at here.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, April 28, 2023 at 10:56:22 AM EDT, Sören Reinecke
wrote:
I am impressed that some of you always choose the path to complain about things
going against their own world view rather to provide useful suggestion
...@osmfoundation.org. We will consult over the next two weeks until February
23, and then discuss at the next Board meeting on that date.
Thanks-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https
king group.
As a non-native English speaker, I have to look up the definitions in the
dictionary to confirm.
=Arnalie
On Thu, Dec 10, 2020 at 1:06 AM Mikel Maron wrote:
The etiquette guidelines have issues, but I’m not sure that’s one. If there was
moderation and enforcement in place, than w
to send an invite to the rest of
> >>>> the LCCWG as well as to this mailing list. Since you have the ball
> >>>> rolling, can you include lo...@osmfoundation.org in the mailing.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:22 PM Heather Leson
This is great
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Tuesday, December 8, 2020, 03:55:49 PM EST, Heather Leson
wrote:
Great! Editing now
Hope we can have an initial chat
heather
Heather Leson
heatherle...@gmail.com
Twitter/skype: HeatherLeson
Blog: textontechs.com
"don't try calling this place anything else"? Is that common,
seems unneccesary?
Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, December 4, 2020, 06:04:49 AM EST, Frederik Ramm
wrote:
Hi,
when reverting an edit this morning I noticed that the node f
Thanks Mateusz, I agree. Points can easily be made without such garbage.
Unfortunately Frederik has a habit of using rhetoric that evokes violence
against women. I’m not saying that he or anyone here personally holds biased
views about women. But the effect is the same, it degrades our entire
Hi, I’m not actually a active moderator on this list, but I was asked to step
in by several people, and I think it’s appropriate. I think this discussion can
stay substantive without veering off topic into geopolitics (we have the whole
rest of the internet for that), and using profanity and
Might be a touch out of date, but useful guide to JOSM
https://labs.mapbox.com/mapping/
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Thursday, September 24, 2020, 03:20:01 AM EDT, Maarten Deen
wrote:
On 2020-09-24 08:50, Mateusz Konieczny via talk wrote:
> I looked at ht
Most companies are doing well, and get along well, we just only hear about the
problems. So it’s probably not this or that company to highlight, but
particular mapping projects that illustrate well how it’s done.
Mikel
On Friday, September 11, 2020, 3:54 PM, Michał Brzozowski
for this submission.
Best regards,
Mikel Maron
Board Member
OpenStreetMap Foundation
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
___
Talk-Kosovo mailing list
Talk-Kosovo@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-kosovo
, August 4, 2020, 5:42 PM, Mikel Maron wrote:
It was a joke more aimed at Rory and a continuation of the similar discussion
we’ve had on the board.
And yes I agree very much with the sentiment that we don’t want OSM to be
dominated by companies. or any single point of view for that matter.
I’ve come
s American reformer (Upton Sinclair) often said: "It is difficult to
get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not
understanding it."
– Joseph Eisenberg
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 2:08 PM Mikel Maron wrote:
Rory, I don't know about you, but I'm certainly hoping for
Rory, I don't know about you, but I'm certainly hoping for a bunch of corporate
sell outs rubber stamping iD decisions and squashing the common mapper into
conformity. Why else would we be doing this?
On Tuesday, August 4, 2020, 04:37:00 PM EDT, Rory McCann
wrote:
The Board hasn't
ur early focus on iD is to ensure continued development.
We want to find out what you, the OSM community, think. Do you have any
feedback?
If you know of an organisation that might want to fund this, please feel free
to ask them to contact the OSMF Board.
-Mikel, for the OSMF Board
* Mikel
A wide scale revert without assessing closely the quality and particulars in
specific countries is not a good idea. Just an opinion that a method is flawed
is not enough to demonstrate that such a wide scale revert is justified. Much
more detailed analysis is needed before it should even be
> Yes please - I am using Osmcha to look at changesets around me and i
have a high number of changesets which span half Europe and thus
intersect with the area i am looking at.
