ail.com>
> Copyright 2015 Wookey <woo...@wookware.org>
> Copyright 2016 Gianfranco Costamagna <costamagnagianfra...@yahoo.it>
> Copyright 2016 Gianfranco Costamagna <locutusofb...@debian.org>
> Copyright 2016 Jeremy Bicha <jbi...@linux.com>
> Copyr
not be uploaded to unstable.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga...@ubuntu.com
On Fri, Nov 02, 2012 at 11:11:13AM -0300, gustavo panizzo gfa wrote:
updated package can be found at
http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/o/openldap/openldap_2.4.31-1.1.dsc
This is not the correct procedure for an NMU. Please send a debdiff to the
bug report.
--
Steve Langasek
that need the conversion
install and configure these packages by hand.
That would be my recommendation.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developer
, or upgrading the
package manager before the dist-upgrade.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
Ubuntu Developerhttp://www.debian.org/
slanga
to a symlink for
backwards-compatibility. But yeah, it seems dpkg-shlibdeps doesn't work
with this database layout; I don't know why.
This issue will go away on the next upload of dpkg to Ubuntu (which, as you
know, is currently waiting for confirmation of the final multiarch db
layout).
--
Steve
On Sun, Dec 13, 2009 at 12:04:17AM -0600, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
I am wondering what to do next: should I pursue a 14-day delayed NMU?
Do nothing and hope some of my changes are picked up?
An unsanctioned NMU of a new upstream version of a Priority: required
package? No.
--
Steve Langasek
packages; I'm just pointing out why adding | php4 for new
packages isn't necessarily a good answer.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
it as a fatal error, if key files go missing. That won't
directly answer the question of why the package in the archive is wrong, but
it will make the task of tracking down the bug in your sponsor's devel
environment a bit easier.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 03:07:23PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 02:47:41PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 07:12:47PM +0200, Gregory Colpart wrote:
On Thu, Jul 19, 2007 at 06:06:14PM -0500, Raphael Geissert wrote:
That's exactly the reason
makes it not particularly relevant to newly-packaged software. In
fact, you can pretty much drop the 'php4' alternative altogether now, since
php5 was in etch and php4 won't be in lenny.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
recommend to Depend on php5.
$ apt-cache show php5 | grep Depends
Depends: libapache2-mod-php5 (= 5.2.3-1) | php5-cgi (= 5.2.3-1),
php5-common (= 5.2.3-1)
That's more than enough.
That doesn't address the incorrect dependency on the *webserver*, which is
what Nacho was pointing out.
--
Steve
to it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
here, I couldn't care less if
you credit me for this change. :)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
-rfakeroot' is a double-invocation of fakeroot
which may fail altogether.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
hold off on uploading
this package for a couple of days, to let the remaining architectures catch
up (the binaries are already built on the autobuilders, and just need to be
uploaded propagated).
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 10:46:16AM +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
Il giorno sab, 02/06/2007 alle 17.43 -0700, Steve Langasek ha scritto:
On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 01:59:38AM +0200, Francesco Namuri wrote:
I am looking for a sponsor for my package ntfs-config.
Package name: ntfs
packages only about a quarter of the time, and I
don't think xpm is so heavy that we should be concerned about the size
impact on users' machines.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
is pointless, but it's
equally pointless to link against libraries you know you won't use. :)
Anyway, building against libgd2-noxpm-dev will get you a proper dependency
that will be satisfied by either the xpm or the noxpm version of libgd.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long
is this something that needs an entire package to itself?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
still make a *huge* difference in the quality of the
user's experience.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
in that regard.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
point in trying to upload this right now, when the package's
build dependencies (aolserver4) aren't installable on the buildds?
http://buildd.debian.org/fetch.cgi?pkg=aolserver4-nsimaparch=alphaver=3.1-3%2Bb1stamp=1178149073
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free
this bug can be closed rather
than reassigned.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
(for the
moment) supports 32-bit sparcs too, building your binaries as 64-bit has the
one advantage that this would pick up a dependency on libc6-sparc64 to make
it clear to sparc users that it's not suitable for 32-bit machines.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
On Tue, May 08, 2007 at 12:35:24PM -0700, John Stamp wrote:
On Monday 07 May 2007, Steve Langasek wrote:
- have both packages depend on a common file providing the schema
file (a bit heavy of a solution for a single schema file..)
What if I split lastfm into 'lastfm' and 'lastfm-gconf
for a single schema file..)
- use alternatives or a diversion to decide which package's schema file will
be available under the named location (only appropriate if the two
packages have identical schema file contents)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
than nanoweb.
Maybe you missed the php-qt ITP then?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 06:26:01PM +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
On Sunday 6 May 2007 17:43, David Paleino wrote:
Now, as Steve Langasek pointed out in that bug report:
PHP is GPL-incompatible. You cannot distribute GPL software together with
GPL-incompatible software that it depends
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 04:55:58PM -0500, Raphael wrote:
On 06/05/07, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 06, 2007 at 05:40:37PM +0100, Neil Williams wrote:
If Ubuntu want nanoweb they are welcome to it. I see no reason to haul
this excuse of a package into Debian. I write
this function?
libpam.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED
been uploaded to a public keyserver, you can remove the UID.
Right.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
to this?
Ask upstream to provide a cleaner tarball for next time? You could reroll
the upstream tarball with a distinguishing Debian version number, but I
don't think it's worth it at all for this.
But that's why this is a warning, not an error.
--
Steve Langasek Give me
have never seen
dh_pycentral set these permissions on directories, so the permissions
probably come from the upstream install rules. Are you calling dh_fixperms
from your debian/rules?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 12:03:03PM +0100, Jan Hauke Rahm wrote:
Steve Langasek wrote:
FWIW, you're likely to get better feedback if you help make it easier for
people to see the problem you're having. What is the debconf error that you
get? What is the postinst code that's failing? (I've
any obvious errors in it...)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL
On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 01:10:01PM +, Ben Hutchings wrote:
On Wed, 2007-03-14 at 17:31 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 08:23:46PM -0400, Muammar Wadih El Khatib Rodriguez
wrote:
I uploaded a new upstream version of a package which is called CEGUI
(I did it two
I proceed? I mean, should I
upload the previous version of cegui to unstable? or what is the
correct procedure to handle that kind of problem?
Is there any reason that getting the maintainer of ogre to upload a newer
upstream version of that package is not the correct answer here?
--
Steve
in /usr/lib/$PACKAGE, of course.
No, you should *not* put libraries into subdirectories of /usr/lib
unnecessarily.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 07:36:13PM -0500, Justin Pryzby wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 12:48:21PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 02:10:06PM -, Paul Cager wrote:
On Mon, February 19, 2007 1:38 pm, Sam Morris wrote:
I am packaging the nemiver debugger, which has
the fact,whereas a datestamp is.
Uh? Is rollback (in the sense of undoing a commit) possible with SVN
without manually fiddling in the repository at all?
Sure, svn merge.
That doesn't undo a commit in the sense he means, it just lets you reverse a
commit with a later one.
--
Steve Langasek
, instead of any.
But wouldn't it be fine to just drop this binary package on all archs? I
seem to remember that liferea-gtkhtml has had other problems on all archs in
the past, and that the -xulrunner variant was recommended?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
it
an empty package depending on liferea-xulrunner, rather than to risk getting
package relationships wrong when merging the contents. Please go for one of
those first options.
Thanks,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set
explizitly knowing about the needed libattr1-dev build-dep?
proftpd build-depends on libacl1-dev, which depends on libattr1-dev.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
as part of the
library's ABI and have never been included in the published API.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
, and no one noticed except the LSB folks, who were using
dlopen() to try to check the ABI...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the .so is a relatively new innovation that
hasn't been adopted too widely outside of certain circles (such as GNOME).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
system, yes. (We have removed individual packages from Essential, because
their functionality was moved to a different package due to
renames/splits/merges.)
