Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Anybody using a current SAMBA on omniosce?

Hi Andries, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Andries Annema" > An: "Stephan Budach" , > omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com > Gesendet: Montag, 22. Oktober 2018 19:32:57 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Anybody using a current SAMBA on > omniosce?

[OmniOS-discuss] Anybody using a current SAMBA on omniosce?

Hi, I was wondering, if anyone is using a current version of SAMBA on their omniosce? If yes, I suppose that there's no package for anything later than 4.4, or is there? Also, does anybody know, if Samba makes use of the File Event notification API? Cheers, Stephan smime.p7s

[OmniOS-discuss] How to safely remove/replace NVMe SSDs

Hi, I have purchased two if those Supermicro NVMe servers: SSG-2028R-NR48N. Both of them are equipped with 24x Intel P DC4500 U.2 devices, which are obviously hot-pluggable, at least they seem to be. ;) At the moment, I am trying to familiarize myself with the handling of those devices

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] NVMe under omniOS CE

Shoot - please forgive my ignorance… uncommenting strict-version in nvme.conf sloved that. Cheers, Stephan - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > An: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> > Ge

[OmniOS-discuss] NVMe under omniOS CE

Hi, I finally got the first of my two Supermicro 2028R-N48M NVME servers. I installed the latest omniOSce on it and as it seems, it doesn't recognize the NVMe drives.This box is equipped with 24x Intel DC P4500, PCIe 3.1 NVMe. Does anybody know, why those are not recognized? Thanks,

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Investing into the Future of OmniOS Community Edition

+1 Cheers, Stephan - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Guenther Alka" > An: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Montag, 27. November 2017 10:15:47 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Investing into the Future of OmniOS Community > Edition > >

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac?

Hi, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Geoff Nordli" > An: "Chris Ferebee" > CC: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Sonntag, 26. November 2017 07:54:20 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac? > > Hi

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac?

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "David Ledger" <david.led...@ivdcs.co.uk> > An: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> > Gesendet: Freitag, 24. November 2017 19:26:44 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac? &

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac?

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Geoff Nordli" > An: "Manuel Oetiker" > CC: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Freitag, 24. November 2017 18:05:17 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac? > > What

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac?

Hi Geoff, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Geoff Nordli" <geo...@gnaa.net> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > CC: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> > Gesendet: Freitag, 24. November 2017 18:06:52 >

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac?

Hi Geoff, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Geoff Nordli" > An: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Freitag, 24. November 2017 03:56:01 > Betreff: [OmniOS-discuss] Best way to share files with Mac? > > Hi. > > I have to support a few mac

[OmniOS-discuss] omniOS/Samba/Kerberos?

Hi, has anybody ever tried to authenticate a SMB client, e.g. a Mac, to a Samba server running on omniOS via Kerberos? My plan is to have our Macs get a ticket from our AD server and then have them logged in into our file servers via a valid Kerberos ticket. Would this work only using a

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] 2TB vs 4TB NVMe drives?

Hi Bob, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Bob Friesenhahn" <bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > CC: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> > Gesendet: Dienstag, 14. November 2

[OmniOS-discuss] 2TB vs 4TB NVMe drives?

Hi, we are planning on purchasing a Supermicro NVMe server with 48 .U2 slots. I intended to initially load it with 24 x 2TB DC P4500, leaving 24 slots empty. Now… I've been also offered an Intel chassis with only 24 slots and thus the offer also included the 4TB P4500s. Just without

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS based redundant NFS

Hi Sergey, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "sergey ivanov" <serge...@gmail.com> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > CC: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> > Gesendet: Freitag, 29. September 2017 22:30:3

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] write amplification zvol

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "anthony omnios" > An: "Richard Elling" > CC: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 28. September 2017 09:56:42 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] write amplification zvol > Thanks

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS based redundant NFS

Hi Sergey, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "sergey ivanov" <serge...@gmail.com> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > CC: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 23:

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS based redundant NFS

Hi Sergey, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "sergey ivanov" > An: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 27. September 2017 21:31:05 > Betreff: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS based redundant NFS > > Hi, > as end-of-life of r151014 approaches,

