* cove...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: covener
> Date: Wed Jul 25 14:46:33 2018
> New Revision: 1836638
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1836638=rev
> Log:
> add 2 conditional logging examples
>
>
> +# Conditional logging
> +CustomLog logs/access-errors.log common
On Mittwoch, 21. März 2018 23:33:49 CET Daniel Ruggeri wrote:
> Is this something I could do as part of the push to the dist release
> mirrors? I have a script that handles the tarballs and doap updates so
> far. I'm also working on one that will also gather details and prep
> announcements if we
* Yann Ylavic wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 3:10 PM, wrote:
> > +
>
> oO
>
> For those who read the matrix? :)
However that happened... I just rebuilt it and it looks fine. Did you do
anything special with that file, minfrin?
Cheers,
--
> [...] weiß jemand zufällig,
* Jacob Champion wrote:
> [crossposting dev@ and docs@]
>
> On 05/04/2017 04:55 PM, jchamp...@apache.org wrote:
> > Author: jchampion
> > Date: Thu May 4 23:55:48 2017
> > New Revision: 1793940
> >
> > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1793940=rev
> > Log:
> > override index: add deps and
* William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Please re-validate your assumptions before we proceed with this
> discussion. I'll be interested in your findings.
I did. I've decided to drop out of that "discussion".
Cheers,
* William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 3:56 PM, André Malo <n...@perlig.de> wrote:
> > * wr...@apache.org wrote:
> >> Author: wrowe
> >> Date: Tue Apr 18 16:25:03 2017
> >> New Revision: 1791807
> >>
> >> URL: http
* wr...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: wrowe
> Date: Tue Apr 18 16:25:03 2017
> New Revision: 1791807
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1791807=rev
> Log:
> KISS: RemoveType is a simpler fix for .tr
I seem to remember, that removetype does not override mime.types (only
addtype entries).
* j...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: jim
> Date: Wed Jun 29 17:28:53 2016
> New Revision: 1750681
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1750681=rev
> Log:
> vote.
> Required since w/o this patch, previous build fail (no lbmethods)
>
> Removed:
>
* Luca Toscano wrote:
> Hi André!
>
> 2016-02-24 11:44 GMT+01:00 André Malo <n...@perlig.de>:
> > Is there a reason why you reset the banner translations?
>
> I changed the banner's wording a bit for this use case. From (taking 2.0
> one as reference):
>
> &quo
Hi,
* elu...@apache.org wrote:
> Author: elukey
> Date: Wed Feb 24 07:28:24 2016
> New Revision: 1732029
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1732029=rev
> Log:
> Added retirement banner to all the documentation pages to suggest the
> migration to 2.4
Is there a reason why you reset the
split/::/ =>__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http://pub.perlig.de #
* William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Mon, Jun 22, 2015 at 2:01 PM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
* Yann Ylavic wrote:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in Location.
Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I
* Yann Ylavic wrote:
It seems that RedirectMatch isn't documented without the third (URL)
argument, unless in Location.
Huh? Actually it is (or maybe I'm not getting something here). I checked at
least back until 2.0.
http://httpd.apache.org/docs/2.4/mod/mod_alias.html#redirect clearly
* Jim Riggs wrote:
On 1 May 2015, at 10:52, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
* Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Jim Riggs apache-li...@riggs.me
wrote:
Thanks, Yann. I remember looking at this code before
* Niklas Edmundsson wrote:
On Thu, 30 Apr 2015, Yann Ylavic wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 2:57 PM, Jim Riggs apache-li...@riggs.me
wrote:
Thanks, Yann. I remember looking at this code before. The question
remains, though: Is it currently wrong? Does it need to be fixed,
or was this
it should be possible to inspect the original uri (and possibly
take some action).
nd
P.S.: had to look up POLA ;-)
--
Gefunden auf einer Webdesigner-Seite:
Programmierung in HTML, XML, WML, CGI, FLASH
# André Malo # http://pub.perlig.de/ #
* Jan Kaluža wrote:
Hi,
currently, the External Rewriting Program (RewriteMap prg:) is run as
root. I would like to change it but I see three ways how to do it:
1. Execute it right after drop_privileges hook. This looks like best
way, but I haven't found any hook which could be used for
* Tim Bannister wrote:
On 17 Feb 2015, at 22:21, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
However, I always saw this Date header handling as a way to enforce RFC
compliance (e.g. to overwrite Date-headers in mod_asis handlers and
crappy backends). Wrong Date headers may have a huge impact, as I
~},sub{q~Hacker~});
my $japh = q[sub japh { }]; print join #
[ $japh =~ /{(.)}/] - [0] = map $_ - () #André Malo #
= @japh;# http://www.perlig.de/ #
* Eric Covener wrote:
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 4:05 PM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
There are lots of non-mod_proxy modules that act as a proxy of one
sort or another -- shouldn't we just respect their date header if they
issue one?
