RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-15 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 10:23 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Message tracking won't tell me what specific email in an exchange email box is the one I am interested in. Maybe I'm not explaining

[Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I am hoping the people here can help me. It's not Declude specific, but I consider the experts here as the most knowledgeable on SMTP and Email. I am looking for a script/utility to pull the header information out of every email in an Outlook/Exchange inbox. I want to be able to pull the sending

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
be used to do it. Darin. - Original Message - From: IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 5:45 PM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... I am hoping the people here can help me. It's not Declude specific

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util...

2007-05-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
. - Original Message - From: IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 6:13 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Header Information Util... Because the emails I have left are from a range of times/dates, and they're on an Exchange

[Declude.JunkMail] Spam reduction ?

2007-05-04 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Anyone else seeing a major reduction is spam the past week ? I usually see about 14-15k messages daily, but since Monday have dropped off to about 8k... Did the recent arrests and law suits have a result this early ? Karl Drugge B.S.I.T., A.S., M.C.S.E. ( NT 4.0, 2000, 2003 ), M.C.S.A. (

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Vulnerability in RPC on Windows DNS Server Could Allow Remote Code Execution

2007-04-13 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
This shouldn't be an issue for most of us. My DMZ boxes are already as hardened as I can get them, with the firewall ( ingress and egress ), patches, and IP filtering. I would think that most ISP's and corporate networks would be using the same techniques. We gave up relying on M$ and other vendor

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question

2007-03-22 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
: IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\) [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, March 21, 2007 9:35 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question Oh well, didn't think there was. I just wanted to get a statistical sampling of what I was deleting. Karl

[Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question

2007-03-21 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I am trying to get some stats off of my Declude. It would help if I could set Declude to send me every fifth, or tenth, or one hundredth email that I have set to delete, or route-to. Is there a way to do this ? Karl Drugge --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question

2007-03-21 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filtering question Hi Karl, Unfortunately not, we don't count emails other than in the console.txt file David -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Wednesday, March 21

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today

2007-02-07 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Those are not the only DNS attacks... TWC had one as well, I believe. One of their servers was knocked off the net two days ago. I was monitoring my DNS changes at network solutions, waiting for propagation and I kept getting random packet loss on it. Karl Drugge -Original

[Declude.JunkMail] SPAM reductions ?

2007-01-31 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Anyone seeing a reduction in incoming SPAM ? I've been looking at my morning reports, and my incoming mail is off by 30 percent or so for the past two weeks. Typically, I'll see 12-15k messages a day, but lately it's been 9-12k. I can't believe I'm the only lucky one... Karl Drugge

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPAM reductions ?

2007-01-31 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
at twtelecom.net ? Andrew. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2007 5:23 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject

[Declude.JunkMail] 20+ percent jump in SPAM

2007-01-16 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Guess they got the issues fixed in Asia that was keeping the spammers offline Karl Drugge --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at

[Declude.JunkMail] Anyone know of a tool....

2007-01-10 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Looking for a tool that works with Outlook/Exchange.. I'd like to be able to pull all the header info out of any messages in a particular folder.. like last-hop IP, domain name, that kind of stuff. Once a week, I copy all messages sent/rev'd in the past few days into a sort folder, and then

Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-18 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
EXACTLY why we have the city attorney and another legal specialist helping to formulate our own new policy. Best to invest some real $$$ now, before we get sued for our ignorance ( and ) later. Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-18 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
applicability to your own needs. Your needs are governed by Florida's Government-in-the-Sunshine laws which allow for public inspection of most records. Matt IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) wrote: EXACTLY why we have the city attorney and another legal specialist helping to formulate our own new

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] OT: Message Storage

2006-12-18 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
in question. . . Lots of good stuff . . . Matt IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) wrote: True, I'm covered by different laws.. But in regards to keeping 'legal', in all senses of the word, especially when you are discussing 'home grown' versus 'off the shelf

[Declude.JunkMail] List up ?

2006-12-13 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
List up ? Nothing in a day or so Karl Drugge --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- This E-mail

[Declude.JunkMail] blklst ON statistics...

2006-12-12 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Interesting.. I ran some scripts against the blklst.txt file, and it shows I am already blocking the most active connections. About the only thing I can really see, is that the SPAM is coming from hundreds of IP's, with only a few from each one. I was kind of shocked by the extent of it, figuring

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Reporting Tool

2006-12-12 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Posted At: Monday, December 11, 2006 4:33 PM Posted To: Lists - Declude JunkMail Conversation: [Declude.JunkMail] New Reporting Tool Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blklst ON

2006-12-11 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
This keeps track of all emails processed ? Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 5:12 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] blklst ON I must have

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] New Reporting Tool

2006-12-11 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
. From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Posted At: Thursday, December 07, 2006 1:53 PM Posted To: Lists - Declude JunkMail Conversation: New Reporting Tool Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] New Reporting Tool The newest PERL script

[Declude.JunkMail] New Reporting Tool

2006-12-07 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
The newest PERL script. Slices, dices, etc ... Throw it in a directory, edit a few environment variables at the top of the script, dump in a few Declude logs, run it, enjoy. Requires PERL, of course. Added two command line switches : 'day' and 'week' . Day does the previous day, week does

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Undocumented Directive 4.x

2006-12-05 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Undocumented Directive 4.x Mmm maybe I had them put it in a bit later. I think it is definitely in 4.3.14 ... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006 2:11

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Undocumented Directive 4.x

2006-12-04 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Running v4.3.7 for SmarterMail, and I don't have any blklst.txt file anywhere on my disk Do I need to upgrade to a newer version ? Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Barker Sent: Monday, December 04, 2006

FW: [Declude.JunkMail] Results ! 92.9 percent delete rate...

2006-11-09 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 3:45 PM To: IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results ! 92.9 percent delete rate... Importance: High Hi Karl, I have to ask Off List and hope you don't mind. Would you consider selling me a copy or a license

[Declude.JunkMail] SmarterMail Problem...

2006-11-06 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Wow ! FUN weekend ! Internal Exchange server lost two drives simultaneously on a RAID 5 stripe early Friday... Then on rebuild started dropping random drives. Needless to say, Dell backplanes are a little hard to come by on a weekend. Anyway, after we get the Exchange box back Saturday, it turns

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Results ! 92.9 percent delete rate...

2006-11-02 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Hi, Where did you get the declude log reader from? Kindest Regards Craig Edmonds 123 Marbella Internet W: www.123marbella.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2006 7:13 PM

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Analyzing junkmail log files

2006-09-21 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I did DL a copy some time ago, and it didn't really fit my needs, hence writing my own. Not to say DLAnalyzer isn't a good product, but for the 4 or 5 things I need done on a regular basis, mine works better for me and my site. If I was running multiple servers, or needed some of the advanced

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Analyzing junkmail log files

2006-09-20 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I've been using my own, written in VB.net . Quick and dirty, but it gets the job done. Been thinking of porting it to run under a web page and selling it for cheap if there was an interest. Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Way to filter bogus FRMOM domains ?

2006-09-19 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
. Darrell --- Check out http://www.invariantsystems.com for utilities for Declude, Imail, mxGuard, and ORF. IMail/Declude Overflow Queue Monitoring, SURBL/URI integration, MRTG Integration, and Log Parsers. IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) writes

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Spike

2006-09-19 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Getting pelted here... Mostly from cinci.rr.com... Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Fisher Sent: Tuesday, September 19, 2006 2:29 PM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Spike

[Declude.JunkMail] Way to filter bogus FRMOM domains ?

