CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/03/03 18:46:19
Log message:
Revert XDarwin build fix of missing xf86Date.h and instead add hw/xfree86
to include path.
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/include/: Tag: xf-4_3-branch
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/03/03 18:48:04
Log message:
Fix XDarwin build broken by #960 (Shantonu Sen).
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/: Tag: xf-4_3-branch
CHANGELOG
CVSROOT:/home/x-cvs
Module name:xc
Changes by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/03/03 18:53:26
Log message:
Fix XDarwin build broken by #960 (Shantonu Sen).
Modified files:
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/:
CHANGELOG
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/darwin/:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:28:24PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:34:20AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0 or the stuff you are working on ?
What I was working on.
Ok,
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:27:49PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
setjmp is a *macro* (for __sigsetjmp) defined in /usr/include/setjmp.h.
This is libc 2.2. so it doesn't set HAS_GLIBC_SIGSETJMP.
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:27:49PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
setjmp is a *macro* (for __sigsetjmp) defined in /usr/include/setjmp.h.
This is
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 03:53:32PM +, David Woodhouse wrote:
On Fri, 2003-02-28 at 17:31, David Dawes wrote:
Makefile.kernel was supposed to the a Makefile suitable for dropping
into the kernel source tree's drivers/char/drm directory. It's never
All,
Please excuse my ignorance here as I have only been
on this list for a few weeks and am pretty new to XFree86 internals. That
being said ...
I am working on modifying an input driver (or two
:-) and am having a little trouble. I cannot find man pages or other
documentation on
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Stuart Anderson wrote:
On a related matter, in libGLU's mysetjmp.h, there is
inline int
mysetjmp( JumpBuffer *j )
{
return ::setjmp( j-buf );
}
... and something similar for longjmp(). Now my (spoken) C++ is less than
adequate, but
I should note that setting HasGlibc21Sigsetjmp YES doesn't work
for me. It complains about an undefined xf86setjmp when building
xf86sym.c. Yes, I did make World.
Mark.
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 04:27:26PM -0500, Binesh Bannerjee wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi...
I've been trying to compile XFree86-4.3.0 ... And, actually the
_compile_ (make
Hi Guys,
I just noticed that my XFree86 build seems to be building with debug info
enabled. Is that the default when you do an install and 'make World'? How
do you enable an optimised, no debug build by default? I want to build
everything optimised by default and then switch to building just
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Hi Guys,
I just noticed that my XFree86 build seems to be building with debug info
enabled. Is that the default when you do an install and 'make World'? How
do you enable an optimised, no debug build by default? I want to build
everything
Mark Vojkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. All mono bitmap data for glyphs etc appears to be stored in LSB format
internally. A lot of PC hardware is MSB, and XAA bit twiddles the bits
before passing it to the low level layers for hardware that is MSB only.
I am wondering if there is a
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Kendall Bennett wrote:
Mark Vojkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. All mono bitmap data for glyphs etc appears to be stored in LSB format
internally. A lot of PC hardware is MSB, and XAA bit twiddles the bits
before passing it to the low level layers for hardware
Mark Vojkovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So I assume that we will just have to do the bit twiddling on cards that
are MSB only? I guess we can live with that ;-)
There aren't really that many cards that are that way. And all
the ones I can think of suck for other reasons (ie. only
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 08:48:12AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sun, 2 Mar 2003, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 08:27:49PM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
setjmp is a *macro* (for __sigsetjmp) defined in
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I just noticed that if I use a large root window cursor it doesn't
work anymore. Actually I see a brief flash of it then it disappears.
It looks to me like HW/SW cursor switching has broken. Can someone
else confirm this?