Hmm, I'm actually wondering why. And which ones
Hi,
I think, most of the directives are compatibility ones. IMHO the best way to
handle a transition to a different configuration concept would be to
introduce a new module (mod_alias_ng or mod_fs_map or so...) instead of
patching the current one and producing a lot of anger (Alias* and
Hi,
only short notes from me. I'd appreciate such a directive very much. I
think, allowing it in .htaccess won't hurt. I can't come up with a use
case, where the person behind the script doesn't have access to the
credentials anyway.
As for the passing right now, you don't need the whole
* Daniel Gruno wrote:
As a user, I'd like to see relevant information. It must be possible to
get the relevant information without javascript (yes!) and without
random clicking (what should I expect from a non-descriptive arrow-link
which feels like an adverstisement?).
I disagree with
Hi,
* Daniel Gruno wrote:
Hi there, dev@ people (and docs@ cc'ed),
For some time now, a lot of us from the documentation team have been
pondering on making our site, well, not so 1990s looking and unappealing.
+1 at the point.
We've had some input from various people over time, and
* William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
In working through this code, I realized that you may have multiple
cookie headers of multiple values for the same cookie name.
Mark Thomas looked at the spec for me and determined they would be
entirely permissible by RFC 6265 S4.2.2. But today we simply log
On Thursday 20 February 2014 16:13:01 Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 10:04 AM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
Anyone?
The doc build tools are confused as well ;-)
nd
On Sunday 16 February 2014 15:58:18 André Malo wrote:
Hi there,
We do have one duplicate
Anyone?
The doc build tools are confused as well ;-)
nd
On Sunday 16 February 2014 15:58:18 André Malo wrote:
Hi there,
We do have one duplicate directive in our tree: HeartbeatStorage (defined
in mod_lbmethod_heartbeat.c and mod_heartmonitor.c)
I find this confusing. How does it work
Hi there,
We do have one duplicate directive in our tree: HeartbeatStorage (defined in
mod_lbmethod_heartbeat.c and mod_heartmonitor.c)
I find this confusing. How does it work? Without digging through the config
code: are they even both initialized? What if they were defined with
different
* cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Mon Jan 13 01:51:58 2014
New Revision: 1557641
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1557641
Log:
don't search for directory indexes/directoryslashes if a URL is in the
middle of being rewritten [in per-dir context]. PR53929
Modified:
* bre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: breser
Date: Sat Oct 19 19:10:33 2013
New Revision: 1533810
* docs/man/rotatelogs.8,
docs/manual/programs/rotatelogs.html.en: Update for -d option.
Huh. These files are both generated (or should be). Please update
rotatelogs.xml instead.
nd
--
Die
* Ben Reser wrote:
On 10/20/13 5:37 AM, André Malo wrote:
* bre...@apache.org wrote:
Author: breser
Date: Sat Oct 19 19:10:33 2013
New Revision: 1533810
* docs/man/rotatelogs.8,
docs/manual/programs/rotatelogs.html.en: Update for -d option.
Huh. These files are both generated
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 14:51:49 Mikhail T. wrote:
09.07.2013 08:31, Eric Covener написав(ла):
I am not surprised that separately documenting is not a priority for
anyone, given it's implemented in httpd for anyone to see.
Source code is not documentation, is it? In matters of encryption
* Stefan Fritsch wrote:
Hi André,
I consider this a new vote and therefore have removed your -1. If you
still are -1, please add it to STATUS again.
On Friday 14 June 2013, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Fri Jun 14 21:07:19 2013
New Revision: 1493247
URL:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
nd: why would you do that in a stable branch?
