Hi Gary,
when checking the RC I found some minor things. None of them is blocking
IMO. Here is the list:
The release notes could be improved:
- The statement The Commons IO library contains utility classes, stream
implementations, file filters, file comparators and endian classes. is
Still getting the strange test failure with the ant build I reported for
one of the previous RCs, but if nobody else sees this, it may well
depend on my specific configuration.
Otherwise, everything looks good, so +1
Oliver
Am 26.03.2012 17:38, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello All:
This is a
I had a look at this issue, but could not come to a conclusion.
A test case for TestVFSConfigurationBuilder is failing. At first I
suspected a recent change in [vfs] would cause the problem. However, I
could locally build [configuration] with the recent [vfs] snapshot
version without any
Thanks for fixing this!
Oliver
Am 01.04.2012 18:27, schrieb rgo...@apache.org:
Author: rgoers
Date: Sun Apr 1 16:27:41 2012
New Revision: 1308148
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1308148view=rev
Log:
Have testValidation and testValidation2 test something useful
Modified:
Build works fine on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 04.04.2012 22:00, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
Hi all,
as indicated last weekend Compress' trunk has accumulated so much new
goodness it requires a new release.
Tarballs of Compress 1.4 RC1 are available here
Am 07.04.2012 12:37, schrieb Gary Gregory:
On Apr 7, 2012, at 5:41, Luc Maisonobeluc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Gary,
Le 07/04/2012 04:30, Gary Gregory a écrit :
On Apr 6, 2012, at 16:05, Luc Maisonobeluc.maison...@free.fr wrote:
Hi Gary,
Le 06/04/2012 21:50, Gary Gregory a écrit :
On
The maven build runs fine on JDK 1.6 on Windows 7. With the ant build I
get the same strange test failure as for the last release (so this is
probably not an issue).
The release notes say they are for version 2.3-SNAPSHOT.
There are some checkstyle warnings about unused imports which are
Hi all,
there is a request [1] for [configuration] to mark the packages of
certain dependencies in the OSGi manifest Import-Package header as
optional. [configuration] has some optional dependencies to other
Commons libraries; they are marked as optional in the pom, but this
information is
Hi,
build worked for me with Java 1.5 and 1.6 on Windows 7. However, I found
the following problems:
- commons-email-1.3.jar from the binary distribution does not contain
the license and NOTICE files in its META-INF folder.
- The clirr report contains 29 errors. I did not follow discussions
+1
I get a Java HeapSpace error in a test case when building with Java 1.5,
but ISTR that I had a similar issue for the 1.4 release, so this is
probably not an issue. Otherwise everything is fine.
Oliver
Am 22.05.2012 09:00, schrieb Stefan Bodewig:
Hi all,
I'd like to release Compress
Am 03.06.2012 15:56, schrieb Gary Gregory:
I use http://wiki.apache.org/commons/UsingNexus
Gary
On Jun 3, 2012, at 4:25, Damjan Jovanovicdam...@apache.org wrote:
Hi
I am trying to make an RC release of Commons Imaging, and according to
http://commons.apache.org/releases/prepare.html the
Maven and ant builds work fine on Windows 7 with JDK 1.6. Artifacts and
site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 13.06.2012 00:33, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello All:
This is a VOTE to release Commons IO 2.4-RC2.
Changes since RC1:
- Fix a bug in the new code for IO-326: Add new
Am 19.06.2012 20:50, schrieb sebb:
Several components don't appear to have created GA tags for their releases.
Normally when a release vote succeeds, the successful tag is copied to
a new tag without the RCn suffix.
For example, if the successful release vote was based on
commons-xyz-1.6_RC3
Am 20.06.2012 00:18, schrieb sebb:
On 19 June 2012 21:11,ohe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012
New Revision: 1351831
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1351831view=rev
Log:
Created tag for Configuration 1.8 release.
