On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:19 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'd recommend setting up the draft bylaws prior to making the decision of
where to incorporate. How we want to run the organization will help
determine where (and whether) to incorporate.
Right, as otherwise the locality dictates
All,
Shawn Britton will be hosting a Hike Mapping Party on Sunday Oct 25th in
Gilroy.
More details here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Gilroy_Mapping_Party
Cheers,
Sarah
___
Talk-us-bayarea mailing list
Talk-us-bayarea@openstreetmap.org
Koje bi sve POI (Point Of Interest) interesantne za turiste trebalo stavit na
gradsku kartu?
hvala,
joža
___
Talk-hr mailing list
Talk-hr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-hr
Eugene
Get in touch with me directly if you want access.
There's lots of potential ways to implement reports that are not placed on the
map, for review and placement by moderators. Could involve changes to the
model, or just changes to the code. Happy to discuss that with you .. grab me
on IM
Since the recent storms, I felt that the mapping party should be postponed to a
latter date, preferably between November 2009 and January 2010. Some of our
OSMers should need more time to recover from the damage that Ondoy and Peping
brought to our shores.
Weekends for November 2009 - January
I haven't been there since May. Speaking of Laguna Lake (or places near it),
Santa Cruz, Laguna is underwater as of the moment. I presume that Hsing is okay.
--- On Mon, 10/5/09, maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com wrote:
From: maning sambale emmanuel.samb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re:
On 10/5/09, Laurence Penney l...@lorp.org wrote:
It seemed clear that such data extractions would not be considered
public domain, simply by virtue of having no grid reference or lat-
long. They were part of MasterMap, hence regarded as chargeable data.
that's the suck-'em-dry licensing model
Joseph Booker wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:02:05 +1100
Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Joseph Booker wrote:
Not sure if you are trolling or just
not aware of the wiki, but I'll give the benefit of the doubt and
assume the latter.
I wouldn't say that this guy is trolling at
Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
OSM is a community of volunteers. So neither bureaucracy or
dictatorship is probably the way to go. I would guess that forking
off a “tagging” mail group with a strict “keep-to-topic” policy
would be the way to proceed.
I've asked for a tagging mailing list to be
On Mon, October 5, 2009 15:36, Lester Caine wrote:
snip
( Egil - a little aside, while a check box for boolean would be nice,
there is still an element of 'NULL' - that is in addition to setting a
boolean tag, one still needs to decide if it should or should not be
present )
Checkboxes these
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:24 AM, Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com wrote:
Matt Amos writes:
forcing all mappers, editors and renderers to support it?
Why do people keep saying that I want to use force? From where do
they get this idea? Have I ever suggested the use of force? Gun,
knife,
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 4:10 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 12:58 AM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Richard Fairhurst wrote:
Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
For starters if the maintainers of JOSM Potlatch and Merkaartor encouraged
the
Andrew Errington wrote:
On Mon, October 5, 2009 15:36, Lester Caine wrote:
snip
( Egil - a little aside, while a check box for boolean would be nice,
there is still an element of 'NULL' - that is in addition to setting a
boolean tag, one still needs to decide if it should or should not be
2009/10/4 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
I'd go for b) for all the reasons mentioned above
+1
another issue is the size. If you try to do statistics based on the
areas of certain landuse, you would want them to be their real size
(as precise as possible) and not size= area size - (roadlength
I see on exeption though: areas that are pedestrian areas
(highway=pedestrian, area=yes). In this case I'd like to connect the
pedestrian area (if there is no other limit like a wall, fence, hedge,
etc.) to the linear highway (for routing and rendering issues),
especially, when the pedestrian area
On 05/10/2009 00:12, Egil Hjelmeland wrote:
As a mapper, I want a much more structured, well defined tagging scheme.
Steve started a discussion on the dev list in which I proposed just such
a scheme/schema. Since there's been several discussions on talk healding
in this direction, I'll send it
2009/10/5 Andrew Errington a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk:
On Mon, October 5, 2009 15:36, Lester Caine wrote:
snip
( Egil - a little aside, while a check box for boolean would be nice,
there is still an element of 'NULL' - that is in addition to setting a
boolean tag, one still needs to decide
A few updates to footnav, the 3D OSM visualisation tool aimed at
countryside (and eventually mobile, in the field) use.
The main development is that it will now read in OSM data and overlay it
on the SRTM data, using bilinear interpolation. This mostly works, but
there are issues to do with
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I see on exeption though: areas that are pedestrian areas
(highway=pedestrian, area=yes). In this case I'd like to connect the
pedestrian area (if there is no other limit like a wall, fence, hedge,
etc.) to the linear highway (for routing and rendering issues),
2009/10/5 Egil Hjelmeland pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no:
Every key should be assigned a type (or class). Could be:
- boolean
- enumeration
- numeric
- string
- free text.
Boolean is yes/no. Editor tools should present a Boolean key as a checkbox.
there is IMHO no boolean values in OSM. Feel
2009/10/5 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
I was examining the map for the part of town where I work, and noticed that a
former hospital (now commercial offices) was still labeled as a hospital.
Google Maps, Yahoo Maps, and Blackberry Maps have that same out-of-date
information. What
I'm seeking advice as to best practice in the following type of situation:
As an increasingly common example, now that people are getting around to
mapping areas such as leisure=, natural= and landuse= ...
Consider the case of landuse=farm on one side of a highway (say a
secondary road)
David Earl david at frankieandshadow.com writes:
I think it would be really helpful to bring together the tag definitions
into one place, *in the database and API itself*. I mean a complete
schema: the tags, their possible values, their descriptions (in multiple
languages), their equivalences
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there is IMHO no boolean values in OSM. Feel free to give counter
examples.
The arguments for how to tag a footway and a cycleway contain a number of
boolean examples.
Either you are permitted to drive a car down the footway, or you are not.
You
2009/10/4 Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com:
...that he's conducting bizarre breeding
experiments on cute little animals. Basically, SteveC doesn't find
this teasing at all funny.
what's this breeding stuff about? Can anyone point to a relevant page?
Cheers,
Martin
David Earl wrote:
I think it would be really helpful to bring together the tag definitions
into one place, *in the database and API itself*. I mean a complete
schema: the tags, their possible values, their descriptions (in multiple
languages), their equivalences both in other languages and
2009/10/5 Liz ed...@billiau.net:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
there is IMHO no boolean values in OSM. Feel free to give counter
examples.
The arguments for how to tag a footway and a cycleway contain a number of
boolean examples.
Either you are permitted to drive a car
On 05/10/2009 11:43, Lester Caine wrote:
Rather than all these separate elements, tag values should form part of
the tagkey object, and descriptions can be added at any level. I need to
find the link to a good example, but
tag name='barrier' type='value' relevantto='node'
tagvalue
And I think this gets changed as other objects in the database get
changed: freely but consciously. So if there is a new value for shop, it
is a conscious act to add that to the list of values for shop, and to
describe it, not just casually adding it as a tag value.
Let me be quite clear
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 12:25:37 +0100
Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
I think though - we need to define a proper xsl schema wjich can
be used WITH the tag data :(
OK, benefit of the doubt goes out the window at this point. If you are
going to say you hate XML with any credibility,
For a road, we can either choose to map it as a linear object (this is the
common case), or we can map its geometry more exactly by using an area. In
both cases, however, the object in our database represents the entire road
(i.e. not only the middle line). Because in reality, there is no
On Mon, 05 Oct 2009 01:12:41 +0200
Egil Hjelmeland pri...@egil-hjelmeland.no wrote:
I started mapping my local mountain village in Norway a month ago. I
find the fundamental OSM data model very simple and elegant: The
three basic elements (node, way/area, relation), and properties as
For a road, we can either choose to map it as a linear object (this is
the common case), or we can map its geometry more exactly by using an area.
In both cases, however, the object in our database represents the entire
road (i.e. not only the middle line). Because in reality, there is no
2009/10/5 Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net:
But a) could be used as acceptable temporary solution until someone
with better information (like having aerial photography) remaps it as
b)
Yes, this is basically what I wanted to say. Leave it to the mappers whether
they want to use a way or an area
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 11:33 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/4 Russ Nelson nel...@crynwr.com:
...that he's conducting bizarre breeding
experiments on cute little animals. Basically, SteveC doesn't find
this teasing at all funny.
what's this breeding stuff
Hi,
I have one question for turn restrictions gurus :)
Have you used http://keepright.ipax.at site for error checking? I got
a message that turn restriction has no type tag.
I have used wiki for getting to know how to use turn restrictions, and
there the examples given on the page:
russ and i had a useful chat on IRC late last night and i think we've
cleared up the misunderstanding that lies at the root of this thread.
(russ - please correct me if i've misreported anything here).
apologies to anyone who's getting really tired of this thread.
hopefully we're at or near the
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Mon, 5 Oct 2009 15:28:54 +0200
Von: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
An: Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net
CC: MP singular...@gmail.com, talk@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [OSM-talk] Landuse areas etc. abutting highways
2009/10/5 Marc
Valent Turkovic wrote:
I have used wiki for getting to know how to use turn restrictions, and
there the examples given on the page:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:restriction
type tag is not used.
The type tag is listed in the tags section on that page.
The examples were added
I'm sure EGNOS is something else other than the new Euro GPS system,
but I can't for the life of me remember what, something to do with
food and Christmas rings a bell but I can't think what.
Anyway so EGNOS is now available for use.
So what new things can we do with this new available
Peter Childs wrote:
I'm sure EGNOS is something else other than the new Euro GPS system,
but I can't for the life of me remember what, something to do with
food and Christmas rings a bell but I can't think what.
Anyway so EGNOS is now available for use.
So what new things can we do
EGNOS is just another SBAS (Satellite Based Augmentation System), and
with EGNOS 100% active we now have tree such systems, including the
wider known north american WAAS. I hope more such systems can be
available soon, knowing that India and China also are developing
similar systems, and
brgds
Aun Johnsen
On 05/10/2009, at 11:30, Jon Stockill wrote:
Peter Childs wrote:
I'm sure EGNOS is something else other than the new Euro GPS system,
but I can't for the life of me remember what, something to do with
food and Christmas rings a bell but I can't think what.
Anyway
Hmm. I've been happily using it for the past couple of years, on my Garmin
Legend Cx. I can get about 2m stated accuracy when it's working.
Though you're right - it's just been officially announced Ready for Use.
And it's not the new Euro GPS system - that's Galileo.
It's an accuracy augmenter
You're thinking of eggnog - assuming you weren't joking.
PHILLIP BARNETT
SERVER MANAGER
200 GRAY'S INN ROAD
LONDON
WC1X 8XZ
UNITED KINGDOM
T +44 (0)20 7430 4474
F
E phillip.barn...@itn.co.uk
http://WWW.ITN.CO.UK
P Please consider the environment. Do you really need to print this email?
2009/10/5 Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net:
2009/10/5 Marc Schütz schue...@gmx.net:
But a) could be used as acceptable temporary solution until someone
with better information (like having aerial photography) remaps it as
b)
Yes, this is basically what I wanted to say. Leave it to the
Barnett, Phillip wrote:
You can tell when it's working as some of the satellite reception bars will
have a capital D above them.
Is that correct?
I sometimes get the D's displaying even if I have no reception (no bar
showing).
I've got a Garmin GPSmap 60C. Any body else get that quirk?
Yes, I get it sometimes.
I guess the GPS receiver is trying to tell you that you are picking up the
geostationary satellite that's transmitting corrections, and that IF you were
picking up a GPS satellite that is theoretically available according to the
downloaded ephemeris (but you're not
2009/10/5 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Barnett, Phillip wrote:
You can tell when it's working as some of the satellite reception bars will
have a capital D above them.
Is that correct?
I sometimes get the D's displaying even if I have no reception (no bar
showing).
I've got a Garmin
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/10/5 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Barnett, Phillip wrote:
You can tell when it's working as some of the satellite reception bars will
have a capital D above them.
Is that correct?
I sometimes get the D's displaying even if I have no
2009/10/5 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2009/10/5 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
Barnett, Phillip wrote:
You can tell when it's working as some of the satellite reception bars
will have a capital D above them.
Is that correct?
I sometimes get the D's
Strictly true, but effectively they're the same, except for the delivery
mechanism for broadcasting differential corrections - groundbased UHF radio for
DGPS and geostationary satellite broadcast for WAAS/EGNOS.
The D symbol just shows that differential readings are being received.
PHILLIP
Hi
EGNOS delivers a correction Signal.
It's possible to receive it in realtime from a satellite or download
using FTP.
(I think it's here: http://www.egnos-pro.esa.int/ems/index.html)
If the gpx file has an information whether the coordinates are already
corrected, the EGNOS error correction
Hi,
bernhard wrote:
EGNOS delivers a correction Signal.
It's possible to receive it in realtime from a satellite or download
using FTP.
True, but I don't think the correction signal is something like add
.0182 to longitude and subtract .0012 from latitude. It is
rather correct
Hi All,
The voting for landuse=garages is started.
Unfortunanly I am not a native english speaker, so i cannot deside if
'garages' is the best word. Since comments are quite contradictory, i
desided to vote this proposal as it is now. If your think 'garages' is not a
best word, please
El Lunes, 5 de Octubre de 2009, Frederik Ramm escribió:
but unless someone more knowledgeable than myself says otherwise, I'll
assume that in GPS receiver terms, post processing still means
pre-lat-lon-output.
You're correct. I had been working with sub-metric GPS receivers, and what
they
Is there any simple way (i.e. not involving setting up your own Mapnik
server) to test Mapnik rendering locally, without polluting OSM, and
perhaps more importantly, without waiting an hour or more to see your
update.
I'm working on a Virtual-Box image with a complete set up rendering
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Mike N. wrote:
I recently set out to do an all-inclusive map of a section of town.
Perhaps I'm unfortunate enough to live in a city of lawyers, but it seems
that a large entire section of town consists of law offices.I can't
believe I'm not the first person to want to
On 05/10/09 11:04, Dave Stubbs wrote:
As the person whose first came up with a no-names map for London
(well, actually it was a named map of London, turned into a nonames
map on SteveC's suggestion), I have an *official leadership
announcement* to make:
There shall be no tagging of unnamed
You have described an interesting example of the difficulties of wishing
to be
a conformist on OSM and I have described the example of how easy it is to
be
an anarchist.
The only reason for wanting to be a conformist is the possibility for
more meaningful rendering sooner. Currently,
Hi all,
I'm pleased to announce a new mailing list: tagg...@openstreetmap.org .
You can subscribe at:
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
The mailing list description is tag discussion, strategy and related
tools.
The list will enable those who want to discuss tags to do
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net wrote:
I'm pleased to announce a new mailing list: tagg...@openstreetmap.org .
So, we still have to create a what is thinking Frederik list and a
what is not saying SteveC and we can close the main osm-talk list.
Pieren
Mike N. wrote:
So, I've revised my
approach to placing non-rendering shop types on the building outline where
the name= tag will be shown.
If I understand you correctly your mapping/tagging so the name is
displayed along the outline of the shop.
unknown boundaries also do this.
I
So, I've revised my approach to placing non-rendering shop types on the
building outline where the name= tag will be shown.
If I understand you correctly your mapping/tagging so the name is
displayed along the outline of the shop.
I add a building=yes which renders the building
+1
Thanks Richard Fairhurst.
Sam
On 10/5/09, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 12:02 AM, Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
I'm pleased to announce a new mailing list: tagg...@openstreetmap.org .
So, we still have to create a what is thinking Frederik list
Mike N. wrote:
I find it difficult to be a monk who labors away at a mountain of XML
that may see the light some day. I also like to show people what I am
working on - it doesn't need to be fancy, but I also use it to double check
my work. Just as reading your essay in reverse helps
The delay in rendering is irritating but understandable. A sandbox with a
limit of a view ways/areas to allow immediate render would be extremely
useful.
I read somewhere today that someone is working on this - a web site where
you'll be able to designate a bounding rectangle with near
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
The delay in rendering is irritating but understandable. A sandbox with a
limit of a view ways/areas to allow immediate render would be extremely
useful.
I read somewhere today that someone is working on this - a web site
Ian Dees wrote:
I don't see much of a rendering delay with Mapnik... the last few
changesets I've uploaded have shown up on the Mapnik layer within 5
minutes.
I think it depends greatly on the time of day maybe where you are in
the world.
Does anyone know if the servers are all in one
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 8:21 PM, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
Ian Dees wrote:
I don't see much of a rendering delay with Mapnik... the last few
changesets I've uploaded have shown up on the Mapnik layer within 5
minutes.
I think it depends greatly on the time of day maybe
2009/10/6 Gervase Markham gerv-gm...@gerv.net:
On 05/10/09 11:04, Dave Stubbs wrote:
As the person whose first came up with a no-names map for London
(well, actually it was a named map of London, turned into a nonames
map on SteveC's suggestion), I have an *official leadership
announcement*
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
The ABS data isn't very accurate, but it would be accurate enough for
the purpose it was intended which is breaking the country up into
various geographical areas for statistical purposes.
The Qld boundary data seems to be more accurate than GPS in most
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:05:54 +1100
Liz ed...@billiau.net wrote:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, Ross Scanlon wrote:
So PLEASE look at the sat photos and already entered data before you go
removing the coastline and using the ABS data automatically as the
coastline.
another paragraph in the
2009/10/5 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
Just noticed this:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=-20.34647lon=148.95263zoom=16layers=B000FTF
If you then go to edit and zoom in you find:
Two restaurants that are now in the ocean.
The airport road now in the ocean, this is a surveyed road and
As the subject says
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/09/the-300-home-brew-street-view-camera/
--
Cheers
Ross
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
2009/10/5 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
As the subject says
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/09/the-300-home-brew-street-view-camera/
Know of any example pics from that setup, I couldn't find any on that
site or the IEEE site, I'm wondering if it would be good enough to
grab street
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
http://www.wired.com/gadgetlab/2009/09/the-300-home-brew-street-view-camera
/
Know of any example pics from that setup, I couldn't find any on that
site or the IEEE site, I'm wondering if it would be good enough to
grab street names from signs...
yes,
2009/10/5 Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org:
I sent an email today that is waiting administrator approval because it's over
40kB, is there a chance that it will be approved? If not I can host the file
else where and post a link.
It was a 40kB spreadsheet
I can host anything you want almost, just
2009/10/5 Evan Sebire e...@sebire.org:
I've created a spreadsheet that automatically converts columns of ACT grid
data to MGA lat/longs.
A series of co-ords have been checked with g'sat imagery and it appears to be
working good enough for POI use.
The spreadsheet includes a hacked together
On Sun, Oct 4, 2009 at 6:14 PM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/10/5 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
Just one comment. If it was me working on it, i would hesitate on adding
in
roads where they are 'estimated' because it is not known as a fact. Once
all the
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:29 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
2009/10/5 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net:
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009, John Smith wrote:
The ABS data isn't very accurate, but it would be accurate enough for
the purpose it was intended which is breaking the country up
2009/10/5 Sam Vekemans acrosscanadatra...@gmail.com:
That's true. .. so someone who's kind-of familiar with the area (been down
the road at least once in their life?
Some people have better memories than others.
Perhaps maybe the suggestion is to hold off on that planning aspect, or
I've noticed lots of the islands off the Queensland coast have had their
coastlines changed to natural=land.
From the wiki this is incorrect.
natural=land is for Land that exists within another area, such as a lake.
additionally look here:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Bruce Bannerman bruce.bannerman.os...@gmail.com
Date: 2009/10/6
Subject: [Aust-NZ] A Rich Archive Historical Imagery dating back to 1928
To: aust...@lists.osgeo.org
Cc: foss4g2009 foss4g2...@lists.osgeo.org
Dr Martin Woods, Curator of Maps at the
They will render still.
Depends.
Look at informationfreeway.org for this area at zooms less than 12 and you will
see that most of the islands are missing. The roads on Hamilton Island are in
the middle of the water.
--
Cheers
Ross
___
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:22:59 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
They will render still.
Depends.
Look at informationfreeway.org for this area at zooms less than 12 and you
will see that most of the islands are missing. The
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:26:50 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:22:59 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
They will render still.
Depends.
2009/10/6 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:26:50 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:22:59 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/10/6 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
Have a read of this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Coastline
Anything big enough to appear on z9 is most likely going to have more
than 2000 nodes...
That's one reason to use the shape files for the coastlines and if it's not
tagged as natural=coastline when the shape files
2009/10/6 Ross Scanlon i...@4x4falcon.com:
Have a read of this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Coastline
Anything big enough to appear on z9 is most likely going to have more
than 2000 nodes...
That's one reason to use the shape files for the coastlines and if it's not
tagged
Only at z0-9, at least according to the wiki link you posted, not sure
what happens after that, but natural=land will show up at z10-
There are three shape files that can be used, which cover all zoom levels.
They are world_boundaries, coastlines and shorelines.
Also just looking at Lake Eyre
Sorry, the 2 below it, if you zoom in to z10 you can see where Lake
Eyre appears and at z9 it disappears.
Interesting, on openstreetmap.org Lake Eyre appears from z6 whereas on
bigtincan its from z9, so depends on how your osm.xml file is setup for mapnik.
--
Cheers
Ross
On Tue, 6 Oct 2009 15:32:49 +1000
John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Lake Gairdner and Lake Torrens are natural=coastline
Well there both now natural=water as they are both single ways less than 1000
nodes and there's no need for them to be natural=coastline.
--
Cheers
Ross
Hallo.
Am Montag, 5. Oktober 2009 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
1. Wir importieren die PLZ-Gebiete einfach so, wie sie sind (eine
Relation fuer jedes Gebiet, einen Grenz-Way zwischen je zwei Gebieten).
Das geht schnell und unkompliziert
Definitiv dafür.
Ich bin zwar noch gar nicht so sicher, ob ich
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Sun, 4 Oct 2009 15:42:46 +0200
Von: Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
An: Openstreetmap allgemeines in Deutsch talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Betreff: Re: [Talk-de] OSM-talk?
ja, das mit dem Führer fand ich auch äußerst befremdlich, u.a.
Josias Polchau schrieb:
hab ich da was falsch gesehen?
in vielen Deutschen Städten sind Döner-Imbisse kaum eingezeichnet
ich hab mal auf folgendes getestet:
amenity=restaurant
cuisine=kebab
oder
amenity=fast_food
cuisine=kebab
http://osm.youseeus.de/osmolt/doener/
mehrere
Hallo Martin!
Es ist eine Durchfahrt mit einer Durchfahrtsbreite- und -höhe und es
wird finster, wenn man reinfährt (modulo Beleuchtung).
Und ob oben drüber Felsen, eine Straße, Eisenbahngleise, ein Fluß oder
ein Gebäude ist, ist dem, der die Straße/den Weg durch den Tunnel/die
Unterführung/die
Frederik Ramm frederik at remote.org writes:
es gibt da einen Datensatz mit Postleitzahlengebieten in
Deutschland, den wir vielleicht importieren koennen (Lizenzfrage ist
noch nicht so 100% klar, aber sieht gut aus).
Das klingt doch mal sehr schön, dann könnte der ORS evtl. auch auf die
Am 5. Oktober 2009 09:35 schrieb Andreas Labres l...@lab.at:
Hallo Martin!
Es ist eine Durchfahrt mit einer Durchfahrtsbreite- und -höhe und es
wird finster, wenn man reinfährt (modulo Beleuchtung).
Und ob oben drüber Felsen, eine Straße, Eisenbahngleise, ein Fluß oder
ein Gebäude ist, ist
Ich denke wir sollten uns erstmal einigen wie die Postleitzahlen-Grenzen in
OSM eingepflegt werden. Gibt es da schon Tags?
Was machen wir mit Straßen auf denen auf der rechten Seite PLZ 12345 und auf
der linken Seite PLZ 12346. Packen wir dann die Straße auch mit in die
Relation? Taggen wir
1 - 100 of 303 matches
Mail list logo
