscapes but in having new eyes. -Marcel Proust

The libertarian therefore considers one of his prime educational
tasks is to spread the demystification and desanctification of the
State among its hapless subjects.  His task is to demonstrate
repeatedly and in depth that not only the emperor but even the
"democratic" State has no clothes; that all governments subsist
by exploitive rule over the public; and that such rule is the reverse
of objective necessity.  He strives to show that the existence of
taxation and the State necessarily sets up a class division between
the exploiting rulers and the exploited ruled.  He seeks to show that
the task of the court intellectuals who have always supported the State
has ever been to weave mystification in order to induce the public to
accept State rule and that these intellectuals obtain, in return, a
share in the power and pelf extracted by the rulers from their deluded
subjects.
[[For a New Liberty:  The Libertarian Manifesto, Murray N. Rothbard,
Fox  Wilkes, 1973, 1978, p. 25]]

A HREF="http://www.ctrl.org/"www.ctrl.org/A
DECLARATION  DISCLAIMER
==
CTRL is a discussion  informational exchange list. Proselytizing propagandic
screeds are unwelcomed. Substance—not soap-boxing—please!  These are
sordid matters and 'conspiracy theory'—with its many half-truths, mis-
directions and outright frauds—is used politically by different groups with
major and minor effects spread throughout the spectrum of time and thought.
That being said, CTRLgives no endorsement to the validity of posts, and
always suggests to readers; be wary of what you read. CTRL gives no
credence to Holocaust denial and nazi's need not apply.

Let us please be civil and as always, Caveat Lector.

Archives Available at:
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html
 A HREF="http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/ctrl.html"Archives of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/A

http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/
 A HREF="http:[EMAIL PROTECTED]/"ctrl/A

To subscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SUBSCRIBE CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To UNsubscribe to Conspiracy Theory Research List[CTRL] send email:
SIGNOFF CTRL [to:] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Om