To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 06, 2010 5:54 PM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] dns servers for declude
Hi Bono,
We can look at adding a second DNS entry to declude.
1. What was your DNS failure ?
2. Under what circumstances would you
Hi,
I have 5 sites and 5 dns servers. Each is primary for it's own site and
secondary for another site. I can survive any single dns server failure
except when it comes to Declude.
A long time ago we were told Declude does not properly follow the Windows
settings for primary, secondary
@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam tests
Please see the log entry below. The DNS lookup for the MA and A record
failed. Why would that not add weight to any of my tests. Am I missing
some? Seems to me that if these fail that it should be weighted
...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:11 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests
Hi Harry,
As far as I know mail servers that are strictly outbound don't need to use
an MX record
...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Harry
vanderzand
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:28 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests
Sorry but I am not sure what you mean by outbound in the sample below. I
: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam tests
Sorry but I am not sure what you mean by outbound in the sample below. I
also do not know what specific test should be triggered other than something
should be.
Here I have mail coming in from a domain. DNS lookup
4S1
519-741-1222
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of David
Barker
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 10:57 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests
Some email server has the task
, February 03, 2009 10:28 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests
Sorry but I am not sure what you mean by outbound in the sample below. I
also do not know what specific test should be triggered other than something
should
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests
I would agree. However if a record exists but the server does not, I would
want to add a bit to my weight score. It certainly shows that something is
not right
However, thank you
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS lookup fail, yet e-mail passes spam
tests
Anyone have any ideas on this topic?
Thank you
Harry Vanderzand
Intown Internet
117 Ruskview Road
Kitchener, ON, N2M 4S1
519-741-1222
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp
Hello,
I've had to take Spamhaus out of our DNS blacklists. I was not previously
aware that they had limits on free use. We exceed those limits. I think
their price is a bit steep, though, so I'm looking for effective DNS
blacklists to put in our connection checks.
I have Spamcop and CBL
From: supp...@declude.com [mailto:supp...@declude.com] On Behalf Of Katie
LaSalle-Lowery
Sent: Monday, January 26, 2009 12:46 PM - MGMT
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Blacklists
Hello,
I've had to take Spamhaus out of our DNS blacklists. I
: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Tools
Hi
1-I was using dnsstuff, first it was free, then 25$/year which is OK
now it is 75, too expensive for me (i only use it about 6 time per year)
anyone knows of a similar free site ?
2-also, my server ip ( 217.170.148.6) is curently filtered by yahoo.
how do i find
Hi
1-I was using dnsstuff, first it was free, then 25$/year which is OK
now it is 75, too expensive for me (i only use it about 6 time per year)
anyone knows of a similar free site ?
2-also, my server ip ( 217.170.148.6) is curently filtered by yahoo.
how do i find if it is on other balcklists
Pagillo declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re[4]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Kevin, in our experience, the two OpenDNS servers (208.67.220.220
and 208.67.222.222) that we suggest be used with Declude, work
wonderfully and the uptime is excellent.
Uptime should be 100% on DNS servers. It's
.
- Original Message -
From: Sanford Whiteman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Linda Pagillo declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 4:52 AM
Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
In a perfect world this would be correct, but as you already know
from working
In a perfect world this would be correct, but as you already know
from working in the IT profession, no server, DNS or otherwise has
an uptime of 100%.
A single physical DNS server may go down, sure, whatever. The DNS
config (redundant DNS servers or load-balanced on a virtual IP) used
by
There is also the question of loss of connectivity from point A to OpenDNS
server #1 which is all that you have if you setup Declude to use a Single
Source DNS server. If anywhere in that path there is an outage you will
have no DNS.
Far better to learn a little about DNS and run your own. Then
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 4:52 AM
To: Linda Pagillo
Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
In a perfect world this would be correct, but as you already know from
working in the IT profession, no server, DNS or otherwise has
, 2008 4:44 AM
To: Linda Pagillo declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
In a perfect world this would be correct, but as you already know
from working in the IT profession, no server, DNS or otherwise has
an uptime of 100%.
A single physical DNS server may
Thanks Kevin. I will be sure to pass this info on to the customers that i speak
with.
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 2:19 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: Re[6]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
I
I have a suggestion since DNS is so critical to Declude. A secure recursive
bind implementation can be setup in less than 5 minutes.
Kevin, thank you very much for proving the absurd ease with which this
one (of many) DNS servers can be set up for this purpose, and to
everybody else who
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 11:48 AM
To: Kevin Bilbee
Subject: Re[8]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
I have a suggestion since DNS is so critical to Declude. A secure
recursive
bind implementation can be setup in less than 5
Yeah, that would surprise me utterly, since they wouldn't be able to
do _anything else_ with said servers that would lead them to believe
they were suitable for Declude's use.
I worked for an ISP for a long time before joining Declude. DNS
servers are NOT useless without the recursive
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sanford
Whiteman
Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2008 1:35 PM
To: Linda Pagillo
Subject: Re[8]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Yeah, that would surprise me utterly, since they wouldn't be able to
do _anything else_
Thanks, K. ipconfig from a mailserver that can surf the net is another duh
quickie... .
--Sandy
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at
The diags.txt file is created as infomation whent he declude proc
service is restarted.
One thign you need to check is do you have a DNSOVERRIDE set in your
declude.cfg file?
Declude by default (as long as there is no DNSOVERRIDE) will use the IP
of the DNS server in Imail Admin interface.
, 2008 9:32 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
The diags.txt file is created as infomation whent he declude proc
service is restarted.
One thign you need to check is do you have a DNSOVERRIDE set in your
declude.cfg file?
Declude by default (as long
]) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 8:14 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
The diags.txt file is created as infomation whent he declude proc
service is restarted.
One thign you need to check is do you have a DNSOVERRIDE set
DNSSOVERIDE was only really applicable to Declude version 2.0
David B
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gary
Steiner
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 11:26 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Also, we suggest that you use the following DNS server with Declude
208.67.220.220. This is an OpenDNS server and it is extremely reliable.
Sorry to be meddlesome, but recommending that a single, remote,
uncontrolled DNS server always be used for Declude's RBL lookups
kinda flies in
, October 08, 2008 5:06 PM
To: Linda Pagillo declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Also, we suggest that you use the following DNS server with Declude
208.67.220.220. This is an OpenDNS server and it is extremely reliable.
Sorry to be meddlesome, but recommending
Subject: re: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Sandy, we suggest that you use the one that we recommend because 95% of
issues with declude are related to in-house DNS servers not working to do
recursive lookups correctly causing problems for our customers. I'm sure
Todd has the skills to support
set up on their
local DNS servers.
From: Kevin Bilbee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 7:06 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: Re[2]: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
I would have to agree with sandy. I use Open DNS at home
Kevin, in our experience, the two OpenDNS servers (208.67.220.220
and 208.67.222.222) that we suggest be used with Declude, work
wonderfully and the uptime is excellent.
Uptime should be 100% on DNS servers. It's 2008! This should not even
be a consideration. No matter how
Hi everyone -
I moved my primary internal DNS server to a new location last night (seeing
up another site in the WAN), and had planned on using the other DNS servers.
However, since moving it my spam has been high. I changed the DNS to the
other server in the diags.txt, and the
with Declude
208.67.220.220. This is an OpenDNS server and it is extremely reliable.
From: Todd Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 2:48 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Hi everyone -
I moved my
: re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Todd, changing the DNS in the actual diags.txt file will do nothing. This is
just a text file that is generated from information in the .cfg files. In
order to change the DNS that declude uses, you must add the following line
to your global.cfg. file...
DNS
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Todd, you can uncomment the line in the global.cfg and change the 127.0.0.1
to 208.67.220.220. Yes, my educated guess would be that your spam increase
is directly related to the DNS server move. I suggest always using
You're welcome! It's my pleasure!
