Re: [Shale-Spring] update to 2.0.1 ?

2007-04-24 Thread Sean Schofield
+1 for updating to Java 1.5. Obviously we need to be clear in the docs. Sean On 4/20/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: :) On 4/20/07, Mario Ivankovits [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Matthias Wessendorf wrote: Later than expected, but my hard disk crashed, I am days behind my

Re: See You In Amsterdam?

2007-02-10 Thread Sean Schofield
on Saturday night so I'd love to try and get together with you before the conference starts. Email me offlist and we can make a plan. Sean On 2/2/07, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: how long are you staying in Europe, Sean ? wanna see Germany ? On 2/2/07, Sean Schofield [EMAIL

Re: [jira] Resolved: (SHALE-334) API links broken on Shale View Controller site

2006-11-22 Thread Sean Schofield
Fixed a couple of links to javadocs on the index page, plus a relative reference to the test framework. Feel free to reopen if you find any more, but *please* be specific about where the links are. Sorry. All of the API links that I checked were broken so I assumed the problem was a general

Dialog navigation woes

2006-11-15 Thread Sean Schofield
I'm trying to use the new dialog stuff in a production app. Previously I had only been using dialogs in popup windows (with no browser back buttons to worry about.) Now I think I'm running into the same problems as Rahul and others have reported. I will describe my usecase where I think the

Re: Dialog navigation woes

2006-11-15 Thread Sean Schofield
IIRC, you filed some RFE requests against dialog for a similar use case, and we listened :-). You can fake a restart by programmatically stopping the current dialog, and then programmatically starting a new one. Does that do the trick for you? I guess this means an action method that returns

Re: Site perms

2006-11-14 Thread Sean Schofield
Is everyone ok with permissions now? Sean On 11/7/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/7/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 11/7/06, James Mitchell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: No, I haven't run anything from my machine in about 6 months. The nightlies for Struts

Re: How are Tiger Annotations enabled?

2006-10-24 Thread Sean Schofield
Hmm ... there are at least the following prerequisites for this to work: * The shale-view-xxx.jar file contains a tag library that, among other things, includes a listener declaration that sets up the basics and (if the Tiger extensions are also in the webapp) does the Tiger-specific

[OT] Google Code Search

2006-10-24 Thread Sean Schofield
I just found out about this[1]. You can now search public SVN and CVS repositories. Pretty cool. Sean [1]http://www.google.com/codesearch

Re: svn commit: r465991 - in /shale/framework/trunk: shale-application/src/site/ shale-application/src/site/xdoc/ shale-apps/src/site/ shale-clay/src/site/ shale-core/src/site/ shale-remoting/src/site

2006-10-20 Thread Sean Schofield
Nice work. The website is much improved! On 10/20/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/19/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 10/19/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: NOTE -- I am not deleting the now-obsolete feature-xxx.xml pages yet ... that needs

Release docs

2006-10-19 Thread Sean Schofield
We should probably make clear in the next release about how there is a new shale-application project and that you will need to change your pom.xml (to add a new dependency) and web.xml (to reflect the new listener package name). This tripped me up on my own app. Of course it was easy to fix

Re: Shale-related Tiles 2 issue - solved but not pretty

2006-10-07 Thread Sean Schofield
Yes AFAIK the latest Tomahawk will work with the RI. I've been out of the loop on the mailing lists for a few weeks so I could be wrong on that though. Sean On 10/4/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Oct 3, 2006, at 7:01 PM, Gregg Leichtman wrote: I'm in the process of setting up

Re: [PROPOSAL] Migrate Dialog2 Support From Sandbox To Framework

2006-10-02 Thread Sean Schofield
+1 On 9/29/06, Greg Reddin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 On Sep 28, 2006, at 8:41 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote: The work we've done on the dialog support in the sandbox is showing clear earmarks of success. We can now support 100% of the functionality that actually works in the original

Re: Shale home page

2006-09-25 Thread Sean Schofield
Not volunteering here but I definitely think we could streamline things so that its easier to navigate. IMO we have too much crammed onto that first page. sean On 9/25/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Someone on IRC brought up a good point about the Shale home page: We don't say what

Re: Objection to (part of) r440205

2006-09-24 Thread Sean Schofield
Craig, I'm a little confused. What is the difference between returning null and delegating to the wrapped navigation handler, which in the case of the default implementation, will also return null? I guess in most cases I can think of the dialog as the only thing that should be handling

Re: Can't seem to get Dialog2NavigationHandler working

2006-09-03 Thread Sean Schofield
definitions (its telling me the dialog doesn't exist.) I created a new issue on this, SHALE-271 sean On 9/1/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/1/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The nav handler is in fact declared and the classname seems correct to me

