* Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-12-2001 18:17]:
| René Clerc wrote:
| * Will Yardley [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-12-2001 17:15]:
|
| with postfix, just:
|| /usr/bin/procmail -t
|
|should be fine.
|
|the fancy sendmail style trickery shouldn't be necessary.
|
| But,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [31-12-2001 22:48]:
| % Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous
| % network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, and the rest of
| % you get to party (hopefully) :)
Trust me, I did!
| Oh, quit your whining -- you know
Alas! René Clerc spake thus:
| % Funny how I get to spend New Years Eve trying to make a heterogenous
| % network of Linux and Windows boxen work with each other, and the rest of
| % you get to party (hopefully) :)
Trust me, I did!
Lucky you... eight hours of work all I managed to do was
Alas! Rob 'Feztaa' Park spake thus:
- It's useful to be able to search for every message a specific person has
ever sent me.
True, but I don't often need to look for old messages. In fact, I don't
even know why I keep archives. ROFL :)
Ah, I remember now. I don't like the way mutt
I just had another thought: Might it make sense to store sent mail
together with normal messages?
A fundamental problem is that mutt's Search feature cannot search over
multiple mailboxes. Thus, if I want to review a series of e-mails that I
exchanged with someone about a specific topic, then it
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 02:26:46AM -0700, Rob 'Feztaa' Park wrote:
Happy 2002 to you all!
Lets hope it turns out better than the last one!
Why? Did something bad happen in 2002BC?
--
Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg22087/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Cliff, et al --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 10:53:39PM -0500, David T-G wrote:
%
% ...and then Philip Mak said...
% %
% % Is it possible to see the SMTP MAIL FROM line of a message in my
...
% If you mean the ^From_ line that looks about like
%
%
Hi
I'm getting 'failure to send' reports with the message
'localhost.localdomain does not exist.'
This only appears to happen on .dk adresses. When I send to a .com there
is no problem.
Any ideas on how to fix?
Cheers
--
Nick Wilson
Tel:+45 3325 0688
Fax:+45 3325 0677
Web:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
But it's used for message information, no? It becomes the ^From: line,
or at least so it appears. That's why it's so easy to fake and so on,
too, but it looks like whatever is put there would show up in the header.
It's not the ^From: line. For example,
(I've also posted this to comp.mail.mutt)
I'm encountering problems with getting my outbound mail to make the trip
to the recipient, particularly with errors about invalid sender
addresses, etc.
Here's my mail environment :
--
My local box ('vulcan', Red Hat 7.2, mutt
Hello Charles, hello ALL, and happy new year for everyone!
I'm new in this list, and not really fluent in english, sorry. But
it's a good day to begin. :-)
On Monday, December 31, 2001 at 11:15:10 AM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
I was able to request for receipt in my mail while using
We have qmail installed in our system and the default delivery mechanism
is Maildir.How can I configure mutt to read mails from Maildir.
Does mutt support Maildir format natively? If not is there a patch?
Thanks,
-- sudhir
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey all. I was just wondering if there was some way that I could get
mutt to automatically set up my mbox hooks for every folder in my ~/mail
directory, so that way I can subscribe to a new mailing list without
having to edit my .muttrc.
Right now I've got this set up:
mbox-hook =spam
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:24:57AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
I think he means the MAIL FROM that is part of the SMTP dialog that
goes on between MTA's.
If so my mail server puts it as part of the Received header like so:
Received: from ns.gbnet.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [194.70.126.10])
Ben, et al --
...and then Ben Reser said...
%
% On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:24:57AM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
% I think he means the MAIL FROM that is part of the SMTP dialog that
% goes on between MTA's.
%
% If so my mail server puts it as part of the Received header like so:
% Received:
Rob --
...and then Feztaa said...
%
% Hey all. I was just wondering if there was some way that I could get
% mutt to automatically set up my mbox hooks for every folder in my ~/mail
% directory, so that way I can subscribe to a new mailing list without
% having to edit my .muttrc.
%
% Right
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 05:16:49PM -0500, Sudhir Kumar wrote:
We have qmail installed in our system and the default delivery
mechanism is Maildir.How can I configure mutt to read mails from
Maildir.
