*That means interactions with other parts of the nucleus are possible, but
not with other atoms*
I took this to mean that cluster fusion could not happen because of the
speed of light.
My point, quantum mechanics allows cluster fusion to occur regardless of
the speed of light.
On Sat, Sep 13,
I wish this would have happened in time for me to win the FQXI Essay
contest.
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 5:14 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 12:09 AM, Kevin O'Malley kevmol...@gmail.com
wrote:
*Thinking Big Is The Easy Part: My Weekend Dreaming Up The Next
I just wonder whether they took into account that Tungsten at 2000K and 1
Torr likely absorbs Hydrogen.
Absorption of Hydrogen into metal lattices is an exothermic mechanism.
Nothing mentioned in their report.
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting
You take seriously the Gamberale and dismiss the demo.
Backflow- at minimal flow values can cause some errors . OK how great t
these errors can be at normal flow values?
OK, look to the important things:
1- the spark plugs begin to work thr reaction is reiggered, in short time
out put jumps from
All I see is self-indulgent hype and pampered rich people (not that there’s
anything wrong with that when they are giving away something). Where are the
entry rules ?
Why could Dennis Craven’s not enter and possibly win it with a new version of
the NI-Week demo?
From: Kevin O'Malley
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Why could Dennis Craven’s not enter and possibly win it with a new version
of the NI-Week demo?
That would be sweet! He sure would deserve to win.
I loved that demo. I even get the impression that I am more impressed by it
than Cravens himself. That
Dear Friends,
I keep my promises- this is the 7th LENR miniature written this
end-of-vacation week.
It is about a book you will be able to read most probably
in July next year:
http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2014/09/why-i-must-write-book-about-uehmdi.html
Please overwhelm me with advises.
If equilibrium conditions were met shouldn't the contribution of heat
from adsorption vanish?
Harry
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 6:25 AM, Teslaalset robbiehobbiesh...@gmail.com
wrote:
I just wonder whether they took into account that Tungsten at 2000K and 1
Torr likely absorbs Hydrogen.
From: Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote:
Why could Dennis Craven’s not enter and possibly win it with
a new version of the NI-Week demo?
* That would be sweet! He sure would deserve to win.
* I loved that
If epicatalysis systems exist which can produce a higher temperature from
just ambient temperature without any additional input power then COP in
terms of heat output is infinity which is meaningless.
By analogy applying the COP measure to a naturally occurring waterfall
gives infinity...except
Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
With most other
demos I have been less impressed than the person doing the demo.
I can see your point, but my impression is not that he is unimpressed, but
that he realizes the similarity to Arata, which also was understated . . .
Arata's
See:
http://www.nytimes.com/2014/09/14/science/earth/sun-and-wind-alter-german-landscape-leaving-utilities-behind.html
Some quotes:
HELIGOLAND, Germany — Of all the developed nations, few have pushed harder
than Germany to find a solution to global warming. And towering symbols of
that drive
Wow. Can’t keep the two threads separated… $20 million to the winner ? Nice
incentive.
It might be fun to merge this thread into the X-Prize thread, with the aim of
framing a system which would look a little like Sheehan’s and a little like
Cravens’, with Arata and Ahern thrown in for good
In our fusion legislation, endorsed by Bussard, there was provision, Sec.
903.a.6 to support fusion researchers for 5 years at their current levels
of compensation, with no obligation on their part.
If the stakes are high enough you can easily afford that kind of disruption
of rent seekers.
On
http://www.oocities.org/jim_bowery/BussardsLetter/legislation4.jpg
On Sun, Sep 14, 2014 at 1:00 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
In our fusion legislation, endorsed by Bussard, there was provision, Sec.
903.a.6 to support fusion researchers for 5 years at their current levels
of
This is a theory paper that is available on their website
which isn't linked to on MFMP website
:
Epicatalysis:
Nonequilibrium Heterogeneous Catalysis in the Long Mean Free Path Regime
http://jointheparadigm.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/EpicatalPRE.pdf
quote
It is curious that
Suppose epicatalysis can cycle between hydrogen and shrunken hydrogen
instead of just between H2 and H.
Harry
On Sat, Sep 13, 2014 at 4:15 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
YES!
Thanks for posting this, Harry. Epicatalysis is a good name for a more
general phenomenon which can
From: H Veeder
Suppose epicatalysis can cycle between hydrogen and shrunken hydrogen instead
of just between H2 and H.
That would be the logical progression to Mills’ view, especially if UV was
present - except RM sez there is no shuttling, just a one-way, but strongly
bonded shrunken
Actually, my use of the term 'equilibrium' is probably technically
incorrect in this situation since they say the systems they study are
non-equilibrium stationary systems. What I mean is that if enough time
passed then any heat associated with absorption would spread throughout the
system and
I've had a chance to revisit the earlier model of photon transmission from
the E-Cat through various media and incorporate some new features. Now
decay half-lives and detector efficiency are factored in. Here is what I'm
seeing for 1cm of nickel:
Photons from a total of 7e+14 transitions per
20 matches
Mail list logo
