Helo,
Is somebody able to guide me?
I have Postfix as gateway machine. It is mixed and has some
local virtual mailboxes for domains, and for others it acts as an incoming
relay forwarding to an internal Postfix.
The working is very good but now I have a tiny hitch. Until now I have been
able
I get a very quick banner response when I telnet to port 25 and port
587 I do get different banners
for port 25 I get:
220 *
Cisco Pix running SMTP 'Fixup' ?
Hello.
Postfix is new to me and I have spent many hours of reading and testing.
I do not have much experience to look at things and say they are normal or not.
My Postfix hosts some virtual domains locally, and it also relays some
others to another Postfix. It looks up virtual domains, relay
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 10:39 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
Hello.
Postfix is new to me and I have spent many hours of reading and testing.
I do not have much experience to look at things and say they are normal or
not.
...
Please may I ask someone to reassure me
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:05 -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de:
In simple, When I send a mail to @example.com, postfix
must
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 17:10 +0100, Clunk Werclick wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:05 -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:00 PM, Ralf Hildebrandt
ralf.hildebra...@charite.de wrote:
* Ralf Hildebrandt ralf.hildebra...@charite.de
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:21 -0400, Linux Addict wrote:
I tried digging, I get the MX servers on the ANSWER section. I manage
DNS as well, so I know its resolving correctly.
Just one thing Sir and a shot in the water. Restart Postfix (not
reload). I was having a problem where it kept looking up
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 12:27 +0700, Olivier Nicole wrote:
Hi,
I want to know if the following canonical rewrite is possible with
Postfix, and how?
In my LDAP directory, for each user, I have a givenName and a
familyName attributes.
The canonical name should be givenName.familyName or
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 12:34 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
On Tue, 2009-07-21 at 10:39 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
Hello.
Postfix is new to me and I have spent many hours of reading and testing.
I do not have much experience to look at things and say
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 20:31 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
2009/7/22 Clunk Werclick clunk.wercl...@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk:
What I am not understanding is this is my list:
debug_peer_list,fast_flush_domains,mynetworks,permit_mx_backup_networks,qmqpd_authorized_clients,smtpd_access_maps
I
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 11:04 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
I think perhaps 4-12 queries per message is not optimal?
If server handle 50,000 a day X 12 that is quite a lot? I don't think
it is going to get may fields returned for .co.uk .uk in my database?
Postfix does
On Wed, 2009-07-22 at 10:31 -0600, Robert Lopez wrote:
We get a lot of spam from a marketing company that uses hundreds of ip
addresses and hundreds of domain names but it always comes from
support at which ever names they are using that day.
My supervisor wants me to block all email coming
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:50 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
You need to ask yourself if this is a real problem, or something
you're just imagining. Mysql generally works fine, 50,000 messages a
day at 12 queries each, equates to several queries per second. This is
an easy load.
That is a comfort
mails
Date:
Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:47:54 +1000
(09:47 BST)
2009/7/23 Clunk Werclick clunk.wercl...@wibblywobblyteapot.co.uk:
That is a comfort to know. My main concern was this hammering was
not
optimal, but it is welcome to make as many queries as it likes
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:24 +0200, Thomas Gelf wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 13:50 +1000, Barney Desmond wrote:
You need to ask yourself if this is a real problem, or something
you're just imagining. Mysql generally works fine, 50,000 messages a
day at 12 queries each
On Thu, 2009-07-23 at 11:57 +0200, Thomas Gelf wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
That is very reassuring Thomas, thank you.
Now I don't know if I should stay with SQL or drop to maps ? It is
easier to configure with SQL from a web based front end - but to get SQL
to dump to flat files
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 22:22 +0930, Nick Sharp wrote:
Hi all,
I am new to this list, so forgive me if I am not up with your current level
of etiquette, I do tune in pretty quickly.. so starting with a long email..
Been trying to stop people sending email to us setting FROM as a user in our
On Wed, 2009-07-29 at 23:26 +0930, Nick Sharp wrote:
This is how I block those pesky spoof mail spams;
EDIT main.cf
smtpd_recipient_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks
permit_sasl_authenticated
reject_unauth_destination
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 08:59 +0200, Ralf Hildebrandt wrote:
* Evan Platt e...@espphotography.com:
At 03:59 PM 7/29/2009, you wrote:
It looks like somebody is trying to figure out my internal users as
evidenced by log excerpts below. Is there something I could do to, if
not prevent this,
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 22:45 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Jeff Grossman wrote:
have seen articles about exporting the Exchange users via LDAP and putting
them in an access map file on the Postfix server, but I am not a big fan of
that. I would prefer to just query the Exchange server
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
Hi,
i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users.
