Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-21 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 04:43 AM 2/19/2005, Remy Maucherat wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It definately seems like j-t-c should be a first candidate for svn conversion. The other jakarta-tomcat repositories are considerabily more complex. But it would be good to have line endings straightened out beforehand. I

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-19 Thread Remy Maucherat
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It definately seems like j-t-c should be a first candidate for svn conversion. The other jakarta-tomcat repositories are considerabily more complex. But it would be good to have line endings straightened out beforehand. I find svn quite confusing to work with.

AW: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread Hans Schmid
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 17. Februar 2005 20:34 An: Tomcat Developers List Betreff: Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, first: thanks a lot to Mladen for adding all the beautiful features [and removing CRLF :) ]. Big

Re: AW: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread Mladen Turk
Hans Schmid wrote: Hi, I just want to describe our usecase because we make heavy use of the local_worker and local_worker_only flags right now. We use those flags for 'maintenance' mode and failover very successfuly. Cool ;). But please see our setup and usecase below. We only use one tomcat at

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread Rainer Jung
So I don't see the point of forking 1.3. Both config and core features are the same. Of course some advanced configuration properties where changes, lot new added, but from the outside its still old mod_jk. OK, understood from below. I agree concerning JNI deprecation. But read comments about

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: With stickyness and session id one would have: - sticky worker (the correct one) - failover for the preferred (your redirect) - any other in the same replication cluster (domain) - the rest (loose session but can start the app again from the beginning) Your redirect concept and

AW: AW: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread Hans Schmid
release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results Hans Schmid wrote: Hi, I just want to describe our usecase because we make heavy use of the local_worker and local_worker_only flags right now. We use those flags for 'maintenance' mode and failover very successfuly. Cool

Re: AW: AW: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread Mladen Turk
Hans Schmid wrote: Thanks, Mladen, as long as this disabled feature does not prevent the failover case, I am fine ;) OK. So basically you have two tomcat boxes where the second is used only when you wish to put the first on maintenance? Both Tomcats are always running, but the second one is

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
At 12:56 PM 2/17/2005, Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, first: thanks a lot to Mladen for adding all the beautiful features [and removing CRLF :) ]. Big leap forward! Here's a list of all mixed up line endings currently in jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ ... The Mismatch'ed files all represent files with

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Here's a list of all mixed up line endings currently in jakarta-tomcat-connectors/jk/ ... The Mismatch'ed files all represent files with mixed line endings (some cr/lf, some cr/cr/lf.) Two things. See no CRLFs for any .h or .c inisde j-t-c. Also Bill, will you be OK

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread William A. Rowe, Jr.
It definately seems like j-t-c should be a first candidate for svn conversion. The other jakarta-tomcat repositories are considerabily more complex. But it would be good to have line endings straightened out beforehand. This checkout was with the cvs Win32 client. It seems, from all the

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-18 Thread Mladen Turk
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: It definately seems like j-t-c should be a first candidate for svn conversion. The other jakarta-tomcat repositories are considerabily more complex. Yes, if everyone else agree we should consider moving to svn. The problem is only with Tomcat build process. If ant

mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-17 Thread Rainer Jung
Hi, first: thanks a lot to Mladen for adding all the beautiful features [and removing CRLF :) ]. Big leap forward! I think that until Monday we were still in the progress of adding features, and fixing bugs. 1.2.8 changed a lot internally, but most was functionally compatible to 1.2.6. Release

Re: mod_jk release policy - was: JK 1.2.9-dev test results

2005-02-17 Thread Mladen Turk
Rainer Jung wrote: Hi, first: thanks a lot to Mladen for adding all the beautiful features [and removing CRLF :) ]. Big leap forward! Still, I cope with those on a daily basis. I think that until Monday we were still in the progress of adding features, and fixing bugs. 1.2.8 changed a lot