Re: do you need www.kde.org write access?

Hi David, On zaterdag 10 maart 2018 09:15:17 CET David Faure wrote: > On mercredi 7 mars 2018 13:43:44 CET Sandro Knauß wrote: > > > Earlier versions used to have an API for programmatic access. Not sure > > > about now, but I assume so. > > > We also have a library for that: kde/pim/kblog. That

do you need www.kde.org write access?

Hi all, We have been working on a modernized website and backend for www.kde.org. The new site will do away with the old PHP custom CMS and will run wordpress instead. This means that access control will be different, so we have to make sure that we do not interrupt critical workflows by

Re: Plasma 5.7.4 is out

On Friday, September 9, 2016 11:58:25 PM UTC Andreas Müller wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 6:46 PM, David Edmundson > > wrote: > > https://www.kde.org/announcements/plasma-5.7.4.php > > > > Regards > > > > David > > I did not find anything in announcement: What

Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

On Monday, July 4, 2016 1:59:41 PM CEST David Edmundson wrote: > I meant "if we accidentally released libkscreen 5.6" as "libkscreen 5.7 > beta", please tell me. > > We didn't. Ok, good. Thanks for checking! -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org

Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

On Monday, July 4, 2016 1:29:55 PM CEST David Edmundson wrote: > ... and if not, I need to know, because that means that > > - nobody tested the changes in libkscreen's master in the beta > - the test reports that I did get from the beta are meaningless (which could > be a good thing ;)) > >

Re: Plasma 5.7.0 tars

On Thursday, June 30, 2016 11:06:46 PM CEST Harald Sitter wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 4:45 PM, David Edmundson > > wrote: > > *sigh* seems so. Yet plasma-workspace is from the right branch and it's > > done by an automated script(!) > > Haven't we fixed that for

Re: More Plasma bug fix releases

On Wednesday, October 28, 2015 09:11:13 PM Sandro Knauß wrote: > I see it more as meta informations about patches, to be able to use > it as argument for pushing things more easily futher down to the user. The git log contains this metainformation in the form of the BUG field. -- sebas

Re: More Plasma bug fix releases

On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 06:05:48 PM Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:01:47 PM Luca Beltrame wrote: > > Il Tue, 27 Oct 2015 14:18:01 -0700, Eric Hameleers ha scritto: > > > No, of course not. I consider the git branch to be in eternal flux. The > > > git HEAD may

Re: More Plasma bug fix releases

On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:58:34 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: > El Tuesday 27 October 2015, a les 14:39:15, Eric Hameleers va escriure: > > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015, Albert Astals Cid wrote: > > > El Tuesday 27 October 2015, a les 14:18:01, Eric Hameleers va escriure: > > > > > > Yes, of course

Re: More Plasma bug fix releases

On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 01:51:55 PM Martin Graesslin wrote: > I was thinking about the problem of how we can get bug fixes quicker to our > user. With a three month release cycle a one-month bug fix cycle sounds too > long to me. > > So I thought we should make bug fix releases faster and

Re: More Plasma bug fix releases

On Tuesday, October 27, 2015 06:25:42 AM Eric Hameleers wrote: > I like the idea of getting more visibility for bugfixes that will give > the enduser a better Plasma experience. Ideal for me would be a patch > tracker (not the same as a bug tracker) where intermediate patches are > made

Re: oxygen-icons & plasma-workspace-wallpapers moved to git

On Wednesday, September 16, 2015 11:52:02 Jonathan Riddell wrote: > I think the default wallpaper should be kept alongside plasma-workspace, > less chance of not having it installed by accident +1. We need at least one default wallpaper working, the rest is optional. -- sebas Sebastian

Re: kio-extras into applications

On Thursday, July 02, 2015 12:38:24 David Faure wrote: On Thursday 02 July 2015 13:07:45 Alexander Potashev wrote: 2015-07-02 12:54 GMT+03:00 Sebastian Kügler se...@kde.org: If for example I want to use fish:// for my desktop folderview, I'd have to install something from applications

Re: kio-extras into applications

On Thursday, July 02, 2015 11:34:56 David Faure wrote: On Tuesday 30 June 2015 11:03:21 Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:00:31 Jonathan Riddell wrote: Plasma 5.3.2 is out and in August the 3 releases are closely aligned so it's a chance to move things about while

Re: kio-extras into applications

On Tuesday, June 30, 2015 12:00:31 Jonathan Riddell wrote: Plasma 5.3.2 is out and in August the 3 releases are closely aligned so it's a chance to move things about while minimising the overlap. kio-extras has been suggested to be moved to Applications instead of Plasma as it's needed by

Re: Future frameworks releases

the amount of negative reactions (and the fact that they come from /all the right people/ and forget about your proposal. Trust the elders. Cheers, -- sebas Sebastian Kügler|http://vizZzion.org| http://kde.org ___ release-team mailing

Re: Future frameworks releases

On Tuesday, June 16, 2015 11:45:06 Christian Mollekopf wrote: On Thu, Jun 11, 2015, at 08:56 PM, Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Tuesday, June 09, 2015 10:08:06 Christian Mollekopf wrote: I'm sorry for the friction this causes right now, but in the long run I really don't see how this makes

Re: Future frameworks releases

of frameworks is a /really bad idea/. Cheers, -- sebas Sebastian Kügler|http://vizZzion.org| http://kde.org ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: This is not working [for me]

On Monday, March 02, 2015 20:00:14 Alex Merry wrote: But we need to make this work better for my sanity for 15.08 otherwise I'm out. Does anyone have any magic solution? I wonder if part of the problem is a lack of clear definition as to who compromises the release team. For example,

Re: Plasma 5.1 new tars coming..

On Tuesday, October 14, 2014 11:22:39 Jonathan Riddell wrote: I just noticed at the last minute that the Plasma tars didn't have their internal version numbers updated to 5.1.0, the script I wrote to make that easier must have only updated master and not branch. I'm going to reroll the tars

Re: Plasma 5.1.0

On Thursday, October 09, 2014 21:36:58 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dijous, 9 d'octubre de 2014, a les 14:26:48, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: Plasma 5.1.0 tars up now at http://starsky.19inch.net/~jr/tmp/plasma-5.1.0/ and coming soon to depot sha256 sums at

Re: feature exception for kapptemplate Frameworks template

On Friday, July 25, 2014 01:53:50 Aleix Pol wrote: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 10:39 PM, Albert Astals Cid aa...@kde.org wrote: El Dijous, 24 de juliol de 2014, a les 11:53:15, Jonathan Riddell va escriure: I'd like to ask for a feature exception for 4.14 for adding a Frameworks template to

Re: Plasma 5.0.0!

On Friday, July 11, 2014 18:20:58 Wulf C. Krueger wrote: On Fr 11 Jul 2014 18:00:40 CEST, Jonathan Riddell wrote: Another try for baloo, I made an empty tar somehow Thanks for your efforts! I think it might be a good idea, though, to verify tarballs (and ideally their contents, including

Re: KF5 beta3

Hi Eric, On Tuesday, June 03, 2014 12:49:01 Eric Hameleers wrote: I did however have to write a couple of patches to get everything compiling. Well, except kdepimlibs (frameworks branch) which I can not get to compile no matter what I try. The four patches I created are attached for those

Plasma Next release schedule changes

Hey all, We had to delay the Plasma Next release, because Frameworks will only be released July 1st. Jonathan has adjusted the online schedule, the short version of the relevant part is: * Beta 2: Thu June 5 tagging, Tue 8 June release * Release Candidate: Thu 3 July tagging, Tue 8 July

Re: Fwd: KDE Frameworks Release Cycle

On Sunday, April 27, 2014 15:55:07 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Diumenge, 27 d'abril de 2014, a les 15:15:32, David Faure va escriure: FYI. Interesting fact here that original the mail was just sent to k-f-d and k-c-d. I am seeing similar patterns in the plasma land, where they went their

wiki page with Plasma Next Alpha1 packages

Hi packagers, If you're preparing packages for the upcoming Plasma Next Alpha 1, please add a pointer to this page: http://community.kde.org/Plasma/Next/UnstablePackages Thanks, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9

Re: Plasma Next alpha release engineering bits

On Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:49:21 Jos Poortvliet wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2014 13:10:12 Sebastian Kügler wrote: As we're planning to release the first alpha of Plasma Next next week, I'd like to go over some details that need discussing. - promo preparations You want the same

Re: Plasma Next alpha release engineering bits

On Thursday, March 06, 2014 15:12:32 Jos Poortvliet wrote: On Thursday 06 March 2014 11:32:03 Sebastian Kügler wrote: On Thursday, March 06, 2014 10:49:21 Jos Poortvliet wrote: On Wednesday 05 March 2014 13:10:12 Sebastian Kügler wrote: You want the same as for the Frameworks

Plasma Next alpha release engineering bits

Hi, As we're planning to release the first alpha of Plasma Next next week, I'd like to go over some details that need discussing. - promo preparations - tagging / tarballing: can happen anytime on Thursday next week - smoke-testing of packages - rolling out packages on Monday, or sooner

Re: change of program icon

Hey, On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 00:55:37 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dilluns, 3 de març de 2014, a les 22:47:06, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: On Monday, March 03, 2014 19:27:29 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dilluns, 3 de març de 2014, a les 13:10:30, Sebastian Kügler va escriure

Re: change of program icon

On Tuesday, March 04, 2014 11:13:29 Sebastian Kügler wrote: Probably wrong wording on my side again. The Freezes are what creates the blocks and the r-t gives exceptions on these freezes. This is how we have always worked as far as i can remember. I was confused, I didn't know Wolfgang

Re: change of program icon

Hi Wolfgang, On Monday, March 03, 2014 01:27:42 Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote: Am Montag, 17. Februar 2014, 23:14:56 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: Wednesday, February 26, 2014 has * KDE SC 4.13 Artwork and Bindings Freeze would it be too late to give the game Kajongg a new program icon? The

Re: change of program icon

Hi, On Monday, March 03, 2014 19:27:29 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dilluns, 3 de març de 2014, a les 13:10:30, Sebastian Kügler va escriure: On Monday, March 03, 2014 01:27:42 Wolfgang Rohdewald wrote: Am Montag, 17. Februar 2014, 23:14:56 schrieb Albert Astals Cid: would it be too

Plasma Next Release Plans

Hi all, The Plasma team has settled on a release schedule for the first stable released based on Qt5 and KF5. You can find the schedule here: http://techbase.kde.org/Schedules/Plasma/2014.6_Release_Schedule For those too lazy to click: We'll release .0 on 17th June, two alphas, a beta and an

Re: Plasma Next Release Plans

On Wednesday, February 19, 2014 21:01:52 Martin Graesslin wrote: On Wednesday 19 February 2014 20:42:15 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dimecres, 19 de febrer de 2014, a les 15:01:50, Sebastian Kügler va The Plasma team has settled on a release schedule for the first stable released based

Re: KDE's opinion on SC 4.13 for Kubuntu 14.04

On Sunday, January 19, 2014 23:28:46 Albert Astals Cid wrote: My question now is. Do you think that 4.13 (rc) will be reliable enough for a release product and do you want us to try push for 4.13 or would you prefer us to release with 4.12? Personally, a RC is not for production, since

Re: Jumped the gun on 4.11.1

Hi, On Monday, September 02, 2013 10:13:27 sfal...@gmail.com wrote: Hey guys, sorry about this, but we did accidentally let 4.11.1 out into the wild ahead of release announcement. Somebody brought this to our attention, and we've depublished our repo on openSUSE OBS, and wiped the

Re: Release Cycle

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 08:07:22 Jos Poortvliet wrote: What you just did means that KDE SC 4.12 will in fact be a 5 month release cycle. Earlier there was talk about outlining the future releases. That blog/news item is probably going to have to take the new 5 month cycle into

Re: Release Cycle

On Thursday, August 22, 2013 15:38:20 Sebastian Kügler wrote: KDE Workspaces 2.0 preview 1st Q1/2013 KDE Workspaces 2.0 release 2nd Q2/2013 It's hard to write, let me try again: KDE Workspaces 2.0 preview Q1/2014 KDE Workspaces 2.0 release Q2/2014 This sounds more like it. :) -- sebas http

Re: Shift releases?

On Thursday, July 18, 2013 01:56:41 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Because of akademy and other stuff we shifted RC1 for 6 days, do you think it makes sense to shift all the releases one week or just keep the current release schedule? I think I prefer keeping the current one, but I'm open to

Re: Disable by default KRandR in 4.11

On Thursday, July 04, 2013 01:06:27 Àlex Fiestas wrote: I want to propose to disable by default KRandR from kde-workspace release for 4.11. While I'm considered the maintainer of KRandR truth is I have never been it, I just made it work around 4.7 times but it is still full of bugs and

Re: Disable by default KRandR in 4.11

On Thursday, July 04, 2013 17:05:59 Martin Graesslin wrote: On Thursday 04 July 2013 16:34:18 Àlex Fiestas wrote: I think this should go into SC, not just extragear. Very much so since it would replace krandr there. The functionality of plugging in an extra screen or unplugging it

Re: Release Strategy Proposal

On Tuesday, May 07, 2013 21:34:47 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dimarts, 7 de maig de 2013, a les 09:25:13, Aaron J. Seigo va escriure: On Tuesday, May 7, 2013 00:51:56 Albert Astals Cid wrote: To be honest from a release team point of view I feel here that the plasma guys are forcing a

Re: Release Strategy Proposal

Hi Frank, On Friday, April 26, 2013 17:16:06 Frank Reininghaus wrote: 2013/4/26 Sebastian Kügler: On Friday, April 26, 2013 15:37:09 Frank Reininghaus wrote: 2013/4/26 Sebastian Kügler: tldr Let's make 4.11 the last feature release for platform and workspace in the 4 series, make

Release Strategy Proposal

Hi, tldr Let's make 4.11 the last feature release for platform and workspace in the 4 series, make 4.11 a long term maintainance release. /tldr I would like to propose the following for our release planning in the next year: - Make 4.11 Platform and Workspaces a long-term maintainance release

Re: Release Strategy Proposal

On Friday, April 26, 2013 15:37:09 Frank Reininghaus wrote: 2013/4/26 Sebastian Kügler: tldr Let's make 4.11 the last feature release for platform and workspace in the 4 series, make 4.11 a long term maintainance release. /tldr What exactly is part of this proposal

Re: Release Strategy Proposal

On Friday, April 26, 2013 08:44:35 Rex Dieter wrote: With my packager-hat on, this raises some concern about future possible version assumptions being broken (ie, packaging that assumes constant versioning across all kde core packages). That's something that will have to be dealt with

Re: Release Strategy Proposal

Hi Alex, On Friday, April 26, 2013 18:35:41 Alexander Neundorf wrote: On Friday 26 April 2013, Sebastian Kügler wrote: tldr Let's make 4.11 the last feature release for platform and workspace in the 4 series, make 4.11 a long term maintainance release. /tldr IMO this is not about

Re: Release Strategy Proposal

Hey, On Friday, April 26, 2013 23:28:34 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Of course, this being a proposal, its main purpose is to sollicit feedback, but I'd also move towards a solution, as far as this describes common ground among all stakeholders. What do you think? I'm all for it if

Re: stepping back from release duties

On Tuesday, February 19, 2013 20:26:26 Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dimarts, 19 de febrer de 2013, a les 15:38:49, Torgny Nyblom va escriure: On Tuesday 19 February 2013 13.19.37 Sebastian Kügler wrote: [...] I decided to take a step back [...] I just wanted to say Thank you

stepping back from release duties

Hi all, I've been doing releases of KDE (SC) for a long time now (way beyond 100 individual releases). I think it's time others jumped in here as well. As that's always hard when the old grumpy guy still sits there, I decided to take a step back and have others jump in here. That means that

Re: [kde-promo] 4.10 announcement ready for translation

On Monday, February 04, 2013 20:13:10 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Unfortunately you forgot to tell the translators. Ah, I was assuming someone would take it from here. Can someone still do that, after the past days of webmonkeying, I don't quite feel like managing translations. -- sebas

www/sites/www

SVN commit 1337829 by sebas: Release 4.10.0 CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org M +0 -3 announcements/4.10/applications-it.php M +0 -3 announcements/4.10/applications.php M +0 -4 announcements/4.10/index-it.php M +0 -4 announcements/4.10/index.php M +0 -3

4.10 announcement ready for translation

Hi, The announcement can now be translated, it's in the usual place in the www svn repo. Thanks everybody for the work so far! Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 ___ release-team mailing list

Re: Nepomuk - Changing the Resource class behaviour

On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 09:32:56 Allen Winter wrote: : remove the API in 4.11 will that work? No, as far as I can see, it's kdelibs and we can't remove API there. Deprecate it would be. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9

Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk - Changing the Resource class behaviour

On Tuesday, January 22, 2013 22:15:28 Vishesh Handa wrote: This change only affects nepomuk-core. If there are no problems, I will do the following - * Implement these changes in master * leave 4.10.0 alone. * Implement these changes in KDE/4.10 in time for 4.10.1 By changes, I mean

Re: KDE SC 4.11 Release Schedule

On Tuesday, January 15, 2013 23:27:53 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I'd like to propose some changes for 4.11, i'd like everyone to comment 1) Drop Betas to 1 It doesn't seem to me that having extra betas gives us much more quality, so my suggestion is to drop Beta 2 and move Beta 1 to

KDE Ships Second Release Candidate of Plasma Workspaces, Applications and Platform 4.10

A little belated, but here it is: KDE Ships Second Release Candidate of Plasma Workspaces, Applications and Platform 4.10 (4.10 RC2): * http://kde.org/announcements/announce-4.10-rc2.php -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9

Re: Fwd: www/sites/www

On Friday, January 04, 2013 21:38:51 Torgny Nyblom wrote: On Friday 04 January 2013 21.24.56 Torgny Nyblom wrote: On Friday 04 January 2013 17.27.50 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Any taker for the remaining tasks? Someone with more knowledge than me needs to do kde-annou...@kde.org, kde-

Re: Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

On Sunday, December 30, 2012 02:41:43 Scott Kitterman wrote: Assuming 4.10.1 and 4.10.2 slip similarly, that would result in the next Kubuntu release having 4.10.1 instead of 4.10.2. We might also have to make some adjustments to our internal testing milestone schedule. 4.10.2 would come

Another RC?, was: Re: Akonadi-Nepomuk Feeder Improvements

On Friday, December 28, 2012 21:54:17 Andreas K. Huettel wrote: Seriously. I know I'm probably just putting my foot in my mouth once more here, but: What are betas and rc's for, if not for stabilizing code and progressing to smaller and smaller non-intrusive changes? If you decide do kick

Re: Exception for Dolphin - KFileMetadataWidget

Hi Vishesh, On Saturday, December 22, 2012 15:26:10 Vishesh Handa wrote: On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:07 PM, Frank Reininghaus frank7...@googlemail.com wrote: If many people thought that the benefits of the new widget outweigh the risks, I would say let's merge it - I don't want to be blamed by

Re: Exception for Dolphin - KFileMetadataWidget

On Friday, December 21, 2012 16:27:17 Vishesh Handa wrote: So, may I merge my patch into kde-baseapps 4.10? It will get tested more thoroughly in RC2. I'm very uneasy with merging something this big and intrusive into 4.10 at this point. I also don't see why it has to go into 4.10, sure, it's

www/sites/www

SVN commit 1327414 by sebas: Release 4.9.4 CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org A announcements/announce-4.9.4.php announcements/announce-4.9.3.php#1327262 M +6 -0 announcements/index.php M +6 -6 index.php --- trunk/www/sites/www/announcements/index.php

www/sites/www

SVN commit 1327265 by sebas: Release 4.10 Beta2 CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org M +2 -2 index.php M +1 -1 info/releases.php --- trunk/www/sites/www/index.php #1327264:1327265 @@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ h2a name=announcementsLatest Announcements/a/h2 -pba

www/sites/www

SVN commit 1325823 by sebas: Release 4.10 Beta1 CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org M +5 -5 announcements/announce-4.10-beta1.php M +4 -0 index.php M +3 -3 info/releases.php --- trunk/www/sites/www/announcements/announce-4.10-beta1.php #1325822:1325823 @@ -12,7 +12,7 @@

Re: kdegraphicslibs (Was: libkdcraw api compatibility?)

On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 14:25:22 Allen Winter wrote: On Wednesday 21 November 2012 07:33:28 PM Albert Astals Cid wrote: El Dimecres, 21 de novembre de 2012, a les 11:38:09, Allen Winter va escriure: Sounds like we need a new module for graphics libraries. Along the lines of

Re: kdegraphicslibs (Was: libkdcraw api compatibility?)

On Wednesday, November 21, 2012 21:01:10 Albert Astals Cid wrote: One question to consider is wether this split should be done before Frameworks5, or as part of it. I think the Frameworks5 approach (so putting kdcraw, libkipi into separate packages and ship them as separate frameworks.

Re: Binary packages section of info/release.php pages

On Friday, November 09, 2012 00:27:18 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I was looking today at http://www.kde.org/info/4.9.3.php#binary and see there's only the Kubuntu information there when i know a few more distros have released 4.9.3 packages. Do we still need that? It looks a bit sad how it

Re: Request for adding new plugin for Dolphin

On Monday, November 05, 2012 21:50:01 Albert Astals Cid wrote: What do others say? No objection from me, neither, asuming the code is properly reviewed of course. Of course you still have to go trhough the review process (i.e. kdereview, etc). -- sebas http://www.kde.org |

www/sites/www

SVN commit 1324281 by sebas: release 4.9.3 CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org M +1 -1 announcements/announce-4.9.3.php M +7 -1 announcements/index.php M +1 -1 download/index.php M +6 -0 index.php M +2 -1 info/releases.php ---

Re: polkit-kde-kcmmodules editing /usr

On Thursday, October 25, 2012 14:38:01 Robby Workman wrote: On Thu, 25 Oct 2012, Kevin Kofler wrote: On Thursday 25 October 2012 at 09:47:08, Andrea Scarpino wrote: I cannot help here as we don't provide it in our repos. We (Fedora) neither. But on Arch Linux we have the same kind

Re: Feature Freeze and Review Board

On Wednesday, October 24, 2012 14:10:43 Albert Astals Cid wrote: So personally i'd like that you guys still add the stuff to the feature plan. And when we are at it: could we change trunk to whatever is better fitting? Can we just be smart people and accept that trunk is just

www/sites/www

SVN commit 1318785 by sebas: release 4.9.2 :) CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org M +6 -0 announcements/index.php M +1 -1 contact/about_kde-et.inc M +1 -1 contact/about_kde.inc M +1 -1 contact/about_kde_ru.inc M +1 -1 contact/about_kde_uk.inc M +2 -2

Re: 4.9.2 announcement?

On Monday, October 01, 2012 08:58:54 Torgny Nyblom wrote: As the public release comes closer I was wondering if anyone has written the announcement? It's on my plate for tomorrow. Announcements for dot-releases are usually done on release day. -- sebas http://www.kde.org |

Re: Regression causing Freeze in KWin 4.9.1

On Wednesday, September 05, 2012 16:07:30 Allen Winter wrote: Hot fixes should be sent to kde-packagers as a patch, or even better as a commit number. Example: Dear packagers, we found a bad bug in kde-foo that causes the following terrible things to happen. Please apply commit abc123 to

4.9.1 is out

Hey all, Congratulations and thanks for all your work to 4.9.1, which is now out in the wild. Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org

Re: Killing announcements/changelogs/changelog*.php

On Wednesday, August 15, 2012 12:44:09 Albert Astals Cid wrote: What do you guys think? With Albert. What he says. +1. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org

Re: KDE 4.8.5 tarballs available

On Sunday, August 05, 2012 23:09:17 Dirk Mueller wrote: I think we're ready to go. will enable syncing now, we can announce tomorrow morning. Announcement is out, thanks everybody! -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9

Re: Re: Release Script (KF5)

On Thursday, July 12, 2012 20:00:27 Michael Jansen wrote: Do you really think forcing an update of unchanged modules for our convenience will help those of us trying to use plasma for mobile devices? That's the work of the distributor for those mobile devices. Exactly as i

Re: Release Script (KF5)

Hi, On Wednesday, July 18, 2012 13:25:55 i...@michael-jansen.biz wrote: This will hurt the plasma mobile effort. FWIW, that assumption is wrong: Having version numbers be in line with each other makes our work easier, because we can just check if all packages are at least at

Re: Re: Changes to the kde-cvs-announce mailing list

On Sunday, July 15, 2012 22:20:13 David Faure wrote: Sysadmins are meta-moderators anyway (e.g. I can approve a mail on any mailing-list). So you have time left for emergency moderation? ;) /rhetorical question -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9

4.9 RC2 is out

Thanks to Albert and Torgny, 4.9 RC2 is out. Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 ___ release-team mailing list release-team@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/release-team

Re: Re: KDE 4.8.5 planning

Hey, On Saturday, July 07, 2012 13:34:07 Michael Jansen wrote: Also, *before* you start doing partial releases, please present an exact definition of the dependencies *between versions*. As i see that you are on the release-team list. May i ask why you voice your objections

Re: Re: KDE 4.8.5 planning

On Thursday, July 05, 2012 19:51:41 Michael Jansen wrote: Will that be a normal release (i.e. full KDE SC) or just kdelibs? This might be a nice time to try only releasing the packages that have changes. Please dont change that within stable series. I fully agree with that.

Re: Re: KDE 4.8.5 planning

On Thursday, July 05, 2012 18:07:47 Allen Winter wrote: On Thursday, July 05, 2012 01:00:11 PM Dirk Mueller wrote: I guess with all the kdelibs mess we should redo another 4.8.5 release. Does anyone have suggestions for a release plan? I would like to do tagging either tomorrow morning

Re: Release-team bof

On Thursday, June 28, 2012 18:27:29 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Anyone is attending Akademy? Do you guys think it makes sense to schedule a bof for the release-team? Definitely, I'll be in. -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9

Re: Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

On Monday, June 18, 2012 00:26:13 Albert Astals Cid wrote: * Need more people to do the tarball packaging/releasing (since if you propose to release that often you can't expect the same person to be doing packages almost weekly or byweekly given the release dates won't probably align)

Proposed adjustments to our release cycles

Hi all, During our sprint in Pineda de Mar, we sat down and thought about how our release cycles relate to the structures in our software, we came up with the following proposal we'd like you to consider and provide feedback about. Starting with KDE Frameworks 5, we will release Frameworks,

Re: Nepomuk crashes in 4.8.4 fixed in KDE/4.8.x branch

On Thursday, June 14, 2012 01:31:18 Albert Astals Cid wrote: Vishesh fixed the KDE/4.8.x branch of kdelibs. Can you guys verify it also fixes the issues for you? If so, what's the next step? Release an early 4.8.5? Repackage 4.8.4 kdelibs? Ideas? 4.8.5 from my POV. We can do a 4.8.6

www/sites/www

SVN commit 1300408 by sebas: Release 4.9 Beta2 \o/ CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org M +4 -4 announcements/announce-4.9-beta2.php M +6 -0 announcements/index.php M +6 -6 index.php --- trunk/www/sites/www/announcements/announce-4.9-beta2.php #1300407:1300408 @@ -9,7 +9,7

Re: Re: ALERT: KDElibs (at least) 4.8.4 is actually 4.8.80+

On Sunday, June 10, 2012 01:22:03 Kevin Kofler wrote: On Sunday 10 June 2012, Nicolás Alvarez wrote: Why not start now and make the next kdelibs 4.8.5? Releasing a kdelibs 4.9 will just add to the confusion of how kdelibs development is working. Because having a kdelibs version different

Re: Re: ALERT: KDElibs (at least) 4.8.4 is actually 4.8.80+

On Monday, June 11, 2012 16:25:17 Scott Kitterman wrote: Currently my About KDE says: Platform Version 4.8.3 (4.8.3) Once kdelibs versioning is desynchronized from the rest of the platform, what version is it? At least application-version and underlying-platform-version might (or might

Re: Re: ALERT: KDElibs (at least) 4.8.4 is actually 4.8.80+

On Sunday, June 10, 2012 20:17:56 Wulf C. Krueger wrote: On 10.06.2012 15:27, Albert Astals Cid wrote: - - Before announcing the tarballs, build the whole thing at least once. We do that, that's why we have a week before the release where packagers get access to pre-release tarballs.

[kdelibs/KDE/4.8] kio/kio: Fix build for Qt 4.8

Git commit c1f6c3980d92c2109f3f2ab3bd1fada31a0e4ecd by Sebastian Kügler. Committed on 06/06/2012 at 16:02. Pushed by sebas into branch 'KDE/4.8'. Fix build for Qt 4.8 Patch by Annma CCMAIL:release-team@kde.org M +16 -4kio/kio/tcpslavebase.cpp http://commits.kde.org/kdelibs

Re: Why are 4.8.80 packages already out in the wild?

On Monday, June 04, 2012 01:26:01 Kevin Kofler wrote: On Monday 04 June 2012, Albert Astals Cid wrote: It's not about hurting or not (that it does, see how Martin got confused and probably lost time wondering how something like that could be happening). Oh, and what Martin actually got

Re: Calling off Beta1

On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 19:55:02 Albert Astals Cid wrote: the release dude does the releases. Correction: The release *team* does the releases Now that is clear, can we work as a team here, and discuss problems instead of making such decisions unilaterally? -- sebas http://www.kde.org |

#kde-release-team

Hey, In order to improve communication among release team members, we've created #kde-release-team on Freenode's IRC network. If you're involved, please join. Cheers, -- sebas http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9 ___

Re: Calling off Beta1

On Tuesday, May 29, 2012 23:53:50 Albert Astals Cid wrote: I'm sorry for being naïve and expecting people would care about having a proper release. It won't happen again. Noe this It won't happen again doesn't mean I'm walking off from the create tarballs duty, it just means that

  1   2   3   4   >