Just what we need is spark-gap radios on 6 and 2 meters. We just got through
fighting this a few years back.
Since 223 is little used and it's legal whats the problem with going up there ?
Chuck is right why is it that SS users feel they need to go on widely used
bands ? Even if legal the
There are lots of people on PSK31 here on 6 meters and some on 2 meters
too ... it works for them .
--- On Sat, 7/10/10, GregCT n1...@comcast.net wrote:
From: GregCT n1...@comcast.net
Subject: [digitalradio] VHF Contesting
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, July 10,
I AGREE !
However not all contesters are a PAIN IN THE *## just the few that push others
out of the way and interfer with daly QSO and nets ..
--- On Sat, 7/10/10, Dan Hensley kc9...@att.net wrote:
From: Dan Hensley kc9...@att.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] VHF Contesting
To:
I forwarded this to the Leo's here at the jail I myself are a civilian not a
cert LEO.
--- On Tue, 6/15/10, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Feld Hell LEO Sprint this Saturday 2000z - 2200z
To:
I beleve about 50.300 I know there is some psk-31 around there
--- On Sat, 5/8/10, Russell Blair russell_blai...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: Russell Blair russell_blai...@yahoo.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Digital Band for 6M
To: Digital Radio digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, May 8, 2010,
John
i have been there too Remember wide band digital on 6 and 2 meters ?
The problem with that group Of digihams is they don't care what what what they
want will do to all the other users after all we are legacy users a bunch
of old phooeys who are holding back the new ham
What's the problem you have 222MHZ and up
From: expeditionradio expeditionra...@yahoo.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sat, March 6, 2010 3:40:42 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anecdotes about FCC inadvertent hostility toward
ham radio digital
But the situation where existing users of the bands suddenly have their
activities disrupted when people start going mad with some flavour of the month
new mode is unacceptable, and the controls the FCC exercise over amateurs in
the USA do at least go some way to prevent this.
This is why
: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 9:45 AM
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 8:54 AM, bruce mallon wa4...@yahoo. com wrote:
SO what you are saying is lets ctush the other modes so we can play with our
new toy ?
We just went through this with wideband/spredsprec trum on 6 and 2 meters
.
I dont
wrote:
From: jhaynesatalumni jhhay...@earthlink.net
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Digital modes band plans.
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, February 20, 2010, 2:44 PM
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, bruce mallon wa4...@... wrote:
I remember several spredsprectum
We have a group on SSB here
--- On Sat, 1/2/10, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] VHF Digital?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, January 2, 2010, 5:53 PM
May be workable in a large city
I ONLY SEND REAL CARDS TRY ME TOO ..
--- On Wed, 12/16/09, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Techs on HF digital
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, December 16, 2009, 12:08 PM
At
signallink USB
--- On Wed, 6/17/09, lsumners lsumn...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: lsumners lsumn...@yahoo.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Sound Cards
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, June 17, 2009, 9:58 AM
I am looking at upgrading my Dell on board sound card. Any
I thought it was the original Digital mode
--- On Mon, 6/1/09, S.J. felineveterinar...@yahoo.com wrote:
From: S.J. felineveterinar...@yahoo.com
Subject: [digitalradio] . . . the other digital mode
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 1, 2009, 11:15 AM
CW
AVOID FT-100 or 100D
--- On Thu, 5/28/09, kh6ty kh...@comcast.net wrote:
From: kh6ty kh...@comcast.net
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] How do I get started with digital radio?
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, May 28, 2009, 7:36 AM
For about $500 you can get a secondhand
Corperation it's a wonderfull thing Nice to see people working to prevent
problems ... !
--- On Wed, 4/8/09, David Kruh wb2...@comcast.net wrote:
From: David Kruh wb2...@comcast.net
Subject: [digitalradio] NEW 20 METER HELL CALLING FREQUENCY
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date:
IT IS ABOUT TIME ..
I was beginning to understand some of them .
