On 29/03/13 16:21, Raffaele BELARDI wrote:
By the way, I found this:
$ cat /usr/portage/profiles/desc/abi_x86.desc
[...]
32 - 32-bit (x86) libraries
64 - 64-bit (amd64) libraries
x32 - x32 ABI libraries
...and searching for USE_EXPAND in
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general-concepts/use-flags/
On Friday 29 Mar 2013 23:40:18 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote:
Am 29.03.2013 22:40, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
Am 29.03.2013 22:03, schrieb Stefan G. Weichinger:
I don't know about NM's preferences ... I just assume this could be
the problem.
Gotta dig up some udev-ruling for this, any
Am 30.03.2013 08:54, schrieb Mick:
Don't you lve OS automation? Especially when it works! ;-)
;-)
If you look at the device manager you will probably find different
strings describing the USB device interfaces that WinXP
detects/assigns compared to your Linux OS + udevd + systemd.
Another interesting point about this load control thing is that if the
package uses a build system which doesn't support load control, load will
surge high.
It is currently happening with me while installing Mongo, because the build
system scons doesn't have load control feature.
On Mar 29, 2013
my udev-rule:
# cat /etc/udev/rules.d/10-network.rules
SUBSYSTEM==net, ACTION==add, ATTR{address}==0c:5b:8f:27:9a:64,
NAME=wwan0
What I get:
# lsusb
Bus 001 Device 043: ID 12d1:1506 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. E398
LTE/UMTS/GSM Modem/Networkcard
# lsmod
Module Size Used
next steps:
Pulled HUAWEI Data Cards Linux Driver from
http://www.huaweidevice.com/worldwide/downloadCenter.do?method=toDownloadFileflay=softwaresoftid=NDcwMzU=
With this I was able to enter the PIN and get mobile broadband in NM
... although still no connection.
The install-process of this
130330 Walter Dnes wrote:
I have 2 Dell desktops (production and hot backup)
that are pushing 5 or 6 years of age, and I need to replace at least one.
They simply can't keep up with HD video streams...
* I'm running Gentoo with full optimizations
* I'm running ICEWM with no desktop
Am 29.03.2013 um 23:34 schrieb Paul Hartman paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Thursday 28 March 2013 20:53:49 Paul Hartman wrote:
In my case, my ISP's DNS servers are slow (several seconds to reply),
fail
On 2013-03-28 2:15 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Just a thought. Have you thought about switching to eudev? That would
solve some udev issues. Since you are running a hardened profile and
servers, may not be a option tho.
I'm curious...
Is eudev still being 'maintained'? Does it
I should have added that this is for a server (not hardened), so I don't
care about hot plug this or that, I just care about stability and
reliability with respect to updates not breaking booting capability...
On 2013-03-30 10:39 AM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
On 2013-03-28
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:06:16 +0100
Norman Rieß nor...@smash-net.org wrote:
Am 29.03.2013 um 23:34 schrieb Paul Hartman
paul.hartman+gen...@gmail.com:
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 7:49 PM, Peter Humphrey
pe...@humphrey.ukfsn.org wrote:
On Thursday 28 March 2013 20:53:49 Paul Hartman wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:06:16 +0100
Norman Rieß nor...@smash-net.org wrote:
As we all know everything works better and cheaper when things are
privatized
Actually No it's not so simple at all.
You get incompetence in private and public and you may be more likely
to get away with it for longer
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:53:29 +0100
Rene Rasmussen gen...@paranoidix.dk wrote:
There is also the possibility to use opendns.com
I've been using them for years, and have not had any trouble. I
started using them when my ISP decided to block some sites. And their
standard service is free :)
Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page, and
the only thing left that I'm unsure/concerned about now is the
persistent net rules changes...
The very last line on the wiki page says:
4. Known problems
Stale 70-persistent-net.rules (or other network rules) in
Ok, I don't understand this...
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention of
udev-200, but...
when I uncomment them:
=sys-fs/udev-181
=virtual/udev-181
emerge
On 2013-03-30 11:15 AM, Kevin Chadwick ma1l1i...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 15:53:29 +0100
Rene Rasmussen gen...@paranoidix.dk wrote:
There is also the possibility to use opendns.com
I've been using them for years, and have not had any trouble. I
started using them when my ISP
On 2013-03-30, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
Ok, just read the new news item and the linked udev-guide wiki page, and
the only thing left that I'm unsure/concerned about now is the
persistent net rules changes...