Side note to this discussion — in OSMCha you can filter out these wide spanning
changesets with “Bbox size bound”
at yes OSMF has the
responsibility to make sure it has a healthy development and community
environment.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Tuesday, June 9, 2020, 12:06:21 PM EDT, wrote:
On 09/06/2020 16:00, Simon Poole wrote:
> Nearly all of the origin
Hey I have some other things to say on this thread, but quickly this point is
based on incorrect assumptions
> But if push comes to shove, and someone
needs to decide how something is done, do we want US tech firms to decide what
the official OSM editor does, or do we want the OSMF to decide
Before everyone jumps to revert undelete block etc I’ve gotten in touch with
the teams at Akros and am helping to work out what’s happening here and
resolve. More soon.
Mikel
On Friday, May 22, 2020, 10:33 AM, Mateusz Konieczny via talk
wrote:
Are you sure that in 72427535 buildings were
Does possibly look like organized editing. No need to invoke intention — if
this was “stealth” that means they are intentionally trying to hide. More
likely case is they simply aren’t aware of the guidelines.
Mikel
On Friday, May 22, 2020, 4:52 AM, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
I just noticed
Update:
https://github.com/healthsites/healthsites/issues/1357#issuecomment-602164476
The editor is disabled for now.
They're working on fixing bad edits.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Sunday, March 22, 2020, 03:37:43 AM EDT, Oleksiy Muzalyev
wrote
Yikes. Good catch and agreed.
Can anyone track the extent of the damage, and prepare to restore the thrown
away tags, while keeping the good new data?
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Saturday, March 21, 2020, 12:42:01 PM EDT, Frederik Ramm
wrote:
Hi
examples of someone
asking OSMF about a PR/blog beforehand, nor the OSMF asking for that. Not a bad
idea to change expectations around this.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, March 20, 2020, 04:43:28 PM EDT, Simon Poole wrote:
Am 20.03.2020 um 20:00 schr
> But this thread is from Facebook trying to change that. To side step imports.
No they're not. It's a couple sections in a blog post that is being wildly
misinterpreted.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, March 20, 2020, 02:18:54 PM EDT, Rory McCann
wr
13:01 Uhr schrieb Mikel Maron :
Martin, have you actually tried RapiD? It doesnt resemble what you describe and
does not disempower anyone.
it changes the way we add things, or at least has potential to significantly
shift the relation of individual people creating geodata (bottom up) towards
bi
> How would a mapper performing imports via RapiD comply with the import
>guidelines?
By complying with the guidelines before setting up an import process that
leveraged RapiD for conflation.
Mikel
On Thursday, March 19, 2020, 11:28 AM, Jmapb wrote:
On 3/19/2020 7:57 AM, Mikel Maron
Some imports are good, some are bad. We have ways to asses them with
guidelines. There are tools to help the technical process. Maybe there’s more
possibilities with rapid on tooling, maybe not. Seems pretty simple.
This whole thread is blown out of proportion, and rehashing old theoretical
Martin, have you actually tried RapiD? It doesnt resemble what you describe and
does not disempower anyone. From talking to mappers in places with less
developed maps than Germany, there is enthusiasm about a tool that will help
their mapping processes, and a thorough understanding of the
Frederik, you’re crying out against phantoms, and getting stuck on one
interpretation of the word “authoritative”, and using that misinterpretation as
an excuse to beat on one of your favorite punching bags, and try to exact
radical unrational restrictions on a piece of software.
What Facebook
I heard Mapbox is working on this and divide data spatially not as
a sequence of changeset. My impression would be that this way
you could produce a "nice looking map" but most likely it will
break for routing purposes in most horrible ways where ways suddenly
are not connected anymore as some
er
signal of problems, and hope to explore implementing it with you all.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Monday, March 9, 2020, 08:10:29 PM EDT, Michal Migurski
wrote:
Hi everyone,
I’m writing to let you know about a new OpenStreetMap project Facebook just
mall, or
even large degree, is not based on any factual inquiry of what they've done.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Tuesday, March 10, 2020, 04:06:05 PM EDT, Marc M.
wrote:
Michal Migurski wrote
> Only those edits which have been validated to contain
a lot existing to draw on, and what's the most we can make with it.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
___
Diversity-talk mailing list
Code of Conduct:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Diversity/MailingList/CodeOfConduct
Contact the mods (private): diversity-talk-ow...@openstreetmap.org
a lot
OSMF can learn from what other folks have already done in our community, and I
hope to develop relationships to explore this more.
-Mikel
On Wednesday, February 12, 2020, 01:15:48 PM EST, Mikel Maron
wrote:
We just concluded second of two meetings today. Lots to digest, thanks
next steps. Maggie is going to start a OSM wiki page to gather previous
research, Rory is looking at tweaks to the Diversity Statement, and Jinal is
putting together a short form to gather details on interest from people who
didn't make this meeting.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel
Colin doesn’t seem to be advocating for deference to and worship of authorities
in all situations. That’s an over the top interpretation.
It’s maybe better to say that it’s something to consider when evaluating data —
as we always look at a mappers context in OSM when looking at edits and
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/2020-February/083993.html
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, 04:42:42 PM EST, stevea
wrote:
Thanks, Mikel, but may I please ask what you mean by "control boundaries?"
SteveA
> On
btw, I think it's entirely compatible to follow On the Ground, with tagging
that recognizes the distinction between political boundaries and control
boundaries.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Tuesday, February 11, 2020, 03:55:48 PM EST, stevea
wrote:
On Feb 11
There’s really no good time that works universally. These won’t be the only
meetings or way to get involved, they’re just to get things moving.
Mikel
On Saturday, February 8, 2020, 1:40 PM, Philip Barnes
wrote:
On Sat, 2020-02-08 at 16:12 +, Mikel Maron wrote:
To accommodate time zones
, February 6, 2020, 1:44 PM, Mikel Maron
wrote:
Last month, the OSMF adopted this Diversity Statement [1] and appointed a
committee [2] to compile research and undertake new research on our diversity,
identify root causes that contribute to any shortfalls, and make
recommendations to help
Godo point SteveA. If I had it to do over again, when I developed this in 2007
for our first edit war over city names in Northern Cyprus, I would have name
this the "On the Ground **Guideline**" rather Rule.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, February 7
There's two different concepts at play, that OSM does not currently tag well
when in conflict. There's national sovereignty, which is a political concept
which in large part depends on international recognition. And there's de facto
control, which could result from military actions. For most of
Heather -- I chose a time next week that would be near waking hours for maximum
number of timezones. We can have more than one initial meeting. Want to get
this moving. Suggest another time to me and we can schedule another.-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
Last month, the OSMF adopted this Diversity Statement [1] and appointed a
committee [2] to compile research and undertake new research on our diversity,
identify root causes that contribute to any shortfalls, and make
recommendations to help resolve issues and improve.
If you're interested to
Hello -- I've written up ideas on steps the OSMF could take to address
questions on diversity. Input and help welcomed. Please share to other OSM
channels so people from far and wide can participate.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/mikelmaron/diary/391966
ThanksMikel
* Mikel Maron
o/legal-talk to
"The list for discussion of all legal matters relating to Openstreetmap,
including licensing and copyright. For official information on the license from
the OSM Foundation, see https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Licence;
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @m
I suggest that those that want to continue this discussion do so on the
legal-talk mailing list. It’s especially for discussing this level of detail of
license questions.https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/legal-talk/
You all are free to ignore my suggestion, it’s not made with any
Some first results from the OSM community survey
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/09/17/pre-sotm2019-survey-initial-numbers-and-reflections-from-board-members/
Thanks all who submitted! Curious to hear reactions and ideas here and at SotM
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
Fascinating discussion, thanks for all participating. The tension between an
open community and standards of practice has always been the key dynamic of OSM.
What I think has changed as OSM has grown and accreted code, data, and culture
is .. less opportunity to just do it. Like many things in
> My main concern is rather that there are a lot of free form questions yet
>there is no option for the participants to allow publication of the individual
>free form answers in anonymized form.
Select “publicly aggregated and anonymously” as answer to the first question
and the free form
We did this write up on how the previous survey was useful for board
discussions, and some summary of what was raised
https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/06/13/surveying-openstreetmap/
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019, 05:55:35 PM GMT+3, marc
Also note that no questions are required, so you can skip if most comfortable
with that.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019, 05:00:05 PM GMT+3, Mikel Maron
wrote:
> The question wrt remote mapping would seem to be designed to achi
> The question wrt remote mapping would seem to be designed to achieve a
>specific result.
Not at all. But please do feel free to answer truthfully, and explain anything
in the previous question "Where do you map mostly?"
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
Sorry I but I disagree. Yoga is a long tradition in OpenStreetMap ;)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cPq4X47x3x0
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Wednesday, August 7, 2019, 10:04:46 AM GMT+3, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
sent from a phone
> On 7. Aug 2019, at
So many of our tools are oriented to
greenfield mapping. What creative workflows, metrics, analysis and
visualizations of OSM data can bring the same thrill of creating the map from a
completely blank slate, to a stage of the map where the base geometry is there?
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207
nk in another frame; or that even the corporate
frame can not encompass other viewpoints, only profit.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, July 26, 2019, 01:18:11 PM GMT+3, Joseph Eisenberg
wrote:
The most well-know version is from Upton Sinclair's campaign
senting correctly. We all here
get the difference and understand that HOT is a different organization. Making
this distinction is not Facebook's problem, but rather HOT and OSMF should do a
better job explaining the complexity of the whole universe of OSM.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mike
This is just another badly written article by a third party. As someone else on
thread said, hardly the first time a media piece gets OSM wrong.
Take a look at facebook’s own words here
https://tech.fb.com/ai-is-supercharging-the-creation-of-maps-around-the-world/
I’m sure there’s plenty of
. Deliberate open work to
apply ML where it can be useful -> aiding human mappers, is the name of the
game. Recommend to all to check it out directly.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Thursday, July 25, 2019, 05:29:17 PM GMT+3, Martijn van Exel
wrote:
I did. After Drish
onsider what
kind of approach we can take to imagine what OSM is like in the next 15 years.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Thursday, May 9, 2019, 5:56:14 PM EDT, Simon Poole
wrote:
Am 09.05.2019 um 23:14 schrieb Mikel Maron:
> What do you t
Also commend your attention to tagging issues Michael. There's certainly a
broader issue with how tags are managed in OSM. In short it's a mess all around
and is in need of a rethink. I don't think this minor issue is a "hill to die
on" however.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mi
Hello
I support the use of OSM for the SDGs.
I am not involved with this side event.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Thursday, March 28, 2019, 11:40:30 AM EDT, Comunidad GeoCensos
wrote:
Hola amigos,
Queremos invitarlos para incluir a la mayor cantidad de
A map built from data from the osm community index to connect to mapping
communities https://github.com/osmlab/osm-community-index
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Tuesday, March 12, 2019, 1:01:59 PM EDT, Martijn van Exel
wrote:
Hi all,
Here’s something I ask
Just as my opinions here don’t represent the osmf board, they don’t represent
Mapbox either.
Personally, I don’t care much about the details of attribution either way. I
love to see it and regularly look for it in every map I come across. I tweeted
this three weeks ago
better way. And that recommendation can only be
formulated through the OSMF; a mailing list discussion will not lead to a legal
decision, though it's an interesting pulse on the topic. afaik the LWG is
actually thinking about updating the guidance to modern day usage, and welcome
that effort.
* M
ttps://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/osmf-talk/2018-November/005427.html[3]
https://wiki.osmfoundation.org/wiki/Board/Minutes/2018-11-15#Voting_on_reviewing_recent_fee_waiver_requests
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
___
talk mailing lis
highlight gender
neutral bathrooms. "unisex=yes" is the tag used
there.https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1951346808
The application of the tag is not consistent across the campus, so is a prime
location to engage for a mapping effort.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmar
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Nakaner
This is an epic effort and appreciated.
But there are two things that need to be cleared up.
> The choice was to either
of the German
forum discussion, where the US community does not tend to hang out -- so I'm
not sure you should just make this assumption. How best to accomplish this
would actually be a good subject of discussion, but _before_ a mass action such
as the one Nakaner has deputized himself to do.
of the German
forum discussion, where the US community does not tend to hang out -- so I'm
not sure you should just make this assumption. How best to accomplish this
would actually be a good subject of discussion, but _before_ a mass action such
as the one Nakaner has deputized himself to do.
https://www.citylab.com/equity/2018/03/who-maps-the-world/555272/
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron___
Diversity-talk mailing list
Code of Conduct:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Diversity/MailingList/CodeOfConduct
Contact the mods
nts, so that development discussion and plans can
become more focused.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Tuesday, November 21, 2017, 10:36:05 AM EST, Matthijs Melissen
<i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
On 21 November 2017 at 14:47, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Let's not get hung up on this, I think we're missing the point.
The way the item in WeeklyOSM was written was rude and
One request. Can we not relitigate thie topic of Yuri's tool on this thread.
Want to focus on helping WeeklyOSM to improve its coverage of our whole
community.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, November 17, 2017, 4:29:39 PM EST, Steve Doerr
<doerr.s
ect and not helpful. The dynamic of the discussion be expressed much
better, with full information, without disrespecting each other. I'm happy to
find ways to help WeeklyOSM if you all agree that the issue of impartiality is
an important and serious one to take on.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207
Yes, doing this is hard work, and appreciate the job WeeklyOSM has to do. Point
is, statements like "Yuri is as unreasonable as before and tries to ignore all
the unwritten rules in OSM" is inappropriate, and there are many better ways to
summarize the topic.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835
contentious.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, November 17, 2017, 11:23:23 AM EST, Martin Koppenhoefer
<dieterdre...@gmail.com> wrote:
2017-11-17 16:53 GMT+01:00 Mikel Maron <mikel.ma...@gmail.com>:
Now try this version...
> Yuri Astrakha
dual, and allows the reader to enter the
discussion with an open mind.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, November 17, 2017, 6:52:25 AM EST, Rafael Avila Coya
<ravilac...@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi:
I've read the majority of the posts of the "New OSM Quick-Fi
communication is hard. We are missing all the context and cues from real
life. Let's make an extra effort to get beyond the inevitable miscommunications
when they crop up.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Tuesday, November 7, 2017, 4:32:42 AM EST, Yuri Astrakhan
<yuriast
s I think the tasking manager and it's
>> relationship> to OSM could be better communicated.
Hope this helps clear this up.
Thanks-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Monday, October 23, 2017, 11:24:33 AM MDT, Frederik Ramm
<frede...@remote.org> wrote:
e should have better guidance on the handling of trademark
policy, the appropriate ways and places to raise issues, and how the OSM
Foundation and LWG handle these issues. Will bring this up.
Thanks-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Monday, October 23, 2017, 10:23:14 AM MD
o and how to do it. We are all here in OpenStreetMap because we love
the map. Can we please use that as a starting point in our interactions, and
focus on helping each other to make the map together?
Thanks-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Monday, October 23, 2017, 7:5
after.
The chdr problem has been with us for years. There is little risk in giving
slightly more time to plan ahead. Perhaps that is best done country by country.