It appears to
On Mon, Mar 03, 2003 at 10:31:56AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Sun, Mar 02, 2003 at 11:28:24PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
On Sat, Mar 01, 2003 at 10:34:20AM +0100, Sven Luther wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 04:19:37PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
Are you speaking about the current 4.3.0 or the
Feigning erudition, David Dawes wrote:
[evils of make -k]
% We could change the default, and let those who like the current behaviour
% run 'make WORLDOPTS=-k'. Since the original reasons for this are less
% valid now (builds are much faster than they once were), and since it
% catches a lot of
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I just noticed that if I use a large root window cursor it doesn't
work anymore. Actually I see a brief flash of it then it disappears.
It looks to me like HW/SW cursor switching has broken. Can someone
else confirm this?
It appears to
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
I just noticed that if I use a large root window cursor it doesn't
work anymore. Actually I see a brief flash of it then it disappears.
It looks to me like HW/SW cursor switching has broken.
Around 0 o'clock on Mar 4, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
This is the core SW cursor not the ARGB SW cursor, though I haven't tried
ARGB SW cursors (I forgot how to set one as the root cursor).
$ XCURSOR_THEME=redglass XCURSOR_SIZE=256 xsetroot -cursor_name shuttle
I guess I'll
have to set a flag in
The command:
xset m 2/1
only affects the primary mouse.
It should either affect both, or preferably have an option
to specify which mouse to alter.
If this is the wrong list to post this to, please advise.
Thanks,
Jon.
___
Devel mailing list
Hi
I ve a nice one :
I am using a TABLET PC and there we have multiple extra buttons both on
the keyboard and on the unit itself ..
now when i use xev to determine the Keycodes i get different ones for
each button on keyboard , but 2 buttons on the unit itself get me the
some code as i get
G S Osler wrote on 2003-02-28 21:05 UTC:
Do we have any filtered Tempest fonts available for X.
BDF was not designed to carry gray-scale bitmap glyphs, as would be
necessary to display low-pass filtered fonts.
The X11 font system is in addition at present not capable to vary each
useage of a
MK Putting an anti-tempest filter into freetype2 has been on my todo list
MK for a long time
Could you guys be so kind as to tell us mere mortals what you're
speaking about?
It's got something to do with deploying XFree86 in the American
embassy in Moscow, right?
Juliusz == Juliusz Chroboczek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
MK Putting an anti-tempest filter into freetype2 has been on my todo
MK list for a long time
Juliusz Could you guys be so kind as to tell us mere mortals what
Juliusz you're speaking about?
Presumably the idea is to manipulate the glyphs
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Jesse Hutton wrote:
My test scenario consists of enabling only these fontpaths in XF86Config-4
and commenting out the local font servers unix/:7100 and unix/:7110 (I'm
using XFree86-4.2.1-6 from debian unstable, btw):
FontPath
Try lowering the colour depth in XF86Config
Tom
On Monday 03 March 2003 07:42, . wrote:
Can't boot X :-(
Sincerely,
Dmitri Lissine
pgp0.pgp
Description: signature
I'd try looking at some of the more recent ATi cards
(Radeon 8xxx or 9xxx) - they can do both VGA and DVI,
and can, to the best of my knowledge, drive a TFT (via
DVI or VGA) at better than 1600x1200. Different
resolutions on different heads are possible, AFAIK,
but different color depths isn't.
The nVidia cards work fine too. On top of this, I personally think the linux
support of nVidia is far better than ATI...
Just my 2 cents :-)
Regards Harry
-Original Message-
From: Eric Sprague [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 03, 2003 9:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello,
with my Radeon QD, DPMS is not working: in all four modes (blank, standby,
suspend, off) the screen flickers or becomes black with some horizontal
stripes. Does anybody know this problem and have perhaps a solution?
How to repeat it:
xset s 1 ; xset dpms force standby/suspend/off
(On the
This message was sent through MyMail http://www.mymail.com.au
___
XFree86 mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/xfree86
To whom it
may concern.
I am facing
some problem on downloading the driver for below chipset.
Could you please
find me the exactly website to get the driver please.
Thank you.