+ sf: Because it is only annoying
On Friday 14 June 2013 17:34:26 Rainer Jung wrote:
On 14.06.2013 16:41, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2013 21:18:05 Stefan Fritsch wrote:
On Tuesday 11 June 2013, André Malo wrote:
trunk patch: http://svn.apache.org/r1491155
2.4.x patch: trunk patch works
* s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Mon Jun 10 21:41:07 2013
New Revision: 1491612
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1491612
Log:
comment
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
Modified: httpd/httpd/branches/2.4.x/STATUS
URL:
* Rainer Jung wrote:
On 27.03.2013 22:57, jaillet...@apache.org wrote:
Author: jailletc36
Date: Wed Mar 27 21:57:44 2013
New Revision: 1461869
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1461869
Log:
Be more clever when allocating memory for log item to be escaped.
This should save about 70-100
* André Malo wrote:
* Rainer Jung wrote:
A quick draft patch is at
http://people.apache.org/~rjung/patches/ap_escape_logitem_enhanced.patc
h
+ret = apr_palloc(p, length + 3 * escapes);
It should be still 4 * escapes ('\xHH').
Also, escapes should be apr_size_t as well, I think
* Rainer Jung wrote:
On 17.04.2013 11:38, Plüm, Rüdiger, Vodafone Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: André Malo [mailto:n...@perlig.de]
Sent: Mittwoch, 17. April 2013 11:04
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1461869 - /httpd/httpd/trunk/server/util.c
Damn.
+1 from me ;)
nd
On Thursday 31 January 2013 14:57:09 Daniel Gruno wrote:
With another 72 hours passed and no new votes cast, I am satisfied that
the motion has been carried, so to speak. I'll get started preparing the
new site and contacting old authors/maintainers.
With regards,
Oh, a vote deep in the middle of a discussion thread :-(
nd
On Monday 28 January 2013 14:25:09 Daniel Gruno wrote:
With the clock passing 13:20 GMT, the voting has ended, and been
tallied. There was some concern about the DNS solution in the proposal,
which has been adjusted to a subdirectory
[ +/- 0] don't care won't help
[ -1] don't accept mod_macro as a standard module
+1.
--
$_=q?tvc!uif)%*|#Bopuifs!A`#~tvc!Xibu)%*|qsjou#Kvtu!A`#~tvc!KBQI!)*|~
tvc!ifmm)%*|#Qfsm!A`#~tvc!jt)%*|(Ibdlfs(~ # What the hell is JAPH? ;
@_=split/\s\s+#/;$_=(join''=map{chr(ord( # André Malo
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 15:01:15 Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
Sent: Mittwoch, 28. November 2012 13:22
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: Volunteers to drive an MSI build
On
On Wednesday 28 November 2012 17:02:30 Yehuda Katz wrote:
On Wed, Nov 28, 2012 at 10:35 AM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
You know that, and I know that. Jst as our Windows users know
they have no use for source code.
The discussion is moot. The ASF will not provide binary software
* Gregg Smith wrote:
On 11/28/2012 8:10 AM, André Malo wrote:
Some individuals have provided those builds. Nobody has voted on them
(because, how could one - I know, I wouldn't). They are not official
relases.
Which to the average user that does not know this policy, can easily
On Wednesday 07 November 2012 22:16:46 Graham Leggett wrote:
On 07 Nov 2012, at 10:35 PM, André Malo n...@perlig.de wrote:
It feels wrong targeting 0.9 only, would it be possible to do this in a
generic way, say by listing the ones accepted, or by specifying a
minimum?
Hmm, what would
* Graham Leggett wrote:
On 7 Nov 2012, at 17:56, s...@apache.org wrote:
Author: sf
Date: Wed Nov 7 16:56:38 2012
New Revision: 1406719
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1406719view=rev
Log:
New directive HttpProtocol which allows to disable HTTP/0.9 support.
It feels wrong
* Eric Covener wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm wrote:
On 4 Oct 2012, at 17:32, Eric Covener cove...@gmail.com wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1032431view=rev
Log:
mod_rewrite: Fix the RewriteEngine directive to work within a
location.
;print
qq~@{[reverse split/::/ =__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http://www.perlig.de #
--
$_=q?tvc!uif)%*|#Bopuifs!A`#~tvc!Xibu)%*|qsjou#Kvtu!A`#~tvc!KBQI!)*|~
tvc!ifmm)%*|#Qfsm!A`#~tvc!jt)%*|(Ibdlfs(~ # What the hell is JAPH? ;
@_=split/\s\s+#/;$_=(join''=map{chr(ord( # André Malo ;
$_)-1)}split//=$_[0]).$_[1];s s.*s$_see; # http://www.perlig.de/ ;
Also this belongs to the user list...
nd
On Thursday 12 April 2012 10:44:04 Igor Galić wrote:
- Original Message -
I wonder if you would consider this a bug. Here is the situation.