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
that can and should be addressed individually. --as-needed will
always get the answer wrong in certain cases, because it's a heuristic.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
think that requiring a statement telling recipients where to get the
original work is onerous or non-free, but it's the only thing that stands
out, so I figured I'd point it out anyway.
BTW, requests for license review should be sent to debian-legal, not to
debian-mentors...
--
Steve Langasek
at once.
Anyway, cleared for arm and sparc now.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
this.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
, and as a result give us a $TEXDIR/babel.sty file that we're assured
of being the copy from thailatex.
- By avoiding any use of the preinst, we also avoid any rollback
requirements.
Completely untested in real-world conditions, let me know if you find I've
screwed something up :)
--
Steve Langasek
On Fri, Oct 13, 2006 at 04:13:07AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
On Tue, 12 Sep 2006 15:11:23 -0700 Steve Langasek wrote:
The documentation for this probably belongs in debian-policy; current
versions of policy seem to mention Source-Version, though, not the new
substvars, and I'm not sure
including that source will be important
to you as the maintainer or to users wishing to modify/reuse the package.
Děkuju,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
to use in packages
for adding your own sections to php.ini.
I wasn't aware that php5 now had a --with-config-file-scan-dir option.
Please file a bug against php5 requesting its inclusion.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
script code shared by PHP extensions) for adding and removing extensions to
php.ini, but that's it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
the lintian error?
The error is, if you don't *need* a specific version of the package, you
shouldn't depend on it at /all/. Essential means it's always available, so
there's no reason for you to depend on it.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian
Source-Version, and I would encourage you to use the new
binary:Version variable instead.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Fri, Sep 15, 2006 at 09:47:34AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Thu, 14 Sep 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
The BIG problem is how to get the next-version. Say you have version
1.2-3. A binNMU would be 1.2-3+b1, a security release would be
1.2-3etch1 (unless
On Thu, Sep 14, 2006 at 12:55:47PM +0200, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If you want to declare a strict versioned dependency from an arch: all
package to an arch: any package... don't do that, because it will break
under binNMUs. :)
I only know
it will break
under binNMUs. :)
The documentation for this probably belongs in debian-policy; current
versions of policy seem to mention Source-Version, though, not the new
substvars, and I'm not sure if anyone has submitted a patch for this?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough
packages can't be versioned, so
your libldap2.2 doesn't satisfy the dependency.
Besides which, having a libldap package from OpenLDAP 2.2 claim to provide
libldap2 is broken in the extreme.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
for
comaintenance in a reasonable timeframe. What if I want to hijack the package
in favour of a better maintenance ?
In that case, please consult the QA team for advice (and for formal MIA
tracking).
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
. NMUs should always be limited
to fixing bugs -- not making decisions that are exclusively the maintainer's
to make, like accepting comaintainers...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move
chroot if the intent is to
upload to unstable.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE
to not use dpatch and use quilt instead.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email
.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject
this.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
, forcing apt (aptitude or apt-get) to find a
solution that lets you keep them all.
This is definitely off-topic for -mentors, though; if you need further help,
please see debian-user.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
is a broken
one, because responsibility for the NMU lies with the uploader, not with the
sponsoree.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:04:00PM -0700, Don Armstrong wrote:
On Tue, 30 May 2006, Bart Martens wrote:
On Tue, May 30, 2006 at 12:03:19PM -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
There are no technical measures in place which *prohibit*
developers from sponsoring NMUs. Nevertheless, the concept
Debian developers we have that are reticent to
communicate with the project in the English language are in the bottom .1%
of the population?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
On Mon, May 01, 2006 at 03:04:29PM +0200, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 08:33:49PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
Goswin von Brederlow [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mv -f Makefile Makefile.bak
imake -DUseInstalled -I/usr/lib/X11/config
this is a binNMU...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
-stamp] Error 1
This looks like you have the wrong version of xutils-dev.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 05:38:22AM +, Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2006-04-26, Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what does update-alternatives --list x-cursor-theme list in this case?