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-courier-mysql-centos5.1
After i finished i got several errors that i fixed but im stuck on this:
Jul 31
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 11:40 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
Clunk Werclick schreef:
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:16 +0200, Ruud v.d Burg wrote:
Hi,
i followed this guide for setting up postfix with virtual users.
http://www.howtoforge.com/virtual-users-and-domains-postfix-courier-mysql
On Fri, 2009-07-31 at 09:50 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
On Thu, 2009-07-30 at 22:45 -0500, Noel Jones wrote:
Jeff Grossman wrote:
have seen articles about exporting the Exchange users via LDAP and putting
them in an access map file on the Postfix server, but I am
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 11:56 +0200, Willy De la Court wrote:
Hi all,
Just a question about spam prevention and resource optimalisation.
What is the best way to go. I have this as spam prevention at the moment.
smtpd_helo_restrictions =
permit_mynetworks,
permit_sasl_authenticated,
On Sun, 2009-08-02 at 17:04 -0400, Jon wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
PRE DNSBL 321
NO PTR 201
SPOOFING 120
RELAY ATTEMPTS0
BLOCKED OTHER0
WHITELISTED4
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 08:29 +0200, Willy De la Court wrote:
On Sun, 02 Aug 2009 17:04:17 -0400, Jon jo...@iotk.net wrote:
Clunk Werclick wrote:
PRE DNSBL 321
NO PTR 201
SPOOFING 120
RELAY
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 16:52 +1000, Thomas wrote:
Hey,
[..]
Yes, I use that too - but I like a quick summary on demand.
See: http://www.mikecappella.com/logwatch/
You can use the scripts _without_ logwatch and get an instant summary of
your mail.log.
Cheers,
Thomas
Indeed it does and
On Mon, 2009-08-03 at 16:08 -0400, Wietse Venema wrote:
Get rid of the backscatter:
http://www.postfix.org/BACKSCATTER_README.html
Wietse
Has anybody implemented something like this with Postfix?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bounce_Address_Tag_Validation
Any observations or advice?
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 08:12 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter wrote:
You need the milter capabilities from Postfix 2.6. Use the
batv-milter.
That's all I know at the moment.
I am confused? batv-milter? Is it not pvrs? I see this:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/batv-milter/
The idea looks very
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 04:17 -0400, Dave wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to adjust my current antispam measures as they are no
longer working. I'm running postfix 2.3 on a rel5 machine. I've got the
below, which is a postconf -n output of my current configuration. To it i'd
like to add spf, and
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 11:44 +0200, Robin Smidsrød wrote:
Lukas Ruf wrote:
Please find attached the header_checks file currently in use:
When I comment the line in main.cf
header_checks = pcre:/etc/postfix/header_checks.pcre
everything works for me as expected. Thus, I
On Wed, 2009-08-05 at 09:44 +0200, Robert Schetterer wrote:
LuKreme schrieb:
On Aug 4, 2009, at 3:42, Thomas Gelf tho...@gelf.net wrote:
the person who did not correctly set up the network is to be blamed,
if you have equipment acting as MTA it should be configured the right
way,
Hello,
I have been toying with the best way to produce a report of 'allowed'
messages that have made it all the way through my Postfix. I love the
Postfix logs, they give such detail on failures and refusals and parsing
this is quite straightforward.
The entertainment commences when I try to
On Wed, 2009-09-02 at 18:22 +0200, Benny Pedersen wrote:
On ons 02 sep 2009 18:07:27 CEST, LuKreme wrote
who says this ip is dynamic, just becurse the hostname look like
it is ?
Erm don't be naive. If they can't be bothered to have a better
rDNS then I can't be bothered to get their
From:
Clunk Werclick
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Reply-to:
mailbacku...@googlemail.com
Cc:
postfix-users@postfix.org
Subject:
Re: relay_domains
vs
virtual_mailbox_domains
Date:
Tue, 08 Sep 2009
09:28:36 +0100
Mailer:
Evolution
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 13:27 +0200, no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote:
Hello postfix users
We have approx 150 customers that wish to do marketing email with their
customers, and we have had these customers knowing former spam listing,
because they / we did not cope feedback loops, list retrieval and all
On Tue, 2009-09-08 at 14:02 +0200, no_s...@cardiff.fr wrote:
[Humour on]Wooow
{snip}
The answer is you check your logs, write a script to check your logs and
update your databases - or use one of the many mailing list manager
programs that exist. Postfix is simply the MTA. In fact I guess
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 07:16 +0100, Steve Heaven wrote:
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 00:27 +0200, mouss wrote:
Steve Heaven a écrit :
the old: try to pass to next, until final server accepts or rejects
is n more acceptable. recipients must be checked at the edge.
postfix provides
38 matches
Mail list logo
