DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar пишет:
For me XFS seemed very fast. But usually I use ext3, which is proven
to be stable enough for most situations.
I feel also that xfs if much faster than ext3 and reiserfs, especially
when it deals with metadata. In some bulk operation (bulk changing
attributes
Wietse Venema wrote:
Bryan Irvine:
How long ago was that? I had the precise problem and had been told
that particular bug has been fixed. My problems were ~5 years ago.
Except that I'm never going to use it anyway because I just can't
force myself to trust it. I've used Postfix under ext3,
Nikita Kipriyanov:
DULMANDAKH Sukhbaatar ?:
For me XFS seemed very fast. But usually I use ext3, which is proven
to be stable enough for most situations.
I feel also that xfs if much faster than ext3 and reiserfs, especially
when it deals with metadata. In some bulk operation
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Does XFS still overwrite existing files with zeros, when those
files were open for write at the time of unclean shutdown? This
I believe this was fixed in an early 2.6.2x release, cc'ing xfs mailing
list to confirm.
would violate a basic
Justin Piszcz:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Does XFS still overwrite existing files with zeros, when those
files were open for write at the time of unclean shutdown? This
I believe this was fixed in an early 2.6.2x release, cc'ing xfs mailing
list to confirm.
would
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Justin Piszcz:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
Does XFS still overwrite existing files with zeros, when those
files were open for write at the time of unclean shutdown? This
I believe this was fixed in an early 2.6.2x release, cc'ing
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, Wietse Venema wrote:
would violate a basic requirement of Postfix (don't lose data after
fsync). Postfix updates existing files all the time: it updates
queue files as it marks recipients as done, and it updates mailbox
files as it appends mail.
If there is a response
Eric Sandeen:
This
would violate a basic requirement of Postfix (don't lose data after
fsync). Postfix updates existing files all the time: it updates
queue files as it marks recipients as done, and it updates mailbox
files as it appends mail.
As long as postfix is looking after data
Dave Chinner:
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 11:37:58AM -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Eric Sandeen:
This
would violate a basic requirement of Postfix (don't lose data after
fsync). Postfix updates existing files all the time: it updates
queue files as it marks recipients as done, and it
Charles Marcus ha scritto:
On 10/29/2008, Joe Sloan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
All our production boxes are 100% reiserfs, and have been for some
years, based on performance testing. They have been rock solid, and most
of them have 800 day uptimes at this point. I did some performance
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:53:30PM +0100, Simone Felici wrote:
I've also hear people who have had nightmares with ext3...
No filesystem is perfect.
No filesystem is perfect, that's certainty so.
Sure, no filesystem exhibits *optimal* performance under all work-loads,
but in terms of
On Oct 29, 2008, at 1:29 AM, Simone Felici wrote:
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist
too, but have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something
is different, also I would ask you...
Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
I'm going to migrate
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:09:46AM -0700, Jay Chandler wrote:
I would create the system on EXT3 (RHES) and the following
partitions on rieserfs:
/var/spool/postfix AND the partition that will contain all mails in
MailDir format.
At the moment the server has ~100.000 mailboxes and more or
Joe Sloan wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Simone Felici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Postfix-Users!
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
also I would ask you...
Which
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 10:47 AM, Randy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Sloan wrote:
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Simone Felici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Postfix-Users!
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too,
but have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile
Bryan Irvine:
How long ago was that? I had the precise problem and had been told
that particular bug has been fixed. My problems were ~5 years ago.
Except that I'm never going to use it anyway because I just can't
force myself to trust it. I've used Postfix under ext3, ffs(openbsd),
Victor Duchovni wrote, at 10/30/2008 12:44 PM:
Past reports of ReiserFS on this list indicate that it falls short
of reasonable (i.e. perfect) data integrity expectations.
I also value data integrity over performance and will add that XFS never
made it out of my punishment closet into a
Victor Duchovni wrote:
On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 03:53:30PM +0100, Simone Felici wrote:
I've also hear people who have had nightmares with ext3...
No filesystem is perfect.
No filesystem is perfect, that's certainty so.
Sure, no filesystem exhibits *optimal* performance
On Oct 30, 2008, at 10:18 AM, Victor Duchovni wrote:
Mounting user maildirs via NFS is supported, mounting the P
Doh, my error. You are of course correct-- this was in a pre-maildir
environment, so /var/mail was mounted via NFS; the moving parts for
Postfix lived on FreeBSD's UFS.
For me XFS seemed very fast. But usually I use ext3, which is proven
to be stable enough for most situations.
--
Regards
Dulmandakh
* Simone Felici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Postfix-Users!
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
also I would ask you...
Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
I'm going to
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
also I would ask you...
Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
I'm going to migrate a mailserver with EXT3 (and qmail) to a new
* Simone Felici [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
also I would ask you...
Which filesystem do you use on your mailserver?
I'm going to migrate a
Stefan Förster ha scritto:
Conclusion: Don't put valuable data on ReiserFS. Don't do premature
optimization. You can always change filesystems if your tests show
performance gains and you run into performance shortages.
Cheers
Stefan
Thank you for the answer, I'll take a look to your tests
Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Simone Felici [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Postfix-Users!
I know, there is enough written on the net and on the mailinglist too, but
have found only old results, maybe the meanwhile something is different,
also I would ask you...
Which filesystem do you use on your
On 10/29/2008, Joe Sloan ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
All our production boxes are 100% reiserfs, and have been for some
years, based on performance testing. They have been rock solid, and most
of them have 800 day uptimes at this point. I did some performance
comparisons a few months ago and
26 matches
Mail list logo