I had a config file in conf.d which loaded some modules.
Alphabetically, it came after the
On Wednesday 29 February 2012 04:11:35 William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
I withdraw this vote, reverting my position to -1, until collaboration and
respect for options and insights of fellow committers as well as project
decisions and votes can be consistently demonstrated.
I always thought, you'd
* William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/26/2012 2:11 PM, André Malo wrote:
* William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Doesn't it seem overtime to take down 1.3 docs from the site,
altogether?
Why?
Because 1.3 code and docs are no longer maintained. Because 1.3 docs
shipped in the tarball, they got
* William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 2/25/2012 10:09 AM, minf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: minfrin
Date: Sat Feb 25 16:09:03 2012
New Revision: 1293634
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1293634view=rev
Log:
The current version of the server is v2.4.
Modified:
, give us a moment to resolve those two issues …
--
Rich Bowen
rbo...@rcbowen.com :: @rbowen
rbo...@apache.org
--
print Just Another Perl Hacker;
# André Malo, http://pub.perlig.de/ #
* Graham Leggett wrote:
On 10 Feb 2012, at 9:55 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Since the build system is shared between at least 2.2, 2.4 and trunk,
this change also moved the man pages from ab, apxs and logrotate from
section 8 to section 1 for 2.2.x. Unfortunately this is now a bit
* Rainer Jung wrote:
Should be move ab, apxs and logrotate back to section 8? I think they
have been there until version 2.2.21 and moving them to section 1 was a
bug for 2.2.x, because it was only meant to be done for 2.4.x and trunk.
For 2.0.x you already have put them into section 8.
Ouch.
Please add a rule flag, that enables this behaviour, if you really need
that. mod_rewrite already has enough fancy magic. (and rewriting in
directory context to a resource named - is perfectly valid)
nd
* cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Thu Feb 2 15:43:41 2012
New
* Guenter Knauf wrote:
Am 08.01.2012 17:20, schrieb Jim Jagielski:
How much is entirely?
Do the80char lines in ap_listen.h, ap_mmn.h, ap_mpm.h, ap_provider.h,
ap_regex.h, ap_regkey.h, ap_slotmem.h, http_core.h, http_protocol,h,
etc etc etc etc also constitute a rating of entirely?
warning would also be helpful.
nd
--
my @japh = (sub{q~Just~},sub{q~Another~},sub{q~Perl~},sub{q~Hacker~});
my $japh = q[sub japh { }]; print join #
[ $japh =~ /{(.)}/] - [0] = map $_ - () #André Malo #
= @japh;# http
* William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
Stealing a plan executed by Colm for 1.3, I'd like to propose that
we set a two week window following committers' return-from-ApacheCon
to execute any backports of general interest and apply important
fixes/backports to pregsub allocation and non-absolute uri
* William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
So isn't it enough to say that The project will choose to publish
further releases only for significant security fixes, or will choose
instead to publish patches for less significant security fixes for
12 months from the date of this final release. From December
On Wednesday 29 June 2011 15:39:32 Igor Galić wrote:
Hey guys,
I would like to add an svn:externals for
docs/manual/build in trunk - any concerns?
There was a lot of discussion about that in the past (about once every year, I
think). I don't have a strong opinion about either way, just
On Wednesday 29 June 2011 16:47:16 Rich Bowen wrote:
On Jun 29, 2011, at 10:43 AM, Rich Bowen wrote:
[rbowen@Rocinante:apache/httpd-trunk]$ du -ksh ./
(06-29 10:39) 249M ./
Oops. 'make distclean'
* Plüm, Rüdiger, VF-Group wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jim Jagielski
Sent: Mittwoch, 29. Juni 2011 17:39
To: dev@httpd.apache.org
Cc: d...@httpd.apache.org
Subject: Re: svn:externals for docs build
On Jun 29, 2011, at 11:00 AM, André Malo wrote:
On Wednesday 29 June
* Stefan Fritsch wrote:
My impression is that mapping to different URLs is by far the more
frequent use case, but I may be wrong. A different idea would be
- Create new directives RewriteToPath, RewriteToURL that don't do
guessing. - Document clearly the problems that may be caused by the
From the peanut gallery:
Oh dear.