Re: Can't seem to get Dialog2NavigationHandler working

2006-09-03 Thread Sean Schofield
Two things -- first, how recent are the bits you're using? I've been making *lots* of changes through yesterday (a fun way to spend the commercials while Oregon was whomping on Stanford :-), and the legacy implementation now works for me. I've also checked in a test app

Can't seem to get Dialog2NavigationHandler working

2006-09-01 Thread Sean Schofield
I can't seem to get Dialog2NavigationHandler working properly (I'm using the 1.2 RI.) It appears that the faces-config.xml in the jar file is beaing read based on this: 2006-09-01 14:27:11,587 [main] INFO org.apache.myfaces.config.FacesConfigurator - Reading config

Re: Can't seem to get Dialog2NavigationHandler working

2006-09-01 Thread Sean Schofield
The nav handler is in fact declared and the classname seems correct to me. That was the first thing I checked. Have you run an actual dialog yet or are you still in the just getting things to compile stage? Sean On 9/1/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 9/1/06, Sean Schofield

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-31 Thread Sean Schofield
On 8/28/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've checked in some progress on my experiments with how we can improve the Dialog functionality. Even though they're not done yet, they are far enough along to want some feedback and to make them available for experimentation and further

Re: [dialog] Progress on weekend experiments

2006-08-31 Thread Sean Schofield
a reference to Contexts? Its currently not being used. No big deal - I know its the sandbox - but did you have something in mind for this reference? Off to create a few test dialogs. I will report back shortly. Sean On 8/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/28/06, Craig McClanahan

Re: [dialog] Using SCXML to describe Shale dialogs

2006-08-25 Thread Sean Schofield
I have few initial concerns after looking over the excellent documentation and examples on the Commons SCXML site. So far, my concerns are as follows: 1.) I'm not wild about having to run an XSL transform on dialogs during compile time but the SCXML approach to configuring dialogs seems to

Re: [dialog] className attribute

2006-08-25 Thread Sean Schofield
@Sean - I take it you are using this attribute? Any ideas here? Can you please explain (again) how you use it? There may be other ways to achieve the desired results, from an SCXML PoV. Ofcourse, that will only be applicable for new applications. Basically there were a bunch of shortcoming in

Re: [dialog] How to use a common view with different dialog managed beans?

2006-08-25 Thread Sean Schofield
I think Paul was commenting on an earlier idea that I had about scrapping #{dialog.data} in favor of a managed bean type solution. If I'm reading his message correctly he raises some good points. I think we're past that idea now though in favor of keeping #{dialog.data} but no longer blowing

Re: Review Core JSF coverage of Shale dialogs?

2006-08-24 Thread Sean Schofield
When's the book supposed to be published? For those who are anxious to learn JSF and can't wait for the 2nd edition, I suggest you get the first edition now! I wish I had it way back when I was first trying to understand JSF. I'm happy to review the whole book if you need a reviewer. Sean On

Re: [Invitation To Design Discussion] - The Shale Dialog Manager Feature

2006-08-23 Thread Sean Schofield
I'm ready to start contributing. Craig already has a pretty good start on the wiki. My plan is to add a few features ideas to the wiki and also to post those features ideas here for discussion. Sean On 8/23/06, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/21/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL

Re: Handling JIRA issues tagged with 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT

2006-08-22 Thread Sean Schofield
Isn't this the same set of issues you just changed to Unknown in step 2? If so, how do you find them again? Step 2 is *unresolved* issues. Basically you don't want any issues to be on a 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT roadmap since there is no such thing anymore. So you change the fix version to unknown and

Re: Nightly build problem

2006-08-21 Thread Sean Schofield
Everything seems to be builidng correctly now. Initially I was also having trouble building locally so I think it was an issue with ibiblio. Sean On 8/20/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It seems like there is a problem with the nightly builds[1.] From the logs it looks like

Re: [VOTE] Shale Version 1.0.3 Release

2006-08-21 Thread Sean Schofield
+1 (Binding) On 8/20/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: At long last :-), the bits are ready for a vote. All of the following files have md5 and sha1 checksums, and are in addition signed by my code signing key. They correspond to revision 433108 in the SVN repository, which I'm

Re: Handling JIRA issues tagged with 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT

2006-08-21 Thread Sean Schofield
I'll take care of this and update the wiki with the steps necessary. Sean On 8/21/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/21/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Create a new version 1.0.3 * Bulk change of issues tagged 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT to 1.0.3, turning off email

Re: Handling JIRA issues tagged with 1.0.3-SNAPSHOT

2006-08-21 Thread Sean Schofield
on issues that were *reported* against a SNAPSHOT version yet it prevents you from reporting new issues against the SNAPSHOT. Sean On 8/21/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll take care of this and update the wiki with the steps necessary. Sean On 8/21/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL

Re: Test 1.0.3 Artifacts (Round 2)

2006-08-20 Thread Sean Schofield
We can tweak the procedure next time ... but for this time I'm going to try to role the final set of bits to propose for the vote this evening. Can we please hold up on commits until after I finish that, tag it, and update the POMs for 1.0.4-SNAPSHOT? That will work. Craig Sean

Re: Tiger (annotations) + Facelets

2006-08-10 Thread Sean Schofield
Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Facelets and Tiger annotations work fine for me. I'm not using the view controller stuff yet (@Init) but @Bean and @Property work fine for me. As soon as I finish refactoring for the new package names I will check into shale-goodies. Sean On 8/7/06, Sean

Re: Confluence Wiki Anyone?

2006-08-09 Thread Sean Schofield
So there would be 2 wikis? One for official documenation (confluence) and one for community based documentation (current)? To me the current Shale website is a bit overwhelming with information. I like the idea of moving all of the getting started docs to confluence and organizing them by

Re: Confluence Wiki Anyone?

2006-08-09 Thread Sean Schofield
Another topic of concern was allowing people who have not been granted committer status the ability to edit the official documentation for a project. We could limit this to just committers like we do now for the website (where the docs are now.) Ideally we could add people by invitation and

Re: Confluence Wiki Anyone?

2006-08-09 Thread Sean Schofield
On the other hand, anyone I am willing to trust with the web content is also someone I would trust with repository access :-). We should probably stick to the current Apache way whenever possible. Its not worth adding such a distinction if it gets us sidetracked from our main business. Better

Re: Tiger (annotations) + Facelets

2006-08-08 Thread Sean Schofield
Facelets and Tiger annotations work fine for me. I'm not using the view controller stuff yet (@Init) but @Bean and @Property work fine for me. As soon as I finish refactoring for the new package names I will check into shale-goodies. Sean On 8/7/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm

Re: SHALE-219 -- Still want it for 1.0.3?

2006-08-08 Thread Sean Schofield
1.0.3 is going to be another alpha/beta release right? We still need to fix the dialog issues such as SHALE-48 before we go legit right? I'm assuming the goal is to have a solid 1.0.4 release just before Apache Con no? If so, then I imagine we're going to be busy in September. My personal

Re: Tiger (annotations) + Facelets

2006-08-07 Thread Sean Schofield
I'm about to add the annotations stuff to my petstore app (which uses facelets) so I will let you know what I find shortly. Sean On 8/6/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: not only @Bean(...) also @Init public void myInit() { System.out.println(getClass()); _name =

Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-04 Thread Sean Schofield
Yep. What we would need to know is the from address on the commit emails, so we know what address to subscribe. I changed the email from public to moderated so I could discover the sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You'd think Google would have figured this stuff out already :-). Yes but its a

Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-04 Thread Sean Schofield
Lets think on the package names a bit. OK. What about just org.shale? So for petstore we have org.shale.petstore as the package name with org.shale as the maven group name. Craig Sean

Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-04 Thread Sean Schofield
On Aug 4, 2006, at 2:03 PM, James Mitchell wrote: I prefer com.google.shalegoodies Your thoughts? -- James Mitchell 678.910.8017 On Aug 4, 2006, at 11:30 AM, Sean Schofield wrote: Lets think on the package names a bit. OK. What about just org.shale? So for petstore we have

Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-04 Thread Sean Schofield
shale.goodies.petstore ? I like it except for one problem. What is the maven group id? If it starts with shale, people browsing ibiblio might get confused and wonder where the rest of the stuff is? Wendy Sean

Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-03 Thread Sean Schofield
Anyone know if we can we use photos and descriptions from the wikipedia for the petstore example? Sean

Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-03 Thread Sean Schofield
Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that? Sean On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone know if we can we use photos and descriptions from

Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-03 Thread Sean Schofield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Most of the images seem to be: GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2. What about the text? Any ideas on that? Are you asking about the text on Wikipedia? There's

Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-03 Thread Sean Schofield
I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release artifacts as different versions, etc. I'm assuming that's the case. I think we're all curious about the google option so lets go ahead with it. We can always move it in a few months if it doesn't pan out. Right now there;s just

Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-03 Thread Sean Schofield
Any reason why we can't use org.apache.shale for the package names still? I can't really think of a better package name off hand. Sean On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm ok with shale-goodies as long as we can release

Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-03 Thread Sean Schofield
Lets think on the package names a bit. I set up a google group for us. I tried adding the svn commit messages to the group but I'm not sure that's possible. Maybe we just add each commiter manually as we go? Sean On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield

Re: Should we move shale-petstore somewhere else? Was -- Re: Wikipedia: More Licensing Questions

