What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling
directly with userpriv?
On Thursday 06 November 2008, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello,
Recent versions of portage have suggested an emerge -e world, so I thought
I'd try it. It got as far as sandbox, which failed with the once-common C
compiler cannot create executables error. Of course I
tried FEATURES=-sandbox emerge
Selon Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com:
I would try it with sandbox disabled.
FEATURES=-*sandbox* your emerge command here
It may work. Certainly worth a shot I guess.
Bingo! For some reason, FEATURES=-*sandbox* emerge nss did'nt work (sandbox
still used) when replacing FEATURE=...usersandbox
Same result with the version of sandbox you make use of it!
Tamer
Am 19.06.2013 10:13, schrieb Helmut Jarausch:
That's strange, since I've just re-emerged the same version of PyCrypto
here.
One difference might be the version of sys-apps/sandbox
On my unstable Portage system I'm using
On Friday 18 January 2008, Michael Schmarck wrote:
Helmut Jarausch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I have sys-apps/sandbox-1.2.20_alpha2-r1 installed but still
when I install a kernel module I need to disable the sandbox by using
FEATURES='-sandbox'
I am running kernel 2.6.23-gentoo-r3
---
LOG FILE =
/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log
access_wr: /
-
-- -
What does this mean?
Thanks,
István
as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app tried
:
Source compiled.
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE =
/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log
access_wr
On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling
directly with userpriv?
*advantage
Hi,
I have sys-apps/sandbox-1.2.20_alpha2-r1 installed but still
when I install a kernel module I need to disable the sandbox by using
FEATURES='-sandbox'
I am running kernel 2.6.23-gentoo-r3 and gcc-4.2.2 as standard
C-compiler.
Am I missing something or is the bug not fixed, yet?
Many
Ian K wrote:
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE =
/tmp/sandbox-media-video_-_f4l-0.2-25033.log
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
Thank you. Disabling ccache fixed it.
Trying to install (emerge)
app-emulation/virtualbox-modules
under the new 2.6.23 kernel dies with a sandbox violation
open_wr: /usr/src/linux-2.6.23-gentoo/null.gcda
using
FEATURES='-sandbox' emerge app-emulation/virtualbox-modules
helps.
--
Helmut Jarausch
Lehrstuhl fuer Numerische
Rumen Yotov a écrit :
Hi,
Try disabling the sandbox FEATURE in /etc/make.conf.
Run: 'FEATURE=-sandbox emerge www-client/opera -a'
Never used 'opera' so can't say more.
HTH.Rumen
Hi,
Disabling sandbox is probably a bad idea.
Bug #134368
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
Nilesh Govindrajan wrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan cont...@nileshgr.com
mailto:cont...@nileshgr.com wrote:
What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling
directly with userpriv?
*advantage
I found this:
http://devmanual.gentoo.org/general
> Unable to unshare: EINVAL (for FEATURES="ipc-sandbox network-sandbox
> pid-sandbox")
Is the CONFIG_UTS_NS kernel option enabled?
See the following forums threads for details:
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-260.html
https://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-1094424
alain.didierj...@free.fr wrote:
Selon Dalerdalek1...@gmail.com:
I would try it with sandbox disabled.
FEATURES=-*sandbox*your emerge command here
It may work. Certainly worth a shot I guess.
Bingo! For some reason, FEATURES=-*sandbox* emerge nss did'nt work (sandbox
still used
Hello
On Wed, Aug 29, 2007 at 07:11:14PM +, Noud Aldenhoven wrote:
Could someone tell my how I can give my ebuild the rights to access
/usr/bin? The script looks like this one:
The direct solution would be RESTRICT=sandbox (or somehow like this,
not sure if it is the exact wording
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:54 +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
These sandbox violations happen all too frequently. You should
raise a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org. For the time being,
however, just do:
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge evolution
My make.global file contains sandbox
On Fri, 29 Jul 2005 18:29:10 +0200, Tomas Linhart wrote:
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
--- LOG FILE =
/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-gnome-base_-_gdm-2.8.0.1-1869.log
open_wr: /etc/pam.d/gdm
open_wr: /etc/pam.d/gdm-autologin
On Fri, Aug 19, 2005 at 02:57:05PM -0400, Nick Smith wrote:
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error: C
compiler cannot create executables
I remember seeing this recently from sandbox:
If configure fails with a 'cannot run C compiled programs' error, try
y read the error message, these errors are
coming from setuptools, not from the Gentoo sandbox.
