On 10/06/2010 06:12 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
finally, this list is also available via GMANE:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss
Florian
Working?
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+unsubscr...@documentfoundation.org
All messages you send to this
On 10/08/2010 07:40 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-10-08 20:33, NoOp a écrit :
On 10/06/2010 06:12 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
finally, this list is also available via GMANE:
http://dir.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss
Florian
Working?
Works for me
On 10/09/2010 03:36 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
Am 09.10.2010 um 05:20 schrieb NoOp:
Like the OOo lists (and other gmane.org lists), posts via gmane.org
shouldn't also require a direct email subscription as gmane.org does
the
email verification directly before allowing a user
LibO install in Windows currently follows the go-oo practice of removing
existing OOo installs (without warning). It can of course be installed
in parallel (see my thread [libreoffice-users] [Windows] LibO in
parallel w/OOo? on the users list, but that provides several distinct
disadvantages:
1.
On 10/11/2010 05:44 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-10-11 19:00, NoOp a écrit :
LibO install in Windows currently follows the go-oo practice of removing
existing OOo installs (without warning). It can of course be installed
in parallel (see my thread [libreoffice-users] [Windows] LibO
On 10/09/2010 02:23 PM, Scott Furry wrote:
This survey is to gauge the views of the LibreOffice community on the
install/update method of LibreOffice. Please voice your opinion so that
these considerations may be taken into account when the LibreOffice
method of install/update is studied
On 10/12/2010 01:30 AM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please, don't enter into political consideration of something that was
just a bug. It was me that screwed it up and during the pre-announcement
phase sprint, I forgot to regenerate the product IDs
On 10/13/2010 08:59 AM, Ken Brown wrote:
On 10/12/2010 4:30 AM, Fridrich Strba wrote:
It was me that screwed it up and during the pre-announcement
phase sprint, I forgot to regenerate the product IDs and thus LO had the
product IDs of OOo. This is fixed in beta2, so stay tuned. As a
On 10/13/2010 10:52 AM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
Hi,
2010/10/13 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net:
...
I'm preparing to test it now:
http://mirrors.supportex.net/tdf/libreoffice/testing/3.3.0-beta2/win/x86/
Note that it's a huge download: 318M
This is because it's a multi-language build.
I
On 10/13/2010 11:14 AM, NoOp wrote:
On 10/13/2010 10:52 AM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
...
It is very much recommended to do the uninstall of beta1.
If you try to over-install with beta2 you will have two will have two
entries for LO in the system control panel afterwards. This is a known
bug
On 10/13/2010 10:26 AM, leif wrote:
The Beta2 crashes when inserting caption text in Writer.
I'm using Ubuntu 32bit.
Confirm. Can you please move this over to the users list perhaps we
can figure out how to troubleshoot?
Gary (NoOp)
--
To unsubscribe, e-mail to discuss+h
On 10/13/2010 05:22 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2010-10-13 20:06, NoOp a écrit :
On 10/13/2010 10:26 AM, leif wrote:
The Beta2 crashes when inserting caption text in Writer.
I'm using Ubuntu 32bit.
Confirm. Can you please move this over to the users list perhaps we
can figure out how
On 11/02/2010 08:28 AM, T. J. Brumfield wrote:
There were several old, often commented on, and often requested bug fixes
and features that didn't receive much attention or weren't resolved with OOo
over the years.
For those who may not be aware of the reasons for the shift/fork, or for
On 11/18/2010 12:12 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Andy Brown wrote (18-11-10 20:34)
Is anyone besides me having a problem opening the DEB archives for Beta
3? I keep getting an error tar: This does not look like a tar archive.
I had the same problem with beta 2.
So after some silence on the list, I
On 11/19/2010 06:22 PM, Michel Gagnon wrote:
Le 2010-11-19 19:35, NoOp a écrit :
On 11/19/2010 03:26 PM, Sean White wrote:
As a concerned user, if LibreOffice is meant a independent office project
derived from the OpenOffice code then why do we still use their version
numbering system
On 11/09/2010 03:45 AM, David Nelson wrote:
Hi Guy, :-)
On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 18:13, Guy Voets nimant...@gmail.com wrote:
You have asked SeaMonkey to connect securely to bugs.freedesktop.org,
but we can't confirm that your connection is secure.
Normally, when you try to connect securely,
On 11/22/2010 06:43 AM, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
...
