Ivo De Broeck wrote:
Bij het updaten van de wiki kwam ik de verloren
pagina WikiProject_Belgium/Chapter tegen. Het lijkt mij een zeer goed idee
en vraag me af dat we dit niet best ook realiseren. Graag uw mening op
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Talk:WikiProject_Belgium/Chapter
Check de
2010/8/4 Ivo De Broeck ivo.debro...@gmail.com
OK why can we not start the vzw?
As Ben said: there is no need for it.
--
wannes
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-be
ik zag talk-be niet in de To-lijst, dus forward ik het eerste antwoord van Ivo
bij deze:
---
Forwarded message:
---
Ben,
Bedankt voor de
Hi!
Is there somewhere a documentation about which data model is actually used by
OSeaM?
For hours, I searched through the wiki and I also downloaded some parts of the
map using Josm to find out which tags are actually being used.
The wiki list several different data models and this is
I'm missing the attribution of OSM data on the maps of nearmap -
am I wrong or shouldn't it mention OSM on the map itself?
On nearmap I only see the attribution after clicking Terms of Use...
Roman
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 3:45 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
Ben Last wrote:
the edits that we're submitting all come from one user
(that represents NearMap) since we don't (and can't) require
users of our site to all be registered with OSM.
Whenever it has been raised in
I guess you mean: http://www.nearmap.com/
They are not using OpenStreetMap, apparently they're using the closed
version: StreetMap
Nice website though!
Greetings,
Floris Looijesteijn
Roman Neumüller wrote:
I'm missing the attribution of OSM data on the maps of nearmap -
am I wrong or
Ben Last wrote:
I'm not sure I agree. We don't want to put barriers in the way of an
average user (and I use that term to explicitly distinguish between
the average map site user and a mapping enthusiast) making simple
corrections such as adding address information or naming un-named
streets.
Frederik Ramm wrote:
I kind of understand your situation but I think the way forward would be
to either use OpenStreetBugs or set up an OpenStreetBugs like system
yourself, maybe integrate that in your editor - so that users without an
OSM account can only place OSB markers, and those (the
2010/8/4 Roman Neumüller r.neumul...@gmail.com:
I'm missing the attribution of OSM data on the maps of nearmap -
am I wrong or shouldn't it mention OSM on the map itself?
On nearmap I only see the attribution after clicking Terms of Use...
And this is bad because...?
Is there any rules how
It's credited in the same place as all the copyrights and credits are listed:
http://www.nearmap.com/legal/copyright
http://www.nearmap.com/legal/terms-of-use
You'll find it close to the section where we make it clear you can use
our photomaps to derive work under CC-BY-SA... for example, to
On 4 August 2010 15:06, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Maybe worth taking a clue from Cloudmade here, who have a similar situation
with their Mapzen editor - they go through some effort to make the process
as painless as possible for their users while still requiring them to
register
Anthony,
The way I like to think of this is: If you speak to another mapper later that day,
and they ask you what
you've been up to? and you answer them in one sentence - that's what you
should put as a changeset
comment.
Sounds like a better place for that would be a diary entry.
If
Ben Last wrote:
In particular ODbL+CT will require a contractual relationship
(i.e. the contributor terms) between OSMF and the user. If
you are not exposing the user to the sign-up process, they
are not agreeing to this contract.
No, they're agreeing to terms and conditions with us. We
Ben Last wrote:
More seriously, though, this question has already been raised, and we
follow the guidelines at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Legal_FAQ#I_would_like_to_use_OpenStreetMap_maps._How_should_I_credit_you.3F
and credit OpenStreetMap in the same way and with the same
should typically != must :)
But the key point is that we attribute OSM with the same prominence as
we do any other supplier. You'll note that there is no copyright
message relating to the photomaps on the main page (for us, or any
supplier).
Cheers
b
On 4 August 2010 16:32, Richard Fairhurst
Hi,
Heiko Jacobs wrote:
I searched without success in the Wiki
who official decided, when and *WHY* they decided, that data of
contributors, who not (can) accept the ODbl, has to be removed.
The formal decision for OSMF to go on with the ODbL relicensing process
was the result of a vote
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 08:53, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
should typically != must :)
But the key point is that we attribute OSM with the same prominence as
we do any other supplier. You'll note that there is no copyright
message relating to the photomaps on the main page (for us,
Ben,
Ben Last wrote:
I'm pretty certain there was some kind of web-based tag editor just before
OAuth was finally set up but I cannot find the mailing list references.
There wasn't a huge discussion back then - it was clear to everyone that
what that editor was doing could be a proof of concept
Bernhard,
The OpenSeaMap data model definitions are contained in three files:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tonne/Datenmodell
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bake/Datenmodell
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Leuchtfeuer/Datenmodell
You will note that all the key/value pairs
Hi,
Heiko Jacobs wrote:
I'm still searching the former decision (of LWG or any other)
that the removal of data is mandatory and WHY it is on which legal
base of copyright, CC or anything other.
I don't think that there is any decision necessary. CC-BY-SA says data
must only be distributed
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:57 AM, woll w...@2-islands.com wrote:
Better to keep this thread restricted to the subject of is it valid to tag
names with postfixes, and have any technical discussions separately in the
trac report!
Yes - it was probably a mistake to reference the ticket in this
I take back my earlier comments, apparently it is ok to have it behind a
link. Another website you might know also has it like this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/
If you could also fix the StreetMap and OpenStreetMaps texts this website
will be a excellent addition to OSM.
Greetings,
Floris
2010/8/4 Brian Quinion openstreet...@brian.quinion.co.uk
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 2:57 AM, woll w...@2-islands.com wrote:
Better to keep this thread restricted to the subject of is it valid to
tag
names with postfixes, and have any technical discussions separately in
the
trac report!
Yes
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:00 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
80n wrote:
Does anyone know whether the code exists to do this yet?
I doubt it.
How are way splits handled (only one half of the way will have a full
Andrzej,
You kind of have a point there with addresses and all; assume you'd just
produce your very own database of house numbers built by your users, then
release that, say, as PD or CC0. It would only be days until someone in OSM
came along and proposed to import your database into OSM, which
On 04/08/2010 15:34, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
Let's try not to subject OSM data users to death by a thousand
self-appointed license nitpickers.
Self-appointed license nitpickers. Geez, I do love that quote. Can I
use from time to time?
--
Iván Sánchez Ortega i...@sanchezortega.es
Let's try not to subject OSM data users to death by a thousand
self-appointed license nitpickers.
Mapquest, Microsoft and now Nearmap; whenever anybody tries to do
anything with OSM, there's always a license / attribution backlash.
It's really sad, but hopefully largely ignored outside the world
On 4 August 2010 14:34, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ava...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:53, Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu wrote:
snipped
Let's try not to subject OSM data users to death by a thousand
self-appointed license nitpickers.
+1
The negative attitude to nearmap is
Kevin Peat wrote:
chop chop
The negative attitude to nearmap is unjustified. It would be nice to see
more businesses use the data and contribute back to the project in a
responsible way as they are trying to do.
I did not mean to sound that negative, I'm indeed no native English speaker.
I
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Joseph Reeves wrote:
Let's try not to subject OSM data users to death by a thousand
self-appointed license nitpickers.
Mapquest, Microsoft and now Nearmap; whenever anybody tries to do
anything with OSM, there's always a license / attribution backlash.
It's really sad, but
Hi,
On 4 August 2010 15:47, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
You kind of have a point there with addresses and all; assume you'd just
produce your very own database of house numbers built by your users, then
release that, say, as PD or CC0. It would only be days until someone in
OSM
On 04/08/2010 16:17, Stefan de Konink wrote:
Do you really think that the OSMF tries to sue? Given their biggest
license debate stuff is currently 'the license is not appropriate'?
Hey, we'd sue the ass off Nike if they didn't have a litigation
department. And if we could actually enforce the
On 4 August 2010 15:13, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's look at it practically. If a proxy (e.g. nearmap) user commits
vandalism, there are several things OSM may want to do: 1. undo the
vandalism, 2. contact the user, 3. block the user.
For 1. it's actually better that
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
Worst case it becomes factual data, protected by some local laws or
european dirrective. Sadly the fud is indeed the main issue.
Hey, if the USGS can take over OSM in the US and make it public domain, don't
expect me to exactly cry all over it
Do you really think that the OSMF tries to sue? Given their biggest
license debate stuff is currently 'the license is not appropriate'?
Worst case it becomes factual data, protected by some local laws or
european dirrective. Sadly the fud is indeed the main issue.
+1
Even protected, no one
On 04/08/2010 19:01, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Let's create a fund to pay for license related legal action ;))
After all it is so sad having a license and not be able
to enforce it !
Who is willing to contribute, say 5 dollars, to pay some lawyersjust
in case.
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
On 04/08/2010 19:01, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Let's create a fund to pay for license related legal action ;))
After all it is so sad having a license and not be able
to enforce it !
Who is willing to contribute,
2010/8/4 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Iván Sánchez Ortega wrote:
On 04/08/2010 19:01, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen wrote:
Let's create a fund to pay for license related legal action ;))
After all it is so sad having a license and not be able
2010/8/4 Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Ian Dees wrote:
Wait, how did the thread about NOT nitpicking over licensing issues turn
into a donate so we can hire lawyers to nitpick thread?
Probably because some people instead of doing something with our data (like
big
Maybe because you missed the irony ?
If you scare the users of our data away by hiring lawyers to nitpick
over how OSM is represented
in every which way then there's really no point in collecting all this
data, is there
+1
So get rid of any license, as a license without lawyers, is of
On 25 July 2010 20:56, David Earl da...@frankieandshadow.com wrote:
My two talks for State of the Map
* Tag Central - a schema for OpenStreetMap
* What I learned making a real map on real paper for real people and real
money
are now available online at
On Wednesday 04 August 2010 12:58:13 Malcolm Herring wrote:
Bernhard,
The OpenSeaMap data model definitions are contained in three files:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Tonne/Datenmodell
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Bake/Datenmodell
On Wed, 4 Aug 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Prolific editors don't tend to restrict their activity to a single
location. This might be more widespread than anticipated.
Prolific editors also tend not to leave the project in a huff.
No, they continue to make noise before they do.
Fairly interesting improvement on the 'street view bubble' from Microsoft
http://flowingdata.com/2010/08/04/browse-street-side-with-microsoft-street-slide/
Simon
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
I doubt it, because there weren't any contributor terms before that.
I told him that before we had the contributor terms, there was a note on
the signup page saying, in effect, that by signing up you agree that all
data you upload is placed under CC-BY-SA.
Indeed.
On Thu, 5 Aug 2010, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Liz,
Since 80n has mooted this deadline some time ago, and only now you
consider it, of course you think it is quite short.
80n first mentioned this deadline on 14th July, i.e. at the time that
was six weeks.
It was unclear to me what exactly
I'm slightly confused by all this talk about needing contractual
agreements with all the end users and the OSM-F, or needing to
identify Nearmap users to OSM-F.
OSM already has data in the database from other projects, which was
community sourced and licensed under various cc-by style licenses,
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:53 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
I'm slightly confused by all this talk about needing contractual
agreements with all the end users and the OSM-F, or needing to
identify Nearmap users to OSM-F.
OSM already has data in the database from other
On 5 August 2010 08:02, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
I think the point that Frederik was trying to make was that this model
(bulk imported in real time) is not ideal. Ideally, we want the users
interacting directly with the OSM API rather than going through some
intermediary service.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 4:58 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
We can simply decide to re-license, then ask everyone to agree, then
disallow contributions from people who haven't agreed. All the time, the
planet is still under CC-BY-SA. Then we evaluate the losses. Say we find
that
On 5 August 2010 08:25, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
Who cares if that time is one year in the future?
Who cares if that time is never?
I'm guessing those that are more pragmatic and would like to be not
redoing 20% or more of the work already mapped so they fork and move
on with their lives
As long as the user is traceable, contactable and blockable (by
Nearmap), and that user is clearly reminded not to copy data off other
maps, then I'd let them get on with it.
Richard
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 11:20 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5 August 2010 08:02, Ian Dees
On 4 August 2010 16:27, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
The major problem arises when, for example, a NearMap user starts correcting
300 street names using Google Maps as a source
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/blocks/10); or they make a whole bunch of
fictitious corrections a la
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:20 PM, Ben Last ben.l...@nearmap.com wrote:
It's somewhat
frustrating to find this being immediately classified in the same box
as anonymous editing and/or vandalism.
I wanted to make it clear that I'm ecstatic to finally see a simple map
editor coming out. I look
On 5 August 2010 09:02, Ian Dees ian.d...@gmail.com wrote:
So let's talk about making that process easier instead of using the current
broken system.
Here we have Nearmap willing to spend time, money and other resources
to address the issue and you want to waste further resources to
discuss
2010/8/4 MorSi mo...@inwind.it:
Io con amenity=shelter ho taggato anche questa struttura in legno usata per
le manifestazioni (1).
E' corretto??
non mi sembra propriamente uno shelter... io l'avrei taggato
semplicemente come teatro, aggiungendo opportuni tag (di cui non ho
idea) per
Il 04 agosto 2010 07:15, Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto
lorenzetto.l...@gmail.com ha scritto:
non mi sembra propriamente uno shelter... io l'avrei taggato
semplicemente come teatro, aggiungendo opportuni tag (di cui non ho
idea) per segnalare che e' all'aperto
+1
ciao
Luca
Il 03 agosto 2010 21:28, Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com ha scritto:
2010/8/3 Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto lorenzetto.l...@gmail.com:
Alla fine poi quella proposta e' andata in votazione?
Non mi sembra, ma direi che noi italiani abbiamo sufficiente forza
d'urto per taggare tutti i bivacchi
Il 03 agosto 2010 18:51, Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Il 03 agosto 2010 17:38, Simone Saviolo simone.savi...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Io l'ho sempre inteso come mappa che puoi far scivolare,
contrapposta a quella a tile accessibile su t...@h.
scusa ma non capisco, come
Il 03 agosto 2010 23:36, gvf g...@gvf.ve.it ha scritto:
Il giorno gio, 29/07/2010 alle 14.30 +0200, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Ciao,
sto traducendo il template del Map Status [1] . Se ho tempo farò anche
un giro sulle pagine che lo usano per usare la versione localizzata;
se qualcuno di voi
Il 03 agosto 2010 23:42, gvf g...@gvf.ve.it ha scritto:
Il giorno ven, 30/07/2010 alle 10.30 +0200, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Ho tradotto (almeno per la parte comunemente usata) il template Place
[1] . Ricordo inoltre a chi si è registrato sul wiki di includersi
nelle categorie di
2010/8/4 Luca Delucchi lucadel...@gmail.com:
Non mi sembra, ma direi che noi italiani abbiamo sufficiente forza
d'urto per taggare tutti i bivacchi italiani (una 50ina solo in Val
d'Aosta), oltre a amenity=shelter, anche tourism=basic_hut
+1, ovviamente il mio tempo per farlo è veramente
On 8/4/10, Silvio silvio...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Confesso di averci pensato, ma non per una questione di campanilismo:
preferirei utilizzare un metodo più internazionale.
[...]
Devo dire che invece per le mie zone preferisco la scala svizzera, che
permette bene o male di dare indicazioni
On 8/3/10, Daniele Forsi dfo...@gmail.com wrote:
scrollabile no di sicuro :-) lo Zingarelli dice che scrollare vuol
dire scuotere con forza e siccome non è solo scorrevole perché si
può cambiare l'ingrandimento, userei qualcosa tipo mappa interattiva
anche la mappa in cui ci si muove di un
Ciao Federico,
Il 03 agosto 2010 21:59, Federico Cozzi f.co...@gmail.com ha scritto:
2010/8/3 Gian-Paolo gianpaolo.pall...@gmail.com:
Non ho mai provato bigmap ma credo che la qualità dei formati
vettoriali (pdf o svg) sia preferibile per la stampa.
Differenza purtroppo inesistente se
2010/8/4 Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com:
On 8/4/10, Silvio silvio...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
Confesso di averci pensato, ma non per una questione di campanilismo:
preferirei utilizzare un metodo più internazionale.
[...]
Devo dire che invece per le mie zone preferisco la scala
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 10.12 +0200, Elena of Valhalla ha
scritto:
Devo dire che invece per le mie zone preferisco la scala svizzera, che
permette bene o male di dare indicazioni anche dal lato basso del
range di difficolta`: mappando il parco del campo dei fiori (Varese)
e` utile
On 8/4/10, Silvio silvio...@gmail.com wrote:
A mio avviso la scala svizzera (0) e quella italiana (1) sostanzialmente
corrispondono per i primi 4 gradi.
[...]
da ignorante, leggendo Può prevedere facili passaggi in roccia, non
esposti e che comunque non richiedono conoscenze alpinistiche
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 09.31 +0200, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Se ho capito bene quello che
dici, usando Template:Map_status (senza specificare una lingua), avrei
automaticamente la versione localizzata solo se la localizzazione
fosse in Template:It-Map_status?
No, dico che per
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 09.33 +0200, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Il 03 agosto 2010 23:42, gvf g...@gvf.ve.it ha scritto:
Il giorno ven, 30/07/2010 alle 10.30 +0200, Simone Saviolo ha scritto:
Ho tradotto (almeno per la parte comunemente usata) il template Place
[1] . Ricordo inoltre a
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 13.58 +0200, Elena of Valhalla ha
scritto:
da ignorante, leggendo Può prevedere facili passaggi in roccia, non
esposti e che comunque non richiedono conoscenze alpinistiche
specifiche. e si svolge su sentiero difficile ed anche fuori pista
a me sembra che la E
On 8/4/10, Silvio silvio...@gmail.com wrote:
Tra l'altro non ho capito dove hai letto la seconda frase che parla di
fuori pista.
qui, in uno dei tre link della mail a cui rispondevo
http://www.ilportalesardo.it/outdoor/escursioni/gradi.htm
A parte questo il T3 della SAC
E gia` che si parla di autostrade...
i punti blu come si taggano? shop=?
--
Elena ``of Valhalla''
homepage: http://www.trueelena.org
email: elena.valha...@gmail.com
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Elena of Valhalla
elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote:
E gia` che si parla di autostrade...
i punti blu come si taggano? shop=?
I punti blu quelli dove chiedi informazioni e assistenza su telepass
co? io li classificherei come degli info point, pero' non so il tag
On 8/4/10, Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto lorenzetto.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 5:42 PM, Elena of Valhalla
elena.valha...@gmail.com wrote:
i punti blu come si taggano? shop=?
I punti blu quelli dove chiedi informazioni e assistenza su telepass
co? io li classificherei come
2010/8/4 gvf g...@gvf.ve.it:
Visto che ci sono circa 8000 pagine di comuni da creare pensavo ad una
soluzione se non completamente automatica almeno semiautomatica
ricavando i limiti del box dai confini dei comuni presenti in database.
Si otterebbe una cosa più precisa senza dover afre
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 12.53 +0100, Luca Delucchi ha scritto:
Il 04 agosto 2010 12:28, Silvio silvio...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Se può servire, posso provare a fare una tabella di comparazione su cui
discutere (ma non mi pare che l'argomento interessi molte persone, o
sbaglio?).
Ciao
Guardando le autostrade della mia zona ho notato che mancava il tag
toll=yes quando applicabile, anche sulle autostrade facili (ad esempio
A26, contrapposte ad A8 e A9 con le barriere, che son casini :D ):
sbaglio o andrebbero aggiunti?
per ora l'ho fatto sulle due autostrade di cui sopra,
Il 04 agosto 2010 18:00, Elena of Valhalla elena.valha...@gmail.com
ha scritto:
secondo me e` piu` un negozio che un info point
+1
--
Elena ``of Valhalla''
ciao
Luca
___
Talk-it mailing list
Talk-it@openstreetmap.org
2010/8/4 Silvio silvio...@gmail.com:
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 12.53 +0100, Luca Delucchi ha scritto:
Il 04 agosto 2010 12:28, Silvio silvio...@gmail.com ha scritto:
Se può servire, posso provare a fare una tabella di comparazione su cui
discutere (ma non mi pare che l'argomento
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 21.26 +0200, Luca 'remix_tj' Lorenzetto
ha scritto:
Non e' molto chiaro perche' il T6 e' equiparato a PD (che mi sembra
significare Poco Difficile).
EEA poi, secondo me, vista la definizione:
Itinerario che conduce l’alpinista su pareti rocciose o su aeree
.
Ok, ci ho provato: ecco una prima versione
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Silviopen/tabellasentieri
...
___
Ecco, ora inizia il balletto delle interpretazioni, speriamo di concludere
qualcosa :-)
EEA mi pare sia riferito
Il 04 agosto 2010 21:41, ale_z...@libero.it ale_z...@libero.it ha scritto:
.
Ok, ci ho provato: ecco una prima versione
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/User:Silviopen/tabellasentieri
...
___
Ecco, ora inizia il balletto delle
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 21.41 +0200, ale_z...@libero.it ha
scritto:
Ecco, ora inizia il balletto delle interpretazioni, speriamo di concludere
qualcosa :-)
:-)) Sono d'accordo, ma proviamo a trovare la quadra
EEA mi pare sia riferito sempre a ferrate, o comunque tratti attrezzati;
Il giorno mer, 04/08/2010 alle 21.41 +0200, ale_z...@libero.it ha
scritto:
EEA mi pare sia riferito sempre a ferrate, o comunque tratti attrezzati;
questi tratti poi possono essere banali o difficili ma rimane sempre EEA; per
questo motivo non lo vedo comparabile alla scala T.
Dimenticavo:
Martin e Napo, mi venite in mente solo voi, ma chiunque è il
benvenuto; quando avete tempo potreste gentilmente tradurre questa
pagina [0]?
ciao
Luca
[0] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:HowtoMinutelyHstore
PS
Martin siete dei maledetti, non potreste scrivere anche la traduzione
in inglese
volevo chiedere che fine hanno fatto i video di osmit ;-), una parte
dovrebbe averla l'amico di Ale (ale hai info al riguardo?) l'altra
Vito Gerado, dovevamo vedere se metterla sul sito dell'università; da
entrambi mi servirebbe sapere quant'è la dimensione totale del file o
se è possibile
Richard Weait schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 7:18 PM, Heiko Jacobs heiko.jac...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello
I searched without success in the Wiki
who official decided, when and *WHY* they decided, that data of
contributors, who not (can) accept the ODbl, has to be removed.
In
Hello
First thanks a lot for some unknown (and known) interesting pages.
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
That again referenced the implementation plan at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Database_License/Implementation_Plan
Which, under the What do we do with people who have said no or not
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
3. Each element is examined and only those with an unbroken history chain
from version 1 to the most recent ODbL'ed version are marked as OK.
Does anyone know whether the code exists to do this yet?
How are way
Frederik Ramm schrieb:
Heiko Jacobs wrote:
I'm still searching the former decision (of LWG or any other)
that the removal of data is mandatory and WHY it is on which legal
base of copyright, CC or anything other.
I don't think that there is any decision necessary. CC-BY-SA says data
must
On 04/08/10 12:06, Frederik Ramm wrote:
I also still searching archived versions of old (pre double
licensing) versions of contribution terms. You answered it in
talk-de citing a small sentence but with a preceding I guess ...
An archive without guess would be fine ;-)
You should be able to
Hi,
80n wrote:
Does anyone know whether the code exists to do this yet?
I doubt it.
How are way splits handled (only one half of the way will have a full
history)?
I think they can be auto-detected (i.e. where in one changeset, one way
suddenly loses some nodes and another springs up
On 4 August 2010 21:48, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Any such mechanism, in my eyes, need not be 100% perfect; it is sufficient
to make a honest attempt at doing the right thing, and if a few things slip
through, then fix them in case of complaints.
Which goes against the usual OSM
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:20 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.orgwrote:
3. Each element is examined and only those with an unbroken history
chain from version 1 to the most recent ODbL'ed version are marked as OK.
Does anyone
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Any such mechanism, in my eyes, need not be 100% perfect; it is sufficient
to make a honest attempt at doing the right thing, and if a few things slip
through, then fix them in case of complaints.
Which goes against the usual OSM policy of rejecting it if unsure,
rather
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
Any such mechanism, in my eyes, need not be 100% perfect; it is
sufficient
to make a honest attempt at doing the right thing, and if a few things
slip
through, then fix them in case of
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 12:48 PM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Hi,
80n wrote:
Does anyone know whether the code exists to do this yet?
I doubt it.
How are way splits handled (only one half of the way will have a full
history)?
I think they can be auto-detected (i.e.
On 4 August 2010 14:00, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
The whole relicensing effort would be a bit of a non-starter if this
deletion process cannot be done.
During late 2008 and early 2009 a user inappropriately imported (and
amend existing OSM data) into OSM for Lithuania from what was strongly
1 - 100 of 224 matches
Mail list logo