The last time that caused a problem, it was because of a missing
dependency. If your kernel supports it, you can set
FEATURES="network-sandbox" to catch those earlier.
Hello,
I am successfully updating a remote system using ssh and screen, but for some
packages (e.g. rust, thunderbird, firefox) during the pre-merge checks I get
this message:
Unable to unshare: EINVAL (for FEATURES="ipc-sandbox network-sandbox
pid-sandbox")
FEATURES in my make.con
On Friday 09 November 2007 21:55:20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ ok ] ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd
...
ACCESS DENIED open_wr: /etc/passwd
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
--- LOG FILE =
/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-dev-libs_
--- Jules Colding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:54 +0100, Peter Ruskin
wrote:
These sandbox violations happen all too
frequently. You should
raise a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org. For
the time being,
however, just do:
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 08:51 -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
--- Jules Colding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 14:54 +0100, Peter Ruskin
wrote:
These sandbox violations happen all too
frequently. You should
raise a bug report at http://bugs.gentoo.org. For
the time
Hi,
I'm trying to emerge mythtv but keep running into a problem with sandbox.
Whenever I try to emerge, the compiling seems to work fine, but the
installation fails and I get several 'Access Violations'. It seems that
instead of installing into '/usr/xxx', mythtv is trying to go straight
On Wednesday 08 November 2006 15:03, Stefán István wrote:
Hi!
I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is
finished:
Source compiled.
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app
On Saturday 20 August 2005 16:08, Zac Medico wrote:
Ian K wrote:
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE =
/tmp/sandbox-media-video_-_f4l-0.2-25033.log
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings
that he doesn't need sandbox.
Once for fun I build a gentoo system in VirtualBox and left sandbox out
by accident.
Where did you leave it out? Or do you mean you took it out with a
-sandbox?
Yes, I took it out with -sandbox. I was being pathetic that day and
attempted a pathetic
!!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
!!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
Start by fixing your sandbox.
[...]
[blocks B ] dev-lang/python-2.3.6-r2 (is blocking
app-admin/python-updater-0.2)
[...]
How can I resolve this blocking?
Make sure you read comment 1
On Dec 29, 2:40 am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
out of its crib.
What package you are talking about? If you did not modified anything
unusual on your system, fill in bug report on that package... Do not
forgive emerge --info
I've downgrade sandbox it works, thanks both of you.
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Zsitvai János zsitv...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin wrote:
and here it is emerge --info:
http://dpaste.com/hold/47084/
According to http://bugs.gentoo.org/267053, downgrading sandbox to version
1.7 should work
Hi!
I try to emerge pgp, and get the following error when the compilation is
finished:
Source compiled.
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log
access_wr
Makurin Roman wrote:
Hi All
I cant install neon, it gives me sandbox violation :-(
Is there any way to solve this ?
10nx
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge neon
Be warned that build scripts will have unsandboxed root privivileges. This bug
is strange. Others have experienced it:
http
I've just read that word a couple of times now - but after sanbox was
installed on my system becuause of the latest portage upgrade - i'm
really courios to know what this tool is about ...
Maybe someone can tell me more than http://gentoo-wiki.com/Sandbox ...
Antonio
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Tomas Linhart wrote:
LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-gnome-base_-_gdm-2.8.0.1-1869.log
So, why not include this file? It probably includes oodles of useful
information.