It shows nothing.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/# update-alternatives --list x-cursor-theme
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Sun, Apr 23, 2006 at 06:33:04PM -0500, Joe Wreschnig wrote:
On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:51 -0700, Steve Langasek wrote:
If it's not supposed to be a public module, it shouldn't be in a public
directory, and then there's no reason to provide more packages than just the
application package
-alternatives --list x-cursor-theme list in this case?
It really looks to me like a u-a bug, not a bug in the calling maintainer
script.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL
the
binary.
You want objdump -p binary | grep NEEDED instead.
But it was established a few weeks ago that linda's check used ldd by
mistake, and I haven't heard that it's been fixed yet.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
.
Is there a nice solution for this? I guess the right thing should be to tell
upstream to unify the libraries into one, is there any other solution I can
handle?
Unifying the libs is the only way to do this cleanly, AFAIK.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
On Fri, Mar 31, 2006 at 08:41:22AM +0200, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
--- Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
This is discussed in policy 10.2. If your libraries are failing to link
when using -z,defs, that's a bug in those libraries; anything that
references symbols from other libraries
to link against
those libraries.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
. Since the name
of this library is etl, the name would be etl-dev. Can anyone clarify?
The name etl-dev is fine. Prepending lib when there's nothing here
named libetl is pointless.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
that this means
splitting the source package, since you can't build binaries for both main
and non-free from the same source. The driver itself sounds like it's
perfectly suitable for main, only the optional firmware would need to be in
non-free.
Cheers,
--
Steve Langasek Give me
On Wed, Feb 15, 2006 at 07:47:11PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 02:19:08PM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 07:06:00PM +0100, Mattia Dongili wrote:
I need a quick suggestion how to handle libcpufreq{0,-dev} within the
libsysfs transition
understand why
it cannot be run with python2.4 then. I hope someone finds a better solution
anyway :)
Yeah, we've been working on it... discussion on debian-python over the past
month or two.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer
,
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
:
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=texlive-bin
nothing mentions this bug!
Is the reason for this that the texlive packages are in experimental and
not in unstable?
Yes. Since the package is not in unstable, it's not in the source-binary
map used by bugs.d.o.
--
Steve
that it's unmodified.
Well, really, I think the right thing is for *dpkg* to remove it if it can
determine that it's unmodified; this is bug #330256.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world
users to download install it as a
build-dependency. shrug
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
while DAK still sets it instead
of doing a proper job of issuing notfound commands to the BTS.
You mean close commands...
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 10:00:01AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Steve Langasek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 09:29:35AM -0200, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 18 Jan 2006, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote:
In a more general sense, it's important to note
modifying the configure.in?
You don't. How about just forwarding it upstream instead?
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http
-maintainer or otherwise. A DD will have to upload the fix in question.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:55:27PM +0100, Frank Küster wrote:
Steve Langasek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jan 17, 2006 at 01:03:32PM +0100, Bjoern Boschman wrote:
I'd like to close on of the xlibs-dev bugs, but I've never done an NMU
before.
This is because NMU stands for non
to be clear, relibtoolizing should only need to be a one-time thing.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org
, since it has a similar RC bug.
--
Steve Langasek Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer to set it on, and I can move the world.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.debian.org/
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 03:19:00AM -0800, Steve Langasek wrote:
Already uploaded kball, actually; you should've received some email about
that by now. Looks like bug #345244 wasn't closed in the changelog, though,
so I'll go close it by hand. Also, you might want to fix the broken
debian
1 - 100 of 546 matches
Mail list logo
