Hi to all..
Is there any way to change the first day of week in the datepicker plugin?
I've been trying with no success..
Any one can help?
thanx..
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Just throwing a little fuel on the fire. If anybody cares give this a
whirl -- build your own custom jQuery.
Maybe I'll figure out how to do plugins if anyone is interested.
http://corey.jquery.com/cgi-bin/make.cgi
Corey
On Nov 14, 2006, at 9:32 PM, John Resig wrote:
I definitely agree.
Gilles,
Is there any new information about this?
Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven wrote:
Hi Guys,
You've probaly seen the Ajaxian post on the YUI dialog. Well i am happy
to report that i've almost completed my plugin (after i released
cssHover i did a complete rewrite) and it offers
Nice! Almost Flash-like!
Greased Lightbox... Nice!
For those who want more info about it, and its Greasemonkey script, go here:
http://shiftingpixel.com/lightbox/
Stefan,
Excellent work yet again!
Stefan Petre wrote:
http://interface.eyecon.ro/development/demos/carousel.html
Brujah wrote:
I am trying to write a draggable notepad.
I use a textarea where the user can enter data.
It basically works, but while I move the box the text is not displayed.
What could be the problem here?
The code is small:
If you are looking for a CMS that is powered by jQuery, Drupal version
5 (currently in Beta) is using jQuery as it's core JS library, and is
integrating it into the main API. For example, to add a jQuery
function you use the drupal_add_js hook in Drupal:
?php
drupal_add_js (
I was looking at the toggleClass method in the API, and it says this:
jQuerytoggleClass( String class )
Adds the specified class if it is present, removes it if it is not
present.
[...]
Is this a genuine typo or am I missing something? :o)
It looks very much like a typo.
On Nov 14, 2006, at 23:46, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps a download configuration tool similar to what is offered
with the interface plug-in? Allowing the user to choose the modules
he/she needs, thus creating their customized baseline JQuery file
on the fly, would be great!
IMO a
I'm personally not sure that the entire ajax.js should be part of the
core. jQuery to me is about DOM searching and manipulation. Its Ajax
features are excellent, but I wouldn't cry at all if I had to include
the ajax plugin or official extension or whatever you'd like to
call it, only when
Strip the redundancy - excellent idea.
On 15/11/06, John Resig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) Strip out all helper functions into an external plugin.
2) Change the official (in SVN) plugins to no longer use the helpers.
3) Change all docs to no longer use the helpers.
Towards the top of this
This seemed to be a bug that affected several apps so I wanted to let
the list know I just posted a fix to SVN.
http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/276/
Please test if you can because 1.0.4 is coming soon and we don't want
to introduce bugs or cause problems with any existing plugins.
Good work
I was just thinking the same thing.
Would this be possible?
The file names would need to be consistent so that a plug in could require
jquery+ajax+forms.js or something like that. Version numbers could get
tricky.
Another point: It would be nice to see from the filename if the content is
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:24:12 -0500
Von: Rey Bango [EMAIL PROTECTED]
An: jQuery Discussion. discuss@jquery.com
Betreff: Re: [jQuery] jQuery 1.1 by the end of Nov
The main suggestion I would have is that if you remove something, make
it available in
I recently had the wish for extended functions on arrays, hashs and
objects
like Prototype provides with extending the Array() object. I often used
features like without() and truncate(). I am really thinking of
rewriting/porting a lot of stuff for jQuery and call it jQuery Methods,
but I
On 13/11/06, henrah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Sam.
That sounds like a good compromise. I've never seen that method to get
the current scripts file name. Does it work in most browsers (inc IE
5.5+)?
Actually, after a quick trawl through MSDN, I don't think the fileName
property on
Jörn,you're true about that, but there are many who actually do it this way, and I don't want to write a plugin for us geeks only :-)As I am trying out now, $A([1,2,3,4,5]).without(1) seems to work quite well. Even chaining does work then.
2006/11/15, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I recently
This just seems likely to generate a lot of extra support problems on
the mailing list. Can't we just leave it up to people to build their
own if they really want to cut it down below 20K?
Good idea! Provide the full package, including DOM, event, FX and AJAX, as
default, and give a
It would be really nice if there was a search box. Perhaps as we type only
the results that start with the string we type will remain, thus making it
a
lot faster to find what we are looking for. Scrolling can take a while,
typing is fast. Just me 2 cents.
The more money, the better!
That
Right now, the jQuery compressed build is teetering around 18-19KB, I
really want to try and cut this down. Any thoughts on particular
features that should be extracted into a plugin?
I know the macros don't account for _that_ much core code but they do
complicate the documentation
I often times just need to know the value of one form element and
sometimes that could be a group of radio buttons, a select, a multiple
select or just a regular input. The current $.val() method is limited
only to inputs. I was curious if anyone else needed this funtionality
and if it
For radios/checkboxes: Can we rely on searching for siblings? Or do we need
to search for the name inside the current form?
No, we can't! There may be labels around it or divs/lis whatever in
between... It should search for the name in the document!
-- Klaus
Dunno how to handle the current oneEvents like oneclick: Extending bind with
an additonal parameter for the number of events to handle before the handler
should be removed would be one way, another to add a bindAmount() or binds().
Allowing a number of events to be defined before handler is
If you are looking for a CMS that is powered by jQuery, Drupal version
5 (currently in Beta) is using jQuery as it's core JS library, and is
integrating it into the main API.
Same story for SPIP : the next version will be fully jquery-aware.
-- Fil
For radios/checkboxes: Can we rely on searching for siblings? Or do we
need to search for the name inside the current form?
No, we can't! There may be labels around it or divs/lis whatever in
between... It should search for the name in the document!
But the document may contain other
Hi Folks,
Ok, I am being stupid and can't work this out and it's probably so
simple. What I want to do is keep my site XHTML valid, so I don't
want target= params in any of my links, I want to use jQuery to take
the href param from any clicked link with rel=nofollow which only my
external links
Dunno how to handle the current oneEvents like oneclick: Extending bind
with an additonal parameter for the number of events to handle before the
handler should be removed would be one way, another to add a bindAmount() or
binds().
Allowing a number of events to be defined before handler
Quick shot (not tested):$(document).ready( function(){$([EMAIL PROTECTED]).click( function() { window.open(this.href) }); });Use this to refer to clicked a element.
2006/11/15, digital spaghetti [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Folks,Ok, I am being stupid and can't work this out and it's probably
On 15/11/06, digital spaghetti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Folks,
Ok, I am being stupid and can't work this out and it's probably so
simple. What I want to do is keep my site XHTML valid, so I don't
want target= params in any of my links, I want to use jQuery to take
the href param from any
What about using an object instead of an array?
bind(click, handler, 1, {x: 1});
bind(click, handler, {x: 1});
...
Nandi
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jörn Zaefferer
Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2006 1:22 PM
To: jQuery Discussion.
Hi,
i was searching for a way to abort an existing ajax request, not on
timeout but explicitly and i did not find anyone.
I propose to let the ajax function return the XMLHttpRequest object.
This light change would allow to abort the request.
To have this feature working for all ajax request,
Thanks guys, I forgot to mention I had also tried this.href, but it
didn't work either, but I had it in so thats probably why. I knew
I got the basic idea, it was just me being stupid :)
Thanks again.
Tane
On 11/15/06, Dragan Krstic [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
$(document).ready(
Since this has come up again, I thought I'd mention - despite my distate
for plugin pimping - my own event++ system (
http://jquery.offput.ca/event++ ) I wrote which could be used as the new
system. It can handle additional arguments sent to the event simply by
adding arguments to the event
I actually probably should have explicitly showed the syntax for my
event number handling technique. I used an optional first argument which
defined that. If the first argument isn't a number then it doesn't need
to worry about that and just goes through with a regular event bind.
Hi Blair!
