Please see the job ad below -- this postdoc at A looks like it might
be of interest for those here on R-Sig-Phylo.
-Dave
-- Forwarded message -
From: Michelle Lawing
Date: Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 9:06 AM
Subject: Postdoc Position: Phylogenetic Climate Modeling & 3D Morphometrics
To:
Hi all, Russell, Nate,
I took an interest with some of the commentary here, so here's my two cents.
> I was surprised that AIC would vary this much in a dataset where the trait
> data, number of tips, and branching
> topology used to compute the model are more or less constant between trees.
I
Karla et al.,
There isn't, necessarily, a good alternative. If phylogenetic signal
is very poor, our ability to estimate rates is extremely hindered.
There's no rate of evolution in a white noise model -- values are
simply assigned independently of phylogeny.
One thought I had is that you might
Hi Elizabeth,
There's a lot of ways for trees to be wrong, and surely no
tree-checking or tree-fixing function can handle all possibilities.
Dating trees and simulating trees can be a messy business, so I used
to often hard-crash R with C++ errors all the time until I wrote
functions to try to
son, Peter Wagner, April Wright, David Wright, Laura Soul,
Rachel Warnock, & David Bapst
--
David W. Bapst, PhD
Assistant Instructional Professor
Geology & Geophysics
Texas A & M University
https://github.com/dwbapst/paleotree
[[alternative HTML
-serv.
Cheers,
-Dave Bapst
##
We are pleased to announce the 2019 Paleontological Society Short
Course, “Quantitative Methods in Phylogenetic Paleobiology,” organized
by David Bapst, Sandy Carlson, Laura Soul, Peter Wagner, Rachel
Warnock, April Wright & Davey Wr
Hi all,
I've been dealing with a tree with one very deep divergence and many
very shallow divergences recently, and I was curious if there was an R
plotting capability that allows for the depth axis of the tree to be
non-linear or logarithmic - helpful if there can be a time axis bar as
well, as
My biggest issue with this setup, as you give it, is that it isn't
clear how you'll make this into a test - is there some summary
statistic of the null morphospace you'll be generating many times, and
then comparing that distribution to the observed value of the
observed, real data? I would
Danielle,
Apologies for the late comment on this, but what do you mean by non-rooted?
Do you mean the tree is rooted, but has a three-way split with the outgroup
at the root node? You shouldn't do OU on a tree you can't assign a root to.
I'm also just a bit curious what gave you the sense that
Hi all,
I was interested if anyone was familiar with R code that can estimate an
extended majority consensus tree (referred to as an 'allcompat' tree by the
sumt command in MrBayes)? This is a fully bifurcating summary of a tree
posterior, where each clade is maximally resolved by the split that
_eig" "Cumul_br_stick"
> R> names(res.lingoes$values)
> [1] "Eigenvalues" "Corr_eig" "Rel_corr_eig" "Broken_stick"
> [5] "Cum_corr_eig" "Cum_br_stick"
> R> any(res.lingoes$values$Corr_eig < 0)
&g
Hi all,
Not exactly phylogenetic, but I've recently uncovered some odd behavior
with `pcoa` in `ape` and I was curious if anyone understood what was going
on.
Usually, if you don't have negative eigenvalues and aren't using a
correction, `pcoa` will return the raw eigenvalues. However, I've
Alyson-
Following off of what Liam said, one thing to consider is as most measures
of phylogenetic signal aren't relative to the units of the traits
considered, any transformation of the data should be about equally
interpretable. To take a spin with Liam's example, if , if the log-scale
trait
odel ranking
> may change depending on the underlying models too, I guess).
>
> Jake
>
>
> > On Jun 14, 2018, at 9:32 AM, David Bapst wrote:
> >
> > Simone, Marguerite, others,
> >
> > I'll also add that I think there's a great deal to be skeptica
ni8p58-9Xpxcc2aQgYVVI=a0SwA8yTo1qWJZLpuWR9cVHuO_cxYqknynO9BdyATbs=>
>
>
> On Jun 11, 2018, at 7:33 PM, Simone Blomberg
> wrote:
>
> This sounded wrong to me, as the OU process should be agnostic to the
> dataset: There are no restrictions inherent in the OU process that apply
>
it is clear that you can use branch length
> transformations with OU, so long as you use the (correct) Hansen formula,
> not the Butler-king formula, which does indeed require an ultrametric tree.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Simone.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 12 Jun 2018,
Just to follow off what Lucas said, but please note you cannot rescale
branches of a phylogeny using an OU model when the tree is
non-ultrametric (such as when it contains extinct, fossil taxa as
tips). Slater (2014, MEE) discusses this more in a brief correction to
Slater (2013).
I don't know if
ttp://idea.ucr.edu/>Educational Applications <http://idea.ucr.edu/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Editor in Chief, /Physiological and Biochemical Zoology
>>>> <http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/journals/journal/pbz.html>/
>>>>
>>>>
>>
have elsewhere in the R-phylo
universe.
-Dave
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:30 PM, Brian O'Meara <bome...@utk.edu> wrote:
> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 2:53 PM, David Bapst <dwba...@tamu.edu> wrote:
>>
>> Given that your tree appears to be non-ultrametric enough to cause
>&
out why
the tips seem to not quite be at the same distance from the root.
Cheers,
-Dave.
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 1:35 PM, David Bapst <dwba...@tamu.edu> wrote:
> Rafael,
>
> That error message is from paleotree's dateNodes function, which is
> called as part of OUwie's approa
Rafael,
That error message is from paleotree's dateNodes function, which is
called as part of OUwie's approach to getting node dates. I think I
see what Elliot is trying to get at, but this might be quicker:
node.depth.edgelength(tree)
That should tell us how far each node, including the tips,
Do you have any zero-length branches in your tree, Aja?
Cheers,
-Dave Bapst
On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 3:22 PM, Aja Carter wrote:
> I am using the ancThresh model in the phytools package for 172 taxa. For
> model we have the liabilities, parameters, MCMC and alpha values
Hi all,
I know R-devel is meant to be unstable, but I was curious if anyone
else has had issues with getting ape v4.1, installed as a binary from
CRAN, to work with R-devel recently on Windows (3.5.0 pre-release,
timestamp: 2017-10-19 r73560, specifically Windows 10, although I
don't think its
For a reason I ignore, it seems that a random seed is initialized
> when calling a function linked to Rcpp. Here is an example:
>
> R> rm(".Random.seed")
> R> library(RcppEigen)
> R> exists(".Random.seed")
> [1] FALSE
> R> o <- fastLm(1, 1)
> R
Emmanuel, all-
I noticed today that a workspace I was working with had a random
number seed set in it, but didn't remember setting one. Finally, I
discovered the culprit was ace. Here's a reproducible example,
demonstrating that a seed exists after running ace:
library(ape)
tree<-rtree(10)
ll for your advice.
>
> Cheers,
> Sérgio.
>
> - Mensagem original -
>> De: "David Bapst" <dwba...@gmail.com>
>> Para: "Sergio Ferreira Cardoso" <sergio.ferreira-card...@umontpellier.fr>
>> Cc: "Eliot Miller" <et...@corn
Hi Sergio,
Sorry for being late to the party, but maybe expandTaxonTree in
paleotree does what you're looking for? I wrote it for turning trees
of genera into trees of species, with the resulting generic polytomies
collapsed or not (in case we know that the genera is paraphyletic).
Cheers,
-Dave
Ross,
An interesting question. I understand it as that you want to test if
the trait is overdispersed relative to phylogeny, which still makes me
think that measures of 'phylogenetic signal' might be still be useful,
even though the typical interpretation is 'signal' as 'heritability'.
I would
That's really cool, Liam. Would it also be possible for one to do
multiple such error bars per node, for plotting ASRs for multiple
traits?
-Dave
On Mon, Feb 27, 2017 at 12:13 PM, Liam J. Revell wrote:
> Hi Kevin.
>
> This is not automatic - but it is indeed fairly easy to
A deep thought on this topic, from a mind run aground amidst grading papers.
While I am a big fan of using multiple trees, we should keep in mind
that phylogenetic uncertainty makes signal into a rather snaky
concept. By this, I mean that there could have only been one true
history (which may or
Manabu-
Can you give us a reproducible example? Is it as simple as plotting
any tree does it or is it only particular trees?
Cheers,
-Dave
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 7:53 AM, Manabu Sakamoto
wrote:
> Dear List,
>
> I'm getting fatal errors when plotting phylo objects,
Thanks, Emmanuel. That answers my questions.
Cheers,
-Dave
On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 4:03 AM, Emmanuel Paradis
<emmanuel.para...@ird.fr> wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Le 03/10/2016 à 17:25, David Bapst a écrit :
>>
>> Hi Emmanuel (and list!),
>>
>> These changes
Hi Emmanuel (and list!),
These changes are appreciated, and will make dealing with multiPhylo
objects much easier. I know I certainly have blocks of code where I
need to 'carry' the multiPhylo class tag through every other line; it
always been a bit of a chore. However, two questions from the
John,
I had to double-check this with someone who knew better first, but
they confirmed for me that the answer is that MrBayes doesn't infer a
Q matrix. By default, the Q matrix for Mk in MrBayes is always held
fixed so the rates of transition are always equal and fully
reversible, i.e. a simple
Hi all,
Just a short reminder, that abstract submission for GSA (and thus for
our session) closes on July 12th, which is less than a week away.
Cheers!
-Dave
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:25 AM, David Bapst <dwba...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> We are pleased to announce a
Brian-
Is your tree non-ultrametric because it contains extinct taxa from the
fossil record, or is it simply an undated tree of extant taxa?
To my knowledge, there isn't yet a satisfactory solution to the first
(no BISSE for paleo-phylogenies) but if the second then, it seems the
best route
Hello all,
We are pleased to announce a topical session that we believe is of
special interest to the R-Sig-Phylo list, scheduled for the 2016
annual Geological Society of America meeting held from September
25th-28th in Denver, Colorado, USA. Our oral topical session, “New
Approaches to
Darrin, list-
I'm sure there's people on this list with better answers, so I'll
throw in first with what might be the wrong answer (but feels right to
me), and say you more or less need to report all of them: like, show a
full histogram of the p-values. At least, as a reviewer, that is what
would
FYI, in case one wants to install the testing version of ape to
R-devel (in my case, also a Windows machine), I found I needed:
install.packages("ape",contriburl="http://ape-package.ird.fr/bin/windows/contrib/3.2;)
Emmanuel, I've tested the testing version with paleotree and a few
other projects
Lev,
This is easy, if the newick strings are structured the same so that
the resulting edge matrix and tip labels are identical. Here's a
worked example:
```
library(ape)
# with edge lengths
Hi Roger,
I'm not aware of any existing solution. Could you send around a small
example of the data format of an output sampled ancestor tree from
BEAST or MrBayes? Are they just typical Newick/NEXUS format with
ancestors indicated tipis with zero-length branches or something more
complicated?
Tristan,
It's alright. To be honest, I am (and should be) quite embarrassed
that I overlooked an ape function... I was a nice warm-up exercise,
nonetheless, and I can see how to extend it to handle dates for
non-ultrametric fossil trees, which is a case not covered by
compute.brtimes, and would
Hello Tristan,
Does the code below work for your purpose? I don't know of a function
off the top of my head that does this in a current package on CRAN
(and although I might have missed such, I try to keep myself aware of
time-scaling functions in R, given my interests). However, its not too
Hi Gustavo,
I'm paleotree's author and maintainer. Just to be clear that I
understand your problem, I believe you are saying that when you use
timeSliceTree, you are getting an error that the internal call to
dist.nodes is failing? Is that right?
The first thought I have is that maybe the
is the part of the code that renumbers the nodes which is thus
used in all cases (even if there are no node labels). I'll conduct some
tests later, but in the mean time if you see something strange, just
tell me.
I attach the new source file.
Best,
Emmanuel
Le 25/07/2015 18:54, David Bapst
Hello all,
Recently I noticed a complex function of mine that does some tree
transformations was randomly scrambling node.label elements.
In the course of doing so, I found this old email (below) from Rebecca
Best in 2012, which outlined an issue that occurred when a ladderized
tree had tips
Hi Solomon,
Comparatives methods are routinely applied to non-ultrametric trees,
contrary to the text you quoted. See the last chapter of that book.
The phylogeny-based analyses that do generally require ultrametric
trees are those that fit some form of a lineage diversification model,
because
Just to clarify for future users who stumble on Liam's solution for
Lilian, the second block of code attaches the new tips to
non-ultrametric trees at the same distance as the current tips at
maximum distance from the root.
If this is a time-scaled phylogeny and the tree's root depth is equal
to
Hi all,
I was plotting some trees with obscenely long taxon names (long story)
and found an odd plotting artifact that leaves white-space when
show.tip.labels=FALSE, as if the plot was trying make room for the
extraordinarily long tip labels, even though they wouldn't be plotted.
I'm using R
Hello all,
(I'm a troublemaker today.)
Sometimes, in ordered discrete data, there are states we know might
exist as intermediary between observed states but aren't observed
themselves. I suppose this is probably common for meristic data. At
least to me, it seems like it should be possible to
: liam.rev...@umb.edu
blog: http://blog.phytools.org
On 6/17/2015 1:46 PM, David Bapst wrote:
Hello all,
(I'm a troublemaker today.)
Sometimes, in ordered discrete data, there are states we know might
exist as intermediary between observed states but aren't observed
themselves. I suppose
://faculty.umb.edu/liam.revell/
email: liam.rev...@umb.edu
blog: http://blog.phytools.org
On 6/17/2015 3:06 PM, David Bapst wrote:
Liam,
Ah, I see, rerootingMethod(), unlike ace, will accept a matrix
representation of discrete trait values.
However, it doesn't appear that one can define a model matrix
,
Emmanuel
Le 12/06/2015 22:41, David Bapst a écrit :
Hi Klaus (and others),
Ah, I see! The real bug then appears to be in collapse.singles, as it
does not reorder the ID numbers in $edge. Here's a quick function to
return the root ID:
getRootID-function(tree){
uniqueNode-unique(tree$edge
that would be tough to find
otherwise.
Cheers,
Emmanuel
Le 12/06/2015 22:41, David Bapst a écrit :
Hi Klaus (and others),
Ah, I see! The real bug then appears to be in collapse.singles, as it
does not reorder the ID numbers in $edge. Here's a quick function to
return the root ID:
getRootID
Whoops, I meant a 'function in ape?'
-Dave
On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 10:26 AM, David Bapst dwba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brian,
I was already aware of the read.tree(write.tree()) fix, however I've
run into (corner?) cases where a particular sorting of edges or
whatever can lead to a loss of tip
(tree1, 131, 151)
plot(tree2) # now works for me
Cheers and have a nice weekend,
Klaus
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:53 PM, David Bapst dwba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
As those of you who directly manipulate the guts of phylo objects in
your code (or construct new phylo objects
Hello all,
As those of you who directly manipulate the guts of phylo objects in
your code (or construct new phylo objects whole cloth from
un-phylo-like data structures) have probably experienced, it is
sometimes easy to create $edge matrices that aren't accepted by ape
functions (I often use
Aaron,
While contemplating Nate's question, I wondered, doesn't hansen
currently support NA codings for missing variables for tip taxa?
Unfortunately the donotrun{} example for hansen() using geiger data
isn't currently functioning, so I couldn't test this.
-Dave Bapst
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at
Milton, Brian, etc,
Just wanted to add some background on Alroy's anc-desc change
analyses, and the recognition of these relationships in the fossil
record. This may be tangential; it isn't clear to me what sort of
dataset that Milton has. So, Brian said...
In Paleo, you can (well, arguably)
William,
Yes, the different PCM models make very different statements about
what is happening biologically in your data. Additionally, the three
Pagel parameters are not always easy to interpret biologically. Carl
Boettiger has some particularly lucid thoughts on Pagel's lambda:
Cecile, Peter, Joe and all-
As far as I understand, Peter's analysis involves paleontological data with
non-ultrametric trees, and based on my understanding of Slater (2014), the
Freckleton approach using PIC is invalid for that type of dataset, although
Fitzjohn's pruning algorithm might still
to
plot posterior probabilites from MrBayes in R!
Cheers,
-Dave
On Fri, Oct 3, 2014 at 10:29 AM, David Bapst dwba...@gmail.com wrote:
Just to clarify, off-list discussion with Graham reveals (after some
confusion on my part) that if the simple format option is used in sumt
in MrBayes
Hello all,
Recently, I wanted to display posterior probabilities on a 50%
compatibility tree from a MrBayes run, created with the 'sumt'
command. I looked around for ways to do this and found this email
thread from last year:
https://stat.ethz.ch/pipermail/r-sig-phylo/2013-June/002825.html
Department of Paleobiology
National Museum of Natural History
The Smithsonian Institution [NHB, MRC 121]
P.O. Box 37012
(202) 633-1316
slat...@si.edu
www.fourdimensionalbiology.com
On Oct 3, 2014, at 10:42 AM, David Bapst dwba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello all,
Recently, I wanted to display
Julien-
Does mvSHIFT account for the OU rescaling issue on non-ultrametric
trees that Graham mentions? If so, how?
Cheers,
-Dave
On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 5:26 PM, Julien Clavel julien.cla...@hotmail.fr wrote:
Hi Jon,
Take a look at the mvSHIFT function in mvMORPH. This is typically what you
Hi John,
A fully reproducible example of the error you have encountered would be this:
trees.pool-rmtree(N=10,n=100)
trees.pool[[1]]-NULL
Which returns the same error; the reason for this is that 'multiphylo'
is an S3 class so ape has a specific function that replaces the
generic replacement
At the risk of inundating you with options, Henry, there is also
expandTaxonTree in the package paleotree (on CRAN) which is similar to the
above, but also lets you collapse higher taxa you list as paraphyletic,
which can be useful if the taxonomic work of your group has never been
concerned with
this ambiguity, so:
(A,B,C):0;
is a (non-binary) rooted tree (note that both trees are graphically
identical). Ape considers the first tree as unrooted because it is the kind
of trees produced by many functions such as nj, bionj, etc.
Best,
Emmanuel
Le 16/01/2014 17:32, David Bapst
J. Revell, Assistant Professor of Biology
University of Massachusetts Boston
web: http://faculty.umb.edu/liam.revell/
email: liam.rev...@umb.edu
blog: http://blog.phytools.org
On 1/15/2014 3:34 PM, David Bapst wrote:
Hi Emmanuel and the rest of the list,
In some code, I use the ape
Hi Emmanuel and the rest of the list,
In some code, I use the ape function is.binary.tree to test if a
phylogeny is fully dichotomous. However, some recent analyses have
made me wonder if this wasn't the right choice. I'm not sure if the
following is a bug report me or me not understand the
Hi Jurriaan-
I've been thinking about this after your email and my sense is that
such a simulation would be very difficult. Just dropping onto the tree
branching events on the extant tree that only produced one living
daughter might not be too difficult under a homogenous birth-death
model.
Tristan-
I found this to be the most important how-to reference, but I am a windows user.
http://robjhyndman.com/hyndsight/building-r-packages-for-windows/
For distributing on CRAN, making help files and examples is the most
critical step. package.skeleton() is helpful in setting up the
Hi John,
I'm not familiar with any such function either. However, a handy trick
for doing this sort of thing is changing the branch lengths of
descendant nodes to zero and using the ape function di2multi to
collapse those edges, creating a polytomy.
Now, it isn't clear to me from your email
/
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/paleotree/index.html
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list - R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https
studies, using
character evolution as a focal point.
Sincerely,
Lee Hsiang Liow Thomas F. Hansen
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/paleotree/index.html
will be assigned time slots of 15
minutes and selected based on relevance for the symposium.
Sincerely,
Lee Hsiang Liow Thomas F. Hansen
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 2:04 PM, Jeremy Yoder jbyo...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I'm working on some analyses that require comparison of tree structures,
and I've bumped into the problem David Bapst posted about back in March:
http://www.mail-archive.com/r-sig-phylo@r-project.org/msg01840.html
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL
] 0.001813503
$Trait1$aic
[1] 534.8593
$Trait1$aicc
[1] 535.1042
$Trait1$k
[1] 3
On Sun, Nov 4, 2012 at 2:01 PM, David Bapst dwba...@uchicago.edu wrote:
Nicolas,
Not certain how you are time-scaling your tree, but I often get warnings
of
singularity from various comparative analysis functions
the College of Staten Island as one of Americas
Best-Bang-for-the-Buck Colleges
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University
Tom
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst
size as the orginal (e.g.
with TreeSim functions) to get the null distribution of gamma values. Is that
feasible?
thanks,
Pas
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/paleotree/index.html
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R
:
Error in chol.default(V) :
the leading minor of order 10 is not positive definite
Any tree I generate with rtree or rcoal seems to generate this or a similar
error with compar.ou, so it doesn't seem to be an issue with me using a
non-ultrametric tree. Any ideas?
Thanks, all!
-Dave
--
David
]]
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages
degradation example.
So, what do people think? How should we test for correlation when
non-evolving quasi-traits are involved? I'm very interested to hear
people's thoughts on this matter.
-Dave Bapst, UChicago
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL
deleted]]
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst
://morganlangille.com
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL
Hello all,
Just wanted to send a final reminder that abstracts for our session at GSA
2011 is due today, June 26th. See my previous email below for more details.
Thanks,
-Dave Bapst and Emily King, UChicago
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 11:39 AM, David Bapst dwba...@uchicago.edu wrote:
Hello all
,
Liutauras
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst
questions.
-Dave Bapst, UChicago
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo
-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
[[alternative HTML version deleted
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
[[alternative
haven't updated to 2.7 since I use
read.nexus() quite a bit; let me know if it is reproducible in that version.
-Dave
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
[[alternative HTML version deleted
looking for.
Thanks,
-Dave
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst/
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r
one draw if the pure
birth model fits better than the birth-death model? That the
extinction rate is negligible?
-Dave
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical Sciences
University of Chicago
5734 S. Ellis
Chicago, IL 60637
http://home.uchicago.edu/~dwbapst
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
[[alternative HTML version deleted]]
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical
for your time,
Cheers,
Alastair
David Bapst wrote:
Alistair-
How many multifurcations are there, with how many branches each? If
the number of potentially resulting trees is too high, it may not be
possible to store all the possible trees in memory.
If your tree is small, you might try
Private Bag, Rondebosch 7700, South Africa
or
PO Box 115, Loxton 6985, South Africa
Cell: 082 491-7275
___
R-sig-phylo mailing list
R-sig-phylo@r-project.org
https://stat.ethz.ch/mailman/listinfo/r-sig-phylo
--
David Bapst
Dept of Geophysical
1 - 100 of 113 matches
Mail list logo