Dear log4net community,
it is my pleasure to inform you, Dominik has been elected as a new
committer to the project. He's been active around here for quite some
time and will now be able to work on the code base directly. I'm sure
the project is going to benefit a lot from him.
Welcome Dominik
So I'm calling fileAppender.ActivateOptions to change the log file name
it
occasional generates a NullReferenceException, but the catch is that it
only
does it occasionally. It usually works.
The posts I've all read involve issues that would lead
fileAppender.ActivateOptions to fail all the
Hi Joe,
I would recommend You to implement a filter that matches your requirements
by implementing the IFilter interface or - even better - by subclassing
FilterSkeleton.
Cheers,
Dominik
_
From: Joe Udwin [mailto:joe.ud...@questionmark.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012
Hi Joe,
I would need to buffer huge volumes of other users messages in order to be
confident that the user who is in an exceptional state still had all their
messages in the buffer.
My approach would be as simple as this pseudo-code:
public abstract class YourFilter : FilterSkeleton {
Hi Kelly,
Configured like this the total maximum size of all log files should be
around 5MB * 10, which is somewhat like 50MB. Scaling either the size of a
single logfile (maximumFileSize) or the number of logfiles
(maxSizeRollBackups) by 2 should bring you to your 100MB, doesn't it?
Cheers
If I set
maximumFileSize=10MB and maxSizeRollBackups=10, I will get 10 files for a
Day with total size 100MB. During the next day (Day+1) I will get
another 10 files for the Day+1 with total size 100MB; the previous 10
files (ones for the Day) will NOT be removed when new files (for the
Day+1)
your computer and/or storage system.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C #
##
--
Dominik Psenner
://old.nabble.com/ListViewAppender%3A-ListView-always-null--tp34636403p34636403.html
Sent from the Log4net - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint
them or may not even be triggered at all, which obviously is
even worse.
Cheers,
D.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C #
##
=RollingFile /
/root
/log4net
Thank you very much.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint: 558641995F7EC2D251354C3A49C7E3D1B469318C #
##
On 01/02/2013 04:07 PM, Andrew Arnott wrote:
I noticed [an issue][1] is already filed for this. But it seems to be
dormant and the proposed fix was apparently difficult. I’ve added
comments to the issue that offer two alternatives for fixing it that
are both one-liners, and both arguably a
Hi,
did this happen near the end of the process lifetime (i.e. when you closed
the application that uses log4net for logging)?
Cheers,
D.
_
From: Dmitry Pogodin [mailto:lunatic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 11:38 AM
To: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
.
_
From: lunaticare [mailto:lunatic...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:36 PM
To: Log4NET User
Subject: Re: log4net:ERROR Failed to append to appender [EventLogAppender]
Hello Dominik,
you're right, this happens when application closes.
2013/1/9 Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
You're welcome and thanks for the Kudos.
2013/1/10 lunaticare lunatic...@gmail.com:
Dominik, you were right. Setting IsBackground=true did solve the problem.
Thank you very much for your assistance and such a great library!
2013/1/9 Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
In this case I would
Hi there,
Andrew Arnott posted that he is interested in nightly builds of log4net.
Therefore I am hereby raising a poll to see if also the
community is interested. Please post back with your opinion by placing a cross
and optionally a small comment. Just like this:
-- DUMMY --
[ ] Yes
[X] No,
Hi there,
the poll ended some hour ago and I wanted to give it a little more time. But
unfortunately that did not help and only a few people
participated. Even though 2 ouf of 4 people who shared their opinion are
interested in nightly builds, there does not seem to be
enough interest in the
Hi,
You provide not enough information so that someone could help you finding out
what's wrong. If you referenced the log4net DLL,
configured the appenders properly and are writing some log messages but still
nothing happens, it is always a good idea to enable
log4net's internal logging to
. if you are trying to use AdoNetAppender to log
into a SQL Server 1997 database).
Cheers,
D.