[OmniOS-discuss] [SOLVED] Re: Can't destroy ZFS

Shoot… ;) Right after hitting the send button, I issued this: root@omnios:~# zdb -d vmpool Dataset mos [META], ID 0, cr_txg 4, 20.1M, 309 objects Dataset vmpool/nfsZimbraData [ZPL], ID 82, cr_txg 29169, 41.0K, 16 objects Dataset vmpool/esxi [ZPL], ID 49, cr_txg 20, 40.7G, 119 objects Dataset

[OmniOS-discuss] Can't destroy ZFS

Hi, after having received a zvol from my old S11 box vis zfs send/recv and being unable to re-import the LUN via stmfadm, I decided to remove that zvol/ZFS and start over. However, I cannot remove that particular ZFS and trying to do so yields this strange error: root@omnios:~# zfs

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: COMSTAR and blocksizes

> > - Ursprüngliche Mail - > > > Von: "Johan Kragsterman" <johan.kragster...@capvert.se> > > > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > > > CC: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com > > > Gesendet: Donnersta

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: COMSTAR and blocksizes

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > An: "Johan Kragsterman" <johan.kragster...@capvert.se> > CC: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. September 2017 12:22:06 > Betreff: Re

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: COMSTAR and blocksizes

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Johan Kragsterman" <johan.kragster...@capvert.se> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > CC: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 7. September 2017 12:08:45 > Betreff: Ang: [Om

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Loosing NFS shares

Hi Oliver, Von: "Oliver Weinmann" An: "Tobias Oetiker" CC: "omnios-discuss" Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017 09:13:27 Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Loosing NFS shares Hi, Don’t think so:

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Loosing NFS shares

Hi Oliver, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Oliver Weinmann" > An: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2017 08:45:14 > Betreff: [OmniOS-discuss] Loosing NFS shares > Hi, > we are using OmniOS for a few months now and have

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] NFS & SMB connection freezes 30-40 second sometimes.

- Ursprüngliche Mail - Hi Özkan, > Von: "Özkan Göksu" > An: "Dan McDonald" > CC: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Mai 2017 16:09:18 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] NFS & SMB connection freezes 30-40

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Quick Test of r151021 ISO Install using Xen HVM and an "xdf" Device

Hi, I have started out by simply copying the Xen disk image over to a omniOS host, where I attached the disk image using lofiadm. I then immediately tried zpool import -d /dev/lofi, but that didn't output anything. I then ran prtvtoc on the lofi device: root@tr1207410:/tr1207410data01#

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Quick Test of r151021 ISO Install using Xen HVM and an "xdf" Device

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Dan McDonald" <dan...@omniti.com> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de>, "Dan McDonald" > <dan...@omniti.com> > CC: "Prakash Surya" <prakash.su...@delphix.com>, "omni

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Quick Test of r151021 ISO Install using Xen HVM and an "xdf" Device

Ha ha… yeah… I will try. Howerver, without any network connectivity, I will be having quite a hard time getting those dumps from the guest anywhere. Cheers, Stephan - Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Dan McDonald" <dan...@omniti.com> An: "Stephan Budach" <

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Quick Test of r151021 ISO Install using Xen HVM and an "xdf" Device

Hi, following-up on this thread, I managed to get the current r151021 ISO booting and installing on my Oracle VM Xen host - yay!! I have installed and tweaked /etc/system such as that the system boots up sucessfully. However, I am unable to configure the network card, since as soon as I am

[OmniOS-discuss] dladm shows -NaN für LACP bond

Hi, I was just checking the states of my LACP bonds on my omniOS boxes, due to some scheduled maintenace work on our Nexus switches, when I came across one box that does work normally, but where dladm shows no stats for one of the two LACP bonds, when running dladm show-aggr -s:

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Bloody update on Repo, plus Kayak for ISO is almost beta

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > An: "Jens Bauernfeind" <bauernfe...@ipk-gatersleben.de> > CC: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März 2017 16

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Bloody update on Repo, plus Kayak for ISO is almost beta

Bummer… - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Jens Bauernfeind" <bauernfe...@ipk-gatersleben.de> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > CC: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Bloody update on Repo, plus Kayak for ISO is almost beta

Hi Jens, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Jens Bauernfeind" > An: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Donnerstag, 9. März 2017 11:23:32 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Bloody update on Repo, plus Kayak for ISO is > almost beta >

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Quick Test of r151021 ISO Install using Xen HVM and an "xdf" Device

Hi Prakash, - Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Prakash Surya" > An: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. März 2017 01:55:19 > Betreff: [OmniOS-discuss] Quick Test of r151021 ISO Install using Xen > HVM and an "xdf" Device > Hey All, > I just

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] new supermicro server

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Dan McDonald" > An: "Geoff Nordli" > CC: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. März 2017 07:44:30 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] new supermicro server > > You didn't mention

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] new supermicro server

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Dan McDonald" > An: "Geoff Nordli" > CC: "omnios-discuss" > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 8. März 2017 02:21:20 > Betreff: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] new supermicro server > > > > On Mar 7, 2017, at

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS - Kayak for ISO alpha

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Dan McDonald" <dan...@omniti.com> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > CC: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com>, "Dan McDonald" > <dan...@omniti.com>

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS - Kayak for ISO alpha

- Ursprüngliche Mail - > Von: "Dan McDonald" <dan...@omniti.com> > An: "Stephan Budach" <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> > CC: "omnios-discuss" <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com>, "Dan McDonald" > <dan...@omniti.com> >

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS - Kayak for ISO alpha

Hi Dan - Ursprüngliche Mail - > It MIGHT, and you're the sort of person I need to confirm/deny it. > > Watch for a kebe.com link later today. > > Dan > > Well, I just got it a shot on my Oracle VM cluster and after the iso loaded, it threw this on the screen: BTX loader 1.00

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] CALL FOR VOLUNTEERS - Kayak for ISO alpha

Hi Dan, would that allow me to run OmniOS on a Xen-based Oracle VM? Frankly, I didn't manage to get that one up due to restrained resources on my end - and it since hasn't been pressing enough… ;) Cheers, Stephan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] SMB and Netatalk

- Ursprüngliche Mail - Von: "Adam Feigin" An: omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2017 09:47:50 Betreff: [OmniOS-discuss] SMB and Netatalk On 15/02/17 18:16, omnios-discuss-requ...@lists.omniti.com wrote: > From: F?bio Rabelo

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Moving The Root Pool

Hi Andre, well, I wouldn't call it dead… there is a way to accomplish, what you want and I had already performed such an action before. However, I cannot recall all the steps necessary. Looking at the link Dan provided, the steps lined out in the document are still valid and I don't think

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] issue importing zpool on S11.1 from omniOS LUNs

Am 31.01.17 um 00:15 schrieb Richard Elling: On Jan 29, 2017, at 3:10 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi, just to wrap this up… I decided to go with 15 additional LUNs on each storage zpool, to avoid zfs complainign about replication mismatches. I know, I cluld hav

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] issue importing zpool on S11.1 from omniOS LUNs

Hi, just to wrap this up… I decided to go with 15 additional LUNs on each storage zpool, to avoid zfs complainign about replication mismatches. I know, I cluld have done otherwise, but it somehow felt better this way. After all three underlying zpools were "pimped", I was able to mount the

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] issue importing zpool on S11.1 from omniOS LUNs

Hi Richard, Am 26.01.17 um 20:18 schrieb Richard Elling: On Jan 26, 2017, at 12:20 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de <mailto:stephan.bud...@jvm.de>> wrote: Hi Richard, gotcha… read on, below… "thin provisioning" bit you. For "thick provisioning&quo

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Fwd: Install on Supermicro DOM=low space left

Hi Fábio, Am 26.01.17 um 12:22 schrieb Fábio Rabelo: sorry, I forgot to change address to all list before send ... -- Forwarded message -- From: Fábio Rabelo Date: 2017-01-26 9:21 GMT-02:00 Subject: Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Install on Supermicro DOM=low

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] issue importing zpool on S11.1 from omniOS LUNs

Just for sanity… these are a couple of errors fmdump outputs using -eV root@solaris11atest2:~# fmdump -eV TIME CLASS Jan 25 2017 10:10:45.011761190 ereport.io.pciex.rc.tmp nvlist version: 0 class = ereport.io.pciex.rc.tmp ena = 0xff37bc9a861

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] issue importing zpool on S11.1 from omniOS LUNs

Hi Richard, gotcha… read on, below… Am 26.01.17 um 00:43 schrieb Richard Elling: more below… On Jan 25, 2017, at 3:01 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de <mailto:stephan.bud...@jvm.de>> wrote: Ooops… should have waited with sending that message after I rebootet the S11.1

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] issue importing zpool on S11.1 from omniOS LUNs

Ooops… should have waited with sending that message after I rebootet the S11.1 host… Am 25.01.17 um 23:41 schrieb Stephan Budach: Hi Richard, Am 25.01.17 um 20:27 schrieb Richard Elling: Hi Stephan, On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:54 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de <mailto:steph

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] issue importing zpool on S11.1 from omniOS LUNs

Hi Richard, Am 25.01.17 um 20:27 schrieb Richard Elling: Hi Stephan, On Jan 25, 2017, at 5:54 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de <mailto:stephan.bud...@jvm.de>> wrote: Hi guys, I have been trying to import a zpool, based on a 3way-mirror provided by three omniOS box

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] issue importing zpool on S11.1 from omniOS LUNs

hat system is still > imprinted in the vdev labels for the zpool (not the hostid of the system you > are trying to import on) > > Have you tried 'zpool import -f vsmPool10' ? > > /dale > >> On Jan 25, 2017, at 12:14 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: >

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Error updating R018 to R020

e… I forgot, that I had some older JRE installed, due to some application which doesn't run with newer ones. Undone that and the update to 020 went just fine. Sorry for the noise… Stephan smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

[OmniOS-discuss] Error updating R018 to R020

Hi, I just tried updating one of my 018 nides to 020 and got this: DOWNLOAD PAKETE DATEIEN ÜBERTRAGUNG (MB) Geschwindigkeit Abgeschlossen397/397 13177/13177 289.9/289.9 1.4M/s PHASE ELEMENTE

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 18.01.17 um 17:38 schrieb Stephan Budach: Am 18.01.17 um 17:32 schrieb Dan McDonald: Generally the X540 has had a good track record. I brought up the support for this a long time ago, and it worked alright then. I think Dale has an X540 in-house which works fine too (he should confirm

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 18.01.17 um 17:32 schrieb Dan McDonald: Generally the X540 has had a good track record. I brought up the support for this a long time ago, and it worked alright then. I think Dale has an X540 in-house which works fine too (he should confirm this). Some other things to check: * Is your

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 18.01.17 um 09:01 schrieb Dale Ghent: On Jan 18, 2017, at 2:38 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Am 17.01.17 um 23:09 schrieb Dale Ghent: On Jan 17, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Am 17.01.17 um 17:37 schrieb Dale Ghent: On

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 17.01.17 um 23:09 schrieb Dale Ghent: On Jan 17, 2017, at 2:39 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Am 17.01.17 um 17:37 schrieb Dale Ghent: On Jan 17, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi Dale, Am 17.01.17 um 17:22 schrie

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 17.01.17 um 17:37 schrieb Dale Ghent: On Jan 17, 2017, at 11:31 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi Dale, Am 17.01.17 um 17:22 schrieb Dale Ghent: On Jan 17, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi guys, I am sorry, but I do h

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Hi Dale, Am 17.01.17 um 17:22 schrieb Dale Ghent: On Jan 17, 2017, at 11:12 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi guys, I am sorry, but I do have to undig this old topic, since I do now have three hosts running omniOS 018/020, which show these pesky issues with fl

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Hi guys, I am sorry, but I do have to undig this old topic, since I do now have three hosts running omniOS 018/020, which show these pesky issues with flapping their ixgbeN links on my Nexus FEXes… Does anyone know, if there has any change been made to the ixgbe drivers since 06/2016?

[OmniOS-discuss] omniOS r018 crashed due to scsi/iSCSI issue

Basic Rules for Online Safety 1st - "If you didn't go looking for it, don't install it!" 2nd - "If you installed it, update it." 3rd - "If you no longer need it, remove it." http://krebsonsecurity.com/2011/05/krebss-3-basic-rules-for-online-safety Stephan Budach H

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Does anyone know about a 10GbE Quad-Port NIC for omniOS?

under OmniOS. /dale On Jan 11, 2017, at 6:05 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi guys, I am wondering, if anyone knows about a Quad-Port 10 GbE NIC, that is supported by omniOS? Of course, I could just stuff two X540s in the box, but maybe someone knows about a solid

[OmniOS-discuss] Does anyone know about a 10GbE Quad-Port NIC for omniOS?

Hi guys, I am wondering, if anyone knows about a Quad-Port 10 GbE NIC, that is supported by omniOS? Of course, I could just stuff two X540s in the box, but maybe someone knows about a solid alternative. Cheers, budy smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] format doesn't show all disks in the system

Hi Dale, Am 05.12.16 um 16:29 schrieb Dale Ghent: What does running: devfsadm -v tell you? It could be that you added this drive and the dev links weren't made for some reason. /dale On Dec 5, 2016, at 7:41 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi, I do have two r018 s

[OmniOS-discuss] format doesn't show all disks in the system

Hi, I do have two r018 systems, which are equipped with three different types of disks. When I run format it doesn't show all of the connected disks and leaves out the Intel 3700 SSDs. OmniOS 5.11 omnios-r151018-ae3141d April 2016 root@nfsvmpool06:/root# format Searching for

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] LX for OmniOS update

Hi Dan, I'd love to be able to actually spend any time on this, but my workload doesn't allow it… I hope to get into this at the end of september. Don't give up on it, please… ;) Cheers, Stephan Am 09.08.16 um 10:05 schrieb Peter Tribble: Dan, I've not heard from anyone, so I'm going

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Bloody Update for July 19th

Awesome! I will try that out asap. Cheers, Stephan ___ OmniOS-discuss mailing list OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss

[OmniOS-discuss] Chasing down scsi-related warnings

Hi all, I am having trouble chasing down some network or drive-related errors on one of my OmniOS r018 boxes. It started by me noticing these errors in the syslog on one of my RSF-1 nodes. These are just a few, but I found almost every drive/LUN of that target node mentioned in the syslogd on

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ZPOOL disk performance on Supermicro with LSI 9300-8i

Am 23.06.16 um 14:10 schrieb qutic development: Am 23.06.2016 um 01:06 schrieb Josh Barton : Any ideas why the HP is so much faster? It just has one Smart Array Controller which I didn’t think would be faster than JBOD Could you please provide a few more information

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 03.06.16 um 15:42 schrieb Fábio Rabelo: Hi to all A question: This are the board you used ? https://www.supermicro.com/products/motherboard/Xeon/C600/X10DRi-T4_.cfm If so, this board uses Intel X540, and this issue are only with Intel X550 chips ! Fábio Rabelo Yes, this is the board I

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Hi Dale, Am 17.05.16 um 20:55 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 17, 2016, at 8:30 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: I have checked all of my ixgbe interfaces and they all report that now flow controll is in place, as you can see: root@zfsha01colt:/root# dladm show-linkp

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Error when trying to install OmniOS r018 on new SM X100DRi-T4+

Am 27.05.16 um 15:18 schrieb Stephan Budach: Hi, I just tried to install OmniOS r018 onto a new SuperMicro server and when the install kernel starts up, I am getting this panic: cpu1: featureset WARNING: cpu1 feature mismatch panic[cpu1/thread=f00f4920c40: unsupported mixed cpu monitor

[OmniOS-discuss] Error when trying to install OmniOS r018 on new SM X100DRi-T4+

Hi, I just tried to install OmniOS r018 onto a new SuperMicro server and when the install kernel starts up, I am getting this panic: cpu1: featureset WARNING: cpu1 feature mismatch panic[cpu1/thread=f00f4920c40: unsupported mixed cpu monitor/nwait support detected The the hosts

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 11.05.16 um 19:28 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 11, 2016, at 12:32 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: I will try to get one node free of all services running on it, as I will have to reboot the system, since I will have to change the ixgbe.conf, haven't I? This is a RSF-

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 11.05.16 um 16:48 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 11, 2016, at 7:36 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Am 09.05.16 um 20:43 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Am 09.05.16 um 16:33 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 11.05.16 um 14:50 schrieb Stephan Budach: Am 11.05.16 um 13:36 schrieb Stephan Budach: Am 09.05.16 um 20:43 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Am 09.05.16 um 16:33 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Stephan

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 11.05.16 um 13:36 schrieb Stephan Budach: Am 09.05.16 um 20:43 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Am 09.05.16 um 16:33 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote:

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 09.05.16 um 20:43 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9, 2016, at 2:04 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Am 09.05.16 um 16:33 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi, I have a strange behaviour where OmniOS om

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Am 09.05.16 um 16:33 schrieb Dale Ghent: On May 9, 2016, at 8:24 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi, I have a strange behaviour where OmniOS omnios-r151018-ae3141d will break the LACP aggr-link on different boxes, when Intel X540-T2s are involved. It first

[OmniOS-discuss] ixgbe: breaking aggr on 10GbE X540-T2

Hi, I have a strange behaviour where OmniOS omnios-r151018-ae3141d will break the LACP aggr-link on different boxes, when Intel X540-T2s are involved. It first starts with a couple if link downs/ups on one port and finally the link on that port negiotates to 1GbE instead of 10GbE, which

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] R151018: kernel panic when iSCSI target goes south

Hi Dan, Am 25.04.16 um 16:23 schrieb Dan McDonald: This one is a NULL pointer dereference. If you're still running with kmem_flags = 0xf, the dump will be especially useful. Dan Sent from my iPhone (typos, autocorrect, and all) On Apr 25, 2016, at 3:27 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.

[OmniOS-discuss] R151018: kernel panic when iSCSI target goes south

Hi, I have been struck by kernel panics on my OmniOS boxes lateley, when any one of the target hosts, where the system get it's LUNs from, experiences a kernel panic itself. When this happens, my RSF-1 node immediately panics as well. Looking at the vmdump, it shows this:

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Slow scrub on SSD-only pool

Am 22.04.16 um 19:28 schrieb Dan McDonald: On Apr 22, 2016, at 1:13 PM, Richard Elling wrote: If you're running Solaris 11 or pre-2015 OmniOS, then the old write throttle is impossible to control and you'll chase your tail trying to balance scrubs/resilvers

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Slow scrub on SSD-only pool

djust zfs_vdev_scrub_max_active." I had to increase my zfs_vdev_scrub_max_active parameter higher than 5, but it sounds like the default setting for that tunable is no longer satisfactory for today's high performance systems. On Sun, Apr 17, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Slow scrub on SSD-only pool

Am 17.04.16 um 20:42 schrieb Dale Ghent: On Apr 17, 2016, at 9:07 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Well… searching the net somewhat more thoroughfully, I came across an archived discussion which deals also with a similar issue. Somewhere down the conversation, this par

[OmniOS-discuss] Slow scrub on SSD-only pool

Hi all, I am running a scrub on a SSD-only zpool on r018. This zpool consists of 16 iSCSI targets, which are served from two other OmniOS boxes - currently still running r016 over 10GbE connections. This zpool serves as a NFS share for my Oracle VM cluster and it delivers reasonable

[OmniOS-discuss] Panic when trying to remove an unused LUN with stmfadm

Hi, I have experienced this issue a couple of times now. First in r016 but just today on r018, too. When trying to remove a LUN by issueing something like root@nfsvmpool05:/root# stmfadm delete-lu 600144F04E4653564D504F4F4C303538 packet_write_wait: Connection to 10.11.14.49: Broken pipe

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS r151018 is now out!

our pkg update. Dan Sent from my iPhone (typos, autocorrect, and all) On Apr 15, 2016, at 12:57 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi Dan, I actually ran into this issue, when tying to upgrade my 016 to 018: root@zfsha01colt:/root# pkg update -v --be-name=OmniOS-r151018 ent

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] OmniOS r151018 is now out!

Hi Dan, I actually ran into this issue, when tying to upgrade my 016 to 018: root@zfsha01colt:/root# pkg update -v --be-name=OmniOS-r151018 entire Creating Plan (Es wird auf widersprüchliche Aktionen geprüft): / pkg update: Folgende Pakete stellen widersprüchliche Aktionstypen in

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] RSF-1/ZFS panics node when offlining one iSCSI storage mirror

Hi Dan, Am 07.03.16 um 15:41 schrieb Dan McDonald: On Mar 6, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: when I noted that one node would panic, AS A RULE -- if you have an OmniOS box panic, you should save off the corefile (vmdump.N) and be able to share it with th

[OmniOS-discuss] RSF-1/ZFS panics node when offlining one iSCSI storage mirror

Hi, I have set up a rather simple RSF-1 project, where two RSF-1 nodes connect to two storage heads via iSCSI. I have deployed one network and two disc heatbeats and I was trying all sorts of possible failures, when I noted that one node would panic, if I offlined an iSCSI target on one

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Testing RSF-1 with zpool/nfs HA

Am 18.02.16 um 21:57 schrieb Schweiss, Chip: On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 5:14 AM, Michael Rasmussen <m...@miras.org <mailto:m...@miras.org>> wrote: On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:13:36 +0100 Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de <mailto:stephan.bud...@jvm.de>> wrote:

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Testing RSF-1 with zpool/nfs HA

On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:13:36 +0100 Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de <mailto:stephan.bud...@jvm.de>> wrote: > > So, when I issue a simple ls -l on the folder of the vdisks, while the switchover is happening, the command somtimes comcludes in 18 to

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Testing RSF-1 with zpool/nfs HA

Am 18.02.16 um 12:14 schrieb Michael Rasmussen: On Thu, 18 Feb 2016 07:13:36 +0100 Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: So, when I issue a simple ls -l on the folder of the vdisks, while the switchover is happening, the command somtimes comcludes in 18 to 20 seconds, but somet

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Testing RSF-1 with zpool/nfs HA

Am 18.02.16 um 09:29 schrieb Andrew Gabriel: On 18/02/2016 06:13, Stephan Budach wrote: Hi, I have been test driving RSF-1 for the last week to accomplish the following: - cluster a zpool, that is made up from 8 mirrored vdevs, which are based on 8 x 2 SSD mirrors via iSCSI from another

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Testing RSF-1 with zpool/nfs HA

tried UDP instead? /dale On Feb 18, 2016, at 1:13 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi, I have been test driving RSF-1 for the last week to accomplish the following: - cluster a zpool, that is made up from 8 mirrored vdevs, which are based on 8 x 2 SSD mirrors via iSCS

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Testing RSF-1 with zpool/nfs HA

(or bad things will happen). Just a thought. Michael Sent from my iPhone On Feb 17, 2016, at 10:13 PM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote: Hi, I have been test driving RSF-1 for the last week to accomplish the following: - cluster a zpool, that is made up from 8 mirrored

[OmniOS-discuss] Testing RSF-1 with zpool/nfs HA

Hi, I have been test driving RSF-1 for the last week to accomplish the following: - cluster a zpool, that is made up from 8 mirrored vdevs, which are based on 8 x 2 SSD mirrors via iSCSI from another OmniOS box - export a nfs share from above zpool via a vip - have RSF-1 provide the

Re: [OmniOS-discuss] Ang: Re: Ang: zvol snapshot rollback issue, dataset busy

Am 16.02.16 um 18:58 schrieb Johan Kragsterman: Hi! -"OmniOS-discuss" <omnios-discuss-boun...@lists.omniti.com> skrev: - Till: <omnios-discuss@lists.omniti.com> Från: Stephan Budach Sänt av: "OmniOS-discuss" Datum: 2016-02-16 17:44 Ärende: Re: [Om

  1   2   >