Added:
Am 21.06.2012 18:36, schrieb sebb:
On 21 June 2012 17:18, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 20 June 2012 20:25, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 20.06.2012 00:18, schrieb sebb:
On 19 June 2012 21:11,ohe...@apache.org wrote:
Author: oheger
Date: Tue Jun 19 20:11:15 2012
Hi,
there is a request [1] to publish a release of [configuration] which is
compatible with the newest version of [lang]. This really makes sense, I
am myself in a situation where I have to include [lang] in two versions
(2.x and 3.x) due to the dependency to [configuration]. Unfortunately,
Am 24.06.2012 03:05, schrieb sebb:
On 23 June 2012 23:00, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6/17/12 2:20 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 16:26, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/17/12 1:13 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 17/06/2012 08:49, Phil Steitz wrote:
Looks like only the relatively
+1
All looks good.
Oliver
Am 17.07.2012 14:08, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Hi all guys,
I am opening the current [VOTE] thread to release Apache
commons-dbutils-1.5 based on RC2.
Release Notes:
http://people.apache.org/builds/commons/dbutils/1.5/RC2/RELEASE-NOTES.txt
Tag:
Is there any relation or overlap to [configuration]?
Depending on your concrete requirements, this is probably over-sized.
But maybe a source of inspiration?
Oliver
Am 22.07.2012 10:00, schrieb Elijah Zupancic:
Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 11:54 PM, Simone Tripodi
, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Is there any relation or overlap to [configuration]?
Depending on your concrete requirements, this is probably over-sized. But
maybe a source of inspiration?
Oliver
Am 22.07.2012 10:00, schrieb Elijah Zupancic:
Thanks!
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012
Am 22.07.2012 21:01, schrieb Ted Dunning:
I don't believe that there are any commons math algorithms that would
benefit from execution in a Hadoop map-reduce style. The issue is that
iterative algorithms are essentially incompatible with the very large
startup costs of map-reduce programs under
configuration portion. Are there any plans to support YAML?
Thanks,
-Elijah
On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 1:16 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi Simo,
Am 22.07.2012 17:54, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Good point Oliver,
I honestly didn't think about [configuration], please apologize
://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Mon, Jul 23, 2012 at 9:43 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 23.07.2012 09:00, schrieb Simone Tripodi:
Good morning all,
so I continue proposing the already proposed roadmap: let's add the
façade APIs for the [chain
Build works fine on Windows 7 with a JDK 1.6 and Java-1.5 compatibility
profile. Artifacts look good.
There are some issues with the site:
- There is indeed a number of findbugs and pmd warnings. I trust you
that you already fixed many problematic ones. All these MALICIOUS_CODE
warnings are
Slightly off-topic:
Do you think the following approach could work: Consider there is a
central component - e.g. [flatfile] in sandbox - which implements
parsers for various text-base formats like YAML, JSON, CSV, ... and a
generic mechanism for transforming the parsed data into XML SAX
://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Slightly off-topic:
Do you think the following approach could work: Consider
There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in method
DynamicCombinedConfiguration.getCurrentConfig(). Indeed, the
double-check locking idiom is used, however, there is a comment saying
that this safe due to the usage of a ConcurrentMap.
This may be true, but I wonder whether
it would catch someone's eye.
Ralph
Thanks for clarifying. I added a suppression in the Checkstyle
configuration so that this warning will not pop up again.
Oliver
On Jul 29, 2012, at 12:40 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
There is a checkstyle warning about double-checked locking in method
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would like to switch to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in trunk, mainly to update
the [lang] dependency to 3.x (which is a binary incompatible change).
This has been requested multiple times. Therefore, it would
Am 31.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have in trunk soon.
Then I would like to switch to 2.0-SNAPSHOT in trunk, mainly to update
the [lang] dependency to 3.x (which is a binary incompatible change).
This has been
/
http://simonetripodi.livejournal.com/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
http://www.99soft.org/
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 9:48 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 31.07.2012 21:30, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Just a heads up: I plan to get out a 1.9 release with what we currently
have
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.9 based on the
first release candidate.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_9RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger/configuration-1.9rc1/
Binaries:
+1
Oliver
Am 16.08.2012 22:09, schrieb Oliver Heger:
This is a vote to release Apache Commons Configuration 1.9 based on the
first release candidate.