From: Todd Richards [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2008 6:20 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Changes
Thanks Linda. It does seem like the spam has gone down, but I
Read here to see if this affects your servers
http://www.theregister.co.uk/2007/11/06/icann_rolls_out_new_root_name_server_address/
Kevin Bilbee
Network Administrator
Standard Abrasives, Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Changing the way industry works.
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Darin Cox
Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 2:49 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today
Hmmm.. I thought I remembered Scott saying he was keeping DNSStuff to
himself when he sold Declude. I guess he changed his mind
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today
Given this, it's even more interesting how DNSStuff.com repeatedly sent me
emails asking me to subscribe to their pay services, had no unsubscribe
information in their email, no automated unsubscribe link, was not CAN SPAM
compliant
: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 11:06 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today
Jay,
Are you sure there was no unsubscribe? I just checked and there is a
link
which says To unsubscribe from our periodic e-mail messages, please
click
the following if you
13, 2007 2:19 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today
There may be now, but when the pay stuff was launched, there definitely
wasn't anything like that. Attached are a couple of the messages I got (I
was getting them pretty often ...).
-Jay
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 9:10 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today
Not panicking... just curious as to what's going on over there...
Darin.
- Original
on DNSStuff.com out of
curiousity and got a few different domain squatters.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 5:55 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] dns
Don't panic Darin, Scott is still involved with DNSStuff, just not in a PR
role.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Darin
Cox
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:59 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] dns
Not panicking... just curious as to what's going on over there...
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: David Barker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2007 8:54 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today
Don't panic Darin, Scott
fyi -
http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=116685WT.svl=news2_1
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can be found
at
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick
Hayer
Sent: Wednesday, February 07, 2007 5:07 PM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today
fyi -
http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=116685WT.svl=news2_1
-Nick
---
This E
: [Declude.JunkMail] dns attacks today
fyi -
http://www.darkreading.com/document.asp?doc_id=116685WT.svl=news2_1
-Nick
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
type unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail. The archives can
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=97
The link from the online manual isn't working.
[DNS-based]
There are over 50 different ip4r format DNS tests available. Click the
link to the left for more information on tests not listed below.
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing
]
Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2006 10:10 AM
To: declude.junkmail@declude.com
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Based Test - Bad Link on Web
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=97
The link from the online manual isn't working.
[DNS-based]
There are over 50 different ip4r format DNS tests
: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS timeouts
http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/JunkMail/JM_2.0.6.asp
Can you specify more than one DNS server to queary?
I am getting quite a few dns timeouts. We are going to setup a
dedicated caching server for declude/imail to use. I would like to
use two
http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/JunkMail/JM_2.0.6.asp
Can you specify more than one DNS server to queary?
I am getting quite a few dns timeouts. We are going to setup a dedicated
caching server for declude/imail to use. I would like to use two for
performance reasons. It would be
More so that just to deal with intermittent timeouts, having a single
DNS server barf can result in significant spam leakage and having the
option of a fail over would be very, very nice to have.
Matt
Travis Sullivan wrote:
http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/JunkMail/JM_2.0.6.asp
Can
.
- Original Message -
From: Travis Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, October 31, 2005 9:50 PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS timeouts
http://www.declude.com/Version/Manuals/JunkMail/JM_2.0.6.asp
Can you specify more than one DNS server to queary?
I am
I am in the process of adding ORF into the mix for address
validation. Can you or others describe the process that you employ
with ORF?
Two options in this area:
(1) a simple ASCII text file of the valid recipient addresses
exported from your mailbox server directory
Which ones still work?
__ __ __ __
Sent via the CMS Internet Webmail system at mail1.cmsinter.net
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and
I've got my monthly results listed here:
http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/spamtestbymonth.html
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Bohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's
Which ones
:
http://it.farmprogress.com/declude/spamtestbymonth.html
- Original Message -
From: Timothy Bohen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's
Which ones still work
Here are the one's I use on my system (best if viewed with a fixed width
font). Looking at your global.cfg I would add the following: SBL, XBL,
MXRATE, UCE, DSBL, and SPAMCOP. I would also add in CMDSPACE as thats
pretty good. Looking at your global.cfg you have a lot of the default RBL's
month.html
- Original Message -
From: "Timothy Bohen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's
Which ones still work?