I use:
set mbox=~/Maildir
set mbox_type=Maildir
set folder=~/Maildir
# directory with all
On Tue, 1 Jan 2002, Sudhir Kumar wrote:
We have qmail installed in our system and the default delivery mechanism
is Maildir.How can I configure mutt to read mails from Maildir.
Put this in /etc/profile (or equivalent file if your system use something
else):
MAIL=$HOME/Maildir/
Does mutt
Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 17:31:25 +0100
From: Nick Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: List-Reply problems
Hi
I'm having trouble replying to this list.
If I enter ,L for a 'list-reply' I get the @gbnet address come up as the
To field.
I now have 'subscribe [EMAIL
On 2002-01-01 10:03 +, Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2001 at 01:36:03PM +0100, Andre Majorel wrote:
On 2001-12-28 18:22 +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
I thought that
message-hook ~f joe@blow\.com pipe-message /usr/local/bin/unmangle
would do the trick
On Tue, Jan 01, 2002 at 09:05:40PM +0100, Alain Bench wrote:
Hello Charles, hello ALL, and happy new year for everyone!
I'm new in this list, and not really fluent in english, sorry. But
it's a good day to begin. :-)
On Monday, December 31, 2001 at 11:15:10 AM +0800, Charles Jie
Frankly it is a diabolical practise, causes uneccessary and pointless
mail. If a mail is so important that you *must* be certain it has been
read then phone the person up. Since the mechanism is inherently
unreliable anyway, what is the point of using it ?
Exactly. Every now and then, I
Mail consumes a lot of time.
Is it possible to have mutt record the time I use to read or write a
mail? I hope to know how much time I spend in a folder (a kind of info).
Further, I want a timer to alert me when I'm going to run out of the
pre-set time for reading or writing a mail.
Are the
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Charles Jie wrote:
Is it possible to have mutt record the time I use to read or write a
mail? I hope to know how much time I spend in a folder (a kind of info).
Further, I want a timer to alert me when I'm going to run out of the
pre-set time for reading or writing a
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:16:10AM -0500, Philip Mak wrote:
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, David T-G wrote:
But it's used for message information, no? It becomes the ^From: line,
or at least so it appears. That's why it's so easy to fake and so on,
too, but it looks like whatever is put there
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:28:00PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
Mail consumes a lot of time.
Is it possible to have mutt record the time I use to read or write a
mail? I hope to know how much time I spend in a folder (a kind of info).
Further, I want a timer to alert me when I'm going to run
Hi, all --
If I were writing something with, say, my brother and we both wanted to
sign it, we could each create a detached signature of the document and
then post it and the sigs somewhere, or even mail the lot around. We
could further put both of our addresses in the Reply-To: field,
Cliff, et al --
...and then Cliff Sarginson said...
%
% On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:28:00PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
% Mail consumes a lot of time.
%
% Is it possible to have mutt record the time I use to read or write a
% mail? I hope to know how much time I spend in a folder (a kind of
Hi,
I have set up my mailing lists to different addresses. To make it
easier to write mails, I have this line in my mutt.rc, and similar
lines for other mailing lists:
send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
However, this hook seems to catch too late, i.e. I see the
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:58:15PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Are the solution there? Or quick solution available?
A stopwatch, and/or an alarm clock.
Excuse me but this is Mr Dumb question of 2002 :)
I disagree, using a stopwatch means learning how to use it, then
remembering *to* use
Thorsten --
...and then Thorsten Haude said...
%
% Hi,
Hello!
%
% I have set up my mailing lists to different addresses. To make it
% easier to write mails, I have this line in my mutt.rc, and similar
% lines for other mailing lists:
% send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'set [EMAIL
Hi,
I have set up my mailing lists to different addresses. To make it
easier to write mails, I have this line in my mutt.rc, and similar
lines for other mailing lists:
send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
However, this hook seems to catch too late, i.e. I see the
System: OpenBSD 2.8
./configure --without-iconv
doesn't work:
checking for catalogs to be installed... de ru it es uk fr pl nl cs id sk ko el zh_TW
zh_CN pt_BR eo gl sv da lt tr ja hu et ca
configure: error: Unable to find an iconv function. See INSTALL for help
I read the INSTALL file, that's
Thank you for your answer, Philip. The idea is wonderful. Now it's
crystally clear to me. I'll roll up my sleeves to code it.