Tag:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/configuration/tags/CONFIGURATION_1_9RC1/
Site:
http://people.apache.org/~oheger
configuration files (which is generated by JavaCC) and define its
state transition graph. They have changed because the parser now
supports comments in configuration files.
Thanks for the review.
Oliver
Thank you,
Gary
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Oliver Heger
oliver.he...@oliver
Am 17.08.2012 23:58, schrieb sebb:
On 17 August 2012 21:02, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi Gary,
Am 17.08.2012 21:19, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Are the Clirr warning about constant value changes from 1.8 be an issue
for
existing clients?
Or, are the values only used
, 2012, at 11:13, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 17.08.2012 23:58, schrieb sebb:
On 17 August 2012 21:02, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi Gary,
Am 17.08.2012 21:19, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All,
Are the Clirr warning about constant value changes from 1.8
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the
distributions. I think this is outdated. Can anybody confirm this? I
will then update the instructions accordingly.
Thanks
Oliver
[1]
Am 20.08.2012 18:35, schrieb sebb:
On 20 August 2012 13:32, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the distributions. I
think this is outdated. Can anybody
Am 20.08.2012 16:08, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1] mentions that symbolic links should be created for the
distributions. I think this is outdated. Can anybody
Am 20.08.2012 16:54, schrieb Ralph Goers:
Yes - and I didn't get a chance to do it last night. Please give me another 24
hrs.
Ralph
Sure, no problem.
Oliver
On Aug 20, 2012, at 4:43 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Oops I meant Ralph not Sebb!
Gary
On Aug 20, 2012, at 7:38, Oliver Heger
The vote to release Commons Configuration based on RC1 has passed with
the +1 votes from following people:
Gary Gregory
Phil Steitz
Oliver Heger
All votes are binding, no other votes were cast.
Thanks to all who reviewed the artifacts.
Oliver
Am 16.08.2012 22:09, schrieb Oliver Heger
Am 21.08.2012 00:11, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 07:58:52PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 20.08.2012 16:08, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 02:32:25PM +0200, Oliver Heger wrote:
Just a question about our current documentation about cutting releases:
[1
://commons.apache.org/configuration/download_configuration.cgi
(Please remember to verify the provided checksums and/or signatures
after you have downloaded a distribution!)
Oliver Heger
on behalf of the Apache Commons Team
In [lang] there are a few places where Class.forName(String, boolean,
ClassLoader) is used to load classes dynamically (e.g. in
ClassUtils.getClass()).
According to the book OSGi in action (written by guys from the Felix
community) it is recommended to use ClassLoader.loadClass() instead. The
Am 01.09.2012 19:11, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hi All:
Checkstyle can report warnings like:
'+' should be on the previous line.
FWIW, I'm not fond of this particular checkstyle rule.
Does anyone know if the Eclipse formatter can be made to behave like this?
I've not found such setting in the
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development
version. This means we are free to implement major changes without
having to enforce binary backwards compatibility.
The question is: What are the goals for version 2.0? I would recommend
to define a clear focus so
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an
attribute node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface,
but of course not supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it
tries to encode the list as a comma-separated string. On reloading, such
strings are
with attribute splitting and delimiter parsing needs to go away.
Ralph
On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version. This
means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce binary
backwards
8, 2012, at 8:11 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Currently XMLConfiguration allows setting multiple values for an attribute
node. (This is possible through the Configuration interface, but of course not
supported by XML.) When saving the configuration it tries to encode the list as
a comma-separated
] who voted
against removing these tags.
Oliver
Benedikt
2012/9/7 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current development version.
