I am still waiting to hear from Ken and Lawrence on what they think about
these patches? Will any or all of them be implented in the next release?
Scott
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2002 12:41 PM +1000 Jeremy Howard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks to Jaska Kivela, some patch formatting problems
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Scott Adkins wrote:
I am still waiting to hear from Ken and Lawrence on what they think about
these patches? Will any or all of them be implented in the next release?
I don't know what Ken and Lawrence think of these patches, but I just
finished porting the child pid
I have users trying to check mail, they seem to authenticate fine,
judging by the logs, but they get the error (at least in mozilla)
[IN-USE] Unable to lock maildrop
and then they get prompted for username/password again.
Nothing obvious appears in my logs, and I haven't made any changes that
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Scott Russell wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:35:04AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I don't know about all the other patches, though. I have included the
safe_flock patches, and I *may* include the alarm and locking stuff in
master-avail.diff later, but I
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:35:04AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Scott Adkins wrote:
I am still waiting to hear from Ken and Lawrence on what they think about
these patches? Will any or all of them be implented in the next release?
I don't know what Ken
Here is the 2.1.4 port of the master process counting patch. It will be in
Debian's Cyrus IMAPd package 2.1.4-9, to be uploaded today or tomorrow.
None of the unrelated changes in the fastmail.fm patchset were included,
just the improvements to the tracking of the number of available workers.
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:52:39AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Scott Russell wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:35:04AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I don't know about all the other patches, though. I have included the
safe_flock patches,
We have recently noticed strange behaviour with our cyrus-imapd-1.0.14
installation. Lmtpd does not seem to forward auto-generated error messages
properly. When a cyrus-imap user sends a mail to a non-existent address, the other
MTA will typically respond with an error message with a null
On Wed, 15 May 2002, prune wrote:
I still have the same probleme as described. maybe the change was not
commited in 2.1.4 ??
It was, but it caused another bug that looks exactly the same in
particular configurations. The fix is to change line 5226 of configure
from:
Hi,
--On Tuesday, May 14, 2002 10:46 PM -0500 Alon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I have imapd running using sasl2 for authentication, but I'd like to add
| remote preferences support. Unfortunately, neither smlacapd nor imspd
| seem to support sasl2 in their current form. Is there any way to get
|
Rob Siemborski wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">
On Wed, 15 May 2002, prune wrote:
I still have the same probleme as described. maybe the change was notcommited in 2.1.4 ??
It was, but it caused another bug that looks exactly the same inparticular configurations. The fix is to
On Wed, 15 May 2002, prune wrote:
exactly what I did
then, another problem when compiling (after configure, during the make) :
Sorry, I misunderstood you, try this at the top of cyrusdb_skiplist.c:
#ifndef O_DSYNC
# ifdef O_SYNC
#define O_DSYNC O_SYNC /* POSIX */
#
Jev wrote:
I have users trying to check mail, they seem to authenticate fine,
judging by the logs, but they get the error (at least in mozilla)
[IN-USE] Unable to lock maildrop
and then they get prompted for username/password again.
Nothing obvious appears in my logs, and I haven't
I you are trying to use Berkeley DB 4.0 (and likely 3.3) on Mac OS X,
you will need the following patch or the mutexes will not work and you
will eventually encounter database corruption.
-kevin
I believe the appended patch
will make Berkeley DB run correctly on your Mac OS X system.
Please
Greetings,
I am currently attempting to make Cyrus authenticate via a PAM library
(like our Courier-IMAP system did), but have yet been able to accomplish
this. The following is my imapd.conf file and cyrus.conf file. The MTA I am
using is Postfix, but that seems to be functional.
What version of Cyrus? Assuming that you are using v2.1.x, set
sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
and start saslauthd with the '-a pam' option.
David Chait wrote:
Greetings,
I am currently attempting to make Cyrus authenticate via a PAM library
(like our Courier-IMAP system did),
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:34:29 -0400
From: Scott Adkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I am still waiting to hear from Ken and Lawrence on what they think about
these patches? Will any or all of them be implented in the next release?
