Fwd: access grant

I am confused about this. I believe Zsolt is now a member of our "committers" group. Is there another step I need to do to give svn access? If so, what is it? Forwarded Message Subject: access grant Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2016 18:19:33 +0100 From: Zsolt Kúti

Re: Community building: give our User a chance to contribute!

We also need to split tasks out into those that primarily need OpenOffice user skills, and those that require digging deeply into the implementation code. In the long term, I think I may be on the leading edge of a major future source of open software developers - retirees. On 1/14/2017

Re: future of OpenOffice

On 1/10/2017 11:29 PM, Nagy Ákos wrote: Hi, it is impossible, because the LO license is LGPL+MPL, that can't be merged in OpenOffice. That choice of license was very unfortunate, and a regrettable barrier to cooperation between the projects. When LO split off they could have kept the Apache

Re: future of OpenOffice

ore...@tasit.net>: On 11.01.2017 09:44, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 1/10/2017 11:29 PM, Nagy �kos wrote: Hi, it is impossible, because the LO license is LGPL+MPL, that can't be merged in OpenOffice. That choice of license was very unfortunate, and a regrettable barrier to cooperation b

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

I think there is something that comes before this. Developers need to be able to build AOO. I think we still need more work on the step-by-step instructions, making sure they are complete and work for all systems. On 12/3/2016 4:21 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, I thought a little. There

Re: Error on enum statement. Can sombody take a little time and explain the enum and the error?

If this is the 4.1.3 source, it has been compiled many times. I would look for a configuration problem affecting the the value of bits_per_pixel. On 01/02/2017 06:07 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: -Original Message- From: Peter Kovacs [mailto:legi...@gmail.com] Sent: Sunday, January

Re: [GitHub] Missing tag for 4.1.3 release

If it needs to be done early, put it early in the document. In general, what needs doing should drive the form of the "How to Cook a Release" document. If the current form does not accommodate a necessary step, change it. The objective is to have a complete recipe. We currently have two

Re: Save process and files turned to hashes

This issue is my current focus, so the analysis is very valuable and timely. It seems likely that there is a common problem, applying to both documents and profiles, of AOO believing it has finished writing something too early. Unfortunately, I don't think we have any developers who are

Opengrok

Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/, times out. This makes it very unlikely I will be able to solve the RC2 OLE problem before I go out of town for a few days starting on Thursday. I can use find and grep instead, but it takes a lot longer.

Re: Opengrok

at Adfinis SyGroup? Thanks in advance for your help. Marcus Am 15.08.2017 um 19:46 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Opengrok, http://opengrok.adfinis-sygroup.org/source/, times out. This makes it very unlikely I will be able to solve the RC2 OLE problem before I go out of town for a few days starting

Re: Weak reference helper implementations

I have suggested a refactoring pass to make more use of STL structures instead of fixed size, unchecked arrays. Some security problem would be caught by array bounds checking. We have some new volunteers over on the recruitment mailing list. I think refactoring would be a good project for

Re: RC2: OLE problem?

I am rebuilding my 4.1.4 debug environment to make sure it is up to date. I am going to work on this ASAP, but I do have travel planned and will not be available Thursday through Tuesday. On 8/14/2017 1:35 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Well, not exactly the same... If I zoom into the document I

Re: DOC file not opening on 4.1.4

One of the changes for 4.1.4 is supposed to tighten validation of doc files. Unfortunately, I made a mistake in the version that went into RC1, and it gets false positives. The problem should be fixed in RC2. On 8/10/2017 4:27 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: Forum volunteer John_Ha has sent me a

Re: Windows build woes

Have you tried repeating "build --all" a few times? I quite often have failures that go away with a few repeated builds. My interpretation is that whatever is supposed to make sure all dependencies are satisfied before building a module does not quite work right. Sooner or later, everything

Re: Building OO

As another data point, I just did a clean checkout of the trunk and built it on Windows 8.1. Here are my configure parameters: SDK_PATH="/cygdrive/c/Program Files/Microsoft SDKs/Windows/v7.0" ./configure \ --enable-symbols \ --disable-strip-solver \

Re: Building OO

Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.6 compiled on June 29 2015 On 7/20/2017 9:20 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Patricia, could you tell me which version of Apache Ant you are using? Matthias Am 20.07.2017 um 16:02 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: As another data point, I just did a clean checkout of the trunk

Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO)

I use Visual Studio as a debug tool, and sometimes as an editor. I do my builds in a Cygwin shell, following https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10 instructions. I edit using either gvim or Visual Studio depending

Release process

Reminder: Please add the steps that were taken to get Jim able to grant release blocker for 4.1.4 to the "How to Cook a Release" page at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release - To

Re: Windows build woes

Regardless of anything else you do, retry the full build, without cleaning but also without specifying starting from the failure. Sometimes the windows builds don't seem to get all the dependency ordering right. If that is the cause of the failure, repeating the build can resolve it. For

Re: OpenOffice

The OpenOffice name is probably the best asset we have for attracting volunteers. On 5/15/2017 11:26 AM, esh1907 wrote: But for releases and interesting stuff, people are needed ("chicken or the egg")... On Sun, May 14, 2017 at 7:51 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Nah. That

Re: AOO 4.1.4 Cannot access to Options Security macros

I have reproduced the problem in my US English 4.1.4, and also a debug build based on the trunk but with additional 4.1.4 changes. On 6/23/2017 7:01 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi! Confirmed on Windows 7. These builds are primarily meant for testing the build process and the different

Re: AOO 4.1.4 Cannot access to Options Security macros

Would it make sense to put the "official" configuration options in "How to Cook a Release"? It would make it more of a one-stop shop for the release construction information. On 6/23/2017 8:14 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Am 23.06.2017 um 16:44 schrieb Damjan Jovanovic: You don't need the

Re: Bugzilla

On 5/20/2017 7:32 AM, esh1907 wrote: Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during Star and Sun Microsystems to rejoin the project? If you can see a way to make this happen, it would be very helpful. Even having someone familiar with the source code available as a

Re: Security (was bugzilla)

Since this is getting into specifics of security issues, I think it should be moved to the security list. On 5/22/2017 1:22 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Well, I see only 2 attack path for us. Ssh interface and the macro/scripting interface. SSH or web we need to update libs, so wee need a flexible

Re: Bugzilla

On 5/20/2017 1:43 PM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi Patricia Am .05.2017, 22:04 Uhr, schrieb Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>: ... A retired Sun or StarOffice person who understands how the code is put together could save me a lot of time. My current low level objective is to find where

Re: Bugzilla

On 5/20/2017 9:07 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all Am .05.2017, 16:32 Uhr, schrieb esh1907 : Maybe we should try to locate and convince people who used to work during Star and Sun Microsystems to rejoin the project? I think this is the wrong way to go. We can't get the

Re: Failing to build 4.1.4

ar.gz; That source is not existent any more and I had to change to: --with-epm-url=https://sourceforge.net/projects/oooextras.mirror/files/epm-3.7.tar.gz (See: https://wiki.openoffice.org/w/index.php?title=Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO ) Regards, Matthias Am 02.06.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Pat

Failing to build 4.1.4

I checked out 4.1.4, and tried to build it, Windows 8.1. The build fails right at the end. I'm attaching my configure parameters. Any tips for how to fix this? ... unopkg.exe sync --verbose -env:UNO_JAVA_JFW_ENV_JREHOME=true 2>&1 | ... ... creating archive file ... ... cleaning the output tree

Re: Failing to build 4.1.4

Thanks for the suggestions. I am doing a clean build, but it takes a while on Windows 8.1. I have 441 GB of free space on the disk, so I don't think that is the problem. On 6/2/2017 11:02 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 02.06.2017 um 18:51 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I checked out 4.1.4, and tried

Re: Failing to build 4.1.4

The new build, done clean and incorporating Matthias' suggested change, completed successfully. Thanks again for the suggestions. On 6/2/2017 11:20 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: Thanks for the suggestions. I am doing a clean build, but it takes a while on Windows 8.1. I have 441 GB of free

Re: A refactoring proposal

at the screen when building AOO I see a lot of messages that make me think that the code could need a review... Your suggestion sounds very reasonable to me! Kind regards, Matthias Am 17.06.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues

A refactoring proposal

Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues have related to the use of fixed size arrays without bounds checks. In general, that is not a very robust programming practice. It depends on careful checking in the source code to prevent array overflow. I suggest a project

Re: A refactoring proposal

array example: array<Circle,10> myarray so std::array::at is equal to the arrayexample? sorry if the question is dumb. I am not sure if what I know is the same what you talk about. I am in the "early carrier" category. lol. All the best Peter Am 17.06.2017 um 19:52 schrieb Patri

Re: A refactoring proposal

this youtube video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=86xWVb4XIyE And since I learned C++ in the 90ies, but never used it I thought it is a good invest. Am 18.06.2017 um 01:06 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: I don't know. I have not read that particular book. If the code snippet includes "using name

Re: A refactoring proposal

On 6/18/2017 5:51 AM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 06/17/2017 01:52 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: Without going into details here, some recently fixed security issues have related to the use of fixed size arrays without bounds checks. In general, that is not a very robust programming practice

Re: Apache OpenOffice NG

On 5/2/2017 8:42 AM, Jorg Schmidt wrote: From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com] The issue that I see is that our end-user community is not the same as, for example, subversion... I would hazard that the vast majority of AOO users have no idea what "open source" means and the

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

I know Git is the repository-of-the-decade, and therefore a switch to it is probably inevitable, just like the switch from RCS to SCCS and from SCCS to Subversion. Just as a matter of curiosity, which IDE's do not support Subversion? I know I was using a it with Eclipse before I heard of Git.

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

I would like to add one more condition: We should not move until the process we will use has been applied successfully to smaller projects. I am relatively neutral on the choice of repository, and a lot of people seem to like Git. On 9/14/2017 11:16 AM, Marcus wrote: Even when I'm not a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Availability of AOO-4.1.4 RC4

I installed the en-GB binary on a Windows 10 machine. Its spell checker wants me to drop the "u" from "colour". Is there something else I have to do to make it really en-GB? On 9/22/2017 10:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Available for immediate testing are the source tarballs/zips and community

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Availability of AOO-4.1.4 RC4

Tools - Language - For all Text - Reset to Default Language makes it accept "colour". Shouldn't it start out in the default language on installation? On 9/23/2017 2:38 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I installed the en-GB binary on a Windows 10 machine. Its spell checker wants me to d

Re: [Discussion] Switch to Git?

On 9/17/2017 9:04 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: On 14/09/2017 Dave Fisher wrote: does SVN vs. GIT prevent new developers from volunteering? I think this is the key question, even though there are many good points also in what others replied. We currently have a couple semi-official GIT

Re: Reported OLE issue w/ RC2

That specific bug has already been tested. It is a symptom of the unfortunate fact that what I don't know about the AOO source code can hurt us, in the form of unexpected regressions. The more different testing, the better. Linked files are the general area that should be hit most, but any

Re: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 crashes on Mac

On 10/4/2017 3:03 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: ... I've just tried this on another Mac, with the very same operating system, and it works. I need to wait until later today to retry on the other machine, let's say in 6 hours from now. ... Given this, and the other reports of it working on Macs,

Re: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 crashes on Mac

AM, Roberto Galoppini <roberto.galopp...@gmail.com wrote: I've re-downloaded again, it does not work. Does anyone else have tried that? I'm really the only one facing problem with this build? 2017-10-03 15:04 GMT+02:00 Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>: Did you happen to check keys o

Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

The equivalent of this patch for my debug environment does fix the labels problem. On 10/10/2017 3:28 AM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I have a theory for the Labels issue, and am in the process of building to test it. On an extremely experimental, untested, basis I am attaching a candidate fix

Re: 4.1.4 RC4: synchronize labels don't work on MacOS

Thanks for the report. I have reproduced the problem in my Windows 8.1 debug environment, based on trunk but with some 4.1.4 changes added. I need to get some more sleep before serious debug (it is 2:08 a.m. here). Could someone check whether it happens in the unmodified trunk? That would

Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

section 5. Tools… → Update → Links or Tools… → Update → Update All => Nothing happens. :-( Regards, Mathias Am 10.10.2017 um 11:10 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Thanks for the report. I have reproduced the problem in my Windows 8.1 debug environment, based on trunk but with some 4.1.4 changes added

Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

onsidering this issue, this means that 4.1.4 is also DOA. I will wait for a few more hours, for West Coast to get online but my plan is to start the process for AOO-415 On Oct 10, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: The attached patch fixes this, as well as the business c

Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

for AOO-415 On Oct 10, 2017, at 8:16 AM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: The attached patch fixes this, as well as the business card case. On 10/10/2017 2:59 AM, Mathias Röllig wrote: Hello! Even on Linux. Problem: linked sections will not be updated if the original section is c

Re: 4.1.4 show stopper!

rds, Mathias Am 10.10.2017 um 11:10 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Thanks for the report. I have reproduced the problem in my Windows 8.1 debug environment, based on trunk but with some 4.1.4 changes added. I need to get some more sleep before serious debug (it is 2:08 a.m. here). Could someone ch

Re: Resigning as RM for 4.1.x

I hope you will stay on. I am not sure I would have made the same decision as you about the release number, but in my opinion part of the RM role is bike-shedding prevention by making decisions. I hope that the need to test the patch ASAP does not get lost in the discussion of what to call

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

Based on my own testing, I was about to cast a binding +1, but I'm going to hold my vote until we know more about this. On 10/14/2017 3:36 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: -1 (non binding) Get general error message (macOS High Sierra) every time I open a document. See separate post for details

Strange behavior of Spellcheck

On my Windows 10 machine, Spellcheck defaults to en-US spelling, regardless of the language of the installation. I have tested this with both fr and en-GB. (French and the two variants of English are the only languages I know well enough to test.) For each document, I have to specify the

Re: Strange behavior of Spellcheck

On 10/14/2017 2:24 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Patricia Shanahan wrote: On my Windows 10 machine, Spellcheck defaults to en-US spelling, regardless of the language of the installation. I have tested this with both fr and en-GB. (French and the two variants of English are the only languages I

Re: AOO 4.1.4 – Error message

Good catch! Would it make sense to test with expat-2.2.4? On 10/17/2017 3:48 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Good news... I think. For some reason, it does look like the expat patch is the root cause, but for the life of me I can't grok why. With the RC4 version of expat-2.2.3.patch, RC5 works on

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

-1, binding The macOS problem seems to me to be sufficiently serious that we cannot release RC5 with it. It has now been reported by two different users. I may change my vote based on future information. (If I were considering only my Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 testing, my vote would be +1)

Re: AOO 4.1.4 – Error message

As a test, would it be possible for a Mac developer to rebuild with the source code for RC5 but the process and libraries from RC4, and/or the other way round? That will tell us whether the problem is a source code change or a build process change. On 10/16/2017 11:33 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:

Re: Opengrok

Would Opengrok be out of service during the "remove all branches" phase? If so, for how long? On 9/5/2017 3:04 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi, maybe it would be nice to have a small script that runs once a day that just removes all branches and set them up which it finds. It would remove the

Re: How to make a new include work

this? What did you do in the end? Thanks the Information! :-D Am Montag, den 28.08.2017, 12:18 -0700 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Looks interesting. An include I needed from sfx2 worked just fine, so I'll make sc look the same way in that file. On 8/28/2017 12:12 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: sry

Re: Fwd: FOSDEM Apache Developer Room ?

On 9/5/2017 3:42 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: ... Can we make an OpenOffice meetup like last year? I mean it was great to meet new people. If we announce this a little then maybe more people come. Of course I would be happy to see those I already have met again. ... If there is an OpenOffice meetup

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Availability of AOO-4.1.4 RC4

23/09/2017 22:38, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I installed the en-GB binary on a Windows 10 machine. Its spell checker wants me to drop the "u" from "colour". Is there something else I have to do to make it really en-GB? On 9/22/2017 10:51 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Avail

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Availability of AOO-4.1.4 RC4

I have completed the minimum testing I need to cast a binding +1 vote for RC4, including successfully compiling and testing from the source tarball as well as installing and testing a couple of binaries. I will, of course, continue testing until the decision is made. On 9/22/2017 10:51 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 as GA

+1 (binding) On 9/30/2017 12:54 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I am calling a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 as GA!! You can find these gems at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC4/ The vote will last at least the normal 72 hours. Cheers! -- Jim Jagielski

Re: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 crashes on Mac

Do you do anything in particular, such as open some type of document, before it crashes? On 10/3/2017 12:28 AM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: I was trying to test Apache_OpenOffice_4.1.4_MacOS_x86-64_install_en-US.dmg but I couldn't, it keeps crashing. Best, Roberto

Re: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 crashes on Mac

t;j...@jagunet.com>: How do you open it? Dbl-click the Icon? Select it and choose Open? Alt-click Open? On Oct 3, 2017, at 5:51 AM, Roberto Galoppini < roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote: It never launched, actually. It crashes before anything else. 2017-10-03 11:24 GMT+02:00 Patricia

Re: Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC4 crashes on Mac

wrote: I've re-downloaded again, it does not work. Does anyone else have tried that? I'm really the only one facing problem with this build? 2017-10-03 15:04 GMT+02:00 Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org>: Did you happen to check keys or do a sumcheck on the download? This is sounding like it

Re: AAO writer RC-2

Thanks for this report. I am working on another bug so I can't get to it immediately. It would be helpful to get as much characterization as possible. Does it happen on other operating systems? How many styles are necessary to reproduce the bug? On 8/26/2017 10:39 PM, Greg Madden wrote:

How to make a new include work

I need to include main/sc/inc/document.hxx in main/sfx2/source/view/frmload.cxx. It is proving surprisingly difficult - there seems to be some copying of header files??? Any suggestions? What should the include line look like? Do I need to run configure and/or bootstrap again?

Re: How to make a new include work

/pch \     -I$(WORKDIR)/SdiTarget/sfx2/sdi \     -I$(WORKDIR)/inc/ \     $$(INCLUDE) \     -I$(OUTDIR)/inc/offuh \     -I$(OUTDIR)/inc \     $(LIBXML_CFLAGS) \ But maybe my understanding on including is wrong :-) All the best Peter On 28.08.2017 19:41, Patricia Shanahan wrote: I need to include

Re: AAO writer RC-2

wrote: Maybe Gregg could create a test document and send us a link? I would be interested to test it on Windows and Ubuntu. Also, as it happens in Writer it could be related to the other bug. Regards, Matthias Am 27.08.2017 um 12:35 schrieb Patricia Shanahan: Thanks for this report. I am

Re: [Discussion] build tool

On 9/5/2017 7:11 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hello all, To be honest I am not very happy with gmake and ant. It is difficult to add the functionality to Eclipse. Also we stay dependant for Windows on Cygwin or Windows Subsystem for Linux, which feels to me awkward. Also if we want to have people

Re: 4.5.0? (Was: Re: AOO 4.2.0 and macOS)

On 10/10/2017 11:49 AM, Marcus wrote: Am 10.10.2017 um 01:15 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: Jim Jagielski wrote: I was wondering... what do people think about going from 4.1.x all the way straight to 4.5.0... Since this next "major" release is pretty major, maybe a bigger step in number might be

Re: New macOS builds available (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA)

Yeah! What is the test and vote procedure from this point? I've checked the commit messages, and none of the files I used in my testing have changed, so I do not see any need to repeat it. On the other hand, we need to allow time for Mac users to retest. On 10/17/2017 8:52 AM, Jim Jagielski

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

no changes to the files I used in my testing, so no need to retest. On 10/16/2017 12:45 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote: -1, binding The macOS problem seems to me to be sufficiently serious that we cannot release RC5 with it. It has now been reported by two different users. I may change my vote based

Re: New macOS builds available (Was: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA)

Does this call for a change to https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Mac_OS_X to prevent it in the future? On 10/17/2017 12:09 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: Matthias Seidel wrote: (Later) I would be interested if your changes in the build process would

Which conference?