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Monday, August 28, 2017 7:06 AM, Christoph Hormann <o...@imagico.de>
ed in
DC, and these are expansions of both the street and the quadrant ("St NW" ->
"Street Northwest"(. Can we fix the script and regen the list?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109419946/historyhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109431926/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10943192
ed in
DC, and these are expansions of both the street and the quadrant ("St NW" ->
"Street Northwest"(. Can we fix the script and regen the list?
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109419946/historyhttp://www.openstreetmap.org/way/109431926/history
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/10943192
I'm going to check with some USG tech friends to see if they know anyone on the
FBI web team. I think it may prove more expedient and get better attention than
calling or emailing parts of the bureau which have little to do with this.
-Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
ontributor metadata from geodata would 1) really protect anyone 2)
not hobble the project, which depends so much on user reputation to retain
quality. In any case, let's kick that question down the road.
-MIkel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, May 5, 2017 12:28 PM,
l-tracker. Maybe we could also schedule a time to chat together on
IRC and brainstorm approaches.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Thursday, March 16, 2017 2:07 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>
wrote:
Hi,
I find it a bit unfortunate that yo
serving local
governments using OSM.
Let's get a catalog started -- want to create a wiki page Joost?
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, February 3, 2017 10:47 AM, john whelan <jwhelan0...@gmail.com>
wrote:
A couple of the city of Ottawa web sit
<penor...@mac.com> wrote:
On 1/6/2017 7:37 AM, Mikel Maron wrote:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/39517002 is an example. There were
issues with this import, sure. This was not vandalism, advertising, or a fatal
breakage of the map -- not a situation where an immediate action was jus
ole.ch> wrote:
Am 06.01.2017 um 16:37 schrieb Mikel Maron:
..
I would suggest that using this case to make your point is seriously
misplaced.
Reverting a broken import asap to allow for a) the guidelines to be
followed, b) address technical and legal issues, is the sensible,
logical and l
), assess where there's a need for
more clarity or inconsistencies, and propose some edits.
-Mikel
* Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, January 6, 2017 6:16 AM, Andy Townsend <ajt1...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 05/01/17 12:23, mi...@groundtruth.in wrote:
, and improve everyone's work
overall.
Mikel
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017, 5:00 PM, Richard Fairhurst
<rich...@systemed.net> wrote:
Mikel Maron wrote:
> Reverts should be held to the same standard as imports (outside
> of obviously urgent problems).
Where a revert of an import (or other au
guidance and practice in place as we have for Imports? * Mikel Maron *
+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
On Wednesday, January 4, 2017 2:50 PM, Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org>
wrote:
Hi,
On 01/04/2017 07:25 PM, nebulon42 wrote:
> I would revert it then.
> Violations of t
editor workflow. Maybe we
can work on guidelines that encapsulates this. With something written up, we'll
be able to stop "spinning wheels" on whether this is useful or not, and focus
on experimenting and implementing promising approaches.
-Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mi
to get our
conversations on the right footing
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Etiquette. Thanks -Mikel * Mikel Maron *
+14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
blockquote, div.yahoo_quoted { margin-left: 0 !important; border-left:1px
#715FFA solid !important; padding-left:1ex !important; background-color:white
!important; } Im not a designer, but standard wisdom on logos is something
that works at multiple scale with few substantial differences is
Please represent in the OSM US Census! https://osmlab.github.io/census/
Look forward to learning more about our community * Mikel Maron * +14152835207
@mikel s:mikelmaron
On Friday, July 22, 2016 5:36 PM, Mikel Maron <mikel.ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
p.s. We will be sharing th
/State_Of_The_Map_U.S._2016/Hands-On_Day#Code_sprints
We don't get many chances to come together and work together in person. Would
love to see this kick off more collaborative development in the community, into
the future.
-Mikel * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel
1 - 100 of 448 matches
Mail list logo