I'm still wondering what causes these problems. Some
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 08:34:29 -0400
From: Scott Adkins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I am still waiting to hear from Ken and Lawrence on what they think about
these patches? Will any or all of them be implented in the next release?
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:37:50 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
I'm still wondering what causes these problems. Some reports say that
service processes aren't crashing; if they're not crashing, how is the
count getting off?
Good question,
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
Good question, isn't it? I am trying to track a segfault in the auth_unix
callbacks with SASL 2.1.2 [1], but after that I will try to do a once-over
the entire master flow, with and without the child pid tracking patches.
[1]
Here's a quick patch for reconstruct.c as of 2.0.16 to use the message
sent time instead of sbuf.mtime for previously-unseen mailboxes. This
fixes a problem (as the comment describes) with outlook using INTERNALDATE
for displaying / sorting messages.
(I might have sent this in once before around
So then i can assume it would be more proper to do LMTP over Unix Socket?
I can do either, i just am trying to find the best method to do this.
Thanks
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2002 8:10 AM -0500 Amos Gouaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 May 2002 12:09:14 -0600,
Scott M Likens [EMAIL
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:02:42 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
The point is, if that indeed happens, log or no log, master loses track of
the number of children that can service requests. That would be a bug, and
the patch supposedly fixes this bug.
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
service processes without one of those service processes crashing
(either by the sysadmin or otherwise) then there's some other problem
in the child accounting.
Well, anything that could cause the messages to be lost will cause trouble
for the
Hello,
Which is the most appropriate way to move specific mailboxes to a new
partition?
The way i tried it was by using the rename command following the
syntax:
. rename oldmailbox newmailbox newpartition
( where oldmailbox is the same with newmailbox ... if this makes any
difference )
Hello,
I had the impression that the removed tag after issuing the command
quota -f indicates that the user mailbox had been removed whereas the
corresponding quota file had not.
In that case the following output :
admin:~/opt/Cyrus/bin/quota -f
.
.
user.nvoutsin: removed
.
.
followed by
On Thu, 03 Jan 2002 13:23:55 -0700,
Scott M Likens [EMAIL PROTECTED] (sml) writes:
sml So then i can assume it would be more proper to do LMTP over Unix
sml Socket? I can do either, i just am trying to find the best method to
sml do this.
The properness depends on your environment. TCP is
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Amos Gouaux wrote:
to take advantage of single instance delivery. (The local delivery
agent in Postfix can only deliver one recipient at a time.)
Well, use the lmtp transport, then. It can deliver through an unix socket
just fine.
--
One disk to rule them all, One
Ahh...
Since the LMTP is well quite out of date i'm more or less trying to figure
out the password maps and everything i would need to setup. I guess i'll
wait for someone to update it and take another crack at it.
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:48 PM -0500 Amos Gouaux
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If you look in the Archive thru whatever web mailing list you wish, there
was someone who had mentioned using openssl how to create the CA,
the key,
and cert.
Look it up, it'd be worth your time.
No thanks, I wasn't asking for a HOWTO but for others' experiences.
I had already read the
Please change your system time (date !) ...
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 05:27:10PM -0700, Scott M Likens wrote:
Thanks
Luc
Actually the proper way is this,
Quite good url on how to be your Own CA
http://www.aet.tu-cottbus.de/personen/jaenicke/postfix_tls/doc/myownca.html
Look it up, modify it so you dont use des based pem's...
See mine is like this (imapd.conf)
tls_cert_file: /var/imap/cert.pem
lol sorry.. Clock seems to be resetting for some reason on my computer and
i'm not sure why.
Battery is fine and all... just every time i reboot it looses it.
--On Thursday, May 16, 2002 1:49 AM +0200 Luc Brouard
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please change your system time (date !) ...
On Thu,
Or, if you're in 2.0,
sasl_pwcheck_method: pam
should work fine.
Michael
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:50 PM -0400 Ken Murchison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
What version of Cyrus? Assuming that you are using v2.1.x, set
sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
and start saslauthd with the '-a
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2002 4:29 PM -0400 Lawrence Greenfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:02:42 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
The point is, if that indeed happens, log or no log, master loses
track ofthe number of
Anyone has any experience moving mail from exchange to cyrus-imapd? I have
tried fetchmail. Its not a great tool to move folders of all my users.
thx,
zod
Hi All,
I have the latest cyrus-imapd and sasl. I have moved my mailbox from
exchange to this server. During which something went wrong and I have ghost
mailboxes. When I list with lm in cyradm i see a bunch stuff which in
reality don't exist. I tried to do dm but they don't exist. They show
--On Wednesday, May 15, 2002 2:50 PM -0400 Lawrence Greenfield
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 15:37:50 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
We don't have this problem on any of our servers.
Do you have preforking enabled? If
Is there any progress on providing info-cyrus (and cyrus-sasl)
in digested form?
thanks
--
Mathias Körber |2385 Bay Road |Tel:+1-650-381.6044|Fax:+1-650-381.6055
Sr. Consult. Engr. |Redwood City |Direct Fax/Voicemail:+1-240-368.1170
Nominum, Inc. |CA 94063, USA |Private:
On Thu, 16 May 2002, Voutsinas Nikos wrote:
Which is the most appropriate way to move specific mailboxes to a new
partition?
The way i tried it was by using the rename command following the
syntax:
. rename oldmailbox newmailbox newpartition
That's how you do it.
Were any error
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I don't know what Ken and Lawrence think of these patches, but I just
finished porting the child pid tracking of master-avail.diff to 2.1.4CVS,
and will post that to this list soon. I will also include it in Debian,
which will give some field-testing to the
Lawrence Greenfield wrote:
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 16:02:42 -0300
From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[...]
The point is, if that indeed happens, log or no log, master loses track of
the number of children that can service requests. That would be a bug, and
the
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
Here is the 2.1.4 port of the master process counting patch. It will be in
Debian's Cyrus IMAPd package 2.1.4-9, to be uploaded today or tomorrow.
I'm not 100% sure, but I think the change you've made to return if the
centry isn't found may mean the
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Scott Russell wrote:
On Wed, May 15, 2002 at 10:35:04AM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
I don't know about all the other patches, though. I have included the
safe_flock patches, and I *may* include the alarm and locking
On Wed, 15 May 2002 20:04:27 -0300,
Henrique de Moraes Holschuh [EMAIL PROTECTED] (hdmh) writes:
hdmh On Wed, 15 May 2002, Amos Gouaux wrote:
to take advantage of single instance delivery. (The local delivery
agent in Postfix can only deliver one recipient at a time.)
hdmh Well, use the
On Thu, 03 Jan 2002 17:27:10 -0700,
Scott M Likens [EMAIL PROTECTED] (sml) writes:
sml Ahh...
sml Since the LMTP is well quite out of date i'm more or less trying to
sml figure out the password maps and everything i would need to setup.
sml I guess i'll wait for someone to update it and take
Yeah i noticed. But I find it a little nicer.
Just used lmtp:unix:/var/imap/socket/lmtp
Seems to work just dandy actually, much easier then TCP. Althought to be
honest TCP isnt a bad idea, having postfix on 1 server accepting the mail
and sending it to another server for storage.
Of Course
May 15 20:41:43 bonmaildev saslauthd[19131]: AUTHFAIL: user=dchait
service=imap realm= [PAM auth error]
This is what I received using the saslauthd -a pam option (pam didn't
work at all). Any ideas? I can't seem to find a reference for this error
anywhere.
-Original Message-
From:
what's your /etc/imapd.conf set to for sasl_pwcheck_method?
what's your /etc/pam.d/imap set to?
we need to know those to help trouble shoot... but...
if in /etc/imapd.conf reads...
...
sasl_pwcheck_method: saslauthd
and your /etc/pam.d/imap is:
# begin
authrequired
49 matches
Mail list logo
