I have already done so on this blog in the past. Please answer the
question.
On 8/14/2016 4:20 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote:
Besides what I have said about using "argument from authority" as a
way to win a debate, can you please give us a link to your CV a.ashfield?
Can you back up your claims to have such expertise?
Thanks,
Giovanni
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Giovanni Santostasi
<gsantost...@gmail.com <mailto:gsantost...@gmail.com>> wrote:
A.ashfield:
"Ad hominem" attacks. To quote a famous immortal scene from the
"Princess Bride": "You keep using that word. I don't think it
means what you think it means".
I didn't attack anybody at hominem. I didn't put down Penon not to
have a PhD.
I simply stated that Rossi saying he has a Doctorate is not true
and that is at least sloppy and probably misleading.
It doesn't reflect negatively on me at all.
So let me reflect this back at you given you don't understand what
ad hominem attack is and instead you are using your supposed
experience to make an argument (and trying to disqualify my
arguments too as a consequence) and therefore committing another
known fallacy , i. e. "argument from authority".
Giovanni
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 PM, a.ashfield
<a.ashfi...@verizon.net <mailto:a.ashfi...@verizon.net>> wrote:
Giovanni,
Your string of ad hominem attacks do nothing to clarify the
issues and reflect badly on you.
I find Dr. Levi's 18 hour test of an E-Cat in 2011, without
steam, finding a COP 15 -20kW peaking at 130 kW is good proof
that the E-Cat produces considerable excess heat. As I've
said, the performance of the 1 MW plant has yet to be proven.
Having headed engineering for large corporations and later
consulting around the world, doing due diligence for
organizations like GRI, EPRI, OECD and the World Bank, I have
considerable experience in judging people and new technologies.
What experience do you have?
