Hi,
In some discussion we discussed about the fact that majority of physicist
deny LENR reality.
It seems clear that 99% of opinion on LENR are just 3nd hand opinion, ie
jus parroting what colleagues or media say.
People like me have 2nd hand opinion, based on reading documents, and
hearing 1st
Hi Ruby,
I have been proposing a relativistic interpretation of casimir
effect and all VanderWall based forces like Lamb Shift and spontaneous
emissions.. that is to say that a Puthoff based perspective of all physical
matter balanced by vacuum wavelengths can be modified by
Hi all,
Maybe you remember of the battle to make Lenuco (George Miley) get
nominated for a Future Energy Ultra Light Startups contest. We lose but we
lose avec panache.
LENR Cars have just been selected to compete in the in the Future Energy
online pitching contest organized by Ultra Light
Dave, I've asked our question on phsyics.stackexchange.com -- here's what
has come back so far:
http://physics.stackexchange.com/q/87047/6713
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:44 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
As I have mentioned on occasions, I see plenty of evidence that both forms
(X)od is the next big thing.
(X)od goes beyond mere AI (artificial intelligence) into the holy world of
Capitalism, where it is device-free, voice-and-thought controlled and
totally ensconced in the cloud ... but as a must have service which is
personalized to every customer.
Needless to say
Charlie Sheen will have the upgraded (XXX)pod traveling companion :)
On Tuesday, November 19, 2013, Jones Beene wrote:
(X)od is the next big thing.
(X)od goes beyond mere AI (artificial intelligence) into the holy world of
Capitalism, where it is device-free, voice-and-thought controlled and
I read the responses and find the answers to have varying degrees of relevance.
So far we have not followed closely what an outside observer measures. At
this point, I agree with SR and GR that other observers looking at the
spaceship will see that it moves at a velocity that does not exceed
Dave,
To me it appears you are making two assumptions, which is OK but should be
qualified
1). Space is empty and not full of energetic particles/cosmic rays that
will penetrate and decay you and ruin your trip
2) Time actually exists and is not really just a rate of decay, ie on Earth
we all
How exactly is this spoof? This is precisely what Smartphones / Google
Glass are all about.
Perhaps you skipped a few steps, but it's the end game. The merging of
the human mind with the computational substrate.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 7:42 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
(X)od
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/files/Math%20Lessons%20-%20Prof.Sergio%20Focardi.pdf
This is likes a Schaum's outline math reference in Italian. I don't think
there is anything useful here, but I could be proven wrong.
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 3:00 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
This is very basic mathematics, in terms of what is required for physics or
engineering course.
2013/11/19 Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.com
This is likes a Schaum's outline math reference in Italian. I don't think
there is anything useful here, but I could be proven wrong.
On Tue, Nov
I'm getting a 403 Forbidden when I try to follow that link - can
anyone send me a copy of the pdf?
Thanks,
Andy.
On 19/11/13 20:10, Bob Higgins wrote:
This is likes a Schaum's outline math reference in
Italian. I don't think there is
Perhaps hot-linking is not allowed on the server.. Or it was changed
to a zip file.
Go to this page, and click the download link button.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=821
- Brad
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:35 PM, Andy Findlay andy_find...@orange.net wrote:
I'm getting a 403
Thanks to both Brad and Ian - I've got it.
Andy.
On 19/11/13 22:16, Brad Lowe wrote:
Perhaps hot-linking is not allowed on the server.. Or it was changed
to a zip file.
Go to this page, and click the download link button.
http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=821
- Brad
On Tue, Nov
I do not know of any prominent, published skeptics who have observed
positive experiments.
Steve Jones did experiments, as you noted, but they did not work. Kamikande
was a good example. Richard Garwin often attacks cold fusion in public, but
when he visited SRI and saw a positive experiment, he
Free Kindle book today on promotion at Amazon.
http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddigital-textfield-keywords=%22znidarsic+science+books%22rh=n%3A133140011%2Ck%3A%22znidarsic+science+books%22
Frank
This is pretty much over my head, but I'm kinda following you... :-)
I just hope a technology comes out of this research.
There's alot o waste to clean up.
On 11/19/13 4:41 AM, Roarty, Francis X wrote:
My interpretation of LENT is that the radioactive particles that are
contained in the
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 12:10 PM, Bob Higgins rj.bob.higg...@gmail.comwrote:
This is likes a Schaum's outline math reference in Italian. I don't think
there is anything useful here, but I could be proven wrong.
It was a strange thing indeed to put up a link to that. The math is basic,
and I
It would seem that in the real science community, opposition is a bit of a
paper tiger.
Didn't Jones go out of his way to fight recent funding for experiments at
MIT?
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
I do not know of any prominent, published skeptics
On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 8:38 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
Note that he did not mention the context, and we infer that it is LENR.
Very enigmatic.
***Rossi recently posted that he's no longer CEO, he is CTO of the
company. Some of his new responsibilities will be to publish
http://coldfusionnow.org/vote-for-lenr-cars-now/
Nicolas Chauvin definitely needs more votes!
http://futureenergy.ultralightstartups.com/campaign/detail/1864
--
Ruby Carat
r...@coldfusionnow.org
Skype ruby-carat
www.coldfusionnow.org
22 matches
Mail list logo