--- On Wed, 4/1/09, John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net wrote:
From: John Becker, WØJAB w0...@big-river.net
Subject: [digitalradio] PROPOSED RULE MAKING AND ORDER
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday,
Things go round and around
Back 70 years ago the FCC band SPARK GAP because it was wide
and interfered with other stations. CLEAN NARROW signals became the standard.
With bands like 220 MHz sitting there dead one would think wide band on 20
meters
would be the last thing we see. .
by and also not be automated or considered common carrier.
See, everyone could get their wish
Cause and effect; what a concept...
David
KD4NUE
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com [mailto:digitalradi o...@yahoogroups. com]
On Behalf Of bruce mallon
Anything below 50.200 is not wise When open 6 will be packed with SSB up to at
least 50.250 mhz Now here ( TAMPA ) where I'm from we use PSK-31 and stations
are around 50.290 usb it has not caused any problems with SSB users. Also avoid
50.400 thats the AM hangout and you should be good to go
:
From: Dave Bernstein aa...@ambersoft.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: Anti-Digital Hams
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Saturday, March 7, 2009, 10:25 PM
AA6YQ comments below
--- In digitalradio@ yahoogroups. com, bruce mallon wa4...@... wrote:
I strongly disagree. Your post is just
Your response above does not clarify your original post; if anything, it
increases the ambiguity
NO IT ANSWERED YOUR QUESTION .
Same old stuff its digital or the highway .
Have a nice day
Bruce
Now I feel it's a much different story. So to determine what the standard
operations are, you really have to look around and look at magazines like RF
design, Urgent Communications.
I WORK in public safety ..
Our system here is ANALOG . both on the county and Jail systems .
We use
I strongly disagree. Your post is just another variant of everyone should
operate the way I do. While you are free to espouse this philosophy, we are
free to ignore it.
Hummm
Then you oppose using LEGACY mode users when talking about CW and SSB ham's ?
We all must keep in mind that the digital modes are in a constant
state of evolution
Are you saying there is no standard ? If so how can you set calling
frequencies ?
NOTE .
SSB, AM, CW and FM can be coped by 50 year old as well as 50 hour old radios.
I thought that was WHAT the hell LOL
--- On Mon, 6/2/08, S.J. lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt; wrote:
From: S.J. lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]gt;
Subject: [digitalradio] Re:Update: Digital Modes in 2008
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, June 2, 2008, 11:54 AM
Hell is an Analog Mode . . .
how about 11 ? LOL
It's only 35 miles north of me but my wife would KILL
me if I came home with THAT .
--- Robert Chudek - K0RC [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wonder if it covers the 30-meter band?
73 de Bob - KØRC in MN
- Original Message -
From: John Becker, WØJAB
MY POINT IS ..
You ( DIGITAL USERS ) call CW ( ANALOG ) stone age
..
You call those who enjoy SSB, AM, FM or just talking
on the radio the reason ham radio is dieing .
YOU ARE OUR SALVATION ! You by your digital modes will
save the bands from the invading army of other users
...
Elaine
You really know how to make Friends with comments like
STONE AGE .
Seems to me that the ones dragging there knuckles on
the ground are those who fail to accept the fact that
there are other things but using the ham bands for
E-MAIL
When you start to act like others exist and they
to hams for QSOs.
73,
John
KD6OZH
- Original Message -
From: bruce mallon
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com ; R.obert Mount
Sent: Sunday, December 30, 2007 03:16 UTC
Subject: [digitalradio] 220 sits empty
The spectrum between 50 and 450 MHz is useful
I cannot believe the holder of a valid ham radio
license would ever come out and say this
FROM .
--- John B. Stephensen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the rule changes are to extend beyond 29 MHz,
narrow-band segments on the VHF and UHF bands should
allow a maximum bandwidth of 8 kHz.
The spectrum between 50 and 450 MHz is useful because
path losses are low FOR SSB AND CW ..
