Re: [Talk-us] Potential Mechanical Edit to remove access=private from Amazon Logistics driveways in NH

Vào lúc 11:55 2020-08-22, Volker Schmidt đã viết: On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 19:31, > wrote: I've even encountered signs that threaten people who attempt to use their driveway as a U-turn. This seems to be the rule in England, UK. When I

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Import WestCOG building footprints in south-west Connecticut

Thank Julien for pushing this forward! yeah, I tried to get addresses from here: http://geodata-ctmaps.opendata.arcgis.com/datasets/bfa7da83da384c2aa809882179369dc4_0/features/305004 and add them on top of the westCOG buildings. The data is a big mess because it's a join_table of like 30

Re: [Talk-us] Fwd: Re: [Tagging] [Talk-transit] [OSM-talk] Call for verification (Was: Re: VANDALISM !)

The answer by Clay Smalley was public and visible on mailing lists. Personally I was not answering because someone started mailing list thread under badly chosen title and spammed it to [Talk-us] AND [Tagging] AND [Talk-transit] AND [OSM-talk] Why not also to [Imports] and [Talk-pl] and

[Talk-us] Fwd: Re: [Tagging] [Talk-transit] [OSM-talk] Call for verification (Was: Re: VANDALISM !)

ever time this person answers, no one else will talk because he is addressing it to me and not the grope.   i have never id him as he has me, what about the rules ? Forwarded message From: Clay Smalley < claysmal...@gmail.com > To: 80hnhtv4a...@bk.ru, Public

Re: [Talk-us] [Talk-transit] [OSM-talk] Call for verification (Was: Re: VANDALISM !)

Everyone knows who you're talking about at this point, and nobody cares. Use the remaining day or so of your temporary ban to work on some hobbies outside of OpenStreetMap. And be careful about who you say isn't local. I'm moving to Northern Indiana next week and I'll certainly get the chance to

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Call for verification (Was: Re: VANDALISM !)

>it was one person in CA adding 400 unverified tags to rail service in chicago. >  >one just 818 m, away from my home. >  >>Saturday, August 22, 2020 12:32 PM -05:00 from Martin Koppenhoefer < >>dieterdre...@gmail.com >: >> >>sent from a phone >>  >>> On 22. Aug 2020, at 10:15, pangoSE <

Re: [Talk-us] Potential Mechanical Edit to remove access=private from Amazon Logistics driveways in NH

On Sat, 22 Aug 2020 at 19:31, wrote: > Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2020 10:14:00 -0700 > From: Minh Nguyen > To: talk-us@openstreetmap.org > Subject: Re: [Talk-us] Potential Mechanical Edit to remove > access=private from Amazon Logistics driveways in NH > I've > even encountered signs that

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Import WestCOG building footprints in south-west Connecticut

Le Sat, 22 Aug 2020 13:30:02 -0400, Yury Yatsynovich a écrit : > Hi Julien, > The following communication that I've had recently with a CT official > might be of interest to you: > > Oh, great! I think we already saw this data (I tried to contact them too, but never got a reply :/). From what

Re: [Talk-us] [Imports] Import WestCOG building footprints in south-west Connecticut

Hi Julien, The following communication that I've had recently with a CT official might be of interest to you: * Hi Yury, At this point, yes, I think that’s correct. Obviously, we’d like if you cite the state, but we don’t have set guidelines for that. I forwarded the other issue with

[Talk-us] Import WestCOG building footprints in south-west Connecticut

Hi! With other contributors in Connecticut, we would like to import building footprints. We have evaluated different data sources, and concluded that no Connecticut-wide sources were usable without a lot of manual work to fix building geometry. We found that the WestCOG has very accurate

Re: [Talk-us] Potential Mechanical Edit to remove access=private from Amazon Logistics driveways in NH

Vào lúc 12:01 2020-08-16, Alex Weech đã viết: Hello all, I'm planning a mechanical edit to remove the access=private tag that Amazon Logistics mappers added in New Hampshire. They originally added the tag without using street-level imagery to look for no trespassing signs, and they made so,

[Talk-us] licence? | Re: [Imports] Importing data from alltheplaces.xyz

That site is “A growing set of web scrapers designed to output consistent geodata about as many places of business in the world as possible.” I don't think it's CC0 licenced. It's a collection of other databases. Have they gotten permission from all the business that they scrape that they

[Talk-us] Importing data from alltheplaces.xyz

Dear OSM community, I've been mapping Moundsville, WV nowadays (one of my friends live there so i chose that location). I'm ottwiz on OSM (https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/ottwiz) from Hungary. Sometimes i didn't know how to publish imports correctly  from https://www.alltheplaces.xyz/( it

Re: [Talk-us] VANDALISM !

On 22/08/2020 02:35, Clay Smalley wrote: For those who aren't following, the DWG recently decided on a two-day ban for the person who posted this, for the exact behavior they're exhibiting right now: https://www.openstreetmap.org/user_blocks/3850 Indeed, and it wasn't done lightly - only

Re: [Talk-us] [Tagging] VANDALISM !

Thanks to DWG for taking this action. Aug 22, 2020, 03:35 by claysmal...@gmail.com: > For those who aren't following, the DWG recently decided on a two-day ban for > the person who posted this, for the exact behavior they're exhibiting right > now: >

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] Call for verification (Was: Re: VANDALISM !)

"It a playground with half-ass quality more than an authoritative and verified source of information (like e.g. Wikipedia)" I am not sure whatever you claim that Wikipedia is "playground with half-ass quality" or "authoritative and verified source of information". Though any of this claims

Re: [Talk-us] [OSM-talk] VANDALISM !

I largely agree, but I have found there are times and places where explicitly saying "this particular wiki here is being PREscriptive (should be done), rather than the usual tone of DEscriptive (as done now)" can be a value-add to both our map and our wiki (in the long run). When done well and