I've just got used to the built-in pager and thought their combination
is not bad. Thus I might not plan to replace it with 'less'.
Before I try to contribute mutt's
This is annoying. I've successfully compiled mutt without iconv by
commenting out lines in config.h, so I think that this is just a
braindead policy decision. Try commenting out the iconv test you quoted
below in configure, and see what happens when you configure and build
without iconv. Also
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:06:51PM +, Benjamin Smith wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 03:58:15PM +0100, Cliff Sarginson wrote:
Are the solution there? Or quick solution available?
A stopwatch, and/or an alarm clock.
Excuse me but this is Mr Dumb question of 2002 :)
I disagree,
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 11:22:36PM +0800, Charles Jie wrote:
Thank you for your answer, Philip. The idea is wonderful. Now it's
crystally clear to me. I'll roll up my sleeves to code it.
I've just got used to the built-in pager and thought their combination
is not bad. Thus I might not plan
I still have the \012 character problem with PGP-signed messages
in Mutt 1.3.25:
[-- Fin de sortie PGP --]
\012
[-- Les données suivantes sont signées --]
\012
I thought this bug was fixed. Or perhaps I have misunderstood...
--
Vincent Lefèvre [EMAIL PROTECTED] - Web: http://www.vinc17.org/ -
without iconv. Also note that for some reason the iconv macro is
defined twice in config.h: perhaps one of them is hardwired. So make
The reason is that the definition in acconfig.h is superfluous. At a
glance, it seems that about 20 definitions in acconfig.h are superfluous.
(See
Hi,
* David T-G [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-02 16:16]:
% I have set up my mailing lists to different addresses. To make it
% easier to write mails, I have this line in my mutt.rc, and similar
% lines for other mailing lists:
% send-hook '~t [EMAIL PROTECTED]' 'set [EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Makes
Hi,
* Charles Jie [EMAIL PROTECTED] [02-01-02 16:22]:
I've just got used to the built-in pager and thought their combination
is not bad. Thus I might not plan to replace it with 'less'.
You might try $display_filter.
Thorsten
--
Das Briefgeheimnis sowie das Post- und Fernmeldegeheimnis sind
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Thorsten Haude wrote:
I've just got used to the built-in pager and thought their combination
is not bad. Thus I might not plan to replace it with 'less'.
You might try $display_filter.
I was thinking about $display_filter... that command is indeed executed
when the user
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:20:14AM -0800, Claus Assmann wrote:
System: OpenBSD 2.8
./configure --without-iconv
doesn't work:
checking for catalogs to be installed... de ru it es uk fr pl nl cs id sk ko el
zh_TW zh_CN pt_BR eo gl sv da lt tr ja hu et ca
configure: error: Unable to find an
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
This is annoying. I've successfully compiled mutt without iconv by
commenting out lines in config.h, so I think that this is just a
braindead policy decision. Try commenting out the iconv test you quoted
below in configure, and see what happens
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:29:08AM -0800, Claus Assmann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002, Daniel Eisenbud wrote:
This is annoying. I've successfully compiled mutt without iconv by
commenting out lines in config.h, so I think that this is just a
braindead policy decision. Try
Claus Assmann writes:
System: OpenBSD 2.8
./configure --without-iconv
doesn't work:
The documentation in INSTALL is wrong. There is no --without-iconv
configure option, and configure does the right thing by bombing out.
I think this can be fixed, though :)
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:47:14AM -0500, David T-G wrote:
Are you sure that's not the RCPT TO: part?
Your right. This is what happens when I post late at night. :)
--
Ben Reser [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://ben.reser.org
I wish it need not have happened in my time, said Frodo.
So do I, said
On Wed, 02 Jan 2002 at 16:41:42 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
I still have the \012 character problem with PGP-signed messages
in Mutt 1.3.25:
[-- Fin de sortie PGP --]
\012
[-- Les données suivantes sont signées --]
\012
I thought this bug was fixed. Or perhaps I have misunderstood...
This behaviour is a bit strange on my OpenBSD 2.8 system:
$ ./mutt -f =mutt
123 kept, 3 deleted.
