[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2007-08-17 Thread Michael Hoyt
I am attempting to create a filter that contains conditions that will cause a HOLD on the emails that it matches. My HOLD weight is 100 but I also use some reverse weighting so I was thinking that adding 500 points should do it. In my global.cfg I have : BLACKFILTER filter

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2007-08-17 Thread Linda Pagillo
PROTECTED] - Original Message - From: Michael Hoyt [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Declude JunkMail @declude.com Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Friday, August 17, 2007 10:32 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question I am attempting to create a filter that contains conditions that will cause

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2006-05-14 Thread John Doyle
I've just started using Sniffer and am wondering if I can create a test for the following condition and take an action. Say: if the declude score is greater than 20 and Sniffer has not been triggered, copy the message to a spam account. So something like header contains WEIGHT20 and doesn't

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2006-02-14 Thread John T \(Lists\)
I need to create a filter for a client that I am gatewaying their Exchange server. I have their server listed in the Global.cfg for whitelisting. (WHITELIST IP yaddayaddayadda) Now there is a need to create a filter file so that if the e-mail is from a broadcast address and to an

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2006-02-14 Thread Matt
Move the whitelist setting to a custom filter and place an END on the filter for the condition that you want to track elsewhere: MAILFROM END IS [EMAIL PROTECTED] REMOTEIP WHITELIST IS 12.34.56.78 Have a good evening, Matt John T (Lists) wrote: I need to create a filter

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2006-02-14 Thread John T \(Lists\)
Thanks Matt. John T eServices For You Seek, and ye shall find! -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 3:46 PM To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2005-02-24 Thread John Carter
The following header lines are the basis of my question. The from domain (mine) does not match the from [IP] address (not mine.) Received: from jcjc.edu [65.240.76.232] by bobcat.jcjc.edu with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.15) id AB4F105B014E; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:01:35 -0600 From: Returned mail [EMAIL

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2005-02-24 Thread Marc Catuogno
] Filter question The following header lines are the basis of my question. The from domain (mine) does not match the from [IP] address (not mine.) Received: from jcjc.edu [65.240.76.232] by bobcat.jcjc.edu with ESMTP (SMTPD32-8.15) id AB4F105B014E; Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:01:35 -0600 From: Returned

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2005-02-24 Thread Darin Cox
] To: Declude.JunkMail@declude.com Sent: Thursday, February 24, 2005 9:54 AM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question I have my own domain in the spamdomains test and then I have Whitelist Auth so almost anytime something appears to me from [EMAIL PROTECTED] if it isn't whitelisted because

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2004-09-30 Thread John Carter
Scott: I set up a filter of MAILFROM 0 STARTSWITH [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am only holding right now. The following was caught. Notice the coups@ is in the Received: line, not the From: line. Should this one have been caught or skipped? BTW, in 24 hours have caught around 600 msgs with this and

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2004-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
I set up a filter of MAILFROM 0 STARTSWITH [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am only holding right now. The following was caught. Notice the coups@ is in the Received: line, not the From: line. Should this one have been caught or skipped? It should have been caught. That's because the sender was actually

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-12-17 Thread Markus Gufler
can be dinamically reduced for large messages. Markus From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Doug Anderson Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 4:32 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-12-16 Thread Doug Anderson
This may sound stupid, but if I create a filter searching for a string in an email... BODY2CONTAINSxyz and the email contains 4 instances of that string now is the xyx time for all xyz good men xyz to come to the aid xyz of their country does the filter return an internal value of 8 or 2?

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-12-16 Thread Bill Landry
It will return a weight of 2. The filter will only flag the first occurrence that it finds, then ignores the rest. Bill - Original Message - From: Doug Anderson To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, December 16, 2003 7:32 AM Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-12-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
This may sound stupid, but if I create a filter searching for a string in an email... BODY 2 CONTAINS xyz and the email contains 4 instances of that string now is the xyx time for all xyz good men xyz to come to the aid xyz of their country does the filter return an internal value of 8 or 2?

