Dear Jojo, Please do not say offending things- nobody is using me for nothing; I have asked DGTG, it was my initiative to publish two writings (till now) about them and I take full responsibility for what I say. If you will read ALL my NEW ENERGY papers on the blog Ego Out you will learn how I have developed my understanding of the field - see e.g. the Metaphor Story of LENR. For the time given I still can think alone.
Why should DGTG need an intermediate for example to get in touch with Widom Larsen? Lew Larsen is a very friendly and open scientist- I had many pleasant discussions with him at ICCF Marseille and good correspondence after. I think his theory has to be taken very seriously. Peter On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:12 AM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > ** > Well, it's seems obvious to me; so that they are insulated from mistakes. > If major mistakes are found later on, they can deny that was ever what they > had. > > For example: DGT is using Peter to send out feelers as to their theory > being compatible with W&L. Now, you have smart people like Jones pointing > out that their theory is more compatible with CQM than with W&L. It seems > they want to insulate themselves from such amatuerish mistakes and they've > chosen a very eager fall guy. (Not to disparage Peter, cause I would have > done the same thing.) If they had published this on their own in their web > site, people would point out these amatuerish mistakes and affect their > credibility. Now, they can simply deny it and blame it on somebody else. > > You've got to start thinking more "conspiratorially" Terry :-) Cause > conspiracies are probably happening more often in every day life than we > are aware of. > > That Xanthoulis guy leaves a "bad taste on my mouth" from the first time I > read his interview. He practically confessed to stealing Rossi's catalyst > from the ash analysis results. And having known what the catalyst was, it > would have been a straightforward thing to deduce its function. Hence, > they could have come up with a better catalyst and claim it as their own > innovation. > > Yes, DGT may have a "better" reactor, but only because they ripped off > Rossi's technology and built on it. > > Jojo > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Terry Blanton <hohlr...@gmail.com> > *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 17, 2012 9:07 AM > *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:principles of DGTG 's technology > > > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 8:58 PM, Jojo Jaro <jth...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > Peter maybe being set up for a fall. >> >> > > And their reason would be? > > T > > -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com
