The only Giovanni Santostasi I saw on Google was an associate
neuroscientist at Northwestern University working on sleep disorders.
If that's you, you appear to have no relevant experience regarding the 1
MW plant.
Knowing you disbelieve anything I write, here is a published footnote at
the end of my paper on Cleaning up the Nuclear Waste at Hanford. I will
send you a photocopy of the last page that shows it if you send me your
email address.
"Footnote
Adrian Ashfield is collaborating with Larry Penberthy in this project.
He previously headed engineering for Canning Town Glass in the U.K.
Domglas in Canada. Anchor Hocking and Wheaton Industries in the U.S.
before starting Ashfield Associates in 1981."
On 8/14/2016 4:31 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
A link to a CV or linkedin takes a second. Not acceptable answer that
you did this on the past.
You are using your claim of experience right now.
What is your real name?
It is you that is using arguments from authority. Mine stand on their
own.
And as I said, you can google my name and see what is my experience in
science and technology. I'm 100 times more transparent than you are.
Giovanni
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:28 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net
<mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
I have already done so on this blog in the past. Please answer
the question.
On 8/14/2016 4:20 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
Besides what I have said about using "argument from authority" as
a way to win a debate, can you please give us a link to your CV
a.ashfield?
Can you back up your claims to have such expertise?
Thanks,
Giovanni
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
<gsantost...@gmail.com <mailto:gsantost...@gmail.com>> wrote:
A.ashfield:
"Ad hominem" attacks. To quote a famous immortal scene from
the "Princess Bride": "You keep using that word. I don't
think it means what you think it means".
I didn't attack anybody at hominem. I didn't put down Penon
not to have a PhD.
I simply stated that Rossi saying he has a Doctorate is not
true and that is at least sloppy and probably misleading.
It doesn't reflect negatively on me at all.
So let me reflect this back at you given you don't understand
what ad hominem attack is and instead you are using your
supposed experience to make an argument (and trying to
disqualify my arguments too as a consequence) and therefore
committing another known fallacy , i. e. "argument from
authority".
Giovanni
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 PM, a.ashfield
<a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Giovanni,
Your string of ad hominem attacks do nothing to clarify
the issues and reflect badly on you.
I find Dr. Levi's 18 hour test of an E-Cat in 2011,
without steam, finding a COP 15 -20kW peaking at 130 kW
is good proof that the E-Cat produces considerable excess
heat. As I've said, the performance of the 1 MW plant
has yet to be proven.
Having headed engineering for large corporations and
later consulting around the world, doing due diligence
for organizations like GRI, EPRI, OECD and the World
Bank, I have considerable experience in judging people
and new technologies.
What experience do you have?