THAT'S RIGHT FOR SSB, CW how many 200 kHz wide
stations can you fit on 220 or 440 ? how much more
path loss ? The 300 khz is a joke every time that has
been tried it has failed so nwhat you say for
Yep you shure had that right !
--- Jose A. Amador [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It is amazing that the developists in highly
developed places forgets
that the world is far from being equally developed
and connected, with
high speed digital repeater networks, easily
accessible Internet, etc,
I just move to another frequency and move on. There
are plenty channels to use out there!!.
The problem will be you will run out of places to go.
I AGREE ! we do need to solve these problems however
as long as 1% of all hams feel they Are entitled to
50% of the bands or more its not going to
Scott
There is some here and APRS too but not a lot
--- Scott L. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ahhh, the old days300 baud HF packet. I remember
when it was all
the rage in the early 1990s. Now, VHF packet (1200
baud) was much more
interesting and I even had a packet BBS. That was in
But, it won't happen; the FCC Will take spectrum
back, long before we ever evolve to the point of
becoming better operators and having constructive
discussion for the common good.
Ham radio an't broke if the digicrats would wake up
and smell the interferance coffie and work to be just
another
Hum . I dont see any move to kill digital.
Digital stiil can do what they want above 219 mhz and
thats where it BELONGS ...
When 219 and up is full worry about HF .
--- W2XJ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the CW portion of our bands nothing that is more
than 500 hertz bandwidth
Bonnie ..
You forgot one .
They they wanted to put digital wide band below 219
Mhz ...
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First FCC Came for the PACTOR3,
and I did not speak out
because I was not a PACTOR operator.
Then FCC came for RTTY,
and I did not speak out
You really need to view RM-11392 for what it is, the
entire thrust of RM-11392 in my opinion is an effort
at protectionism ( its an old story that dates back
ages ) of obsolete technology and practices by
an attempt to limit the advancement of new
technologies and practices, this is just the
NO STEVE
You and the digi boys need to get it
You have entire bands on UHF to use and they sit EMPTY
..
Your disrespect for all of those who are happy with
analog shows how little you care about the hobby. ONLY
YOUR SELF ..
IF IT Ain't DIGITAL it ain't radio
When you can show
And WHY would you go digital on a car radio? How many
HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS of radios would have to be
replaced? The shift to the new TV format in Feb. 2009
is only going to work because so many are on CABLE
--- Barry Garratt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IBOC is a method whereby both analog
what will be the frequency for PSK-31 ?
--- David [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Andy...what frequency is used on 10m...its a big
band hi hi
David VK4BDJ
Andrew O'Brien wrote:
This might be worth a try. 10M was open at these
times last weekend.
I woldl hazard a guess that they will
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The recent RTTY contest leads one to ponder:
Why don't we see much backlash against contests?
By orders of magnitude, contests create more QRM
than any other cause on ham radio. They commonly
render multiple ham bands nearly unusable for
THAT WAS GOOD ! LOL
--- r_lwesterfield [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This is excellent . . . just what this group needs .
. . and I deeply and
truly mean that . . .sheesh . . .
Rick - KH2DF
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please detail all the HF frequencies and modes
your people will be manually monitoring 24/7.
(This will make big news in the ham community)
27.185 AM here in Tampabay ...
This is the only active non SSB frequency here ..
OK John
You have had your say NOW MINE.
ONE LAST TIME .
I just sent out in MAY 2007 110 QSL cards all worked
on ssb between 50.110 and 50.350 and at 50.400 was a
group of AM boys. this time I had to pass on
working them. 6 IS used if you want a dead band
you need to save 10
bandwidth
data on most HF
bands if we want to.
Bonnie KQ6XA
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, bruce mallon
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the ARRL wants to start another fire storm push
that 100 khz wide on 6 and 2 meters stuff again
with
new regulations.
-Go for the changes and then lobby our Division
Directors to get the
ARRL to accept some mixed mode/content areas,
especially for emergency
use which is my main interest area.
73,
Rick, KV9U
bruce mallon wrote:
BONNY YOU CANNOT AND YOU KNOW IT .GET
INTERESTING Mark good link..It did explane about
digital's place clearly and well.
