frames, iframes and targets become modules in XHTML 1.1. So they
will still be around, but not in the core XHTML DTD.
Fascinating stuff. I had no idea about modules. I'll have to read in
detail before I can claim to understand the whole thing, but at least
it solves the mystery and shows how
Dan,
Nice clean design, I like it. Very usable too, The only comment I
would make would be on the primary Navigation, I feel the colour you
have chosen may lack contrast a little. but other than that, nice
site!
cheers
Chris Thompson
On Mon, 25 Oct 2004 19:03:43 -0500, Daniel Bowling
[EMAIL
I've had this problem too, I resorted to hiding certain rules using
hacks (cringe) helped. This css hack chart is handy.
http://centricle.com/ref/css/filters/
Safari CSS support:
http://developer.apple.com/internet/css/safari_css.html
Nice looking site though.
Chris Thompson
On Tue, 26 Oct
? i didnt know i submitted a site, lol
do u mind if i ask which 1 it gave u?
thanks
dave
-- Original Message --
From: Chris Thompson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 08:37:04 +0100
Dan,
Nice clean design, I like it.
oops, sorry, i didnt see where that signed me up for a discussion group
lol
-- Original Message --
From: Dave Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 03:49:00 -0400
? i didnt know i submitted a site, lol
do u mind if i
I like it. Clean and simple.
IMO, you should include a skip to content link for the screen readers.
~john
_
Dr. Zeus Web Development
http://www.DrZeus.net
content without clutter
Daniel Bowling wrote:
Hello, I would greatly appreciate any feedback for my personal site
I too like the design, I wish I could design like that.
My only comment would be that I think the standard font size is a bit
small.. yes I know you can resize it but a well sighted person
shouldnt have to.
My 50c worth.
--
Todd Baker
http://electronet.com.au - Where electrons go for a good
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 11:42:32 +1000, Michael Kear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
True, Patrick, it's not a teaching tool. But you do need to be able to
find out what is correct if it says it's wrong.
It is not a teaching tool. Using any tool you must have an idea what
it is doing.
That means if
G'day
If you find the output from the validator puzzling and are looking for the
tool to provide clearer answers, suggest you take it up with the people who
provide the tool.
Having said that... The elements, attributes and values are defined in the
DTD (
'About' and 'Accessibility' should be on different pages IMHO, not
everybody wanting to know about 'Accessibility Statement' may like to
read through all of the 'about' page to get there. And there yes
'Accessibility Statement' should stand out on equal footing as 'Skip
to content'.
Other than
Hi, sorry it has taken a while to get back, I have been away.
I am not sure I understand how to solve the problem. I think I am more
confused after reading the bugs for IE5 Mac.
Should I put in my XHTML
div id=clearer/div
then in the CSS
#clearer{clear:none;}
again the page is
On 26 Oct 2004, at 9:37 AM, Natalie Buxton wrote:
Woe is me. It's busted big time. And for the life of me I cannot work
out which CSS rules Safari and IE Mac are refusing to honour.
Two things:
In IE the navigation bar is sitting wrong.
In Safari it's the entire layout is busted big time.
Natalie,
Hi Dan,
It is a nice design, with attractive colors. One thing I would mention
is the main menu text is a little small. One thing I wanted to mention
to people that I learned recently is about LCD monitors vs CRT monitors.
I have both here on my desk, and my CRT is a cheap brand, probably what
a
Hi Steven
I believe this is the paper you are looking for. I included the Dublin Core to
prepare our site for future search engines. I hope SEO benefits will be an added
bonus. It looks like this paper illustrates the added bonus aspect.
is it possible to search in this mailing list archive?
it would save time and resources sometimes
You can search the archive at:
http://webstandardsgroup.org/manage/archive.cfm There is also a
resource search on this page in the bottom right nav.
The resources are also all listed at:
I have been searching for an article I read a while ago on the Dublin Core,
but cannot find it anymore. If I remember correctly it was published by an
SEO group and mentioned that it was very doubtful the Dublin Core would be
accepted as standard, as it has been around for many years and so far
Regarding skip to content links, I found this article recently
about usability testing of screen reader users:
http://www.stcsig.org/usability/newsletter/0304-observing.html
In particular under the 'Many want to skip the navigation, but don't
use that feature' section:
Some developers have
just to clarify:
clear:none means don't clear anything - position this element next
to floated blocks according to normal flow.
clear:left means if this element would normally be positioned next
to a float:left block, put it below the float:left block instead.
clear:right means if this element
What is a standard?:
http://webstandards.org/buzz/archive/2004_10.html#a000463
SiFR - mezzoblue review:
http://www.mezzoblue.com/archives/2004/10/26/sifr/
Clearing Floats - The FnE Method:
http://www.orderedlist.com/articles/clearing_floats_fne
Semantically Correct Knockout Quotes:
Hey team!
Like the rest of you I wish I didn't have to worry about IE.
I do all my dev on a linux box running Firefox 0.10. Needless to say
all my XHTML and CSS looks exactly the way I want it to...then I start
testing in IE...sigh /
http://dev.webdeveloper.co.nz/site/ [The CSS is in the
Greetings!
I penned a bit of a summary of some of the things I learned at WE04,
and Sitepoint have published it!
http://www.sitepoint.com
or straight to the article:
http://www.sitepoint.com/article/essentials-modern-web-design
Did I miss anything imprtant? Well, it's too late now if I did, but
Have you fixed it already? IE6 on WinXP looks the same as Firefox 0.9...
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:13:13 +1300, Darren Wood
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hey team!
Like the rest of you I wish I didn't have to worry about IE.
I do all my dev on a linux box running Firefox 0.10. Needless to say
Same here, tested on Firefox and IE all looks the same (and very nice to boot).
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 15:35:28 +1000, Jason Foss [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you fixed it already? IE6 on WinXP looks the same as Firefox 0.9...
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:13:13 +1300, Darren Wood
[EMAIL
23 matches
Mail list logo
