I've just updated all the samples to use SDO 2.1 so this should work now.
...at
On 12/19/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm trying to build from a clean check out of the Tuscany Java trunk,
just running mvn with no options, and getting the following error:
[INFO]
Hi,
yes, this change happened on the 13th of Dec, see
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg11866.html
Regards, Kelvin.
On 19/12/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the SDO spec version was bumped to 2.1 and something that
uses it was not updated to reflect
Hi,
Have got the code changes working for Derby and testing for DB2 and MySQL.
config.xsd will have
xsd:complexType name=ConnectionInfo
xsd:sequence
xsd:element maxOccurs=1 minOccurs=0 name=ConnectionProperties
type=config:ConnectionProperties/
/xsd:sequence
I tried this with MySQL and it worked, columns with no default values were
initialized as NULL.
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 12/19/06, Kevin Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luciano,
I think you are right. The best behavior may be to generate an INSERT
statement
Hi Brent
This would be the case of trunk code, would Florian see the same issue
with M2 ?
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 12/19/06, Brent Daniel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Florian,
This is being tracked in Tuscany-961. The resolution is tied up in
moving the DAS to
Pete et al,
The latest code from HEAD is still broken - it fails the
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-962 scenario. This is the #1
use case for SCA - we cannot use this latest code with PHP.
--
Caroline
On 20/12/06, Caroline Maynard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pete et al,
The latest code from HEAD is still broken - it fails the
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-962 scenario. This is the #1
use case for SCA - we cannot use this latest code with PHP.
--
Caroline
Yes I know and it
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=comments#action_12459959
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
The changes we're currently making as part of TUSCANY-859 may affect this
behavior. It would be good to have
Hi,
Integrating Robbie's code (jira
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-987) highlights a general
problem for testing statically generated types. For example, statically
generated classes using Tuscany's SDO M2 implementation are not compatible
with the current SDO implementation (in
On Dec 19, 2006, at 11:38 AM, Luciano Resende wrote:
Do you see also changes like :
distribution/sca to sca/distribution?
Yes.
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Thanks, we're OK to stick with the old level for now. I understood this
thread to say that the latest version would work both for Sebastien's
scenario and for the WSDL generation, but it seems I was confused. I'll keep
waiting for the ultimate fix ...
On 20/12/06, Pete Robbins [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 15/12/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does it mean that we'll need two different SDO distributions? one for
use inside Apache Httpd, another for use outside?
What happens if we init Libxml multiple times? does it crash? is it a
performance issue? does it break other
Jeremy,
I think where these should end up is dependent how the tools are
positioned within the Tuscany project.
While the wsdl2java tool currently generates interfaces with SDO
parameters, will there ever be extensions to support other data binding
types? Considering WSDL is a first class
I think the CTS should test static SDOs, but maybe it should be a separate
optional part and maybe even a lower priority to focus on.
As you point out, the SDO spec doesn't define how generators work, how
static metadata is registered, or even how to create instances statically
- according to
Modified:
incubator/tuscany/java/samples/sca/greeterws-oneway/src/main/
webapp/META-INF/tuscany/webapp.scdl
incubator/tuscany/java/samples/sca/helloworldws-async/src/main/
webapp/META-INF/tuscany/webapp.scdl
incubator/tuscany/java/samples/sca/helloworldws/src/main/webapp/
I knew you were going to ask that :-) I wonder the same thing.
However, I see other scdls along with webapp.scdl, such as
binding.axis2.scdl, databinding.axiom.scdl and
interface.wsdl.scdl.
I am not sure why they are there to begin with. I know I created
two of these samples, but I did not put
On Dec 20, 2006, at 8:19 AM, Matthew Sykes wrote:
Jeremy,
I think where these should end up is dependent how the tools are
positioned within the Tuscany project.
While the wsdl2java tool currently generates interfaces with SDO
parameters, will there ever be extensions to support other
I'd vouch for not needing them (or if for some reason we do, I'd
vouch for fixing the bug that causes that).
--
Jeremy
On Dec 20, 2006, at 8:41 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I knew you were going to ask that :-) I wonder the same thing.
However, I see other scdls along with webapp.scdl, such
On 14/12/06, Geoffrey Winn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've just checked in the change for localtime, replacing it with
localtime_r
on Unix and localtime_s on Windows.
Ah. Unfortunately this is a backward compatibility issues with MS compilers.
localtime_s() does not exist in VC++ 6. But
On Dec 20, 2006, at 8:48 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
I'd vouch for not needing them (or if for some reason we do, I'd
vouch for fixing the bug that causes that).
--
+1 to that (if there is a bug, I'd be happy to help out).
Also, on a slightly different topic, since these samples are
Ok. A slight complication is that the async samples are
currently not working (see TUSCANY-1003 and 1004).
So I think it may be better to wait until the issues are
fixed to try to debug the use of the scdls.
On 12/20/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd vouch for not needing them
So, i was trying to create a test case for :
Insert with no changed properties to row with generated ID (you could
duplicate the test above with Company since it has a generated ID)
public void testPartialReadInsertApplyWithGeneratedID() throws Exception {
DAS das =
Maybe it has something to do with ths thread:
http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg11303.html
Adriano Crestani
On 12/20/06, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, i was trying to create a test case for :
Insert with no changed properties to row with generated ID
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=comments#action_12460009
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
FYI, our application test suite was unable to reproduce this problem on a
single-CPU system. Rather, we had to use
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=comments#action_12460015
]
Frank Budinsky commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
I don't know a lot about thread safety/sychronizing but I wonder if changing
the put() call to something
Hi All,
I have uploaded the proposed version of our site at
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/.
Please take a look and give your feed back on things that needs changes. At
the present moment here are somethings that yet need to be addressed: -
- The Release page for
Couple comments :
- Do we need FAQ entry on the Outlines for SCA, SDO and DAS ?
- There are still some broken links, maybe it's good to have at least an
empty page for those links
BTW, Looks good in Firefox...
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 12/20/06, Venkata
I have converted our other test cases to junit 4.1 and am in the process of
doing some cleaning up etc. Will send out a quick update tonight and can
integrate into tuscany if needed.
* * * Whether the CTS should test static SDOs (I believe so) ? * * *
Optional means to supply static class
[snip]
Venkata Krishnan wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded the proposed version of our site at
http://people.apache.org/~svkrish/tuscanySite/site-publish/.
Please take a look and give your feed back on things that needs
changes. At
the present moment here are somethings that yet need to be
Small comment. The SCA icon does not seem to be linked to
the SCA overview, the way the DAS and SDO icons are linked
to their respective overviews.
Thanks
On 12/20/06, Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi All,
I have uploaded the proposed version of our site at
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-987?page=comments#action_12460033
]
Robbie Minshall commented on TUSCANY-987:
-
Converted Brian's test cases to Junit 4.1 format. Uploaded as an attachment
robbieBrianCTS_20061220.zip
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-987?page=all ]
Robbie Minshall updated TUSCANY-987:
Attachment: robbieBrianCTS_20061220.zip
uploading Brian's test cases converted to Junit 4.1. See prior attachment for
more detailed status.
Create
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006?page=comments#action_12460043
]
Ron Gavlin commented on TUSCANY-1006:
-
I will give that a try and let you know.
The synchronized HashMap I proposed synchronizes on reads which introduces
On Dec 19, 2006, at 8:12 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
I'm assuming the goal of supporting conversational callbacks
is to allow a callback invocation to occur on a client component
instance that contains state that existed when the correspon-
ding forward invocation went out. This to me means
As the SCA trunk depends on SDO to build I have deployed snapshots of
the 2.1 spec jar and sdo impl to the snapshot repo.
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
I noticed that IntrospectionRegistryImpl.introspect uses
getAllPublicAndProtectedFields to obtain the fields on
which to invoke each processor's visitField. However,
the CI spec seems to imply that it should be possible
to inject a conversation id (the spec still refers to it as
@SessionID but
You are not providing any configuration to indicate the generated key.
BTW, Brent mentioned that this test case is covered by:
GeneratedId.testInsert5()
Luciano Resende wrote:
So, i was trying to create a test case for :
Insert with no changed properties to row with generated ID (you could
pom.xml defines dependencies. However, it doesn't seem obvious about
ClassPath order between dependency and dependent.
How to tell Maven ClassPath order please?
How to change Maven ClassPath order please?
The problem I'm encountering is, SDO has two versions of TestUtil
(tools\TestUtil ignores
There's a bunch of old snapshots from before M1 (4/19/06) which I
plan to remove unless someone speaks up ...
--
Jeremy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1006
brings up a Map concurrency issue.
We probably can support concurrent Map and trade off dirty read for Map
performance.
What do you think please?
It improves User Experience if we support concurrent Map in ChangeSummry for
instance.
A complete
We did a lot to clean up the samples for M2 but as a result they are
out of sync with trunk and quite a few changes need to be ported
forward. It might actually be easier to just (selectively) overwrite
them with the ones from M2.
In light of that my inclination is to remove them from the
When refactoring the tuscany/sca/util classes, I noticed a number of
'using namespace xyz' statements in some of our header files. I believe
C++ practice is to avoid 'using' statements in a header file as they
impact all cpp files that include the header and can cause name clashes.
I think I
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
When refactoring the tuscany/sca/util classes, I noticed a number of
'using namespace xyz' statements in some of our header files. I
believe C++ practice is to avoid 'using' statements in a header file
as they impact all cpp files that include the header and can
43 matches
Mail list logo