The password encryption is called MD5 based crypt (as opposed to the DES
based crypt used in the early days by various systems). MD5 based crypt
is now standard with modern systems. There's nothing Apache-special about
the algorithm. We just use a different
On Thursday 09 December 2010 19:24:17 cove...@apache.org wrote:
Author: covener
Date: Thu Dec 9 18:24:17 2010
New Revision: 1044067
Modified: httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/vhosts/name-based.xml
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/vhosts/name-base
Hi folks,
I've just updated the docs-build-system and added a check for it to the xslt
styles. So if you get an error when building the docs saying, your build
system is out-of-date, just do an svn update on the build directory and try
again.
nd
--
Die Untergeschosse der Sempergalerie
/trunk/docs/manual/mod/core.xml.de
I'm sorry, what is that? These changes for the german translation are crap
(broken automatic translations?!)
I'm going to revert that now.
nd
--
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
q...@{[reverse split/::/ =__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http
* Rich Bowen wrote:
Is there any particular reason *not* to have docs-build as an svn
external under the docs/manual directory?
(It's about 12M while the entire httpd-trunk checkout is 223M, so it's
about a 5% size increase.)
IIRC just that. Most developers (committer or not) don't need
+#/;$_=(join''=map{chr(ord( # André Malo ;
$_)-1)}split//=$_[0]).$_[1];s s.*s$_see; # http://pub.perlig.de/ ;
in the first place.
nd
--
die (eval q-qq[Just Another Perl Hacker
]
;-)
# André Malo, http://pub.perlig.de/ #
* Rich Bowen wrote:
A FAQ on the various httpd support channels is how do I make the
query string go away. The answer is that you put ? on the end of
the target URL, which is a bit of a kludge.
-1 from the peanut gallery. I think, using an empty query string (?) is
not such a kludge and
!Xibu)%*|qsjou#Kvtu!A`#~tvc!KBQI!)*|~
tvc!ifmm)%*|#Qfsm!A`#~tvc!jt)%*|(Ibdlfs(~ # What the hell is JAPH? ;
@_=split/\s\s+#/;$_=(join''=map{chr(ord( # André Malo ;
$_)-1)}split//=$_[0]).$_[1];s s.*s$_see; # http://pub.perlig.de/ ;
* Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
André Malo wrote:
* Philip M. Gollucci wrote:
Hi all,
I sent a message on Friday from my $work address by mistake (yes, I
should add it to the allow list), but it hasn't been moderated through
yet.
As I understand it, the list is not moderated anymore
* Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 09/25/2009 02:38 PM, n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: nd
Date: Fri Sep 25 12:38:45 2009
New Revision: 818836
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=818836view=rev
Log:
propose another export
Modified:
httpd/httpd/branches/2.2.x/STATUS
Modified:
* n...@apache.org wrote:
static void register_hooks(apr_pool_t *p)
{
ap_hook_fixups(fixup_dir,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_LAST);
+ap_hook_fixups(fixup_dflt,NULL,NULL,APR_HOOK_LAST);
}
module AP_MODULE_DECLARE_DATA dir_module = {
Without further checking: should we ensure the
* Graham Dumpleton wrote:
Is Apache capable of hosting sites with a unicode host name? Is it
just a matter of listing the IDNA(RFC3490) variant of the name in
ServerName or ServerAlias?
Is this the only way it can be done or if configuration files are
written as UTF-8, could the host name
#
[ $japh =~ /{(.)}/] - [0] = map $_ - () #André Malo #
= @japh;# http://pub.perlig.de/ #
* Nick Kew wrote:
On 8 Jan 2009, at 10:34, Joe Orton wrote:
I don't see why 504 is more appropriate than 500 for this case.
504 is specifically defined for cases where the server is acting as a
gateway or proxy, which it is not here. (by the 2616 definitions of
gateway and proxy)
there
was one a year ago ;-)
I'm gonna remove this line.
Thanks, nd
--
print Just Another Perl Hacker;
# André Malo, http://www.perlig.de/ #
* Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/27/2008 04:07 PM, André Malo wrote:
* Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 12/26/2008 10:41 PM, n...@apache.org wrote:
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729538view=rev
Hm. Why this rather complex approach with the request_status hook?
