Tried a lot of things. Don't seem to be able to get it any better. I'll have
the neg. scanned & printed in Tzaneen next week & compare.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Alan C
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 8:37 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A peaceful scene
Ken, I'm
Picasso.
> On 24 Mar 2017, at 02:29, Bruce Walker wrote:
>
> That's great, Mark. Reminds me of an specific artist -- can't think of
> his name. Darn.
>
>
>> On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:13 PM, Mark C wrote:
>>
Gonz, glad you liked it but see my discussion with Ken.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Gonz
Sent: Thursday, March 23, 2017 9:23 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: A peaceful scene
Very cool Alan!
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 8:08 AM, Alan C wrote:
Ken, I'm still on a learning curve.
I eventually tracked down the original print! The colours are virtually
identical but it is sharper. (I did sharpen a bit). I am having some
difficulty getting MF spot on in spite of the confirm beep. However, in this
case I now see I had the neg. in back to
Turned off the SR. Perhaps this is a bit sharper?
https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/33492007091/
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Alan C
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 10:36 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A peaceful scene
Tried a lot of things. Don't seem to be
Beautifully positioned in an ideal setting.
Love the B, Chris
J
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Mitchell"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 6:25:58 AM
Subject: My attempt at car photography!
While I was going
On 24/3/17, Chris Mitchell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>While I was going through masses of negatives to decide on my PUG 20
>entry, I came across a session that I did for a friend who has a 1970s
>Aston Martin V8. I'd be interested in what the car buffs on the list
>think of this:
>
While I was going through masses of negatives to decide on my PUG 20
entry, I came across a session that I did for a friend who has a 1970s
Aston Martin V8. I'd be interested in what the car buffs on the list
think of this:
Thanks Paul, I was hoping that you'd respond. It was late evening, but
I realise from your point and looking at the shadow cast by the car,
it was probably parked the wrong way round! 90 degrees rotation would
have had the sunlight illuminating the side. Schoolboy error...
If I ever get another
Thanks Jack. Forgot to say that it was Ilford FP4 - probably using a
Z1 and Pentax-A 28mm.
Chris
On 24 March 2017 at 13:36, Jack Davis wrote:
>
> Beautifully positioned in an ideal setting.
> Love the B, Chris
>
> J
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Chris Mitchell"
Nicely rendered, but too wide a lens for my taste. It yields a "fat front end"
look. In addition to a longer focal length, a polarizer would have served you
well. Finally, try to shoot at magic hour when the light comes from a low
angle. That will illuminate the car's flanks.
Paul via phone
>
On 24/3/17, Chris Mitchell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Thanks Cotty. That's 2 votes for a polariser...
In this day and age when everything can be done in Photoshop, and to a
similar extent in video editing and SFX software, I tend not to use any
filters - except for one, and only for video. I
On 24 March 2017 at 17:29, mike wilson wrote:
> Three. Also very brave, wetting a 1970s Aston. Did it ever run again?
>
A chamois leather was produced as soon as I'd finished and it was bone
dry in seconds...
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Thanks, Bruce. Well you mentioned that I recalled some mobiles I saw
long ago, but I don't recall who did them. (It wasn't Calder and he's
the only mobile maker whose name I can think of). The photographer Karl
BLossfeldt did tons of tendril photos and that was my direct inspiration.
Mark
> On 24 March 2017 at 17:38 Chris Mitchell wrote:
>
>
> On 24 March 2017 at 17:29, mike wilson wrote:
> > Three. Also very brave, wetting a 1970s Aston. Did it ever run again?
> >
> A chamois leather was produced as soon as I'd finished and
Three. Also very brave, wetting a 1970s Aston. Did it ever run again?
> On 24 March 2017 at 14:25 Chris Mitchell wrote:
>
>
> Thanks Cotty. That's 2 votes for a polariser...
>
> Chris
>
> On 24 March 2017 at 13:59, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> > On
Well I took Ann's advice and went out to look at the earlier PUGs
downloaded the files and tried a few old, (strange how a technique from
only 15 years or so ago is now "old"). tricks from the bad old days and
strangely the results weren't unusable at least for the web.
I still hope to find
Chris Mitchell wrote:
While I was going through masses of negatives to decide on my PUG 20
entry, I came across a session that I did for a friend who has a 1970s
Aston Martin V8. I'd be interested in what the car buffs on the list
think of this:
Nice, especially the badge shot. If somebody forced me to have a car, I'd want
an Aston Martin. I think they're the car version of a Roberts bike.
B
> On 24 Mar 2017, at 13:37, Jack Davis wrote:
>
>
> Beautifully positioned in an ideal setting.
> Love the B, Chris
>
>
On 24/3/17, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I thought that all you had to do to get that effect in England was to
>park a car outdoors for an hour or two.
That's Scotland.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
Which is like the next county over in Texas right?
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:24 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 24/3/17, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>I thought that all you had to do to get that effect in England was to
>>park a car outdoors for an hour or
It can be destructive stuff. I also have English Ivy and Wild Grape
growing along the fence line and those can be even worse.
On 3/23/2017 10:49 PM, Bill wrote:
We were growing a Virginia Creeper in our house. I realized when it
started climbing the wall that it was rooting into the drywall.
This big red beauty never landed in a spot that would afford a clear shot, but
I was pleased that the K-1 autofocus proved accurate enough to ignore the
foreground branch and let me focus on the bird.
https://www.photo.net/photo/18366863/big-red
Paul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
I like the way you captured him in his natural environment.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> This big red beauty never landed in a spot that would afford a clear shot,
> but I was pleased
Joan Miro?
On 3/24/2017 2:51 PM, Mark C wrote:
Thanks, Bruce. Well you mentioned that I recalled some mobiles I saw
long ago, but I don't recall who did them. (It wasn't Calder and he's
the only mobile maker whose name I can think of). The photographer Karl
BLossfeldt did tons of tendril
https://xkcd.com/1814/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
:-)>
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://lyons-ryan.org/southernlight/
On Sat, Mar 25, 2017, at 02:01 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> https://xkcd.com/1814/
>
> --
--
--
--
http://www.fastmail.com - Access all of your messages and
A bit of follow-up ...
The weekly brunch is a sub-group of a nature photography group - CNPA
Carolinas Nature Photography Association.
Grandfather Mountain regulars will know who I'm referring to.
This guy recently joined the local group here in the Triangle.
As I mentioned, he had a specific
Can you believe they made a movie about bok/
http://www.rogerebert.com/reviews/bokeh-2017
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
On 25 Mar 2017, at 00:42, Bruce Walker
> wrote:
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Bill
> wrote:
On 3/22/2017 8:20 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Artist, stylist, photographer and
On Thu, Mar 23, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Bill wrote:
>
> On 3/22/2017 8:20 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
>>
>> Artist, stylist, photographer and model Annie McDayter in lingerie,
>> taken in low ambient light in the studio. A smidge NSFW.
>>
>>
> On 24 March 2017 at 21:24 Steve Cottrell wrote:
>
>
> On 24/3/17, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I thought that all you had to do to get that effect in England was to
> >park a car outdoors for an hour or two.
>
> That's Scotland.
Wales. I still
My comments are based on personal preference. And my personal preference is
based partly on what publications want. Some photographers do like the wide
angle look, but I’ve never been a fan. Here, if you had rotated the car, you
would probably have had to deal with your shadow to get the right
> On Mar 23, 2017, at 11:54 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> John Sessoms wrote:
>
>> But that got me thinking overnight & I decided to submit a more general
>> question to the group wisdom.
>>
>> Given a new photographer who already has a "pro-sumer" DSLR, what advice
>>
Thanks Cotty. That's 2 votes for a polariser...
Chris
On 24 March 2017 at 13:59, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 24/3/17, Chris Mitchell, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>While I was going through masses of negatives to decide on my PUG 20
>>entry, I came across a session that I
Punch line: Well, you did pick the ugly one.
Fill in the rest and don't tell me.
On 3/24/2017 10:00 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 23/3/17, Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
You get pretty girls, I get a dog.
Got access to any pretty dogs? ;-)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Thanks Alan. And it is a nice car - he's still got it. It was scanned
on an Epson V600. I see from the other thread that you're doing battle
with a copy setup. I've tried various alternatives to scanning,
including a slide copier and photographing on a light box using a
macro lens, and can't get
A bit sharper, I guess, but it now seems to have an "unreal" quality to my
eye.
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 7:29 AM, Alan C wrote:
> Turned off the SR. Perhaps this is a bit sharper?
>
> https://www.flickr.com/photos/wisselstroom/33492007091/
>
Dan Matyola
On 23/3/17, Bill, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You get pretty girls, I get a dog.
Got access to any pretty dogs? ;-)
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 23/3/17, Mark Roberts, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Go to a library and look at books of photography. Lots of them.
Sound advice.
My son's girlfriend loves shooting candid pics on her phone and asked me
for advice. I found an old digital camera lurking in a drawer, gave her
that, and
Yeah. In optics, "real is positive" so negatives must be unreal.
I'm going to take them down.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 2:53 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A peaceful scene (redo)
A bit sharper, I guess, but it now
Well, it looks pretty good to me. The car too. Did you scan the neg?
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Chris Mitchell
Sent: Friday, March 24, 2017 3:25 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: My attempt at car photography!
While I was going through masses of negatives to decide on my
42 matches
Mail list logo