This means we are free to implement major changes without having to enforce
binary backwards
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Hi all,
the pom was updated to make 2.0-SNAPSHOT the current
Build works fine with Maven and ant on Windows 7 with JDK 1.6. Artifacts
look good, site, too, except for the following very minor points (in
addition to the things Simone already discovered):
- The JIRA report is just a blank page (I think during build an
exception is thrown - maybe an
Am 11.09.2012 00:08, schrieb sebb:
On 10 September 2012 20:33, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Am 09.09.2012 14:26, schrieb sebb:
On 8 September 2012 15:45, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
wrote:
Am 08.09.2012 03:44, schrieb sebb:
On 7 September 2012 20:46
+1
The open points from the previous RC have been addressed.
BTW: The success rate of only 99.422% in the surefire report seems to be
caused by the fact that two tests in QuotedPrintableCodecTest are
skipped. Of course not an issue.
Oliver
Am 11.09.2012 14:26, schrieb Gary Gregory:
Hello
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve this.
I have some ideas about this topic - not fully thought out - and would
like to start a discussion. Here they are
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the incomplete
support for concurrent access to Configuration objects. In version 2.0
we should try to improve
Hi Phil,
Am 18.09.2012 20:09, schrieb Phil Steitz:
On 9/17/12 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi Jörg,
many thanks for your input!
Am 17.09.2012 10:01, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
one limitation of the 1.x versions of [configuration] is the
incomplete
support
Am 20.09.2012 22:38, schrieb Honton, Charles:
snip
This obviously makes the concurrency problem easier :)
Apart from this case, it would be good to agree on exactly what it
means for [configuration] to be threadsafe. Is it basically the
semantics of ConcurrentHashmap? Or are there
One of the pain points in the 1.x versions of [configuration] is IMHO
the implementation of FileConfiguration using inheritance over
AbstractFileConfiguration and AbstractHierarchicalFileConfiguration.
I started an attempt to work around this: The part of
AbstractFileConfiguration which deals
For [configuration] there is currently a feature request [1] to add some
data type conversion facilities. In the ticket the reporter describes an
algorithm how to construct an object of class A from input of class B by
first searching for a corresponding valueOf() method, and then - if this
Hi Matt,
Am 03.10.2012 21:25, schrieb Matt Benson:
If [configuration] depends on [lang] already, presumably this new
version should depend on [lang] 3.x instead; in which case why not use
its Builder interface?
Yes, we are going to switch to [lang] 3.x. I would like to use the
Builder
Hi,
in the last few days I have worked on a new approach for handling
reloading in a more generic and loosely coupled way. To get a better
base for discussion, I created some code (mainly in the reloading and
the new builder packages).
The basic idea is that reloading is no more handled by
changes. However, there is not yet a persist
event. Could you give a use case for such a notification?
Thank you for the feedback!
Oliver
Thanks,
chas
On 10/11/12 1:09 PM, Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de wrote:
Hi,
in the last few days I have worked on a new approach for handling
Hi Benedikt,
Am 05.11.2012 21:04, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2012/11/5 Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
Hi Oliver,
2012/11/5 ohe...@apache.org
Author: oheger
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:29:01 2012
New Revision: 1405889
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1405889view=rev
Log:
Initial version
Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Hi Benedikt,
Am 05.11.2012 21:04, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2012/11/5 Benedikt Ritter benerit...@gmail.com
Hi Oliver,
2012/11/5 ohe...@apache.org
Author: oheger
Date: Mon Nov 5 17:29:01 2012
New Revision: 1405889
URL:
http://svn.apache.org
Build works fine with Java 1.5 on Windows 7, artifacts and site look good.
Minor nits:
- The cobertura report shows a pretty low coverage rate.
- There is a bunch of findbugs errors; most of them are related to
encoding issues, so I guess this is nothing critical.
+1
Oliver
Am 26.11.2012
Hi all,
in [configuration] [beanutils] is used to initialize properties of Java
objects defined in configuration files. This works fine as long as the
objects conform to the Java Beans specification.
Now I would like to initialize other objects, too, which implement a
fluent interface as
in this component
currently.
Oliver
Regards,
Benedikt
[1] http://markmail.org/thread/5zgoyid5ld7otwsv
2012/12/5 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Hi all,
in [configuration] [beanutils] is used to initialize properties of Java
objects defined in configuration files. This works
Checked build with Java 1.5 under Windows 7. Artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 16.12.2012 15:03, schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
Hi,
I would like to call a vote from commons-email-1.3 based on RC6.
