David Roberson <dlrober...@aol.com> wrote:
> I have shown quite simply that the original measurements of yours as well > as theirs are close to what should be expected. It is left to the > skeptics to explain where that kinetic energy ends up if not within the > holding tank. More to the point, they should show why this makes a difference, given that the method measures from the baseline to the final temperature. - Jed