SADLY it dosn't cover the ( here we go again ) report
on regulation by bandwidth. Hard to beleve that is
still around ...
--- Mark Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A Beginner's Look at Ham Radio's
BETTER CHECK THIS
--- Tony Heatwole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TARA's Grid Dip PSK-RTTY contest is Saturday,
August 5, 2006,
from 00:00 UTC to 23:59 UTC. See:
http://www.n2ty.org/seasons/tara_grid_rules.html
for the full contest information. I hope that you
can join us!
LSB ILLEGAL ON 10 meters ? Or they just out of band ?
--- Robert Chudek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry... I should have spelled out Pennsylvania
[PA]. In the US 28.300 is the low limit for 10m
phone, so when using LSB, they're out of the band.
Not that it will draw much attention on 10m
he only OUT OF BANDERS we hear here is on 28.085
AM.
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Considering the number of true Outbanders on 10
metres,
this hardly seems like more than a minor infraction
:)
Bonnie KQ6XA
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com, Simon Brown
[EMAIL
Whats wrong with it?
Spam problems ?
--- Leigh L Klotz, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Careful with the free version...
http://www.theregister.com/2007/06/05/microsoft_mvp_threats/
Leigh/WA5ZNU
Bored
JOE As of now its a dead issue
BUT ... To Answer YOUR comment To allow a group to
come in ant TAKE 90% of a band for their own use is
INSANE.
Bonnie fails to say ... They already are allowed on
...
219 - 220 mhz but how many digital users using wide
band?
420 - 450 mhz same
MOST are on
ITS NOT what is going on is the government has radar
on that band and HAMS are not supposed to interfere
with it. They have a problem with that radar. NOW if
70cm goes away it will go back to the GOVERNMENT.
SAME OLD LIES .. no one is out to get it and the
government has 1st dibs anyway.
If
.
With 54-216 mhz being up for sale there will bew lots
of space for use in the south west far more that 4
megs we have now.
Bruce
--- Walt DuBose [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bruce mallon wrote:
Bonnie
NO ONE IS AFTER 6 METERS
Seriously...you think not? Open it to
commercial
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce, the center frequency of my skeleton-slot
design is 144.2 MHz, as it is specifically intended
for SSB operation.
INTERESTING I could not remember the name it's
been too long but the antenna worked as good as
stacked 7 elm cushcrafts back
NO you better get real 1% of all hams do not need 90%
of a band ANY BAND .
8:00? 8:25? 8:40? Find a flick in no time
with the Yahoo! Search movie showtime shortcut.
59.3 to 54.000 is 90% and if it was used by 17
stations is't usless to all others ...
IM DONE
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You better work on your math, Bruce!
A 100 kHz channel in 4 MHz is only 2.5%
Original Message Follows
From: bruce
OK John
You have had your say NOW MINE no rebuttals please..
ONE LAST TIME .
1st when did I EVER state I was a lawyer? As for ill
informed how may receive stations did your 24/7/365
experiment use to show the lack of interference from
your proposed mode ?
ANSWER ONLY ONE and he was
Bonnie
NO ONE IS AFTER 6 METERS
100 khz wide is now legal abovee 219 so you have lots
of room. You have never been on 6 or you have a junk
station since this is the bottom of the cycle and 10
is not open either so lets take it too lets not
forget 15, 12 and CB on one on them either
EVEN if
I was wondering what the center frequency was and the
band width THAT'S WHY I ASKED IF IT WAS USABLE ON SSB.
I had 7 over 7 skeleton-slot beams made in England in
the late 1960 and I'm WELL aware of that array.
As for BIG WHEELS had them too a stacked pair and have
given thought to building
--- Danny Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Give it up Erik. Money talks, and talks louder than
anyone else. Some PSK operators are no different
that the guys on 80 meters, talking across town, using
linears so they can drown out everyone else on
the band.
Danny .
I have lived in
--- alazia2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You will only get my SignaLink USB
by prying it from my cold dead fingers!
You have THAT right.
I'm going to build a small machine just for the card I
removed the sound blaster for the test and all
problems went away but i need it to run everything
--- Skip KH6TY [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There will be a QST constructions article in coming
months for a horizontally- polarized 2m antenna that
equals the performance of a 5-element beam,
Usable on SSB ... ??
I have worked New York state from tampabay on USB
with stacked ku4ab squailos.
Well after more than 2 months the little box has
arrived.
It hooked up to my TS-2000 without a problem and works
like a champ EXCEPT .
For some reason it and my SOUND BLASTER card don't
like each other and you have to configure the computer
for the SL-USB or the sound blaster card
with it please
email me direct if you like, or come back to the
list for extra suggestions.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
David Ingram (VK4TDI)
Real email: dave at ingramtech dot com
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
http://www.ingramtech.com/
MGRS: 56J MQ 991583Grid Square: QG62lm
bruce mallon
OK so what we have here is a failure to communicate ?
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please click here to read the HFLINK recommendation
comments:
http://www.hflink.com/arrl/
Background
On 22 Feb 2007, the ARRL announced that it seeks
comments from
amateurs concerning
Then DO IT and let the FCC rule .
Just remember for your long distance digipeaters to
work the band must be open .
unless your going to use ECHOLINK and if so whats the
point ?
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Like many kinds of interesting digital
communications, it
Currently, there are vast areas of HF spectrum that
currently have absolutely zero ham radio signals. We
don't need to use very narrow bandwidth signals when
these conditions exist.
It is good amateur radio practice to develop
digital voice modes, at any bandwidth, and to
explore the
AND if this is true why are they not legal now?
--- expeditionradio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would you like to show us those frequency's?
And would you like to show them when the MUF gets
that
high.
Hi Bruce,
Digital Voice repeaters, using
Now I'm not a big 12 meter guy but from what i
remember it gets packed when open. On 10 meters 29.000
- 29.200 has classic AM, 29.2 - 29.5 used to have
some satellite users ...
IF you could show under OPEN band conditions it might
work you might have something HOWEVER E-Skip can come
and go
50.250
--- Dave Sparks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is anyone using JT65a on 6 meters (or higher) for
terrestrial (non-EME) Work? If so, what is the best
frequency to try?
--
Dave
AF6AS
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has
-in for a
three-way QSO...
Then they are lost in reverse order as they both
drive out of range.
Talk about lonely (except around Dayton time)...I
usually fall out of my
chair when the squelch breaks! (HI)
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
have a D* system here in Dallas, but I don't know
how busy it is. I have
an
Icom 2200 with D* capability. I will have to check
it out this weekend and
report back.
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
then how do you expect to know if you are interfering
with someone if they cant id you ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
)
And stop wasting your time on this reflector...
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Digi Voice: No Bandwidth
Limit (was Re: ARRL
wake up ..)
Date
I'm trying to keep the bands populated It gets
lonely on 432 SSB ..LOL
--- John Champa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bruce,
That's impressive! Good for you...
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
I think this is a good idea Bonnie.
Get on 20 meters with a few hundered of your wide band
digital users on field day and demand they not
interfere with your group ...
It will make for a interesting test case.
your comment
I will be happy to provide a examples of how the
rules allow
Go for it but make shore all of you ID in CW so your
calles can be noted by the stations who will complain
...
--- bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think this is a good idea Bonnie.
Get on 20 meters with a few hundered of your wide
band
digital users on field day and demand
John
1) I work in 2 way radio and have for 40+ years Here
at the S.O. ( JAIL ) we are still analog UHF.
2) I'm on the air almost every day on a number of
bands and modes and got my start on 2 meter AM
40+ years ago using converted WW2 aircraft radios.
3) I own digital radio equipment
--- Bill Vodall WA7NWP [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one wants to crush the older modes -- but they
can't block moving to new modes and that's what's
happening now.