René
It isn't so much that I administer a Debian release as that I USE a
Debian release and do what I can. What I do is what I have managed to
learn to do over time, but without any formal training in UNIX, Linux,
administration, coding, or
On 11/22/2010 04:33 AM, Rene Engelhard wrote:
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 08:04:29AM -0700, Craig A. Eddy wrote:
listed in the README_en-US file. I'm not familiar with dpgk, though I
Then get. You administer a Debian-based system without knowing dpkg? Oh my.
(Besides that,
On 11/23/2010 11:16 PM, Marwan Gedeon wrote:
I'm sorry if asking this here is inappropriate, I couldn't find the
answer in FAQ, neither another mailing list dedicated for that purpose:
what is the proper place/people to resort to, in order to report/resolve
issues with current LibreOffice's
On 11/26/2010 12:16 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
Marc Paré wrote:
...
Of these two options, I would prefer being offered the menu AFTER
having downloaded the LO suite. The reason for this: some users may
find that downloading the suite took a longer than the anticipated
time and they would not
On 11/30/2010 02:43 AM, plino wrote:
The point here is that OOo has a small installer with 140Mb (no Java, and
only English, Spanish and French dictionaries).
Why is LO going in the opposite direction with 299 and 466Mb???
The current packages (including in the smallest option 56 language
On 12/02/2010 11:57 AM, BRM wrote:
- Original Message
From: Robert Derman robert.der...@pressenter.com
I remember that optical disks started to replace floppies in about 1995
because Win-95 came either way. Win-98 was CD only. I will admit that DVD
burners didn't become
On 12/16/2010 12:57 PM, RGB ES wrote:
2010/12/16 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net:
But I reckon that this can be fixed by not installing, or uninstalling
(on my debian based system):
libobasis3.3-ooofonts_3.3.0-17_i386.deb
Umm, well, no: this will not install opensymbol font so you
On 12/16/2010 01:06 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 12/16/2010 12:57 PM, RGB ES wrote:
2010/12/16 NoOp snipped:
But I reckon that this can be fixed by not installing, or uninstalling
(on my debian based system):
libobasis3.3-ooofonts_3.3.0-17_i386.deb
Umm, well, no: this will not install opensymbol
On 12/15/2010 02:07 PM, Tibor Bamhor wrote:
Hi, Friend of mine had an issue with openoffice, He was asked to
deliver pdf in CMYK colorspace. It is not possible by now AFAIK. But
are there any plans or any work being done in this regard? I just
wonder, it is not critical issue for me, nor for
On 12/20/2010 12:19 PM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2010-12-17 8:09 PM, NoOp wrote:
- LO takes over all OOo application defaults icons.
- LO uses the same executable names as OOo (soffice.exe, swriter.exe,
etc). This makes it impossible to select an .odt and re-associate it
with OOo.
While I
On 12/31/2010 08:38 PM, Timothy Mark Brennan, Jr. wrote:
Happy New Year from Brazil
2011/1/1 Prabath Galagamage gprab...@gmail.com:
Happy New Year from Sri Lanka
Happy New Year from San Jose/Milpitas, California
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
On 12/31/2010 08:14 AM, Steven Shelton wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/31/2010 10:03 AM, Kevin André wrote:
I would suggest the following instead. Support OOXML completely,
but when the user saves his/her document in a proprietary format
display a confirmation
On 12/31/2010 02:18 AM, Sveinn í Felli wrote:
But I think that in a corporate context, a batch program for converting
.doc and .docx to ODF would get some support and would/could ease the
conversion. After all those years, there's a pile of .docs sitting on
most PCs in this world. And
On 01/01/2011 12:58 PM, Sveinn í Felli wrote:
Þann lau 1.jan 2011 19:57, skrifaði NoOp:
On 12/31/2010 02:18 AM, Sveinn í Felli wrote:
But I think that in a corporate context, a batch program for converting
.doc and .docx to ODF would get some support and would/could ease the
conversion
On 01/02/2011 10:49 AM, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2011-01-01 1:43 PM, Jonathan Aquilina wrote:
Whats really held OOo and will hold LO back is the lack of an equivalent
program such as outlook.
Well, I disagree, but there is no way to prove one of us is right, so...
There are one of three
On 01/25/2011 06:43 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
- the Windows installer, which is going to impact the largest and most
diverse user base, has been integrated into a single build containing
all language versions, thus reducing the size for download sites from 75
to 11GB, making it easier for us
On 01/27/2011 05:01 PM, Johanes Lee wrote:
Hi,
I downloaded LibreOffice 64-bit for Deb Version:
LibO_3.3.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
But extracted as following directory
LibO_3.3.0rc4_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US
Install success,
Found this version information in the
On 01/27/2011 03:34 AM, Michael Meeks wrote:
Hi there,
On Tue, 2011-01-25 at 18:43 -0800, NoOp wrote:
It also still uses soffice.exe et all in Windows; meaning that LO still
takes over OOo if both are installed in parallel.
Unfortunately, there is some inevitability of conflict here
On 01/30/2011 04:01 AM, Magnus Johansson wrote:
Halló Sveinn, and thanks for your reply. I don't know if my EPS images are
vector graphics or bitmapped. How can I find out?
This discussion is probably better over on the libereoffice user list -
that way you might find more answers.
I've had
On 02/01/2011 01:44 AM, Magnus Johansson wrote:
I have made two test files with the kind of EPS images I work with. I put the
test together with OOo in the ODT document and then printed a PDF file of
that document with CUPS-PDF; I hope I managed to upload and attach them here
properly. With
On 02/04/2011 12:18 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/4 Harold Fuchs hwfa.libreoff...@gmail.com
...
Google translator translates your 戴安理 as Diane Li. Why, please? I have
*no* Chinese of any description (Mandarin, Cantonese, ...) whatsoever so, if
it's a pun or similar, please explain.
Oh, and
RC1 PreRelease missing 32bit debs
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
64bit .debs are there, but not the 32bit .debs.
Clicking on 'Linux x86 (deb) results in:
null
Also checking:
http://download.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/testing/3.3.1-rc1/deb/
On 02/12/2011 02:17 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/12 Robert Holtzman hol...@cox.net
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:46:02PM +0100, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Christophe Strobbe schrieb:
I hope they are, but[...]
Hi,
I see several problems:
On 02/10/2011 12:32 PM, abenglen wrote:
I have used OpenOffice for several years, and now I am trying to install
LibreOffice on a Windows XP computer. About 4/5th the way thru installing
(according to progress on the status bar), installation stops (hangs) and
goes no further. There was no
On 02/14/2011 12:13 PM, twcw chenhall wrote:
On 12/02/11 00:55, NoOp wrote:
RC1 PreRelease missing 32bit debs
http://www.libreoffice.org/download/pre-releases/
64bit .debs are there, but not the 32bit .debs.
Clicking on 'Linux x86 (deb) results in:
null
Also checking:
http
On 02/20/2011 07:39 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
I recently had occasion to reinstall 64-bit Ubuntu 10.10 (n b, not because
of a problem in Ubuntu itself, but because I replaced Windows Vista with
Windows 7 on the Windows side of this dual-boot machine and thereafter
failed in my attempts to restore
On 02/21/2011 12:18 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/21 NoOp ...
Perhaps try iBus instead?
https://help.ubuntu.com/community/ibus
NoOp, thanks for your suggestion. Alas, I found myself unable to get IBus to
work ; for example, after installing IBus according to the instructions on
the Ubuntu
On 02/21/2011 01:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
Hi Peter,
On Mon, Feb 21, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Peter Junge snipped wrote:
On 02/21/2011 04:18 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
SCIM is AFAIK really outdated.
SCIM works fine, worked fine for the past years.
...
Florian, you need to update the new StartCom Certs to include
libreoffice.org.
www.libreoffice.org uses an invalid security certificate.
The certificate is only valid for the following names:
*.documentfoundation.org , documentfoundation.org
(Error code: ssl_error_bad_cert_domain)
On 02/25/2011 12:30 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Which site did you open? Seems to work here?
NoOp wrote on 2011-02-25 21.25:
Florian, you need to update the new StartCom Certs to include
libreoffice.org.
http://www.libreoffice.org/
Click on Download
http://www.libreoffice.org/download
On 02/25/2011 12:42 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 02/25/2011 12:30 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Which site did you open? Seems to work here?
NoOp wrote on 2011-02-25 21.25:
Florian, you need to update the new StartCom Certs to include
libreoffice.org.
http://www.libreoffice.org/
Click
On 02/25/2011 01:12 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
http://img638.imageshack.us/f/screenshot6z.png/
On the tab with that page open and this url:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/installation/linux/
if I right click on 'Installation' I get this url:
https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/installation
On 02/25/2011 01:14 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 02/25/2011 01:12 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
http://img638.imageshack.us/f/screenshot6z.png/
On the tab with that page open and this url:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/installation/linux/
if I right click on 'Installation' I get this url:
https
On 02/21/2011 02:16 PM, Mark Preston wrote:
I'm about ready to load up LibreOffice and start running it for work
but have really one simple question before I do. Background is I will
be running it on Windows Vista, currently run OpenOffice and will be
using it near daily including with MS
On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
...
Interesting ! I checked this out in FF, Chromium, and Opera and at first
glance everything looked fine. However, that latest Opera contains a feature
that allows one to check security information with respect to a website, and
under the
On 02/27/2011 11:52 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/27 NoOp snipped
On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
...
That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:
http://www.libreoffice.org/assets/resized_screenshots_avoid/Screenshot-12.png
In other words, its mixed only
On 02/27/2011 01:09 PM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/27 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net
On 02/27/2011 11:52 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/2/27 NoOp snipped
On 02/27/2011 07:10 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
...
That's OK as it is pulling the images from an http vs http:
http://www.libreoffice.org
On 02/27/2011 12:15 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
Looks like a SeaMonkey profile issue. Just tried on a different machine
the regular profile gets the errors. Switched to a clean 'test'
profile and https://www.libreoffice.org/download works fine (linux). Now
I just have to find the correct mozilla
On 02/27/2011 10:47 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi,
NoOp wrote on 2011-02-27 22.52:
Found it.
security.enable.ssl2 was set to true. Reset it to false the page now
loads fine.
thanks for sharing! There are quite some other reports of issues with
the SSL certificate, so if anyone
Of late there are multiple posts on the users list regarding mail list
subscribe and unsubscribe issues.
A post back in October [tdf-discuss] Mailing list user preferences?:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.discuss/100
[Note: I tried to find the thread in:
On 03/08/2011 07:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
...
4. Why is it necesary to send an email for unsubscribe instructions?
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to users+h...@libreoffice.org
etc at all? Hello... is this some type of secret handshake that takes
place to get off of the users list?
This list
an administrative interface, where list owners
can edit some settings and (un)subscribe people. I agree that a lack of
this is really ugly. However, it needs time and resources, so if anyone
volunteers to code, let us know. :-)
NoOp wrote on 2011-03-09 04.05:
1. Why are unsubscribed posts even
On 03/09/2011 06:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
...
And you mentioned that one could have learned from OOo lists:
Ha, that is a good one. The OOo lists have explicit unsubscribe
instructions in *every* footer, but still people complain about not
knowing to unsubscribe. So having that in
On 03/10/2011 03:08 AM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
...
infrastructure budget. I'm not commenting on the language (you also
insulted me above, so don't throw the first stone), but he surely knows
what he is doing in technical terms.
My sincere apologies.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail
On 03/10/2011 02:47 PM, Friedrich Strohmaier wrote:
Hi Charles, *,
Charles Marcus schrieb:
On 2011-03-10 8:09 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
The one situation where unsubscribing is difficult is when the
reply asking for confirmation to unsubscribe is flagged as spam and
thus not sorted
On 03/10/2011 05:09 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 6:17 AM, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 03/09/2011 06:16 AM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
...
And you mentioned that one could have learned from OOo lists:
Ha, that is a good one. The OOo lists have explicit
To all the LibreOffice/TDF users/contributors in Japan areas affected
by the earthquake,
I wish you, your families, and friends well.
Gary
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Archive: http://listarchives.documentfoundation.org/www/discuss/
*** All posts
On 04/30/2011 01:56 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
Harold Fuchs wrote:
Has Oracle given permission for TDF to use its forum, or doesn't TDF need
such permission? Does TDF *want* to use an Oracle resource?
I think Drew has already explained this on multiple mailing lists,
anyway: the forums at
On 05/03/2011 02:17 AM, Manfred Usselmann wrote:
On Mon, 02 May 2011 19:49:53 -0700
NoOp...
Sorry, but I'd have to disagree...
http://openoffice.org/terms_of_use
The resources are owned and operated by Oracle.
It's no contraction that the resource is made available by Oracle and
the forum
On 05/19/2011 10:23 AM, plino wrote:
Hi Tor
Please no. We who have had to look at that codebase and even fix some
problems
in it are glad that it is abandoned. It is a huge unmaintainable pile of
XSLT,
and then some silly C# code around that.
(snip)
Furthermore, this allegedly
On 05/19/2011 11:03 AM, Andras Timar wrote:
2011/5/19 plino pedl...@gmail.com:
Then I think it's time to create a proper C/C++ ODF importer for Word. If
this worked properly then this would be a further step in promoting ODF as a
de facto open format alternative.
ODF support is present in
If you are a wikipedia member/contributor, perhaps you can have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenDocument_software
No mention of LibreOffice.
However, before updating the page, be aware of:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user/4599
On 05/19/2011 05:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
If you are a wikipedia member/contributor, perhaps you can have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenDocument_software
No mention of LibreOffice.
Thanks Dubyus:
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title
On 05/21/2011 11:04 AM, Robert Derman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 05/19/2011 05:18 PM, NoOp wrote:
If you are a wikipedia member/contributor, perhaps you can have a look at:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_OpenDocument_software
No mention of LibreOffice.
Appearantly
Is there one?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
doesn't show or refer to one.
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to discuss+h...@documentfoundation.org
Posting guidelines + more: http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette
List archive:
On 05/24/2011 11:43 PM, Volker Merschmann wrote:
Hi,
2011/5/25 NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net:
Is there one?
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
doesn't show or refer to one.
The german wiki page
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Local_Mailing_Lists/de has some
additions
quote
REDWOOD SHORES, CA--(Marketwire - Jun 1, 2011) - With today's proposal
to contribute the OpenOffice.org code to The Apache Software
Foundation's Incubator, Oracle continues to demonstrate its commitment
to the developer and open source communities. Donating OpenOffice.org to
Apache gives
On 06/01/2011 09:23 AM, M Henri Day wrote:
2011/6/1 NoOp ...
More:
http://www.marketwire.com/press-release/statements-on-openofficeorg-contribution-to-apache-nasdaq-orcl-1521400.htm
It will be interesting to see how this works out how TDF will work
with ASF.
Fascinating, NoOp
On 06/01/2011 05:53 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 09:51:09AM -0700, NoOp wrote:
...
TDF's Statement:
http://blog.documentfoundation.org/2011/06/01/statement-about-oracles-move-to-donate-openoffice-org-assets-to-the-apache-foundation/
TDF's statement included :
Today
On 06/02/2011 03:14 AM, plino wrote:
Another interesting article (especially the comments on the post and the
answers by Rob Weir)
http://www.robweir.com/blog/2011/06/apache-openoffice.html
...
Marbux speaks out:
http://www.itworld.com/marbux
(Paul E. (Marbux) Merrell, J.D. )
commenting on:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
will keep :/
Interesting...
Could you clarify that statement?
1. @ASF: What happens to OOo if ASF votes *not*
On 06/07/2011 01:01 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
...
Apologies if this may have already been asked answered. If so, can
someone point me to the appropriate messages within the hundreds of posts
many, many threads on the ASF incubator list, or on this list?
Well, as much letters I spend on the
Repeat.
On 06/06/2011 06:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
will keep :/
Interesting...
Could you clarify
On 06/07/2011 05:26 PM, Greg Stein wrote:
On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 21:05, NoOp gl...@sbcglobal.net wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one promise I fully expect Oracle
On 06/08/2011 08:59 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:04 PM, NoOp wrote:
Repeat.
On 06/06/2011 06:05 PM, NoOp wrote:
On 06/04/2011 05:10 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
...
Whether OOo lives or dies in Apache, Oracle has made it abundantly
clear that this is it... This is one
On 06/11/2011 04:47 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
...
I think the picture is clear enough; I'll have a word on the developers list
and try to disable the Adabas D driver.
Please don't.
$ cat /etc/adabasrc
DBROOT=/opt/adabas
DBCONFIG=${DBCONFIG:-${HOME}/.adabas}
On 06/11/2011 01:45 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
...
Where did you find your download copy ? Is it recent ?
I had a look at the official website here :
http://www.softwareag.com/Corporate/products/adabas/rela_3rd_prod/adad/default.asp
and there's no download link.
The Download free Adabas D
On 06/11/2011 11:02 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 10:41:54AM -0700, NoOp wrote:
On 06/11/2011 04:47 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
I think the picture is clear enough; I'll have a word on the developers
list
and try to disable the Adabas D driver.
Please don't
On 06/11/2011 12:42 PM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 11:47:54AM -0700, NoOp wrote:
I'd experimented with Adabas D with OpenOffice.org. Unfortunately, I
can't test with LO due to not being able to use *any* data source:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32948
On 06/12/2011 01:43 AM, Francois Tigeot wrote:
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 10:31:28AM +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Le 12/06/11 03:04, Uwe Altmann a écrit :
Meanwhile Adabas is a legacy product. I wonder if anyone uses it in a
productive environment. Surely not on a Mac.
As has been
Florian,
Any idea when the issue with posting to the user list
(gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user) ala your change from
@libreoffice.org to @global.libreoffice.org will be fixed? On that list
you are still missing contributions from gmane user/contributors. I
would have expected that
On 06/13/2011 11:29 PM, Florian Effenberger wrote:
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote on 2011-06-14 03.00:
Any idea when the issue with posting to the user list
(gmane.comp.documentfoundation.libreoffice.user) ala your change from
@libreoffice.org to @global.libreoffice.org will be fixed? On that list
On 06/15/2011 08:20 AM, Marc Paré wrote:
Le 2011-06-15 10:09, plino a écrit :
Nabble posts are working.
Thanks ;)
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Ping-Florian-nntp-gmane-posts-to-user-list-still-not-getting-to-the-list-tp3061361p3067421.html
Sent
In the past I'd answered a few questions regarding OOo ECCN[1] and
pointed the poster to Sun's ECCN[2]. What are the implications for LO
general with regards to ECCN? I do see that Novell/Attachmate Group do
list an ECCN for LO[3] with a category of 5D992.
Given that questions eventually will
On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote:
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF is the best solution to distribute final
versions
of text (and maybe other
On 07/04/2011 04:07 PM, Robert Derman wrote:
NoOp wrote:
On 06/25/2011 03:37 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 7:37 AM, Simon Phipps si...@webmink.com wrote:
On 25 Jun 2011, at 08:33, Ian Lynch wrote:
Manfred wrote:
I still believe that PDF
On 07/07/2011 12:05 PM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hi Gary,
NoOp wrote (07-07-11 19:52)
On 07/07/2011 06:19 AM, Cor Nouws wrote:
Can you please explain how you create a text box in Writer, that you can
rotate? Did you do that via copy/paste with Draw?
View|Toolbars|Drawing
Click on the 'T'|write
On 07/16/2011 06:53 PM, Marc Paré wrote:
I have just installed Mageia Linux on a couple of boxes and due to the
fact that some of the websites the owners of these boxes wish to access
work best with sun java, I removed java openjdk. This then led to a
warning that the Oracle report builder
On 07/18/2011 05:12 PM, Robert Boehm wrote:
On 07/18/2011 07:04 PM, plino wrote:
Robert Boehm wrote:
Obviously, if the version preferred by the installer is the only
version that the installed files will work with
is the only choice, then well, OK. But if it's compatible with the
latest
On 07/18/2011 06:07 PM, plino wrote:
NoOp wrote:
I'd recommend a followup to the dev list. plino, when you do that you
might also add links to the security notices for the earlier version of
VC++ 2008.
The Dev list is for devs only. I have unsubscribed from it.
I got crap for posting
On 08/01/2011 03:42 AM, Peter Hillier-Brook wrote:
Given that the release of LibreOffice 3.4.2 is targeted at enterprise
users, I find it surprising that the product is thought to be ready for
release. At lease 2 significant bugs have been introduced and remain
present that would, to my
On 08/23/2011 01:47 PM, Sveinn í Felli wrote:
Sorry if this is not the proper list to ask, but before
filing a bug I'd like to know if someone has seen this before:
The following .doc file does open correctly in
OpenOffice.org 3.3.0 and OpenOffice.org 3.2.1 but neither in
LibreOffice
On 09/05/2011 07:19 AM, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
Hello,
I waht to invite you to our Monthly bug Hunting Session, what sill start
tomorrow, Tuesday 2011-09-06 at 13:00 UTC.
...
Rainer,
You may find this helpful when making these type of announcements:
For those that continue to insist on top posting on the LO lists: please
consider bottom posting with interspersed replies.
I realiz(s)e that the existing:
http://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/
doesn't specifically clarify anything with regards to top/bottom
posting. However at the
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