S3
VIRGE/GX2 86C357 (AGP)
Regards,
Alex
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Nik Clayton wrote:
Can someone recommend any video cards that fit the following criteria:
* Has dual-head support
* Can run each head at different resolutions / depths (1 head at
1600x1200, 1 head at 1280x1024)
* Supports mixed analogue / DVI
Hi,
I have to activate X (Xfbdev / kdrive / tinyX) on a 4bpp grayscale
framebuffer device, based on an Epson s1d13705 display-controller. In the
meantime I have managed to run X (Version 4.2.1) on the 320x240 display,
but it looks like the nibbles (4bit blocks in a byte) are written in a
Missing modelines mean that the server should take its internal
ones.
1. You may want to look at
ftp://ftp.suse.com/pub/suse/i386/supplementary/X/XFree86/
for a later version of XFree86.
2. You should provide us with the full log file. Only then there
is the chance to help you as we
Regarding: Problem with old ATI All-In-Wonder
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86 Version: 4.2.1
OS: Gentoo 1.4rc3 and/or LinuxFromScratch 4.0
Area: Xserver
Server: XFree86 (The XFree86 4.x server)
Video Card:
ATI All-In-Wonder. 8MB w/
Try adjusting your horizontal sync rates and check you refresh rates.
(II) R128(0): Monitor0: Using hsync range of 31.50-48.50 kHz
(II) R128(0): Monitor0: Using vrefresh range of 40.00-70.00 Hz
(II) R128(0): Clock range: 12.50 to 250.00 MHz
(II) R128(0): Not using default mode 640x350 (vrefresh
Title: Message
we'll
need your log file to help. also there is a new release of XFree (4.3.0) so you
may wish to try that.
-Original Message-From: Tomas
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 3:34
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [XFree86] Mandrake
I really just sounds like something weird with the card. I'll
see if I can find one of those and try to reproduce. If the behavior
of the new DPMS support is questionable for older cards, I'll only
enable it for newer ones.
My card is a fairly generic one, so it could be the card itself but
Dear Sir/Mdm,
My pc is P4-2G with a intel mother board D845GBV, LCD
monitor.
each time I log out from X-window to text console, these
messagesshow out. after that,if Ire-enterX-window by
startx,screen becomes black. Press ctrl-alt-F1, back to console.
Say, once logged out from x-window, I
Regarding: compiling fails at file mipmap.c with -mfpmath=sse optimization enabled
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86 Version: 4.3.0 rpm source from SuSE ftp server
OS: SuSE 8.1
Area: compilinh
Server: XFree86 (The XFree86 4.x server)
Dear Sirs
I am having problems with the mouse.
When I first instaled RHL (every package)
everything worked out fine.
I have RHL for personal use at home, so when I do
not neet it I shut down the machine. After a few time of use of RHL at the
startup procedure of the operating system a
Dear Sirs
I am having problems with the mouse.
When I first instaled RHL (every package)
everything worked out fine.
I have RHL for personal use at home, so when I do
not neet it I shut down the machine. After a few time of use of RHL at the
startup procedure of the operating system
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Niclas Brunbäck wrote:
Regarding: Problem with old ATI All-In-Wonder
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86 Version: 4.2.1
OS: Gentoo 1.4rc3 and/or LinuxFromScratch 4.0
Area: Xserver
Server: XFree86 (The XFree86
XFree86 Version 4.2.1 / X Window System
(protocol Version 11, revision 0, vendor release 6600)
Release Date: 3 September 2002
If the server is older than 6-12 months, or if your card is
newer than the above date, look for a newer version before
reporting problems. (See
To whom may it concern:
Hello, I am having a lot of trouble with this Xconfigurator. When I go through the
steps it recognize the video card and doesn't probe it like I tell it to. Initial
configuration of X, the GUI shows up then when it goes for a refresh or startx, it
gives me an error
Hi,
I just set up mandrake 9.0 with xfree 4.2.1 and tried to have dual head
working on my radeon 7000... the relevant XF86Config entries I believe
are correct (see bottom, am omitting irrelevant stuff).
I tried already:
- reinstalling XFree from the official xfree86 distribution (suggested in
Oh sorry, lol, it was on the debian mailling list, anyway you got the answer now.
CheersDo You Yahoo!? -- Une adresse @yahoo.fr gratuite et en français !
Testez le nouveau Yahoo! Mail
Alessandro Cerri wrote:
Hi,
I just set up mandrake 9.0 with xfree 4.2.1 and tried to have dual head
working on my radeon 7000... the relevant XF86Config entries I believe
are correct (see bottom, am omitting irrelevant stuff).
I tried already:
- reinstalling XFree from the official xfree86
Hi,
I still feel, that there is something wrong with the
interrupts on my linux box:
CPU0
0: 45852 XT-PIC timer
1: 1503 XT-PIC keyboard
2: 0 XT-PIC cascade
3: 106071 XT-PIC serial
5: 0
Regarding: Render + Xinerama at different resolutions
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86 Version: 4.3.0
OS: Linux 2.4.20 + glibc 2.3.2 + gcc 3.2.2
Area: Xserver
Server: XFree86 (The XFree86 4.x server)
Video Card:
ATI Technologies Inc
I'm looking for an Xserver that will work on most (i386) hardware with
minimal configuration. It doesn't have to be accelerated or anything fancy.
What I want to do is put it on a bootable CD, have the user select a
resolution, and it will just work.
I can do it, sort of, by using the ordinary
High...
...still questions:
If I activate ACPI in Linux 2.4.20 I got about 200 fps with glxgears.
Without ACPI I get 1100 fps with the same program.
Both times, XF86.log does not say anything suspicous...
Any help? ;)
Keep Hacking!
Meino
___
Hi!
How can I disable the new ARGB cursors in XFree86 4.3.0 and revert to old-style BW
cursors?
My ATI RAGE Mobility M1 video card doesn't support hardware-accelerated ARGB cursors
and thus reverts to
software. This causes the mouse cursor to blink when redrawing is done nearby the
mouse
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 01:52, Michael Berlan wrote:
On Sun, 2003-03-02 at 20:33, Michel Dänzer wrote:
On Son, 2003-03-02 at 14:53, Michael Berlan wrote:
I'm having a little trouble getting DRI working with my ATI AIW Radeon
8500DV and was hoping for some help. I'm using the xfree 4.3
On Monday 03 March 2003 21:25, Peter Fairbrother wrote:
Lionel Lecoq wrote:
If you can read a bit of german the c't magazine put out a knoppix CD a
couple of week ago which
let you boot linux with kde 3.0, keeping your HD write protected, A
rather impressive achievment.
Info in
Michel Dänzer wrote:
Works great now. Thanks a ton!
You're welcome.
Wondering why that package isn't installed with the rest in
x-window-system.
Yep, it might be a good idea for x-window-system-core to depend on
xlibmesa4-dri. Mind making that suggestion to Daniel Stone in case he
doesn't
Setting the XCURSOR_CORE environment variable to 1 is one way.
There are probably others.
Mark.
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Felipe Alfaro Solana wrote:
Hi!
How can I disable the new ARGB cursors in XFree86 4.3.0 and revert to old-style BW
cursors?
My ATI RAGE
Regarding: The x server refuses to start with my ati radeon 9000
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XFree86 Version: 4.3.0 (install from source tgz)
OS: Debian Woody/SID Kernel: 2.4.20 #8 SMP
Area: Xserver
Server: Other, specify below
Server:
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 05:50, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
On Son, 2003-03-02 at 00:04, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
Problem has been solved now: The bios of the board had assigned the
irqs a little weird. I reinitialized the table and that's it.
Weird, I don't know how
On Mon, 2003-03-03 at 21:21, Meino Christian Cramer wrote:
If I activate ACPI in Linux 2.4.20 I got about 200 fps with glxgears.
Without ACPI I get 1100 fps with the same program.
Both times, XF86.log does not say anything suspicous...
Unfortunately, I can only guess:
For one, I think
Hi,
We are experiencing display problem since we updated redhat linux kernel
2.4.2smp to 2.4.18-24.7.xsmp. The update was done using up2date and during
the process it complained about incompatiblity of XFree86 newer version
with existing NVIDIA kernel version. So I uninstalled NVIDIA_kernel
Hi,
I am not sure if my previous message was recieved as I was a non-member. I
just subscribed to the list. So sorry for troubling you all if it went
through the first time and you are getting it again. My original message was:
We are experiencing display problem since we updated redhat linux
Hi,
I just bought a new laptop (ECS G732) with
an ATI Mobility M9 Radeon 9000 card.
Installed Red Hat 7.3 on it. But i can't
get Xwindows running.
Is there a driver that I need to install
that will help here. Any other settings
that I need to change?
Really appreciate the wonderful help from
I know there are newer releases, but this is the newest release with the
just released Aurora 1.0 (www.auroralinux.org) so this may still bo of
some interest, especially since it happens every time the screen server
runs.
Log follows:
XFree86 Version 4.2.0 (Custom Build: 4.2.0-8sparc) / X Window
i spent a lot of time fiddling with the Radeon 9000 driver,
both from ATI and XFree86,
it seems that the radeon driver from XFree86 4.3 doesn't support
3D acceleration, (although the config in RedHat 8 gives this option)
because tuxracer and Quake 3 runs extremely slow on my radeon 9000 128MB
card
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Nicolae Mihalache wrote:
I have a dell poweredge 1400sc serer running SuSE Linux 8.0 (XFree
4.2.0), which has an onboard ATI rage XL videocard. I want to plug an
extra PCI video card to be able to have a dual screen setup. I have an
old S3 Virge which works just fine but
Hi,
I am attaching a log file for my RedHat 8.0.93 installation
with ATI Radeon 7500 All-In-Wander card. Graphic system
does not start; I am getting Fatal server error: no
screens found.
Is this enough info to identify the problem?
Thanks,
Slava
XFree86.0.log
Description: Binary data
Hi
First of all thanks for the response from u sir. I have tried
XFree86 - confgure and then tested the XF86Config file, but still
it doesn't work. What should be the next option I should try
for.
P.Pradeep
On Sat, 01 Mar 2003 Josh Liechty wrote :
The problem you are having concerns the X Font
Hi!!
Ive got Slackware 8.1
on my Compaq Evo N115, but cant load X.
Xfree86.0.log in attachment.
Help me, pls.
Dmitri
XFree86.0.log
Description: Binary data
Anyone else get this?
make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/war/4.3.0/source/xc/lib/GL/dri/drm'
make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/war/4.3.0/source/xc/lib/GL/dri'
installing in lib/GL/GL...
make[4]: Entering directory `/home/war/4.3.0/source/xc/lib/GL/GL'
install -c -m 0755 libGL.so.1.2
Hi.
On: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:37:47 -0500,
Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2003 00:27, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Rene Rebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 12:20:04 +0100 (CET)
since this is the only reply from you to this topic, I wonder
On Monday 03 March 2003 03:31, Rene Rebe wrote:
Hi.
On: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 09:37:47 -0500,
Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 March 2003 00:27, David S. Miller wrote:
From: Rene Rebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 02 Mar 2003 12:20:04 +0100 (CET)
since
Hi.
On: Mon, 3 Mar 2003 10:42:44 -0500,
Balint Cristian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
yeah but not RH one !!!
Ah. When you mean RH then you should also write this ;-) When I read
and write 4.2.1 I mean the vanilla XFree86 one.
4.2.1-60 is good
4.2.1-60 is bad
In this versioning scheme i
77 matches
Mail list logo
