A link to a CV or linkedin takes a second. Not acceptable answer that you did this on the past. You are using your claim of experience right now. What is your real name? It is you that is using arguments from authority. Mine stand on their own. And as I said, you can google my name and see what is my experience in science and technology. I'm 100 times more transparent than you are.
Giovanni On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:28 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> wrote: > I have already done so on this blog in the past. Please answer the > question. > > > > On 8/14/2016 4:20 PM, Giovanni Santostasi wrote: > > Besides what I have said about using "argument from authority" as a way to > win a debate, can you please give us a link to your CV a.ashfield? > Can you back up your claims to have such expertise? > Thanks, > Giovanni > > > > > On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 4:10 PM, Giovanni Santostasi < > gsantost...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> A.ashfield: >> >> "Ad hominem" attacks. To quote a famous immortal scene from the "Princess >> Bride": "You keep using that word. I don't think it means what you think it >> means". >> >> I didn't attack anybody at hominem. I didn't put down Penon not to have a >> PhD. >> I simply stated that Rossi saying he has a Doctorate is not true and that >> is at least sloppy and probably misleading. >> >> It doesn't reflect negatively on me at all. >> >> So let me reflect this back at you given you don't understand what ad >> hominem attack is and instead you are using your supposed experience to >> make an argument (and trying to disqualify my arguments too as a >> consequence) and therefore committing another known fallacy , i. e. >> "argument from authority". >> >> Giovanni >> >> >> >> >> >> On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 3:52 PM, a.ashfield <a.ashfi...@verizon.net> >> wrote: >> >>> Giovanni, >>> Your string of ad hominem attacks do nothing to clarify the issues and >>> reflect badly on you. >>> >>> I find Dr. Levi's 18 hour test of an E-Cat in 2011, without steam, >>> finding a COP 15 -20kW peaking at 130 kW is good proof that the E-Cat >>> produces considerable excess heat. As I've said, the performance of the 1 >>> MW plant has yet to be proven. >>> >>> Having headed engineering for large corporations and later consulting >>> around the world, doing due diligence for organizations like GRI, EPRI, >>> OECD and the World Bank, I have considerable experience in judging people >>> and new technologies. >>> What experience do you have? >>> >>> >> > >
