[gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

Am Wed, 5 Apr 2017 14:25:17 -0600 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > On 04/05/2017 12:22 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > > Am Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:40:32 -0600 > > schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > > > [snip] > >> > >> The problem with the cable was incorrect cross-over, the cable was > >> installed by a

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

On 04/05/2017 06:35 PM, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 04/05/2017 01:25 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: >> >> I think this cable tester was only designed to work with passive >> receiver (that came with it) on the other end. >> Using active part with switch doesn't give meaningful reading, it only >>

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

On 04/05/2017 01:25 PM, the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > > I think this cable tester was only designed to work with passive > receiver (that came with it) on the other end. > Using active part with switch doesn't give meaningful reading, it only > confirm that that are no broken wires inside. >

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

On 04/05/2017 12:22 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:40:32 -0600 > schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > [snip] >> >> The problem with the cable was incorrect cross-over, the cable was >> installed by a contractor few years back and terminated by them. >> >> When I initially tested the

[gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

Am Wed, 5 Apr 2017 09:40:32 -0600 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > On 04/05/2017 08:14 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: > > On 04/04/2017 03:11 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > >> > >> That's a good note. > >> > >> I think punch down is similar to LSA plus here in Germany, tho the > >> tools look very different.

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

On 04/05/2017 08:14 AM, Daniel Frey wrote: > On 04/04/2017 03:11 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: >> >> That's a good note. >> >> I think punch down is similar to LSA plus here in Germany, tho the >> tools look very different. But with LSA you also push the wire between >> to cutting contacts. >> > > Yeah,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

On 04/04/2017 03:11 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > > That's a good note. > > I think punch down is similar to LSA plus here in Germany, tho the > tools look very different. But with LSA you also push the wire between > to cutting contacts. > Yeah, it sounds like it works the same here: a wire is

[gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

Am Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:05:57 -0700 schrieb Daniel Frey : > On 04/04/2017 02:49 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > > No, if you have the same wrong on both sides, the LEDs will still > > show correct blinking order. Think of it like this: If you use order > > 7-5-3-1-2-4-6-8 on both sides,

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

On 04/04/2017 02:49 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > No, if you have the same wrong on both sides, the LEDs will still show > correct blinking order. Think of it like this: If you use order > 7-5-3-1-2-4-6-8 on both sides, blinking LED 1 on one side will blink > the same LED on the other side because they

[gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

Am Tue, 4 Apr 2017 15:05:13 -0600 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > On 04/04/2017 02:56 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > > Am Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:28:23 -0600 > > schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > > > [snip] > >> > >> I have reconnected another cable and the unit in remote location > >> works. Both cable

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

On 04/04/2017 02:56 PM, Kai Krakow wrote: > Am Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:28:23 -0600 > schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > [snip] >> >> I have reconnected another cable and the unit in remote location >> works. Both cable have a good pinout but one is working and the other >> is not. Both cable are

[gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

Am Tue, 4 Apr 2017 14:28:23 -0600 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > On 04/04/2017 10:02 AM, Mick wrote: > > On Tuesday 04 Apr 2017 09:12:16 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> On 04/04/2017 01:26 AM, Mick wrote: > [...] > > > [...] > > > > This may merely indicate they have been

[gentoo-user] Re: soliciting a DHCP lease / carrier lost

Am Tue, 4 Apr 2017 09:12:16 -0600 schrieb the...@sys-concept.com: > On 04/04/2017 01:26 AM, Mick wrote: > > On Monday 03 Apr 2017 20:21:28 the...@sys-concept.com wrote: > >> The new box I installed in remote location has a problem obtaining > >> IP address. The box was working perfectly on my