Why not doing
* n...@apache.org wrote:
Author: nd
Date: Fri Dec 26 14:03:12 2008
New Revision: 729543
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=729543view=rev
Log:
update transformation
Modified:
httpd/httpd/tags/2.0.63/docs/manual/bind.xml.meta
[..]
Now that was committed in the wrong location.
* William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Paul Querna wrote:
The change fixed velocity.apache.org, but broke www.apache.org.
All of this sub-request + output filter stuff started in r620133 kinda
needs some more thought.
My thought is that fast_internal_subrequest (which I last refactored, but
* Takashi Sato wrote:
In trunk these files are missing [...]
Go ahead. You don't need to ask for that ;)
nd
--
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
[EMAIL PROTECTED] split/::/ =__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http://www.perlig.de #
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: chrisd
Date: Fri Oct 31 13:18:07 2008
New Revision: 709553
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=709553view=rev
Log:
Add AuthType of None to support disabling authentication.
Prevent crash when provider alias created to provider which is not
yet
* Paul Querna wrote:
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
This does not work on ANSI C compilers. Declarations need to be at the
start of the block.
Then lets not support them.
C90 required that variable decls came before code, but IIRC C99 style
mid-function declarations should work on pretty much
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: martin
Date: Mon Jun 23 01:26:22 2008
New Revision: 670474
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=670474view=rev
Log:
Fix broken link
Modified:
httpd/httpd/trunk/docs/manual/mpm.html.ko.euc-kr
Uhm, you *do* have seen the comment on top saying:
* Ryan Phillips wrote:
Ryan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jeff Trawick [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 9:19 PM, Ryan Phillips
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ryan Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
So I needed to create some mod_rewrite rules only for IPv6 when
httpd
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Date: Fri May 9 06:35:27 2008
New Revision: 654805
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=654805view=rev
Log:
Update doccos
Please update your build system checkout. Yours seems outdated ;)
nd
--
Winnetous Erbe:
* Nick Kew wrote:
On Mon, 31 Mar 2008 22:24:50 +0200
Ruediger Pluem [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
#define CREATE_NODE(pool,name) do { \
-(name) = apr_palloc(pool, sizeof(*(name))); \
-(name)-parent = (name)-left = (name)-right = NULL; \
-
more sense to drop all that seed and rand hassle and just
use the apr-random bytes directly as salt (alphabet[byte % len(alphabet)])
nd
--
package Hacker::Perl::Another::Just;print
[EMAIL PROTECTED] split/::/ =__PACKAGE__]}~;
# André Malo # http://www.perlig.de #
$_ - () #André Malo #
= @japh;# http://pub.perlig.de/ #
* Akins, Brian wrote:
On 1/25/08 3:51 PM, André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't recommend doing that as it contains a race condition (the file
might be changed in the meantime).
That race is in the default_handler as well, isn't it?
Yes. IIRC there's already a bug report
* Akins, Brian wrote:
On 1/25/08 3:33 PM, André Malo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If it should not
be chunked, the backend simply has to provide a content-length along
with the x-sendfile header.
Okay, I add ap_set_content_length(r, sub-finfo.size) and that fixes
it and does not chunk.
I
* Akins, Brian wrote:
I started to play with xsendfile more. I noticed the mod_xsendfile
floating around tried to basically replace what the default handler does
very well.
Basically, my version does a subrequest for the file. This allows things
like Deny from all, etc, to work. This
* Nick Kew wrote:
Our subrequest API currently handles only local subrequests,
so for example mod_include doesn't support
!--#include virtual=http://example.com/example.txt--.
I've worked around this in the past with some ugly hacks.
How ugly are they? I'd rather accept them than...
* Nick Kew wrote:
The main difference is this escaping of ' ' to '+'. The reason for
this is that while ' ' gets encoded as %20 in paths, it gets encoded
as '+' in query strings (afaik for historic reasons). Therefore,
languages which interpret the query string (like PHP) might get
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: niq
Date: Wed Sep 26 07:26:19 2007
New Revision: 579664
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=579664view=rev
Log:
Reinstate location walk for subrequests
PR 41960 (Jose Kahan)
I don't see how the comment matches the patch. We always had location walks
1 - 100 of 495 matches
Mail list logo