Since this has come up again, I thought I'd mention - despite my distate
for plugin pimping - my own event++ system (
http://jquery.offput.ca/event++ ) I wrote which could be used as the new
system. It can handle additional arguments sent to the event simply by
adding arguments
Once, when this.href didn't worked for me, I got url by innerHTML, but all links was a href="">2006/11/15, digital spaghetti
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:Thanks guys, I forgot to mention I had also tried
this.href, but itdidn't work either, but I had it in so thats probably why.I knewI got the basic idea,
Well hello right back Jörn!
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Hi Blair!
Since this has come up again, I thought I'd mention - despite my distate
for plugin pimping - my own event++ system (
http://jquery.offput.ca/event++ ) I wrote which could be used as the new
system. It can handle additional
And to correct myself, my system didn't do that and it will not do that.
In fact the arguments sent into the trigger call have precedence and in
retrospect that makes some semblance of sense to me. So my below trigger
example actually does this:
$().trigger('click',arg5,arg6);
// fn1 runs with
Hi all,
here's a problem I don't understand. I'm currentlx fixing my
history/remote plugin for IE and what I need to do is adding to history
only if a true click ocurred and not a triggered one. That works quite
good by checking e.clientX.
But in IE I found some strange behaviour, or I just
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
For radios/checkboxes: Can we rely on searching for siblings? Or do we
need to search for the name inside the current form?
No, we can't! There may be labels around it or divs/lis whatever in
between... It should search for the name in the document!
But the
The way I coded the trigger and handle functions in my system it worked
like this (or at least it should. This is untested but theoretically
sound and the way I intended for it to work).
$().click(fn1,arg1,arg2);
$().click(fn2,arg3,arg4);
// someone clicks there
// fn1 runs with
Forget about that immediatly! I checked for e in the callback of a
load() function which causes that strange behaviour...
Seems to be a closure problem: The parameter of the outer function gets
not into the scope of the inner closure, which I thought it would do:
$(this).click(function(e) {
Currently val() is only a shortcut, but doesn't encapsulate anything
useful. It would be nice to have it handling some more stuff.
I wouldn't like to have it in an external plugin, that makes it difficult
to access or find it when you actually need that functionality.
Right now val() is a
Forget about that immediatly! I checked for e in the callback of a
load() function which causes that strange behaviour...
Seems to be a closure problem: The parameter of the outer function gets
not into the scope of the inner closure, which I thought it would do:
Klaus
Hartlwrote:
I
think, the correct way to select namespaced elements in CSS is this:
table[my|data-url]
So in jQuery I guess it would be:
$('table[my|@data-url]')
There is another recent thread discussing support for
namespaces...
I understand the
CSS selector and have read the
On 11/15/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seemed to be a bug that affected several apps so I wanted to let
the list know I just posted a fix to SVN.
http://jquery.com/dev/bugs/bug/276/
Please test if you can because 1.0.4 is coming soon and we don't want
to introduce
Hi Dave!
Currently val() is only a shortcut, but doesn't encapsulate anything
useful. It would be nice to have it handling some more stuff.
I wouldn't like to have it in an external plugin, that makes it
difficult
to access or find it when you actually need that functionality.
Right
I understand the CSS selector and have read the other thread but a true
namespace selection based on xpath syntax doesn't work. As for writing a
plug-in, I believe the issue could be corrected with a change to a regular
expression. But, reg exps are, by their nature, difficult for me to
Anyone needing the compatibility can simply remap $ like this after
loading jQuery:
var $J = jQuery;
$ = _$;
I think other libraries would be nice to provide such an easy way to
make them compatible with jQuery and others.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 11/13/06, henrah [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi
On 11/15/06, Paul Bakaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Even chaining does work then.
chaining... :)
--
Brandon Aaron
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Seems to be a closure problem: The parameter of the outer function
gets not into the scope of the inner closure, which I thought it would do:
$(this).click(function(e) {
$(this).load(url, function() {
// where's e?
});
});
Here's my guess.
jQuery's event handling
:Pby the way, there's a first version in the SVN, in plugins/methods ! Feel free to add something.2006/11/15, Brandon Aaron [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:On 11/15/06, Paul Bakaus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote: Even chaining does work then. chaining... :)--Brandon
Jörn Zaefferer schrieb:
$(this).click(function(e) {
$(this).load(url, function() {
// where's e?
});
});
Can somebody explain that to me?
I can get away with:
$(this).click(function(e) {
var trueClick = e.clientX;
$(this).load(url, function() {
bmsterling wrote:
Hey all,
Attached is a function that I currently use to take the results of an xml
import and put it into an array that I can use thru-out the code.
you will see some function in there like getChildNodesByAttribute,
getAttribute and getElementsByTagName, these are
Gilles,
I really appreciate the hard work you're putting into this plug-in. It
sounds like it's gonna be awesome! I too would love to know the status
of the plug-in. :o)
Chris
Dan Atkinson wrote:
Gilles,
Is there any new information about this?
Webunity | Gilles van den Hoven wrote:
by the way, there's a first version in the SVN, in plugins/methods ! Feel
free to add something.
I took a look at your implementation: It looks like you are extending a String
or Array object instead of it's prototype.
Won't that cause the same problems when used with for-in loops?
--
Jörn
Personally, I'm noticing a lot of requests for XML namespace selection in
the parser. Can we get that into 1.1? Apperently, making $('myns:div')
would raise holy hell because it would clash with the pseudos, but
$('myns|div') might be doable.
Can we make $('myns:div') work if there's no pseudo
Without sounding rude, I don't think I would ever use this and I don't
think most developers would either. We need jQuery to be small and
flexible, not a huge bloated framework like some of the other
libraries (that I will leave nameless)... Maybe extending jQuery, or
building a plug-in may be the
Thanks
Brandon. I'm just an idiot, and didn't see that Erik had already
responded last night, :0/
Anyway, I appreciate the possible alternative solution.
Chris
Brandon Aaron wrote:
I believe the solution provided should work:
$("#id").val("");
and if it actually doesn't you could try:
Klaus Hartl wrote:
Stephen Woodbridge schrieb:
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
I understand the CSS selector and have read the other thread but a
true namespace selection based on xpath syntax doesn't work. As
for writing a plug-in, I believe the issue could be corrected with
a change to a regular
Thanks
Erik, I completely missed the fact that you'd responded. **sheepish
grin**
I appreciate the help. :o)
Chris
Erik Beeson wrote:
You don't want empty(), you want to set the value of the
textarea to an empty string. Try (untested):
$("#id").val("");
empty() is for removing child
Title: Why does this code not work?
Hi, all
Trying to grasp js and jQuerywhy wont this code work?
(No response on my test page at all to the code)
JQuery code:
$(document).ready(function() {
$(div.ann).find(p.title).hide().end().find(p.text).click(function() {
var answer =
I'm trying to do what I thought was pretty simple:
$(#id).empty();
where #id is the id of a textarea. I'd like to clear out the text
area when my ajax call returns.
What am I doin' wrong?
bump...
Can anybody help with this?
Please provide some more information: What
Jörn Zaefferer wrote:
Currently val() is only a shortcut, but doesn't encapsulate anything useful.
It would be nice to have it handling some more stuff.
I wouldn't like to have it in an external plugin, that makes it difficult to
access or find it when you actually need that functionality.
Personally, I'm noticing a lot of requests for XML namespace selection
in
the parser. Can we get that into 1.1? Apperently, making $('myns:div')
would raise holy hell because it would clash with the pseudos, but
$('myns|div') might be doable.
+1 for namespace selection.
In one of
Without sounding rude, I don't think I would ever use this and I don't
think most developers would either. We need jQuery to be small and
flexible, not a huge bloated framework like some of the other
libraries (that I will leave nameless)... Maybe extending jQuery, or
building a plug-in
Stephen Woodbridge wrote:
(...)
Or escape the expression so we know it is explicitly XPath, or provide
a separate function that is dedicated to XPath.
-Steve
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Both
I'm not finding any methods for editing stylesheets.
I'd like to change a style as it is defined in the document.
--
Alan Gutierrez - 504 717 1428 - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://blogometer.com/
Think New Orleans - http://thinknola.com/
On 15/11/06, Rick Faircloth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, all…
Trying to grasp js and jQuery…why won't this code work?
(No response on my test page at all to the code…)
JQuery code:
$(document).ready(function() {
$(div.ann).find(p.title).hide().end().find(p.text).click(function() {
Yep. I used my patch to write an additional plugin that allowed:$(div[height10])which allows selectors based on CSS attributes. It'd be really easy to extend jQuery to include any other type of selector, as long as you built the appropriate RegExp parser. And it's only 43 *bytes*
-- YehudaOn
I'm not suggesting bloat here, Rik. I think that, at the very least,
support for $('myns|whatever') is core stuff, and is doable without a lot
of code. Since it's about the basic functionality of selection, I think
that it's one of the few things that *shouldn't* be a plugin.
I won't have time
Just a thought:You could put up a survey online asking:1. What should the maximum size of jQuery be with these modules (list current)? [enter number]2. Which modules do you think could be abstracted out of the core into plugins to save space? [checkboxes]
3. etc.Of course, this info doesn't make
When I did this:
$(#someInput).val();
it made it null in FF but in IE it left it alone.
How do I use val() to erase the current value?
Glen
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
Even if it is 10-15 lines, it's still lines I, and most developers,
will never ever use. jQuery should be for the everyday basics, and the
plug-ins are there to extend the base.
On 15/11/06, Brian Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not suggesting bloat here, Rik. I think that, at the very
On Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:07 AM Alan Gutierrez said:
I'm not finding any methods for editing stylesheets.
I'd like to change a style as it is defined in the document.
That's probably because there are none. You don't (can't?) modify the
.css file directly with js. Instead you modify
*raises hand*
Yea, that'd be nice... I expected $.val() to return the value of any and
all form elements, and was disappointed to find out otherwise.
-ALEX
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Brandon Aaron
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2006
* Chris W. Parker [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-15 11:56]:
On Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:07 AM Alan Gutierrez said:
I'm not finding any methods for editing stylesheets.
I'd like to change a style as it is defined in the document.
That's probably because there are none. You don't
Chris W. Parker schrieb:
On Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:07 AM Alan Gutierrez said:
I'm not finding any methods for editing stylesheets.
I'd like to change a style as it is defined in the document.
That's probably because there are none. You don't (can't?) modify the
.css file
Hey,
I am trying to use the console script in IE but it gives me a TypeError
message. 'window.top.deBugWindow.document; is null or not an object
I am using like:
console.log(start init());
Is there anything else i need to do to use this?
Any help would be great.
--
View this message
It is not all that easy to make cross-browser. Here is a snippet I
wrote to do this ...
http://www.nabble.com/Style-sheet-modification-snippet-tf2484859.html#a6928891
--
Brandon Aaron
On 11/15/06, Alan Gutierrez [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not finding any methods for editing stylesheets.
I'd
I have to
admit, I didn't understand that $.val() was limited to only input
elements, and I expected it to get the value of any element.
The API says that $.val() will:
Get the current value of the first matched element.
The API says that $.val( string ) will:
Set the value of every
I think that when newcomers find JQ, their default experience should pretty inclusive, i.e., definitely Ajax and Effects. That way, people won't be frustrated by the I saw it in the API but can't get it to work factor, and will be more likely to continue on to discover more jQuery goodness.
How
On Wednesday, November 15, 2006 9:05 AM Alan Gutierrez said:
You can redefine css rules programatically. I've done so here...
http://blogometer.com/repository/etude/jQuery/grid/grid.html
Interesting!
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
* Klaus Hartl [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2006-11-15 12:15]:
Chris W. Parker schrieb:
On Wednesday, November 15, 2006 8:07 AM Alan Gutierrez said:
I'm not finding any methods for editing stylesheets.
I'd like to change a style as it is defined in the document.
That's probably because
I'd like to create a Grid for my application.
I've started here...
http://blogometer.com/repository/etude/jQuery/grid/grid.html
...with the first issue being one of sizing the columns. I'm doing
this by applying a class to each column and heading in an HTML table
and then adjusting the rules of
In an expression like this:
myns|[EMAIL PROTECTED]|attr=whatever]
How does myns get associated with the actual XML namespace URI?
getElementByTagNameNS needs the URI, not the name. I have not needed
namespaces before so I am not familiar with how that would work.
As for how much code it takes,
The API says that $.val() will:
Get the current value of the first matched element.
Yes, it is equivalent to $().attr(value) so it gets the value attribute of
the first element.
The API says that $.val( string ) will:
Set the value of every matched element.
Yes, it will set
Title: Re: [jQuery-es] Cambiar cosas cuando la página cargue
Hola Choan:
Empecemos por definir las variables y ahorrar caracteres. Ese `divs =
new Array()` me provoca ardor de estómago.
var divs = [ el-id-de-un-div, el-id-de-otro-div, etc. ];
Luego: `$(divs[activediv])` no va a
On 11/15/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
My conclusion so far: Add attrs(), remove val() and other shortcuts, and allow them via a shortcut function.I agree with this, I think this is the direction to go.-js
___
jQuery mailing list
What about select-multiple?
This, of course, does not work. val() will return the value of the
first selected option in this case.
Also note that simply adding a value attribute to something like a div
won't work cross-browser.
Mike
___
jQuery
attr is not an alternative to val. It flat out won't work in FF for
textareas, selects or anything w/o a true value attribute.
Oops. My apologies. I was using a 1.0 version of jQuery for my test.
Ignore the above.
___
jQuery mailing list
I'm just going to reply to myself ... I'm a little confused by the
proposal of an .attrs() method and it seems unnecessary and using
selectors is more than I want to remember or type. Getting ride of
.val() is fine by me but there *needs* to be a method to serialize a
single form element. Could
Hopefully you put the jQuery code in the head section between
script../script and after script
src=where/you/put/jquery.js/script
Hi, all.
Trying to grasp js and jQuery.why won't this code work?
(No response on my test page at all to the code.)
JQuery code:
$(document).ready(function() {
I'm just going to reply to myself ... I'm a little confused by the
proposal of an .attrs() method and it seems unnecessary and using
selectors is more than I want to remember or type. Getting ride of
.val() is fine by me but there *needs* to be a method to serialize a
single form element.
What exactly do you mean when you say the handler doesn't know which
argument is passed via trigger versus bind? Can you give me an example
of this so I can better understand the problem?
I try. I take my tooltip plugin as an example, because I can avoid binding
stuff to DOM elements.
Hi Guys,
I forgot to add one fix to SVN, its comitted now.
-- Gilles
___
jQuery mailing list
discuss@jquery.com
http://jquery.com/discuss/
On 11/15/06, Reynier Perez Mira [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
¿Qué se supone que haga esta función y donde debo ponerla? La entendí más o
menos pero algunas cosas no me quedaron claras del todo.
Esa función debes ponerla en un archivo javascript que debes linkar en
tu página web por medio del
On 11/15/06, Jörn Zaefferer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Won't that cause the same problems when used with for-in loops?
Yes, but only on the object itself and for/in shouldn't be used for
arrays. I don't believe there should be a conflict.
___
jQuery
I propose we break these out into their own plugins. Have a
plugins/methods/strings, plugins/methods/arrays, etc.
--
Brandon Aaron
On 11/15/06, Paul Bakaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
:P
by the way, there's a first version in the SVN, in plugins/methods ! Feel
free to add something.
From: Kevin Old
I'm parsing some json successfully below, but I'd like to be
able access the contents of the json object like
this.[id] or this.[name].
function processData(json) {
$.each(json, function(i) {
$(#names).append(ID: + this[0] +
For the archives, I was actually able to get what I want. I didn't
have valid key/value pairs in JSON, was just passing around an array.
I was able to change the append line to this:
$(#names).append(ID: + this.id + Name: + this.name +
Passwd: + this.password + Url: + this.email_address
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
