RE: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

"LRL" = "LGL"? I assume you miss keyed "R" as "G". From: Daniel Rocha > I posted above, but, here it goes again :) > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%E2%80%93Runge%E2%80%93Lenz_vector#Derivation_of_the_Kepler_orbits

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

Yes! ^_^'" 2016-05-24 21:30 GMT-03:00 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net>: > "LRL" = "LGL"? > > I assume you miss keyed "R" as "G". > > From: Daniel Rocha >

RE: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

My math background, particularly use of proper math terminology, is somewhat elementary at times. Recently, I have taken several refresher courses in calculus. It's been an interesting experience. I was not familiar with the term "Laplace–Runge–Lenz vectors". I may have shorthanded the term,

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

I have other projects! But if I have to suggest anything is to try to find Kepler's law using LGL vectors in the simplest way. 2016-05-24 19:08 GMT-03:00 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net>: > > You're working on a third way? >

RE: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

What does "LGL" stand for? >From Daniel: > I have other projects! But if I have to suggest anything is to try to > find Kepler's law using LGL vectors in the simplest way.

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

I posted above, but, here it goes again :) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%E2%80%93Runge%E2%80%93Lenz_vector#Derivation_of_the_Kepler_orbits 2016-05-24 20:37 GMT-03:00 OrionWorks - Steven Vincent Johnson < orionwo...@charter.net>: > What does "LGL" stand for? > -- Daniel Rocha - RJ

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

Jed, ""[Vo]:1 MW of heat in a 6,500 sq. ft. facility without industrial ventilation would be fatal"" Why did you set up that straw man in the first place?Is your source Dewey Weaver?I see he earlier wrote many of the same things you have. As I said, the Rossi affair reminds me of

RE: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen.

On Mon 5/23 Jones said [snip] The theory that appeals to me the most is not Holmlid's but the one of Lawandy. In that theory, there must be a dielectric support for UDH, which is always paired.[/snip] which also fits nicely with lack of hydrinos available for study and Mill's reliance on

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

what seems unavoidable is that IH was unable to replicate. Question is if they could not replicate anything, or just replicate something usable. Fraud is not even a problem if it works for IH. Doubt on methodology is also a problem with a test. Dubious behavior is also a possible problem,

Re: [Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen.

If I understand right, this idea from Lawandy seems compatible with some recent posts by Ecco on Quantum Heat so I think you may have something there. It will be interesting to see where it goes. > On 23 May 2016, at 19:13, Jones Beene wrote: > > The answer to these

[Vo]:Lithium ION bricking

I used to, in the 70's, work with battery powered mining equipment. You could tell when the battery was dying. The equipment slowed down and it was time to charge it up. A ruined lead acid cell appears like an open circuit. I have found out, through the school of hard knocks, that lithium

Re: [Vo]:Some questions about H(1) ultra dense hydrogen.

Thanks for pointing me towards these theories Jones Beene I will try to take a look at them. I have a few other questions about H(0) and D(0) to add to my earlier list if I may: If the two nuclei are separated by 2.3 pm I suppose the are rotating about their center of mass. Would those

[Vo]:Lithium ION bricking

I built a lithium ion powered bicycle to test out the technology. It has a 48 volt 10 AH LI-ion battery with a 2 KW external drive. The lower rated internal drive smoked within a few days. I used a Magic Pie motor. The motor broke free of its torque arm and spun free on its shaft a number

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

Alain Sepeda. "but who cares if the factory is made of hardpaper, if E-cat works in IH labs." If either works it is enough. Anyway it looks like the old E-Cat is passe and the QuarkX is the future. As is too obvious no one knows enough to do more than speculate. Roll on June and more data.

[Vo]:Lithium ION bricking

Frank, I assume you mean MINI (not midi) I used to drive my mother's regular mini as a young man. It went around corners like it was on rails. Some years ago I laid a 240 3ph cable to the front of the house while doing some mods, expecting to get an electric car. We have just got a

RE: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

>From Lennart: > Jed, how come you can repeat your statements but so not have to > verify anything or tell the whole story because some lame excuse. > You basically say that you think your horseshit does not smell. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xx8cCDthsuk Starting around 0:40 to 1:17 Steven

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

Steven, I wish I had Hanks ability to express myself. Fun - did not see the connection though. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically act upon, must inevitably come to pass.

[Vo]:Fwd: Lithium ION bricking

The cold fusion book is still selling within the top 100 of its class. That's were it has been for a long time. Maybe I am have an impact and then again maybe not. http://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/digital-text/159789011?ie=UTF8_=pd_zg_hrsr_kstore_1_6_last#3 Frank Znidarsic

[Vo]:Lithium ION bricking

a.ashfield Thanks, yes it is a MINI and I love it. I had a Corvair Air convertible when I was 16. I loved it. I ran as well as the electric bike, always broke down. In a quest to restore my youth I bought another convertible at 62. It's working with that. The midi (not MINI) is below

RE: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

Harry, I need to remove myself from Vortex again in order to prevent further temptation to commit commentary. I'll return after I have another progress report to make. One thing I've learned about my own R endeavors is that it's taking a LOT longer to manifest than what I had originally

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

Whoops, I sent that before I was finished. I wanted to add that a mathematician named Gary Rubinstein did a nice series of videos explaining Feynman's geometrical derivation of Kepler's laws. No calculus is used because the argument is strictly geometrical. Here is the first of eight videos in

[Vo]:Langmuir/Hydrogen

This source makes an interesting claim: http://www.chavascience.com/index.php/en/hydrogen/langmuir-excess-energy-from-hydrogen That Langmuir was dissuaded from publishing anything that suggested a gain in regard to atomic hydrogen. If true, it confirms my feelings about 'heresy' and

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

Here is another baseball clip, but this one is from the Bad News Bears (1976) https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CWN1xWdKbHY Harry On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 1:37 PM, Daniel Rocha wrote: > It seems to be a meme. Like, a person that cannot handle criticism: >

[Vo]:Time to see LENR as a Whole

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2016/05/may-24-2016-to-see-lenr-field-as-whole.html I consider modesty and, especially humility as semi-qualities and therefore now I dare to say that this subject is important indeed When the time of this idea will come... Peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj,

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

Steven, Your criticisms are quite justified. The problem is I don't know how to pause a gif animation. At this time I didn't expect to leave more than an "impression" so I apologize if the lack of detail frustrated you. Are you familiar with a book called Feynman's Lost Lectures? It is based on

[Vo]:The Rossi Saga Part 1

Various threads have sprung up making it difficult to follow the Rossi story.I propose we start with part 1 and add more as it gets too long. Here is the best description of details of the 1 MW plant from Mats Lewan https://animpossibleinvention.com/blog/ * All the instruments for

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

It seems to be a meme. Like, a person that cannot handle criticism: http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=There%27s%20no%20crying%20in%20baseball Or maybe it means that Tom Hanks got a brain damage during Forest Gump and after it only played characters that are way, way too serious.

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

Newton's derivation of the force of gravity from Kepler's law of ellipsis is explained nicely in this series of lectures: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLB3D1F0F64E98FDBF Daniel Rocha - RJ danieldi...@gmail.com

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

Hmm! Gary also derived using the original method, so it is good to see both approaches and how algebra makes life so much easier than just using geometric algebra. In Newton's time, though, geometric algebra was widely teach, more so than algebra, including theorems about ellipsis which are not as

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

I'm sorry, orbits. You could try to find the law using it.

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

There is also the LRL vector, which can be used to derive Kepler's law in 3 lines: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laplace%E2%80%93Runge%E2%80%93Lenz_vector#Derivation_of_the_Kepler_orbits

Re: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

Yes, it is possible to begin with kepler's laws and the law of inertia and derive the force law of gravity or to begin with the force law of gravity and the law of inertia and derive Kepler's laws. I am working on third way. Harry On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 3:05 PM, Daniel Rocha

RE: [Vo]:Dear Johannes

Woah! I didn't expect to see so much commentary on this particular thread. I had to re-subscribe a while longer. Harry, the link you supplied on Feynman's Lost Lecture on Motions around the Sun did the trick for me. I finally get what your animated GIF was trying to tell me. I like what

Re: [Vo]:Rossi vs I.H.

Daniel that did not make it clear to me. I can take critic. I just think throwing rocks when you sit in a glasshouse is less than smart. Best Regards , Lennart Thornros lenn...@thornros.com +1 916 436 1899 Whatever you vividly imagine, ardently desire, sincerely believe and enthusiastically