Re: [Biofuel] In French ?

2006-01-06 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Hello Oliver.
I have some interesting ideas concerning biofuel in Switzerland. Contact me
on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ASAP for further discussions.
Jan
Jan Warnqvist
AGERATEC AB

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89
+46 70 499 38 45
- Original Message - 
From: Mike Weaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Saturday, December 10, 2005 5:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] In French ?


Bonjour,

in researching the possibility of making BD with Isopropyl Alcohol, I
have noticed than in Europe many countries refer to biodiesel as FAME;
this may be a useful term to search for when looking for French language
information.

-Mike

Keith Addison wrote:

I would highly recommend also using:

http://world.altavista.com/

I would highly recommend also using an online translator such as
AltaVista's
Babelfish (http://world.altavista.com/).  I have used it frequently for
Russian to English, and it seems to have no problem with English to French
when you use the Translate a web page option.

--Randall
Charlotte, NC



Hello Randall

The machine translators are useful, we've discussed using them here
before, but that was for when people wanted to post messages in
Spanish or French or whatever, not for technical instructions on a
website.

How would American biodieselers for instance like it if they had to
get their information from Journey to Forever via Babelfish?

Here's how the Spanish version of Mike Pelly's titration instructions
come out in English via world.altavista.com:

Disolución of a gram of lejía in a distilled liter of water prepares
one. Asegúrate of which it is dissolved totally. This sample serves
like value of reference in valoración. It is important that this
disolución is not contaminated because serˆ used in many valuations.
Mixture in a container pequeño 10 mililiter of isopropílico alcohol
with 1 mililiter of the oil (asegurate of which it is exactly 1
mililiter). It takes to the oil sample después of it to have warmed
up and to have shaken (5 Figure # 1). Añade two drops of
fenolftaleína, that is an indicator ˆ cido-bases colorless in the
presence of ˆ cidos and red in the presence of bases.

English version:

Make up a solution of one gram of lye to one liter of distilled
water. Make sure it dissolves completely. This sample is then used as
a reference tester for the titration process. It's important not to
let the sample get contaminated, it can be used for many titrations.
Mix 10 milliliters of isopropyl alcohol in a small container with a 1
milliliter sample of WVO -- make sure it's exactly 1 milliliter. Take
the WVO titration sample from the reaction vessel (Figure 5 #1) after
it's been warmed up and stirred. Add to this solution 2 drops of
phenolphthalein, an acid-base indicator that's colorless in acid and
red in base.

Not so good eh?

Lots of people in lots of countries speak French. If there aren't any
good biofuels how-to sites in French there should be. Invitation
stands:



If some of the French-speaking list members wanted to translate the
Journey to Forever Biofuels section into French we'd be happy to host
it, like the Spanish-language site.



Best

Keith





- Original Message -
From: Sam Critchley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, December 09, 2005 11:51 AM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] In French ?




Hi,

Biodiesel is often called diester in French. Here's a French-language
Wikipedia entry with some links to biodiesel in Switzerland at the
bottom:

http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diester

I also suggest doing an advanced search on Google for French-language
pages containing the words biodiesel or diester.

Thanks,

Sam

On Fri, 09 Dec 2005 17:01:00 +0100, Keith Addison
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



Hello Olivier



I have some friends in the French side of Switzerland, Geneva, who are
interested to try to make Biodiesel. They already have a car (a
LandRover I beleive) running on SVO.

But they do not speak (nor read) english.

Do you know by any chance a good web site where they can find
information on how to produce in French ?


I don't. Maybe there isn't one.

If some of the French-speaking list members wanted to translate the
Journey to Forever Biofuels section into French we'd be happy to host
it, like the Spanish-language site.

Regards

Keith Addison
Journey to Forever
KYOTO Pref., Japan
http://journeytoforever.org/






Thanks,
Olivier




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/






___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:

Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel Testing excessive methanol

2006-01-06 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Hello Jim,
since the methanol solubility test worked out well, you probably have
created some soap from the methyl esters.
With best regards
Jan
Jan Warnqvist
AGERATEC AB

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89
+46 70 499 38 45
- Original Message - 
From: JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BIO Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:32 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Biodiesel Testing excessive methanol


 I just tested a 60 Liter batch and have a few questions; below is what I
 have done with the results and further below are my questions,

 The biodiesel used in the tests below was unwashed - glycerin layer
 removed.

 1.) Using the test method noted on JtF ( Jan Warnqvist - Methanol test)
 as prescribed 225 ml Methanol combined with 25 ml of the biodiesel.
 Results: Biodiesel was fully soluble and formed a clear bright phase no
 contaminants or other phases noted. Results after 24 hours - No change.

 2) Using a MODIFIED JtF method,  (combining 4.90875 grams lab grade KOH
 and 100 ml Methanol (Potassium Methoxil) with 1 Liter of the biodiesel)
 - INSTEAD I added 400ml methanol and 4.90875 grams KOH ( Potassium
 Methoxil ) (both lab grade near absolute) to 1 Liter of the Biodiesel. I
 then heated to 120 deg F and mixed for one hour.
 Results: after 24 hours  there was a nice amber layer from the bottom of
 the glass jar up to the last say 1/2 inch where a very very slightly
 amber layer resided to the top. there was nothing at the bottom at all.

 3) Wash test JtF, In a glass jar I shook 1/2 Bio and 1/2 water at room
 temp till mixed into one phase.
 Results: within 1 minute the water and Bio separated and the water was
 quite white. Wash #2 same time of separation water clearer this time.
 Wash # 3 same as #2. Wash # 4 water was not drinking quality but PH is
 close to seven.

 O.K why did I increase the Methanol in test #2) above?  I am not sure
 except to see what it would do, but from what I read it would not harm
 so I did.

 My Question: Can anyone tell me what the strange clear amber layer on
 top of the other clear amber layer may be?

 Could this be the FFA content per L?

 Thanks in advance,

 Jim

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Acid - Base questions

2006-01-06 Thread Jan Warnqvist
Hello Jim,
when using the acid esterification, you will have methyl esters, unreacted
oil, sulphate ions, oxonium ions and - water.
Proceeding to the base step you will create more methyl esters, potassium or
sodium soaps, maybe a little unreacted oil or partially reacted oil,
potassium or sodium sulphates and - even more water.
This method works fine if the water content can be kept on a reasonable
level. Please note that the higher the initial FFA level, the more water
will be produced.
With best regards
Jan
Jan Warnqvist
AGERATEC AB

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89
+46 70 499 38 45
- Original Message - 
From: JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BIO Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 3:01 AM
Subject: [Biofuel] Acid - Base questions


 I have decided to try the acid/base method in small test batches as I
 have some High FFA (4ml) oil I would like to process.  Since September I
 have gone to great lengths to get repeatability and accuracy in all my
 work with Biodiesel. I have read and re-read JtF and I know that I will
 no doubt read it several more times if I get stumped.  I would like to
 start with fully understanding the process first.
 Before I start:
 Can you use KOH with the Acid Base method?  It might be obvious, but I
 did not see it in the recipe as a substitution.

 When the acid gets done with Estrification properly then the mix that is
 left is basically an oil (triglycerides) , Methanol,  and Sulfur ions ?
 Or did I miss something?

 When the Methoxil is added the Sulfur gets combined with the Sodium
 ions, (right?) how does this affect the reaction?

 Any good experienced information would be helpful,

 Jim

 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/





___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Is Washington Planning a Military Strike on Iran?

2006-01-06 Thread fox mulder

--- Hakan Falk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 Sometimes I wonder why they add in things that might
 had happened, but did not.
 
 At 07:56 05/01/2006, you wrote:
 snip
 -- as evidenced by Erdogan's recent phone call to
 Ariel Sharon,
 congratulating the prime minister on his recent
 recovery from heart
 surgery.
 
 We now know that Sharon never underwent a heart
 surgery, it was 
 scheduled, but could not be done because of his
 massive stroke. He 
 did however recover from a minor stroke earlier, but
 heart surgery?
 
 Hakan
#

I remember who is responsible for the masacre of
inocent wemen and children in two refugee camps in
labonan in the early 80's. Also myriad palistinian
prisoners in into a football stadiium and never got
out
 
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
 archives (50,000 messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 




___ 
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! 
Security Centre. http://uk.security.yahoo.com

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] quality test questions

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
Hi Joe

Hi Keith;

Best wishes for the new year

Thankyou, and to you and all.

and thanks for your tireless (seemingly) effort around here.

You're most welcome, thanks again. In truth I haven't had much time 
for the list recently, we've been rushed off our feet for the last 
four months, every day we run out of time. Seems we're emerging now, 
most everything's done, we got there, can't believe it.

I hope it doesn't look like I am implying a good titration can't be 
done without going to this length.  That is not the case.

I don't think you implied that, that's not what I was thinking, sorry 
if you thought it was. I guess I was thinking K.I.S.S., but that's a 
moveable feast.

I just wanted to share the idea incase anyone else wanted to give it a whirl.

I much admire your attitude to sharing and what you've said about it 
before, said and done. Would that more people saw it that way. But 
maybe enough do, for it to work and to spread, seems so.

Yes I know it looks too elaborate, but it really was quite simple to 
put together and was done in less than a day.  In the beginning, I 
started out with 2 ml oil and 20 ml IPA in a 50 ml beaker standing 
in a small wide mouth mason jar of hot water, stirring with a 
popsicle stick in between dribbling the titrating solution.  I'm 
sure I could have continued with this.  I did find it was a little 
inconsistent but mostly I found it too fiddley.  I'm just clumsy I 
guess but I'm glad I put the (small relative to the rest of the 
project) effort into my little kit.  Now I have both hands free and 
can dribble the solution smoothly without interruption just watching 
for the indicator to go off, and get very repeatable results which 
didn't used to be the case before. Probably my technique I guess 
(I'm less dangerous with a soldering iron than a pipette) and as you 
were saying in a recent post about building experience, I might have 
got it down to a routine and worked the variability out of it given 
enough time, but this way I made my life easier by fixing two of the 
variables; the heat is always consistent, as the agitation is, and 
besides, it helps keep me from making a mess :)

:-)

Well, you see, I'm not too happy with a soldering iron. Not that 
soldering's a problem but I'll have nothing to do with those evil 
black magic runes and so on that wicked wizards who're probably out 
to hex me refer to so deceptively as electronic circuit diagrams 
even if I could figure out which way is up. My brother did amazing 
things with them it's true, like his better fly-swatter for 
instance (shudder), but then he was a wicked wizard.

Anyway that was a much better sales pitch, I can see the attraction. 
Fewer variables, an easier life. Useful. Needs a link I think, for 
them as can tell a soldering iron from a wand or know someone who can 
(ie someone who knows how to use a wand). Will do.

Thanks, take care

Keith


Joe



Keith Addison wrote:

Hello Joe

Pardon the snip...

snip



I found that my success depended a lot on how careful I was with the
titration step.  Also I found that when the 0.1% base solution was
added there was a tendancy for some oil to drop out and I think this
affected my accuracy.  I built a stirrer to keep the liquid in the
test tube very well agitated during the titration and this helped a
lot as I could tell by the consistency when I repeated the titration
several times. If you want a description of how to make a very low
cost titration kit check my website
at http://www.nonprofitfuel.ca/Titrator.html



I'm sure it works well, but what puzzles me, and puzzled me when you
first discussed this, is the test tube. Before you made your kit you
were shaking it to agitate it, no? I suppose there's not much else
you can do if you're using a test tube. Why not use something that's
shaped right so you can stir it properly? If you don't have a
suitable beaker an ordinary glass tumbler will do. We get a bit
fancy, we use fine crystal glasses, rescued along with much else from
Tokyo's gomi (rubbish) on its way to Tokyo Bay. They're about 1.5
wide at the bottom and about 4 tall, strong but thin glass so it
warms up quickly when you stand it in hot water, and with a thick
bottom so it retains the heat well. Easy to stir with a chopstick, no
problem at all, no need for anything complicated.

Best

Keith


snip


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil

2006-01-06 Thread bob allen
if that were true, wouldn't walmart be in big trouble vis-a-vis purchases from 
china?

Greg and April wrote:
 IIRC, it's not legal for individual states or cities to make treaties with
 foreign nations, as such an agreement might be considered.
 
 
 Greg H.
 
 
 - Original Message - 
 From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 23:56
 Subject: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
 
 
 http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2710
 
 Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
 
 by Jessica Pupovac (bio)
 
 As Chicago's poorest face an increase to already-high public transit
 fees, the city is ignoring an offer of discounted diesel fuel to
 benefit low-income people.
 Chicago, Dec 28, 2005 - The Chicago Transit Authority is refusing an
 opportunity to alleviate commuting costs for hundreds of thousands in
 the Windy City's low-income neighborhoods. Instead of accepting
 deeply discounted fuel from the Venezuela-owned Citgo Petroleum
 Corporation, the city is instead raising fares to solve budget
 shortfalls.
 
 In an October meeting with representatives from the Chicago Transit
 Authority (CTA), the city's Department of Energy and other city
 officials, Citgo unveiled a plan to provide the Chicago with low-cost
 diesel fuel. The company's stipulation, at the bidding of Venezuelan
 President Hugo Chavez, was that the CTA, in turn, pass those savings
 on to poor residents in the form free or discounted fare cards.
 
 But two months later, despite claims of a looming budget crisis, the
 CTA president has no intent or plan to accept the offer, according
 to CTA spokesperson Ibis Antongiorgi. She gave no explanation.
 
 According to Venezuela's consul general in Chicago, Martin Sanchez,
 the CTA has yet to inform his office of its decision to decline the
 discount offer.
 
 In place of the proposed discount, which the CTA apparently does not
 want Chicagoans to even know about, budget shortfalls will be
 addressed by fare hikes. Chicagoans who are unaware of the Venezuela
 offer will be hit with an increase of 25 cents per ride next month,
 and discounted route-to-route transfers will be eliminated for
 passengers paying cash.
 
 This is going to hurt the poor and the minority people, like me,
 said Dorothy Chew, resident of Humboldt Park, where one-third of
 residents live below the federally recognized poverty level -
 currently just $16,000 for a family of three. Chew relies on the CTA
 to get to work and to Chicago Commons, where she attends classes
 daily in preparation for taking her GED. Since she rarely has money
 to invest in a fare card, she will be forced to pay for transfers the
 majority of the time.
 
 Chew's classmate, Linda Cox, works a minimum-wage job and has been a
 Public Aid recipient for 15 years. She also relies heavily on public
 transportation.
 
 I only earn $560 a month and of that, over $200 a month goes to my
 bus fare, Cox told The NewStandard. I have a 15-year-old and a
 17-year-old who also need to get to school. If they change the prices
 and take away transfers, there are going to be a lot of days missed.
 I already see no money at the end of the month.
 
 The offer of discount fuel is not just confined to Chicago. Over the
 Thanksgiving holiday, the first of Venezuela's oil-for-the-poor
 programs in the US was launched. Citgo struck a deal with three
 nonprofit organizations in the Bronx to deliver 5 million gallons of
 heating oil at 45 percent below the market price. The deal will
 amount to a savings of $4 million for the 8,000 low-income households
 slated to benefit from the plan.
 
 This is going to hurt the poor and the minority people, like me. -- 
 Dorothy Chew Citgo has made a similar arrangement with Citizens
 Energy Corp. in Boston for the sale and distribution of 12 million
 gallons, saving low-income and elderly residents there a total of $10
 million. The company's website says that it expects to expand the
 program to other boroughs in New York City and that it is exploring
 the possibility of offering discounted fuel to residents in Maine,
 Rhode Island, Connecticut and Pennsylvania.
 
 However, in all of Illinois, only about 12,000 households use heating oil.
 
 So instead of fuel for heat, Citgo representatives offered the CTA a
 40-50 percent discount on diesel fuel for buses to benefit Chicagoans
 most in need of relief from soaring oil and gas prices this winter.
 
 We didn't know how else to reach enough people, said Consul Sanchez.
 
 Another difference between the Chicago offer and the programs enacted
 in the Northeast is that Citgo proposed to work with a government
 agency, rather than nonprofit organizations. The CTA relies on the US
 federal government - which is in a constant war of words with
 Venezuelan President Chavez - for much of its funding. In fact, just
 weeks after Citgo made its offer to the CTA, Congress signed the
 Federal 

Re: [Biofuel] was.. Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
Not to mention, there is a Citgo station at the Pentagon.  I buy B20
there sometimes.

Dammit Mike, now who're we supposed to arrest, you, Citgo, or the 
Pentagon? Arrest them all, it's the only way - everybody in my police 
van, no excuses, no use trying to blame Redler for all the spaghetti 
either, alles verbode.

Keith


AEN wrote:

 Hello,
 The agreements to supply discounted heating oil have been made 
through citgo,
 the legal U.S. subsiid.. with full business status in the U.S. 
It is not a situation
  of  making treaties with foreign nations,  so it should not be 
considered as such
 You don't see U.S. oil co's offering any relief what so ever on 
heating fuel costs do you?.
  Even after the record profits that they have raked in
 last year. The whole situation is purely political and if Canada 
or Britain offered the same deal, it would
 most probably be gratefully accepted. Is it ok to say we are not 
going to accept oil from an alleged
 oppressive regime such as Chaves's while bombing Bagdad? This is 
no defence of Citgo but they
 regularly offer discounted oil to poor people in several other 
countries as well. Might be something
 U.S. OIL could look at...don't hold your breath. Pure political BS.
 
 OK, so Chicago authorities want to save face and not get involved 
for their own reasons
 mean while thousands of poor Americans can't afford to keep warm 
this winter or obtain
 discount transport.
 
 regards
 tallex
 
 
 
 
 
  ---Original Message---
  From: Greg and April [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  Sent: 05 Jan '06 15:17
 
  IIRC, it's not legal for individual states or cities to make treaties with
  foreign nations, as such an agreement might be considered.
 
 
  Greg H.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Get your daily alternative energy news
 
 Alternate Energy Resource Network
   1000+ news sources-resources
updated daily
 
 http://www.alternate-energy.net
 
 
 
 
 
 
 Next Generation Grid
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid/
 
 
 
 
 
 Tomorrow-energy
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy/
 
 
 
 
 Alternative Energy Politics
 http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics/
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
  - Original Message -
  From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
  Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 23:56
  Subject: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
 
 
  http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2710
 
  Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
 
  by Jessica Pupovac (bio)
 
  As Chicago's poorest face an increase to already-high public transit
  fees, the city is ignoring an offer of discounted diesel fuel to
  benefit low-income people.

snip

 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Dewatering with vacuum.

2006-01-06 Thread Joe Street




Hey Jacko

According to the hyperphysics page (great page) and here it is:

http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/kinetic/watvap.html#c2

You see the vapour pressure of water at room temperature is roughly 17
mm of mercury. This is less than 1 inch so you would need better than
29" Hg vacuum to boil off the water. It will be a challenge to get to
29" and it will require a good pump and large diameter piping and good
attention to seals and valve types.(read $$) My reactor uses ball
valves which are not really suitable for vacuum service (I'm used to
talking High Vacuum 10e-12 torr -microns of mercury are gross units to
me, but we are talking an order higher than that, mm really gross) so
for this purpose I can get away with ball valves. I do everything in
the reactor vessel because I have space restictions. Processing begins
right after drying the oil in situ. So therefore I use the immersion
heater to heat the oil to 50 deg. C while drying and then add the
methoxide after venting most of the vacuum.
If you interpolate the data from the page you see that at 50 deg. C the
vapor pressure rises to around 100 mm which means roughly 26" hg vacuum
(29.92" - 4"). This is something which is readily achievable even with
a small pumping line (I use 1/4" poly tube from the pump to my liquid
trap and 1/2 " condenser to the top of the water tank) and ball valves
seem to be up to the task (so far). I can get to 28" with this setup
but when the vacuum creeps past the 27" mark I start the process. So
the process goes like:


  Fill tank and begin heating (takes two hours)
  Drain liquid water
  Vacuum dry (about 1 hr)
  Mix chemicals and run reaction 2 hr
  Settle overnight. (want to reduce this if possible, have similar
question about acceptable limits of byproduct before washing)
  3 wash cycles 6 hrs
  Vacuum dry 1 hr.


As to your question about what is the acceptable vacuum limit. What you
are really asking is how much water can we get away with. I would like
to know as well. I do know that a couple of times when I have let the
dried oil sit in the reactor (under vacuum but with the pump off and
valves closed) for a couple of days before reacting, a small amount of
water vapor would re-condense in the tubing which is part of the
recirculation system, which is at room temperature outside the
insulation jacket. I estimated it was about 1cc (out of a 25 liter
batch) or roughly 40ppm water and the batch was fine.

Hope this helps
Joe




[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  
  
  

  Can vacuum be used alone to dewater oil at room temp?
  
Or even at slightly elevated temp? 55 deg. C would be a good temp so
  when it finished drying it could be sent directly to the
processor. I would also
need a condenser to keep the evacuated water out of the vacuum pump.
  
A friend of mine (in ACR) uses vacuum @30" water column to take
the water
content to 300 micron. What micron is acceptable other than the obvious
0
micron?
  
I am just looking at options vs costs. I seen a post the other day and
it
made me sit back and think.
  
As always appreciate your input.
  
John Frey
  
  

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/

  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel story from Madison, Wisconsin

2006-01-06 Thread Joe Street
Wow you are brave dude! I was contacted by the CTV who wanted to do the 
same story here in Canada and then I thought twice about having them in 
my house with the TV cameras. Just out of curiosity has anyone form your 
house insurance company seen it and contacted you yet?

Joe

Sean Michael Dargan wrote:

Greetings to my brothers and sisters in the noble
biodiesel movement!

I thought you might like to see this story that our
local news did on me and my obsession with BD.  You
might get a kick out of it... I'm kind of a dork.

Here's the link.  Click on the video story link at
the top of the page.  

http://www.wkowtv.com/index.php/news/story/p/pkid/22991#videowindow

Keep the faith, etc.

Sean Michael Dargan
Singer/Songwriter/Bagpiper/Rockstar
Madison, Wisconsin USA
www.seanmichaeldargan.com




   
__ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



  



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Dewatering with vacuum.

2006-01-06 Thread logan vilas



Water boils off at 43F at 20-50mmhg of vacuum at sea 
level.At 140F it takes about 150-200mmhg.When fluids are mixed 
togther the Pressure of Vaporization changes especially when thouroughly mixed. 
You do not need a condensor if you are useing a AC type vacuum pump(that's what 
they are designed for).

I know iowa's BECON program flash heats their oil to 230F 
then runs it through a vacuum chamber to achieve dewatering. Unless you have a 
very large vacuum pump or very littlewater in youroil it will take a 
long time. Water multiplies in volume by 10-18 thousand times when 
boiled.

1 Cubic foot = 1728 cubic inches
1 Cubic Inch of water when boiled off = 5.79 cubic feet 
minimum
1 gallon = 231 cubic inches

Vacuum Distilation alone would take a huge amount of time. 
I would still heat then let it settle and remove the water off the bottom. Then 
use vacuum distilation. Remember if you buy a 5CFM vacuum pump that is 
displacement of the piston at no load and full rpm. When you start pulling a 
vacuum that numberfalls off quickely and at 30" that is probably less then 
1CFM.

A Racor Fuel filter/dewaterar MIGHT work also. They are 
built for Diesel engines, but the ones you can afford havelow flow 
rates.

Logan Vilas

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 3:35 
  PM
  Subject: [Biofuel] Dewatering with 
  vacuum.
  
  Can vacuum be used alone to dewater oil at room temp?Or even at 
  slightly elevated temp? 55 deg. C would be a good temp so
  when it finished drying it could be sent directly to the processor. I 
  would alsoneed a condenser to keep the evacuated water out of the vacuum 
  pump.A friend of mine (in ACR) uses vacuum @30" water column to 
  take the watercontent to 300 micron. What micron is acceptable other than 
  the obvious 0micron?I am just looking at options vs costs. I seen 
  a post the other day and itmade me sit back and think.As always 
  appreciate your input.John Frey
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] BD and Oil Burner

2006-01-06 Thread Thomas Kelly



Hello All,
 I've been using a 30% 
BD/70% heating oil mix in my heating oil tank since August. My oil burner heats 
my water as well as my house.All went well (each time I checked the nozzle 
on the burner it was clean as new) until late in Dec.
 I was away. My wife 
noticed an odor of diesel fuel in the basement. She found a small puddle of oil 
under the furnace. Following is the report from 
the person who serviced the burner:
 Oil leak under the 
burner
 Nozzle jelled up 
outside
 Found some sort of jelly 
built up on end of nozzle
 Oil was dripping down 
blast tube

I suspect that the 
difference in the performance of the mix in Dec vs Aug through Nov, is the 
cold. Although my oil tank is inside, it is in my basement where temps 
drop below 50F on cold days. The fuel line to the burner is 12 ft long and runs 
along an exterior wall. 
During the colder 
months I use the bestWVO, with the lowest cloud point to made BD for my 
car and the rest to make BD for my heating fuel. (My caris outdoors, 
starts on the coldest days and runs well on a 70% BD/30% petro diesel mix. 
It has a small pre-coolant heater that I plug in for an hour before 
starting.)
 Questions:
1. Am I right in assuming 
that the "jelly" on the nozzle is the thicking of the BD due to the 
cold?
 2. Can the problem be addressed 
by heating the fuel line to the burner?
 3. Any other 
thoughts?
 
Thanks,
 
Tom
 

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] quality test questions

2006-01-06 Thread Joe Street




Keith;

Well thanks for your kind words r.e. my penchant for sharing info. I
got to tell you it warmed a corner in my little pinko commieluver heart
to hear it. I guess that proves what I suspected all along, that there
is a reason for people to strive other than material or monetary gain.
Call it selfishness I guess LOL.
And that you are adding a link about it to your website.well I also
have to tell you I actually did a little victory dance right here in my
office when I read that news. Santa comes late sometimes it
seemsand here I thought I might suffer the karmic payback that I
downed the milk and cookies my daughter left out!

Thanks for making my day.

Joe



Keith Addison wrote:

  Hi Joe

  
  
Hi Keith;

Best wishes for the new year

  
  
Thankyou, and to you and all.

  
  
and thanks for your tireless (seemingly) effort around here.

  
  
You're most welcome, thanks again. In truth I haven't had much time 
for the list recently, we've been rushed off our feet for the last 
four months, every day we run out of time. Seems we're emerging now, 
most everything's done, we got there, can't believe it.

  
  
I hope it doesn't look like I am implying a good titration can't be 
done without going to this length.  That is not the case.

  
  
I don't think you implied that, that's not what I was thinking, sorry 
if you thought it was. I guess I was thinking K.I.S.S., but that's a 
moveable feast.

  
  
I just wanted to share the idea incase anyone else wanted to give it a whirl.

  
  
I much admire your attitude to sharing and what you've said about it 
before, said and done. Would that more people saw it that way. But 
maybe enough do, for it to work and to spread, seems so.

  
  
Yes I know it looks too elaborate, but it really was quite simple to 
put together and was done in less than a day.  In the beginning, I 
started out with 2 ml oil and 20 ml IPA in a 50 ml beaker standing 
in a small wide mouth mason jar of hot water, stirring with a 
popsicle stick in between dribbling the titrating solution.  I'm 
sure I could have continued with this.  I did find it was a little 
inconsistent but mostly I found it too fiddley.  I'm just clumsy I 
guess but I'm glad I put the (small relative to the rest of the 
project) effort into my little kit.  Now I have both hands free and 
can dribble the solution smoothly without interruption just watching 
for the indicator to go off, and get very repeatable results which 
didn't used to be the case before. Probably my technique I guess 
(I'm less dangerous with a soldering iron than a pipette) and as you 
were saying in a recent post about building experience, I might have 
got it down to a routine and worked the variability out of it given 
enough time, but this way I made my life easier by fixing two of the 
variables; the heat is always consistent, as the agitation is, and 
besides, it helps keep me from making a mess :)

  
  
:-)

Well, you see, I'm not too happy with a soldering iron. Not that 
soldering's a problem but I'll have nothing to do with those evil 
black magic runes and so on that wicked wizards who're probably out 
to hex me refer to so deceptively as "electronic circuit diagrams" 
even if I could figure out which way is up. My brother did amazing 
things with them it's true, like his "better fly-swatter" for 
instance (shudder), but then he was a wicked wizard.

Anyway that was a much better sales pitch, I can see the attraction. 
Fewer variables, an easier life. Useful. Needs a link I think, for 
them as can tell a soldering iron from a wand or know someone who can 
(ie someone who knows how to use a wand). Will do.

Thanks, take care

Keith


  
  
Joe



Keith Addison wrote:



  Hello Joe

Pardon the snip...

snip



  
  
I found that my success depended a lot on how careful I was with the
titration step.  Also I found that when the 0.1% base solution was
added there was a tendancy for some oil to drop out and I think this
affected my accuracy.  I built a stirrer to keep the liquid in the
test tube very well agitated during the titration and this helped a
lot as I could tell by the consistency when I repeated the titration
several times. If you want a description of how to make a very low
cost titration kit check my website
at http://www.nonprofitfuel.ca/Titrator.html



  
  I'm sure it works well, but what puzzles me, and puzzled me when you
first discussed this, is the test tube. Before you made your kit you
were shaking it to agitate it, no? I suppose there's not much else
you can do if you're using a test tube. Why not use something that's
shaped right so you can stir it properly? If you don't have a
suitable beaker an ordinary glass tumbler will do. We get a bit
fancy, we use fine crystal glasses, rescued along with much else from
Tokyo's "gomi" (rubbish) on its way to Tokyo Bay. They're about 1.5"
wide at the bottom and about 4" 

Re: [Biofuel] Intro / Question

2006-01-06 Thread Zeke Yewdall
Have you done any energy loss calculations on your house?  Unless you
have prior bills, that's probably the only way to get a decent figure
for how much fuel you'll need.  Houses vary too much to be able to
give a decent average number, even assuming the same climate. You can
get fancy programs and such to simualte energy use, but I'd just use a
simple UA analysis and heating degree days to get a ballpark.

And it depends alot on your comfort level too.  I happen to like 60F
much better than 70F.

On 1/5/06, David Marquis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Doug,

 I am pretty sure that it is probably cooler here in
 Minnesota. I call it the great tundra wasteland. :-) I
 did some searching on the internet for #2 grade
 heating oil and it is running in the $2.00-$2.30 a
 gallon range. Eeek! Well I believe that I can use/make
 BD of less than that. Even if I had to buy WVO from
 the local BD co-op (not a bad thing) at a 1.00 a
 gallon, I think I would still be under the going rate
 for #2 heating oil.

 500 gallons? That's a lot. I would have thought that
 it would be a lot less... maybe I am not in the know.

 For example, my wife and I have our house thermostat
 set
  at a fairly low (at least according to our friends)
 17 degrees C.
 WOW! that is 62-63 F. I keep it at 66F or 19C.

 What are your thoughts?

 Dave

 --- Doug Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi Dave:
 
  I live in Hamilton, Ontario, which is on the
  western end of Lake Ontario
  and about the same latitude as Rome.  Last year,
  which was somewhat colder
  than normal, we used approximately 500US gallons of
  #2 Fuel Oil to heat our
  house at a cost of $1,400 CND.
  You should probably talk to a fuel oil
  distributor to get an idea of
  what the average usage in Minnesota will be.  I
  suspect that average usage
  in your area will be somewhat higher then it is
  here.  You live further
  north than I do and I suspect that you also have a
  more continental climate.
  But as I'm sure you are aware, there are a lot of
  things that can impact
  your fuel usage.  For example, my wife and I have
  our house thermostat set
  at a fairly low (at least according to our friends)
  17 degrees C.
 
  Hope this helps,
 
  Doug Turner
 




 __
 Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
 Just $16.99/mo. or less.
 dsl.yahoo.com


 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] BD and Oil Burner

2006-01-06 Thread Jan Warnqvist



Hello Tom,
the leakage you have spotted is no doubt a 
result of material incompability, something that you will have to live with 
unless you find sealings of a compatible material.
The biodiesel from WVO will in case of 
crystallisation, plug the fuel filter of your burner, not causing 
leakages.
Is the jelly thing clear or emulsified 
?
Best regards
Jan WarnqvistAGERATEC AB

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89+46 70 499 38 45

  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Thomas 
  Kelly 
  To: biofuel 
  Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 4:43 
  PM
  Subject: [Biofuel] BD and Oil 
Burner
  
  Hello All,
   I've been using a 30% 
  BD/70% heating oil mix in my heating oil tank since August. My oil burner 
  heats my water as well as my house.All went well (each time I checked 
  the nozzle on the burner it was clean as new) until late in Dec.
   I was away. My 
  wife noticed an odor of diesel fuel in the basement. She found a small puddle 
  of oil under the furnace. Following is the 
  report from the person who serviced the burner:
   Oil leak under the 
  burner
   Nozzle jelled up 
  outside
   Found some sort of jelly 
  built up on end of nozzle
   Oil was dripping down 
  blast tube
  
  I suspect that the 
  difference in the performance of the mix in Dec vs Aug through Nov, is the 
  cold. Although my oil tank is inside, it is in my basement where temps 
  drop below 50F on cold days. The fuel line to the burner is 12 ft long and 
  runs along an exterior wall. 
  During the colder 
  months I use the bestWVO, with the lowest cloud point to made BD for my 
  car and the rest to make BD for my heating fuel. (My caris outdoors, 
  starts on the coldest days and runs well on a 70% BD/30% petro diesel 
  mix. It has a small pre-coolant heater that I plug in for an hour before 
  starting.)
   Questions:
  1. Am I right in assuming 
  that the "jelly" on the nozzle is the thicking of the BD due to the 
  cold?
   2. Can the problem be 
  addressed by heating the fuel line to the burner?
   3. Any other 
  thoughts?
   
  Thanks,
   
  Tom
   
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] BD and Oil Burner

2006-01-06 Thread Thomas Kelly



Jan,
 Thanks for your prompt 
response.
 My first thought upon 
hearing of a leak from the burner was that there was a problem with a rubber 
component such as a seal. (I had been assured that, since the burner was 
installed in 1992, the seals were all synthetic and would not leak). If that 
were the case it should still be leaking, no? More than two weeks after the 
nozzle was replaced and the blast tube was adjusted there is no sign of a 
leak.
 The explanation for the 
puddle of oil (from the service man) was that the clogged nozzle was not 
spraying all of the oil into the ignition spark. The furnace was not burning all 
of the oil being sprayed though the nozzle. Unburned oil was dripping down the 
blast tube.
 I also considered that the 
jelled BD should be trapped in the filter (and possibly clog it). The filter is 
located at the tank. There is no second filter in the frunace. My concern is 
that the fuel travels 12ft through narrow copper tubing along the floor at an 
exterior wall in a basement that currently is 45F. Could it be flowing through 
the filter, only to cool further inside the fuel line on its way to the 
burner?
 I didn't see the jelly on 
the nozzle so I can't comment on its appearance.
 There was an add in the 
local paper for Biodiesel Heating Fuel. The add stated that it could be used in 
any burner that used heating oil. I appreciate your help, as one of my goals is 
to provide low cost .. as in free ... heating oil to people in need in my 
community. I have to get it to work in my own furnace first.
 
Thanks again,
 
Tom


  - Original Message - 
  From: 
  Jan Warnqvist 
  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 11:43 
  AM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] BD and Oil 
  Burner
  
  Hello Tom,
  the leakage you have spotted is no doubt 
  a result of material incompability, something that you will have to live with 
  unless you find sealings of a compatible material.
  The biodiesel from WVO will in case of 
  crystallisation, plug the fuel filter of your burner, not causing 
  leakages.
  Is the jelly thing clear or emulsified 
  ?
  Best regards
  Jan WarnqvistAGERATEC AB
  
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  
  + 46 554 201 89+46 70 499 38 45
  
- Original Message - 
From: 
Thomas 
Kelly 
To: biofuel 
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 4:43 
PM
Subject: [Biofuel] BD and Oil 
Burner

Hello All,
 I've been using a 30% 
BD/70% heating oil mix in my heating oil tank since August. My oil burner 
heats my water as well as my house.All went well (each time I checked 
the nozzle on the burner it was clean as new) until late in 
Dec.
 I was away. My 
wife noticed an odor of diesel fuel in the basement. She found a small 
puddle of oil under the furnace. Following is 
the report from the person who serviced the burner:
 Oil leak under the 
burner
 Nozzle jelled up 
outside
 Found some sort of 
jelly built up on end of nozzle
 Oil was dripping down 
blast tube

I suspect that 
the difference in the performance of the mix in Dec vs Aug through Nov, is 
the cold. Although my oil tank is inside, it is in my basement where 
temps drop below 50F on cold days. The fuel line to the burner is 12 ft long 
and runs along an exterior wall. 
During the colder 
months I use the bestWVO, with the lowest cloud point to made BD for 
my car and the rest to make BD for my heating fuel. (My caris 
outdoors, starts on the coldest days and runs well on a 70% BD/30% petro 
diesel mix. It has a small pre-coolant heater that I plug in for an 
hour before starting.)
 
Questions:
1. Am I right in 
assuming that the "jelly" on the nozzle is the thicking of the BD due 
to the cold?
 2. Can the problem be 
addressed by heating the fuel line to the burner?
 3. Any other 
thoughts?
 
Thanks,
 
Tom
 



___Biofuel mailing 
listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
at Journey to 
Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to 

Re: [Biofuel] BD and Oil Burner

2006-01-06 Thread Paul S Cantrell
Tom,Do you have a clear sight tube after that copper line before the burner?You could see if the fuel is cloudy before it gets to the burner. Or you could keep a mason jar of your mixed fuel near the fuel line where it would maintain the same temperature and you could see if it stays clear.
On 1/6/06, Thomas Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:







Jan,
 Thanks for your prompt 
response.
 My first thought upon 
hearing of a leak from the burner was that there was a problem with a rubber 
component such as a seal. (I had been assured that, since the burner was 
installed in 1992, the seals were all synthetic and would not leak). If that 
were the case it should still be leaking, no? More than two weeks after the 
nozzle was replaced and the blast tube was adjusted there is no sign of a 
leak.
 The explanation for the 
puddle of oil (from the service man) was that the clogged nozzle was not 
spraying all of the oil into the ignition spark. The furnace was not burning all 
of the oil being sprayed though the nozzle. Unburned oil was dripping down the 
blast tube.
 I also considered that the 
jelled BD should be trapped in the filter (and possibly clog it). The filter is 
located at the tank. There is no second filter in the frunace. My concern is 
that the fuel travels 12ft through narrow copper tubing along the floor at an 
exterior wall in a basement that currently is 45F. Could it be flowing through 
the filter, only to cool further inside the fuel line on its way to the 
burner?
 I didn't see the jelly on 
the nozzle so I can't comment on its appearance.
 There was an add in the 
local paper for Biodiesel Heating Fuel. The add stated that it could be used in 
any burner that used heating oil. I appreciate your help, as one of my goals is 
to provide low cost .. as in free ... heating oil to people in need in my 
community. I have to get it to work in my own furnace first.
 
Thanks again,
 
Tom
 -- Thanks,PCHe's the kind of a guy who lights up a room just by flicking a switchA little nonsense now and then, is cherished by the wisest men. - Roald Dahl
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] BD and Oil Burner

2006-01-06 Thread Thomas Kelly



Paul,
 Thanks for the response. 
You have me thinking.
The BD that I added to my fuel oil clouded at 52 - 
54F. My basement can drop down into the 40's. I had assumed that by mixing it 
with heating oil the cloud point would be decreased. Maybe that was an incorrect 
assumption. 
 Is this what I can expect 
from BD that has clouded at low temps - a jelly-like buildup on the nozzle of my 
furnace.
Can I solve the problem by heating the fuel 
line?
 Thinking something like 
this might happen, I learned how to change the nozzle before my father-in-law 
headed for warmer climes.
 Thanks 
again,
 
Tom


From: Paul S Cantrell 

  To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org 
  
  Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 1:23 
  PM
  Subject: Re: [Biofuel] BD and Oil 
  Burner
  Tom,Do you have a clear sight tube after that copper line 
  before the burner?You could see if the fuel is cloudy before it gets 
  to the burner. Or you could keep a mason jar of your mixed fuel 
  near the fuel line where it would maintain the same temperature and you could 
  see if it stays clear. 
  On 1/6/06, Thomas 
  Kelly [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:
  
Jan,
 Thanks for your prompt 
response.
 My first thought upon 
hearing of a leak from the burner was that there was a problem with a rubber 
component such as a seal. (I had been assured that, since the burner was 
installed in 1992, the seals were all synthetic and would not leak). If that 
were the case it should still be leaking, no? More than two weeks after the 
nozzle was replaced and the blast tube was adjusted there is no sign of a 
leak.
 The explanation for 
the puddle of oil (from the service man) was that the clogged nozzle was not 
spraying all of the oil into the ignition spark. The furnace was not burning 
all of the oil being sprayed though the nozzle. Unburned oil was dripping 
down the blast tube.
 I also considered that 
the jelled BD should be trapped in the filter (and possibly clog it). The 
filter is located at the tank. There is no second filter in the frunace. My 
concern is that the fuel travels 12ft through narrow copper tubing along the 
floor at an exterior wall in a basement that currently is 45F. Could it be 
flowing through the filter, only to cool further inside the fuel line on its 
way to the burner?
 I didn't see the jelly 
on the nozzle so I can't comment on its appearance.
 There was an add in 
the local paper for Biodiesel Heating Fuel. The add stated that it could be 
used in any burner that used heating oil. I appreciate your help, as one of 
my goals is to provide low cost .. as in free ... heating oil to 
people in need in my community. I have to get it to work in my own furnace 
first.
 
Thanks again,
 
Tom

-- 
  Thanks,PCHe's the kind of a guy who lights up a room just by 
  flicking a switchA little nonsense now and then, is cherished by the 
  wisest men. - Roald Dahl 
  
  

  ___Biofuel mailing 
  listBiofuel@sustainablelists.orghttp://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.orgBiofuel 
  at Journey to 
  Forever:http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.htmlSearch the 
  combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
  messages):http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Dewatering with vacuum.

2006-01-06 Thread David Miller
logan vilas wrote:

 Water boils off at 43F at 20-50mmhg of vacuum at sea level. At 140F it 
 takes about 150-200mmhg. When fluids are mixed togther the Pressure of 
 Vaporization changes especially when thouroughly mixed. You do not 
 need a condensor if you are useing a AC type vacuum pump(that's what 
 they are designed for).
  
 I know iowa's BECON program flash heats their oil to 230F then runs it 
 through a vacuum chamber to achieve dewatering. Unless you have a very 
 large vacuum pump or very little water in your oil it will take a long 
 time. Water multiplies in volume by 10-18 thousand times when boiled.


Say WHAT?  I'm not sure what number you mean by 10-18 thousand.  The 
number I remember is about 1700 times.

  
 1 Cubic foot =  1728 cubic inches
 1 Cubic Inch of water when boiled off = 5.79 cubic feet minimum
 1 gallon = 231 cubic inches
  
 Vacuum Distilation alone would take a huge amount of time. I would 
 still heat then let it settle and remove the water off the bottom. 
 Then use vacuum distilation. Remember if you buy a 5CFM vacuum pump 
 that is displacement of the piston at no load and full rpm. When you 
 start pulling a vacuum that number falls off quickely and at 30 that 
 is probably less then 1CFM.


You have to multiply the CFM by the pressure. 1/30 atmosphere * 5 CFM = 
1/6 CFM.  It you're trying to pump off a cubic foot of water it would 
take something like 1700 * 6 minutes.  That's a long time to wait:)

--- David



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Intro / Question

2006-01-06 Thread Doug Turner
Hi David:

I may have made a mistake in my metric to US conversion but I believe
that the 1900 litres we used last year is close to 500 US gallons.  As I
mentioned, it was an unusually cold winter here so this might not be a good
indicator.  A local fuel oil supplier would be able to give you a better
idea.  Just call and tell them that you are considering an oil furnace and
you wonder about the operating costs.
We just had an energy audit done this summer and there are some very
significant areas where we can improve the efficiency of our house, which as
it turns out is not very efficient.  This was expected.  The house is a
story and a half double-brick construction built in 1952, an era when energy
costs were not a concern.  So I believe that with a little work and not too
much money we can significantly lower our fuel usage which will be
beneficial regardless of the fuel.
With respect to the price of fuel oil, right now I'm paying 75 cents per
litre or about $2.85 per US gallon (about $2.45 US) so there is not that
much of a price differential.  Many of my neighbours use natural gas and pay
a fair bit more (15-25%) for winter heating.
I'm not sure about the total cost of creating BD because you have to get
the NaOH (which is a relatively small portion of the cost) and the methanol
(much higher percent of the total cost) and there is some energy added to
the process, but BD makes sense from an environmental stand-point,
particularly if you are using WVO that would be discarded anyway.
As for the house temperature, it's a little low by North American
standards but we have friends who have immigrated from Europe and they find
it quite pleasant.  Just buy a few extra sweaters and eat more :)

TTYL

Doug Turner


- Original Message - 
From: David Marquis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 11:30 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Intro / Question


Hi Doug,

I am pretty sure that it is probably cooler here in
Minnesota. I call it the great tundra wasteland. :-) I
did some searching on the internet for #2 grade
heating oil and it is running in the $2.00-$2.30 a
gallon range. Eeek! Well I believe that I can use/make
BD of less than that. Even if I had to buy WVO from
the local BD co-op (not a bad thing) at a 1.00 a
gallon, I think I would still be under the going rate
for #2 heating oil.

500 gallons? That's a lot. I would have thought that
it would be a lot less... maybe I am not in the know.

For example, my wife and I have our house thermostat
set
 at a fairly low (at least according to our friends)
17 degrees C.
WOW! that is 62-63 F. I keep it at 66F or 19C.

What are your thoughts?

Dave

--- Doug Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Dave:

 I live in Hamilton, Ontario, which is on the
 western end of Lake Ontario
 and about the same latitude as Rome.  Last year,
 which was somewhat colder
 than normal, we used approximately 500US gallons of
 #2 Fuel Oil to heat our
 house at a cost of $1,400 CND.
 You should probably talk to a fuel oil
 distributor to get an idea of
 what the average usage in Minnesota will be.  I
 suspect that average usage
 in your area will be somewhat higher then it is
 here.  You live further
 north than I do and I suspect that you also have a
 more continental climate.
 But as I'm sure you are aware, there are a lot of
 things that can impact
 your fuel usage.  For example, my wife and I have
 our house thermostat set
 at a fairly low (at least according to our friends)
 17 degrees C.

 Hope this helps,

 Doug Turner





__
Yahoo! DSL - Something to write home about.
Just $16.99/mo. or less.
dsl.yahoo.com


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Intro / Question

2006-01-06 Thread David Marquis
Thanks for your input. Our house is really bad in the
insulation area. I have done some remodeling and the
insulation that I have put has helped a lot in those
rooms, but the upper floor pretty much doesn't have
any.

I need to replace the furnace so I thought BD would be
a great solution to help the enviroment a little bit
and cut my costs also.

Dave

--- Zeke Yewdall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Have you done any energy loss calculations on your
 house?  Unless you
 have prior bills, that's probably the only way to
 get a decent figure
 for how much fuel you'll need.  Houses vary too much
 to be able to
 give a decent average number, even assuming the same
 climate. You can
 get fancy programs and such to simualte energy use,
 but I'd just use a
 simple UA analysis and heating degree days to get a
 ballpark.
 
 And it depends alot on your comfort level too.  I
 happen to like 60F
 much better than 70F.
 
 On 1/5/06, David Marquis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:
  Hi Doug,
 
  I am pretty sure that it is probably cooler here
 in
  Minnesota. I call it the great tundra wasteland.
 :-) I
  did some searching on the internet for #2 grade
  heating oil and it is running in the $2.00-$2.30 a
  gallon range. Eeek! Well I believe that I can
 use/make
  BD of less than that. Even if I had to buy WVO
 from
  the local BD co-op (not a bad thing) at a 1.00 a
  gallon, I think I would still be under the going
 rate
  for #2 heating oil.
 
  500 gallons? That's a lot. I would have thought
 that
  it would be a lot less... maybe I am not in the
 know.
 
  For example, my wife and I have our house
 thermostat
  set
   at a fairly low (at least according to our
 friends)
  17 degrees C.
  WOW! that is 62-63 F. I keep it at 66F or 19C.
 
  What are your thoughts?
 
  Dave
 
  --- Doug Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
   Hi Dave:
  
   I live in Hamilton, Ontario, which is on the
   western end of Lake Ontario
   and about the same latitude as Rome.  Last year,
   which was somewhat colder
   than normal, we used approximately 500US gallons
 of
   #2 Fuel Oil to heat our
   house at a cost of $1,400 CND.
   You should probably talk to a fuel oil
   distributor to get an idea of
   what the average usage in Minnesota will be.  I
   suspect that average usage
   in your area will be somewhat higher then it is
   here.  You live further
   north than I do and I suspect that you also have
 a
   more continental climate.
   But as I'm sure you are aware, there are a lot
 of
   things that can impact
   your fuel usage.  For example, my wife and I
 have
   our house thermostat set
   at a fairly low (at least according to our
 friends)
   17 degrees C.
  
   Hope this helps,
  
   Doug Turner
  
 
 
 
 
  __
  Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about.
  Just $16.99/mo. or less.
  dsl.yahoo.com
 
 
  ___
  Biofuel mailing list
  Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
  Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
  http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
  Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
 archives (50,000 messages):
 

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 
 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org

http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org
 
 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
 
 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list
 archives (50,000 messages):

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
 
 




__ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] biodiesel with heat and pressure

2006-01-06 Thread manuel cilia
Hello my name is Manuel, Has anyone here tried to make biodiesel with very 
high FFA using high temp and high pressure using ethanol.

thanks 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Acid - Base questions

2006-01-06 Thread JJJN
Thanks Jan,
If I had developed a method to separate FFA's from base stock without 
using chemicals or water say in the range of 95% separation in WVO 
(still a work in progress but hopeful results) so that I could React the 
Low FFA's in a Base method then would it be feasible to react the High 
FFA's In a separate Acid reaction? Or what problems would I encounter 
like the water problem you noted below?  Would the FFA's be worth the 
trouble?

Thanks Jim

Jan Warnqvist wrote:

Hello Jim,
when using the acid esterification, you will have methyl esters, unreacted
oil, sulphate ions, oxonium ions and - water.
Proceeding to the base step you will create more methyl esters, potassium or
sodium soaps, maybe a little unreacted oil or partially reacted oil,
potassium or sodium sulphates and - even more water.
This method works fine if the water content can be kept on a reasonable
level. Please note that the higher the initial FFA level, the more water
will be produced.
With best regards
Jan
Jan Warnqvist
AGERATEC AB

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89
+46 70 499 38 45
- Original Message - 
From: JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BIO Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 3:01 AM
Subject: [Biofuel] Acid - Base questions


  

I have decided to try the acid/base method in small test batches as I
have some High FFA (4ml) oil I would like to process.  Since September I
have gone to great lengths to get repeatability and accuracy in all my
work with Biodiesel. I have read and re-read JtF and I know that I will
no doubt read it several more times if I get stumped.  I would like to
start with fully understanding the process first.
Before I start:
Can you use KOH with the Acid Base method?  It might be obvious, but I
did not see it in the recipe as a substitution.

When the acid gets done with Estrification properly then the mix that is
left is basically an oil (triglycerides) , Methanol,  and Sulfur ions ?
Or did I miss something?

When the Methoxil is added the Sulfur gets combined with the Sodium
ions, (right?) how does this affect the reaction?

Any good experienced information would be helpful,

Jim

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000


messages):
  

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/







___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil

2006-01-06 Thread Greg and April
Todd,

There is a world of difference between a non-profit organization buying cut
rate fuel for the use of non-profit distribution to the poor, and a local
government buying cut rate fuel for use in a 'for profit' program, even if
it is supposed to benefit the poor.

If Chicago was to buy the cut rate fuel, there would eventually be allot
scandal issues, with accusation and counter accusation about members of the
local government benefiting  taking advantage from the cost difference.
Eventually things would have ended up in court ( an expensive place ).
This is what Chicago avoided by declining the fuel.

OTOH, if a non-profit organization was to buy the fuel at the cut rate, and
sell it to Chicago at the market price, then use the money gained to
distribute special discount bus passes to the poor, then the poor would
benefit, and the government could not.The same thing could have been
achieved if the Citgo sold the fuel at market price, and gave a non-profit
origination the difference between the money to reimburse the poor of
Chicago for difference in the cost of the more expensive bus passes.

What I am saying, is that arrangements could have been different, that would
allow the poor to benefit, without bringing Venezuela by way of Citgo and
the government of Chicago directly into contact.There should be a
non-political organization that does not benefit in any way between Citgo
and the poor of Chicago to avid the taint of corruption  bribery.** It
should be this way even if it was a domestic oil company that was donating
the fuel. **

Greg H.

Why are lemmings better than politicians?
Lemmings only take themselves of cliffs.
Politicians try to send you ahead telling you what a favor they are doing
you to let you go first!



- Original Message - 
From: Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 22:30
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil


Large difference between signing a treaty and signing a contract.

Until such time as some form of federal embargo is placed against
Venezuela, the market remains open and there are no restrictions against
such a transaction.

Todd Swearingen



Greg and April wrote:

Not really.

See a previous post with the subject - Venezuela Oil Fields Back in State
Control, from Keith Addison:

In 2001, it passed a new law requiring oil production to be carried out by
companies majority-owned by the government.

Greg H.


- Original Message - 
From: Marty Phee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:04
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil


Very true, but wouldn't they be signing a contract with Citgo and not
Venezuela.



Greg and April wrote:


IIRC, it's not legal for individual states or cities to make treaties with
foreign nations, as such an agreement might be considered.


Greg H.


- Original Message - 
From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 23:56
Subject: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil


http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2710

Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil

by Jessica Pupovac (bio)

As Chicago's poorest face an increase to already-high public transit
fees, the city is ignoring an offer of discounted diesel fuel to
benefit low-income people.
Chicago, Dec 28, 2005 - The Chicago Transit Authority is refusing an
opportunity to alleviate commuting costs for hundreds of thousands in
the Windy City's low-income neighborhoods. Instead of accepting
deeply discounted fuel from the Venezuela-owned Citgo Petroleum
Corporation, the city is instead raising fares to solve budget
shortfalls.

In an October meeting with representatives from the Chicago Transit
Authority (CTA), the city's Department of Energy and other city
officials, Citgo unveiled a plan to provide the Chicago with low-cost
diesel fuel. The company's stipulation, at the bidding of Venezuelan
President Hugo Chavez, was that the CTA, in turn, pass those savings
on to poor residents in the form free or discounted fare cards.

But two months later, despite claims of a looming budget crisis, the
CTA president has no intent or plan to accept the offer, according
to CTA spokesperson Ibis Antongiorgi. She gave no explanation.

According to Venezuela's consul general in Chicago, Martin Sanchez,
the CTA has yet to inform his office of its decision to decline the
discount offer.

In place of the proposed discount, which the CTA apparently does not
want Chicagoans to even know about, budget shortfalls will be
addressed by fare hikes. Chicagoans who are unaware of the Venezuela
offer will be hit with an increase of 25 cents per ride next month,
and discounted route-to-route transfers will be eliminated for
passengers paying cash.

This is going to hurt the poor and the minority people, like me,
said Dorothy 

[Biofuel] Questions on Acid Step in Foolproof Process

2006-01-06 Thread Dennis Mahoney



Does anyone have experience measuring the 
conversion of ffa to ester in the acid step? I have tried the reaction 
using choice white grease (cwg is hog or beef fat, ffa is about 4 on the sample 
I used) and I did get a better split in the final result after the base 
hydrolysis. I am wondering about the acid step, though, because many 
acidolysis esterifications are carried out at much higher temperatures. 
Right now I plan to get the before and after the step value of the TAN and look 
for changes in glycerol, methyl esters and residual free fatty acids by GC/ mass 
spec. Any comments on other items I should look for would be 
appreciated. My ultimate goal is to do other transesterifications to make 
an industrial feedstock but this seemed like a good place to start. 


Thanks,
Dennis Mahoney


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Biodiesel Testing excessive methanol

2006-01-06 Thread JJJN
Thanks Jan,
You have confirmed what I have researched from JtF about the base 
converting the methyl esters back to mono and di glycerides (can happen) 
and that certainly makes sense as the bio was unwashed therefore it 
would have had additional catalyst available for this to happen.

Thanks again for your help here

Jan Warnqvist wrote:

Hello Jim,
since the methanol solubility test worked out well, you probably have
created some soap from the methyl esters.
With best regards
Jan
Jan Warnqvist
AGERATEC AB

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

+ 46 554 201 89
+46 70 499 38 45
- Original Message - 
From: JJJN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: BIO Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Monday, January 02, 2006 7:32 PM
Subject: [Biofuel] Biodiesel Testing excessive methanol


  

I just tested a 60 Liter batch and have a few questions; below is what I
have done with the results and further below are my questions,

The biodiesel used in the tests below was unwashed - glycerin layer
removed.

1.) Using the test method noted on JtF ( Jan Warnqvist - Methanol test)
as prescribed 225 ml Methanol combined with 25 ml of the biodiesel.
Results: Biodiesel was fully soluble and formed a clear bright phase no
contaminants or other phases noted. Results after 24 hours - No change.

2) Using a MODIFIED JtF method,  (combining 4.90875 grams lab grade KOH
and 100 ml Methanol (Potassium Methoxil) with 1 Liter of the biodiesel)
- INSTEAD I added 400ml methanol and 4.90875 grams KOH ( Potassium
Methoxil ) (both lab grade near absolute) to 1 Liter of the Biodiesel. I
then heated to 120 deg F and mixed for one hour.
Results: after 24 hours  there was a nice amber layer from the bottom of
the glass jar up to the last say 1/2 inch where a very very slightly
amber layer resided to the top. there was nothing at the bottom at all.

3) Wash test JtF, In a glass jar I shook 1/2 Bio and 1/2 water at room
temp till mixed into one phase.
Results: within 1 minute the water and Bio separated and the water was
quite white. Wash #2 same time of separation water clearer this time.
Wash # 3 same as #2. Wash # 4 water was not drinking quality but PH is
close to seven.

O.K why did I increase the Methanol in test #2) above?  I am not sure
except to see what it would do, but from what I read it would not harm
so I did.

My Question: Can anyone tell me what the strange clear amber layer on
top of the other clear amber layer may be?

Could this be the FFA content per L?

Thanks in advance,

Jim

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000


messages):
  

http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/







___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/


  


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil

2006-01-06 Thread Greg and April
Wal-Mart is not a local government.

Greg H.

- Original Message - 
From: bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 6:50
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil


if that were true, wouldn't walmart be in big trouble vis-a-vis purchases
from china?



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil

2006-01-06 Thread Zeke Yewdall
On 1/6/06, Greg and April [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Wal-Mart is not a local government.

Technically true  thought Walmart is larger and more evil than
most local (and many national) governments.



 Greg H.

 - Original Message -
 From: bob allen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 6:50
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil


 if that were true, wouldn't walmart be in big trouble vis-a-vis purchases
 from china?



 ___
 Biofuel mailing list
 Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

 Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
 http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

 Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
 http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] was.. Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil

2006-01-06 Thread Marylynn Schmidt
And now I have a second choice ..

Hess is offering gas with 10% ethanol .. and that's a totally new 
development here in New Jersey.

.. at least for New Jersey that's a rather major step in the .. hopefully .. 
right direction.

I like having choices.

Mary Lynn
Mary Lynn Schmidt
ONE SPIRIT ONE HEART
TTouch . Animal Behavior Modification . Behavior Problems . Ordained 
Minister .
Pet Loss Grief Counseling . Radionics . Dowsing . Nutrition . Homeopathy . 
Herbs. . Polarity . Reiki . Spiritual Travel
The Animal Connection Healing Modalities
http://members.tripod.com/~MLSchmidt/





From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] was.. Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 22:33:26 +0900

 Not to mention, there is a Citgo station at the Pentagon.  I buy B20
 there sometimes.

Dammit Mike, now who're we supposed to arrest, you, Citgo, or the
Pentagon? Arrest them all, it's the only way - everybody in my police
van, no excuses, no use trying to blame Redler for all the spaghetti
either, alles verbode.

Keith


 AEN wrote:
 
  Hello,
  The agreements to supply discounted heating oil have been made
 through citgo,
  the legal U.S. subsiid.. with full business status in the U.S.
 It is not a situation
   of  making treaties with foreign nations,  so it should not be
 considered as such
  You don't see U.S. oil co's offering any relief what so ever on
 heating fuel costs do you?.
   Even after the record profits that they have raked in
  last year. The whole situation is purely political and if Canada
 or Britain offered the same deal, it would
  most probably be gratefully accepted. Is it ok to say we are not
 going to accept oil from an alleged
  oppressive regime such as Chaves's while bombing Bagdad? This is
 no defence of Citgo but they
  regularly offer discounted oil to poor people in several other
 countries as well. Might be something
  U.S. OIL could look at...don't hold your breath. Pure political BS.
  
  OK, so Chicago authorities want to save face and not get involved
 for their own reasons
  mean while thousands of poor Americans can't afford to keep warm
 this winter or obtain
  discount transport.
  
  regards
  tallex
  
  
  
  
  
   ---Original Message---
   From: Greg and April [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   Sent: 05 Jan '06 15:17
  
   IIRC, it's not legal for individual states or cities to make treaties 
with
   foreign nations, as such an agreement might be considered.
  
  
   Greg H.
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Get your daily alternative energy news
  
  Alternate Energy Resource Network
1000+ news sources-resources
 updated daily
  
  http://www.alternate-energy.net
  
  
  
  
  
  
  Next Generation Grid
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/next_generation_grid/
  
  
  
  
  
  Tomorrow-energy
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tomorrow-energy/
  
  
  
  
  Alternative Energy Politics
  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Alternative_Energy_Politics/
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
  
   - Original Message -
   From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
   To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
   Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 23:56
   Subject: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
  
  
   http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2710
  
   Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
  
   by Jessica Pupovac (bio)
  
   As Chicago's poorest face an increase to already-high public transit
   fees, the city is ignoring an offer of discounted diesel fuel to
   benefit low-income people.

snip




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/




___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
Aramco is a foreign government-owned company, are your local 
governments allowed to buy fuel?

Anyway, whatever, the news report says:

 But two months later, despite claims of a looming budget crisis, the
 CTA president has no intent or plan to accept the offer, according
 to CTA spokesperson Ibis Antongiorgi. She gave no explanation.

If your explanation had any chance of standing up I don't doubt she'd 
have used it, but she didn't. People like Weisbrot would surely know 
it too. I think you're just grabbing for an excuse.

IMHO, considering the current context in the US of oil interests, 
corruption and interfering with foreign governments (and even your 
own), your arguments seem somewhat bizarre. In the context of the 
poor too, especially after some of Hurricane Katrina's revelations. 
But you blamed the victims at the time, didn't you?

Nobody's said the S-word yet (aarghh), LOL!

Best

Keith


Todd,

There is a world of difference between a non-profit organization buying cut
rate fuel for the use of non-profit distribution to the poor, and a local
government buying cut rate fuel for use in a 'for profit' program, even if
it is supposed to benefit the poor.

If Chicago was to buy the cut rate fuel, there would eventually be allot
scandal issues, with accusation and counter accusation about members of the
local government benefiting  taking advantage from the cost difference.
Eventually things would have ended up in court ( an expensive place ).
This is what Chicago avoided by declining the fuel.

OTOH, if a non-profit organization was to buy the fuel at the cut rate, and
sell it to Chicago at the market price, then use the money gained to
distribute special discount bus passes to the poor, then the poor would
benefit, and the government could not.The same thing could have been
achieved if the Citgo sold the fuel at market price, and gave a non-profit
origination the difference between the money to reimburse the poor of
Chicago for difference in the cost of the more expensive bus passes.

What I am saying, is that arrangements could have been different, that would
allow the poor to benefit, without bringing Venezuela by way of Citgo and
the government of Chicago directly into contact.There should be a
non-political organization that does not benefit in any way between Citgo
and the poor of Chicago to avid the taint of corruption  bribery.** It
should be this way even if it was a domestic oil company that was donating
the fuel. **

Greg H.

Why are lemmings better than politicians?
Lemmings only take themselves of cliffs.
Politicians try to send you ahead telling you what a favor they are doing
you to let you go first!



- Original Message -
From: Appal Energy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 22:30
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil


Large difference between signing a treaty and signing a contract.

Until such time as some form of federal embargo is placed against
Venezuela, the market remains open and there are no restrictions against
such a transaction.

Todd Swearingen



Greg and April wrote:

 Not really.
 
 See a previous post with the subject - Venezuela Oil Fields Back in State
 Control, from Keith Addison:
 
 In 2001, it passed a new law requiring oil production to be carried out by
 companies majority-owned by the government.
 
 Greg H.
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Marty Phee [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Thursday, January 05, 2006 10:04
 Subject: Re: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
 
 
 Very true, but wouldn't they be signing a contract with Citgo and not
 Venezuela.
 
 
 
 Greg and April wrote:
 
 
 IIRC, it's not legal for individual states or cities to make treaties with
 foreign nations, as such an agreement might be considered.
 
 
 Greg H.
 
 
 - Original Message -
 From: Keith Addison [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
 Sent: Wednesday, January 04, 2006 23:56
 Subject: [Biofuel] Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
 
 
 http://newstandardnews.net/content/index.cfm/items/2710
 
 Chicago Turns Down Discounted Venezuelan Oil
 
 by Jessica Pupovac (bio)
 
 As Chicago's poorest face an increase to already-high public transit
 fees, the city is ignoring an offer of discounted diesel fuel to
 benefit low-income people.
 Chicago, Dec 28, 2005 - The Chicago Transit Authority is refusing an
 opportunity to alleviate commuting costs for hundreds of thousands in
 the Windy City's low-income neighborhoods. Instead of accepting
 deeply discounted fuel from the Venezuela-owned Citgo Petroleum
 Corporation, the city is instead raising fares to solve budget
 shortfalls.
 
 In an October meeting with representatives from the Chicago Transit
 Authority (CTA), the city's Department of Energy and other city
 officials, Citgo unveiled a plan to provide the Chicago with low-cost
 diesel fuel. The 

Re: [Biofuel] quality test questions

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
Hello Joe

Keith;

Well thanks for your kind words r.e. my penchant for sharing info.

:-) Not just kind, it's most important, IMHO. There are those that 
just take, plenty of them, but I don't think it matters and nor do 
they, just as long as other people go on sharing, which is what real 
humans normally do all the time anyway.

I got to tell you it warmed a corner in my little pinko commieluver 
heart to hear it. I guess that proves what I suspected all along, 
that there is a reason for people to strive other than material or 
monetary gain.  Call it selfishness I guess LOL.

I guess, but there's a whole world of difference between that kind of 
selfishness and the Thatcherist-Reaganite-Friedmanesque rendering 
(greed in drag). Let's just do it our way and see how well the greedy 
manage to thrive on trickle-up eh? g

And that you are adding a link about it to your website.well I 
also have to tell you I actually did a little victory dance right 
here in my office when I read that news.

Did you really? LOL!

Santa comes late sometimes it seemsand here I thought I might 
suffer the karmic payback that I downed the milk and cookies my 
daughter left out!

Ah, you wicked person! What karmic payback might Santa have in store 
for me if I become an accessory after the fact? I'll have to modify 
the link, this man might indeed make a useful titration device but he 
steals his daughter's milk and cookies so on your own head be it. 
D'you think that'll let me off?

Anyway it'll take a day or two to upload the link, I'll send you a 
pointer when done.

Thanks for making my day.

You're most welcome. :-)

Best

Keith


Joe



Keith Addison wrote:

Hi Joe



Hi Keith;

Best wishes for the new year



Thankyou, and to you and all.



and thanks for your tireless (seemingly) effort around here.



You're most welcome, thanks again. In truth I haven't had much time
for the list recently, we've been rushed off our feet for the last
four months, every day we run out of time. Seems we're emerging now,
most everything's done, we got there, can't believe it.



I hope it doesn't look like I am implying a good titration can't be
done without going to this length.  That is not the case.



I don't think you implied that, that's not what I was thinking, sorry
if you thought it was. I guess I was thinking K.I.S.S., but that's a
moveable feast.



I just wanted to share the idea incase anyone else wanted to give 
it a whirl.



I much admire your attitude to sharing and what you've said about it
before, said and done. Would that more people saw it that way. But
maybe enough do, for it to work and to spread, seems so.



Yes I know it looks too elaborate, but it really was quite simple to
put together and was done in less than a day.  In the beginning, I
started out with 2 ml oil and 20 ml IPA in a 50 ml beaker standing
in a small wide mouth mason jar of hot water, stirring with a
popsicle stick in between dribbling the titrating solution.  I'm
sure I could have continued with this.  I did find it was a little
inconsistent but mostly I found it too fiddley.  I'm just clumsy I
guess but I'm glad I put the (small relative to the rest of the
project) effort into my little kit.  Now I have both hands free and
can dribble the solution smoothly without interruption just watching
for the indicator to go off, and get very repeatable results which
didn't used to be the case before. Probably my technique I guess
(I'm less dangerous with a soldering iron than a pipette) and as you
were saying in a recent post about building experience, I might have
got it down to a routine and worked the variability out of it given
enough time, but this way I made my life easier by fixing two of the
variables; the heat is always consistent, as the agitation is, and
besides, it helps keep me from making a mess :)



:-)

Well, you see, I'm not too happy with a soldering iron. Not that
soldering's a problem but I'll have nothing to do with those evil
black magic runes and so on that wicked wizards who're probably out
to hex me refer to so deceptively as electronic circuit diagrams
even if I could figure out which way is up. My brother did amazing
things with them it's true, like his better fly-swatter for
instance (shudder), but then he was a wicked wizard.

Anyway that was a much better sales pitch, I can see the attraction.
Fewer variables, an easier life. Useful. Needs a link I think, for
them as can tell a soldering iron from a wand or know someone who can
(ie someone who knows how to use a wand). Will do.

Thanks, take care

Keith




Joe



Keith Addison wrote:



Hello Joe

Pardon the snip...

snip





I found that my success depended a lot on how careful I was with the
titration step.  Also I found that when the 0.1% base solution was
added there was a tendancy for some oil to drop out and I think this
affected my accuracy.  I built a stirrer to keep the liquid in the
test tube very well agitated during the titration and this helped a

[Biofuel] China signals reserves switch away from dollar

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/f39fa8e4-7e25-11da-8ef9-779e2340.html
FT.com / Home UK -

Saturday Jan 7 2006 . All times are London time. 

China signals reserves switch away from dollar
By Geoff Dyer in Shanghai and Andrew Balls in Washington
Published: January 5 2006 20:13 | Last updated: January 6 2006 02:43

China indicated on Thursday it could begin to diversify its rapidly 
growing foreign exchange reserves away from the US dollar and 
government bonds - a potential shift with significant implications 
for global financial and commodity markets.

Economists estimate that more that 70 per cent of the reserves are 
invested in US dollar assets, which has helped to sustain the recent 
large US deficits. If China were to stop acquiring such a large 
proportion of dollars with its reserves - currently accumulating at 
about $15bn (?12.4bn) a month - it could put heavy downward pressure 
on the greenback.

In a brief statement on its website, the government's foreign 
exchange regulator said one of its targets for 2006 was to improve 
the operation and management of foreign exchange reserves and to 
actively explore more effective ways to utilise reserve assets.

It went on: [The objective is] to improve the currency structure and 
asset structure of our foreign exchange reserves, and to continue to 
expand the investment area of reserves.

We want to ensure that the use of foreign exchange reserves supports 
a national strategy, an open economy and the macro-economic 
adjustment.

The announcement came from the State Administration of Foreign 
Exchange (Safe). It gave no more details about whether this meant a 
big shift in the investment strategy for Chinese reserves, which 
according to local press reports reached nearly $800bn at the end of 
last year and are expected by economists to near $1,000bn this year.

The regulator also said it would end quotas on the amount of foreign 
currency Chinese companies can acquire to invest in overseas assets, 
a decision that removes a bureaucratic hurdle facing companies that 
plan to make international acquisitions.

The statement comes at a time of growing debate in China on how the 
reserves are invested. Some economists have called on Beijing to use 
the funds to finance infrastructure investment and clean up 
state-owned companies, or to invest in higher-yielding assets rather 
than financing US borrowing.

However, according to Stephen Green, economist for Standard Chartered 
in Shanghai, although the language was vague, Thursday's statement 
was the first time Safe has publicly indicated a shift away from 
dollar assets.

It is a subtle but clear signal that they are interested in moving 
away from the US dollar into other currencies, and are interested in 
setting up some kind of strategic commodity fund, maybe just for oil, 
but maybe for other commodities, he said.

The Group of Seven leading industrialised economies has repeatedly 
called for an adjustment in global trade imbalances, including a rise 
in the renminbi. The US has expressed frustration that China has not 
allowed its currency to rise significantly after last July's 2 per 
cent revaluation. That saw China move from a dollar peg to managing 
its currency against a basket of currencies, potentially allowing the 
renminbi to rise against the dollar.

John Snow, US Treasury secretary, speaking earlier on Thursday, 
repeated his call for China to allow the renminbi to rise against the 
dollar. The trade deficit is influenced by lots of things, 
differential growth rates, differential savings rates and investment 
rates and so on. But clearly, getting the [Chinese currency] more 
appropriately valued will be helpful to the global adjustment 
process, he said.

However, some economists believe it would be a mistake for China to 
shift its reserves into domestic investment or other asset classes.


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] The Quiet Death Of Freedom

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11462.htm

The Quiet Death Of Freedom

By John Pilger

01/05/06 ICH -- -- On Christmas Eve, I dropped in on Brian Haw, 
whose hunched, pacing figure was just visible through the freezing 
fog. For four and a half years, Brian has camped in Parliament Square 
with a graphic display of photographs that show the terror and 
suffering imposed on Iraqi children by British policies. The 
effectiveness of his action was demonstrated last April when the 
Blair government banned any expression of opposition within a 
kilometre of Parliament. The High Court subsequently ruled that, 
because his presence preceded the ban, Brian was an exception.

Day after day, night after night, season upon season, he remains a 
beacon, illuminating the great crime of Iraq and the cowardice of the 
House of Commons. As we talked, two women brought him a Christmas 
meal and mulled wine. They thanked him, shook his hand and hurried 
on. He had never seen them before. That's typical of the public, he 
said. A man in a pin-striped suit and tie emerged from the fog, 
carrying a small wreath. I intend to place this at the Cenotaph and 
read out the names of the dead in Iraq, he said to Brian, who 
cautioned him: You'll spend the night in cells, mate. We watched 
him stride off and lay his wreath. His head bowed, he appeared to be 
whispering. Thirty years ago, I watched dissidents do something 
similar outside the walls of the Kremlin.

As night had covered him, he was lucky. On 7 December, Maya Evans, a 
vegan chef aged 25, was convicted of breaching the new Serious 
Organised Crime and Police Act by reading aloud at the Cenotaph the 
names of 97 British soldiers killed in Iraq. So serious was her crime 
that it required 14 policemen in two vans to arrest her. She was 
fined and given a criminal record for the rest of her life.

Freedom is dying.

Eighty-year-old John Catt served with the RAF in the Second World 
War. Last September, he was stopped by police in Brighton for wearing 
an offensive T-shirt, which suggested that Bush and Blair be tried 
for war crimes. He was arrested under the Terrorism Act and 
handcuffed, with his arms held behind his back. The official record 
of the arrest says the purpose of searching him was terrorism and 
the grounds for intervention were carrying placard and T-shirt 
with anti-Blair info (sic).

He is awaiting trial.

Such cases compare with others that remain secret and beyond any form 
of justice: those of the foreign nationals held at Belmarsh prison, 
who have never been charged, let alone put on trial. They are held 
on suspicion. Some of the evidence against them, whatever it is, 
the Blair government has now admitted, could have been extracted 
under torture at Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib. They are political 
prisoners in all but name. They face the prospect of being spirited 
out of the country into the arms of a regime which may torture them 
to death. Their isolated families, including children, are quietly 
going mad.

And for what? From 11 September 2001 to 30 September 2005, a total of 
895 people were arrested in Britain under the Terrorism Act. Only 23 
have been convicted of offences covered by the Act. As for real 
terrorists, the identity of two of the 7 July bombers, including the 
suspected mastermind, was known to MI5, and nothing was done. And 
Blair wants to give them more power. Having helped to devastate Iraq, 
he is now killing freedom in his own country.

Consider parallel events in the United States. Last October, an 
American surgeon, loved by his patients, was punished with 22 years 
in prison for founding a charity, Help the Needy, which helped 
children in Iraq stricken by an economic and humanitarian blockade 
imposed by America and Britain. In raising money for infants dying 
from diarrhoea, Dr Rafil Dhafir broke a siege which, according to 
Unicef, had caused the deaths of half a million under the age of 
five. The then Attorney-General of the United States, John Ashcroft, 
called Dr Dhafir, a Muslim, a terrorist, a description mocked by 
even the judge in his politically-motivated, travesty of a trial.

The Dhafir case is not extraordinary. In the same month, three US 
Circuit Court judges ruled in favour of the Bush regime's right to 
imprison an American citizen indefinitely without charging him with 
a crime. This was the case of Joseph Padilla, a petty criminal who 
allegedly visited Pakistan before he was arrested at Chicago airport 
three and a half years ago. He was never charged and no evidence has 
ever been presented against him. Now mired in legal complexity, the 
case puts George W Bush above the law and outlaws the Bill of Rights. 
Indeed, on 14 November, the US Senate effectively voted to ban habeas 
corpus by passing an amendment that overturned a Supreme Court ruling 
allowing Guantanamo prisoners access to a federal court. Thus, the 
touchstone of America's most celebrated freedom was scrapped. 

[Biofuel] Former Economic Hit Man John Perkins on The First Truly Global Empire and its Impact on Latin America

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/03/1435206
Democracy Now! |

Tuesday, January 3rd, 2006
Former Economic Hit Man John Perkins on The First Truly Global 
Empire and its Impact on Latin America

We speak with the author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man 
about his former work going into various countries to create a secret 
empire through economics after being recruited by the National 
Security Agency. Perkins discusses the policy in the context of the 
recent WTO meetings, the NYC transit strikes, and U.S. economic 
interventions in Latin America. [includes rush transcript]


* John Perkins, from 1971 to 1981 he worked for the international 
consulting firm of Chas T. Main where he was a self-described 
economic hit man. He is the author of the book Confessions of an 
Economic Hit Man.

AMY GOODMAN: We turn now to John Perkins, returning to our airwaves, 
author of Confessions of an Economic Hit Man. Years ago, he wrote the 
words: Economic Hit Men (E.H.M.s) are highly paid professionals who 
cheat countries around the globe out of trillions of dollars. They 
funnel money from the World Bank, the U.S. Agency for International 
Development, and other foreign so-called aid organizations into the 
coffers of huge corporations and the pockets of a few wealthy 
families who control the planet's natural resources. Their tools 
include fraudulent financial reports, rigged elections, payoffs, 
extortion, sex and murder. They play a game as old as empire, but one 
that's taken on new and terrifying dimensions during this time of 
globalization. I should know, John Perkins writes, I was an E.H.M., 
an economic hit man. Welcome to Democracy Now!

JOHN PERKINS: Thank you, Amy. It's great to be here again.

AMY GOODMAN: Well, since we have last talked, many things have taken 
place, from the World Trade Organization meetings in Hong Kong to Evo 
Morales being elected in Bolivia to the New York City transit strike. 
Can you talk about the connections you see?

JOHN PERKINS:I think we're seeing a real change in consciousness, 
which is something we called for here last year about this same time. 
One of the reasons I wrote the book -- because people need to be 
aware -- where you live in a democracy, and people need to be aware 
of what's going on, and I think increasingly people are becoming 
aware of that. Yes, Bolivia voted for Evo Morales, who ran on a very 
strong anti- corporation, anti-U.S. platform; and now Evo Morales 
becomes one of seven presidents in South America, representing over 
80% of the population of South America who have voted - presidents 
who have gone into office because they opposed American policy.

We see in the New York transit strike, laborers standing up to the 
corporatocracy, saying, 'We deserve to have pension funds. We deserve 
to have health care. We deserve to have benefits.' And, yes, at the 
World Trade Organization in Hong Kong, we basically saw the 
corporatocracy beaten. In the end, they put together, you know, a 
statement that made it sound like things were all hunky-dory; but, in 
fact, the developing countries really one in that one. Of course, 
that started in '99 in Seattle and then again in 2003 in Cancun with 
the World Trade Organizations there. So, I think in the last year 
we've seen a tremendous rise in consciousness among people that we 
want to move into new directions, becoming more democratic, make our 
leaders respond in democratic ways.

AMY GOODMAN: When you talk about yourself as an economic hit man, 
explain very briefly. Though we have spoken before, for people who 
didn't hear that conversation, talk about your work as a consultant.

JOHN PERKINS: Well, as an - we economic hit men, basically in the 
last four decades, have managed to create the world's first truly 
global empire; and I talk in detail in the book, Confessions of an 
Economic Hit Man, about this and in various countries where we went 
in to create this first truly global empire. We've done it primarily 
without the military. The military comes in only as a last resort. 
We've done it through economics, and we've done it very, very subtly, 
so it's been a secret empire, unlike all of history's previous 
empires. Most Americans don't realize that we've created this empire. 
They don't realize what we've done in Latin America.

And the way economic hit men work, we use many different techniques, 
but probably the most typical is that we'll identify a company 
[country] that has resources that corporations covet, like oil. We'll 
arrange a huge loan from an organization like the World Bank for that 
country; but the money won't go to that country at all. It goes to 
big U.S. corporations -- Bechtel, Haliburton, ones we all hear about 
all the time -- to build infrastructure projects in that country.

These projects, like industrial parks and power plants, benefit the 
very rich of those countries and do nothing for the poor, except to 
leave the country in a huge debt, one it 

[Biofuel] The Cost of The War

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.tpmcafe.com/story/2006/1/5/11510/30624
TPMCafe ||
Foreign Affairs

The Cost of The War

By Pascal Riche | bio

From: Foreign Affairs

Nobel Laureate Joseph E. Stiglitz and Harvard budget expert Linda 
Bilmes plan to present this week a paper  estimating the cost of the 
Iraq War at between $1-2 trillion. This is far higher than earlier 
estimates of $100-200 billion.

Here is their statement:

Jan 05, 2006 -- 11:05:10 AM EST

NEW STUDY SUGGESTS ECONOMIC COST OF IRAQ WAR MUCH LARGER THAN 
PREVIOUSLY RECOGNIZED

A new study by two leading academic experts suggests that the costs 
of the Iraq war will be substantially higher than previously 
reckoned. In a paper presented to this week's Allied Social Sciences 
Association annual meeting in Boston MA., Harvard budget expert Linda 
Bilmes and Columbia University Professor and Nobel Laureate Joseph E. 
Stiglitz calculate that the war is likely to cost the United States a 
minimum of nearly one trillion dollars and potentially over $2 
trillion.

The study expands on traditional budgetary estimates by including 
costs such as lifetime disability and health care for the over 16,000 
injured, one fifth of whom have serious brain or spinal injuries. It 
then goes on to analyze the costs to the economy, including the 
economic value of lives lost and the impact of factors such as higher 
oil prices that can be partly attributed to the conflict in Iraq. The 
paper also calculates the impact on the economy if a proportion of 
the money spent on the Iraq war were spent in other ways, including 
on investments in the United States

Shortly before the war, when Administration economist Larry Lindsey 
suggested that the costs might range between $100 and $200 billion, 
Administration spokesmen quickly distanced themselves from those 
numbers, points out Professor Stiglitz. But in retrospect, it 
appears that Lindsey's numbers represented a gross underestimate of 
the actual costs. 

The Allied Social Sciences Association meeting is attended by the 
nation's leading economists and social scientists. It is sponsored 
jointly by the American Economic Association and the Economists for 
Peace and Security.

___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] 2005 Was A Very Good Year For The Biotech Food Industry

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.rachel.org/

From: Rachel's Democracy  Health News #837, Jan. 5, 2006

2005 Was A Very Good Year For The Biotech Food Industry

By Peter Montague

[DHN introduction: In this series, we are reviewing the 10 most 
important trends of 2005. -- Editors]

Felix Ballarin spent 15 years of his life developing a special 
organically-grown variety of red corn. It would bring a high price on 
the market because local chicken farmers said the red color lent a 
rosy hue to the meat and eggs from their corn-fed chickens. But when 
the corn emerged from the ground last year, yellow kernels were mixed 
with the red. Government officials later confirmed with DNA tests 
that Mr. Ballarin's crop had become contaminated with a genetically 
modified (GMO) strain of corn.

Because Mr. Ballarin's crop was genetically contaminated, it no 
longer qualified as organically grown, so it no longer brought a 
premium price. Mr. Ballarin's 15-year investment was destroyed 
overnight by what is now commonly known as genetic contamination. 
This is a new phenomenon, less then 10 years old -- but destined to 
be a permanent part of the brave new world that is being cobbled 
together as we speak by a handful of corporations whose goal is 
global domination of food.

Mr. Ballarin lives in Spain, but the story is the same all over the 
world: genetically modified crops are invading fields close by (and 
some that are not so close by), contaminating both the organic food 
industry and the conventional (non-GMO and non-organic) food 
industry.

As a result of genetically contamination of non-GMO crops in Europe, 
the U.S., Mexico, Australia and South America, the biotech food 
industry had an upbeat year in 2005 and things are definitely looking 
good for the future. As genetically modified pollen from their crops 
blows around, contaminating nearby fields, objections to genetically 
modified crops diminish because non-GMO alternatives become harder 
and harder to find. A few more years of this and there may not be 
many (if any) truly non-GMO crops left anywhere. At that point there 
won't be any debate about whether to allow GMO-crops to be grown here 
or there -- no one will have any choice. All the crops in the world 
will be genetically modified (except perhaps for a few grown in 
greenhouses on a tiny scale). At that point, GMO will have 
contaminated essentially the entire planet, and the companies that 
own the patents on the GMO seeds will be sitting in the catbird seat.

It is now widely acknowledged that GMO crops are a leaky technology 
-- that it to say, genetically modified pollen is spread naturally on 
the wind, by insects, and by humans. No one except perhaps some 
officials of the U.S. Department of Agriculture were actually 
surprised to learn this. GMO proponents have insisted for a decade 
that genetic contamination could never happen (wink, wink) and U.S. 
Department of Agriculture officials want along with the gag. And so 
of course GMO crops are now spreading everywhere by natural means, 
just as you would expect.

It couldn't have turned out better for the GMO crop companies if they 
had planned it this way.

Growers of organically-grown and conventional crops are naturally 
concerned that genetic contamination is hurting acceptance of their 
products. Three California counties have banned GM crops. Anheuser- 
Busch Co., the beer giant, has demanded that its home state 
(Missouri) keep GMO rice fields 120 miles away from rice it buys to 
make beer. The European Union is now trying to establish buffer zones 
meant to halt the unwanted spread of GM crops. However, the 
http://www.precaution.org/lib/06/biotech--a_leaky_technology.051108.h 
tmWall Street Journal reported November 8 that, Such moves to 
restrict the spread of GM crops often are ineffective. Last month in 
Australia, government experts discovered biotech canola genes in two 
non-GM varieties despite a ban covering half the country. 
'Regretfully, the GM companies appear unable to contain their 
product, said Kim Chance, agriculture minister for the state of 
Western Australia, on the agency's Web site.

For some, this seems to come as a shocking revelation -- genetically 
modified pollen released into the natural environment spreads long 
distances on the wind. Who would have thought? Actually, almost 
anyone could have figured this out. Dust from wind storms in China 
contaminates the air in the U.S. Smoke from fires in Indonesia can be 
measured in the air half-way around the world. Pollen is measurable 
in the deep ice of antarctica. No one should ever have harbored any 
doubt that genetically modified pollen would spread everywhere on the 
Earth sooner or later. (We are now exactly 10 years into the global 
experiment with GMO seeds. The first crops were planted in open 
fields in the U.S. in 1995. From this meager beginning, global 
genetic contamination is now well along.)

Who benefits from all this? Think of it this way: when all crops on 

[Biofuel] Nuclear War against Iran

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
http://snipurl.com/lcza

Nuclear War against Iran

by Michel Chossudovsky

January 3, 2006

GlobalResearch.ca

The launching of an outright war using nuclear warheads against Iran 
is now in the final planning stages. 

Coalition partners, which include the US,  Israel and Turkey are in 
an advanced stage of readiness. 

Various military exercises have been conducted, starting in early 
2005. In turn, the Iranian Armed Forces have also conducted large 
scale military maneuvers in the Persian Gulf in December in 
anticipation of a US sponsored attack. 

Since early 2005, there has been intense shuttle diplomacy between 
Washington, Tel Aviv, Ankara and NATO headquarters in Brussels.

In recent developments, CIA Director Porter Goss on a mission to 
Ankara, requested Turkish Prime Minister  Recep Tayyip Erdogan to 
provide political and logistic support for air strikes against 
Iranian nuclear and military targets.  Goss reportedly asked  for 
special cooperation from Turkish intelligence to help prepare and 
monitor the operation. (DDP, 30 December 2005).

In turn, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon has given the green light to the 
Israeli Armed Forces to launch the attacks by the end of March: 

All top Israeli officials have pronounced the end of March, 2006, as 
the deadline for launching a military assault on Iran The end of 
March date also coincides with the IAEA report to the UN on Iran's 
nuclear energy program. Israeli policymakers believe that their 
threats may influence the report, or at least force the kind of 
ambiguities, which can be exploited by its overseas supporters to 
promote Security Council sanctions or justify Israeli military action.

(James Petras,  Israel's War Deadline: Iran in the Crosshairs, Global 
Research, December 2005)

The US sponsored military plan has been endorsed by NATO, although it 
is unclear, at this stage, as to the nature of NATO's involvement in 
the planned aerial attacks. 

Shock and Awe 

The various components of the military operation are firmly under US 
Command, coordinated by the Pentagon and US Strategic Command 
Headquarters (USSTRATCOM) at the Offutt Air Force base in Nebraska. 

The actions announced by Israel would be carried out in close 
coordination with the Pentagon. The command structure of the 
operation is centralized and ultimately Washington will decide when 
to launch the military operation. 

US military sources have confirmed that an aerial attack on Iran 
would involve a large scale deployment comparable to the US shock 
and awe bombing raids on Iraq in March 2003: 

American air strikes on Iran would vastly exceed the scope of the 
1981 Israeli attack on the Osiraq nuclear center in Iraq, and would 
more resemble the opening days of the 2003 air campaign against Iraq. 
Using the full force of operational B-2 stealth bombers, staging from 
Diego Garcia or flying direct from the United States, possibly 
supplemented by F-117 stealth fighters staging from al Udeid in Qatar 
or some other location in theater, the two-dozen suspect nuclear 
sites would be targeted.

Military planners could tailor their target list to reflect the 
preferences of the Administration by having limited air strikes that 
would target only the most crucial facilities ... or the United 
States could opt for a far more comprehensive set of strikes against 
a comprehensive range of WMD related targets, as well as conventional 
and unconventional forces that might be used to counterattack against 
US forces in Iraq 

(See Globalsecurity.org at 
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/ops/iran-strikes.htm

In November, US Strategic Command conducted a major exercise of a 
global strike plan entitled Global Lightening. The latter 
involved a simulated attack using both conventional and nuclear 
weapons against a fictitious enemy.

Following the Global Lightening exercise, US Strategic Command 
declared an advanced state of readiness (See our analysis below) 

While Asian press reports stated that the fictitious enemy in the 
Global Lightening exercise was North Korea, the timing of the 
exercises, suggests that they were conducted in anticipation of a 
planned attack on Iran.  

Consensus for Nuclear War

No dissenting political voices have emerged from within the European Union. 

There are ongoing consultations between Washington, Paris and Berlin. 
Contrary to the invasion of Iraq, which was opposed at the diplomatic 
level by France and Germany, Washington has been building a 
consensus both within the Atlantic Alliance and  the UN Security 
Council. This consensus pertains to the conduct of a nuclear war, 
which could potentially affect a large part of the Middle East 
Central Asian region.  

Moreover, a number of frontline Arab states are now tacit partners in 
the US/ Israeli military project.  A year ago in November 2004, 
Israel's top military brass met at NATO headqaurters in Brtussels 
with their counterparts from six members of the Mediterranean basin 

Re: [Biofuel] Intro / Question

2006-01-06 Thread David Marquis
Hi Doug,

Thanks for your input! I am going to call around to
see what people are generally using. 

 The house is a story and a half double-brick
construction built in 1952, an era when energy costs
were not a concern.

Not too shabby! Our house was built in 1896 by some
Italian immigrants that used to run a meat store.
Anyways, long story, shorter, they built this house
and didn't have a lot of money so they used wood
shavings that the meat was packed in..

Cubic yards of shavings fill the walls and really
don't do much for keeping the heat in.

Just buy a few extra sweaters and eat more :)

I can handle that. :-)

Dave
 




__ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 


___
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/biofuel_sustainablelists.org

Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html

Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (50,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/



[Biofuel] Ariel Sharon - Robert Fisk

2006-01-06 Thread Keith Addison
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article11479.htm

Ariel Sharon

Israel's Prime Minister was a ruthless military commander responsible 
for one of the most shocking war crimes of the 20th century, argues 
Robert Fisk. President George Bush acclaims Ariel Sharon as 'a man of 
peace', yet the blood that was shed at Sabra and Chatila remains a 
stain on the conscience of the Zionist nation. As Sharon lies 
stricken in his hospital bed, his political career over, how will 
history judge him?

By Robert Fisk

01/06/05 The Independent -- -- I shook hands with him once, a 
brisk, no-nonsense soldier's grip from Sharon as he finished a review 
of the vicious Phalangist militiamen who stood in the barracks square 
at Karantina in Beirut. Who would have thought, I asked myself then, 
that this same bunch of murderers - the men who butchered their way 
through the Palestinian Sabra and Chatila refugee camps only a few 
weeks earlier - had their origins in the Nazi Olympics of 1936. 
That's when old Pierre Gemayel - still alive and standing stiffly to 
attention for Sharon - watched the order of Nazi Germany and 
proposed to bring some of this order to Lebanon. That's what 
Gemayel told me himself. Did Sharon not understand this. Of course, 
he must have done.

Back on 18 September that same year, Loren Jenkins of The Washington 
Post and Karsten Tveit of Norwegian television and I had clambered 
over the piled corpses of Chatila - of raped and eviscerated women 
and their husbands and children and brothers - and Jenkins, knowing 
that the Isrealis had sat around the camps for two nights watching 
this filth, shrieked Sharon! in anger and rage. He was right. 
Sharon it was who sent the Phalange into the camps on the night of 16 
September - to hunt for terrorists, so he claimed at the time.

The subsequent Israeli Kahan commission of enquiry into this atrocity 
provided absolute proof that Israeli soldiers saw the massacre taking 
place. The evidence of a Lieutenant Avi Grabovsky was crucial. He was 
an Israeli deputy tank commander and reported what he saw to his 
higher command. Don't interfere, the senior officer said. Ever 
afterwards, Israeli embassies around the world would claim that the 
commission held Sharon only indirectly responsible for the massacre. 
It was untrue. The last page of the official Israeli report held 
Sharon personally responsible. It was years later that the 
Israeli-trained Phalangist commander, Elie Hobeika, now working for 
the Syrians, agreed to turn state's evidence against Sharon - now the 
Israeli Prime Minister - at a Brussels court. The day after the 
Israeli attorney general declared Sharon's defence a state matter, 
Hobeika was killed by a massive car bomb in east Beirut. Israel 
denied responsibility. US Defence Secretary Donald Rumsfeld traveled 
to Brussels and quietly threatened to withdraw Nato headquarters from 
Belgium if the country maintained its laws to punish war criminals 
from foreign nations. Within months, George W Bush had declared 
Sharon a man of peace. It was all over.

In the end, Sharon got away with it, even when it was proved that he 
had, the night before the Phalangists attacked the civilians of the 
camp, publicly blamed the Palestinians for the murder of their 
leader, President-elect Bashir Gemayel. Sharon told these ruthless 
men that the Palestinians had killed their beloved chief. Then he 
sent them in among the civilian sheep - and claimed later he could 
never have imagined what they would do in Chatila. Only years later 
was it proved that hundreds of Palestinians who survived the original 
massacre were interrogated by the Israelis and then handed back to 
the murderers to be slaughtered over the coming weeks.

So it is as a war criminal that Sharon will be known forever in the 
Arab world, through much of the Western world, in fact - save, of 
course, for the craven men in the White House and the State 
Department and the Blair Cabinet - as well as many leftist Israelis. 
Sabra and Chatila was a crime against humanity. Its dead counted more 
than half the fatalities of the World Trade Centre attacks of 2001. 
But the man who was responsible was a man of peace. It was he who 
claimed that the preposterous Yasser Arafat was a Palestinian bin 
Laden. He it was who as Israeli foreign minister opposed Nato's war 
in Kosovo, inveighing against Islamic terror in Kosovo. The moment 
that Israel expresses support...it's likely to be the next victim. 
Imagine that one day Arabs in Galilee demand that the region in which 
they live be recognised as an autonomous area, connected to the 
Palestinian Authority... Ah yes, Sharon as an ally of another war 
criminal, Slobodan Milosevic. There must be no Albanian state in 
Kosovo.

Ever since he was elected in 2001 - and especially since his 
withdrawal of settlements from the rubbish tip of Gaza last year, a 
step which would, according to his spokesman, turn any plans for a 
Palestinian state in the