[1] http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/features.html#frameworks
[2] http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/hh367887.aspx
_
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent
Tigre el_tigre...@yahoo.com wrote:
All is setup correctly (I have used log4net in the past) but is not
working for my project with .net 4.5
And I must use .net 4.5
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C
settings
BasicConfigurator.Configure(); it gives me and error saying ...It's a method
but is used like a type
El TigreT C
_
From: Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
To: 'Log4NET User' log4net-user@logging.apache.org; 'El Tigre'
el_tigre...@yahoo.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 10
I'm glad you finally worked it out and I hope you learned something. In the
future you should consult the manuals and check if
you're doing things how it's written down in the manuals. Posting something
like all is setup correctly (I have used log4net in the
past) without being sure can cause
distributed load tests, and we’re standardizing on log4net
for logging in our test code.
Cheers,
Todd.
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C #
# Fingerprint
seriously doubt they
designed it to be easy to integrate 3rd party tools with, though I could
be wrong!
** **
** **
Thanks,
Todd.
** **
*From:* Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, May 06, 2013 11:12 AM
*To:* Log4NET User
*Subject:* Re: log4net
Hi
I'm wondering, how often does your deployment computer travel from one
timezone to another while it is powered on?
Cheers,
D.
Von: Warrick Wilson [mailto:guywithd...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 05:55
An: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Betreff: How to force
?
Hi,
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 11:31 AM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
I’m wondering, how often does your deployment computer travel from one
timezone to another while it is powered on?
Maybe its an app for use in aircraft? You never know...
Von: Warrick Wilson [mailto:guywithd
-threading. The CultureInfo properties
are, AFAIK, thread-static.
Cheers,
D.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. Mai 2013 13:13
An: 'Log4NET User'
Betreff: AW: How to force log4net to refresh timezone information?
In aircrafts
Good morning Yuvraj,
There's no way of being sure unless you have tried it out with your
application or a sample application that uses log4net in the same way you
do. Of course a sample application could do things faster than normal and in
an automated way so that the problem happens sooner
Hi
For what it's worth, the logging should be initialized with the default
settings. That happens to be a root logger and nothing more. So the apparently
working loggers may be just an illusion.
Cheers,
D.
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: psandler [mailto:psandle...@yahoo.com]
Gesendet:
This is most probably related to this:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd233102.aspx
http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/dd233102.aspx
Known as:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-347
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4NET-347
And fixed since revision:
Thanks for the links Dominik. Stefan B also said LOG4NET-318 is related to
this, and should be fixed after 1.2.11.
When I get a chance, I will try the 1.2.12 version.
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 10:39 AM
To: 'Log4NET User'
Subject
]
not found.
Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
I have tried Goggling for an answer but have not found anything.
Thanks.
Peter
--
Dominik Psenner
## OpenPGP Key Signature #
# Key ID: B469318C
On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi
The message indicates that something cannot be instantiated. Maybe you have
misspelled some class name or you have forgot to copy over a library?
Cheers
2013/8/13 Peter K
Hi Todd,
You happen to be on the wrong list. This is the log4net mailing list.
Cheers
Von: Todd Bradley [mailto:todd.brad...@nirvanix.com]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 28. August 2013 15:50
An: log4net-user@logging.apache.org
Betreff: Chainsaw
Years ago I when I first learned Apache
At this point I usually quote Hector Correa:
http://hectorcorrea.com/blog/log4net-thread-safe-but-not-process-safe
http://hectorcorrea.com/blog/log4net-thread-safe-but-not-process-safe
You can verify that log4net is indeed thread safe with a 3 liner console
application. However, most
http://logging.apache.org/log4net/release/sdk/log4net.Core.FixFlags.html
I think this is what you're looking for, isn't it?
Von: Rob Richardson [mailto:rdrichard...@rad-con.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 30. September 2013 15:05
An: Log4NET User
Betreff: What does the MemoryAppender's Fix()
]
Gesendet: Montag, 30. September 2013 16:37
An: Log4NET User
Betreff: RE: What does the MemoryAppender's Fix() method do?
Thank you very much. I understand now. But I note that in the link below,
it says that FixVolatileData() is now considered obsolete. Why is that?
From: Dominik
Good morning,
I've looked at the logfile [2] and all starts with the .log file not being
rolled cause the file is still open and thus can't be moved. The following
warnings are caused by the first error. So this is where the trouble starts:
log4net: Moving
It would be worth checking if your assumption is true by logging the process
id and the thread name (pattern layouts %processid and %thread).
Cheers
Von: Douglas Neary [mailto:dne...@miteksystems.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Januar 2014 23:24
An: Log4NET User
Betreff: RE: log4net
?
Thank you!
--
Dominik Psenner
I think that what he is searching for is the combination of MaxBackupIndex=3
and rolling style Once. Rolling by date won't work with the backup index
detection mechanisms.
Von: George Mauer [mailto:gma...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Dienstag, 18. Februar 2014 16:19
An: Log4NET User
Betreff: Re: AW:
Hi,
it is my pleasure to announce to the community
that Matt Sicker has joined our ranks.
He made remarkable contributions to LOG4J
and we all believe he is a valuable member
of Apache Logging Services now and in future.
Kind regards,
Dominik Psenner
Hello Herrmann
I don't think that works right now - at least not in a way such that I would
trust it. The trouble lies in situations where the application is stopped
for an arbitrary amount of time. It might become computationally intensive
to find every file created by the logger and the
going to make sure the application
does not execute from 11:30 - 12:30 and see if this helps it to roll the log
over correctly.
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, 27 May 2014 04:24 PM
To: 'Log4NET User'
Subject: AW: RollingFileAppender overwriting file
Just
Hey people,
this is a reminder that we're in the final weeks of the ApacheCon EU call
for paper and it will close at the end of the day of June 25th, whatever
timezone is latest. We are still looking for presentations for this event.
Check out this if you're interested:
is that the process runs on a Hyper-V virtualised server,
writing to a log file stored on a network share on a completely different
server.
Do you think anything related to this could cause the issue?
*From:* Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, 29 May 2014 10:01 PM
it manually, making sure not to use
double-quotes around the identifiers. Once I did that, I got the log
messages in the table as expected.
RobR
--
Dominik Psenner
Good morning
You can tell log4net to flush the buffer on specific events (see Evaluator
property in the class log4net.Appender.BufferingAppenderSkeleton). However, you
can have exactly one buffer size for each buffering appender because every
appender has exactly one buffer. You could
, randomGeneratedData = rad1
NDC = ndcTest1 ndcTest2 , randomGeneratedData = rad2
NDC = , randomGeneratedData = rad2
and so on ...
I tried to clear log4net.ThreadContext.Properties before filling it again
, but it was of no use. Please help.
--
Dominik Psenner
, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:38 AM, Ananth Tatachar
ananth.tatac...@gmail.com wrote:
Sorry I forgot to mention : My application is multithreaded and the
log4net version = 1.2.12
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:32 AM, Ananth Tatachar
ananth.tatac...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Dominik Psenner ,
Thanks a lot
or omissions in
the contents of this message which may arise as result of transmission. If
verification is required please request hard-copy version
--
Dominik Psenner
Hi Christopher,
I believe that you would have to create your own level evaluator
implementation. Basically you implement the interface log4net.Filter.IFilter
or, to make the interaction with the filter chain less painful, you extend
log4net.Filter.FilterSkeleton. There you can override the
of the machine with Win8.
Regards
Nitin
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 January 2015 18:44
To: 'Log4NET User'
Subject: AW: [External] AW: Log4Net RollingFileAppender not adding Custom
property in Win8/VS2013
Given that youve already enabled and checked log4nets
Howdie,
Heres a list of things that you could check:
* First of all enable log4nets internal debug logging, it may give
you a clue what he is doing
* Make sure to call log4net.Config.XmlConfigurator.Configure() after
setting the property
* Escape path separators
that property and create alone the file name as the datetime and
not the static value I have added. Its very surprising and I am banging my
head what changes are doing this to happen. :/
Regards
Nitin
From: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Sent: 07 January 2015 17:36
Dear Apache Logging enthusiast,
In just a few weeks, we'll be holding ApacheCon in Austin, Texas, and we'd
love to have you in attendance. You can save $300 on admission by
registering NOW, since the early bird price ends on the 21st.
Register at http://s.apache.org/acna2015-reg
ApacheCon this
version on the server is 3, on the laptop it is
4.
Liebe Grüsse/Cordialement/Cordialità
Thiemo Kellner
--
Office fédéral de la statistique
Espace de l'Europe 10
2010 Neuchâtel / Suisse
IT-AB
Tel +41 32 71 36516
Von: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Gesendet
Kellner
--
Office fédéral de la statistique
Espace de l'Europe 10
2010 Neuchâtel / Suisse
IT-AB
Tel +41 32 71 36516
Von: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Februar 2015 09:48
An: 'Log4NET User'
Betreff: AW: 64bit problem?
It might be a security
.
Liebe Grüsse/Cordialement/Cordialità
Thiemo Kellner
--
Office fédéral de la statistique
Espace de l'Europe 10
2010 Neuchâtel / Suisse
IT-AB
Tel +41 32 71 36516
Von: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Freitag, 27. Februar 2015 14:13
An: 'Log4NET User
IT-AB
Tel +41 32 71 36516
Von: Dominik Psenner [mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 26. Februar 2015 15:40
An: 'Log4NET User'
Betreff: AW: 64bit problem?
To be honest, the error message is rather cryptic to me. What I know is that
log4net is not compiled against
Hi,
from what I can recall it could happen that the formatted representation of a
logging event gets mixed up with data from other events and thus the characters
streamed to a sink become garbage (i.e. a file, console, ..) if this lock is
removed.
Internally a lot of things are cached
March 2015 at 15:38, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
from what I can recall it could happen that the formatted representation of a
logging event gets mixed up with data from other events and thus the characters
streamed to a sink become garbage (i.e
I’m taking this to log4net-dev since this goes well beyond the usage of log4net.
The pdb’s are not included because they are not required in a production
release and were never included in a release so far because most users do not
need them at all but could get confused with these files.
about IFilter.Decide? Should I assume it is not threadsafe?
Gert
On 4 March 2015 at 16:51, Dominik Psenner dpsen...@gmail.com
mailto:dpsen...@gmail.com wrote:
A log event might be badly programmed and recursive by definition. Think of two
objects that try each to log while trying
To be honest, the error message is rather cryptic to me. What I know is that
log4net is not compiled against a specific architecture. If the targeted
.NET framework is installed it should work. Have you checked that?
Von: thiemo.kell...@bfs.admin.ch [mailto:thiemo.kell...@bfs.admin.ch]
The concept behind how web applications work makes it hard to use file
appenders. A web application should not access a filesystem directly and
punching holes into permissions may not be advisable. If i had to work out
a web app i would log to the database that the web application will require
I think Piers wanted to know what differences between log4j and log4net
caused you to start this thread.
Cheers
On 2015-10-06 19:39, Nicholas Duane wrote:
I'm not aware of all the differences, though I am the one that started
this thread. From what I've been told, log4net was a port of log4j
rmissions’.
Finally, as best I can tell, none of this is relevant to the OP’s
actual issue, which would be just the same whether he was logging
to file or to database, because it’s a /configuration /issue.
*From: *Dominik Psenner
*Sent: *Sunday, 11 October 2015 2:35 PM
*To:
y entails ‘punching holes in permissions’.
Finally, as best I can tell, none of this is relevant to the OP’s
actual issue, which would be just the same whether he was logging
to file or to database, because it’s a /configuration /issue.
*From: *Dominik Psenner
*Sent: *Sunday, 1
lease come over and join.
> >
> > [1] thread starting with
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4net-dev/201508.mbox/%3C03be01d0da4f%24a85aaa10%24f90ffe30%24%40apache.org%3E
> <http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/logging-log4net-dev/201508.mbox/%3c03be01d0da4f$a85aaa10$f90ffe30$%40apache.org%3e>
> >
> > Stefan
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: log4j-user-unsubscr...@logging.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: log4j-user-h...@logging.apache.org
> >
>
>
--
Dominik Psenner
Given that both c# and java are very similar in both syntax and interpreter
that runs the bytecode, users of log4j can expect a very steep learning
curve when starting with log4net. Despite that log4net is based on log4j
and thus may lack some things found in log4j2. These missing things and the
Hi,
which exact log4net version did cause this issue? log4net older than
"last 3 years or so" leaves huge room for guessing. :-)
Cheers
On 2016-03-14 13:01, Kinnar wrote:
Hi All,
We are using log4net in our multi threaded windows service since last 3
years or so. We have recently
You're welcome!
Happy hacking,
Cheers
On 2016-03-18 09:14, Kinnar wrote:
Hi Dominik,
Thanks for your updates. We will try out and let you know. Thanks for your
directions.
Regards,
Kinnar
--
View this message in context:
s per other posts in
> same forum.
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Rolling-File-Operation-Failing-with-Source-does-not-exist-tp62802p62843.html
> Sent from the Log4net - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Dominik Psenner
>type="log4net.Appender.RollingFileAppender+UniversalDateTime" />
>
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Kinnar
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://apache-logging.6191.n7.nabble.com/Rolling-File-Operation-Failing-with-Source-does-not-exist-tp62802p62877.html
> Sent from the Log4net - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
Dominik Psenner
I dont have the issue number at hand, but this story sounds familiar and
there should be one filed on jira. If you have valuable information to add,
(ideally a patch) please use the search function to find the issue.
On 7 Feb 2017 9:02 a.m., "Martin Kozubek" wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
On 2016-09-08 06:05, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
Hi Justin
On 2016-09-08, Justin Taylor wrote:
I pulled down the source. It builds fine but the unit tests fail
(log4net.vs2012.sln). Is there some setup/prerequisites I've
overlooked?
Currently the official build system is the Nant build. I
ve on!
>> We really need more people who want to shape the future of log4net at
>> the Apache Software Foundation.
>> In all the time since log4net has been started by Nicko Cadell more
>> than ten years ago, there have never been more than two or three
>> people regularl
oundation.
>> In all the time since log4net has been started by Nicko Cadell more
>> than ten years ago, there have never been more than two or three
>> people regularly contributing to it. As is normal in open source
>> projects people have come and gone when their interests or just
ybody considers their issues the most important ones.
>
I tend to prioritize recent reports because the reporters of those old
issues most likely have found a workaround or moved to another logging
framework. Those issues are most likely to be closed because they are not
reproducable.
--
Dominik Psenner
What I am proposing here are a mere ideas that will need further
investigation. I have not tried any of these ideas. You will have to
prioritize these ideas based on your requirements.
A. Implement an extension class for the ILog interface
B. Implement a custom ILog interface implementation and a
e event.
> However I'm trying to move away from that as it was point out that our
> events don't fit well within the level gradient. So the new code for
> logging a compliance event does not use that level. Both the compliance
> and business event would be logged at the Emergenc
ased on the level,
> and I would like to do that without the user having to do anything, other
> than maybe including some config code which would allow me to inject my
> code into the equation.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
> --
> *From:* Domini
on for this. You could
> imagine that the LogManager could expose a set of events and allow plugging
> in event sinks via configuration. This would allow me to write an event
> sink and plug it into the system via the configuration.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Nick
>
>
Yet another possible solution to your problem could be to do something like:
https://www.loggly.com/blog/why-json-is-the-best-application-log-format-and-how-to-switch/
On 2016-10-24 07:39, Dominik Psenner wrote:
Ps: this might also something that you should look at.
http://stackoverflow.com
Level.Off = int.MaxValueLevel.Off + 1
On 2016-11-25 00:12, Piers Williams wrote:
All is not something you would log at, it's something to use as a
threshold for a logger that should log everything. Because it's lower
than all your message logging levels, they all get logged.