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Title: Filter question Good morning, For the spam that doesnt contain a URL that I can block in my URL filter, I have taken to trying to find phrases that I can block in my BODY filter. My question is Should I be blocking these phrases using the text in the email that I can see, or

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
For the spam that doesn t contain a URL that I can block in my URL filter, I have taken to trying to find phrases that I can block in my BODY filter. My question is Should I be blocking these phrases using the text in the email that I can see, or should I be blocking phrases that appear when

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question On Short Keywords

2003-10-16 Thread Darrell LaRock
We make extensive use of filters based on keywords. With short keywords like like S_e_x we sometimes run into problems with keyword being triggered based on base64 encoding of an attachment. Example: 10/13/2003 00:00:36 Q236256fe026ef9a4 Triggered CONTAINS filter WORDFILTER on sex [weight-2;

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 10:05 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question For the spam that doesn t contain a URL that I can block in my URL filter, I have taken to trying to find phrases that I can block

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
In this last example that everyone's filter probably caught, the original email came through unflagged, but when I forwarded it to the list, the filter caught it. Remember that failing a test and flagging (or any other action) are very different. In this case, the original question made it seem

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Remember that failing a test and flagging (or any other action) are very different. In this case, the original question made it seem as though the E-mail wasn't failing the test, whereas it may be that the E-mail did fail the test but an action other than the one you wanted was used. The

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
Here are the message headers: X-Spam-Tests-Failed: ROUTING OK, it did not fail the INBODYFILTER test. Here is the line in the filter itself: BODY 0 CONTAINS Bachelors and other higher education available in your fields And here is the line, copied and pasted directly from the spam email that

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
Those do look the same. Did you cut and paste it from what you were viewing in the E-mail, or from the source? I cut and pasted it from what I was viewing in the email, NOT from the source, hence my original question. I did go back and run the -diag and I am definitely running JM 1.75 Sharyn

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread R. Scott Perry
I cut and pasted it from what I was viewing in the email, NOT from the source, hence my original question. I did go back and run the -diag and I am definitely running JM 1.75 So now I would ask what the source of the E-mail shows? -Scott ---

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-10-16 Thread Sharyn Schmidt
So now I would ask what the source of the E-mail shows? This particular one, came in plain text, I just realized. That is probably why I didn't use the source to begin with. When I right click on it, view source is greyed out. I would be happy to forward the email to the list but I did that

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-08-27 Thread Kevin Bilbee
I have setup a filter to froward all email that seems to be from the sobig virus to a specian mail box. Global.CFG SOBIGFILTER filter D:\IMail\Declude\SOBIG.txt x 0 0 sobig.txt REMOTEIP 0 IS 206.111.17.194 REMOTEIP 0 IS 66.185.39.38 REMOTEIP 0 IS

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-08-27 Thread Kevin Bilbee
] Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question I have setup a filter to froward all email that seems to be from the sobig virus to a specian mail box. Global.CFG SOBIGFILTER filter D:\IMail\Declude\SOBIG.txt x 0 0 sobig.txt REMOTEIP 0 IS 206.111.17.194 REMOTEIP 0

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-08-27 Thread R. Scott Perry
I checked my logs and the REMOTEIP lines are catching the mail but the subject lines with RE: are not catching the mail. the subject lines without the RE: are catching the emails. That is odd. Could there be spaces/tabs at the end of the lines that aren't working? If that doesn't explain it,

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2003-08-27 Thread Kevin Bilbee
, 2003 5:45 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question I checked my logs and the REMOTEIP lines are catching the mail but the subject lines with RE: are not catching the mail. the subject lines without the RE: are catching the emails. That is odd. Could