This release candidate has the following changes compared to RC5
+) fixed Clirr errors by
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows 7. Artifacts look good.
Some reports (checkstyle, findbugs) show errors, but this does not seem
to be problematic. Also the missing license headers in test files are no
blockers IMHO.
I am not sure about the clirr errors. There is nothing mentioned in
This seems to be a Java 1.5 problem related to generics. Build works
fine with Java 6 and 7.
As we depend on [lang] which now requires Java 1.6, I guess we have to
switch to 1.6 anyway.
Are there any objections?
Oliver
Am 18.12.2012 23:22, schrieb Continuum@vmbuild:
Online report :
version: 1.6.0_30, vendor: Sun Microsystems Inc.
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.6.0_30\jre
Default locale: de_DE, platform encoding: Cp1252
OS name: windows 7, version: 6.1, arch: x86, family: windows
Oliver
Am 19.12.2012 21:59, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Build works fine with JDK 1.5 on Windows
Am 20.12.2012 01:23, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:10:05PM +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Sent the main too early: The build takes pretty long on my old
machine, and it eventually failed with two test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
testMath753Shape142
Heger:
Am 20.12.2012 01:23, schrieb Gilles Sadowski:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:10:05PM +0100, Oliver Heger wrote:
Sent the main too early: The build takes pretty long on my old
machine, and it eventually failed with two test failures:
Results :
Failed tests:
testMath753Shape142
Hi all,
currently I am working on [CONFIGURATION-518] - rework of interpolation
features.
DefaultConfigurationBuilder supports that custom variable resolvers can
be defined in its definition files. I noticed that these resolvers are
not only used locally, but are also registered as global
Am 29.12.2012 09:43, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Hi Phil,
Le 28/12/2012 21:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 12/28/12 11:44 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
It seems a shame to turn off this feature for ALL projects because one
project can't figure out a workaround.
Can *any* project find a workaround? Is
PM, Phil Steitz phil.ste...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 12/29/12 9:46 AM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 29.12.2012 09:43, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Hi Phil,
Le 28/12/2012 21:10, Phil Steitz a écrit :
On 12/28/12 11:44 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
It seems a shame to turn off this feature for ALL
Hi,
recently I have worked on code regarding the creation of Configuration
objects and reloading support. I have created two Jira tickets [1, 2]
with a description of the problems I see in the current design.
The code in SVN (mainly in the new builder package) should be sufficient
to get a
Hi Jörg,
Am 04.01.2013 17:47, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
recently I have worked on code regarding the creation of Configuration
objects and reloading support. I have created two Jira tickets [1, 2]
with a description of the problems I see in the current design
Build is successful on Windows 7 with both a JDK 1.5 and 1.7. Artifacts
and site look good.
The only issue I found is that the copyright date in NOTICE.txt is still
2012. However, because there have hardly been changes in 2013, I don't
think that this is a blocker.
So +1
Oliver
Am
Am 18.01.2013 13:47, schrieb Olivier Lamy:
So all has been imported.
see result here: http://people.apache.org/~olamy/commons-content/
For releasing commons parent, the ASF parent pom is on vote on dev@maven
IMHO both proper and sandbox parents must be release.
Great! Many many thanks for all
I don't want to open another can of worms, but just want to state that I
am not in favor of all those final modifiers except when applied to
member fields of a class.
IMHO, this makes code harder to read because it only adds clutter. It
also hides the occasions where final is really required,
. With slight exceptions it can process
the same configuration definition files. So I plan to remove
DefaultConfigurationBuilder shortly.
Oliver
Am 05.01.2013 16:48, schrieb Oliver Heger:
Hi Jörg,
Am 04.01.2013 17:47, schrieb Jörg Schaible:
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
Hi,
recently I have
with them.
Sounds good. Currently I am following a bottom-up approach, i.e. I
create the various builders first. It should be possible to implement a
'meta' builder on top later.
Oliver
Ralph
On Jan 28, 2013, at 1:10 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
(From time to time I am going to post an update
Am 08.02.2013 09:26, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Simo,
2013/2/8 Simone Tripodi simonetrip...@apache.org
How do you feel about this? Checkstyle complains about this, and I think
it
is sufficient to tell users that an argument must not be null.
sorry, which one?
should have made that
Am 14.02.2013 16:51, schrieb Matt Benson:
I would say that certainly one would often want to create an API like
you've described. What I am reluctant not to support is:
class Foo {
static void add(ArgumentedBinary? extends CharSequence, ? extends
CharSequence functor);
}
Foo.add(new
Am 20.02.2013 16:25, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Jörg
2013/2/20 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com
Hi Benedikt,
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
I'd like to discuss how the development of [BeanUtils] and [BeanUtils2]
can be continued.
The last release of BeanUtils (1.8.3) is now nearly
Am 20.02.2013 16:42, schrieb t...@apache.org:
Author: tn
Date: Wed Feb 20 15:42:09 2013
New Revision: 1448251
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1448251
Log:
Update version info
Modified:
commons/proper/logging/trunk/src/conf/MANIFEST.MF
Modified:
Am 22.02.2013 17:43, schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
On 02/22/2013 05:35 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/22/2013 05:09 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/20/2013 09:48 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Thomas,
Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 02/20/2013 09:33 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 20.02.2013 16:42
Hi Benedikt,
Am 21.02.2013 20:14, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi,
2013/2/20 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Am 20.02.2013 16:25, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Jörg
2013/2/20 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@scalaris.com
Hi Benedikt,
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi,
I'd like
Build and site generation run fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.7.
Artifacts and site look good.
+1
Oliver
Am 24.02.2013 18:54, schrieb Thomas Neidhart:
Hi,
I'd like to call a vote for releasing Commons Email 1.3.1 based on RC2.
This release candidate has the following changes compared
Hi,
Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
release or start to work on new features right away and release a 1.9
(including bug fixes of course ;-)
Benedikt
I
+1, looks good.
Just one minor thing: The source release now contains the cgi for the
download page. Is this expected to be there? I did not notice it before,
but the RAT report was complaining about it. This was not the case for
the previous RC.
Oliver
Am 27.02.2013 22:37, schrieb Thomas
Am 01.03.2013 09:20, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Oliver,
2013/2/28 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Hi,
Am 28.02.2013 14:28, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/2/23 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
I just wanted to start a discussion whether we should push out a bugfix
Am 01.03.2013 09:22, schrieb Luc Maisonobe:
Hi Benedikt,
Le 01/03/2013 09:14, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
Nobody seems to know (or to care ;-), so I'll wait until 72 hours have
passed. If nobody objects until after 72 hours have passed, I'll file an
issue for INFRA.
As far as I know, there are
Am 06.03.2013 13:35, schrieb sebb:
On 6 March 2013 11:32, Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org wrote:
Hi,
I have recently learned that changing the required Java version for a
component does not necessarily affect binary compartibility [1].
I'm thinking about updating [BeanUtils] to Java 1.5. We
Am 14.03.2013 08:42, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
2013/3/10 Benedikt Ritter brit...@apache.org
Hi,
we have this bug filed for BeanUtils, that seems to be related to generic
collections used for indexed properties in conjunction with Java 7. In
summary, when using a ListString instead of a untyped
Build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.7, artifacts and site
look good.
One thing I noticed, not sure whether this is actually a problem: The
artifacts for adapters and api have the same manifest information as the
main jar. Are they intended to be used in an OSGi environment?
Am 16.03.2013 19:43, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
Hi Oliver
2013/3/16 Oliver Heger oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de
Build works fine on Windows 7 with Java 1.5 and 1.7, artifacts and site
look good.
One thing I noticed, not sure whether this is actually a problem: The
artifacts for adapters and api
1 - 100 of 953 matches
Mail list logo