In my experience face-to-face meetings help smooth e-mail communication. I live in California but many of the AOO developers seem to be based in Europe, so my best chance of meeting some of you is to attend a European open source conference. I would like to decide at least a couple of months

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

In general, we are documenting our release process in https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/How+to+Cook+a+Release. We have a problem that the ASF itself documents the rules for voting on releases in two places: http://www.apache.org/legal/release-policy.html#release-approval

Re: Which conference?

On 10/17/2017 1:38 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:27:34 +0200 Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: Patricia Shanahan wrote: I am currently considering FOSDEM 2018, but is there a better choice? No better choice. It is confirmed there will be a Devroom fo

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 10/18/2017 3:39 PM, Carl Marcum wrote: On 10/18/2017 03:11 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: We expect PMC members to have a deep sense of responsibility to their projects. When they cast a binding vote, we trust that they have satisfied themselves enough to warrant them casting the vote. That,

Re: [VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache OpenOffice 4.1.4-RC5 as GA

On 10/18/2017 12:28 PM, Pedro Lino wrote: On 18/10/2017 19:02, Andrea Pescetti wrote: This is OK as long as the Apache Policy doesn't get in the way too much... I mean, I highly appreciate when people provide a list of what they did to justify their +1. But this shouldn't be used "against"

Re: QA Improvements on 4.2.0

I like all this. In addition, I would like to get set up to do code review. I don't like the idea of changes going out to millions of users having only been seriously examined by one programmer - even if I'm that programmer. For both code review and testing, we need more active developers in

Re: Issue for 4.1.4 and MacOS

Since the issue appeared in 4.1.4, and involves document links, it might be related to my changes. I do not have a Mac, and do not have any Mac debug experience. How do people think we should proceed with this? Is there a Mac developer who can work with me on it? On 10/24/2017 4:40 AM,

Re: Issue for 4.1.4 and MacOS

On 10/24/2017 5:49 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote: On Tue, 24 Oct 2017 05:35:34 -0700 Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: Since the issue appeared in 4.1.4, and involves document links, it might be related to my changes. I do not have a Mac, and do not have any Mac debug experience.

Re: Simpler Windows builds, oowintool, and Cygwin64

I've been waiting for the dust to settle. What is the best set of instructions for doing a Windows 10 build with Cygwin 64? On 11/15/2017 7:47 AM, Matthias Seidel wrote: Hi Damjan, I added 2 trailing "/" and now it works... ;-) Maybe Patricia can confirm it? I will now start a build from

Re: another bug in base

On 11/27/2017 7:07 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 26 Nov, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 11/26/2017 4:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with: FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 Target: x86_64-unknown

Re: Fwd: [Issue 127600] AOO 4.1.4 : Creating labels on more than One page freezes application

it, etc. Referencing 4.1.5 is about the same as referencing a "dev" build, but additional info on how/why it got fixed would be helpful. Was it. Fixed on trunk and then ported to 4.1.5 or ??? MzK On Nov 25, 2017 05:51, "Patricia Shanahan" <p...@acm.org> wro

Re: Jim's Windows7 issues solved!?