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question

2003-08-04 Thread Hirthe, Alexander
Hello, what am I doing wrong? I have an IP Filter called BAD-IP, a textfile with ip adresses and a test for the user. But still the mails get through. global.cfg: [...] BAD-IP ipfile C:\IMail\Declude\BAD-IP.txt x 5 0 [...] c:\imail\declude\bad-ip.txt (yes, it's

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question

2003-08-04 Thread R. Scott Perry
global.cfg: [...] BAD-IP ipfile C:\IMail\Declude\BAD-IP.txt x 5 0 [...] c:\imail\declude\bad-ip.txt (yes, it's really there ;-) [...] 217.173.135.114 [...] This looks good. Header: -- Received: from mail3.cytainment.de [217.173.135.114] by siller.de with

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
Hi Scott, Nothing like a quiet Sunday morning to get the questions going. I have a filter question and will use the following header to explain. The e-mail is being handled correctly by JunkMail according to the GLOBAL.CFG settings I would like to be able to filter on the domain names of

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question

2003-02-02 Thread R. Scott Perry
I would like to be able to filter on the domain names of mailservers in the chain. In this case I would like to have an entry such as WHATEVER CONTAINS .aebolts.com (Where WHATEVER is a valid filter screening criteria for the mailservers in the chain). I know I can use HEADER for this but is

RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question

2003-02-02 Thread George Kulman
the secondary MX's. George -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of R. Scott Perry Sent: Sunday, February 02, 2003 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question I would like to be able to filter on the domain names

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2002-11-22 Thread John Tolmachoff
If I have a line in a filter, say: MAILFROM-8 CONTAINS@domain.com The test is defined in the Global.cfg like this: MYFILTERfilter c:\imail\declude\filter.txt x -10 0 That would give any message from @domain.com a negative weight of 18, correct? John

[Declude.JunkMail] filter question

2002-11-21 Thread Mike K
Can Junkmail pro filters (for msg body) use wildcards? Is there a reference? I want to create a filter (to hold) msgs that have embedded urls with IP addresses in them. I can do this is my IMGate machine but want to see what I catch first. Mike --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] filter question

2002-11-21 Thread R. Scott Perry
Can Junkmail pro filters (for msg body) use wildcards? No. Is there a reference? The Filtering section of the manual covers the filtering. We do plan to add a reference section to the manual like for the whitelisting/blacklisting. I want to create a filter (to hold) msgs that have

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question...

2002-09-30 Thread Mark Smith
One question about filters... You assign the rule in the Global.cfg file a weight. You also assign each filter a weight. Are these two weights added to get the final weight for the message? For example, if you have: MYFILTER filter c:\iMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x 5 0 And in

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter Question...

2002-09-30 Thread R. Scott Perry
One question about filters... You assign the rule in the Global.cfg file a weight. You also assign each filter a weight. Are these two weights added to get the final weight for the message? For example, if you have: MYFILTER filter c:\iMail\Declude\myfilter.txt x 5 0 And in

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2002-08-01 Thread Bill Landry
Scott, I guess I could test this, but I'm sure you can tell me off the top of your head. When using the BODY search in the filter file, does Declude search just the actual body of the e-mail message or does it search all attachments, as well? I'm guessing it's just the actual body of the

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2002-08-01 Thread R. Scott Perry
Scott, I guess I could test this, but I'm sure you can tell me off the top of your head. When using the BODY search in the filter file, does Declude search just the actual body of the e-mail message or does it search all attachments, as well? It searches the entire body of the E-mail, which

[Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2002-06-20 Thread Rick Davidson
How would I go about filtering for this in the header? Is it possible? To: Undisclosed Recipients Have a great day! Rick Davidson Buckeye Internet Services www.buckeyeweb.com 440-953-1900 - --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail

Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Filter question

2002-06-20 Thread R. Scott Perry
How would I go about filtering for this in the header? Is it possible? To: Undisclosed Recipients It isn't currently possible in Declude JunkMail. It most likely will be possible in an upcoming release, though. However, you should note that Undisclosed Recipients is used by many legitimate