On Aug 17, 2006, at 6:22 PM, James Mitchell wrote:
I'm not proposing anything different from what is already outlined
by the wiki page. It says that the winner will need to submit a
signed CLA.
Ah, my mistake. No CLAs needed until a winner is declared :-)
Greg
Can you post your stacktrace? Are you actually getting tiles-based
views to work?
Greg
On Aug 29, 2006, at 2:44 AM, Daniel del Río wrote:
Hello,
looking in he logs i see a lot of erros with the message:
.. tiles.TilesViewHandler - Tiles error
org.apache.tiles.FactoryNotFoundException:
On Aug 29, 2006, at 8:13 AM, Dick Starr wrote:
When I saw that the navigation rule required a slash, I went with a
slash on the tiles defs. Per Kito's book (p 132), the view-id must
always start with a slash - but I don't know why.
Wow, I didn't know that. Sounds kinda restrictive. Does
On Aug 29, 2006, at 9:35 AM, Daniel del Río wrote:
I'm not using tiles views, only clay templates (as far I know clay
templates haven't any relation to tiles, isn't?
No, not inherently.
[ACTIVE] ExecuteThread: '2' for queue: 'weblogic.kernel.Default
(self-tuning)' ERROR
Here's my vote:
1st choice: # {81}
2nd choice: # {19}
3rd choice: # {17}
4th choice: # {94}
5th choice: # {37}
Greg
I have votes from all PMC members except Craig. Craig did I miss
yours or have you not voted yet?
Thanks,
Greg
On Oct 4, 2006, at 7:09 AM, James Mitchell wrote:
The voting is still open right now. We'll give people until this
weekend before we tally the results.
If anyone hasn't voted
I don't see any reference to adding the validator tag to faces-
config.xml. Did you do that? (or did I miss something?)
Greg
On Oct 6, 2006, at 2:11 PM, Wendy Smoak wrote:
On 9/25/06, Mauricio Scheffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks everyone, I'll try the latest svn
I only fixed the
On Oct 11, 2006, at 6:06 AM, Gregg Leichtman wrote:
I suppose that I could create a different definition like:
definition name=/mainLayout path=/tiles/layouts/
siteLayout.jsp
put name=htmlHeader type=template value=/
put name=header type=template value=/tiles/
On Nov 8, 2006, at 11:34 AM, David Geary wrote:
2006/11/8, Jonathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
added the space and the flush false now i get a
java.lang.IncompatibleClassChangeError
org.apache.shale.tiles.TilesViewHandler.dispatchToTile(
TilesViewHandler.java:304)
On Nov 14, 2006, at 3:24 PM, Dick Starr wrote:
Nov 14, 2006 2:18:04 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Error filterStart
Nov 14, 2006 2:18:04 PM org.apache.catalina.core.StandardContext start
SEVERE: Context [/starraShale] startup failed due to previous errors
These 2
On Nov 15, 2006, at 2:26 PM, Dick Starr wrote:
My problems don't seem to be Tomcat related. I have tried my earlier
Tomcat (5.5.12) as well as the latest 5.5 Tomcat (5.5.20).
I don't think it's a Tomcat problem either. I think you have a
filter failing, but we're not seeing why. If the
Is anyone using Shale Remoting with Facelets? Since you're supposed to
short-circuit the JSF lifecycle from a remoting method, how would you use
facelets to render the resulting view? Is it possible?
Thanks,
Greg
The Struts team is pleased to announce that Tiles has been promoted to its
own Top Level Project. This move will allow us to stabilize the development
of the Tiles 2 framework and push it towards its first final release. The
website for the new project has not yet been published so here are
On 1/18/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2. JSF 1.1, Facelets Shale
This is the platform we are currently developing on. It's very close to
working with JSF 1.2 from what I can tell (though I have not actually used
1.2 yet).
1. EL unification. Since I'm not using JSPs, this
On 1/22/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm just starting to look at Shale and would like to use the Tiles
functionality. I understand that there is an optional Tiles 2 JAR that is
still in the Struts sandbox.
Yes, there is still a snapshot built from the code in the Struts
On 1/26/07, Reynolds, James [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the taglib
file, don't be tempted to list the actual path to the component in the
tomahawk jar. Follow the component-type listed in the Facelets wiki
I had a feeling it had to do with the tomahawk taglib file. Just so you
know we are
We are using NetBeans with the mevenide plugin for maven support. We are
also using Facelets and the new Facelets Netbeans plugin. That gives us
autocomplete but not drag drop (I don't think). Seems to be working
great. On a team of 5 two were PHP types before this project and one other
had
Here are the relevant bits from the Tiles Test app:
web-app
[...]
context-param
param-nameorg.apache.tiles.CONTEXT_FACTORY/param-name
param-value
org.apache.tiles.context.enhanced.EnhancedContextFactory/param-value
/context-param
context-param
On 2/9/07, JS Portal support team [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, I can't seem to download the latest Tiles from
http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/tiles/binaries/tiles-2.0.0-bin.zip
Looks like you are trying to download a mirrored distribution and we don't
have one yet.
nor can I
On 2/26/07, Joel Powers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm looking at SiteMesh or Stand alone tiles with a JSF application
running
on JVM 1.4.x (WebSphere 6.x). From here:
http://struts.apache.org/struts-sandbox/tiles/index.html
First off, Tiles has graduated to a Top-Level Apache Project. See
On 9/12/07, Esteve Avilés [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does anybody know when will next Shale version be released?
No, I suppose we should get on that :-)
Will it include support on Tiles 2.0
Well, it already does, but it's working with an oder 2x version. I don't
think it's a huge task to go
On 9/21/07, Pavel Savara [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How stable are nightly builds?
I suppose we will developed new project for a while before it goes live so
would you recommend to use nightly builds because new version will be out
soon or should I stick with latest release rather?
Does it
On 10/4/07, Wendy Smoak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There's not much development going on, but if there's interest in a
release we can probably round up enough people to make it happen.
I'd like to see the Tiles 2 integration sorted out first, though.
I agree. That move us closer to pushing
On Feb 2, 2008 5:44 AM, samju [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just want to check how many user, Companies, etc. are using Shale. thanks
For your feedback in advance!
The company I work for uses the Remoting architecture.
Greg
that his work has made it difficult for him to be as
involved as he once was. At his own request, Craig is now an emeritus
member of the Shale PMC.
Thank you,
Greg Reddin
Apache Shale PMC Member
On Thu, Mar 27, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Many have told me that Facelets has clearly won and we should just try to
help them out JSF 2 will be featured from facelets.
Yeah, but... Many have also complained that there hasn't been much
movement in Facelets
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 5:19 PM, Rahul Akolkar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Since Greg mentioned he'd be away, I've tried to rectify it. Waiting
for the sync.
Thanks, sorry about that. I guess the mvn release:perform did that.
Greg
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:49 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm using Tomahawk 1.1.6 on WebSphere 6.1 and does work correctly. But
on the log I found:
Both MyFaces and the RI are on your classpath. Please make sure to use
only one of the two JSF-implementations.
I know that WAS has a JSF
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Mario Buonopane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi, one year agò i download the shale version 1.1.0-SNAPSHOT-20070626.
Now i can't find any version 1.1.X from the shale site. Any body cna help
me?
We're sort of in a state of disrepair right now. Do you know where you
On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 12:20 PM, Mario Buonopane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand why you are working now on version 1.0.5 and one year agò
on 1.1.0! If you go in project summary you talk about version 1.1.0!
Mostly because (I think) 1.1.0 is meant to be used with JSF 1.2, etc.
On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 2:49 AM, Mario Buonopane [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, i don't remember that Shale 1.1.0 is meant to be used with JSF 1.2 but
with 1.1. In fact i'm using with MyFaces 1.5 (JSF 1.1).
What does mean GA codebase?
I don't remember if JSF 1.2 is a requirement for Shale 1.1 or
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Gary VanMatre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see their is are profiles for jdk 1.4, 1.5, and 1.6. 1.4 is for
Servlet v 2.4 where as 1.5 and 1.6 are for Servlet v2.5. Based on this
I see 2 distributions, one for JSF 1.1 (profile = shale-test-jdk14) and
one for
If you have only 30 seconds to read this;
Join us in celebrating the ASF's 10th Anniversary at ApacheCon!
The Call for Papers is now open for ApacheCon US 2009, taking place 2-6
November in Oakland, California. Proposals are being accepted at
http://us.apachecon.com/c/acus2009/cfp/ and can be
The Travel Assistance Committee is now accepting applications for those
wanting to attend ApacheCon EU 2009 between the 23rd and 27th March 2009
in Amsterdam.
The Travel Assistance Committee is looking for people who would like to
be able to attend ApacheCon EU 2009 who need some financial
ApacheCon EU 2009 registration is now open!
23-27 March -- Mövenpick Hotel, Amsterdam, Netherlands
http://www.eu.apachecon.com/
Registration for ApacheCon Europe 2009 is now open - act before early
bird prices expire 6 February. Remember to book a room at the
Subject: ApacheCon Europe 2009: Early Bird Deadline Extended
until 13th of February
Here's some great news for everyone who's thinking of
traveling to Amsterdam for this year's ApacheCon Europe. The Early Bird
deadline has been extended to Friday, February 13th - and remember,
there is a
://attic.apache.org.
You can follow the progress of the move at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ATTIC-2 if you so wish.
On behalf of the Apache Shale PMC, Thanks!
Greg Reddin
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 11:44 AM, Cyril Bouteille cy...@travelmuse.com wrote:
This is sad news! Can you please recommend alternative projects for
migration of deployed View-Controller and Remote features? Thanks.
Just my viewpoint: probably your best bet would be to migrate to Seam
and/or
38 matches
Mail list logo