Explane ? What modes are blocking who ? on 145.900 ?
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired
EXACTLY MY PROBLEM WITH THE ARRL ..
( and the 6 meter give away )
NO PROTECTION FOR EXISTING STATIONS OR MODES .
--- Skip Teller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but there was nothing I could find in RM-11306 that
made it impossible to use a new technology ,1500 watt
signal, modulated at
John Im seting up for scatter ... so many of us do run
digital .
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
1) Who are you talking to ? No one by the name BRFUCE
here must be a lost digital bit at 100 khz wide
2.4 ghz digi .
2) THEY are the ARRL
3)THEY are supose to do the will of the members
4)THEY don't seem intrested in doing THAT.
5) THEY should be asking for the members not the
,
Encryption is a requirement in Ham Radio whenever a
band is
shared with another service AND there is automatic
data connection
capability enabled, e.g. the use of 802.11b
modulation on 2.4 GHz.
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
for the ARRL for years, and that's
not
appreciated.
Thanks,
John - K8OCL
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ARRL wake up ..
Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007
My dream was / is an ADV 100 kHz channel up around
53 MHz where we could have ADV QSOs over 50 -100
miles without investing a fortune in antennas.
There are very few 6M FM repeaters in my area and the
local coordinators are happy to keep a few channels
uncoordinated for our ADV use.
John -
Hear we go again WHAT ?
--- radionorway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here we go again..
la5vna
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Tony
1) what frequency are you using ?
2) I have on order a SOUNDLINK card will it run that
mode?
--- Tony [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
I used trhe SL1 on the ft-100 with good results on
PSK-31 the seting of the audio kinda high too.
--- John Becker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James
I'm using the same Signalink model Sl-1. Other then
the USB
connection they are the same. I have found that you
must really
give it a lot of RX
well regarding the sideband issue, my understanding
is that it was done that way because of the technical
limitation of the mixer or sideband filtering method
of the rigs back then would no allow the lower
frequencies
I beleve your right. I had several PHASE type
1950's SSB radios years ago
Well they would feel right at home ...
Leadership at the ARRL can be described as a BUNCH OF
FLAKES
Your question
Will the ARRL move to Battle Creek?
Sucker-punch spam with award-winning
WALT ... THINK THINK ... 100 khz wide signals
are going to KILL any band you put them on and do you
think anyone will look for OTHERS before fireing up a
digital radio .. GEESE go on 75 and lissen to SSB
they can't even handle THAT mode ..
--- Walt DuBose [EMAIL PROTECTED]
440 ALSO has NO SKIP and 8 TIMES the space
NOW how are you going to work it out when 6 is OPEN
world wide ?
ANYONE with a half a brain knows 6 is not the place
for this ..
also how are you not going to interfere with repeaters
on 2 meters they cover 3 out of 4 mhz of that
band ?
The ARRL has no clue . and do not care .
When open 6 meters is packed solid from 50.105 to 50.5
with ssb there are AM users on 50.400 and PSK-31
between 50.5 and 50.7 RIGHT NOW the band is closed but
it will not be in 2 to 3 years the only open spot is
between 50.7 and 51.5 above that are
We have had PSK and RTTY and APRS users for DECADES
and because they take up similar space they do not
cause a problem AND they have place themselves AWAY
from most other users . however you know unlike
the 5 watt comments What we see on 6 is the HIGH power
boys crawl out of the woodwork at
that before too! (HI)
What are you doing here anyway? Aren't you an AMer?
BTW, if it is any comfort to you, OFDM is sometimes
defined
as a form of digital AM, so you should feel right at
home (HI).
John
Original Message Follows
From: bruce mallon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply
no the ARRL will pay with loss of 90% of its members
... they will see just how many unhappy hams are out
there come renewal time .
ENJOY YOUR BAND all 12 of you .
im done ..
This will be the end of ham radio .
Don't pick lemons.
See all the new 2007 cars at Yahoo! Autos.
http://autos.yahoo.com/new_cars.html
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
