When it comes to entanglement. distance from the origin of the entanglement
is not cogent. The entangled particles can be on opposite side of the
universe and still be connected.
The strange thing about Holmlid's experiments is that Holmlid produces
billions of high energy particles that all
From: Axil Axil
Proposition: "However if there is muon decay at all - they should be seeing a
signal at 511 keV."
* Detection of radiation is not applicable to the LENR sensing
application because LENR thermalize any radiation emitting in a wide zone
around the LENR reaction. If this
Proposition: "However if there is muon decay at all - they should be seeing
a signal at 511 keV."
Detection of radiation is not applicable to the LENR sensing application
because LENR thermalize any radiation emitting in a wide zone around the
LENR reaction. If this were not so, Holmlid and Rossi
Axil - That is an interesting point and it is worth following up on - since
muon decay is so energetic that even a tiny anisotropy could amount to the
small differential on the null side. However if there is muon decay at all -
they should be seeing a signal at 511 keV.
It would be easy to
@Jones
This possible heat production by the dummy is a interesting and not well
appreciated complication of Muon production.
If muons are produced by the active reactor, they could be producing heat
in the dummy reactor.
The heater could be producing a axial magnetic field the pushes most of
Another possibility is the conduction of alumina. Alan has measured the
electrical conductivity of alumina to increase rapidly above 900C. The
heater coils are wound directly on the mullite reactor tube and they are
covered with thick alumina tubes. When the outer cover alumina tube is
over
Another strange possibility to consider – with which to account for lower than
expected performance on the active side, and in fact the null side being
slightly warmer for a unexpected proportion of the time is this: the null side
could be active as well in a lower temperature range.
Here is a video, queued to the time shortly after the green (active)
thermocouple became hotter than the purple (control) thermocouple. The
control had been running a couple of degrees hotter, previously. The
change-over occurred shortly after raising the power to the point where
the
This temperature differential is more meaningful than it seems since some of
the excess heat on the active side goes to heat the null side.
The basic concept of comparative calorimetry is good, and this ceramic is not a
great conductor of heat, but there is a conductive pathway between the
The optical imager is typically reading between an 18c and 20c difference.
Craig
On 04/16/2016 11:03 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
Interesting. I hope a post-run calibration shows that when the fuel
is removed, the active and null outside temperatures return to one
another to within experimental
Interesting. I hope a post-run calibration shows that when the fuel is
removed, the active and null outside temperatures return to one another to
within experimental uncertainty. This will be critical to show before
concluding anything.
Eric
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Craig Haynie
60c on the latest...
https://youtu.be/VLK19pllG9g?t=6278
On 04/16/2016 10:53 AM, Eric Walker wrote:
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:01 AM, CB Sites > wrote:
I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they
had a delta T of 30C
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 2:01 AM, CB Sites wrote:
I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a delta
> T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for hours, until I
> gave up.
>
At what time in the video did you see this? When I skipped
How does one calculate the margin of error for the temperature?
When I look at the calibration data, I can calculate the standard
deviation between the temperatures for the entire calibration run at
1.5%. If I compare the difference in the thermocouples during the actual
run, then 50c
Now 60c
On 04/16/2016 07:19 AM, Craig Haynie wrote:
Now 50c.
On 04/16/2016 03:01 AM, CB Sites wrote:
I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a
delta T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for
hours, until I gave up.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at
Now 50c.
On 04/16/2016 03:01 AM, CB Sites wrote:
I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a
delta T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for
hours, until I gave up.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Che
I have to say. This one is pretty fascinating. At 1000+C they had a delta
T of 30C between a fueled and unfueled cell that lasted for hours, until I
gave up.
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Che wrote:
>
>
>
>
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GfAJv-jhCY8=em-lbcastemail-np
18 matches
Mail list logo