> On Sun, Jan 22, 2017 at 05:03:36AM +, Ian Munsie wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:35 AM Roger <[1]rogerx@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Back in 2006 someone made a port of Gqview to windows. It died pretty
> quickly.
> >Was this because:
> >
> ...
> >c) Windows users
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 11:35 AM Roger wrote:
> >Back in 2006 someone made a port of Gqview to windows. It died pretty
> quickly.
> >Was this because:
> >
> ...
> >c) Windows users are happy with what they have, and would not bother
> >with Geeqie
>
> My bets are on option "c) Windows users are h
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 3:26 AM, Ian Zimmerman wrote:
> While I also much prefer Geeqie to stay just a viewer, plus maybe a kind
> of "shell" for editors [1], I disagree that Linux lacks lightweight
> viewers. feh is currently my other favorite.
>
> [1]
> On this topic, would it be interesting to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hi,
Am Do den 29. Dez 2016 um 3:10 schrieb Josef Kufner:
> Ian Zimmerman wrote, on 29.12.2016 02:26:
> > On this topic, would it be interesting to create pipelines for editors,
> > rather than just invoking them 1 by 1? For example, we could make
On Thu, Dec 29, 2016 at 4:10 AM, Josef Kufner wrote:
> ...
> I think there is a better way, but it would be a bit more complicated
> to implement. I wonder if it is a bit too complex for a simple
> use-cases. It is called "block programming". It is quite an old idea:
> ...
> https://josef.kufner.
Ian Zimmerman wrote, on 29.12.2016 02:26:
> On this topic, would it be interesting to create pipelines for editors,
> rather than just invoking them 1 by 1? For example, we could make it
> possible to create a pipeline where an intricate batch imagemagick
> command is called on the current image,
On 2016-12-28 19:35, Roger wrote:
> Linux is a different story, as most easy image viewers are heavy on
> system resources or (more currently) depend upon clunky and heavy
> resource usage Python scripting. For those of us that are a little
> more computer literate, ImageMagick display does just
>Back in 2006 someone made a port of Gqview to windows. It died pretty quickly.
>Was this because:
>
>a) GTK's cross platform capability is a bit of a fiction
>
>b) Gqview/Geeqie was too complex to port successfully
>
>c) Windows users are happy with what they have, and would not bother
>with Gee
On 24/12/16 15:39, Alexander Antimonov wrote:
> While porting to C++1x it is good chance to make Geeqie more
> cross-platform. But it seems Gtk is becoming (has become) an auxiliary
> tool for the "GnomeOS". And some of the well-known projects was/is
> migrating from Gtk. Maybe we should consider Q