Between those two lines I read some mail and deleted 3.
At the end mutt asked me whether to (really) delete them.
I typed 'y' and then I had to hit return, which is different
from the old behaviour
The same bug also bites me, see in my pager I see a '?' instead of \012.
--
Benjamin Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED]
msg22134/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
My mutt in linux can not get along well with my mozilla in
windows. I found mutt maintains Status:, and mozilla Status: plus
X-Status. It looks there is something wrong with it.
To do some more experiments, I need documents about the (X-)Status:
field but I can not find.
Could anybody show me
Hi there,
looks like Outlook (specifically: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build
9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)) does something wrong when it base64-encodes a
message: single quote becomes \222. Instead of I'm not sure, mutt
would display I\222m not sure. Anyone else seeing this? How can I get
Attached is a patch which introduces two new variables, pgp_autoselectkey and
pgp_confirmhook, with defaults of 0/no and 1/yes respectively. The motivation
here is that when I use pgp-hook I really don't want to be asked if that's the
key I intended to use. Arguably, the confirmation is useful
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 09:04:56PM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Hi there,
looks like Outlook (specifically: X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build
9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)) does something wrong when it base64-encodes a
message: single quote becomes \222. Instead of I'm not sure, mutt
would
I just built and installed mutt 1.2.5.1. When I run mutt -v, it
reports that it's Mutt 1.2.5.1i (2000-07-28). Did someone forget to
update reldate.h?
Walt
msg22139/pgp0.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Tue 01/01/02 at 09:40 PM +0100, Thomas Roessler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
mutt-1.2.5.1 and mutt-1.3.25 have just been released.
These releases both fix a security hole which can be remotely
exploited.
May we be told the nature (if not the details) of the vulnerability?
--
Alas! David T-G spake thus:
In fact, I often don't save the original message, but only my outbound
reply with his message quoted in it. I can follow the conversation well
enough iand save *some* disk space (yes, I already save a lot of mail, but
This, from the
Alas! Benjamin Smith spake thus:
Happy 2002 to you all!
Lets hope it turns out better than the last one!
Why? Did something bad happen in 2002BC?
Yeah, that was a bad year for me. It was right near the end of the stone
age, and all these bronze tools were created. It was obvious that
I just recently started using the combination
fetchmail + procmail + mutt. Procmail seems to filter my incoming
mail OK and puts them in the appropriate mailboxes. But I am
seeing two things that dont seem right.
1. With mutt running, new mail that should be filtered appears to come into my
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 05:49:40PM -0800, Raynald Mompoint wrote:
I just recently started using the combination
fetchmail + procmail + mutt. Procmail seems to filter my incoming
mail OK and puts them in the appropriate mailboxes. But I am
seeing two things that dont seem right.
1. With
Windows-1252 is a superset of iso-8859-1 and includes a number of
additional characters.
http://czyborra.com/charsets/iso8859.html#CP1252
Windows users and their software usually mix in WIN-1252 chars in
iso-8859-1 text. I think of it as their problem more than yours.
It's their
maybe this is a dumb question, but is there a reason you can't do
change-folder in the browser?
-w
Hi, thank you, Alain, et al,
After reading Cliff's post and mutt's manual, I am not sure whether
Disposition-Notification-To: will do what I want.
It's said it's dealt with by MTA. And reports success when the
transmission succeeds. -- Does that mean the mail just succeessfully
drops into the
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 02:58:36 +0100
From: Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mail filtering with procmail
[...]
procmail and it's use of locks is one of the greatest mysteries on
earth (at least to a dummy like me)
Hi Cliff,
I see
On Thu, Jan 03, 2002 at 07:50:17AM +0100, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
Date: Thu, 3 Jan 2002 02:58:36 +0100
From: Cliff Sarginson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mutt Users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: mail filtering with procmail
[...]
procmail and it's use of locks is one of the greatest
Date: Wed, 2 Jan 2002 20:23:04 -0600
From: Robert A. Knop Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Magnus Bodin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: mutt-users [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: \222 instead of '
Windows-1252 is a superset of iso-8859-1 and includes a number of
additional characters.
66 matches
Mail list logo