The very last line on the wiki page says:
4. Known problems
Tanstaafl wrote:
I should have added that this is for a server (not hardened), so I
don't care about hot plug this or that, I just care about stability
and reliability with respect to updates not breaking booting
capability...
As far as I know, it is actively maintained. Do I see the
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:24:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention of
udev-200, but...
Because you're running stable? Versions
Am 30.03.2013 16:11, schrieb Kevin Chadwick:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:06:16 +0100
Norman Rieß nor...@smash-net.org wrote:
As we all know everything works better and cheaper when things are
privatized
Actually No it's not so simple at all.
You get incompetence in private and public and
On 2013-03-30 12:42 PM, Neil Bothwick n...@digimed.co.uk wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 11:24:49 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention of
Hi,
after quite some time I have tried to use jedit again.
To my surprise, I cannot input any key (the mouse is working though).
I've tried a trivial Keyboard read test written in Java which works
just fine.
What's going on here?
Many thanks for a hint,
Helmut.
On 03/30/2013 11:24 PM, Tanstaafl
wrote:
Ok,
I don't understand this...
Why is it that when I comment out the package.mask entries for
udev:
#=sys-fs/udev-181
#=virtual/udev-181
emerge
On Saturday 30 Mar 2013 15:11:17 Kevin Chadwick wrote:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 13:06:16 +0100
Norman Rieß nor...@smash-net.org wrote:
As we all know everything works better and cheaper when things are
privatized
Actually No it's not so simple at all.
You get incompetence in private
On 30 March 2013, at 04:20, Walter Dnes wrote:
...
* it could keep up with Youtube 480p videos fullscreen under ADSL 5
megabit service. The stream was the limit.
* after the speed was bumped up, it could keep up with Youtube 720p
videos fullscreen under ADSL 6 megabit service. The stream
On Mar 30, 2013 9:48 PM, Tanstaafl tansta...@libertytrek.org wrote:
I should have added that this is for a server (not hardened), so I don't
care about hot plug this or that, I just care about stability and
reliability with respect to updates not breaking booting capability...
On 2013-03-30
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 12:49:52 -0400, Tanstaafl wrote:
emerge -pvuND world shows updates to udev-197, with no mention of
udev-200, but...
Because you're running stable? Versions higher than 197-r8 are still
in testing.
Right... hence my question... why if I comment out those lines
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 18:46:43 +, Neil Bothwick wrote:
Because you're running stable? Versions higher than 197-r8 are still
in testing.
Right... hence my question... why if I comment out those lines do I
now see all of these other weird updates for udev-200?
--tree should
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 05:39:15PM +, Stroller wrote
Decide whether or not you need a new PC and make a new post -
UEFI/secureboot is irrelevant to poor YouTube performance.
I may not have been as clear as I wanted to be. With the increase in
my download speed, the bottleneck to
On 31/03/2013 00:20, Walter Dnes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 05:39:15PM +, Stroller wrote
Decide whether or not you need a new PC and make a new post -
UEFI/secureboot is irrelevant to poor YouTube performance.
I may not have been as clear as I wanted to be. With the increase in
Did an update today. After the update, I checked again...
[d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv --update --changed-use world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
Total: 0 packages, Size of downloads: 0 kB
Good... nothing to add... I think.
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
Did an update today. After the update, I checked again...
[d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv --update --changed-use world
These are the packages that would be merged, in order:
Calculating dependencies... done!
On Thu, Mar 28, 2013 at 3:51 AM, Norman Rieß nor...@smash-net.org wrote:
Hello,
i am using pdns recursor to provide a dns server which should be usable
for everybody.The problem is, that the server seems to be used in dns
amplification attacks.
I googled around on how to prevent this but did
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 10:04:24PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote
On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 9:49 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote:
Did an update today. After the update, I checked again...
[d531][waltdnes][~] emerge -pv --update --changed-use world
These are the packages that
Sorry if I was terse in my previous reply.
On 30 March 2013, at 22:20, Walter Dnes wrote:
...
As per the subject line, I'm asking if current Dells have any
showstoppers for Gentoo. If not, I'll probably go with a Dell.
I would think Dell would probably be a very good choice.
I know that
35 matches
Mail list logo