: Yeah, I'll update the build instructions as needed. On Nov 22, 2017, at 11:17 PM, Patricia Shanahan <p...@acm.org> wrote: Do we need an update to the instructions to clarify that? On 11/22/2017 12:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I think I finally tracked down the problem w/ my Win7/cygwin

Re: another bug in base

On 11/26/2017 4:47 PM, Don Lewis wrote: On 27 Nov, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: I can't reproduce it here, on trunk with: FreeBSD clang version 3.4.1 (tags/RELEASE_34/dot1-final 208032) 20140512 Target: x86_64-unknown-freebsd10.3 with either our built-in HSQLDB driver or SQlite over ODBC. What

Re: Jim's Windows7 issues solved!?

Do we need an update to the instructions to clarify that? On 11/22/2017 12:34 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I think I finally tracked down the problem w/ my Win7/cygwin build problems. It was subtle. I kept all my sources in /home/jim/src/asf/AOO415 that is, it lived under the cygwin

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

I see 4.1.5-dev as a device for testing whether a bug is due to a specific problem. That change is already checked in to the trunk. We still have to decide whether to go straight to 4.2.0. The upside is, as Damjam points out, that we need to get the general benefits of 4.2 out in the field.

Re: security fixes in trunk

The changes must not be committed as is, because that would undo some comment translation. I have built a modified trunk and plan to test it today. If all goes well I'll commit later today. On 11/30/2017 7:38 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: Thx! Looking over, I does appear to me that these need to

Re: security fixes in trunk

Thanks. I'll do a detailed analysis. On 11/27/2017 7:44 PM, Don Lewis wrote: When I diff the files that were changed for security reasons in 4.1.4 (this is actually 4.1.5 since I have a fresh checkout handy) vs. the same files in trunk, and throw out all the diff chunks that solely contain

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

On 11/24/2017 8:23 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: On Nov 23, 2017, at 6:06 PM, Larry Gusaas wrote: There are serious regressions in 4.1.4 for Macs. The fix needs to be released now, not wait until 4.2.0 And at least 1 fix that address all platforms as well, so I do

Fwd: [Issue 127600] AOO 4.1.4 : Creating labels on more than One page freezes application

Should bugs be being marked "FIXED" based on the 4.1.5-dev build? We have not yet committed to releasing it. Forwarded Message Subject: [Issue 127600] AOO 4.1.4 : Creating labels on more than One page freezes application Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2017 13:48:42 + From:

Re: AOO 4.1.5-dev builds

I don't think we should wait for more development before releasing fixes for the 4.1.4 regressions. If 4.2.0 needs another month or so of development, I'm in favor of releasing 4.1.5 as soon as we can get the various bug reports checked against it. On a side note, for those living outside the

Re: a more sane way to override optimization flags in gbuild

I would put it a bit more strongly. I think 4.1.x should be strictly reserved for changes that are essential to fix urgent user-visible bugs. On 11/30/2017 5:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I think for 4.2.x and later, we have deprecated CentOS5 as a supported build system... I ran into a LOT of

Re: [PROPOSAL] Public Beta for 4.2

and build a last production version and that will be voted on. By this we have simple names, every one can follow, plus we do not break our work process. All the best Peter Am 3. Dezember 2017 18:40:23 MEZ schrieb Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com>: On Dec 3, 2017, at 10:06 AM, Patricia Shana

Re: [VOTE] Release AOO 4.1.5-RC1 as GA

+1 (binding) On 12/18/2017 5:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: I am calling a VOTE on releasing Apache OpenOffice 4.1.5-RC1 as GA!! You can find these gems at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.5-RC1/ The vote will last at least the normal 72 hours. Cheers! -- Jim

Re: Dont understand Compiler message

I sometimes get similar messages that go away if I just rerun the build. I think there may be some problem in whatever is supposed to ensure dependencies are built before the things that depend on them. On 11/12/2017 4:24 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: | | |My Compile setup:| || ./configure  

Fwd: [Issue 127601] New: DDE Fields

This should be tested on 4.1.5-dev. Is there going to be a Windows build? Forwarded Message Subject: [Issue 127601] New: DDE Fields Date: Mon, 20 Nov 2017 21:21:43 + From: bugzi...@apache.org Reply-To: iss...@openoffice.apache.org To: iss...@openoffice.apache.org

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >