On 23/06/2015 16:43, john whelan wrote:
It should probably be dealt with here.
...dealt with my letting everyone know this is a scam and can safely be
ignored.
In any case issues with trademarks need to be dealt with by OSMF since
it would own any OSM-related trademarks that needed
On 04/03/2015 22:59, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Ok, last call for comments.
I don't see a huge amount of support for automatically importing these
from the GB community. If there's such a small number, why not just list
them on this mailing list and local mappers can check the accuracy
before mapping
On 26/02/2015 08:43, Andreas Labres wrote:
This confirmation of course could be automated: show the user the
object with the tags on some areal imagery background and she/he can decide
(in
most cases, I'd say).
No -- the aerial imagery could be out of date, and it may not be
possible to tell
On 25/02/2015 17:23, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Hold on, you may have misunderstood.
Actually I think you've misunderstood:
You've said these are Junk Tags, and I think everyone has agreed with
you on that. However people have also pointed out that they are probably
attached to Junk Data.
This means
On 25/02/2015 07:01, Frederik Ramm wrote:
+1 to all that.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 22/02/2015 12:11, Stefan Keller wrote:
1. Is this OS OpenMap worldwide or UK bound?
Neither. It's GB only -- none of the island of Ireland is included.
2. How does this world-leading digital map look like (map style)?
It doesn't -- it's data only, so needs to be rendered to make a map,
On 27/01/2015 10:24, Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
Have you asked cquest, the editor who created it? They're the best
person to answer this question.
I have a validator or at least addr:interpolation parser, so I have a
lots of examples like this
made by different editors.
So, if it's not an
On 27/01/2015 06:05, Dmitry Kiselev wrote:
Hi everyone.
There is a strange addr:interpolation way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/104241240
Is it a mistake or examples like this may be interpreted in some usable way?
Have you asked cquest, the editor who created it? They're the best
On 20/01/2015 22:34, David Woolley wrote:
That information would be extremely valuable to terrorists. I suspect
that it would allow a small group of people to disrupt phone, mobile
phone and internet communications over large parts of the country for
many days or weeks.
Oh no. I guess if we
On 21/12/2014 14:39, David Woolley wrote:
In my view, they are not really bookmakers. For fixed odds, bookmaking
requires no skill and for the horses, I imagine that all the bookmaking
is done at head office.
I'm not sure this detail is really relevant to us. Apply the Duck Test
-- you go
On 18/12/2014 12:05, Ed Loach wrote:
Perhaps just posting Overpass links and locals manually making the changes
would be better?
I think Ed has hit the nail on the head here. All your mechanical edit
does is correct one tiny part of the mapping, and possibly to no great
effect - it's just
On 05/03/2014 13:42, Richard Z. wrote:
climatic zones
vegetation zones
soil biology
vegetation layers
Are any of these things verifiable? Are they relatively static or do
they change with the weather/season/year-to-year? The main OSM database
only stores relatively permanent features. That's
On 05/03/2014 20:30, Richard Z. wrote:
despite beeing sometimes tricky I still consider it pretty important to know
that a certain area is eg part of the tundra climate, permafrost or monsoon.
...and as I said, five messages ago:
The main OSM database only stores relatively permanent
On 10/02/2014 17:29, Steve Doerr wrote:
Is this an appropriate use of the name tag?
No.
J.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 08/02/2014 10:08, Maarten Deen wrote:
If I try to find the user Frederik Ram, I still won't find you and have
no idea why.
Why would you be trying to find a user with that name? The messaging
system is there to allow mappers to contact each other over edits
they've made, in which case you
On 01/02/2014 21:38, Kevin Peat wrote:
Only for helicopters on race weekends and for sightseeing trips, the runway was
repurposed a few years ago. To complicate things further there is a new
university building on the site so you could add campus to the list of possible
tags.
You're all
Based on the Somerset Levels thread, I've realised someone will probably
try to edit the railway line, station and other bits of Dawlish based on
the storm damage.
Please don't.
Apart from the temporary nature of the damage (Network Rail are
predicting a few weeks to fix the line) there's no
On 06/02/2014 19:25, jonathan wrote:
Too late:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/20413392
Has been edited by a User called Daleks with just 5 edits experience.
Do we reverse?
I'll get DWG to revert it. The username and changeset comment make me
think it's more about mischief than
On 03/12/2013 21:36, Robert Norris wrote:
Normally I visually compare Hants KML (and indeed West Sussex) vs OSM tile
images to identify missing ROWs and then make that a basis to include in a
route for a days out walking or cycling.
This might help:
On 07/08/2013 13:47, Steven Horner wrote:
Thanks I will go with office=probation unless others disagree.
No disagreement, but *please* document what you've used the tag for on
the wiki. Don't bother with the approval process, but do give a brief
description of what a probation office does and
On 25/06/2013 16:48, Mulone Moligiangi wrote:
(Apologies for cross-posting)
Since you don't appear to have cross-posted, I wonder why you're
apologising for it. However, there are plenty of other things that
perhaps you should explain:
* Are you Mulone Moligiangi or Andrea Ballatore?
* Which
On 25/04/2013 16:23, John Baker wrote:
There are always more suitable tags than natural=grass, landuse=grass
being the most obvious
Are you claiming that the land *is used for* grass? That the purpose man
has put that piece of land to is just grass? surface=grass yes,
landcover=grass maybe
On 11/03/2013 21:26, Dudley Ibbett wrote:
Is there a correct answer for this or is it a matter of mapping style?
I am leaning towards using Highway=Service for these and keeping
Highway=Track for tracks that link from fields to farms or roads to
fields (i.e. not from roads to farmyards or
On 23/02/2013 07:24, Robin Paulson wrote:
How do we reconcile relatively permissive use of the OSM database, with
relatively restrictive use of the Open Street Map name? For the moment,
I put to one side Stallman's argument that there is no such thing as
intellectual property [1].
In the same
On 17/02/2013 00:00, Jeffrey Johnson wrote:
Its not that, its convincing my wife to let me be away for 1 week vs 2 :)
Bring her with you!
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 10/01/2013 13:30, John Sturdy wrote:
We could have a keyword convention for indicating the pronunciation
(in various languages) using the International Phonetic Alphabet; for
example, we could supplement name:language=* with
name:language:IPA=*
I did this:
On 08/01/2013 21:31, Rovastar wrote:
My idea is simple can someone add modern social media networks logos/links
to the home page.
As a member of the OSMF Communications Working Group (CWG), I have
perhaps the greatest level of involvement in the various OSM-branded
pages/accounts on various
On 09/01/2013 13:43, Paweł Paprota wrote:
OSM does have an
official Facebook account[1] and official Twitter account
...and an official Google+ page:
https://plus.google.com/+OpenStreetMap
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On 09/01/2013 13:57, Greg Troxel wrote:
Personally, I find it puzzling that open data (and open source) projects
are willing to (as projects) use services with bad data policies and bad
privacy policies. While I wouldn't advocate that OSMF take a position
in the culture battle against such
On 02/10/2012 12:29, woll wrote:
The New York Times has not amended the article, so it still contains the
statement that:
The biggest problem with Apple’s map...is that much of its data appears to
be drawn from OpenStreetMap, a Wikipedia-like service that contains a lot of
incorrect and
On 20/09/2012 12:46, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
It would certainly be helpful if more local communities would have one
of their members amongst the DWG members.
It certainly would -- those local communities who feel they need better
representation should decide amongst themselves who they want to
On 19/09/2012 17:26, Pieren wrote:
So, theoretically, we might have the same issue when tracing from Bing
for instance. Should we use a different account for Bing imagery
contributions as well, just in case we move later to a licence
incompatible with Bing ?
No, because tracing over Bing
On 18/09/2012 13:42, Vincent Privat wrote:
What happened on 15th september looks like an abuse of authority to me,
as this largely exceeds the limits of the mandate given to the DWG. I
expect a clarification from the OSMF board on this point.
OK, if we're playing WikiLawyer pissing games, the
On 13/09/2012 13:30, Gregory wrote:
Other city suggestions (I would still help loads!)?
Although everyone is going to do this, I'd like to suggest Guildford,
where I live. The things is has going for it is:
* less than an hour from both Heathrow and Gatwick for international
attendees.
* 40
On 23/07/2012 23:17, SomeoneElse wrote:
but I'm not actually a cyclist -
Burn the heretic!
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 27/06/2012 23:06, john whelan wrote:
Could someone or a group come up with a more standard set of icons please?
Yes. You could.
If not you, who?
Seriously, having a library of icons matching common OSM features is a
fantastic idea, and I'm sure would be welcomed. It does need someone to
tl;dr: Please tag your local station(s) with platforms=n where n2
I had a conversation with Andy Allan, ooh, ages ago (it was probably at
WhereCampGB in Notts) about his lovely transport layer
(http://osm.org/go/euup98?layers=T) and mentioned it would be great to
see station names at lower
On 16/04/2012 12:26, Barnett, Phillip wrote:
Off -topic ---
Apparently it's not been a good year for bluebells - wrong kind of spring.
The ones in my garden have flowered for the first time in years!
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Further to this, one helpful thing is if everyone makes sure they've
uploaded all their traces to OSM. I know I'm guilty of working from the
trace files locally when mapping, then forgetting to upload them so
other mappers can make use of the data.
That way we're not entirely reliant on OS data
On 24/01/2012 11:22, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I wonder if this kind of tagging should be tolerated. In the wiki I
found no documentation regarding this tag, and therefore this data
seems unusable for most mappers.
Perhaps not, but systematically removing it won't improve anything
(since most
On 08/01/2012 13:49, Michael Collinson wrote:
I find it very easy to replace them with much better since we now
additionally have Bing for position and OS StreetView for names
On this one particular point, use Bing for positioning with caution in
coastal and hilly areas. The parts of Cornwall
On 11/01/2012 10:02, Ed Avis wrote:
OK guys, it's public domain. Enjoy.
Ed,
Thank you, from a mapper whose work doesn't overlap with yours very
much. You've made a lot of contributions over the years, and it's great
that OpenStreetMap can continue to use them.
The licence change process
On 19/12/2011 00:31, Nick Austin wrote:
1) Judging by the status message that Firefox produces they are using
the OSM tile server. Is that allowed?
Yes, and it won't cause a problem. Browser-based applications like this
only request a small number of tiles at a time for the area the user is
On 05/12/2011 21:35, Frans Thamura wrote:
i think must research how to copy the data in weekly basis,
Use Osmosis' replication features:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Osmosis/Detailed_Usage_0.38#Replication_Tasks
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
On 28/11/2011 18:29, SomeoneElse wrote:
The problem with proposed routes is that they don't exist yet and so
the usual on the ground check is difficult.
Then don't map them. Seriously, if these networks aren't at the
implementation stage, there's little point in adding them to OSM. Even
On 21/11/2011 14:10, Václav Řehák wrote:
That's not true anymore. Downloading is disabled by Locus author in
the recent versions and online browsing is limited to a certain number
of tiles per day.
Possibly, but on the Locus web site
(http://www.locusmap.eu/version-1-14-0) there's a big red
On 08/11/2011 11:12, Andy Allan wrote:
The easy-for-mappers-but-maybe-a-bit-computationally-intensive scheme
you're trying to avoid
Colon-delineated key namespaces are the exact opposite of
easy-for-mappers,
Sorry if I wasn't clear -- I wasn't necessarily referring to colons and
On 05/11/2011 21:48, Graham Jones wrote:
I know that tagging for the renderer is frowned upon, but I really do
not like all these colons in key names, because (as far as I know) that
means having an extra column in the database produced by osm2pgsql for
renderingand every time I want to add
On 03/11/2011 14:22, Ed Loach wrote:
Wasn’t Ted Pottage out of Postman Pat?
No, that's Ted Glen.
I'll get me coat.
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 26/10/2011 14:27, Robert Scott wrote:
If they're using our server capacity, the least we can ask is for attribution
etc.
Whatever licence the tiles are released under, the Tile usage policy is
unlikely to change:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tile_usage_policy
J.
On 23/09/2011 13:22, thomas van der veen wrote:
Is there a good trick I am missing?
Yes. Merkaartor's Axis align tool. :)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 11/12/2010 16:27, Brian Prangle wrote:
Here's a challenge and probably more of an ethical one than a physical
one. The installation of these by west Midlands Police in Birmingham
has caused a stir in the news. Should we attempt to map them? Despite
their being installed in 31 US cities
On 08/12/2010 14:35, Maarten Deen wrote:
I have never heard of this before and have never seen it documented
anywhere or seen discussed before. The only mention of do not trace
from aerial maps is when it is off Google's maps because we cannot
legaly use them.
Never before have I seen a
On 23/11/2010 17:41, Florian Heer wrote:
This is very exciting news. But I could not find any way to make use
of that at the moment. So I guess this will be possible in the future
as in opposed to now?
The announcement was made less than an hour ago -- be patient!
On 18/11/2010 12:55, Martin wrote:
We've had some feedback which indicates there is a missing link that
enables cyclists to avoid a nasty roundabout over the A24 joining
Horsham with Broadbridge Heath.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.06709lon=-0.35466zoom=17layers=M
The link basically
On 18/11/2010 19:36, Dave F. wrote:
There are too many to list, but whilst this is topical, I have a minor
problem with natural=*. It's far too general. I mean, everything under
the sun is either natural or man made.
Also historical=* is just too subjective to be useful. Everything, by
On 18/11/2010 20:18, Dave F. wrote:
If key tags don't mean anything, why have them?
It's a quirk of the way tagging works more than anything. We need
key-value tags for properties like name=* and oneway=* and there's no
point in having two separate tagging systems for class type tags and
On 13/10/2010 08:50, Sam Wilson wrote:
1. We use OSM maps for navigation, and so management are quite able to
see the value that could arise from our giving this data to OSM,
because it would make the maps better. But there is a bit of a gap
between lots-of-GPS-traces and
On 27/08/2010 14:17, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
In a town which does not have underground storm water management, the
gutters at the side of the roads have to cross one of the roads at an
intersection so you have a half-elliptical shaped culvert which traffic
crosses, making a little ford. The
On 27/08/2010 15:36, Pieren wrote:
But nobody is replying to my suggestion : is it okay to replace
culvert=yes but a tunnel=culvert (or tunnel=sewel)(or bridge=culvert on
the highway when it happens that the structure is directly used as a
bridge) in the wiki ?
I believe it's been shown that
On 28/07/2010 14:57, Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
But the girl is worth image of the week anyhow...
http://xkcd.com/322/
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 13/07/2010 17:30, David Groom wrote:
1) add the slippymap plugin
2) then in preferences advanced preferences , add the following two
entries
key = slippymap.custom_tile_source_1.name ;value = ITO World OS
comparison
key = slippymap.custom_tile_source_1.url; value =
On 05/07/2010 23:28, Guy Collins wrote:
Another search: high street, barnstaple and yes the result includes various options but
always ...Devon County, Kelland Cross
You'll find the answer here:
http://nominatim.openstreetmap.org/details.php?place_id=12741345
Kelland Cross has been
On 24/06/2010 16:57, Toby Murray wrote:
Two days ago he tweeted that the new server
was nearly ready so hopefully things will improve soon!
And don't forget, if you think OpenCycleMap.org is great, you could
always call in at the shop on the way out:
http://shop.opencyclemap.org/
On 15/06/2010 10:58, Chris Hill wrote:
OS claim not have any easter eggs in their data. I, like you, would
definitely visit before adding anything. You may find that it is a
track, rather than a road.
The data may not contain easter eggs, but there are definitely errors.
Here:
On 02/05/2010 16:27, Graeme Wilford wrote:
This does look a good source and I've been using it to tidy up and add
detail to many of my previous edits. Anyone know it's vintage? Looks to
me like it's a couple years old; sometime mid 2008?
I can put it between mid 2006 and late 2008, based on
On 01/05/2010 13:04, James Rutter wrote:
Guys, there's been some suggestions on the list that there are
discrepancies between the new air survey and previous GPS traces and
also suggestions that the image needs 'reprojecting' etc.
James, you've got the wrong end of the stick on this. I'll
On 30/04/2010 11:48, Andy Allan wrote:
However, the new owners of the imagery gave us it to use for tracing,
so I'm pretty sure any licensing issues are solvable technicalities,
so I'd say crack on with using it.
That's exactly what I've been doing. However, I've noticed a varying
amount of
On 29/04/2010 09:10, Graeme Wilford wrote:
Anyone know where we are with this?
http://opengeodata.org/surrey-county-air-survey
Graeme,
Sorry -- I've been meaning to write this up on the wiki. Gravitystorm
has created a set of tiles for z19 using the imagery. The tiles are
available at:
On 05/04/2010 12:31, Tim Francois wrote:
Does this mean we can (gasp!) start tracing in Potlatch and JOSM? If so,
what's the final verdict on source=* tags?
Hold your horses, please. See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ordnance_Survey_Opendata
for a summary of what's happened so far, what
On 05/04/2010 16:38, Tim François wrote:
So then the question is: what's more of a problem? Features with no
name, or no features at all? Personally, I'd rather see the road on the
map with no name than not see a road at all, especially when using the
maps for in-car navigation.
Which would
On 29/03/2010 10:52, Gregory wrote:
I understand avoiding the ending character from being
non-alphanumeric(not letters or numbers) would mean a serious rewrite of
how the shortlinks are made/decoded. How much longer would short links
be if all digits were alphanumeric only?
It's also allowed
On 22/03/2010 22:38, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:
JOSM doesn't visualize relations at all. You need to notice that the
thing you're working on is part of a relation in the attributes dialog
(where the key/values are listed).
Almost true. It does if you work in the wireframe view, where
On 28/02/2010 22:27, Randy wrote:
Oops, I meant to check the groups list before sending this. There is an
announce list, as of last October. However, it hasn't had much activity.
That's because, try as I might, I'm not psychic and can't announce
things people don't tell me about.
Jonathan
On 04/03/2010 10:57, Pieren wrote:
Excepted that we should try to keep spelling consistent, no ? All other
approved tags using 'center' are written 'centre'.
According to OSMdoc, there are already 252 uses of
amenity=community_centre and 90 uses of amenity=community_center
So the more popular
On 04/03/2010 10:31, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
.and for around £50 you can look and feel the part:
Shouldn't that be *a* part?
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
On 23/02/2010 23:07, SteveC wrote:
Let me know if you want that retracted or anyone else would like to be
involved in anything we can accomplish with them.
You can give my name, if you like.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
talk mailing list
On 19/02/2010 09:49, Peter Reed wrote:
Looking at the result, the broad pattern is what you would expect, with
the south-east of England fairly well covered and gaps further north.
But at a detailed level things are not as simple as I had hoped. There
is too much variation between the
On 19/02/2010 20:56, Graham Jones wrote:
I can't find any recommended tags for such places, so I wondered how
other people are tagging them?
I've tagged the ones I've mapped as amenity=social_club and OSMDoc tells
me there are 66 uses of this tag in the DB.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
On 17/02/2010 14:06, Someoneelse wrote:
I suspect that the problem is that the places on this list tend not to
be places that you'd actively choose to visit in summer. I live not far
from Mansfield, so taking that as an example (to avoid being
disrespectful to anyone else's home town!), it
On 05/02/2010 03:12, Sam Wilson wrote:
Hullo,
Does any one have any ideas about what programs I could use on tablet
computers in vehicles for navigation and tracking, and possibly editing?
For the navigation and tracking you could use TrackMyJourney
On 04/02/2010 14:49, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
AFAIK our current license offers our data for everyone who attributes
correctly, but I'd like to raise the issue of malicious use of our
data by governmental organisations. What do you thing about setting up
a paragraph that prohibits the use of
On 21/01/2010 15:21, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote:
Maybe a big map of Haiti or something?
Hardly a valid criticism of OS though, is it?
You don't have any maps of Haiti...
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
On 19/01/2010 20:02, Shaun McDonald wrote:
You may find that adding openstreetmap to your web searches helps to find
openstreetmap related stuff.
Or even using this custom search of the wiki, mailing lists and forum:
http://bit.ly/osmsearch
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
On 14/01/2010 11:01, sara susini wrote:
This list generally uses English.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IT:FAQ
e
talk...@openstreemap.org - http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-it
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
talk mailing list
On 13/01/2010 20:45, Stan Berka wrote:
Whom do I contact to correct this?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Nominatim#Bugs_.2F_Error_reporting
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 13/01/2010 16:48, Brad Rogers wrote:
Not in my MUA. :-(
http://www.getthunderbird.com/
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
On 22/12/2009 16:27, John F. Eldredge wrote:
There also does not appear to be any provision on the OSM web site for
changing to a new password
See http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/your display name/account
where there are two password boxes. Fill them both in to change your
password.
--
Frederik Ramm wrote:
Oh, and someone in Ireland
has just released a motor that produces more energy than it consumes.
Apart from the massive D cell powering it, you mean?
http://blogs.zdnet.co.uk/news-blog/#10014630
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
maning sambale wrote:
Can't download and connect to the main site.
WORKSFORME
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Just a reminder that this is tonight, at the Britannia in Guildford:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/29580054
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-gb
Steve Bennett wrote:
[...] I tend to
believe I can ride my bike wherever the hell I want unless there's a
sign saying otherwise.
That's fine for your personal decision making. However, for OSM we need
to provide people with as much information as possible so they can make
their own, possibly
Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Please see the proposal here:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Dog_off-leash_area
This tag already seems to be well in use:
http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/leisure/dog_park
and there are no violent objections on the talk page, so it seems like
it's fine
Shalabh wrote:
JOSM does not give me that option of a bridge under hiking trail,
atleast not while using the presets. If I use the highway tag with a
bridge, consider this. I have a hiking trail marked as an 'demanding
alpine hiking' 50 km from any humanity and then I have a bridge tagged
as
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
In Potlatch, 'Shift+g' shows only your traces and 'g' show all the
traces (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Potlatch/Keyboard_shortcuts).
But the same shortcuts don't work in JOSM and nothing similar is listed
in http://josm.openstreetmap.de/wiki/Shortcuts. Is
Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
The only drawback is that it depends on always working on the same host.
I often move and I would have preferred a solution that does not depend
on local data but only on what is on the server.
USB key? That has the advantage of working now, rather than waiting for
Chris Andrew wrote:
Hi, all.
I'd like to add my local veterinary practice to the map, but can't
find an appropriate tag.
Does one exist?
Cheers,
Chris.
OSMDoc has amenity=veterinary as the most-used version of the tag:
http://osmdoc.com/en/tag/amenity/veterinary
--
Jonathan
Does anyone from Surrey (and Hants, Sussex or Berks) fancy a social in
Guildford during the first week in December? I'm thinking of Wednesday
2nd or Thursday 3rd.
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
Talk-GB mailing list
Talk-GB@openstreetmap.org
David Groom wrote:
I have been doing the former, but it appears this might stop routing
applications allowing a car to travel from c - d as the barrier = stile
blocks the road to vehicle transport, and so the second tagging option
might be better.
Indeed it is. If it helps, think of a way
bernhard wrote:
Does OSM provide something like openid for mobile devices.
OSM supports OAuth.
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OAuth
--
Jonathan (Jonobennett)
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo
