Does anyone know whether a serial Midi interface would work on the original
serial port of a Powerbook G3 Wallstreet? Getting a USB to serial adapter
will probably cost just as much as a new MIDI interface, so that's not
really an option.
Johannes
On 10.08.2003 15:08 Uhr, RockyRoad wrote
Does
On 13.08.2003 23:58 Uhr, Fisher, Allen wrote
I recently asked if anyone had one of these printers. (to recap, it's a 1200
dpi PS3 laser that does large format paper for $600) I went ahead and took
the plunge and bought it. It seems pretty well contsructed, is USB 2.0 and
the prints I've
I know this has come up before, but I never needed to pay attention until now!
My printer's (NEC 1450N) been acting up big time as far as paper feed, and it's making me crazy. I'm thinking of getting a new laser, probably HP. However, do I need it to "speak" PostScript? I paid a lot extra for
If we switch to Fin04, *we can't go back*!!!
The technology to go back can and will be developed (if needed) as a
plug-in, even if Finale dies. In fact, MusicXML already provides backwards
compatibility to an amazing extent.
Cheers,
Tobias
___
Finale
the PIRATES and THEIR customers aren't gonna be inconvenienced by
the copy protection, while we loyal MakeMusic customers ARE
inconvenienced.
--
David H. Bailey
I had vowed to stay out of this argument, but I can't help but notice
that this argument is identical to that used by the gun lobby
The Dover edition is the Berlioz/Strauss edition.
Ray Horton wrote:
Is that the edition with the Richard Strauss additions?
- Original Message -
From: David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: John Howell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 14, 2003 6:42 AM
On Behalf Of Craig Parmerlee
I think what I would like to do is to combine the
same-family instruments (all the trumpets on one staff, e.g.). But I
insist that each trumpeter (e.g.) gets only his/her own part.
If I'm understanding you correctly, you'll want to check the *leave original
I typically do the score doubling up parts on staves as needed. If there are solos or
unisons, I use note-attached exps to denote them. I used to use meas-attached, but
since Tobias introduced Smart Part Extraction I use note-attached because SPE works so
well with them.
To extract the parts,
... a clause which removes all liability from the
publisher of the product ...
In addition, if software activation is stopped after
a few years, then that is purposeful sabotage on the part
of the publisher, and no license agreement in the world
can make that legal. They are liable, sure they
At 02:26 PM 8/13/2003 -0500, Richard Huggins wrote:
Maybe I'm not getting something, but ...
You mentioned that you have everything on separate staves at the moment--why
wouldn't you extract those into parts before combining them? If you did,
then you're only dealing with the implosion issue
Le 08/08/03 09:41, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit:
At 02:35 PM 8/8/03 +0200, d. collins wrote:
And what about installing it and using on a laptop with no internet
connection? Is that easily done?
Does that mean this is okay with you? Not even a whisper of protest?
Everybody
At 12:50 AM 8/8/03 +0200, Jari Williamsson wrote:
I've now put a Finale 2004 review with some tips on the tips site. I'll
correct all the typos tomorrow...
http://www.finaletips.nu/
Here I find:
Finale 2004 has copy protection. You can read how it works on MakeMusic!'s
own site.
I go there and
In the back-and-forth about the appropriateness of adding a copy-protection
scheme to Finale, the discussion of the PACE system and its worm dropped
through the cracks.
It would seem to be a prerequisite to further discussion to know--from the
people who actually wrote the code, not some
I have seen 2nd x only much more than 1st x tacet. I also think it
conveys intent better and quicker. As for font style, that's subjective to
the style preferred by the publisher, if there is one. Personally I use 12
pt italics plain and have seen that used quite a bit.
Richard
From: Aaron
The promo code was sent in an e-mail (you may already have received it
by now) -- it does NOT lower the price below $89.
Mario Aschauer wrote:
Dear fellow listers,
I might have missed something: what exactly is a promo code?
Does it make the upgrade any cheaper than $89? I for one
- Original Message -
From: Nick Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 6:58 PM
Subject: [Finale] Ted Ross reprint
I'm talking to the publisher of The Art
of Music Engraving and Processing by
Ted Ross about a reprint and I wanted to
ask the list
On Wednesday, Aug 6, 2003, at 11:16 US/Pacific, Richard Huggins wrote:
Apparently, if you can at least run system 9.0.4, you can use this
upgrade even though some features may not be available to you. This is
good for anyone like me with a dinosaur Mac that can't run OS X.
I believe it's
Robert:
The statement is correct so long as you keep
your current computer (actually optionally 2
of em) running as long as you live. But most
people upgrade computers periodically, or have
hard drive crashes, etc. When that happens, you'll
have to get a new reg code, and that means MM
On Tuesday, August 5, 2003, at 12:52 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/4/03 6:31:27 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After selecting some measures, I cannot get the dynamic placement
plug-in to place any dynamic but mf in a score.
Herman -
My understanding of the intended
Great review. Thanks!
Ray Horton
- Original Message -
From: Jari Williamsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 6:50 PM
Subject: [Finale] Finale 2004 Review
Hello!
I've now put a Finale 2004 review with some tips on the tips site. I'll
John Howell wrote:
once again, the marketing department seems determined
to ignore the educational market that should be so important to them.
The Mac version isn't shipping until October 20, much too late for
any college I know of.
I think I can state with fair certainty that the Oct. 20
At 07:18 AM 8/9/03 -0400, David H. Bailey wrote:
Could you please elaborate? What is the worm that you claim is embedded
in the PACE system, what does it do, and how would it work if we have
antivirus software on our system? Wouldn't current AV software
catch/kill the worm on our machines?
Okay, I missed it. Thanks. The release date itself still has me
down--I was hoping for a miracle I guess.
Tim
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 03:08 PM, Tobias Giesen wrote:
Hi,
the release dates are not on every page, but they are on many, right
below
the Pre-Order button. For example,
Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
After setting
booklet properties, go to the print dialog itself and set 'shrink to fit'.
Aha. That's the option I don't want. Armed with this info I got it to work in OS9, and
hopefully in OSX soon. (That is, I turned shrink to fit OFF!)
Thanks very much.
Hi all,
I'm writing out an arrangement with several repeated strains, and the
instrumentation changes slightly on the repeat. So for an instrument which
only comes in on the repeat, is it better to put '1x tacet' or '2x only'?
And is there a standard as to whether this should be roman or
Darcy James Argue wrote:
[snip]
reasonable way to transfer my old Finale files to a non-obsolete music
notation app? and, Good lord, I'm not really going to have to start
using Sibelius now, am I?
And THAT could be the scariest what-if of all!
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Although I quoted the line:
And, quite related to our field, the Berlioz/Strauss Treatise on
Instrumentation.
despite the automatic line generated by Mark's e-mail client, I did not
author it.
ns
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is an excerpt from MakeMusic techsupport (Tyler Turner) read on MM's
forum
As we explained in the FAQ, we are including a mechanism in a maintenance
release of Finale 2004 that will let you transfer the saving/printing from
one computer to another without ever contacting MakeMusic. This
Only if they're answering the phones at CodaMusic (or Net4Music or
MakeMusic) that day.
d. collins wrote:
Thanks to David for explaining the system.
Jari Williamsson:
The challenge/response system is seamless if you do the registration
over the internet. In that case, there's no extra user
Dennis,
Thanks for looking it up; it seems like there are more and more reasons to upgrade to XP.
Meanwhile, I did a restore of my entire C drive from a Norton "Ghost" backup file, and everything works fine again -- for now.
Thanks.
- Ken
I bought one of these also, and I am delighted with it. I printed a 41 page
11 x 17 score (single sided) in three minutes. I also got the duplexer. It
works but at the moment I only have 24lb. paper and it tends to wrinkle. I
am assuming that 32 lb. paper will not wrinkle. It can also handle 18 x
At 05:20 PM 8/6/03 -0500, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
That may be true of Opera 6. I recently upgraded to Opera 7.11 I had no
trouble viewing the site and placing an upgrade. I found the earlier Opera
7 releases practically unusable, but 7.11 is solid, as far as I can tell.
I use 7.11. Are you
Okayit is correct that I should have said that IF it was a first ending,
the designation could read Play 1st x That being corrected, I'm pretty
sure the original question referred to a situation using repeat bars only
(not a 1st/2nd ending), and in such a case all the notes *would* be seen
At 10:55 AM 8/8/03 -0500, Richard Huggins wrote:
I think Coda/MM has the right to employ some method of copy protection. If
technically they goofed by using the words no copy protection, that's a
gaffe they may already regret. Perhaps the words smart copy protection
would have been better (and I'm
At 11:47 AM -0400 8/06/03, Aaron Sherber wrote:
Now for the followup: An instrument is tacet the first time through
but actually begins playing in the pickup to the repeat -- that is,
in the first ending. Is the indication 'Play' over the pickup notes
the usual way of indicating this?
I hope Finale's system will be a user-specific
challenge/response and not a computer/specific system.
I see, like measuring nose and ears?
Or, worse yet, I certainly hope it isn't like Sibelius's system
No, it isn't. I think you can actually install it three times and all will
print and
At 11:04 PM 8/9/03 +1000, RockyRoad wrote:
PS: The system is acceptable to me. I am a
veteran of dongles (Logic), keydisks (Soundiver)
and other arcane systems. Of course the potential
demise of MakeMusic is a concern but the greater
issue their would be whether the last Finale
would continue to
My mother-in-law would most definitely dispute your statement that there
is music after rappers do their work!
So since the term music is so subjective, also must the term
musician be subjective.
And I would most definitely not put any faith in the Grammy awards as
being any real proof of
At 2:19 PM -0400 8/06/03, Tim Thompson wrote:
It sure looks like a big upgrade so far. I will be interested to
see if the MIDI workings have been redesigned, or if all of that
human playback stuff is internal.
I'm a little bothered that the web site is haphazard, and not Mac
friendly (which
On 08.08.2003 22:20 Uhr, Robert Patterson Finale wrote
It is a system-wide problem. That is, the current OSX Postscript driver does
not include booklet printing the way that for OS9 did.
Isn't it Adobe's version of the postscript driver that offered Booklet
printing on driver level? I don't
David H. Bailey wrote:
Thanks -- it seems that the only thing which has changed in the license
is that Coda has been changed to MakeMusic.
Actually, the end-user isn't in the table of contents
Obviously because it is an undocumented feature vbg.
ns
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 07:03 AM, David H. Bailey wrote:
The code entry does NOT give you a greater discount -- the price is
$89.95, with or without that code.
No, no, no. That's what I've been trying to tell you.
Without the code, the price for the upgrade from Mac Finale *2002* to
The statement is correct so long as you keep your current computer (actually
optionally 2 of em) running as long as you live. But most people upgrade computers
periodically, or have hard drive crashes, etc. When that happens, you'll have to get a
new reg code, and that means MM has to be there
I finally upgraded from WIN 97c to 2003 about three months ago. I, too,
have not received a promo!
Cecil Rigby
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Richard Yates [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And I have received no e-mail promo at all [snip]
Anyone else receive no promo?
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 06:42 PM, Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 06:14 PM 8/6/2003, Éric Dussault wrote:
Wouldn'd it have been great if the Finale 2004 advertisement on
MakeMusic's
website could be made so they can be viewed by a macintosh computer.
All the
sound samples with soundfonts and
A co-worker insists that a deejay is a musician. I say that is a
load, that at most he is perhaps an editer or producer.
Can a legitimate case be made in his defense?
Absolutelyl not! He does not create or recreate music, he uses
other people's music.
John
So whose music is that scratchy
Begin forwarded message:
From: Robert Patterson Finale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu Aug 7, 2003 10:57:01 AM US/Eastern
To: Finale List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Finale] TAN: OSX Booklet printing (e.g., w/ Acrobat Reader)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a followup to yesterday's thread.
Michael Matthews sent this to me personally; I suspect he intended to
post it to the list...
Original Message
And, quite related to our field, the Berlioz/Strauss Treatise on
Instrumentation.
I for one would be interested in an updated version of Ross, though I
do have a
On Thursday, August 7, 2003, at 12:54 AM, Rich Caldwell wrote:
Anyway, if you're registered on the site, it should know what version
you have so the promo code is kind of useless (I think).
The promo code isn't useless for Coda because most people won't even
see it. I would have missed it for
I'm talking to the publisher of The Art
of Music Engraving and Processing by
Ted Ross about a reprint and I wanted to
ask the list for your input. Would you
like to see a hardcover reprint?...
new content?... or do you already have
a copy and you don't care? All thoughts
and comments welcome!
Tobias Giesen writes:
I'm sure these people will
make Finale survive, including older versions.
Yes, a thing that seem to support this is the fact that you can still
download patches for very old Finale versions, such as Finale 2.2.
Many companies only provides download of fixes for the last
Craig Parmerlee:
I want to know how others approach organizing the instruments on
their scores. I have done mainly small ensembles in the past. ...
Right now I'm working on an orchestration for full symphony
orchestra + jazz combo + several other instruments not normally in
an orchestral
At 11:11 AM 8/6/2003, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
This really is me talking, for some reason my emailer thinks it's a quote:
I prefer 2nd X only rather than 2x only, as it won't be confused
with Two times only, and Tacet 1st X is a negative, which seems
to take more brain power to process.
Yes,
On Wednesday, August 6, 2003, at 01:02 PM, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
At 3:37 PM -0400 8/06/03, Éric Dussault wrote:
Le 06/08/03 15:05, Christopher BJ Smith
[EMAIL PROTECTED] a
écrit:
Whee!
I also got a whopping discount ($39.95 instead of $89.95) by stating
my promotion code when they
Seriously, though, assuming you can't get to a performance, what would
help
you?
You needn't assume that. We have one or two venues for this sort of
entertainment in NYC.
Maybe if I go and see it in person, my opinion will change. I guess right
now it just seems too loaded with stuff
I have all spam filtering turned off at the server for my account, though.
Hmmm..
Cecil Rigby
From: Dennis Bathory-Kitsz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mine was spam-filtered because of all the HTML and internal links, but I
recovered it from the trash. Since you are Earthlink and they have
Excellent!
Jari, now that this has been announced, can you please post your review so
that we know what Fin2004 is *really* like?
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
At 04:10 PM 8/8/03 +0200, d. collins wrote:
But I'm only at the stage where I'm trying to understand what's
going on.
So I'm also very wary, and would like to know how
troublesome this one will be.
Since Makemusic chose to dissemble on their website, I don't trust them
now. Period.
Anything
Richard,
Thanks for sharing your research. I NEVER got the email invitation to
pre-order. So, I was glad to see how to get the $89.95 price at the
location you found! i guess that this means there is a new computer in
your future, or already on your desk.
Tom Jordan
On Wednesday, August 13,
There are no real rules as in a system which has been agreed upon by
international convention.
These are simply general principles that one sees in engraved music.
Many people tout them as being rules simply because that makes more
people tend to follow them and lends an air of authority to
However, if I'm going to need that sort of operability outside of
Finale, the QuicKeys upgrade ($69.95) is a lot more appealing than an
OS upgrade (reputedly $130).
Especially since the Finale upgrade ($89.95) is happening
concurrently...
-
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On
Well, I've heard several french hhh ... sorry... french hhh
... sorry ... I meant french hhhorn players that one could barely call
musicians... but we all try and some are more talented at what we do than
others. DJ's which are good can make you move and can communicate with other
Just checked out the audio demos on the Finale web site again, and they
are now mp3's, playing back great on my mac. Thanks MM.
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
Well, maybe I'm STILL not getting something, but
I'd rather not have to also do a major editing job to produce a consolidated
score.
I thought in your original message you said you had chosen to do it the way
you did. In this case, you have to consolidate the score anyway, since
you've
Copy protection in the Linux world? Now THAT's likely to succeed!
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 09.08.2003 2:06 Uhr, Noel Stoutenburg wrote
In discussing a side issue with a friend about MAC OS-X, the point was
made that MAC OS-X is a variant of UNIX. This leads me to wonder, given
that 2k4 is
On Fri, 2003-08-08 at 19:06, Noel Stoutenburg [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
In discussing a side issue with a friend about MAC OS-X, the point was
made that MAC OS-X is a variant of UNIX. This leads me to wonder, given
that 2k4 is being reconfigured to run native on Unix, er, OS-X, whether
we
At 02:19 PM 8/9/03 +0200, Tobias Giesen wrote:
but most end-user licenses I have ever read contain
a clause which removes all liability from the
publisher of the product.
Yeah but those clauses aren't valid, they are void. At
least in Europe, but it should be similar in the States.
Most
The frontpage at finalemusic.com says that Windows ships 8/20/03;
Macintosh ships 10/20/03.
Hope it actually comes out as promised... but a software release is a
little more important than a Web announcement, so it should.
-
Brad Beyenhof
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is a followup to yesterday's thread. It appears that booklet
printing is only available in OS9. (This is yet another example of
OSX not-ready-for-prime-time-ness.) In Google searches I've found
many bitter complaints that booklet printing has (so far) been
orphaned in OSX on a variety of
It was either on this list or on orchestralist where a couple of years
ago I participated in a discussion of what a composer is, and ultimately
(since there is no universally agreed upon test that a composer must
pass) there was no concensus other than a person who puts sounds
together can
And so it came to pass that On Friday, August 8, 2003, at 02:41 PM,
Tobias Giesen spake:
b) as Benjamin pointed out, making your product unusable
by refusing activation codes at some point in the future
is illegal in the States as well as in Europe.
They wont need to do this to get the
This brings up yet another legal issue that I'm not sure MakeMusic have
thought about -- if the software is registered to a specific machine,
does it remain with that machine? Talk about giving away free copies!
If I install Finale2004 on my machine and it does its electronic
handshake and
Well, that's reassuring! (not!)
Hands up, anybody who has ever owned copy-protected software (games
included) where the company has gone out of business and the copy
protection has gotten lost or destroyed?
Are we all reassued now?
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
On 09.08.2003 2:31 Uhr, Craig
Take it easy.
Why should we be disappointed or even furious?
Don't forget that estimated 70% of the use of Finale is illegal.
It is copied on music schools etc.
So far Finale did survive with their unprotected policy.
But it is wise to protect the software.
Forcing illegal customers to pay.
Ah, Keith. You must be one of the few who didn't use Atari then Emagic
Notator and had to put a dongle on the serial port [or was it joystick port
... hm Joysticks and dongles!]
I was always terrified it might go bung or I might lose it or something. My
wife used to tell people I had a $1000
I'm certain that having your final sentence in the back of their minds makes
a lot of folks more comfortable! - see snip below! Regards, Keith in OZ
But both Tobias and I can be somewhat cheerful about it, because in that
hopefully unlikely scenario, either one or both of us could fairly easily
At 10:39 AM 8/8/2003 +0200, Jari Williamsson wrote:
I noticed that the MakeMusic! marketing material for Finale 2004 only
seem to compare the SoftSynth output with normal MIDI output. No
example how a printed page would sound with human playback. So I
created such an example, which is now linked
Does anyone know whether an old serial MIDI inteface will work in OS X, and
how? Or do only USB interfaces work?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
http://www.camerata-berolinensis.de
___
Finale mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I noticed it has changed. Has it gone to a Challenge-Response system?
--
David Stonestreet - Coming to you from Sydney Australia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fleeing from the Cylon tyranny, the last Battlestar, Galactica,
leads a ragtag, fugitive fleet, on a lonely quest, for a shining
planet known as
If Grammy awards are not an authority, what makes you say your mother-in-law
is?
No logic there, sorry.
Liudas
- Original Message -
From: David H. Bailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Crystal Premo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 12:58 PM
Subject: Re:
It is a system-wide problem. That is, the current OSX Postscript driver does not
include booklet printing the way that for OS9 did.
However, Finale itself has built-in booklet printing that is (presumably) still
available in Finale 2004 even when running under OSX, and it is far superior to
If it makes anyone feel any better, there is a much worse copy protection
scheme out there than Finale 2004's challenge-response scheme, and, believe
it or not, even worse than Sibelius'.
Try upgrading Logic versions from emagic. Firstly there is a brand-new
dongle that has to be plugged into the
At 10:08 PM 8/6/03 -0400, Crystal Premo wrote:
I can be very loose about who I consider a musician, but I think
it really splits some hairs to call a playback device an instrument.
Please post an audio file of your turntable performance. :)
I just can't get my head around that concept.
Don't
Robert Patterson Finale wrote:
However, Finale itself has built-in booklet printing that is (presumably) still
available in Finale 2004 even when running under OSX, and it is far superior to that
of the OS9 Postscript driver. The only time one needs the printer driver is when one
needs
One problem that has not been mentioned (I think) is where a single
individual is responsible for multiple installations on many computers.
We are an institution where everyone (students, faculty, librarians,
etc.) has an institutional laptop. Because the laptops are mobile,
users do not use
I believe those who upgrade from 2002 pay a higher price -- they are
careful about whom they mail the upgrade notices and codes to, and keep
careful track about which version you are upgrading from. Too bad the
math on their web-site was so misleading!
I don't think the 89.95 applies to
Finale 2004 Registration FAQs
Q. Does Finale 2004 have copy protection?
A. No. It does, however, require software registration
within 30 days of installation. Failure to do so will
temporarily disable printing and saving until you do
register. You may also install Finale on two machines
(on
In FinaleScript, will it be possible to set a key combination to choose
an item from a menu? For example, a keyboard shortcut to select a
Brad, I haven't found any documentation on the FinaleScript stuff, but it
looks to me like you will be able to choose menu items by keystroke. By the
way,
Speaking from PC-ville: Booklet printing is normally available in the
printer driver. My Xerox P12 and HP1220 both have booklet creation options.
It's accessed through Acrobat Reader's 'print setup' dialog. After setting
booklet properties, go to the print dialog itself and set 'shrink to fit'.
At 08:19 AM 8/9/03 -0500, Craig Parmerlee wrote:
Frankly I can't imagine why anybody who
intended to abide by the license would be complaining about this.
It's for the same reason somebody might object to being searched while
having nothing to hide, or to seat belt laws while always wearing one,
A co-worker insists that a deejay is a musician. I say that is a
load, that at most he is perhaps an editer or producer.
Can a legitimate case be made in his defense?
Absolutelyl not! He does not create or recreate music, he uses other
people's music. And for the anal, the true test is
-Original Message-
From: d. collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Clickbook works much better than Fineprint, in my opinion (and I've used
both).
Clikbook (which is the software I was thinking about when I started this post) does
not work in OSX, according to the website. I never
Relative to the issue of re-registration, David wrote, in part
I read with interest Tyler's Q/A post, where Finale2004 will have a
maintenance release that will include the ability for us to transport
the registration code to a different machine -- that is EXACTLY the
garbage that Sibelius
At 10:38 AM 8/8/2003 -0400, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
Within days, if not hours, of the new version being out, there will be
cracks available.
Don't be so sure. There were multiple cracks for every version of software
I produced. I had a very primitive protection system that was easy to
On 09.08.2003 2:06 Uhr, Noel Stoutenburg wrote
In discussing a side issue with a friend about MAC OS-X, the point was
made that MAC OS-X is a variant of UNIX. This leads me to wonder, given
that 2k4 is being reconfigured to run native on Unix, er, OS-X, whether
we might, in the near (i.e.,
A co-worker insists that a deejay is a musician. I say that is a load, that
at most he is perhaps an editer or producer.
Can a legitimate case be made in his defense?
Crystal Premo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
MSN 8 with
This action depended on Gadget Labs' essential integrity. I think
Makemusic damaged that integrity by their dissembling description
of 'no copy protection' on the website. That means I don't trust
them to do what Gadget Labs did.
Just because the *marketing* guys found euphemisms for
On Monday, August 11, 2003, at 01:21 PM, Robert Patterson Finale wrote:
If I didn't already have a copy of the Thesaurus, I would be happy to
pay the asking price of $100, ridiculous though it is. I have found
the Thesaurus to be one of the most useful books on my shelf. For
those who haven't
Yes, I was thinking mainly of wind parts. I've seen so many horrendous
combined parts that I cringe when I see them. I understand that a string
section is managed differently, and when there are divisi parts in cello,
e.g., that is almost always vertical i.e. same rhythms, harmonized
notes.
In discussing a side issue with a friend about MAC OS-X, the point was
made that MAC OS-X is a variant of UNIX. This leads me to wonder, given
that 2k4 is being reconfigured to run native on Unix, er, OS-X, whether
we might, in the near (i.e., not too many upgrades in the future) see a
LINUX
1 - 100 of 223 matches
Mail list logo