2006-08-03 Thread Sean Schofield
to switch back to the other model if we changed our mind. I'm not sure where I stand on this. What does the rest of the group think? Sean On 8/3/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 8/3/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lets think on the package names a bit. OK. I set up

Upgraded MyFaces Dependency to 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT

2006-07-31 Thread Sean Schofield
I changed the MyFaces dependency in Shale to 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT. Tomahawk 1.1.4-SNAPSHOT (used by the new shale-petstore) will not work properly using the old 1.1.1 dependency. Please rebuild the shale framework before attempting to build shale-petstore or you will inject the old 1.1.1 jars into

[petstore] Need Hibernate Help

2006-07-31 Thread Sean Schofield
I checked in the beginnings of the shale-petstore app. Unfortunately hibernate is giving me some weird results. I have a category: dogs and a subcategory: terriers. When asking for the inventory, Hibernate is giving me back the correct hiearchy, plus an additional top level node for terriers.

Re: svn commit: r427223 - /shale/sandbox/shale-petstore/pom.xml

2006-07-31 Thread Sean Schofield
According to the facelets site (section 1.2) the EL RI is also needed for facelets[1]. That's probably why I am getting the following stack trace: SEVERE: Error Rendering View[/welcome.xhtml] com.sun.facelets.FaceletException: Could not instantiate feature[compiler.ExpressionFactory]:

Re: svn commit: r427223 - /shale/sandbox/shale-petstore/pom.xml

2006-07-31 Thread Sean Schofield
, at 3:16 PM, Sean Schofield wrote: According to the facelets site (section 1.2) the EL RI is also needed for facelets[1]. That's probably why I am getting the following stack trace: I was able to find the el-api JAR on a java.net maven repo, but I couldn't find the ri JAR anywhere. For our

Re: [petstore] Need Hibernate Help

2006-07-31 Thread Sean Schofield
with a parent category. Since I'm constructing a tree, I just want the top level and then lazily grab the rest as we go. Sean On 7/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've got the maven build working (once you install the el-ri.jar in your maven repo.) But I decided to post the key

Re: [petstore] Need Hibernate Help

2006-07-31 Thread Sean Schofield
Well I need to get caught up on my shale subprojects then! Thanks for the pointer. Sean On 7/31/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/31/06, Sean Schofield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I won't be able to look into this deeply until tonight, but the comment about Hypersonic makes

Do we need JIRA issues for sandbox stuff?

2006-07-31 Thread Sean Schofield
I anticipate a lot of changes to the shale-petstore over the next few weeks since this is a work in progress. Do I really need a JIRA issue for every little thing? My thinking is that sandbox stuff should be exempt from this requirement. This will encourage people to do an early check in so

Re: Source Repository Organization and Release Strategy Thoughts

2006-07-29 Thread Sean Schofield
I was also going to suggest just shipping this one as source. We will have to exclude the the incompatibly licensed dependencies from the default build, which means 'mvn install' would still build a war that doesn't work. (Back to that 'reading the directions' thing again. :) ). But 'mvn

Re: Source Repository Organization and Release Strategy Thoughts

2006-07-29 Thread Sean Schofield
Why is CDDL an issue? That was on Cliff's list of acceptable licenses. I wasn't sure which licenses were cool and which weren't. Google also just announced that they're going to do hosting of open source prrojects[1]. They are in the early days (don't even have infrastructure in place for

Re: Shale Nightly Builds

2006-07-25 Thread Sean Schofield
I noticed the download link on the website doesn't work. Maybe we want a download page similar to myfaces?[1] I seem to recall we had a page describing the artifacts, etc. ... Sean [1] http://myfaces.apache.org/download.html On 7/25/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks to

Re: shale-test build failure

2006-07-14 Thread Sean Schofield
There is no shale zone yet. For now we can use either Struts or MyFaces zone. MyFaces zone might make sense b/c it also has its own repo for newly released artifacts (before they make it to ibiblio?) Should we make inquiries on the myfaces-dev list asking if its ok to piggy back on the MyFaces

Re: svn commit: r419798 - in /shale/trunk/shale-test: pom.xml src/main/java/org/apache/shale/test/jmock/ src/main/java/org/apache/shale/test/jmock/AbstractJsfTestCase.java

2006-07-07 Thread Sean Schofield
That reminds me that we have a wiki to start building ... Sean On 7/7/06, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: matzew Date: Thu Jul 6 21:29:59 2006 New Revision: 419798 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=419798view=rev

Re: SHALE-123

2006-07-07 Thread Sean Schofield
I agree that there are a couple of major dialog bugs that need to be addressed before rolling this out. I'm happy to try and help once we come up with a plan of attack. Sean On 7/6/06, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 7/5/06, Matthias Wessendorf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey,