A lot of the keyboard banging could be avoided if folks would simply
preface their comments with 3 attributes:
Business vs Science viewpoint
Circumstantial vs Direct evidence
Guilt vs Innocence presumption
For instance, if someone has $2M in their retirement account and they're
thinking about
Can't you just ban this noise-box, Jed?
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 9:46 AM, Mary Yugo maryyu...@gmail.com wrote:
The pseudoskeptics continually assert that their criticism of those who
are investigating Rossi's claims has nothing to do with whether Pons and
Fleischmann had any validity to their
In the tradition of Alan Fletcher's exemplary skepticism:
If the pressure at the output thermocouple of the Oct 28 demo exceeds the
critical pressure of steam at the reported temperature, then there is no
heat of vaporization represented in the mass flow hence in the imputed
power level.
We may
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Can't you just ban this noise-box, Jed?
I can't ban anyone.
Then that ends that discussion.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 11:56 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
2011/11/15 James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
If the pressure at the output thermocouple of the Oct 28 demo exceeds the
critical pressure of steam at the reported temperature, then there is no
heat of vaporization
) is to feedback from temperature to the heat-transport
medium's mass flow rate.
If there is no such control then I can't conceive of how the temperature is
stabilized.
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:36 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:18 PM, James Bowery jabow
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
On 11-11-15 10:31 AM, James Bowery wrote:
The pseudoskeptics continually assert that their criticism of those who
are investigating Rossi's claims has nothing to do with whether Pons and
Fleischmann had any validity
What controls the temperature in the E-Cat's self-sustained mode?
I had presumed that all the work Rossi did to go from resistivity heated
temperature control to self-sustained temperature control was geared around
feedback of the temperature to the heat transport mass flow rate. I didn't
have
wrote:
skeptical viewpoints re Rossi: John Pasquarette: Rich Murray 2011.11.11
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 6:24 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
What controls the temperature in the E-Cat's self-sustained mode?
I had presumed that all the work Rossi did to go from resistivity heated
, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
This doesn't apply to the reaction chamber itself if we presume Rossi's
temperature-enhanced reaction rate is in play there. Regardless of how the
pressure changes or what the phase mixture is, the temperature will
continue to rise and the power level
repeated assertions
that reaction rate increases with temperature).
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:13 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:05 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
This doesn't apply to the reaction chamber itself if we presume Rossi's
Ooops... my intuition screwed up on this one:
Since the effective specific heat does not remain constant with temperature
-- there is a discontinuous rise at the boiling point -- there is a
dramatic rise in the effective heat transport with temperature at the
boiling point (whatever it is for the
By the way, this means that if the water in the reactor vessel is under
enough pressure, the water pressure can be very high. This means, in turn,
that if it goes through a pressure drop, it can be completely vaporized --
indeed superheated steam.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:56 AM, James Bowery
substantial prior to the thermocouple, resulting in a dry --
even superheated -- steam.
So my originally post problem of estimating the pressure at the output
thermocouple still stands as critical in invalidating the Oct 28
demonstration.
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:23 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:12 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
OK, I've now conceived of how the temperature is stabilized without
feedback control, and it doesn't require anything like mixed phase flow
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:19 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
That's true if there is no latent heat of vaporization represented in the
liquid water. With careful setting of the water flow rate, one can
approach vaporization within the reactor vessel without any actual
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 12:41 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I recall the manometer registered 3 bar, which is 300kPa which corresponds
to a potential liquid water temperature of 130C at the exit from the
reaction vessel. This doesn't leave him a lot of room to play with before
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 10:11 AM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
**
On 11-11-16 08:59 AM, James Bowery wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
On 11-11-15 10:31 AM, James Bowery wrote:
The pseudoskeptics continually assert
Examining the condenser, the condenser channels are horizontal pipes in a
vertical array. It _appears_ as though each of 7 channels does one
round-trip, returning on the pipe just below. One channel would look like:
___ Inflowing vapor
(___ Outflowing
Is there a plausible explanation for why the temperature at which reaction
initiates in the E-Cat just happens to be so close to the boiling point of
water?
A NiH system doesn't bear any particular relationship to water that I can
see.
Is this a big scientific coincidence/serendipity or is there
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:57 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
At 11:32 AM 11/16/2011, James Bowery wrote:
Is there a plausible explanation for why the temperature at which
reaction initiates in the E-Cat just happens to be so close to the boiling
point of water?
Mostly coincidence
Erratum: One channel - The seven channels
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 1:21 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Examining the condenser, the condenser channels are horizontal pipes in a
vertical array. It _appears_ as though each of 7 channels does one
round-trip, returning on the pipe
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 9:02 AM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 7:59 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
The pseudoskeptics are basically saying that all we have to do is look at
the circumstantial evidence to know that even cursory investigation
Steorn is not stating anything about the input power requirements for their
HephaHeat product in that product's web pages. The personal communication
about 1kW was made regarding a FaceBook video of a device that might be
construed to be related but is not claimed to be related by the Steorn
This is a good example of why circumstantial evidence should be the last
resort. Who can deny that Rossi was indicted and tried? Who can deny that
the Italian government is corrrupt? Most importantly, how do you weigh the
virtually unlimited bits and pieces of circumstantial evidence against
There have been many complaints about the US patent office refusing to
grant anything that smacks of cold fusion ever since the mid 1990s.
Patterson was, I believe, the last person to be granted a patent and he is
now dead.
Does anyone have a cite for an official communication from the USPTO
Here is a search of uspto.gov for cold fusion:
http://goo.gl/groRG
I think this hit indicates that the formal stance is that despite it being
incredible technology, cold fusion should be evaluated on the basis of
utility:
Examples of such cases include: ... a cold fusion process for producing
While it is almost certainly the case that by the time you take delivery in
or about 2013, the most critical questions surrounding the E-Cat will have
been answered, it is also almost certainly the case that Rossi will reach
the 10,000 customer waiting list before those questions have been
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 9:43 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh well . . . the first reliable historical report of airplane flight was
published in Gleanings in Bee Culture by Amos Root, in 1905. Still
published:
http://www.beeculture.com/
Now only in archive.com:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
MIT? How is that possible. MIT is the epicenter of the anti-cold fusion
conspiracy...
Now THAT's hilarious!
With one hand MIT was trashing Fleischmann and Pons and with the other hand
they were simultaneously bolting
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 2:27 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.comwrote:
James Bowery wrote:
With one hand MIT was trashing Fleischmann and Pons and with the other
hand they were simultaneously bolting out
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 5:01 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone was kind enough to dig up this document:
http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/documents/2100_2107_01.htm
-- Forwarded message --
From: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
Date: Mon, Nov 21
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Joshua Cude joshua.c...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Stephen A. Lawrence sa...@pobox.comwrote:
**
MIT? How is that possible. MIT is the epicenter of the anti-cold fusion
conspiracy...
If they're the epicenter of the conspiracy
My question: Did Sen. Bruce Tarr ask Rossi any questions to which Rossi
provided surprising (to B. Tarr) answers?
When an attorney calls a witness, he knows the answers before he asks the
questions. The same applies to public hearings where an elected official
invests his political capital in
The last book published by Intel founder Andrew S.
Grovehttp://www.amazon.com/Andrew-S.-Grove/e/B000AQ48KWwas titled
Only the Paranoid Survive.
Senility or experience?
Chapter 5 (page 107) of the 2011 doctoral thesis Numerical Simulation of
Tornado-like
Vorticeshttp://vortexengine.ca/cfd/Diwakar_Natarajan_Full_thesis.pdf
by
Diwakar Natarajan concludes that cross-winds do not affect the power
generation capacity of the AVE, but it appears that this is only with
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:42 AM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.comwrote:
The big cost difference between E-Cat technology and conventional
technologies will of course be the fuel cost. The fuel cost for a one
megawatt cold fusion planet will probably be at least 1/1000 times less
than one
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:42 AM, noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.comwrote:
The big cost difference between E-Cat technology and conventional
technologies will of course be the fuel cost. The fuel cost for a one
Although the kill file approach doesn't work due to responses, one can
use email filters such as gmail's to filter not only on the from field
but on words that occur in the body of the message.
The increase in signal to noise ratio is a pleasure.
Oh, I almost forgot: For gmail, the action to take upon filter match is
delete. Others won't get rid of the noise.
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 12:32 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Although the kill file approach doesn't work due to responses, one can
use email filters such as gmail's
series claims?
--
Date: Sun, 27 Nov 2011 11:07:33 -0600
Subject: Re: [Vo]:E-Cats and 450 deg C steam
From: jabow...@gmail.com
To: thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
CC: vortex-l@eskimo.com
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 11:01 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Nov
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 5:18 PM, Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.comwrote:
With GMail, it is better to reduce noise by searching unvanted people and
keywords and mark them automatically as read.
I tried that, but Gmail organizes things in conversations that includes
read messages in the
This waterspout video seems to support the laminar hypothesis.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hN7ug1zoWWE
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 10:02 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Chapter 5 (page 107) of the 2011 doctoral thesis Numerical Simulation of
Tornado-like
Vorticeshttp
Indeed, there is a similar phenomenon over land known as landspouts that
are known to be laminar.
It looks like Natarajan screwed up.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 9:07 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
This waterspout video seems to support the laminar hypothesis.
http://www.youtube.com
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
...There is precedent for this. In 1917, the United States wanted to begin
large-scale mass production of aircraft for World War I. The industry was
hamstrung by patent fights especially by the original patent which had
This morning, I ran across a truly classy cold fusion joke appearing in
Charles Beaudette's book Excess Heat in that book's appendix: The
Internet Noise Level written as a letter to Dr. I. M. Noteworthy. I was
delighted to see Beaudette's association of the word noise with
internet regarding cold
Since codeposition of Pd/D seems to be one of the better ways to get
reproducible PF effects, and there has been a lot of work done in
electrodeposition of Ni, with the inevitable result of Ni/H codeposition,
where are the reports of anomalous heat in the world of Ni electrolysis?
into nickel nano-powder.
- Strong Coulomb barrier masking.
- Gamma Radiation thermalization, mitigation, and prevention.
Industry standard electrodeposition of Ni does none of these key things.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:57 AM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Since codeposition
notice excess heat?
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 12:58 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Uh, I'm not talking about the E-Cat. I'm talking about a huge industry
with a long history.
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 10:39 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
There are three basic things that must
Where can I get small quantities of soluble nickel salts? Nickel chloride
would be fine. Reagent grade would be nice but not absolutely necessary.
Hopefully I won't have a SWAT team of wannabe secret police attack dogs
bashing down my door if I get my mitts on such an obvious threat to
Homeland
Your interpretation of begun should be constrained by the context of the
original question in which begun is contrasted with starting up.
However, your interpretation of begun was not so constrained. I suggest
you restate your argument with that in mind.
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 8:03 AM,
It occurs to me that a since high temperature
electrolysishttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-temperature_electrolysisconverts
steam heat to chemical energy in the form of separate flows of
hydrogen and oxygen, and high temperature fuel
cellshttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solid_oxide_fuel_cellconvert
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 3:40 AM, Aussie Guy E-Cat
aussieguy.e...@gmail.comwrote:
I have no idea of what it is but it is not an imaging fault as it was
observed by another solar satellite.
Yes it is.
Look at the video taken from the opposite side of Mercury. If it was a
real object, it would
With the DoE consistently opposing funding of cold fusion research it is
clear that if Rossi let's his e-Cat out of the bag, it will benefit Ron
Paul, who has most visibly and consistently over time opposed the existence
of the DoE.
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 2:52 AM, noone noone
As the theocracy unravels, opportunities for reform may present themselves.
We can hope that such Reformation is not as bloody as that which
followed Galileo but the modern era has given rise to much worse phenomena
in reaction to calcified institutions, such as Pol Pot's Khmer
A young Nebraska farmer's son went to war against Germany and came back
with code-breaking skills, as well as good DoD contacts. His name was
William Norris. He started Control Data Corporation with a young engineer
named Seymour Cray and, with 34 people out on Seymour's farm in Wisconsin
(only
1000C input temperature can achieve 50% Carnot efficiency with an exhaust
temperature of 362C
Not quite hot enough for input to MHD
;-)
On Fri, Dec 30, 2011 at 12:05 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
At 01:31 AM 12/30/2011, Aussie Guy E-Cat wrote:
The war against the phrase cold fusion seems to derive from some sort
of attempt at spin control on the whole affair. At some level, if the
phrase cold fusion can be debunked then the physics establishment can
save face in the eyes of the vast majority of the population. It is that
concern that
If there were a movie portraying a world made continually overcast by the
environmental engineering of vampires so they could rule the world and keep
humans as livestock -- and the sun breaking through anyway to burn them all
alive as the climax, then we would be onto something. Short of that,
A founder of the US Tokamak program proposed just that in 1995:
http://www.oocities.org/jim_bowery/BussardsLetter.html
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 12:06 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com wrote:
It would be interesting if a form of X-Prize was set up to reward the
group that reaches an
He's off by a factor of ten on the amount of money that has been spent on
hot fusion research.
The assertion that the theory is now known is nonsense. It may be that
one of the many theories out there is correct, but that doesn't mean it is
known which of those theories it is.
On Sun, Jan 1,
On Sun, Jan 1, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
However, Defkalion spokesman Alexandros Xanthoulis told Swedish science
magazine NyTeknik that they know exactly what the catalyst is. In a piece
of subterfuge, a spectroscopic examination was carried out on an E-Cat
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 12:27 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In Brian Ahern's work on the Arata effect, which... is NOT
the F-P effect
So we're witness to not one, but TWO miracles of energy production that
just happen to involve hydrogen-metal systems?
One miracle is enough to
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
In short, forget the bogus two miracle argument.
Sure I'll forget the bogus two miracle argument -- especially since I
never encountered it.
As for the valid two miracle argument, its not going to go away simply
because
On Sat, Jan 7, 2012 at 7:42 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
You say: D+D = He4 reaction involves two pairs of fermions and even
accuse me of 'forgetting' something.
Where are these two pairs fermions of which you speak ? What did I forget?
Where are two pairs of anything?
Two
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
In our everyday world of illusion, a miracle is a highly improbable event.
But in the real world of quantum mechanics (QM), if it can happen, it will
happen, but just not very often.
That is a sense of the word miracle that
On Sun, Jan 8, 2012 at 2:09 AM, Axil Axil janap...@gmail.com wrote:
So if you back off the details a little ways and look at the generalize QM
mechanism, the D+D reaction is still caused by QM entanglement and
coherence---see Dr. Kim references section in the following:
properties. The difference in physical and nuclear properties
between the two (D and H) is staggering – far more pronounced than two
elements in the same column of the periodic table, such as nickel and
palladium, for instance.
** **
Jones
(see footnote)
*From:* James Bowery
Something that occurs to me about the emergence of a negative coefficient
of temperature at high loading of hydrogen in metallic lattices is that it
may be related to the stress imposed by that loading. If stress reaches a
point where charge carriers to emerge, then increasing the temperature may
I think Charles Beaudette did a beautiful job of describing the
pathological science of the establishment as the modern equivalent of
scholars of Galileo's time refusing to look through Galileo's telescope.
The studied ignorance of the excess heat data by modern establishment
scholars, due to its
Its always nice to separate myth from fact. Even though myth may possess
more truth at times, it is also true that those who would deceive
frequently rely on historical docudrama to abuse the power of myth.
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery
The only way to get capitalism to work is to shift the tax base from
economic activity to the liquidation value of assets, and set the tax rate
to the interest rate used to calculate liquidation value.
But no one with wealth wants that to happen even though just about everyone
who has high
Ever since talk began about increasing cathodic charge carriers emerging
with temperature at high loadings I've been trying to recall the name of
the early researcher who attached an anode directly to his cathode as well
as having an anode in the electrolyte, and I finally found the cite in
Excess
on by others back then - can only have
been because other researchers either didn't hear about it, or didn't think
it was credible.
On 12 January 2012 15:09, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Ever since talk began about increasing cathodic charge carriers emerging
with temperature at high
I should add that I _did_ attempt to find Preparata's original paper online
and was unable to do so.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:37 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I got double-whammied:
1) It was Beaudette that said 100,000 watts per cm^3 (that string is
outside
Has anyone even tried to replicate Preparata's configuration that he claims
he successfully reproduced FIFTY TIMES???
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
I should add that I _did_ attempt to find Preparata's
HAS ANYONE EVEN ATTEMPTED TO REPLICATE PREPARATA?
Citing Preparata, Guiliano, Everything You Always Wanted to Know About
Cold Fusion Calorimetry, (ICCF-6, vol 1, October 13-18, 1996), p. 136
Excess Heat by Charles Beaudette, 2000 edition, p 207:
Preparata ...claims to have obtained *100%
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:51 AM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, we're home. Yawn. Why should it be a surprise, if the answer is no?
Because there do exist some actual scientists.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net wrote:
Yes, but actual scientists need decent funding to do this kind of work.
...
As mentioned in previous postings, palladium has hit $1000/ounce at times
$100 for one foot of 1mm diameter palladium wire
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Jed Rothwell jedrothw...@gmail.com wrote:
James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
$100 for one foot of 1mm diameter palladium wire
http://www.bonanza.com/listings/1-FOOT-PALLADIUM-950-ROUND-WIRE-HH-18-GAUGE-JEWELRY/23681238
This is enough to replicate
BTW: The following should not be taken to mean that I believe most actual
scientists are convinced that pursuit of replication of the Fleischmann
Pons Effect is a moot point. I was merely trying to avert an irrelevant
argument with Jones.
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 1:08 PM, James Bowery jabow
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Mauro Lacy ma...@lacy.com.ar wrote:
**
On 01/11/2012 11:28 PM, James Bowery wrote:
The only way to get capitalism to work is to shift the tax base from
economic activity to the liquidation value of assets, and set the tax rate
to the interest rate used
Although just a kid, I remember being outraged at the Indy 500 committee
for handicapping turbines after Parnelli Jones nearly won in 1967 with his
turbine car.
http://www.autopuzzles.com/Indy1967.htm
On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 6:23 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Jed Rothwell's
Good grief. What is it with the Windom-Larson crowd? I mean while I'm
skeptical that anyone has the theory to explain any of this yet, I will
admit that Windom-Larson may be right. But still, why the religious wars?
What's wrong with these people?
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:02 AM, Jones Beene
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:07 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
At 01:37 PM 1/17/2012, Robert Leguillon wrote:
From Hank Mills - *Pure Energy Systems News*:
Original Source:
http://pesn.com/2012/01/15/9602013_138_Million_Cold_Fusion_Holocaust/
Good grief :
Just imagine that if
This is one reason I focus on promoting Excess Heat: Why Cold Fusion
Research Prevailed by Charles Beaudette.
My own interest in cold fusion was curtailed by my attempt to get a project
going at the Roselle Street offices of Science Applications International
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 11:28 PM, Robert Leguillon
robert.leguil...@hotmail.com wrote:
It should be quite obvious by now, that there are a lot of people being
separated from their money without any product testing...purely as
investors.
Under what pretext? Sales territories?
In the immortal words of Hunter S. Thompson:
WHO SENT YOU?
On Sun, Jan 22, 2012 at 4:23 PM, Dusty Bradshaw d_bra...@bellsouth.netwrote:
I have been having some success heating my house with a device that
consists of unpressurized proteins, sugars, starches, and waters that
undergo heating
Independent Testing on Hyperion Reactors
Praxen Defkalion Green Technologies Global Ltd. (PDGT) is ready to further
allow third parties to evaluate its core technology: a multi stage LENR
reaction between Nickel and Hydrogen.
PDGT has successfully completed its scientific, technological and
The error remains in the 2002 edition.
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 1:37 PM, James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com wrote:
Ah, I got double-whammied:
1) It was Beaudette that said 100,000 watts per cm^3 (that string is
outside of the quotation marks meant to designated Preparata's words.
2) Lynn said
The Antagonists is a better-directed epithet. Although pseudo-skeptics
does capture an important dimension of the crime against humanity, it
doesn't get as close to the heart of the matter. Perhaps a phrase
involving establishment would be even better. The Inquisitors might be
better than The
, or the new chosen-one is to be with us
in these final days ...
From: James Bowery
The Antagonists is a better-directed epithet. Although pseudo-skeptics
does capture an important dimension of the crime against humanity, it
doesn't get as close to the heart of the matter. Perhaps a phrase
The fervor with which W-L adherence advocate that theory is appropriate for
a theory that has been strongly inferred experimentally against the array
of competing theories.
However, I see no such strong inference in evidence.
Assuming nanotech can fabricate structures at the 15nm feature size,
An executive has fiduciary responsibility to his stockholders. This means
he must pursue due diligence regarding the protection of the assets of the
company. Since the USPTO has made the patentability status of cold
fusion claims unclear, for Rossi to expose his trade secret in a patent
From the Washington
Posthttp://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A54964-2004Nov16_2.html
:
Research money has dried up. The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office has
refused to grant a patent on any invention claiming cold fusion. According
to Esther Kepplinger, the deputy commissioner of
At this point Krivit's purpose in life appears to be little more than
damage control for institutional science.
He will fail.
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 12:19 PM, Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course Krivit weights in
http://www.livescience.com/18415-ecat-cold-fusion-fraud.html
I'm attempting to obtain a copy of Production of Helium-Four from
Deuterium Using Nano-Particle Palladium by Russ George, published in the
May 6, 1999 issue of Cold Fusion Times on page 1.
Humans burn calories at a rate greater than 100W. Photosynthesis, in the
best conditions (algae) converts only about 6% of insolation to biomass.
The plants typically used in vertical gardening are more like 1% efficient
at generating biomass, and of that biomass only about 20% is actually
Grammar correction:
Think differently not Think different
PS: They forgot Hitler, Stalin, Mao and Pol Pot just sayin'
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Ron Kita chiralex.k...@gmail.com wrote:
Greetings Vortex,
In case you haven t seen the Youtube the Crazy Ones by Steve Jobs:
Can't be. Rossi's inlet temperature is 524K. With an outlet temperature
at 373K (100C) the maximum Carnot efficiency is only 29%.
On Sun, Feb 26, 2012 at 4:35 PM, Alan Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
SST-040 looks a good candidate : 300kW from 1MW
1 - 100 of 1332 matches
Mail list logo