__ __ __ ___
t;Timothy Bohen" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Thursday, September 15, 2005 9:58 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's
Which ones still work?
__ __ __ __
Sent via the CMS Internet Web
9:58 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS RBL's
Which ones still work?
__ __ __ __
Sent via the CMS Internet Webmail system at mail1.cmsinter.net
---
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list
Hi Matt -
Matt wrote:
Nick,
I think that it is worth while to point out that your stats are likely
skewed by dictionary attacks and backscatter. The overwhelming
predominance of SURBL and Sniffer-Pharmacy hits (named slightly
differently on your system), along with the massive number
Title: Message
I did !!
But there's inconsistence between MMC and registry,
The MMC is checked, but the Registry key isn't there.
So I added this key.
Let's see in some hours.
Regards
Andres.-
Colbeck, Andrew escribi:
Andres, have you checked out:
.
-
Original Message -
From:
Ing.
Andrs E. Gallo
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 8:37 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS cache problems
I did !!
But there's inconsistence between MMC and registry,
The MMC is checked
. Adding the key with it turned on has no effect.
Darin.
-
Original Message -
From:
Colbeck,
Andrew
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Wednesday, August 03, 2005 10:48 AM
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS cache problems
The presence of the key
Question about the list at
http://www.declude.com/Articles.asp?ID=97
I see at the top it says last updated2 June
2005, and there are some tests that look new to me, but the bottom of the page
with the history of test additions and deletions hasn't been updated in a
year.
Is it possible
After
upgrading and implementing the slightly modified global.cfg file that comes
with the latest distribution, my non-local dns related tests dont seem
to be working anymore. Im still tagging spam but Im only seeing
weight being added from the locally performed tests. Is there something
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS SPF Record
Are most of you using a SPF record
in your DNS? Are you noticing a difference?
Kyle
have postmaster or abuse even setup.
- Original Message -
From:
Darin Cox
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 9:57
AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS SPF
Record
We use it. For us the main benefit is to
keep spammers from
That would require the receiving mail server to
check SPF. Many don't, but we find it useful.
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: William Stillwell
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:29 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS SPF Record
How does SPF
StillwellSent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 10:29 AMTo:
Declude.JunkMail@declude.comSubject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS SPF
Record
How does SPF tell you that a rouge server is
forging mail from one of your customers, if you server isn't receiving the
forged mail? I noticed the majority of other email
] On Behalf Of William Stillwell
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 9:29
AM
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail]
DNS SPF Record
How does SPF tell you that a rouge server is forging mail
from one of your customers, if you server isn't receiving the forged mail? I
noticed
Are most of you using a SPF record in your DNS? Are you
noticing a difference?
Kyle
y used spf, it would of marked them
or deleted them as spam.
- Original Message -
From:
Kyle Fisher
To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com
Sent: Monday, April 25, 2005 12:44
PM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS SPF
Record
Are most of you using a SPF record
in your DN
Does the DNS global.cfg list work in 1.82 or is it only availabel in 2.05.
I just tried to switch to 2.05 and it would not delete email that was at or
above my hold weight. I am thinking it is the copy_all_account issue. I have
reverted back to 1.82.
Kevin Bilbee
---
[This E-mail was scanned
Thanks John!
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolf
Tombe
Sent: Saturday, October 16, 2004
12:57 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS
Question
I apologize if this is a bit off topic, but Im in the process of setting up a new
I apologize if this is a bit off topic, but Im in the process of setting up a new network from the ground up. I have an option of using a .NET domain vs. a .COM domain as the primary for the network itself. Whichever I pick will be used as the fully qualified domain name for the name
: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS
Question
I apologize if this is a bit off topic, but Im in the process of setting up a new network from the ground up. I have an option of using a .NET domain vs. a .COM domain as the primary for the network itself. Whichever I pick will be used as the fully qualified domain name
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dave Doherty
Sent: Monday, October 04, 2004 10:13 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Servers on W2K box
Hi,
I second Matt's comments. I have been using MSDNS for years with no problems
on an Imail server that runs 60-80,000
:12 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Servers on W2K box
Hi,
I second Matt's comments. I have been using MSDNS for years with no
problems on an Imail server that runs 60-80,000 messages a day.
Be certain that you understand DNS well, particularly PTR entries.
Set up primary and secondary DNS
form is a very nice script.
- Original Message -
From: Dave Doherty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, October 05, 2004 2:17 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Servers on W2K box - AutoSecondary
Script
Hi, All-
I posted my DNS AutoSecondary script for anyone who
on the primary. You only need to run the script whenever you
add or delete a domain.
-Dave Doherty
Skywaves, inc.
- Original Message -
From: Matt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 7:33 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Servers on W2K box
I've been
Hey Guys,
What is the best DNS server to run on a W2K box. I was using the Microsoft
DNS server but have been running into some problems. I reloaded it now it
will not do lookups. My upstream provider will not let me point my Mail
server to their DNS servers because of the amount of lookup
MS DNS works fine. We've been using it for years with no problems.
What does the event log say?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Bennie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 9:36 AM
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Servers on W2K box
Hey Guys,
What
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 9:53 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Servers on W2K box
MS DNS works fine. We've been using it for years with no problems.
What does the event log say?
Darin.
- Original Message -
From: Bennie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
What is the best DNS server to run on a W2K box. I was using the Microsoft
DNS server but have been running into some problems. I reloaded it now it
will not do lookups. My upstream provider will not let me point my Mail
server to their DNS servers because of the amount of lookup from
I have seen the same problem. Just switched to Simple DNS.
- Original Message -
From: Bennie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, October 03, 2004 10:08 AM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Servers on W2K box
the problems we were having is that the dns server would
I've been running on W2k MS DNS with high volume and many lookups for
each message and it has performed flawlessly as far as I can tell.
I would suggest turning off the caching of DNS within IMail along with
failed domain skipping, and also make sure that there is only one DNS
server listed in
Hi,
I have one for you DNS experts out
there.
We host DNS for a client that runs his
own mail server, and we have received delegation from ATT for his IP
block.
I can see nothing wrong in our setup, yet
some places can see the PTR record for his mail server's IP address, and some
Hey Scott-
So I changed it to
99.96/28IN PTR mail.crofuttsmith.com
And now it works.
Can you explain why?
-Dave
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Puzzler
I
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=12.20.208.99 shows that ATT is
delegating the
reverse DNS for 12.20.208.99 to dns.skywaves.net, using the hostname
99.96/28.208.20.12.in-addr.arpa. But dns.skywaves.net doesn't have a
PTR record for
99.96/28.208.20.12.in-addr.arpa.
So I changed it to
Ok, thanks.
-d
- Original Message -
From: R. Scott Perry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 28, 2004 7:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS Puzzler
http://www.dnsstuff.com/tools/ptr.ch?ip=12.20.208.99 shows that ATT is
delegating the
reverse DNS
Hi,
On Friday a message when though and got nailed by MAILPOLICE, SENDERDB
and SPAMCOP:
09/10/2004 13:28:39 Qe43e1bcf003e3e27 Msg failed MAILPOLICE-BULK (This
E-mail came from eweek-zannounce.com, a potential spam source listed in
MAILPOLICE-BULK.). Action=WARN.
09/10/2004 13:28:39
: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS
Set up your own caching DNS server, don't rely on your upstream
provider.
I made the mistake of using forwarders back before I new better,
Sprint
shut
me down one time because I was hammering on them with spam database
lookups.
Fritz
Frederick P. Squib, Jr.
Network Operations
forwards and then only local DNS requests were
resolved.
Thank,
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R.
Scott Perry
Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 2004 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] DNS
I am having
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo
