Hi all
10 Days ago, the Verizon 'Whitelist' Team (without name of any responsible
person) send an email to our NOC to get the list of MXes used in our domains.
Apparently because they were blacklisting our IP-Range. (Which I couldn't
notice according our mailserver logs.)
So I wrote back to
Hi all
In short time we got several Email sent from ISP's in India, Singapoore etc.
advertizing the named website.
They even hit the SWINOG Spamtraps and got the URL blacklisted within short
time.
So I contacted the Hoster and Mr. Nöthiger of the secretary of this
organisation.
He was quite
Hi all
We got occasional complaint from spamcop and similar about exchange servers of
customers sending bounces to faked sender addresses.
The only way to solve this problem I have found is to completely disable NDR
in Exchange:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;294757
Am Montag, 30. Januar 2006 19.59 schrieb Lukas Beeler:
* Benoit Panizzon [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Isn't there any way to make exchange reject unknown users during smtp
handshake like all other MTA do?
Of course there is:
Go into ESM, Global Settings, Nachrichtenübermittlung,
Empfängerfilterung
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 11.28 schrieb Marco Balmer:
Hello,
Has everyone experiences with good and bad blacklists for mail-servers?
For the moment I use the following three:
relays.ordb.org
sbl-xbl.spamhaus.org
bl.spamcop.net
I wouldn't use Blacklist for direct blocking anymore. Just
Am Dienstag, 28. Februar 2006 11.45 schrieb Alexis Caceda:
Hi Fredy!
Well.. It's NOT Xchange and NOT Pine ;)
FC is exaclty as BAD :-)
-Benoit-
--
SPAM SPAM SPAM SPAM / Hormel's new miracle meat in a can
Tastes fine, saves time. / If you want something grand, / Ask for SPAM!
- Hormel's 1937
Hi all
Does somebody have a direct contact to a T-Online mailadmin?
It looks like all 6 months or so, they put static IP-Ranges of our customers
with own mailserver on their internal 'dial-up' blacklist.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-System
:0d 0h 2m 24s
Last State Change: 31-01-2007 13:48:29
Current State Duration: 0d 21h 1m 47s
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-System Services
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826
the only ISP which gets this many complaints about emails not
being accepted by mail-fwd.mx.hostcenter.com or are others also affected?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-System Services
Ranges still missing in this whitelist. = [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-System Services
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 PrattelnFax
, this would be a bit useless :-)
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-System Services
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz
to score them correctly.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-System Services
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 01
Schweiz
into the SWINOG whitelists - no reply.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-System Services
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 01
Am Montag, 20. August 2007 14:15 schrieb Josh Geisser:
Although skype is funny, see online status and have a chat, it's not a real
phone-solution.
Someone ever did transcontinental calls? 400ms+ rta?
The good old ISDN is much better :)
And if you dont like fiddeling around with ISDN and
Am Montag, 20. August 2007 14:29 schrieb Michael Horn:
On Mon, 20 Aug 2007, Benoit Panizzon wrote:
I once had 100Fr./Month free Swisscom calls. So I started announcing the
whole Swiss FixNet ranges. This did work pretty well, many other Asterisk
users made good use of my ISDN lines
Hi all
If anyone is interrested
http://jobs.imp.ch/IMP_Kundendienst_Stellenausschreibung.pdf
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-System Services
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93
On Wednesday 31 October 2007 19:25, Jeroen Massar wrote:
As somebody else mentioned today there seems to be something fishy with
the bluewin mailservers, I guess the culprit is the Load balances
which seem to act as NS's. But as these are really nice Load Balancers
are future proof, the real
On Friday 16 November 2007 11.29:56 Mario Iseli wrote:
Hi,
my 3 servers in my personal serverfarm are all listed in the
ch.pool.ntp.org zone. As I think there are also other SwiNOG people running
ntpd's for that project. For about 36 hours my firewall log is growing and
growing, looks like a
Hi all
ScoutNet Switzerland (www.scout.ch) is an association offering hosted services
to the swiss guide and scout movement and other scouting groups in
switzerland.
We have the urgent need to renew our hosting platform. We did try to develop
an own environement exactly fitting our needs for
warning to your users if you get
such messages?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Kundendienst
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61
from our network and not
from others like bluewin.
Do others also experience latency problems to lambdanet in the evenings?
Regards
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Kundendienst
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 08:46 schrieb Adrian Kägi:
About 2 weeks we receive approx. 30% less Spam on our Firewall.
someone knows the same phenomenon?
Not really. Yesterday we got quite little spam:
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 08:54 schrieb Benoit Panizzon:
Am Dienstag, 4. November 2008 08:46 schrieb Adrian Kägi:
About 2 weeks we receive approx. 30% less Spam on our Firewall.
someone knows the same phenomenon?
Ok, I must correct my statement. Since mccolo etc. are down, spam has
it is not usable anymore from some ip-ranges (like
ours and freesurf I was told).
Anyone here from bluewin tech to confirm this and explain why?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter IT Customer Care
and control server? But also this IP seams to change
from time to time.
So what's the best option to get those hosts down?
Kind regards
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter IT Customer Care
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel
]: n2KMnSge030901:
from=*annonymiz...@hispeed.ch, size=5069702, class=0, nrcpts=1,
msgid=c89b210d-7cf2-4c69-8f2d-7cfc6e204...@hispeed.ch, proto=ESMTP,
daemon=MTA, relay=viefep19-int.chello.at [62.179.121.39]
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter IT Customer
On Monday 19 October 2009 18.27:25 Gregoire Galland wrote:
Hi all!
I was wondering who is using Greylisting in their compangny, and if yes,
do they receive any complaints from customers about latency or not
deliverance of mail?
There are mailservers out there who don't cope with greylisting.
?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter IT Customer Care
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz
Hello
Problem still persisty...
Anyone @ Cablecom / UPC reading this list?
I did already try to contact the techs I had contact with last time this
problem occured. No reply yet
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter IT Customer Care
waiting for feedback.
We tell all our affected customers to tell the sender (which are Cablecom
customers) to contact their customer hotline, but we get feedback that the
cablecom customer hotline does not manage to get that problem solved either.
Kind regards
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e
On Saturday 12 December 2009 10.43:23 Pim van Pelt wrote:
Hoi,
At home I have a cablecom consumer connection and it broke yesterday
at around 11pm. I tried to call the 0800 668866 hotline but it seems
it's .. well, hot :) because I get network busy when calling and every
now and again I can
with a swisscom server that was not listed (which I would expect).
If nobody told us, we probably didn't notice :-)
The server in question was 194.11.148.23 (outmail43.swisscom.com).
Tnx, it's being added now.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter
Hi all
It looks like Switch has enabled DNSSEC in the nic.ch Web Interface.
I was able to register my keys.
The whois output states:
DNSSEC:Y
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter IT Customer Care
, this
ends up filling his inbox within very short time.
So I'm still looking for a direct contact to an email tech from UPC Vienna who
could make a statement what UPC is doing to fix the problem.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter IT Customer Care
freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter IT Customer Care
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz Web http
Hi out there
The last few days I noticed quite a large delay when I first dial a number
from my asterisk server.
I found that the problem is that the 1.4.e164.arpa lookup takes enormous time
to return a NXDOMAIN
== ast_get_enum(num='+41618269309', tech='sip', suffix='e164.arpa',
Hello
We used to use the Swisscom GSM number - 0794998990 - but a couple of
months ago, it got unstable, so I took another look. Now we're using
the regular landline SMSC 062210, which works very well.
But you can only send SMS if you're a swisscom customer, so they can charge
the SMS on
Hi all
I seam to quite often stumble over this bug and wonder if the router is buggy
or the client is buggy.
Most Motorola ADSL/VDSL Routers which Swisscom sent to their customers for
about the last two years or so, have a DNS proxy enabled by default. The dhcp
clients get the IP address of
at the ru. SOA and entries pointing to the two NS.
So what is broken with that zone (and many many more ru. and cn. zones). Or is
it OK for a DNS Server not to return any SOA information? Isn't that
mandatory?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter
frequent ixfr updates. The zonefiles are
not too large (50MB at the moment).
We use bind 9.6.ESV.R1.
Please contact me off-list if interrested.
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826
Any information why we can't reach cablecom phone numbers, their website
or their DNS servers ?
I suppose a DNS only outage. I have a running VPN Tunnel to my Home and use my
own DNS. I have connectivity.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G
via spamassassin or
similar, makes it possible for swisscom to find their infected customers.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 Pratteln
accept our
emails?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz Web
customers getting such addresses had troubles connecting to various
services out there.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 Pratteln
an exchange server, but the MX of the sender points to Googles
Postini Service.
Do some others experience similar problems with customers hosted @postini? Is
Postini using MS Exchange Servers?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G
We currently experiencing problems delivering mail to mx.sunrise.ch and
our queues are growing.
Is anybody else experiencing problems delivering mail to sunrise?
Same here, both their mx resolve to the same IP and port 25 does not react.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o
) and is blacklisted on dnsrbl.swinog.ch which also affects other
proxad.net customers. Apparently proxad.net tells their customers to call us
and refuse to get in contact with us to solve the issue.
Kind regards
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G
://www.ipaddresslabs.com
and
http://www.maxmind.com
Do locate the ip addresses correctly to switzerland.
So I suppose SRF uses some other service.
Does somebody know what GeoIP Locator services srf.ch uses? The SRF IT
Helpdesk was not able to tell me.
Kind regards
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W
Hello
The Problem was solved. They use an offline version of the wipmania.com GeoIP
Database. They added our range to their offline database and we have also
submitted the range to wipmania.com as it was flagged 'unknown'.
-Benoit-
___
swinog
can you avoid the disatvantage to generate a shitload of bounces when
operating ab backup MX?
- Is it true, that most ISP offer this kind of service?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G
email infrastructure
as smarthost?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz
?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
A record with underscore is re-created by the ADS and
the problem is back.
Is this some kind of MS DNS bug, or have the DNS RFCs been updated recently to
also allow underscores in other RR and some non bleading edge versions of bind
still use the check from previous rfc?
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p
use as a template for our
agreement?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz
freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
Hi Jeroen
You want to deploy RRL.
Please see http://www.redbarn.org/dns/ratelimits
Excellent, thank you. Didn't know that bind feature.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29
via DNS:
$ host -t txt 0.0.161.157.abuse-contacts.abusix.org
0.0.161.157.abuse-contacts.abusix.org descriptive text ab...@imp.ch
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29
: CH
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz Web http
implementation. Or did the exchange admin
just misconfigure his server?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41
Hello
I'm on a task that turn out to be harder that I expected.
From switch.ch registered .ch domains I'm used to be able to specify the IPv6
addresses of my DNS servers and to upload the DS keys needed for the DNSSEC
chain.
Now I would like to do the same for a .com domain.
But as of today
Hey there
Anyone still able to resolve Google?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz Web http://www.imp.ch
findet man auch nicht auf der Webseite, ob dessen DNS-Server
überhaupt via IPv6 erreichbar sind, ob diese IPv6 Glue Records und DNSSEC
unterstützen, und ob man die DS Records selber aktualisieren kann oder nur via
Kundendienst etc.
Wird dies auch noch kommen?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit
höchsten in Richtung zum eigenen Kunden, weil es im lokalen
Netz geroutet wird, und auch nur wenn der Kunde hinter seinem NAT nicht
dasselbe Netz nutzt und der NAT Router des Kunden RFC1918 nicht droppt.
Gruss
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G
* Price
That would give a nice overview and facilitate choosing the right one.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 Pratteln
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UWK6ijLCiLXSIuTT4sS_h0zCqPMCjjhry0b
yQprysts/edit?usp=sharing
Nice! exactly what I had in mind :-)
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29
the registrars? Solved by openid or a similar technique?
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 PrattelnFax +41 61 826 93 02
Schweiz
when they get a notification and will re-submit it with
the approval key or password.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 Pratteln
:193.252.23.174 - 193.252.23.183
inetnum:193.252.23.186 - 193.252.23.255
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
Benoit Panizzon
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 07
CH-4133 Pratteln
Hält sich in Grenzen:
# grep postfix-submit /var/log/mail.log | grep relay=mxbw.lb.bluewin.ch | grep
-i bounce | wc -l
64
# grep postfix-submit /var/log/mail.log | grep relay=mxbw.lb.bluewin.ch | grep
-i -v bounce | wc -l
2919
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter
Hi Per
> Does anyone @UPC happen to know what this means:
>
> host mx.hispeed.ch [213.46.255.2]: 552 5.2.0 rl4b1r00p3kCCMl01l4bgK
> automated process detected unsolicited content
>
> The email is being sent from a UPC connection, via Hostpoint
> (mail.hostpoint.ch) to a user @swissonline.ch.
>
Hallo David
> Google hat uebrigens auf "mailop" (eine Mailing-Liste fuer Mail
> Hoster) gesagt, dass es bei ihnen auch passieren kann, dass ganze
> netblocks blockiert werden:
> https://www.mail-archive.com/mailop@mailop.org/msg01042.html
Danke für den Hinweis. Ich versuche seit Monaten das
Hello
One customer contacted us, because the Migros Banking App does not work
from within our network and asked me to contact the Migros NOC to find
out what we should change to make it work.
From the Migros NOC I got the feedback, that this is an issue they
observed with customers whose ISP
Hi Daniel
In the meantime, the Migros APP Support center called me again.
They got in contact with the customer for further investigation in the
problem and think they found the Problem.
The customer has an older ZyXEL WLAN Router with NAT.
The APP apparently uses some kind of ipsec
Hello All
Anyone else running bind9 and seeing a lot of request with permuted
case in the requested resource, which I fear causes bind9 to cache
each reply individually leading to memory exhaustion?
-Benoît-
___
swinog mailing list
> Management of companies need to be convinced. Technical folks
> typically know that they want it, but are not allowed to play with
> it...
Oh, I have heard a lot of tech excuses:
* Why should I bother with IPv6? IPv4 works fine!
* There could be potential security issues with IPv6, so better
Hi
Update on the Problem.
I got two replies, one yesterday stating, that the problem is about our
side, that the UPC servers rotate between 3 IP addresses and this
causes problems with greylisting.
=> Fact: Already last week I told them I see those 3 IP Addresses
from within the same /24 and
Same Problem here, since at least 24. December.
Opened a case today @ UPC. I keep you updated.
--
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter Commerce Kunden
__
Zurlindenstrasse 29 Tel +41 61 826 93 00
CH-4133
Hi
> I do not greylist servers with correct spf record. With UPC i think
> the main problem is the missing NDR.
We also do not greylist if the SPF record matches.
We do not greylist IP's listed in the DNSWL.org or SWINOG
Whitelist either.
But none of this was true for the new 'NL' ranges used
Hi Per
> Is there any point in greylisting genuine mailservers? We only
> greylist dodgy-looking setups.
True, no point in greylisting a propper SMTP engine that does queueing
and would resend the email later in case of a 4XX error.
But how do you find out which ip's to greylist and which not
Quick update on that case.
UPC Switzerland is fully aware of the problem.
The Mail-Platform in the Netherlands is operated by UPC Austria
(probably chello.at). And they still deny that there is a problem
on their side and blame the ISPs that do greylisting.
UPC Switzerland is trying to escalate
Hi Dan
Operating anti-spam blacklists, adding my email address to all kind of
newsletters, online contests etc. apparently is a common revenge from
spamers who get listed. Unfortunately too many ESP operators still don't
understand that 'real' double opt-in would solve the issue.
According to
Dear Swinogers
We use smsd to send our nagios alarms via a GSM usb stick.
I'm looking for some advice after I was not able to find a working
solution.
The mobile operator we use has a somewhat short queue to accept SMS
and when a recipient is not getting the SMS (mobile off during vacation
or
Hello List
A Mailserver from a business customer of ours is blacklisted @ bluewin.
The Error Message from Bluewin MXes directing to the removal site:
https://www.swisscom.ch/en/res/hilfe/ip-blacklist.html
Our customer has requested removal via this form, no success.
Our customer has contacted
Hi Franco and Swinogers
Posting on SWINOG does seem to accelerate problem solving sometimes :-)
Swisscom has contacted our customer, explained and solved the issue.
Apparently the installed a new anti-spam measure short time ago (I
don't know if cloudmark is involved).
They count the number of
Dear Swinogers.
I run a couple of .com and .ch domains, which are registered via
Gandi.net
About one week ago, Gandi activated 'privacy protect' on my .com
domains, hiding all my contact data in the whois output, without me
asking them to do so. They sent an email though, that they would do
so
Hello List
Does anyone know, how bluewin does 'verify' an MX?
The MX of our customer is prefectly reachable for sender verification
but his emails sent 'to' bluewin recipients are getting blocked with:
MAIL FROM: <[scrubbed]@aerni.com> Unable to verify MX-Record for
domain aerni.com
aerni.com
Dear List
Ok, thank you for the replies as they all point out an apparent PTR
Problem, let me reply to the list.
According to my knowledge of the DNS rfcs (I did not look it up
right now).
A Host resource may point to an A record another host resource is
already pointing to. A Host resource
Hi Marcel
> As for the issue at hand: the DNS servers of your customer are (were)
> not properly reachable from our IP ranges or more specifically we are
> (were) unable to get the IPs for ns1.aerni.com or ns2.aerni.com.
> During our investigation this resolution has mostly recovered and we
> are
Hello fellow Swinogers
To exchange emails containing potentially sensitive customer
information with swisscom, we agreed to use PGP encrytped emails.
Now when swisscom is sending an encrypted attachment to us, we get
those MIME Headers:
--=_Part_5064522_1012233884.1518535424993
Am Thu, 9 Aug 2018 10:59:47 +0200
schrieb Claudio Kuenzler :
> Update: Switch just changed something in their routing.
> No packet loss anymore from both source networks.
PING ch.archive.ubuntu.com(frisal.switch.ch (2001:620:0:1002::20)) 56 data bytes
^C
--- ch.archive.ubuntu.com ping statistics
Hi Community
Anyone else experiencing high latency and packetloss towards
ch.archive.ubuntu.com / mirror.switch.ch
IPv4 via SwissIX.
IPv6 via HE.
--- frisal.switch.ch ping statistics ---
99 packets transmitted, 34 received, 65% packet loss, time 99279ms
rtt min/avg/max/mdev =
Hi Team
We have reports of troubles accessing the swinog blacklists.
Did SWINOG change Nameservers lately?
http://www.zonecut.net/dns/?domain=dnsrbl.swinog.ch still points to
switch and saitis and have weird glue record issues.
whois show cyon operating the swinog.ch DNS Servers and there the
> whois show cyon operating the swinog.ch DNS Servers and there the glue
> records look right.
Uhm, die cyon delete the glue records right now? I contacted the
hostmaster ser...@cyon.ch about the issue.
Mit freundlichen Grüssen
-Benoît Panizzon-
--
I m p r o W a r e A G-Leiter
Hi List
I wonder if a tech from IncaMail Swiss Post (sender:
swissp...@im.post.ch) source: gw1.incamail.com [194.41.147.13] is on
this list and could contact me off-list to check on something?
I contacted their abuse desk and support, regarding excessive bounce
generation, probably due to some
Hi Oli
> The most likely reason:
> Bind 9.11 enables EDNS cookies by default, but the authoritative
> servers for this domain do not handle EDNS correctly:
>
> https://ednscomp.isc.org/ednscomp/b01039e111
>
> quick fix:
> server NSNAME { send-cookie no; };
That was the cause and the fix.
Hi List
Usually I have no problems identifying DNSSEC issues, but I don't get
this one.
Our two main caching DNS Servers run bind 9.11.2-P1, after flushing
the cache and even restarting still see an issue with this domain:
09-Apr-2018 09:28:25.934 no valid RRSIG resolving
Dear List
We sometimes get requests from business customers, with own mailserver,
which directly receives email via smtp, for an outgoing smtp-relay.
I then argue with:
* Their server is absolutely capable of sending emails directly
* They have better control of the sending process.
* They can
Hi List
I have read:
https://nakedsecurity.sophos.com/2012/01/25/smartphone-website-telephone-number/
And I have sniffed the traffic between my swisscom mobile Samsung
Mobile and my Website, but can't find any of the additional headers
disclosing my phone number.
Is there a trick to make a
Hello List
We have some issues with emails sent from the kpt.ch online plattform
over Swisscom Mobile IP Range:
inetnum:138.188.0.0 - 138.188.255.255
netname:Swisscom-Mobile
country:CH
There is no SPF entry and the sending ip addresses are not listed by
dnswl.org nor the
1 - 100 von 147 matches
Mail list logo