--
[Name ] :: [Matan I. Peled]
[Location ] :: [Israel]
[Public Key] :: [0xD6F42CA5
On Sat, 2010-09-11 at 05:46 -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote:
In a perfect, tidy world we'd all do that. This world, however does
not
exist. Even portage, by default does configure and make as root
(albeit
in a sandbox so it is safe(r).
I suppose one could compile the kernel sources as root
On Fri, Dec 28, 2007 at 03:58:27PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
out of its crib.
I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention.
Possibly this is something screamingly obvious and people just ignored
On 5/6/06, Marc Redmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, I'm trying to emerge mythtv but keep running into a problem with sandbox. Whenever I try to emerge, the compiling seems to work fine, but the installation fails and I get several 'Access Violations'.It seems that
instead of installinginto '/usr
SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE =
/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-crypt_-_gnupg-1.9.20-r3-26975.log
access_wr: /
---
-
What does this mean?
Thanks,
István
as it says, somewhere the ebuild/app
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 4:50 AM, Nilesh Govindrajan cont...@nileshgr.comwrote:
On Aug 13, 2012 2:19 PM, Nilesh Govindrajan cont...@nileshgr.com
wrote:
What's the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of compiling
directly with userpriv?
*advantage
If you do things like parallel
or it may be
possible only in firefox-bin builds. From that article (which is by
Mozilla's CTO, by the way),
Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
working on deterministic builds that will allow developers to use a
sandbox compiled on their own machine with the CDM
/sandbox-1.2.17/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/config.log
to any bug reports. It's not that large so I thought I'd post it here
and see if I can get any faster answers as to what's gone wrong. To me
it looks like it's gone a bit strange about choosing the C compiler at
this point, but I don't
The screen said to attach the file
/var/tmp/portage/sandbox-1.2.17/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/config.log
to any bug reports. It's not that large so I thought I'd post it here
and see if I can get any faster answers as to what's gone wrong. To me
it looks like it's gone a bit strange about choosing
I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just
installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as
expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures:
both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line.
It's some
ABCD en.a...@gmail.com writes:
Is it related to hal daemon problem?
emerge -vuD glibc
[...]
usr/lib/libc_nonshared.a
Completed installing glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2 into
/var/tmp/portage/sys-libs/glibc-2.9_p20081201-r2/image/
[snip sandbox error]
That actually is completely separate
gg wrote:
> Hallo ,
>
> please help me. I try to install a new Gentoo with no-multilib (AMD64) ,
>
> but compiling sandbox fails :
>
>
> ebuild R ] sys-apps/sandbox-2.12
>
> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>>> Verifying ebuild
On Monday 15 October 2007 12:29:42 Stefán István wrote:
Thanks for the tip, the manual update was successful.
Now I have another problem, when I try to update portage with the emerge
command:
# emerge -pv portage
!!! Problem with sandbox binary. Disabling...
!!! Problem with sandbox binary
On Friday 09 November 2007 23:11:26 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 10:36:48PM +0100, Bo ?rsted Andresen wrote:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=196720 ?
Upgrade sandbox to -r2 ?
Any idea how to actually do that, since the bug prevents me from
upgrading
+summary+sandbox.html
That should help. I hope anyway.
Thanks... using the FEATURE trick to turn off sandbox allows me to:
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge -vu rsync
But according to your second link which leads to a message dated Sat
Oct 27, 2007, this should not be necessary with newer versions
On Friday 28 December 2007 22:58:27 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
out of its crib.
I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention.
Possibly this is something screamingly obvious and people just ignored
the posts
Hello guys,
I'm trying to write an ebuild for xmms plug-in, but always get an
error during of emerging it. Here it is:
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-kde-misc_-_xmms-agent-1.1-15026.log
open_wr: /usr/qt
When I try to emerge gthumb, I get this at the end:
Completed installing gthumb-2.6.3 into
/var/tmp/portage/gthumb-2.6.3/image/
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
--- LOG FILE =
/tmp/sandbox-media-gfx_-_gthumb-2.6.3-25558.log
open_wr
On 12/6/05, Ernie Schroder [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK so it built with FEATURES=-sandbox but I guess I don't understand why.
Could someone give a brief description of the cause of sandbox violations?
Sandbox violations occur when a build of a package tries to modify
something on your
Hi guys,I'm trying to install bacula console on my amd64 notebook but I always get the same error after the build:--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY ---LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-app-backup_-_bacula-
1.36.3-r3-26793.logopen_wr: /dev/sg0open_wr
On Thu, 25 Aug 2005 14:51:33 -0400, Willie Wong wrote:
BUT!!! It seems that there is a bug with genlop and newer versions of
portage because some issues with a sandbox lockfile. Search for
genlop sandbox on bugs.gentoo.org for more info. In any case, for
the time being, until the bug is fixed
On 10/25/2010 01:24 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote:
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:36 on Monday 25 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Then again, Alan knows
Gentoo pretty well and may know that he doesn't need sandbox.
Once for fun I build a gentoo system in VirtualBox and left sandbox
> -Original Message-
> From: Francesco Turco
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2020 09:44
> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] EINVAL
>
> > Unable to unshare: EINVAL (for FEATURES="ipc-sandbox network-sandbox
> pid-sandbox")
&g
Hello,
Recent versions of portage have suggested an emerge -e world, so I thought
I'd try it. It got as far as sandbox, which failed with the once-common C
compiler cannot create executables error. Of course I
tried FEATURES=-sandbox emerge sandbox but that failed with the same
error.
I
--- LOG FILE =
/var/log/sandbox/sandbox-dev-libs_-_glib-2.14.3-11618.log
open_wr: /etc/passwd
...
open_wr: /etc/passwd
[SNIP]
emerge --info
Portage 2.1.3.19 (default-linux/amd64/2006.1, gcc-4.2.2, glibc-2.7-r0,
2.6.23-gentoo-r1 x86_64)
[SNIP]
sys
/sandbox/sandbox-kde-misc_-_xmms-agent-1.1-15026.log
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qtrc.lock
open_wr: /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.qt_plugins_3.3rc.lock
everything using install.py directly (not emerging with
portage). also, using FEATURES=-sandbox i can emerge without
problems. so this problem seems to be related to the sandbox,
something i never got to understand completely...
Have you updated python recently and did not run python-updater
It will be included in 2.6.20 kernel, as it seems. But it's not in
2.6.19.1 :-(
But it will be in 2.6.19.2 - hooray!
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Antonio Coralles wrote:
I've just read that word a couple of times now - but after sanbox was
installed on my system becuause of the latest portage upgrade - i'm
really courios to know what this tool is about ...
Maybe someone can tell me more than http://gentoo-wiki.com/Sandbox ...
Antonio
I get the error below when compiling sandbox (any version):
mv -f .deps/libsandbox_la-canonicalize.Tpo
.deps/libsandbox_la-canonicalize.Plo
make[2]: *** No rule to make target `../libsbutil/.libs/libsbutil.a',
needed by `libsandbox.la'. Stop.
make[2]: Leaving directory
`/var/tmp/portage/sys-apps
.
Does this mean for portage -2.1.9.22 you advocate
FEATURES=buildsyspkg
in make.conf?
If so is that the correct line or do we need
FEATURES=buildsyspkg sandbox
I find the man page wording a little unclear and its warning about an
error serious.
thanks
allan
This is mine.
FEATURES= buildpkg
/sandbox
On my unstable Portage system I'm using sandbox-2.6-rc1 while you have
version 2.5.
and info:
sys-apps/sandbox: 2.5
Perhaps you should file a bug report about this sandbox violation
Sorry,
Helmut.
e end I had two failures:
> both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line.
>
> It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked
> through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the
> environment with this box's, but nothing stan
On 03/26/2018 07:19 AM, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just
> installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as
> expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures:
> both glibc
e -e world at the end I had two
> failures:
> > both glibc and sandbox failed with the error in the subject line.
> >
> > It's some years since I last saw this error, and I'm stuck. I've looked
> > through /etc hoping to find something skew-whiff, and I've compared the
&
On 03/26/18 06:19, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> I have a four-core 64-bit Celeron box with 4GB RAM, on which I've just
> installed a standard XFCE system on the desktop profile. It all went as
> expected, but when I ran an emerge -e world at the end I had two failures:
> both glibc
entoo was built with the following:
> USE="-test" ABI_X86="(64)" PYTHON_TARGETS="python2_7 python3_7 (-pypy3)
> -python3_6 (-python3_8)"
> FEATURES="binpkg-logs qa-unresolved-soname-deps multilib-strict sfperms
> fixlafiles preserve-libs unmerge-orphans use
On Fri, Apr 02, 2021 at 04:58:56PM +, itsgrant wrote:
> THE ISSUE:
> I am failing to emerge sys-kernel/gentoo-kernel-5.4.105 with a sandbox
> violation. The violation summary is inserted below:
> [...]
> R: /dev/null.dwo
> C: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -Werror -gsplit-dwarf -S
= /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-sys-auth_-_bioapi-1.2.2-11953.log
Is this your problem? http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154776
--
Neil Bothwick
WinErr 01D: System crash - We are unable to figure out our own code.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-sys-auth_-_bioapi-1.2.2-11953.log
Is this your problem? http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154776
In fact thats what I get as an error, but their sollution doesn't work
for me :S
Greetz
Kabel
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED
with it.
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge sandbox
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- ACCESS VIOLATION SUMMARY
---
LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-26803.log
open_rd: /root/.bash_history
open_rd: /root/.bash_history
Hi,
has anybody a hint how to get sys-cluster/mpich2 (-1.0.8)
emerged?
I allways get ACCESS VIOLATION
I've tried
FEATURES=-sandbox
and
FEATURES=-userpriv
but nothing helps.
I'm using sys-apps/sandbox-1.3.2 which works fine
except for this package.
Is there any brute force method next
Helmut Jarausch schrieb:
Hi,
has anybody a hint how to get sys-cluster/mpich2 (-1.0.8)
emerged?
I allways get ACCESS VIOLATION
I've tried
FEATURES=-sandbox
and
FEATURES=-userpriv
but nothing helps.
I'm using sys-apps/sandbox-1.3.2 which works fine
except for this package
Thomas Kahle wrote:
Hi everyone,
recently I killed a running merge of app-emacs/auctex with C-c in the
shell. Now after that I am not able to install the package anymore. I
get a sandbox when kpathsea is run.
Just a shot in the dark, but try this as root:
rm -rf /var/tmp/portage
everything using install.py directly (not emerging with
portage). also, using FEATURES=-sandbox i can emerge without
problems. so this problem seems to be related to the sandbox,
something i never got to understand completely...
best,
lj
luis jure schrieb am 11.10.2008 14:37:
thanks for your answer, that doesn't seem to be the problem, though.
i can install everything using install.py directly (not emerging with
portage). also, using FEATURES=-sandbox i can emerge without
problems. so this problem seems to be related
/Inkscape
This violates the sandbox - see below -
What can I do about it?
Posting the ebuild you are using would be a good start..
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 13:47 +0200, Jules Colding wrote:
On Mon, 2005-06-06 at 12:38 +0100, Peter Ruskin wrote:
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge scrollkeeper
Thanks a lot, you just saved my day! Could you please tell me what
sandbox is?
RTFM: http://bugday.gentoo.org/sandbox.html
--
Jules
Hi,
i attached a patch. See comments #70 and #72 of this bug:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149307
from where i got it, and so on ...
It fixes the sandbox violations with vanilla 2.6.19 kernel.
It will be included in 2.6.20 kernel, as it seems. But it's not in
2.6.19.1 :-(
I thought
On 7/29/05, Matan Peled [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tomas Linhart wrote:
LOG FILE = /var/log/sandbox/sandbox-gnome-base_-_gdm-2.8.0.1-1869.log
So, why not include this file? It probably includes oodles of useful
information.