2006-09-18 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I've been trying to filter some SPAM that is using a false FROM domain. Stuff is coming from overseas ( spammachine.spamsite.spammer.pl [99.99.99.99] ), but is using a false from domain, such as ( [EMAIL PROTECTED] ). This stuff would fail, except DECLUDE shows it as coming from a .edu, and

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Max whitelists hit

2006-07-28 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Maybe you dont really want to whitelist What we do here is use a FROMFILE, and assign a large negative point value to all domains or individuals on that list. We still suffer with forged return addresses, but thats fairly minimal. It tends to work a little bit better then

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] 4.3 Upgrade

2006-07-24 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
John, I had some of the same issues, and cured all leakage by disabling Hi-Jack. Give it a shot. Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Doyle Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 1:05 PM To:

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Over Hold Weight, but Delivered

2006-07-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I've been seeing it too. I finally tracked it down to Hi-Jack. Disable Hi-Jack, and you should be good ( I just renamed the config file, so I can restart it as soon as this is fixed ). Somehow, Hi-jack grabs the message before Declude kills it. Karl Drugge -Original Message-

[Declude.JunkMail] Number of times per test

2006-07-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I looked through the manual, but didn't see this defined... I want a test that applies 10 points if a certain string appears in the body of a message a number of times... So if, for example, 'replikas' appears 5 times, and I want to apply ten points only if that string is there 5 times or more,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Number of times per test

2006-07-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
BODY 2 CONTAINS replikas Michael Thomas Mathbox 978-683-6718 1-877-MATHBOX (Toll Free) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Friday, July 14, 2006 1:52 PM To: declude.junkmail

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Syntax...

2006-07-03 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Anyone ? Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) Sent: Friday, June 30, 2006 10:14 AM To: declude.junkmail@declude.com Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Message Syntax... I am getting some

[Declude.JunkMail] Message Syntax...

2006-06-30 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I am getting some of the typical messages through... the ones with just a linked image in the body.. I am wondering how the syntax for the linked image works .. I have a line : src=cid:stuffhere$stuffhere$stuffhere What is the syntax, or what do the sections break down into ? Is it

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] This doesnt add up

2006-04-05 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I've been seeing this for weeks. I reported it, and I believe they are working on a fix. Sometimes Declude doesn't put ANYTHING in the headers. Kind of hard to figure out why something got through in the meantime, though.. Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

2006-01-17 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I can confirm that. If a single email address is white listed, then all of them get white listed. The solution was a line like this : BYPASSWHITELIST bypasswhitelist 45 6 0 0 If an email was over weight 45, AND it also had 6 or more recipients, than it bypassed the white-listing

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

2006-01-17 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Eng. (Karl Drugge) To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Tuesday, January 17, 2006 3:17 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address I can confirm that. If a single email address is white listed, then all of them get white listed. The solution

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Whitelisting email address

2006-01-17 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
, money and frustration. It's not fair if it is avoidable. Please reconsider your choices. Maybe we can help you figure out a better way to deal with this. Matt IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge) wrote: I hold at 20, bounce at 40, and delete at 60. I realize bouncing is bad, but were

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] does anyone punish email from these folks?

2005-12-20 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I block that entire class A Nothing but issues with the entire range. If someone gets blocked, they can call a user and have them request an exception. Karl Drugge -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mike K @

[Declude.JunkMail] Speaking of punishment....

2005-12-20 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Weve been getting a LOT of emails from 9 particular IPs, Im talking about 60-70% of incoming. Nothing but 30+ recipient emails, with non-existent email addresses on our domain. The majority of them dont even have one valid address on my domain. Its all getting caught in our filters and

[Declude.JunkMail] Free SPAM RBL's ?

2005-12-14 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
I am currently using SPAMCOP, and pretty happy with it, but wouldnt mind adding another. What is everyone else using for an external RBL ? Karl Drugge B.S.I.T., A.S., M.C.S.E. ( NT 4.0 + 2000 ), C.C.N.A., C.C.D.A., Network+, A+ I dream of the day when I will learn to stop asking

[Declude.JunkMail] SPF PASS/FAIL test format

2005-12-08 Thread IS - Systems Eng. \(Karl Drugge\)
Quick question on the global.cfg file I upgraded to 3.0.5 yesterday. Working great so far. I want to add the SPFPASS and SPFFAIL tests.. what is the format ? I want to subtract 7 points for a pass, and add 7 points for a fail( if theyre too stupid to have an SPF by now ) I have this,

[Declude.JunkMail] Per user tests....