On 21 Oct
Ops, that earlier mail went out too early. Sorry for the noise. ;-)
Level.Off = int.MaxValue
Level.All = Level.Off + 1
This implies that:
Level.All = int.MinValue
which is correct. You should not log events with Level.All or Level.Off.
There are so many numbers in between int.MinValue and
Hi Dave,
would you please send us a the complete log4net internal logs including
debug logs?
Anyway it smells like an issue with incompatible binaries. You could
check if both the log4net assembly that your custom appender was linked
against and the log4net assembly that your application
Glad you were able to sort this out!
Cheers
On 2016-11-04 14:32, DaveS wrote:
Solved.
I had a reference to version 1.2.10 which was causing this version to be
loaded from the GAC.
--
View this message in context:
her diagnosing it would be appreciated. Was thinking
> that maybe I would have enabled log4net debugging?
>
That's a great starting point. Maybe something fishy jumps out that makes
it easier. You could further investigate the behavior of your web
application when the dead lock happened.
Please note also that 1.2.11 is from 2011 and rather old. Can you give a
newer log4net version a shot?
Cheers
--
Dominik Psenner
2017-05-22 23:54 GMT+02:00 Jim Scott <jsc...@infoconex.com>:
>
>
> *From:* Dominik Psenner
> *Sent:* Monday, May 22, 2017 1:27 PM
>
>
>
>> >> Please note that it is known that an application can also cause
>> log4net to deadlock [3].
>> >&
Hi Jim,
please don't expect a sensible response within hours, especially with
such a complex problem. :-) At first sight, if it did run for over two
years and suddenly keeps crashing on a daily basis it is very unlikely
that something that was not modified is the actual culprit. Did any
Hi fellows!
This is a call for opinions.
What does the community think should happen? Are there people out there who
use log4net-logviewer or any of its binaries?
Cheers,
Dominik
On 6 Sep 2017 3:08 p.m., "Oskar Gewalli" <gewa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 6 Sep 2017, at 15:
s was introduced in framework 4.5. (
https://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.security.
claims.claimsidentity.aspx). Why is the log4net dll referencing this class?
[image: Inline image]
Thanks and Regards
Mohkam Singh
------
*From:* Dominik Psenner <dpsen...@gmail
://www.post.japanpost.jp/yu-packprint-r/member/download/sqlinstall/
> YprSQL20170908_dotnetfxDL.zip
>
>
>
> Home page(In English):
>
> https://www.post.japanpost.jp/index_en.html
>
>
>
--
Dominik Psenner
Googling yields this:
https://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/378905e5-297b-4235-a170-f519d77f02b9/iis7-web-app-error-could-not-load-type-systemsecurityclaimsclaimsidentity-from-assembly?forum=csharpgeneral
On 12 Nov 2017 11:36 a.m., "Mohkam Singh Sawhney"
wrote:
>
Hi,
The mailing list bot allows you to subscribe and unsubscribe by yourself,
see https://logging.apache.org/log4net/mail-lists.html for
further information.
Shortly, subscription is as easy as sending an empty email to
dev-subscr...@logging.apache.org.
Cheers
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a
There is nobody working neither on a release, nore on netstandard 2.0
support. Get involved! Contributions of any form are welcome!
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
them.
On Mon, Nov 18, 2019, 17:16 Waeckers, Jan-Malte <
jan-malte.waeck...@homag.com>
. 2019 a las 14:35, Dominik Psenner ()
> escribió:
>
>> There is nobody working neither on a release, nore on netstandard 2.0
>> support. Get involved! Contributions of any form are welcome!
>> --
>> Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to fi
Hi,
as far as I know there is no maintainer that could create binaries signes
with the old key.
Warm regards,
Dominik
--
Sent from my phone. Typos are a kind gift to anyone who happens to find
them.
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021, 11:56 Rasa Mazutiene
wrote:
> Hi,
> would it be possible to release a
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo