Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
(snip)
With wikipedia, everybody can go and edit what they want, when they want,
where they want.
Agreed. But that's also a good thing about it. Anybody can *correct*
what they want, when they want, where they want. Why do you think people
will always try to be
On Sunday April 30 2006 16:50, David Morgan wrote:
On 02:04 Mon 01 May , Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Jeff Rollin wrote:
I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG.
And it improves the speed of KDE applications too
Read your earlier post.. Anyway where is this
On 5/3/06, The Slash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interesting... I'm still a little bit paranoid about adding this to make.conf,
though. Can anybody think of a reason why I wouldn't want to add it?
Um, yes, as I have said twice in this thread
alreadyG_DISABLE_DEBUG DOESNT DO ANYTHING
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:50 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 08:47 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is (AFAIK) just a layer below TCP/IP.
Wrong. Besides: just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:57 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 05:59 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
Try a blank Firefox profile. To create one, run firefox
-ProfileManager.
This is something like the third
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:03 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 07:55 am, Justin Patrin wrote:
On 4/30/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
(I hate HTML mailand I hate Outlook even more.)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:14 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:21 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we
used today.
To find out, I
Hi,
On Fri, 05 May 2006 08:22:29 +0200 Alexander Skwar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:03 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outlook and Outlook Express are the two worst mail clients in the
universe.
They are not. Lotus
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:18, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
no, just no. This breaks enough stuff. Do not tell others to use it. If you
want to use it. Fine. But do not tell anybody else to do it.
According to
On Friday 05 May 2006 12:42, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:18, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
no, just no. This breaks enough stuff. Do not tell others to use it. If
you want to use it. Fine. But do not
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 05 May 2006 12:42, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:18, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
no, just no. This breaks enough stuff. Do not tell others to use it.
On Friday 05 May 2006 13:17, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
MAKEOPTS=
MAKEOPTS=-j2
-j1 is a good one for singlecore/single cpu computer, where the
compiling is running in the background.
No for singlecore/single cpu computer, -j2 is recommended.. Read
MAKEOPTS
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
(snip)
The difference is: with -j2 box is slow. A lot of packages do not compile
because of ooms.
with -j1 box is normal. No ooms. Compiling does not take longer as with -j2.
This is the first time I'm hearing this.. Even with -j2 my system
functions
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:19, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:03 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Outlook and Outlook Express are the two worst mail clients in the
universe.
[SNIP]
They're too slow
Not really.
You must not have used them.
Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
(snip)
The difference is: with -j2 box is slow. A lot of packages do not compile
because of ooms.
with -j1 box is normal. No ooms. Compiling does not take longer as with -j2.
This is the first time I'm hearing this.. Even with -j2 my
On Friday 05 May 2006 16:06, Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, 5 May 2006 18:49:29 +0530 Farhan Ahmed
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The difference is: with -j2 box is slow. A lot of packages do not
compile because of ooms.
with -j1 box is normal. No ooms. Compiling does not take
On Friday 05 May 2006 16:20, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
(snip)
The difference is: with -j2 box is slow. A lot of packages do not
compile because of ooms.
with -j1 box is normal. No ooms. Compiling does not take longer as with
-j2.
On Friday 05 May 2006 15:19, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
(snip)
The difference is: with -j2 box is slow. A lot of packages do not compile
because of ooms.
with -j1 box is normal. No ooms. Compiling does not take longer as with
-j2.
This is the first time I'm
This is an example:
[ 1151.984763] oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x80d2, order=0
[ 1151.984767] Mem-info:
[ 1151.984770] DMA per-cpu:
[ 1151.984772] cpu 0 hot: low 2, high 6, batch 1 used:3
[ 1151.984775] cpu 0 cold: low 0, high 2, batch 1 used:1
[ 1151.984776] Normal per-cpu:
[ 1151.984779] cpu 0 hot:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 05 May 2006 15:19, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
(snip)
PS: Your quote in previous message about gentoo-wiki is not true..
Although I agree that the Flags I quoted were unstable, you cannot say
gentoo-wiki cannot be trusted just because it can be edited by
On Friday 05 May 2006 17:35, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 05 May 2006 15:19, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
(snip)
PS: Your quote in previous message about gentoo-wiki is not true..
Although I agree that the Flags I quoted were unstable, you cannot say
Hans-Werner Hilse wrote:
I've yet to see a gcc process that claims 100MB of
physical memory.
Well, I haven't looked at memory usage, but when Qt or kdelibs
is being compiled, the system gets quite slow and especially
during linking quite some memory is used.
Alexander Skwar
--
We are what
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 05 May 2006 16:20, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
This is the first time I'm hearing this.. Even with -j2 my system
functions normally.. Has anyone encountered same problem?
Not me. I'm using -j2 on a single
On Friday 05 May 2006 19:49, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Friday 05 May 2006 16:20, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
This is the first time I'm hearing this.. Even with -j2 my system
functions normally.. Has anyone
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
(snip)
There are cases, where misonformation was not found for month, even longer -
and there are a lot of very demanding and obscure articles, would you really
bet, that every case of voluntary misinformation can and will be found?
In that case you should
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 09:35:44PM -0700, Ryan Tandy wrote
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:27 pm, Walter Dnes wrote:
Gentoo ~x86 (or ~whatever) is roughly equivalant to a mix of Debian
Testing and Unstable. A package may be ~ simply because it hasn't
been tested
On Friday 05 May 2006 19:58, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
(snip)
There are cases, where misonformation was not found for month, even
longer - and there are a lot of very demanding and obscure articles,
would you really bet, that every case of voluntary misinformation
On Friday 05 May 2006 13:55, Walter Dnes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?':
2) You will *NOT* get bug-support here or in bugzilla.gentoo.org for
packages marked as ~arch
That is absolutely untrue. I run ~amd64 and I've never had trouble getting
On Friday 05 May 2006 17:36, Maurice E Johnson wrote:
OMG
Will this thread ever stop?
It's been high jacked 5 times.
Will the guy that asked the original question please
either grow a brain or use the one he has. So rest of us don't have to
create filters for this list?
What does
On Wednesday 03 May 2006 23:02, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
about 'Re: [gentoo-user] why firefox is so slow?':
I've asked on multiple occassions for a comparison to a Debian paradigm.
My first distro was Debian. So a comparison to Debian would do me a
world of good.
ARCH ~= STABLE
but more
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:51 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:18, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
no, just no. This breaks enough stuff. Do not tell others to use it. If
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:02:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
And I recommend that you do *not* set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 unless you
are prepared for the consequences.
WHAT CONSEQUENCES!?
I've asked on multiple occassions for a comparison to a Debian
paradigm. My first distro was
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:50 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 08:47 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
that is (AFAIK) just a layer below TCP/IP.
Wrong. Besides: just a layer below TCP/IP
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:03 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 07:55 am, Justin Patrin wrote:
On 4/30/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
(I hate HTML mailand I hate Outlook even more.)
Outlook and Outlook
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 06:05 am, Tero Grundström wrote:
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, wu chuanwen wrote:
Hi! Everybody!
I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In
my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck
and even can not scroll up and
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:14 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:21 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we
used today.
To find out, I asked OP to create a
On Monday 01 May 2006 10:57 pm, Alexander Skwar wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 05:59 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
Not really.
You most likely either have a faster machine
Celeron M Notebook with 1.5 GHz. Not what I'd call fast :) And
768M
On Thursday 04 May 2006 04:42 am, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:57, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 11:51 pm, Hemmann, Volker Armin wrote:
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:18, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
snip
How did you switch to a binary version? How did you do that? I didn't
know
you could use emerge and not compile it. Unless, of course, you aren't
using
emerge...
emerge mozilla-firefox-bin will emerge the binary version of firefox
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:27 pm, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 09:02:45PM -0700, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote
And I recommend that you do *not* set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 unless you
are prepared for the consequences.
WHAT CONSEQUENCES!?
I've asked on multiple occassions for
On Wed, May 03, 2006 at 10:21:25PM -0700, Penguin Lover [EMAIL PROTECTED]
squawked:
Well, I recently switched to the binary version and to my surprise I
found that it is much faster than the self compiled version. Especially
the interface is much more responsive in the binary version. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:27 pm, Walter Dnes wrote:
Gentoo ~x86 (or ~whatever) is roughly equivalant to a mix of Debian
Testing and Unstable. A package may be ~ simply because it hasn't
been tested enough yet to certify as stable. Or it may be horribly
broken.
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 09:34 am, Richard Fish wrote:
On 5/1/06, Farhan Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you wish to have latest packages, change ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86, it
might make your system a bit unstable but going through my experience it
has not broken a thing in my system.
And I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 08:47 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when
you run
emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox
Graham Murray wrote:
Nich Steicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, this is simply wrong - IPV6 is the next generation protocol we are
currently using IPV4 - why IPV6 is a default build flag i would have
no idea, as from what i can see, it will be a good while before IPV6
actually becomes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 05:59 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
Not really.
You most likely either have a faster machine
Celeron M Notebook with 1.5 GHz. Not what I'd call fast :) And
768M ram.
or have already tweaked yours.
No.
Try a blank
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 01:11 pm, Jeff Rollin wrote:
I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it
improves the speed of KDE applications too
So, can you please tell me how to do this?
Please read the manual. It explains how to set
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 01 May 2006 07:55 am, Justin Patrin wrote:
On 4/30/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
PS: I begin to hate Googlemail because of the default to use HTML
even if it is not required. Sucks. Big time.
It may default to HTML
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:21 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we
used today.
To find out, I asked OP to create a blank profile. I also assume
a local problem at his side. OP
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
So I went through all those different USE flags, and added ones I knew I
could
add without anything blowing up. This is what I get:
# These settings were set by the catalyst build script that automatically
built this stage
# Please consult
On Tuesday 02 May 2006 08:18, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
CXXFLAGS=${CFLAGS} -fvisibility-inlines-hidden
no, just no. This breaks enough stuff. Do not tell others to use it. If you
want to use it. Fine. But do not tell anybody else to do it.
MAKEOPTS=
MAKEOPTS=-j2
-j1 is a good
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, wu chuanwen wrote:
Hi! Everybody!
I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my
machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and
even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situation.Do you
think so? And how
On 5/1/06, Farhan Ahmed [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you wish to have latest packages, change ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86, it
might make your system a bit unstable but going through my experience it
has not broken a thing in my system.
And I recommend that you do *not* set ACCEPT_KEYWORDS=~x86 unless
On 5/1/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 01:11 pm, Jeff Rollin wrote:
I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it
improves the speed of KDE applications too
So, can you please tell me how to do this?
On 4/30/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
PS: I begin to hate Googlemail because of the default to use HTML
even if it is not required. Sucks. Big time.
It may default to HTML now, as do Yahoo and Hotmail, but it's an
easy thing to turn off. I'm still using
On Sunday 30 April 2006 01:11 pm, Jeff Rollin wrote:
I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it
improves the speed of KDE applications too
So, can you please tell me how to do this? I'd really appreciate it.
On Sunday 30 April 2006 05:59 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
Hi! Everybody!
I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?
Yes.
Not really.
You most likely either have a faster machine or have already tweaked yours.
In
my machine,if i open 6 or
On Sunday 30 April 2006 11:21 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we
used today.
To find out, I asked OP to create a blank profile. I also assume
a local problem at his side. OP should simply create a new
On Sunday 30 April 2006 08:47 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when
you run
emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox
I get this:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 07:22 am, Jeff Rollin wrote:
Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo
till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUG
So, this is going to be a very elementary question, but it's honestly because
I don't know.
I have major problems with Firefox
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 [1.0.7-r4] -debug +gnome
+ipv6 +java* -mozcalendar -mozdevelop -moznoxft -mozsvg +truetype -xinerama
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 08:47 am, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when
you run
emerge -vpt
On Monday 01 May 2006 07:55 am, Justin Patrin wrote:
On 4/30/06, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
PS: I begin to hate Googlemail because of the default to use HTML
even if it is not required. Sucks. Big time.
It may default to HTML now, as do Yahoo and
On Monday 01 May 2006 04:32 pm, Farhan Ahmed wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(snip)
These are the packages that I would merge, in reverse order:
Calculating dependencies ...done!
[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.0.8 [1.0.7-r4] -debug
+gnome
+ipv6 +java*
Nich Steicke [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No, this is simply wrong - IPV6 is the next generation protocol we are
currently using IPV4 - why IPV6 is a default build flag i would have
no idea, as from what i can see, it will be a good while before IPV6
actually becomes implemented.
IPv6 is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 30 April 2006 07:22 am, Jeff Rollin wrote:
Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo
till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUG
So, this is going to be a very elementary question, but it's honestly because
I don't know.
I have
Hi! Everybody!I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same
situation.Do you think so? And how can you solve this problem?-- wcw
Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags?On 30/04/06, wu chuanwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi! Everybody!I think most of us are
using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6
or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not
scroll up and down.Many peple
wu chuanwen wrote:
Hi! Everybody!
I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?
Not really.
In
my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck
and even can not scroll up and down.
Works fine here.
Many peple have the same
situation.
2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags?USE=gtk gnome gcj hal -qt -kde dvd alsa cdr nptl nptlonly pic.It's OK!Oh god! Just like now ,i just open two tab,it's so slow when i switch between the two tab.
On 30/04/06, wu chuanwen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote:
Hi! Everybody!
I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?
Not really.
In
my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck
and even can not scroll up
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
wu chuanwen wrote: Hi! Everybody! I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?Not really. In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck
and even can not scroll up and down.Works fine here. Many
2006/4/30, wu chuanwen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
wu chuanwen wrote: Hi! Everybody! I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?Not really. In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck
and even can not
2006/4/30, Andrea Barisani [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 02:59:06PM +0200, Alexander Skwar wrote: wu chuanwen wrote: Hi! Everybody! I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow? Not really.
In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be
On Sunday, April 30 2006 22:52, wu chuanwen wrote:
I am sorry,i forget the link:
http://www.linuxsir.org/bbs/showthread.php?t=252747
I don't think it'd be much help posting a Chinese forum thread in an English
mailing list.
--
Raymond Lewis Rebbeck
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
2006/4/30, Raymond Lewis Rebbeck [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Sunday, April 30 2006 22:52, wu chuanwen wrote: I am sorry,i forget the link: http://www.linuxsir.org/bbs/showthread.php?t=252747
I don't think it'd be much help posting a Chinese forum thread in an Englishmailing list.I just mean to show that
wu chuanwen wrote:
Can you tell me which version you are using ?
mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2
PS: Please only send HTML mails, if it is really necessary.
Alexander Skwar
--
There is only one word for aid that is genuinely without strings,
and that word is blackmail.
--
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags?
USE=gtk gnome gcj hal -qt -kde dvd alsa cdr nptl nptlonly pic.
Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when
you run
emerge -vpt
I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox 1.5.0.2On 30/04/06,
Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Works fine on mine; what are your
Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of Gentoo till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUGOn 30/04/06, Jeff Rollin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox
1.5.0.2
On 30/04/06,
Jeff Rollin wrote:
Oh, yeah. I couldn't understand why people raved about the speed of
Gentoo till I added USE=-DG_DISABLE_DEBUG
What's that supposed to do? It doesn't seem to be a valid USE flag.
Alexander Skwar
PS: Top posts are no good.
--
Brian Griffin: Seriously, who buys a novelty
Jeff Rollin wrote:
I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any
trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox 1.5.0.2
If -O3 REALLY gives a speedup depends heavily on your CPU. You
might not get a speedup at all - and, more likely, you might
not get a *noticeable*
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
wu chuanwen wrote: 2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Works fine on mine; what are your USE flags? USE=gtk gnome gcj hal -qt -kde dvd alsa cdr nptl nptlonly pic.Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when
2006/4/30, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in firefox
1.5.0.2I can't use O3 because i got many errors when complied my gentoo .I use O2,-- wcw
Alexander,
DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them smaller (and faster)
Jeff. On 30/04/06, Alexander Skwar
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeff Rollin wrote: I know a lot of people don't recommend this, but I haven't had any trouble with CFLAGS=-O3, specifically in
060430 wu chuanwen wrote:
I think most of us are using firefox now. Do you think it's too slow?
if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,
my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and down.
I have this problem with Independent (newspaper), but not generally.
I suspect it's caused by heavy
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when
you run
emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox
I get this:
[ebuild U ] www-client/mozilla-firefox-1.5.0.2 [1.5.0.1-r4]
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Alexander Skwar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hm, those are not firefox USE flags. What do you get, when
you run
emerge -vpt mozilla-firefox
I get this:
[ebuild U ]
On 4/30/06, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander,
DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them
smaller (and faster)
Maybe as a CFLAG, but not a USE flag. And it will only affect
gnome/glib/gtk applications.
PS: As Alexander already said, please do not
Am Sonntag 30 April 2006 14:24 schrieb wu chuanwen:
I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my
machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and
even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have the same situation.Do you
think so? And how
wu chuanwen wrote:
Oh! I know now.I use gmail(i think it is the best e-mail now which can
sort you e-mail by topic and looks very good!)and never see my mail
from the mail-list in other application.
Is this mail OK now ?
Yes, that's *VERY* *MUCH* better now. Thanks a lot!
Alexander Skwar
--
2006/4/30, Heiko Wundram [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Sonntag 30 April 2006 14:24 schrieb wu chuanwen:
I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my
machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and
even can not scroll up and down.Many peple have
On 4/30/06, Heiko Wundram [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Am Sonntag 30 April 2006 14:24 schrieb wu chuanwen: I think most of us are using firefox now .Do you think it's too slow?In my machine,if i open 6 or more tabs in firefox,my firefox will be stuck and even can not scroll up and
down.Many peple
2006/4/30, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 4/30/06, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander,
DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them
smaller (and faster)
Maybe as a CFLAG, but not a USE flag. And it will only affect
gnome/glib/gtk applications.
wu chuanwen wrote:
2006/4/30, Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On 4/30/06, Jeff Rollin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alexander,
DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them
smaller (and faster)
Maybe as a CFLAG, but not a USE flag. And it will only affect
Kesara Rathnayake wrote:
I guess Firefox is slow now because of whole lot of Extentions that we
used today.
To find out, I asked OP to create a blank profile. I also assume
a local problem at his side. OP should simply create a new profile
and report back.
Alexander Skwar
PS: I begin to
Jeff Rollin wrote:
DG_DISABLE_DEBUG strips debugging information from binaries, making them
smaller (and faster)
I dont think there is any use flags like DG_DISABLE_DEBUG.. As for as
debugging symbols goes the use flag 'debug' control them i guess.. And
as far as i know on x86 arch it
Alexander Skwar wrote:
(snip)_
To the others: Is ipv6 still one of the default flags? Has
this bug still not been fixed?
(snip)
Well in default-linux/{alpha,amd64,arm,hppa,ia64,m68k,s390,sh,x86}
profiles, its on by default.. I don know for sure that in hardened profile
it's turned off..
Alexander Skwar wrote:
(snip)
PS: I begin to hate Googlemail because of the default to use HTML
even if it is not required. Sucks. Big time.
Another thing that sucks, is that HTML mails are permitted on this
list. Why not just dump the HTML part (and every other attachment)?
Well I think
I didn't say DG_DISABLE_DEBUG was a USE flag, I said it was a CFLAG. And it improves the speed of KDE applications too-- --Argument against Linux number 6,033:
...So
this is like most Linux viruses. You have to download the virus
yourself, become
1 - 100 of 112 matches
Mail list logo