No, that file includes only the information that I've posted
reporting any issues.
scons release=1 || die scons failed
}
If you run equery depends -a scons and read some of those ebuilds you'll see
something like this:
scons DESTDIR=${D}
See the explanation of ${D} in the ebuild(5) manpage. That helps keep you
inside the sandbox.
Zac
--
gentoo
On 2/22/10, John H. Moe john...@optusnet.com.au wrote:
From the looks of things, it's trying to install a file directly to the
filesystem outside the /var/tmp sandbox. I believe this is a bug that
needs reporting, but before I did that, I thought I'd check to be sure
it wasn't something I
Apparently, though unproven, at 04:36 on Monday 25 October 2010, Dale did
opine thusly:
Then again, Alan knows
Gentoo pretty well and may know that he doesn't need sandbox.
Once for fun I build a gentoo system in VirtualBox and left sandbox out by
accident.
The results were ... awful. Bad
s too late already.
>
> For example, if sandboxed, untrusted code wants to speculatively execute a
> memcpy(), then the sandbox would need to call it on behalf of the untrusted
> code. But if the sandbox is protected, the memcpy() call would never be made
> speculatively, since
I'm having a continuing annoying problem from sandbox trying to write
out of its crib.
I've posted here twice before but caught no ones attention.
Possibly this is something screamingly obvious and people just ignored
the posts.
`sandbox' doesn't like my root .bash_history.
ACCESS DENIED
On 6 Nov, Peter Humphrey wrote:
Hello,
Recent versions of portage have suggested an emerge -e world, so I thought
I'd try it. It got as far as sandbox, which failed with the once-common C
compiler cannot create executables error. Of course I
tried FEATURES=-sandbox emerge sandbox
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 4:02 PM, Peter Humphrey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Recent versions of portage have suggested an emerge -e world, so I thought
I'd try it. It got as far as sandbox, which failed with the once-common C
compiler cannot create executables error. Of course I
tried
To clarify, when I try to run emerge -eav system, the first package which
fails is sandbox.
It advises me to try
FEATURES=-sandbox emerge sandbox
in response to the cannot run C compiled programs, but I still get the same
error. My research on the web points me back towards gcc not being
I had use the config file as
[global]
workgroup = ENG
netbios name = thewho
security = user
[mp3]
path = /home/mp3
read only = yes
create mask = 0777
directory mask = 0777
public = yes
guest only = yes
[sandbox]
path
the disadvantage of compiling in sandbox instead of
compiling directly with userpriv?
*advantage
If you do things like parallel builds (-j applied to emerge, not just
make), a sandbox can help keep the build environment consistent
throughout a build. (And if that's not a feature that's currently
Hallo ,
please help me. I try to install a new Gentoo with no-multilib (AMD64) ,
but compiling sandbox fails :
ebuild R ] sys-apps/sandbox-2.12
Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] y
>>> Verifying ebuild manifests
>>> Emerging (1 of 1) sys-apps/sa
:
error: C compiler cannot create executables
The screen said to attach the file
/var/tmp/portage/sandbox-1.2.17/work/build-x86-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/config.log
SNIP
checking for C compiler default output file name... configure: error:
C compiler cannot create executablesSee `config.log' for more
not even be possible to enable it in Gentoo builds or it may be
possible only in firefox-bin builds. From that article (which is by
Mozilla's CTO, by the way),
Mozilla will distribute the sandbox alongside Firefox, and we are
working on deterministic builds that will allow developers
Hi,
I hope somebody can help me.
I've written a new ebuild for "dev-python/imapclient-1.1.0" (the
latest version in the tree is version 0.13)
I've just copied dev-python/imapclient-0.13.ebuild and remove a patch
which is no longer needed.
Ebuilding this packages dies of
1 - 100 of 1472 matches
Mail list logo