2003-12-09 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Argh. I know this has been covered buy I can't find it in my own archives from the group.. Where do I define per user tests ? I am trying to use the REDIRECT ( REDIRECT [EMAIL PROTECTED] c:\dir\dir\username.txt ) statement to point at a username.txt with their own configs in it. Particularly

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user tests....

2003-12-09 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
OK, I guess I can deal with that. A bit processor intensive for one PITA user, but if that's the way it is... If I define the tests ( ie: a fromfile ) in the global.cfg, how do I make it apply for only one person in the $junkmail file ? I thought points were assigned in the global.cfg, and the

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Per user tests....

2003-12-09 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Ahh. OK. I am getting it now. So, to whitelist for that particular users fromfile, I would set the test to assign weight 0 in my global.cfg, and then in the users config file ( a renamed copy of the $junkmail file ), I would use a ROUTETO statement ? Is this correct ? Karl Drugge

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Reverse DNS...

2003-12-05 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Do what I do I have a rule defined that subtracts the points my REVDNS rule adds, and put the domains I ned to get through in that list. Kind of clunky and mna-power intensive, but it works for me. I couldnt imagine doing it for hundreds of domains Karl Drugge

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] How good does it get?

2003-11-20 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
I don't care how much you monitor, you are NOT going to get a 100% capture rate with no false positives. If there was a way to do that, Scott would be a millionaire by now, and have twenty or thirty death threats from spammers. You can get close, like maybe a 90% or 95% if you're super particular,

[Declude.JunkMail] Comments on this ?

2003-11-07 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
I have a client that is getting HAMMERED by mass SPAM emailings. In excess of 500,000 emails a month are getting deleted on an 80 user network. His Internet connection is totally flooded. Ive been working with him over the past 9 months or so and have been trying to track things down to a

[Declude.JunkMail] Holy Bandwidth Hog, Batman !

2003-10-08 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Looking at some logs for a client, and was slightly horrified. This guy runs DECLUDE on a P-3 333mhz machine with 256 meg of RAM, off of half a T-1. He WAS running about 2/3's of this level last month. Keep in mind, he only has 80+/- users. He is getting about 95% kill ratio on his SPAM. He has

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More and more email getting past Declude

2003-09-02 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Title: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] More and more email getting past Declude Theyve cleaned up their acts. I am seeing a lot of stuff come straight through with a single hit. It ALMOST seems like if mail fails a few tests, its legit ! Karl Drugge -Original Message- From:

[Declude.JunkMail] Blocking attachments

2003-08-19 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Just double checking, but we do NOT have a way to block specific attachments in Declude JM Pro, correct ? Karl Drugge, Systems Network Engineer --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list.

[Declude.JunkMail] Reporting Software, script attached

2003-08-19 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
For anyone who wants this, here's a new script that will sort your delude log files and gives a simple easy to read report. This ones been cleaned up since the last one, and takes into account garbled and corrupt log files. Much easier to use, and no file renaming required. The only thing you have

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Best Practices question

2003-07-17 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
Not to bash Scott, who is the freaking GOD of SMTP traffic.. but EEWWW.. yuck. FIND will work, but I'd have to wash my hands afterwards. My computer is supposed to do my work FOR me, on a daily basis, and mail me my checks at home ! ( I wish ! )... Just write up a quick PERL/WSH/Shell script to

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Spam Attack

2003-07-10 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
While I haven't seen this particular type of attack, I do have one client that is seeing something very similar. He is getting mail-bombed from numerous spam sites/IP's.. he is rejecting over 300 an hour, and this is for a site with only a 512k connection and 50 users... It's been happening for

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Wish list reminder... :-)

2003-05-29 Thread IS - Systems Eng. (Karl Drugge)
This is precisely what we do, although not to the tune of 150k messages a day. Imail and Declude make an AWESOME gateway mail server. Only when external contact is required ( in or out ) do we actually have to touch the Imail/declude box. Our internal Exchange server isn't bothered with all the