Dave,
Could it be explained by sintering effect of nano particles ? After cooling,
the inactive wire resistance drop of approximately 0.03 from the before
calibration situation. That's why Celani didn't try the 48W on its active
wire.
Arnaud
_
From: David Roberson
The calibration wire is just a nichrome wire, or so it says on the slide.
Nothing was said about doing any special processing on this wire.
There's something else weird about the slide. The last bullet at bottom
says the R/R0, of both wires, just slightly increased (as expected),
increasing the
Jeff,
At the jump from 15W to 30W heat power of the active wire, look
precisely at the power applied to the wire. The power went above 30W
for a few samples (How many seconds ?). So the wire temperature went
above the equilibrium temperature for 30W. After the exact 30W was
applied, the
Is this the first paper in which one group has reported100% success in
multiple tests (over 150)?
http://newenergytimes.com/v2/conferences/2012/ICCF17/ICCF-17-Godes-Controlled-Electron-Capture-Paper.pdf
(I'm using that link because it's in the wired article).
(lenr.qumbu.com -- analyzing the
That might be an explanation for the problem Arnaud. But why did he not do
another re calibration with the changed wire so that it made sense? All the
remainder of the tests were conducted with the 48 watt drive power level so he
could have given us a good reference.
I also was wondering if
Put on your Tin-foil hats ...
This may or may not be off-topic... aside from a possible nano-thermite
connection to LENR (as one of the few chemical reactions which release soft
x-rays) but it is timely. It would have been more timely one week ago on
9-11, but nevertheless
Let me fist add
At 11:06 AM 9/13/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Energy_Catalyzer_(2nd_nomination)#Energy_Catalyzer
It survived deletion, despite complaints that:
Off wiki mailing list by Alanf777, Zedshort and others here:
(vortex)
which seems to
Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Is this the first paper in which one group has reported100% success in
multiple tests (over 150)?
Yup, it may be. I do not recall seeing such a high success rate before.
There may have been a few poorly documented reports of 100% success that I
suspected
If the Godes/McKubre system has 100% reproducibility why isn't it the
poster child for CF/LENR?! And why hasn't the CF/LENR research community
exhaustively investigated the system and built working models that would
show, irrefutably, that CF/LENR is real? In following this list I've read
about
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
If the Godes/McKubre system has 100% reproducibility why isn't it the
poster child for CF/LENR?!
Because it just happened. They only began this work 6 months or a year ago
as I recall, and this is the first paper. The official collaboration with
SRI just
By the way, those 150 tests were not conducted at SRI. SRI cannot yet
officially put their seal of approval on them, although they do say they
have confidence in the work. That's what McKubre told me.
Tests of this system will soon begin at SRI.
It is not shocking to me that something like this
Got a question on my blog Papps Noble Gas engine
http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32178/32178/#comments
From Norberthttp://hardsoftlucid.wordpress.com on September 15, 2012 at 7:18
pmhttp://froarty.scienceblog.com/32178/32178/#comment-423
Does the engine also create small gravitational
I asked Storms twice years ago, Does RF stimulation do any good? His
answers was, We tried it and it did not work!
In that there is a controversy.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Sep 18, 2012 2:04 pm
If we have learned anything from Griggs, Rossi, and Myers its that the power
contained in electrical pulses is difficult to measure.
Frank
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Tue, Sep 18, 2012 2:04 pm
Subject: Re:
Mark Gibbs asks rather impatiently,
Can anyone explain why this system isn't being refined and promoted at the
very least as proof of CF/LENR?
Very simply and obvious reasons. lack of details of exactly how, and patent
infringement!
The testing at SRI is getting underway and hopefully will
How disappointing. Once again, it looks like yet more jam tomorrow.
So, there aren't enough details in the paper for you chaps to theorize what
the actual physical test set up consisted of? Anyone care to take a WAG at
it?
Also, it's odd that other than in the paper's URL on
Gravitons (spin 2 bosons) released from atomic collapse/evaporation
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 2:46 PM, Roarty, Francis X
francis.x.roa...@lmco.com wrote:
*Got a question on my blog Papps Noble Gas engine** *
http://froarty.scienceblog.com/32178/32178/#comments **
** **
From Norbert
Dave,
Which wire are talking about for the re calibration ? The Number #1 which
has been destroyed (at least cut) ? Celani doesn't need a new calibration to
go further in its investigations. Only for reporting the re calbration is
useful.
In my point of view, the temperature of the active wire
Mark Gibbs mgi...@gibbs.com wrote:
How disappointing. Once again, it looks like yet more jam tomorrow.
It takes a long time to do research. Months and months to set up an
experiment. You have to live with that. It is like building a house with 2
or 3 people, or writing a million-line computer
In order to be commercially viable, the Godes reactor must move to a high
temperature hydrogen gas phase reactor. If enough RD funding is available
to do this, why go public.
A few months ago, Godes went public when he needed more RD funds. This
strategy worked and he got the additional funding
Arnaud,
I was complaining about the lack of calibration, but realize it is too late for
this particular wire set. It just seemed logical to me that they would have
immediately completed a re calibration after seeing the bad data from the first
pass.
We agree that the wire temperature is
I see what you refer to Jeff. And if you look at the behavior for the 15 watt
power level just prior to that point you notice that the R/R0 is slowly rising
at about the same rate. It suggests that it wants a power level of the average
of these two or 22.5 watts to be flat! If we consider
In reply to Eric Walker's message of Mon, 17 Sep 2012 21:01:00 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
Possibly, which is why I tried to word my response cautiously rather than
emphatically. ;)
IOW there may be some target isotopes where this is the case, and I'm not sure
whether or not 232Th would be one of them.
We agree that the wire temperature is likely the most important factor, but
I hold the thought that the dissociation of the molecular hydrogen is
possibly bound with the gas temperature. The energy required to break the
bond must come from somewhere. Take a look at Celani's charts for deuterium
As Jed says, there are not enough resources directed toward the field. I am
currently reviewing Celani's device since he has published a reasonable
document and data. I hope to mine that for as much knowledge as possible
before moving on. Perhaps information will become available concerning
I wrote:
If you had any idea how difficult it is, you would be amazed at how
quickly they do it, and how much progress they have made. . . .
Setting up and running an experiment is painstaking, time consuming work.
You can see what I mean in these photos of Celani's demonstration
Mark, I did this QA with Robert Godes July a year ago.
I had already spoke with him one-on-one in an interview I could not
publish about early January 2011 (before the Rossi demo).
Though the electrolytic cell generated a small COP, he had 100%
reproducibility then, turning on and off
We need all segments of society to get behind new energy.
As this becomes more known, the political class will start making lots
of rules and regulations. If the public is not aware, they will be
denied this technology by the regulators.
For young people, reading is not the dominant form of
Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
*One possible private donor seeking a technical evaluation was informed
by a **National Science Foundation** member (whose review entailed “a
quick scan” of the Brillouin Energy website) that it was “quite possible
they had created the ‘instant death’ version of
I read Mr. Godes paper the day it appeared on the New Energy Times site (I
think that was back in July?). I immediately had the feeling it was
important. At the same time, the word proprietary appears six times. It
seems clear that Mr. Godes believes the road to progress is a working
device, not
Thanks, Ruby ... Jed just asked the same question I was going to ask ...
[mg]
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 3:50 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Ruby r...@hush.com wrote:
*One possible private donor seeking a technical evaluation was informed
by a **National Science Foundation**
Yes, that's what they meant; the idea being, if it was really fusion,
there would be deadly radiation that would have killed everyone around.
In addition, if it /were/ to be true, in the hands of the wrong people
could be dangerous for our planet.
My next paragraph in the article was:
I know of a few locations where it would be nice to have passive solar hot
water in the summer. I have noted that a black garden hose in the sun produces
hot water. The hose could be placed on a roof. The problem is getting this
heat into a storage tank passively. The hot water tank would
How about keeping the tank on the roof and using a thermosiphon [1] or,
better still, a passive vapor heat pipe [2] to transfer heat to the tank
from a collector below? The height difference between the collector and the
tank would only have to be a foot or two and you'd want the tank on the
roof
Cold Fusion Now website is temporarily unavailable as we are changing
hosting services.
If you are trying to acccess the link I posted about Brillouin Energy,
you will not be able to see it at this time.
I'm not sure how long it will be down, but if all goes smoothly (ha!),
it shouldn't
Godes probably wouldn't agree. Fwiw, he seems to be an advocate of an
electron capture kind of hypothesis as opposed to a fusion kind of
hypothesis.
Electron capture hypotheses roughly substitute the miracle of coming up
with a missing ~0.8MeV (along with some quantum mumbo jumbo) for the
miracle
Is there any fluid that sinks when heated?
Frank Znidarsic
Doubt it since it would hint at suppressed vibrational modes - OTOH - there
is one candidate that I know of - a complex sugar molecule that turns solid
on heating, and then reverts to liquid on cooling.
All sounds good, but maybe their wire keeps breaking...
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
The technologies of Godes, PDGTG, Rossi and Celani will all be well served
if they converged.
To start off with, Godes should distress the surface of his wire to take
In reply to fznidar...@aol.com's message of Tue, 18 Sep 2012 19:42:46 -0400
(EDT):
Hi,
[snip]
I know of a few locations where it would be nice to have passive solar hot
water in the summer. I have noted that a black garden hose in the sun
produces hot water. The hose could be placed on a
Frank,
The problem is getting this heat into a storage tank passively. The hot
water tank would have to be mounted higher than the hose. I would like to
employ the ordinary basement hot water tank. Hot water rises and will not
go down to the basement tank.
Here is an idea for a system where
Thanks all. The sugar thing might work in some kind of heat pipe. I am looking
for an cheep solution with a hose and an existing hot water tank. A tee in the
drain line of the tank that then proceeds out the cellar door with a 1/2 white
and 1/2 black circulating loop would work. I don't like
What about this? I run a black and white hose up the sunny side of the house
from the basement. The bottom of the circulating loop is lower than the tank.
I splice the bottom of the loop in with a T that connects to the tank drain.
Frank
43 matches
Mail list logo
